Upload
others
View
17
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
166
LAMPIRAN
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
167
KUESIONER OFFLINE
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
168
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
169
KUESIONER ONLINE
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
170
Transkrip Focus Group Discussion :
1. Focus Group Discussion Obejectives
Mendapatkan insight dari para responden mengenai apakah mereka
ingin melamar di perusahaan Astra Credit Companies
Mengetahui pentingnya reputasi sebuah perusahaan ketika mereka
ingin melamar pekerjaan
Mengetahui peran penggunaan sosial media dan job characteristics
ketika ingin mencari pekerjaan
2. Focus Group Discussion Respondents (Semua responden sudah semester 8) :
Dilla Puspa (Mahasiswa BSI Jakarta)
Firlie Bahari (Mahasiswa UNTIRTA)
Rexy Anggraini (Mahasiswa UMN)
Rinny Arifa (Mahasiswa Universitas Indonesia)
Safira Riskiana (Mahasiswa Trisakti)
3. Focus Group Discussion Environment
Ruangan tertutup dan jauh dari kebisingan
Duduk melingkar
Perekam suara (Handphone) dan Perekam Video
4. Moderator
Lita Mutiasari (Mahasiswa UMN)
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
171
5. Questions
Apakah teman-teman mengetahui perusahaan leasing dan sebutkan
contoh perusahaan leasing yang teman” ketahui?
apakah temen-temen mengetahui tantang ACC? Dan apa yang temen”
bayangkan tentang perusahaan ACC?
Ketika udh lulus temen” tertarik tidak untuk bekerja di ACC?
Apakah corporate image itu mempengatuhi keputusan temen” dalam
melamar pekerjaan?
reputasi perusahaan yang bagus itu seperti apa dilihat dari aspek apa?
apakah social media itu dapat memberikan informasi yang cukup
ketika temen-temen ingin melamar pekerjaan? Dan apak media social
media itu membantu temen-temen untuk mencari pekerjaan?
apa yang temen” perhatikan dari kategori pekerjaannya itu? Seperti
ketika saya ingin melamar kerja saya melihat apa feedback yang saya
akan lakukan atau apa yang akan saya lakukan dri pekerjaan itu.
Bagaimana pengalaman temen-temen ketika ingin magang dan bisa
disebutkan dimana temen-temen pernah magang ?
6. Waktu dan Tempat
Hari/Tanggal : Minggu/2 Oktober 2017
Pukul : 17.00 – 18.30 WIB
Tempat : Ruang Tamu
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
172
TRANSKRIP FGD 2 OKTOBER 2017
LM : Lita Mutia
RA : RINNY ARIFA
SR : SAFIR RISKIANA
RX : REXY ANGGRAINI
DP : DILLA PUSPA SARI
FB : FIRLIE BAHARI
LM : Selamat sore teman-teman, terima kasih sudah meluangkan waktu untuk
melaksanakan focus group discussion hari ini dan untuk mempersingkat waktu mari
kita mulai. Sebelumnya perkenalan diri dulu nama, angkatan berapa dan asal
universitas ?
RA : nama saya Rinny arifa angkatan 2014 semester 7 di universitas Indonesia
SR : nama saya safira riskiana angkatan 2014 semester 7 universitas trisakti
DP : nama saya dilla angkatan 2014 baru lulus dari BSI Tangerang
RX : nama saya Rexy angkatan 2014 semester 7 dari UMN
FB : nama saya firlie bahari angkatan 2014 dari universitas agung tirtayasa
(UNTIRTA)
LM : untuk mempersingkat waktu langsung ke Pertanyaan pertama apakah teman-
teman mengetahui perusahaan leasing dan sebutkan contoh perusahaan leasing yang
teman” ketahui?
RA : Setau saya perusahaan leasing adalah perusahaan yang memberikan kredit
kepada masyarakat yang ingin membeli mobil contohnya BCA Finance
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
173
SR : setau saya salah satu contoh leasing yaitu FIF Finance
DP : Setau saya leasing itu perkreditan seperti alat berat contohnya Adira Finance,
BCA Finance
RA: perusahaan sewa guna usaha seperti mesin fotocopy, truck, atau bus untuk
operasional perusahaan. Contohnya ACC dan mandiri finance
FB : Leasing perusahaan yang brgerak dibidang perkreditan, seperti aeon dan
mandiri finance
LM: Untuk pertanyaan kedua, tadi Rexy telah menyebut ACC, apakah temen-temen
mengetahui tantang? Dan apa yang temen” bayangkan tentang perusahaan ACC?
RA : yang saya ketahui ACC ialah perusahaan astra untuk asuransi mobil yang
kantornya terletak disamping jalan tol tb simatupang
SR : ACC itu untuk kredit mobil contohnya mobil Avanza
DP : ACC ialah perusahaan kredit di Indonesia
RX : ACC perusahaan multiguna usaha dari perusahaan astra dan letaknya di
samping tol. ACC juga suka membuak pelatihan untuk karyawan yg di
selenggarakan di kampus”.
FB : ACC anak perusahaan astra yang bergerak di bidang asuransi mobil dana cc
juga membiayai UMKM di Indonesia
LM : temen” telah berada di semester akhir dan bahkan ada yang lulus. Ketika udh
lulus temen” tertarik tidak untuk bekerja di ACC?
FB : tentu mau karena ACC adalah anak perusahaan astra yang dimana astra
perusahaan terbesar di Indonesia
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
174
RA : mau banget karena termasuk perusahaan astra. Dan astra perusahaan yang
menjadikan. Karena itu juga saya membuka website di ACC itu dan mengetahui
adanya pelatihan yang diselenggarakan ACC untuk mahasiswa, jadi saya sangat
tertarik untuk bisa bergabung di ACC ketika saya sudah lulus
DP : saya berminat untuk masuk Astra karena Astra terkenal perusahan besar diastral
dan bisa mendapatkan pengalaman yang bagus.
SR : saya juga mau banget mengingat astra adalah perusahaan yang bonafit di
Indonesia
RA : saya sudah pasti mau, karena ketika job fair astra memiliki antrian terpanjang
dan saingan nya juga banyak .
LM : lanjut kepertanyaan berikutnya, temen” pertama kali mendengar ACC itu dari
mana ya?
RA : dari website secara umum saja
SR : ketika kaka saya membeli mobil, saya ditawari perkreditan di ACC
DP : melihat dri website
RX : di website juga
FB : saya tau karena saya pernah bekerja (magang) di perusahaan kompetitornya
yaitu FIF Finance, jd saya bisa mengetahui ACC.
LM : untuk informasi ACC adalah perusahaan yang telah berdiri selama 35 tahun
dan menjadi salah satu perusahaan leasing terbesar di Indonesia. ACC juga telah
menerima penghargaan sebagai best corporate image selama 6 tahun berturut”.
Pertayaan selanjutnya menurut temen-temen apakah corporate image itu
mempengatuhi keputusan temen” dalam melamar pekerjaan?
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
175
RA :iya menurut saya iya karena ketika kita udh lulus kita mau bekerja di
perusahaan yang reputasinya bagus
SR ; iyaa karena ketika kita ingin melamar pekerjaan kita lihat dulu perusahaan nya
bagus dan bonafit untuk pekerjaan kita
DP : reputasi berpengaruh banget karena semua org ingin masuk ke perusahaan yang
reputasinya bagus
RX : Penting bgt, karena menurut saya karena saya memiliki cita-cta yang tinggi dan
ingin bekerja diperusahaan yang bagus contohnya astra, semua orang mengetahui
astra sebagai perusahaan yang bagus jadi saya menginginkan bekerja di perusahaan
yang memiliki reputasi bagus seperti astra.
FB :iyaa, ketika kita mau bekerja kita liat reputasi perusahaannya, sehingga ketika
reputasi perusahaan bagus maka akan mendukung benefit yang bakal kita dapatkan
ketika bekerja di perusahaan tersebut.
LM : menurut temen-temen reputasi perusahaan yang bagus itu seperti apa dilihat
dari aspek apa?
RA : menurut saya pertama dari gaji kepada karyawan, karena pasti ketika bekerja
itu gajinya dan jenjang karir yang bagusnya seperti apa
SR : menurut saya kualitas dri produknya. Ketika kualitas bagus maka akan
menghasilkan reputasi yang baik
DP : reputasi yang bagus itu bisa dilihat dari kemakmuran karyawannya dan produk
apa yang dihasilkan apakah itu berkualitas atau tidak.
RX : budaya soalnya budaya mempengaruhi ingkungan. Ketika lingkungan baik
maka mendukung performa karyawan . yang kedua gaji ketika gaji nya seimbang
dengan kinerja yang diberikan maka akan mendukung performa karyawan juga
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
176
FB : dilihat dari laporan keuangan yang baik
LM : pertanyaan selanjutnya, menurut temen-temen apakah social media itu dapat
memberikan informasi yang cukup ketika temen-temen ingin melamar pekerjaan?
Dan apak media social media itu membantu temen-temen untuk mencari pekerjaan?
RA: menurut saya sangat membantu karena sekarang melihat lowongan pekerjaan di
media social contohnya Instagram, tentu sangat membantu dripada harus secara
tradisional dating langsung ke perusahaannya dan belum tentu ada lowongannya.
Jika di media social sudah terlihat jelas jika diperusahaan tersebut ada lowongan
pekerjaan
SR : menurut saya sangat membantu karena sekarang sudah serba online jadi tidak
perlu kita cari dikoran atau ke perusahannya langsung, jadi tinggal cari di online
media social saja.
DP : Menurut saya media social snagat membantu tetapi untuk informasi yang lebih
terpercaya melihat website perusahannya yaa.
RX: Sangat membantu karena saat ini media social sangat mempengaruhi . dan saat
ini pembagian informasi lowongan pekerjaan dan informasi prduk sekarang berada
di media social yang berbeda sehingga lebih memudahkan para pencari kerja.
FB: media social itu penting banget karena saat ini semua sudah menggunakan
media social jadi memudahkan para pencari pekerja di media social.
LM : Ketika temen-temen ingin melamar pekerjaan, apa yang temen” perhatikan dari
kategori pekerjaannya itu? Seperti ketika saya ingin melamar kerja saya melihat apa
feedback yang saya akan lakukan atau apa yang akan saya lakukan dri pekerjaan itu.
RA : saya melihat job desc nya. Karena ada pekerjaan yang tidak sesuai dengan job
desc nya jadi tidak sesuai dengan apa yang kita mau dari pekerjannya
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
177
SR : saya melihat dari feedback yang akan diberikan oleh perusahaan contohnya
seperti adanya jaminan kesehatan
DP : dari job desc yang jelas agar sesuai dengan apa yang akan kita lakukan dan
gajinya juga harus sesuai dengan apa yang kita dapatkan
RX : pertama pekerjannya sesuai dengan latar belakang jurusan kuliah saya, kedua
gaji nya sesuai dengan standard gaji posisi tersebut.
FB : job desc nya seperti apa, feedback yang akan kita dapatkan itu apa
LM : Bagaimana pengalaman temen-temen ketika ingin magang dan bisa disebutkan
dimana temen-temne pernah magang ?
RA : saya magang pertama rekomendasi orang tua di mandiri dan pt Telkom . waktu
magang itu job desc nya tidak sesuai dengan jurusan latar belakang saya, banyak
tugas” yang diberikan bukan sesuai divisi saya magang seperti menjadi mc di acara
CSR dll.
SR : saya magang karena rekomendasi orang tua di PT angkasa pura 2 persero.
Pengalamannya saya tau jalannya keuangan di sana hingga proses reimbursement
dan mengetahui cara menulis laporan keuangan
DP : saya pernah magang di perusahaan garment PT surya abadi, pengalamannya
sesuai denga job desc yang ada di lowongan pekerjaan
RX : saya pernah magang di kemetrweian komunikasi sebagai admi dan bank
perkreditan rakyat dan disini saya tidak ditempatkan secara jelas dmna, kadang
diteller, accunting atau pajak. Jadi job decnya banyak ..
FB : magang di PT garuda maintenance Indonesia di soekarno hatta di bidang
accounting. Dan ketika magang sesuai dengan judul laporan saya, dan saya di
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
178
tempatkan di financial reporting dan kerja nya hanya sebagai pendukung seperti
meliat laporan keuang dibandingkan apakah sudah benar atau tidak
LM : saya rasa sudah cukup terima kasih sudah meluangkan waktunya.
TRANSKRIP IN DEPTH INTERVIEW
Waktu : 25 Oktober 2017
Tempat : Gedung A Rektorat Lt. 5 UMN
Interviewer : Lita Mutiasari
Narasumber : Dalia Sari (Mahasiswa UMN)
Durasi : 4 menit 44 detik
LM : selamat siang dalia, terimakasih kaena telah meluangkan waktunya untuk
interview hari ini, langsung kepertanyaan pertama. Apa yang kamu ketahui tentang
Astra Credit Companies?
Dalia : ACC itu perusahaan leasing kendaraan dari Astra
LM : tau dari mana?
Dalia: udah tau dari lama liat gedungnya di Jakarta dan liat dimedia social dan koran
LM: tertarik untuk melamar di ACC?
Dalia: tertarik, karena salah satu anak perusahaan Astra. Jadi pengen kerja disana
LM : menurut kamu reputasi perusahaan itu penting ga?
Dalia : penting banget soalnya untuk jenjang karir lebih baik dan reputasi perusahaan
itu dibutuhkan . dan reputuasi perusahaan bisa menjadi kebanggan tersendiri jika di
kenal oleh orang banyak.
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
179
LM : menurut kamu reputasi perusahaan yang bagus itu dilihat dari aspek apa sih?
Dalia : dilihat dari benefit yang dikasih ke karyawannya, branding yang oke
LM: Menurut kamu social media itu membantu kamu ga sih untuk mencari informasi
lowongan pekerjaan?
Dalia : membantu banget ditambah saat ini sebagai gen y membutuhkan informasi
yang cepet, sehingga perusahaan yang menggunakan social media itu membantu
sekali
LM : pernah memiliki pengalaman mencari informasi pekerjaan di social media?
Dalia : pernah, waktu itu cari magang, kemudian cari di job vacancy dan ig nya
LM : sebeumnya dalia memiliki pengalaman magang ya?
Dalia : iya di Astra Infratall road Merak
LM : ketika magang di Astra itu dalia melihat job spec nya tidak?
Dalia : liat, job specificationnya yang sesuai dengan major saya human resources.
Kemudian saya melamar disana
LM: menurut dahlia job spec atau job requirement itu penting?
Dalia: iya penting sekali karena itu menjadi syarat dari perusahaan yang diinginkan
untuk karyawan yg bisa bekerja disana. Jadi untuk diterima jadi karyawan kita harus
memenuhi job spec yang di tentukan oleh perusahaan.
LM: Job spec yang baik itu seperti apa?
Dalia : menurut saya job spec yang jelas itu mencantumkan tingkat pendidikan,
feedback, skill dan macam” pekerjaan yang dilakukan nantinya
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
180
Lm: ketika mau melamar kerja dalia memperhatikan apa saja? Baik dari perusahaan
atau pekerjaannya?
Dalia : pertama saya melihat branding perusahaan, kedua benefit yang nonfinancial,
dan gaji nya yang sesuai dengan pekerjannya
LM: oke terimakasih untuk waktunya hari ini
TRANSKRIP IN DEPTH INTERVIEW
Waktu : 25 Oktober 2017
Tempat : Gedung A Rektorat Lt. 5 UMN
Interviewer : Lita Mutiasari
Narasumber : Elizabeth Widjdja (Mahasiswa UMN)
Durasi : 4 menit 43 detik
LM : selamat siang Elizabeth, terimakasih karena telah meluangkan waktunya untuk
interview hari ini, langsung kepertanyaan pertama. Apa yang kamu ketahui tentang
Astra Credit Companies?
Elizabeth : yang saya tau ACC itu anak perusahaan Astra. Yang memiliki banyak
bisnis unit dan termasuk perusahaan yang besar
LM : tau ACC dari mana?
Elizabeth : dari iklan-iklan dan temen-temen yang kerja magang disana
LM: tertarik untuk melamar kerja di ACC?
Elizabeth: tertarik karena ACC anak perusahaan yang besar dan karir kerja yang
lumayan
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
181
LM : menurut kamu reputasi perusahaan itu penting ga?
Elizabeth : penting karena reputasi membawa gambaran karyawan diri kita sendiri.
Karena itu berdampak ke kehidupan kita selanjutnya.
LM : menurut kamu reputasi perusahaan yang bagus dilihat dari aspek apa saja?
Elizabeth : aspek terpenting itu ada 2 yaitu marketing bagaimana mempromosikan
produknya yang akan berdampak dari pihak external dan HRD bagaimana dia
mentreat karyawannya yang akan menarik perhatian job seeker.
LM : menurut kamu penggunaan social media itu membantu ga sih buat kamu
mencari informasi mengenai lowongan pekerjaan?
Elizabeth: sangat membantu
LM : bisa diceritakan pengalamannya mencari informasi lowongan pekerjaan di
social media?
Elizabeth : waktu itu mencari line jobs, dan itu membantu informasi lowongan
pekerjaan dan job fair dimana sajaa?
LM: menurut kamu job spec itu penting ga sih?
Elizabeth : penting banget . karena ketika kita mengetahui job spec nya apa kita
dapat mengetahui peran kita nantinya di perusahaan akan seperti apa. Dan
mengetahui kriteria yang dibutuhin oleh perusahaan seperti apa.
LM : bisa cerita kana pengalaman magang nya? Dan apakah km memperhatikan job
specnya?
Elizabeth : jadi saya kerja di arimbi, tidak terlalu yang terpenting harus di bagian
HR, mungkin karena untuk magang jadi job spec tidak terlalu diperhatikan, tetapi
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
182
ketika bekerja nanti mengetahui job spec itu penting agar kita dapat mencapai tujuan
perusahaan dan apa yang diinginkan oleh atasan?
LM : yang km ketahui tentang job spec itu seperti apa?
Elizabeth : kriteria yang diperusahaan seperti apa, orang itu harus seerti apa,
kemampuan yang harus dimiliki, itu si yang penting
LM : ketika melamar pekerjaan apa yang Elizabeth perhatikan ketika melamar
pekerjaan baik itu dri perusahaan atau pekerjaan?
Elizabeth : dari pekerjaan nya yang pertama, apa yang harus dikerjakan, tanggung
jawab untuk pekerjaan dan kedua perusahaan itu seperti apa bagus atau tidak
LM: oke terimakasih untuk waktunya hari ini
TRANSKRIP IN DEPTH INTERVIEW
Waktu : 23 Oktober 2017
Tempat : Ruang Tamu
Interviewer : Lita Mutiasari
Narasumber : Nurul Azizah Oktarayasa (Mahasiswa UI)
Durasi : 3 menit 34 detik
LM : selamat siang Nurul, terimakasih karena telah meluangkan waktunya untuk
interview hari ini, langsung kepertanyaan pertama. Apa yang kamu ketahui tentang
Astra Credit Companies?
Nurul : menurut saya Astra itu perusahaan asuransi dimana ACC adalah salah satu
anak perusahaan astra company
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
183
LM: Tau ACC dari mana?
Nurul : dari social media, web, google
LM : nurul tertarik ga untuk melamar di ACC?
Nurul : untuk saya sangat tertarik, karena ACC perusahaan cukup besar dan dibawah
naungan Astra
LM : menurut nurul reputasi perusahaan itu penting ga sih?
Nurul : penting karena reputasi perusahaan menunjukan jati diri perusahaan yang
bisa dilihat dri kesejahteraan karyawannya?
LM : menurut nurul reputasi perusahaan yang bagus dapat dilihat dari aspek apa
saja?
Nurul : dari besar nya bangunan, dari pendapat masyarakat dan kesejahteraan
karyawan
LM: menurut kamu social media membantu ga buat mencari informasi lowongan
pekerjaan?
Nurul : sangat membantu, seperti informasi di Instagram sehingga mudah di akses
LM: ketika mau melamar pekerjaan aspek apa yang dilihat?
Nurul : dari reputasi perusahaan dan dari job specificationnya
LM: kenapa job spec itu penting
Nurul : karena job spec dapat melihat apakah diri kita sesuai dengan kriteria
perusahaan apa tidak?
LM : Job spec yang baik itu seperti apa?
Nurul : mencakup umur, pengalman , pendidikan dll
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
184
LM: ketika melamar pekerjaan apa yang dilihat baik dari perusahaan dan pekerjaan?
Nurul : pertama reputasi perusahaan, job spec dan job desc nya sesuai dengan latar
belakang pendidikan saya atau tidak.
LM: oke terimakasih untuk waktunya hari ini
TRANSKRIP IN DEPTH INTERVIEW
Waktu : 27 Oktober 2017
Tempat : Gedung A Rektorat Lt. 5 UMN
Interviewer : Lita Mutiasari
Narasumber : Putri Fatimatuzzahra (Mahasiswa UMN)
Durasi : 4 menit 36 detik
LM : selamat siang Putri, terimakasih karena telah meluangkan waktunya untuk
interview hari ini, langsung kepertanyaan pertama. Apa yang kamu ketahui tentang
Astra Credit Companies?
Putri : ACC itu perusahaan pembiayaan di Indonesia
LM : tau ACC dari mana?
Putri : tau dari acara kampus management yaitu the apprentice dan hadiahnya
magang di ACC
LM : tertarik untuk melamar di ACC?
Putri : kalo disana kurang karena saya lebih pengen perusahaan yang non financial
seperti perusahaan e-commerce
LM : menurut kamu reputasi perusahaan itu penting ga?
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
185
Putri : penting karena ketika kita kerja di perusahaan yang ternama kita lebih percaya
diri karena banyak orang yang tau perusahaan kita
LM : menurut kamu reputasi perusahaan yang bagus jika dilihat dari aspek apa?
Putri : perusahaan nya dikenal banyak orang dan produknya dikenal orang banyak
LM : menurut kamu penggunaan social media itu penting ga sih buat kamu mencari
informasi tentang lowongan pekerjaa?
Putri : iya ngebantu banget karena kita sering melihat Instagram, line dan saya sering
melihat kalo ada lamaran pekerjaan. Nah karena kita sering lihat social media jadi
kita bisa tau kalo ada lowongan pekerjaan,
LM : ketika mencari pekerjaan lihat job spec nya ga?
Putri : lihat karena bisa menentukan kecocokan antara perusahaan inginkan dengan
apa yang kita bisa
LM : bisa ceritakan pengalaman magang nya?
Putri : iyaa saya magang di Telkom BSD, disana saya kalo mau magang langsung
dating ketempat dengan membawa berkas yang dibutuhkan, setelah disana kita minta
mau dibagian apa sesuai dengan background kita. Dan setelah itu saya menanyakan
mengenai job spec yang akan saya kerjakan sesuai tidak dengan background
pendidikan saya,
LM : ketika melamar pekerjaan apa yang Putri perhatikan ketika melamar pekerjaan
baik itu dri perusahaan atau pekerjaan?
Putri : pertama dari perusahaannya bagaimana lingkungan kerja nya, baru ke
pekerjaannya yang sesuai dengan background nya agar kita bisa lolos dalam tahap
seleksi nya.
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
186
LM: oke terimakasih untuk waktunya hari ini
TRANSKRIP IN DEPTH INTERVIEW
Waktu : 3 Oktober 2017
Tempat : Libro Cafe UMN
Interviewer : Lita Mutiasari
Narasumber : Christian Wijasa (Mahasiswa UMN)
Durasi : 5 menit 10 detik
LM : selamat siang Christian Wijasa, terimakasih karena telah meluangkan waktunya
untuk interview hari ini, langsung kepertanyaan pertama. Apa yang kamu ketahui
tentang Astra Credit Companies?
Christian Wijasa : ACC itu perusahaan ang bergerak dibidang financing roda empat
dan anak perusahaan astra international
LM : Tau ACC dari mana ya?
Christian Wijasa : dari Instagram, social media facebook dan youtube
LM : tertarik untuk melamar di ACC:
Christian Wijasa : tertarik karena saya bisa menjadi karyawan Astra yang dapat
beradaptasi aktif untuk membangun Indonesia menjadi lebih baik seperti misi Astra
International yaitu satu Indonesia
LM : menurut km reputasi perusahaan itu penting ga sih?
Christian Wijasa : penting karena jika perusahaan yang reputasi nya bagus maka
banyak orang yang tau perusahaan itu
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
187
LM : reputasi yang baik itu dilihat dari aspek apa?
Christian Wijasa : dari kontribusi perusahaan untuk karyawan dan masyarakat
LM : penggunaan social media itu membantu ga untuk mencari informasi mengenai
lowongan pekerjaan?
Christian Wijasa : sangat membantu karena saat ini serba digital,yang serba
gamapang sehingga penting untuk perusahaan menggunakan social media
LM : ketika melamar pekerjaan lihat job spec nya itu penting tidak?
Christian Wijasa : penting karena sebelum malamar saya melihat job spec yang
dibutuhkan dan menyesuaikan dengan kemampuan apa yang saya miliki.
LM : bisa ceritakan pengalaman magang nya?
Christian Wijasa :saya pernah magang di sebuah perusahaan IT, waktu itu saya
mendapatkan informasi magang dari teman saya. Kemudian saya melamar magang
disana dan saya bekerja di bagian IT Programmer.
LM : ketika melamar pekerjaan apa yang Christian Wijasa perhatikan ketika
melamar pekerjaan baik itu dri perusahaan atau pekerjaan?
Christian Wijasa : kalo saya magang waktu itu saya lebih mencari pekerjaan yang
saya suka, kebetulan saya kan dari prodi IT jadi saya mencari di bagian IT.
Kemudian ada lowongan bagian programmer dan saya cukup tau banyak mengenai
hal tersebut jadi saya mau untuk melamar pekerjaan itu sewaktu saya magang. Tetapi
untuk bekerja nanti saya akan tetap cari pekerjaan yang sesuai background
pendidikan saya yaitu IT dan mau cari perusahaan yang bergerak di bidang teknologi
si sepertinya begitu.
LM: oke terimakasih untuk waktunya hari ini yaa
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
188
Data Pre-Test
Employer Attractiveness – Interest Value
Uji Validitas
KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,729
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 57,071
df 6
Sig. ,000
Anti-image Matrices
INTEREST
VALUE 1
INTEREST
VALUE 2
INTEREST
VALUE 3
INTEREST
VALUE 4
Anti-image Covariance INTEREST VALUE 1 ,431 -,204 ,048 -,177
INTEREST VALUE 2 -,204 ,498 -,143 ,006
INTEREST VALUE 3 ,048 -,143 ,403 -,216
INTEREST VALUE 4 -,177 ,006 -,216 ,329
Anti-image Correlation INTEREST VALUE 1 ,729a -,440 ,116 -,471
INTEREST VALUE 2 -,440 ,785a -,320 ,016
INTEREST VALUE 3 ,116 -,320 ,714a -,593
INTEREST VALUE 4 -,471 ,016 -,593 ,700a
a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)
Communalities
Initial Extraction
INTEREST VALUE 1 1,000 ,704
INTEREST VALUE 2 1,000 ,674
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
189
Component Matrixa
Component
1
INTEREST VALUE 1 ,839
INTEREST VALUE 2 ,821
INTEREST VALUE 3 ,842
INTEREST VALUE 4 ,887
Extraction Method: Principal
Component Analysis.
a. 1 components extracted.
Total Variance Explained
Component
Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %
1 2,874 71,861 71,861 2,874 71,861 71,861
2 ,523 13,085 84,946
3 ,408 10,198 95,144
4 ,194 4,856 100,000
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Employer Attractiveness – Interest Value
Uji Reabilitas
INTEREST VALUE 3 1,000 ,709
INTEREST VALUE 4 1,000 ,787
Extraction Method: Principal Component
Analysis.
Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 30 100,0
Excludeda 0 ,0
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
190
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
Cronbach's
Alpha Based on
Standardized
Items N of Items
,861 ,869 4
Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
INTEREST VALUE 1 5,57 ,858 30
INTEREST VALUE 2 5,53 ,681 30
INTEREST VALUE 3 5,53 1,074 30
INTEREST VALUE 4 5,67 ,922 30
Inter-Item Correlation Matrix
INTEREST
VALUE 1
INTEREST
VALUE 2
INTEREST
VALUE 3
INTEREST
VALUE 4
INTEREST VALUE 1 1,000 ,645 ,521 ,682
INTEREST VALUE 2 ,645 1,000 ,587 ,567
INTEREST VALUE 3 ,521 ,587 1,000 ,743
INTEREST VALUE 4 ,682 ,567 ,743 1,000
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance
if Item Deleted
Corrected Item-
Total Correlation
Squared
Multiple
Correlation
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
INTEREST VALUE 1 16,73 5,513 ,694 ,569 ,828
INTEREST VALUE 2 16,77 6,254 ,683 ,502 ,842
INTEREST VALUE 3 16,77 4,599 ,714 ,597 ,831
Total 30 100,0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in
the procedure.
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
191
INTEREST VALUE 4 16,63 4,930 ,797 ,671 ,783
Employer Attractiveness – Development Value
Uji Validitas
KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,751
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 42,518
df 6
Sig. ,000
Anti-image Matrices
DEVELOP
VALUE 1
DEVELOP
VALUE 2
DEVELOP
VALUE 3
DEVELOP
VALUE 4
Anti-image Covariance DEVELOP VALUE 1 ,554 -,202 -,188 ,040
DEVELOP VALUE 2 -,202 ,425 -,074 -,231
DEVELOP VALUE 3 -,188 -,074 ,566 -,149
DEVELOP VALUE 4 ,040 -,231 -,149 ,538
Anti-image Correlation DEVELOP VALUE 1 ,746a -,416 -,336 ,073
DEVELOP VALUE 2 -,416 ,721a -,150 -,484
DEVELOP VALUE 3 -,336 -,150 ,813a -,270
DEVELOP VALUE 4 ,073 -,484 -,270 ,735a
a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)
Communalities
Initial Extraction
DEVELOP VALUE 1 1,000 ,621
DEVELOP VALUE 2 1,000 ,760
DEVELOP VALUE 3 1,000 ,657
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
192
Component Matrixa
Component
1
DEVELOP VALUE 1 ,788
DEVELOP VALUE 2 ,872
DEVELOP VALUE 3 ,810
DEVELOP VALUE 4 ,791
Extraction Method: Principal
Component Analysis.
a. 1 components extracted.
Total Variance Explained
Component
Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %
1 2,663 66,580 66,580 2,663 66,580 66,580
2 ,598 14,962 81,542
3 ,457 11,414 92,956
4 ,282 7,044 100,000
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Employer Attractiveness – Development Value
Uji Reabilitas
DEVELOP VALUE 4 1,000 ,625
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 30 100,0
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
193
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
Cronbach's
Alpha Based on
Standardized
Items N of Items
,832 ,832 4
Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
DEVELOP VALUE 1 6,03 ,809 30
DEVELOP VALUE 2 5,60 ,932 30
DEVELOP VALUE 3 5,97 ,765 30
DEVELOP VALUE 4 5,90 ,845 30
Inter-Item Correlation Matrix
DEVELOP
VALUE 1
DEVELOP
VALUE 2
DEVELOP
VALUE 3
DEVELOP
VALUE 4
DEVELOP VALUE 1 1,000 ,613 ,559 ,409
DEVELOP VALUE 2 ,613 1,000 ,561 ,648
DEVELOP VALUE 3 ,559 ,561 1,000 ,528
DEVELOP VALUE 4 ,409 ,648 ,528 1,000
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance
if Item Deleted
Corrected Item-
Total Correlation
Squared
Multiple
Correlation
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
DEVELOP VALUE 1 17,47 4,671 ,622 ,446 ,804
DEVELOP VALUE 2 17,90 3,886 ,747 ,575 ,746
DEVELOP VALUE 3 17,53 4,740 ,653 ,434 ,792
DEVELOP VALUE 4 17,60 4,524 ,629 ,462 ,801
Excludeda 0 ,0
Total 30 100,0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in
the procedure.
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
194
Employer Attractiveness – Social Value
Uji Validitas
KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,851
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 82,217
df 10
Sig. ,000
Anti-image Matrices
SOS
VALUE 1
SOS
VALUE 2
SOS
VALUE 3
SOS
VALUE 4
SOS
VALUE 5
Anti-image Covariance SOS VALUE 1 ,441 -,065 -,082 -,058 -,115
SOS VALUE 2 -,065 ,320 -,166 -,007 -,033
SOS VALUE 3 -,082 -,166 ,250 -,114 -,015
SOS VALUE 4 -,058 -,007 -,114 ,439 -,143
SOS VALUE 5 -,115 -,033 -,015 -,143 ,572
Anti-image Correlation SOS VALUE 1 ,909a -,174 -,248 -,132 -,228
SOS VALUE 2 -,174 ,820a -,588 -,020 -,077
SOS VALUE 3 -,248 -,588 ,788a -,343 -,040
SOS VALUE 4 -,132 -,020 -,343 ,880a -,285
SOS VALUE 5 -,228 -,077 -,040 -,285 ,899a
a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)
Communalities
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
195
Component Matrixa
Component
1
SOS VALUE 1 ,841
SOS VALUE 2 ,863
SOS VALUE 3 ,905
SOS VALUE 4 ,834
SOS VALUE 5 ,757
Extraction Method: Principal
Component Analysis.
a. 1 components extracted.
Total Variance Explained
Component
Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance
Cumulative
%
1 3,542 70,843 70,843 3,542 70,843 70,843
2 ,549 10,970 81,813
3 ,394 7,873 89,686
4 ,346 6,916 96,602
5 ,170 3,398 100,000
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Employer Attractiveness – Social Value
Initial Extraction
SOS VALUE 1 1,000 ,708
SOS VALUE 2 1,000 ,745
SOS VALUE 3 1,000 ,819
SOS VALUE 4 1,000 ,696
SOS VALUE 5 1,000 ,573
Extraction Method: Principal Component
Analysis.
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
196
Uji Reabilitas
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
Cronbach's
Alpha Based on
Standardized
Items N of Items
,893 ,896 5
Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
SOS VALUE 1 6,17 ,834 30
SOS VALUE 2 5,97 ,765 30
SOS VALUE 3 5,97 ,718 30
SOS VALUE 4 5,83 ,874 30
SOS VALUE 5 5,70 ,837 30
Inter-Item Correlation Matrix
SOS VALUE 1 SOS VALUE 2 SOS VALUE 3 SOS VALUE 4 SOS VALUE 5
SOS VALUE 1 1,000 ,658 ,700 ,607 ,568
SOS VALUE 2 ,658 1,000 ,814 ,610 ,523
SOS VALUE 3 ,700 ,814 1,000 ,705 ,556
SOS VALUE 4 ,607 ,610 ,705 1,000 ,589
SOS VALUE 5 ,568 ,523 ,556 ,589 1,000
Item-Total Statistics
Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 30 100,0
Excludeda 0 ,0
Total 30 100,0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in
the procedure.
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
197
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance
if Item Deleted
Corrected Item-
Total Correlation
Squared
Multiple
Correlation
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
SOS VALUE 1 23,47 7,361 ,742 ,559 ,869
SOS VALUE 2 23,67 7,609 ,763 ,680 ,864
SOS VALUE 3 23,67 7,609 ,829 ,750 ,852
SOS VALUE 4 23,80 7,200 ,735 ,561 ,871
SOS VALUE 5 23,93 7,720 ,644 ,428 ,891
Employer Attractiveness – Economic Value
Uji Validitas
KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,723
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 38,751
df 3
Sig. ,000
Anti-image Matrices
ECO VALUE 1 ECO VALUE 2 ECO VALUE 3
Anti-image Covariance ECO VALUE 1 ,509 -,119 -,187
ECO VALUE 2 -,119 ,442 -,221
ECO VALUE 3 -,187 -,221 ,388
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
198
Anti-image Correlation ECO VALUE 1 ,778a -,250 -,420
ECO VALUE 2 -,250 ,724a -,534
ECO VALUE 3 -,420 -,534 ,681a
a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)
Component Matrixa
Component
1
ECO VALUE 1 ,861
ECO VALUE 2 ,884
ECO VALUE 3 ,908
Extraction Method: Principal
Component Analysis.
a. 1 components extracted.
Total Variance Explained
Component
Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %
1 2,348 78,268 78,268 2,348 78,268 78,268
2 ,389 12,969 91,237
3 ,263 8,763 100,000
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Employer Attractiveness – Economic Value
Communalities
Initial Extraction
ECO VALUE 1 1,000 ,741
ECO VALUE 2 1,000 ,782
ECO VALUE 3 1,000 ,825
Extraction Method: Principal Component
Analysis.
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
199
Uji Reabilitas
Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
ECO VALUE 1 5,70 ,837 30
ECO VALUE 2 5,73 ,907 30
ECO VALUE 3 5,80 ,805 30
Inter-Item Correlation Matrix
ECO VALUE 1 ECO VALUE 2 ECO VALUE 3
ECO VALUE 1 1,000 ,618 ,676
ECO VALUE 2 ,618 1,000 ,727
ECO VALUE 3 ,676 ,727 1,000
Item-Total Statistics
Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 30 100,0
Excludeda 0 ,0
Total 30 100,0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the
procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
Cronbach's Alpha
Based on
Standardized Items N of Items
,859 ,861 3
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
200
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance
if Item Deleted
Corrected Item-
Total Correlation
Squared
Multiple
Correlation
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
ECO VALUE 1 11,53 2,533 ,694 ,491 ,838
ECO VALUE 2 11,50 2,259 ,733 ,558 ,806
ECO VALUE 3 11,43 2,461 ,781 ,612 ,762
Employer Attractiveness – Application Value
Uji Validitas
KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,671
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 19,924
df 3
Sig. ,000
Anti-image Matrices
APP VALUE 2 APP VALUE 3 APP VALUE 4
Anti-image Covariance APP VALUE 2 ,742 -,193 -,148
APP VALUE 3 -,193 ,592 -,296
APP VALUE 4 -,148 -,296 ,616
Anti-image Correlation APP VALUE 2 ,755a -,292 -,219
APP VALUE 3 -,292 ,638a -,490
APP VALUE 4 -,219 -,490 ,652a
a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)
Communalities
Initial Extraction
APP VALUE 2 1,000 ,579
APP VALUE 3 1,000 ,725
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
201
Component Matrixa
Component
1
APP VALUE 2 ,761
APP VALUE 3 ,852
APP VALUE 4 ,835
Extraction Method: Principal
Component Analysis.
a. 1 components extracted.
Total Variance Explained
Component
Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %
1 2,002 66,733 66,733 2,002 66,733 66,733
2 ,594 19,815 86,548
3 ,404 13,452 100,000
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Employer Attractiveness – Application Value
Uji Reabilitas
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
Cronbach's
Alpha Based on
Standardized
Items N of Items
,748 ,750 3
APP VALUE 4 1,000 ,697
Extraction Method: Principal Component
Analysis.
Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 30 100,0
Excludeda 0 ,0
Total 30 100,0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in
the procedure.
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
202
Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
APP VALUE 2 5,73 ,740 30
APP VALUE 3 5,63 ,999 30
APP VALUE 4 5,47 ,937 30
Inter-Item Correlation Matrix
APP VALUE 2 APP VALUE 3 APP VALUE 4
APP VALUE 2 1,000 ,470 ,434
APP VALUE 3 ,470 1,000 ,594
APP VALUE 4 ,434 ,594 1,000
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance
if Item Deleted
Corrected Item-
Total Correlation
Squared
Multiple
Correlation
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
APP VALUE 2 11,10 2,990 ,507 ,258 ,744
APP VALUE 3 11,20 2,028 ,635 ,408 ,594
APP VALUE 4 11,37 2,240 ,611 ,384 ,620
Employer Used Of Social Media
Uji Validitas
KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,784
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 73,643
df 6
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
203
Sig. ,000
Anti-image Matrices
USED 1 USED 2 USED 3 USED 4
Anti-image Covariance USED 1 ,817 -,102 -,044 ,054
USED 2 -,102 ,234 -,105 -,109
USED 3 -,044 -,105 ,242 -,112
USED 4 ,054 -,109 -,112 ,254
Anti-image Correlation USED 1 ,835a -,232 -,099 ,118
USED 2 -,232 ,775a -,441 -,446
USED 3 -,099 -,441 ,787a -,452
USED 4 ,118 -,446 -,452 ,777a
a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)
Component Matrixa
Component
1
USED 1 ,537
USED 2 ,938
USED 3 ,930
USED 4 ,912
Extraction Method:
Principal Component
Analysis.
a. 1 components
extracted.
Total Variance Explained
Component Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Communalities
Initial Extraction
USED 1 1,000 ,288
USED 2 1,000 ,879
USED 3 1,000 ,865
USED 4 1,000 ,832
Extraction Method: Principal
Component Analysis.
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
204
Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %
1 2,863 71,587 71,587 2,863 71,587 71,587
2 ,802 20,045 91,632
3 ,170 4,260 95,892
4 ,164 4,108 100,000
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Employer Used Of Social Media
Tes Reliabilitas
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
Cronbach's
Alpha Based on
Standardized
Items N of Items
,866 ,854 4
Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
USED 1 5,63 ,765 30
USED 2 5,60 1,380 30
USED 3 5,63 1,217 30
USED 4 5,53 1,196 30
Inter-Item Correlation Matrix
USED 1 USED 2 USED 3 USED 4
USED 1 1,000 ,412 ,369 ,297
USED 2 ,412 1,000 ,834 ,824
USED 3 ,369 ,834 1,000 ,826
Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 30 100,0
Excludeda 0 ,0
Total 30 100,0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in
the procedure.
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
205
USED 4 ,297 ,824 ,826 1,000
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance
if Item Deleted
Corrected Item-
Total Correlation
Squared
Multiple
Correlation
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
USED 1 16,77 12,737 ,384 ,183 ,933
USED 2 16,80 7,131 ,867 ,766 ,765
USED 3 16,77 8,047 ,853 ,758 ,770
USED 4 16,87 8,326 ,821 ,746 ,785
Corporate Reputation
Uji Validitas
KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,660
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 43,268
df 6
Sig. ,000
Anti-image Matrices
CORP 1 CORP 2 CORP 3 CORP 4
Anti-image Covariance CORP 1 ,634 ,130 -,211 -,080
CORP 2 ,130 ,455 -,242 -,038
CORP 3 -,211 -,242 ,303 -,139
CORP 4 -,080 -,038 -,139 ,640
Anti-image Correlation CORP 1 ,646a ,242 -,481 -,125
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
206
CORP 2 ,242 ,618a -,651 -,070
CORP 3 -,481 -,651 ,610a -,317
CORP 4 -,125 -,070 -,317 ,856a
a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)
Component Matrixa
Component
1
CORP 1 ,686
CORP 2 ,782
CORP 3 ,921
CORP 4 ,770
Extraction Method:
Principal Component
Analysis.
a. 1 components
extracted.
Total Variance Explained
Component
Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %
1 2,524 63,092 63,092 2,524 63,092 63,092
2 ,740 18,493 81,585
3 ,538 13,453 95,038
4 ,198 4,962 100,000
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Corporate Reputation
Uji Reliabilitas
Communalities
Initial Extraction
CORP 1 1,000 ,470
CORP 2 1,000 ,611
CORP 3 1,000 ,849
CORP 4 1,000 ,594
Extraction Method: Principal
Component Analysis.
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
207
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
Cronbach's
Alpha Based on
Standardized
Items N of Items
,790 ,800 4
Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
CORP 1 5,53 1,137 30
CORP 2 6,23 ,817 30
CORP 3 5,83 ,950 30
CORP 4 5,70 ,952 30
Inter-Item Correlation Matrix
CORP 1 CORP 2 CORP 3 CORP 4
CORP 1 1,000 ,270 ,564 ,408
CORP 2 ,270 1,000 ,718 ,448
CORP 3 ,564 ,718 1,000 ,591
CORP 4 ,408 ,448 ,591 1,000
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance
if Item Deleted
Corrected Item-
Total Correlation
Squared
Multiple
Correlation
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
CORP 1 17,77 5,357 ,495 ,366 ,806
CORP 2 17,07 6,271 ,565 ,545 ,758
Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 30 100,0
Excludeda 0 ,0
Total 30 100,0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in
the procedure.
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
208
CORP 3 17,47 4,947 ,805 ,697 ,631
CORP 4 17,60 5,697 ,583 ,360 ,746
Intention To Apply For A Job
Uji Validitas
KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,666
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 79,159
df 10
Sig. ,000
Anti-image Matrices
INTENT 1 INTENT 2 INTENT 3 INTENT 4 INTENT 5
Anti-image Covariance INTENT 1 ,629 -,099 ,057 -,010 -,134
INTENT 2 -,099 ,331 ,091 -,137 -,180
INTENT 3 ,057 ,091 ,286 -,209 -,140
INTENT 4 -,010 -,137 -,209 ,282 ,065
INTENT 5 -,134 -,180 -,140 ,065 ,308
Anti-image Correlation INTENT 1 ,825a -,217 ,136 -,023 -,303
INTENT 2 -,217 ,684a ,297 -,449 -,565
INTENT 3 ,136 ,297 ,589a -,735 -,471
INTENT 4 -,023 -,449 -,735 ,634a ,221
INTENT 5 -,303 -,565 -,471 ,221 ,691a
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
209
a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA) Component Matrixa
Component
1
INTENT 1 ,629
INTENT 2 ,849
INTENT 3 ,784
INTENT 4 ,823
INTENT 5 ,875
Extraction Method: Principal
Component Analysis.
a. 1 components extracted.
Communalities
Initial Extraction
INTENT 1 1,000 ,395
INTENT 2 1,000 ,721
INTENT 3 1,000 ,614
INTENT 4 1,000 ,677
INTENT 5 1,000 ,765
Extraction Method: Principal
Component Analysis.
Total Variance Explained
Component
Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %
1 3,173 63,459 63,459 3,173 63,459 63,459
2 ,977 19,543 83,002
3 ,400 7,994 90,997
4 ,325 6,499 97,495
5 ,125 2,505 100,000
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Intention To Apply For A Job
Uji Reliabilitas
Case Processing Summary
N %
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
210
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
Cronbach's
Alpha Based on
Standardized
Items N of Items
,846 ,852 5
Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
INTENT 1 5,90 ,845 30
INTENT 2 6,07 ,828 30
INTENT 3 5,50 1,196 30
INTENT 4 5,73 1,015 30
INTENT 5 6,03 ,890 30
Inter-Item Correlation Matrix
INTENT 1 INTENT 2 INTENT 3 INTENT 4 INTENT 5
INTENT 1 1,000 ,552 ,222 ,290 ,555
INTENT 2 ,552 1,000 ,453 ,597 ,746
INTENT 3 ,222 ,453 1,000 ,795 ,599
INTENT 4 ,290 ,597 ,795 1,000 ,545
INTENT 5 ,555 ,746 ,599 ,545 1,000
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance
if Item Deleted
Corrected Item-
Total Correlation
Squared
Multiple
Correlation
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
INTENT 1 23,33 11,126 ,453 ,371 ,861
INTENT 2 23,17 9,937 ,723 ,669 ,801
INTENT 3 23,73 8,409 ,656 ,714 ,823
Cases Valid 30 100,0
Excludeda 0 ,0
Total 30 100,0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in
the procedure.
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
211
INTENT 4 23,50 8,948 ,727 ,718 ,794
INTENT 5 23,20 9,407 ,768 ,692 ,786
Job Characteristics - Autonomy
Uji Validitas
KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,524
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 39,502
df 3
Sig. ,000
Anti-image Matrices
AUTONOMY 1 AUTONOMY 2 AUTONOMY 3
Anti-image Covariance AUTONOMY 1 ,796 -,169 ,085
AUTONOMY 2 -,169 ,251 -,223
AUTONOMY 3 ,085 -,223 ,284
Anti-image Correlation AUTONOMY 1 ,588a -,378 ,178
AUTONOMY 2 -,378 ,514a -,833
AUTONOMY 3 ,178 -,833 ,517a
a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
212
Total Variance Explained
Component
Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %
1 2,064 68,807 68,807 2,064 68,807 68,807
2 ,793 26,437 95,243
3 ,143 4,757 100,000
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Job Characteristics - Autonomy
Uji Reliabilitas
Component Matrixa
Component
1
AUTONOMY 1 ,600
AUTONOMY 2 ,947
AUTONOMY 3 ,898
Extraction Method: Principal
Component Analysis.
a. 1 components extracted.
Communalities
Initial Extraction
AUTONOMY 1 1,000 ,360
AUTONOMY 2 1,000 ,897
AUTONOMY 3 1,000 ,807
Extraction Method: Principal Component
Analysis.
Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 30 100,0
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
213
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
Cronbach's
Alpha Based on
Standardized
Items N of Items
,761 ,757 3
Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
AUTONOMY 1 6,03 ,890 30
AUTONOMY 2 5,73 ,944 30
AUTONOMY 3 5,57 ,935 30
Inter-Item Correlation Matrix
AUTONOMY 1 AUTONOMY 2 AUTONOMY 3
AUTONOMY 1 1,000 ,421 ,267
AUTONOMY 2 ,421 1,000 ,841
AUTONOMY 3 ,267 ,841 1,000
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance
if Item Deleted
Corrected Item-
Total Correlation
Squared
Multiple
Correlation
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
AUTONOMY 1 11,30 3,252 ,359 ,204 ,913
AUTONOMY 2 11,60 2,110 ,799 ,749 ,420
AUTONOMY 3 11,77 2,392 ,667 ,716 ,592
Excludeda 0 ,0
Total 30 100,0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in
the procedure.
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
214
Job Characteristics - Feedback
Uji Validitas
KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,712
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 43,744
df 3
Sig. ,000
Anti-image Matrices
FEEDBACK 1 FEEDBACK 2 FEEDBACK 3
Anti-image Covariance FEEDBACK 1 ,528 -,154 -,090
FEEDBACK 2 -,154 ,326 -,220
FEEDBACK 3 -,090 -,220 ,363
Anti-image Correlation FEEDBACK 1 ,822a -,372 -,207
FEEDBACK 2 -,372 ,662a -,639
FEEDBACK 3 -,207 -,639 ,691a
a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)
Communalities
Initial Extraction
FEEDBACK 1 1,000 ,722
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
215
Component Matrixa
Component
1
FEEDBACK 1 ,850
FEEDBACK 2 ,922
FEEDBACK 3 ,904
Extraction Method: Principal
Component Analysis.
a. 1 components extracted.
Job Characteristics - Feedback
Uji Reliabilitas
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
Cronbach's
Alpha Based on
Standardized
Items N of Items
,870 ,872 3
Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
FEEDBACK 1 5,80 ,925 30
FEEDBACK 2 5,93 ,868 30
FEEDBACK 3 5,80 ,887 30
Inter-Item Correlation Matrix
FEEDBACK 2 1,000 ,851
FEEDBACK 3 1,000 ,817
Extraction Method: Principal Component
Analysis.
Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 30 100,0
Excludeda 0 ,0
Total 30 100,0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in
the procedure.
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
216
FEEDBACK 1 FEEDBACK 2 FEEDBACK 3
FEEDBACK 1 1,000 ,670 ,622
FEEDBACK 2 ,670 1,000 ,788
FEEDBACK 3 ,622 ,788 1,000
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance
if Item Deleted
Corrected Item-
Total Correlation
Squared
Multiple
Correlation
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
FEEDBACK 1 11,73 2,754 ,683 ,472 ,881
FEEDBACK 2 11,60 2,662 ,808 ,674 ,767
FEEDBACK 3 11,73 2,685 ,769 ,637 ,801
Job Characteristics – Knowledge Of Result
Uji Validitas
KMO and Bartlett's Test
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. ,680
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity Approx. Chi-Square 24,195
df 3
Sig. ,000
Anti-image Matrices
KNOWLEDGE 1 KNOWLEDGE 2 KNOWLEDGE 3
Anti-image Covariance KNOWLEDGE 1 ,682 -,216 -,119
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
217
KNOWLEDGE 2 -,216 ,523 -,281
KNOWLEDGE 3 -,119 -,281 ,581
Anti-image Correlation KNOWLEDGE 1 ,754a -,362 -,188
KNOWLEDGE 2 -,362 ,639a -,510
KNOWLEDGE 3 -,188 -,510 ,675a
a. Measures of Sampling Adequacy(MSA)
Communalities
Initial Extraction
KNOWLEDGE 1 1,000 ,623
KNOWLEDGE 2 1,000 ,766
KNOWLEDGE 3 1,000 ,705
Extraction Method: Principal Component
Analysis.
Total Variance Explained
Component
Initial Eigenvalues Extraction Sums of Squared Loadings
Total % of Variance Cumulative % Total % of Variance Cumulative %
1 2,094 69,802 69,802 2,094 69,802 69,802
2 ,549 18,296 88,098
3 ,357 11,902 100,000
Component Matrixa
Component
1
KNOWLEDGE 1 ,790
KNOWLEDGE 2 ,875
KNOWLEDGE 3 ,840
Extraction Method: Principal
Component Analysis.
a. 1 components extracted.
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
218
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis.
Job Characteristics – Knowledge Of Result
Uji Reliabilitas
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha
Cronbach's
Alpha Based on
Standardized
Items N of Items
,781 ,783 3
Item Statistics
Mean Std. Deviation N
KNOWLEDGE 1 5,90 ,845 30
KNOWLEDGE 2 5,83 ,791 30
KNOWLEDGE 3 5,77 ,817 30
Inter-Item Correlation Matrix
KNOWLEDGE 1 KNOWLEDGE 2 KNOWLEDGE 3
KNOWLEDGE 1 1,000 ,541 ,464
KNOWLEDGE 2 ,541 1,000 ,631
KNOWLEDGE 3 ,464 ,631 1,000
Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 30 100,0
Excludeda 0 ,0
Total 30 100,0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in
the procedure.
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
219
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance
if Item Deleted
Corrected Item-
Total Correlation
Squared
Multiple
Correlation
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
KNOWLEDGE 1 11,60 2,110 ,556 ,318 ,773
KNOWLEDGE 2 11,67 2,023 ,684 ,477 ,634
KNOWLEDGE 3 11,73 2,064 ,621 ,419 ,702
Data Main Test (Measurement)
Data Uji Validitas dan Reabilitas
Estimates (Group number 1 - Default model)
Scalar Estimates (Group number 1 - Default model)
Maximum Likelihood Estimates
Regression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model)
Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label
IV <--- EA 1,166 ,129 9,063 ***
DV <--- EA ,975 ,114 8,531 ***
SV <--- EA ,977 ,114 8,551 ***
EV <--- EA 1,039 ,117 8,862 ***
AV <--- EA 1,000
IV4 <--- IV 1,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
220
Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label
IV3 <--- IV ,986 ,075 13,102 ***
IV2 <--- IV ,883 ,065 13,523 ***
IV1 <--- IV ,852 ,072 11,858 ***
DV4 <--- DV 1,000
DV3 <--- DV 1,144 ,093 12,346 ***
DV2 <--- DV 1,153 ,092 12,584 ***
DV1 <--- DV 1,012 ,092 10,990 ***
SV4 <--- SV 1,000
SV3 <--- SV 1,016 ,077 13,223 ***
SV2 <--- SV ,922 ,078 11,748 ***
SV1 <--- SV ,914 ,082 11,189 ***
SV5 <--- SV ,894 ,091 9,859 ***
EV3 <--- EV 1,000
EV2 <--- EV 1,067 ,083 12,848 ***
EV1 <--- EV ,968 ,082 11,794 ***
CR1 <--- CR 1,000
CR2 <--- CR 1,019 ,096 10,601 ***
CR3 <--- CR 1,218 ,121 10,032 ***
CR4 <--- CR 1,335 ,119 11,214 ***
USM1 <--- USM 1,000
USM2 <--- USM ,961 ,066 14,652 ***
USM3 <--- USM ,990 ,066 15,069 ***
USM4 <--- USM 1,017 ,066 15,482 ***
ITAJ2 <--- ITAJ 1,000
ITAJ3 <--- ITAJ ,944 ,069 13,631 ***
ITAJ4 <--- ITAJ ,843 ,066 12,725 ***
ITAJ1 <--- ITAJ ,884 ,070 12,669 ***
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
221
Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label
JC2 <--- JC 1,000
JC3 <--- JC 1,031 ,100 10,271 ***
JC4 <--- JC 1,052 ,105 10,030 ***
JC5 <--- JC ,994 ,097 10,217 ***
AV2 <--- AV 1,082 ,098 11,002 ***
AV1 <--- AV 1,000
AV3 <--- AV 1,162 ,097 11,978 ***
ITAJ5 <--- ITAJ ,743 ,063 11,741 ***
JC1 <--- JC 1,125 ,104 10,823 ***
JC6 <--- JC 1,077 ,099 10,898 ***
Standardized Regression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model)
Estimate
IV <--- EA ,847
DV <--- EA ,839
SV <--- EA ,797
EV <--- EA ,850
AV <--- EA ,861
IV4 <--- IV ,828
IV3 <--- IV ,812
IV2 <--- IV ,831
IV1 <--- IV ,755
DV4 <--- DV ,764
DV3 <--- DV ,844
DV2 <--- DV ,859
DV1 <--- DV ,762
SV4 <--- SV ,809
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
222
Estimate
SV3 <--- SV ,841
SV2 <--- SV ,768
SV1 <--- SV ,738
SV5 <--- SV ,667
EV3 <--- EV ,808
EV2 <--- EV ,843
EV1 <--- EV ,783
CR1 <--- CR ,735
CR2 <--- CR ,779
CR3 <--- CR ,738
CR4 <--- CR ,825
USM1 <--- USM ,798
USM2 <--- USM ,886
USM3 <--- USM ,903
USM4 <--- USM ,921
ITAJ2 <--- ITAJ ,829
ITAJ3 <--- ITAJ ,816
ITAJ4 <--- ITAJ ,778
ITAJ1 <--- ITAJ ,776
JC2 <--- JC ,731
JC3 <--- JC ,743
JC4 <--- JC ,727
JC5 <--- JC ,739
AV2 <--- AV ,793
AV1 <--- AV ,749
AV3 <--- AV ,869
ITAJ5 <--- ITAJ ,735
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
223
Estimate
JC1 <--- JC ,781
JC6 <--- JC ,787
Intercepts: (Group number 1 - Default model)
Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label
IV4
5,482 ,072 76,251 ***
IV3
5,487 ,072 75,944 ***
IV2
5,508 ,063 87,046 ***
IV1
5,487 ,067 81,708 ***
DV4
5,693 ,066 86,602 ***
DV3
5,618 ,068 82,443 ***
DV2
5,538 ,067 82,053 ***
DV1
5,673 ,067 84,943 ***
SV4
5,824 ,065 88,971 ***
SV3
5,819 ,064 90,896 ***
SV2
5,796 ,064 91,045 ***
SV1
5,804 ,066 88,529 ***
SV5
5,573 ,071 78,478 ***
EV3
5,739 ,065 87,778 ***
EV2
5,588 ,067 83,559 ***
EV1
5,593 ,065 85,646 ***
CR1
5,784 ,072 80,049 ***
CR2
5,693 ,069 81,925 ***
CR3
5,382 ,088 61,375 ***
CR4
5,457 ,086 63,460 ***
USM1
5,256 ,104 50,437 ***
USM2
5,241 ,090 58,120 ***
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
224
Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label
USM3
5,211 ,091 57,190 ***
USM4
5,296 ,092 57,743 ***
ITAJ2
5,447 ,080 68,223 ***
ITAJ3
5,558 ,077 72,573 ***
ITAJ4
5,719 ,072 79,820 ***
ITAJ5
5,739 ,067 85,765 ***
ITAJ1
5,724 ,075 75,945 ***
JC2
5,719 ,063 91,400 ***
JC3
5,688 ,063 89,637 ***
JC4
5,774 ,066 87,181 ***
JC5
5,774 ,061 93,948 ***
JC1
5,754 ,066 87,357 ***
JC6
5,794 ,063 92,512 ***
AV2
5,653 ,069 82,487 ***
AV1
5,648 ,067 84,183 ***
AV3
5,673 ,067 84,464 ***
Covariances: (Group number 1 - Default model)
Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label
EA <--> USM ,410 ,074 5,562 ***
EA <--> JC ,349 ,054 6,511 ***
CR <--> ITAJ ,595 ,084 7,066 ***
USM <--> ITAJ ,658 ,107 6,176 ***
ITAJ <--> JC ,495 ,071 6,991 ***
CR <--> JC ,311 ,053 5,852 ***
CR <--> USM ,536 ,091 5,916 ***
USM <--> JC ,319 ,068 4,678 ***
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
225
Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label
EA <--> CR ,347 ,057 6,111 ***
EA <--> ITAJ ,493 ,073 6,803 ***
Correlations: (Group number 1 - Default model)
Estimate
EA <--> USM ,576
EA <--> JC ,891
CR <--> ITAJ ,854
USM <--> ITAJ ,604
ITAJ <--> JC ,826
CR <--> JC ,646
CR <--> USM ,613
USM <--> JC ,424
EA <--> CR ,763
EA <--> ITAJ ,871
Variances: (Group number 1 - Default model)
Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label
CR
,559 ,097 5,780 ***
USM
1,369 ,205 6,664 ***
ITAJ
,867 ,123 7,024 ***
JC
,414 ,071 5,809 ***
EA
,370 ,072 5,132 ***
e39
,198 ,039 5,135 ***
e40
,148 ,030 4,927 ***
e41
,203 ,037 5,510 ***
e42
,153 ,033 4,694 ***
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
226
Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label
e46
,130 ,030 4,339 ***
e1
,322 ,042 7,621 ***
e2
,352 ,045 7,885 ***
e3
,246 ,032 7,567 ***
e4
,384 ,045 8,546 ***
e5
,356 ,042 8,503 ***
e6
,265 ,036 7,369 ***
e7
,237 ,034 7,020 ***
e8
,371 ,044 8,528 ***
e9
,293 ,037 7,831 ***
e10
,237 ,033 7,248 ***
e11
,328 ,039 8,335 ***
e12
,387 ,045 8,625 ***
e13
,554 ,061 9,069 ***
e14
,294 ,039 7,462 ***
e15
,256 ,038 6,683 ***
e16
,327 ,042 7,869 ***
e20
,475 ,056 8,517 ***
e21
,376 ,047 8,056 ***
e22
,693 ,082 8,492 ***
e23
,468 ,064 7,323 ***
e24
,782 ,088 8,842 ***
e25
,347 ,046 7,582 ***
e26
,302 ,043 7,031 ***
e27
,251 ,040 6,269 ***
e28
,395 ,048 8,226 ***
e29
,389 ,046 8,395 ***
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
227
Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label
e30
,401 ,046 8,757 ***
e31
,407 ,045 9,042 ***
e32
,447 ,051 8,775 ***
e33
,361 ,041 8,903 ***
e34
,357 ,040 8,823 ***
e35
,410 ,046 8,930 ***
e36
,339 ,038 8,848 ***
e37
,335 ,039 8,512 ***
e38
,296 ,035 8,461 ***
e43
,345 ,044 7,770 ***
e44
,392 ,047 8,333 ***
e47
,218 ,037 5,960 ***
Matrices (Group number 1 - Default model)
Total Effects (Group number 1 - Default model)
JC
ITA
J
US
M CR EA AV EV SV DV IV
AV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,03
9 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,977 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,975 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,16
6 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,16
2
1,16
2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,00 1,00 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
228
JC
ITA
J
US
M CR EA AV EV SV DV IV
0 0
AV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,08
2
1,08
2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC6 1,07
7 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC1 1,12
5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC5 ,994 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC4 1,05
2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC3 1,03
1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC2 1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ
1 ,000 ,884 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ
5 ,000 ,743 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ
4 ,000 ,843 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ
3 ,000 ,944 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ
2 ,000
1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM
4 ,000 ,000
1,01
7 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM
3 ,000 ,000 ,990 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM
2 ,000 ,000 ,961 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM
1 ,000 ,000
1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
229
JC
ITA
J
US
M CR EA AV EV SV DV IV
CR4 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,33
5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR3 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,21
8 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR2 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,01
9 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR1 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,00
5 ,000 ,968 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,10
9 ,000
1,06
7 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,03
9 ,000
1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,873 ,000 ,000 ,894 ,000 ,000
SV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,892 ,000 ,000 ,914 ,000 ,000
SV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,900 ,000 ,000 ,922 ,000 ,000
SV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,993 ,000 ,000 1,01
6 ,000 ,000
SV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,977 ,000 ,000 1,00
0 ,000 ,000
DV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,987 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,01
2 ,000
DV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,12
4 ,000 ,000 ,000
1,15
3 ,000
DV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,11
5 ,000 ,000 ,000
1,14
4 ,000
DV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,975 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,00
0 ,000
IV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,993 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,852
IV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,03
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,883
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
230
JC
ITA
J
US
M CR EA AV EV SV DV IV
IV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,14
9 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,986
IV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,16
6 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
1,00
0
Standardized Total Effects (Group number 1 - Default model)
JC ITAJ USM CR EA AV EV SV DV IV
AV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,861 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,850 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,797 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,839 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,847 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,748 ,869 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,644 ,749 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,683 ,793 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC6 ,787 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC1 ,781 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC5 ,739 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC4 ,727 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC3 ,743 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC2 ,731 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ1 ,000 ,776 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ5 ,000 ,735 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ4 ,000 ,778 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ3 ,000 ,816 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ2 ,000 ,829 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM4 ,000 ,000 ,921 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
231
JC ITAJ USM CR EA AV EV SV DV IV
USM3 ,000 ,000 ,903 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM2 ,000 ,000 ,886 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM1 ,000 ,000 ,798 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,825 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,738 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,779 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,735 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,666 ,000 ,783 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,717 ,000 ,843 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,687 ,000 ,808 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,532 ,000 ,000 ,667 ,000 ,000
SV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,589 ,000 ,000 ,738 ,000 ,000
SV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,612 ,000 ,000 ,768 ,000 ,000
SV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,671 ,000 ,000 ,841 ,000 ,000
SV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,645 ,000 ,000 ,809 ,000 ,000
DV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,639 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,762 ,000
DV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,720 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,859 ,000
DV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,708 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,844 ,000
DV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,641 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,764 ,000
IV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,640 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,755
IV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,704 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,831
IV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,688 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,812
IV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,701 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,828
Direct Effects (Group number 1 - Default model)
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
232
JC
ITA
J
US
M CR EA AV EV SV DV IV
AV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,03
9 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,977 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,975 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,16
6 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,16
2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,08
2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC6 1,07
7 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC1 1,12
5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC5 ,994 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC4 1,05
2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC3 1,03
1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC2 1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ
1 ,000 ,884 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ
5 ,000 ,743 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ
4 ,000 ,843 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ ,000 ,944 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
233
JC
ITA
J
US
M CR EA AV EV SV DV IV
3
ITAJ
2 ,000
1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM
4 ,000 ,000
1,01
7 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM
3 ,000 ,000 ,990 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM
2 ,000 ,000 ,961 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM
1 ,000 ,000
1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR4 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,33
5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR3 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,21
8 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR2 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,01
9 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR1 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,968 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,06
7 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,894 ,000 ,000
SV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,914 ,000 ,000
SV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,922 ,000 ,000
SV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,01
6 ,000 ,000
SV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,00
0 ,000 ,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
234
JC
ITA
J
US
M CR EA AV EV SV DV IV
DV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,01
2 ,000
DV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,15
3 ,000
DV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,14
4 ,000
DV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,00
0 ,000
IV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,852
IV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,883
IV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,986
IV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,00
0
Standardized Direct Effects (Group number 1 - Default model)
JC ITAJ USM CR EA AV EV SV DV IV
AV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,861 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,850 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,797 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,839 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,847 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,869 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,749 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,793 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC6 ,787 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC1 ,781 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC5 ,739 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC4 ,727 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
235
JC ITAJ USM CR EA AV EV SV DV IV
JC3 ,743 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC2 ,731 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ1 ,000 ,776 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ5 ,000 ,735 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ4 ,000 ,778 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ3 ,000 ,816 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ2 ,000 ,829 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM4 ,000 ,000 ,921 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM3 ,000 ,000 ,903 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM2 ,000 ,000 ,886 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM1 ,000 ,000 ,798 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,825 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,738 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,779 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,735 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,783 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,843 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,808 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,667 ,000 ,000
SV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,738 ,000 ,000
SV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,768 ,000 ,000
SV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,841 ,000 ,000
SV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,809 ,000 ,000
DV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,762 ,000
DV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,859 ,000
DV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,844 ,000
DV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,764 ,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
236
JC ITAJ USM CR EA AV EV SV DV IV
IV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,755
IV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,831
IV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,812
IV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,828
Indirect Effects (Group number 1 - Default model)
JC ITAJ USM CR EA AV EV SV DV IV
AV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,162 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,082 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC6 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
237
JC ITAJ USM CR EA AV EV SV DV IV
USM3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,005 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,109 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,039 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,873 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,892 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,900 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,993 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,977 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,987 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,124 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,115 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,975 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,993 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,030 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,149 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,166 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Standardized Indirect Effects (Group number 1 - Default model)
JC ITAJ USM CR EA AV EV SV DV IV
AV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
238
JC ITAJ USM CR EA AV EV SV DV IV
EV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,748 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,644 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,683 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC6 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,666 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
239
JC ITAJ USM CR EA AV EV SV DV IV
EV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,717 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,687 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,532 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,589 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,612 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,671 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,645 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,639 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,720 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,708 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,641 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,640 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,704 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,688 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,701 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Model Fit Summary
CMIN
Model NPAR CMIN DF P CMIN/DF
Default model 129 1205,826 650 ,000 1,855
Saturated model 779 ,000 0
Independence model 38 6277,389 741 ,000 8,472
Baseline Comparisons
Model NFI
Delta1
RFI
rho1
IFI
Delta2
TLI
rho2 CFI
Default model ,808 ,781 ,901 ,886 ,900
Saturated model 1,000
1,000
1,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
240
Model NFI
Delta1
RFI
rho1
IFI
Delta2
TLI
rho2 CFI
Independence model ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Parsimony-Adjusted Measures
Model PRATIO PNFI PCFI
Default model ,877 ,709 ,789
Saturated model ,000 ,000 ,000
Independence model 1,000 ,000 ,000
NCP
Model NCP LO 90 HI 90
Default model 555,826 462,063 657,395
Saturated model ,000 ,000 ,000
Independence model 5536,389 5286,837 5792,484
FMIN
Model FMIN F0 LO 90 HI 90
Default model 6,090 2,807 2,334 3,320
Saturated model ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Independence model 31,704 27,962 26,701 29,255
RMSEA
Model RMSEA LO 90 HI 90 PCLOSE
Default model ,066 ,060 ,071 ,000
Independence model ,194 ,190 ,199 ,000
AIC
Model AIC BCC BIC CAIC
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
241
Model AIC BCC BIC CAIC
Default model 1463,826 1527,109
Saturated model 1558,000 1940,151
Independence model 6353,389 6372,031
ECVI
Model ECVI LO 90 HI 90 MECVI
Default model 7,393 6,920 7,906 7,713
Saturated model 7,869 7,869 7,869 9,799
Independence model 32,088 30,827 33,381 32,182
HOELTER
Model HOELTER
.05
HOELTER
.01
Default model 117 121
Independence model 26 27
Minimization: ,228
Miscellaneous: 4,994
Bootstrap: ,000
Total: 5,222
Data Maintest (Struktural)
Data Uji GOF dan Hipotesis
Computation of degrees of freedom (Default model)
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
242
Number of distinct sample moments: 779
Number of distinct parameters to be estimated: 123
Degrees of freedom (779 - 123): 656
Result (Default model)
Minimum was achieved
Chi-square = 1473,297
Degrees of freedom = 656
Probability level = ,000
Estimates (Group number 1 - Default model)
Scalar Estimates (Group number 1 - Default model)
Maximum Likelihood Estimates
Regression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model)
Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label
CR <--- EA ,672 ,090 7,487 ***
CR <--- USM ,205 ,038 5,364 ***
IV <--- EA 1,045 ,108 9,707 ***
DV <--- EA ,891 ,097 9,201 ***
SV <--- EA ,872 ,096 9,057 ***
EV <--- EA ,947 ,099 9,597 ***
ITAJ <--- JC ,494 ,068 7,271 ***
ITAJ <--- CR ,712 ,091 7,840 ***
AV <--- EA 1,000
IV4 <--- IV 1,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
243
Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label
IV3 <--- IV ,987 ,075 13,202 ***
IV2 <--- IV ,872 ,065 13,377 ***
IV1 <--- IV ,851 ,071 11,906 ***
DV4 <--- DV 1,000
DV3 <--- DV 1,135 ,090 12,556 ***
DV2 <--- DV 1,135 ,089 12,700 ***
DV1 <--- DV ,995 ,090 11,030 ***
SV4 <--- SV 1,000
SV3 <--- SV 1,019 ,078 13,042 ***
SV2 <--- SV ,933 ,079 11,752 ***
EV3 <--- EV 1,000
EV2 <--- EV 1,067 ,084 12,759 ***
EV1 <--- EV ,976 ,082 11,832 ***
AV3 <--- AV 1,000
AV2 <--- AV ,935 ,074 12,662 ***
AV1 <--- AV ,867 ,073 11,800 ***
USM1 <--- USM 1,000
USM2 <--- USM ,958 ,066 14,546 ***
USM3 <--- USM ,991 ,066 15,026 ***
USM4 <--- USM 1,020 ,066 15,486 ***
CR1 <--- CR 1,000
CR2 <--- CR 1,008 ,110 9,198 ***
CR4 <--- CR 1,340 ,136 9,865 ***
ITAJ1 <--- ITAJ 1,000
ITAJ2 <--- ITAJ 1,123 ,116 9,703 ***
ITAJ3 <--- ITAJ 1,055 ,112 9,462 ***
ITAJ4 <--- ITAJ ,948 ,105 9,012 ***
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
244
Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label
JC2 <--- JC ,931 ,090 10,318 ***
JC3 <--- JC ,954 ,091 10,439 ***
JC4 <--- JC ,980 ,096 10,258 ***
ITAJ5 <--- ITAJ ,837 ,099 8,416 ***
JC5 <--- JC ,917 ,089 10,359 ***
SV5 <--- SV ,897 ,092 9,777 ***
SV1 <--- SV ,924 ,083 11,179 ***
JC1 <--- JC 1,000
JC6 <--- JC 1,008 ,090 11,236 ***
CR3 <--- CR 1,213 ,138 8,772 ***
Standardized Regression Weights: (Group number 1 - Default model)
Estimate
CR <--- EA ,684
CR <--- USM ,358
IV <--- EA ,846
DV <--- EA ,848
SV <--- EA ,800
EV <--- EA ,869
ITAJ <--- JC ,528
ITAJ <--- CR ,729
AV <--- EA ,831
IV4 <--- IV ,831
IV3 <--- IV ,816
IV2 <--- IV ,824
IV1 <--- IV ,757
DV4 <--- DV ,773
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
245
Estimate
DV3 <--- DV ,846
DV2 <--- DV ,854
DV1 <--- DV ,757
SV4 <--- SV ,805
SV3 <--- SV ,839
SV2 <--- SV ,773
EV3 <--- EV ,806
EV2 <--- EV ,841
EV1 <--- EV ,787
AV3 <--- AV ,866
AV2 <--- AV ,794
AV1 <--- AV ,752
USM1 <--- USM ,797
USM2 <--- USM ,883
USM3 <--- USM ,903
USM4 <--- USM ,924
CR1 <--- CR ,693
CR2 <--- CR ,731
CR4 <--- CR ,792
ITAJ1 <--- ITAJ ,702
ITAJ2 <--- ITAJ ,758
ITAJ3 <--- ITAJ ,738
ITAJ4 <--- ITAJ ,700
JC2 <--- JC ,738
JC3 <--- JC ,746
JC4 <--- JC ,734
ITAJ5 <--- ITAJ ,651
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
246
Estimate
JC5 <--- JC ,741
SV5 <--- SV ,666
SV1 <--- SV ,742
JC1 <--- JC ,754
JC6 <--- JC ,799
CR3 <--- CR ,693
Intercepts: (Group number 1 - Default model)
Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label
IV4
5,482 ,072 76,251 ***
IV3
5,487 ,072 75,944 ***
IV2
5,508 ,063 87,046 ***
IV1
5,487 ,067 81,708 ***
DV4
5,693 ,066 86,602 ***
DV3
5,618 ,068 82,443 ***
DV2
5,538 ,067 82,053 ***
DV1
5,673 ,067 84,943 ***
SV4
5,824 ,065 88,971 ***
SV3
5,819 ,064 90,896 ***
SV2
5,796 ,064 91,049 ***
SV1
5,804 ,066 88,529 ***
EV3
5,739 ,065 87,778 ***
EV2
5,588 ,067 83,559 ***
EV1
5,593 ,065 85,646 ***
AV3
5,673 ,067 84,464 ***
AV2
5,653 ,069 82,487 ***
AV1
5,648 ,067 84,183 ***
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
247
Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label
SV5
5,573 ,071 78,478 ***
USM1
5,256 ,104 50,437 ***
USM2
5,241 ,090 58,120 ***
USM3
5,211 ,091 57,190 ***
USM4
5,296 ,092 57,743 ***
CR1
5,784 ,068 84,462 ***
CR2
5,693 ,065 86,926 ***
CR3
5,382 ,083 64,757 ***
CR4
5,457 ,080 67,996 ***
ITAJ1
5,724 ,066 86,585 ***
ITAJ2
5,447 ,069 79,261 ***
ITAJ3
5,558 ,066 83,726 ***
ITAJ4
5,719 ,063 90,939 ***
JC1
5,754 ,066 87,357 ***
JC2
5,719 ,063 91,400 ***
JC3
5,688 ,063 89,637 ***
JC4
5,774 ,066 87,181 ***
ITAJ5
5,739 ,060 96,184 ***
JC5
5,774 ,061 93,948 ***
JC6
5,794 ,063 92,512 ***
Variances: (Group number 1 - Default model)
Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label
USM
1,367 ,205 6,654 ***
JC
,488 ,081 5,994 ***
EA
,463 ,081 5,703 ***
e45
,180 ,039 4,587 ***
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
248
Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label
e39
,201 ,041 4,881 ***
e40
,143 ,031 4,636 ***
e41
,198 ,038 5,261 ***
e42
,135 ,032 4,158 ***
e43
,208 ,043 4,838 ***
e44
,081 ,025 3,235 ,001
e1
,317 ,042 7,505 ***
e2
,346 ,044 7,769 ***
e3
,255 ,033 7,637 ***
e4
,382 ,045 8,494 ***
e5
,345 ,041 8,400 ***
e6
,262 ,036 7,286 ***
e7
,243 ,034 7,083 ***
e8
,378 ,044 8,552 ***
e9
,299 ,038 7,867 ***
e10
,240 ,033 7,256 ***
e11
,322 ,039 8,254 ***
e12
,382 ,045 8,571 ***
e13
,296 ,040 7,488 ***
e14
,259 ,038 6,728 ***
e15
,321 ,041 7,796 ***
e16
,223 ,039 5,761 ***
e17
,344 ,046 7,556 ***
e19
,556 ,061 9,062 ***
e20
,783 ,089 8,817 ***
e21
,356 ,047 7,587 ***
e22
,303 ,044 6,932 ***
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
249
Estimate S.E. C.R. P Label
e23
,243 ,040 6,011 ***
e24
,482 ,056 8,639 ***
e25
,396 ,048 8,322 ***
e26
,711 ,082 8,640 ***
e27
,475 ,063 7,540 ***
e28
,439 ,051 8,646 ***
e29
,397 ,049 8,120 ***
e30
,398 ,048 8,341 ***
e31
,399 ,046 8,662 ***
e32
,371 ,044 8,394 ***
e33
,353 ,041 8,534 ***
e34
,353 ,042 8,463 ***
e35
,400 ,047 8,567 ***
e36
,406 ,045 8,968 ***
e37
,337 ,040 8,510 ***
e38
,281 ,036 7,855 ***
e18
,388 ,048 8,153 ***
Matrices (Group number 1 - Default model)
Total Effects (Group number 1 - Default model)
JC
US
M EA CR
ITA
J AV EV SV DV IV
CR ,000 ,205 ,672 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ ,494 ,146 ,479 ,712 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV ,000 ,000 1,00 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
250
JC
US
M EA CR
ITA
J AV EV SV DV IV
0
EV ,000 ,000 ,947 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV ,000 ,000 ,872 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV ,000 ,000 ,891 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV ,000 ,000 1,04
5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC6 1,00
8 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC5 ,917 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ
5 ,413 ,122 ,401 ,596 ,837 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC4 ,980 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC3 ,954 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC2 ,931 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC1 1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ
4 ,469 ,138 ,454 ,676 ,948 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ
3 ,521 ,154 ,505 ,752
1,05
5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ
2 ,555 ,164 ,538 ,800
1,12
3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ
1 ,494 ,146 ,479 ,712
1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR4 ,000 ,274 ,900 1,34
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR3 ,000 ,248 ,815 1,21
3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR2 ,000 ,206 ,677 1,00
8 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR1 ,000 ,205 ,672 1,00 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
251
JC
US
M EA CR
ITA
J AV EV SV DV IV
0
USM
4 ,000
1,02
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM
3 ,000 ,991 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM
2 ,000 ,958 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM
1 ,000
1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV5 ,000 ,000 ,782 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,897 ,000 ,000
AV1 ,000 ,000 ,867 ,000 ,000 ,867 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV2 ,000 ,000 ,935 ,000 ,000 ,935 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV3 ,000 ,000 1,00
0 ,000 ,000
1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV1 ,000 ,000 ,925 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,976 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV2 ,000 ,000 1,01
1 ,000 ,000 ,000
1,06
7 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV3 ,000 ,000 ,947 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV1 ,000 ,000 ,805 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,924 ,000 ,000
SV2 ,000 ,000 ,813 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,933 ,000 ,000
SV3 ,000 ,000 ,889 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,01
9 ,000 ,000
SV4 ,000 ,000 ,872 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,00
0 ,000 ,000
DV1 ,000 ,000 ,887 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,995 ,000
DV2 ,000 ,000 1,01
2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
1,13
5 ,000
DV3 ,000 ,000 1,01
1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
1,13
5 ,000
DV4 ,000 ,000 ,891 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,00 ,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
252
JC
US
M EA CR
ITA
J AV EV SV DV IV
0
IV1 ,000 ,000 ,889 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,851
IV2 ,000 ,000 ,912 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,872
IV3 ,000 ,000 1,03
1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,987
IV4 ,000 ,000 1,04
5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
1,00
0
Standardized Total Effects (Group number 1 - Default model)
JC USM EA CR ITAJ AV EV SV DV IV
CR ,000 ,358 ,684 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ ,528 ,261 ,499 ,729 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV ,000 ,000 ,831 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV ,000 ,000 ,869 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV ,000 ,000 ,800 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV ,000 ,000 ,848 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV ,000 ,000 ,846 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC6 ,799 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC5 ,741 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ5 ,344 ,170 ,324 ,474 ,651 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC4 ,734 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC3 ,746 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC2 ,738 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC1 ,754 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ4 ,370 ,183 ,349 ,510 ,700 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ3 ,390 ,193 ,368 ,538 ,738 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ2 ,401 ,198 ,378 ,553 ,758 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
253
JC USM EA CR ITAJ AV EV SV DV IV
ITAJ1 ,371 ,183 ,350 ,512 ,702 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR4 ,000 ,284 ,542 ,792 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR3 ,000 ,248 ,474 ,693 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR2 ,000 ,262 ,500 ,731 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR1 ,000 ,248 ,474 ,693 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM4 ,000 ,924 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM3 ,000 ,903 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM2 ,000 ,883 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM1 ,000 ,797 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV5 ,000 ,000 ,532 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,666 ,000 ,000
AV1 ,000 ,000 ,624 ,000 ,000 ,752 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV2 ,000 ,000 ,659 ,000 ,000 ,794 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV3 ,000 ,000 ,720 ,000 ,000 ,866 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV1 ,000 ,000 ,684 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,787 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV2 ,000 ,000 ,731 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,841 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV3 ,000 ,000 ,700 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,806 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV1 ,000 ,000 ,593 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,742 ,000 ,000
SV2 ,000 ,000 ,618 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,773 ,000 ,000
SV3 ,000 ,000 ,671 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,839 ,000 ,000
SV4 ,000 ,000 ,644 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,805 ,000 ,000
DV1 ,000 ,000 ,642 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,757 ,000
DV2 ,000 ,000 ,725 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,854 ,000
DV3 ,000 ,000 ,717 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,846 ,000
DV4 ,000 ,000 ,655 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,773 ,000
IV1 ,000 ,000 ,640 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,757
IV2 ,000 ,000 ,697 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,824
IV3 ,000 ,000 ,690 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,816
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
254
JC USM EA CR ITAJ AV EV SV DV IV
IV4 ,000 ,000 ,703 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,831
Direct Effects (Group number 1 - Default model)
JC
US
M EA CR
ITA
J AV EV SV DV IV
CR ,000 ,205 ,672 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ ,494 ,000 ,000 ,712 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV ,000 ,000 1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV ,000 ,000 ,947 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV ,000 ,000 ,872 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV ,000 ,000 ,891 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV ,000 ,000 1,04
5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC6 1,00
8 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC5 ,917 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ
5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,837 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC4 ,980 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC3 ,954 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC2 ,931 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC1 1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ
4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,948 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ
3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
1,05
5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ
2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
1,12
3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
255
JC
US
M EA CR
ITA
J AV EV SV DV IV
ITAJ
1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR4 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,34
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR3 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,21
3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR2 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,00
8 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR1 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM
4 ,000
1,02
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM
3 ,000 ,991 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM
2 ,000 ,958 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM
1 ,000
1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,897 ,000 ,000
AV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,867 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,935 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,976 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,06
7 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,00
0 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,924 ,000 ,000
SV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,933 ,000 ,000
SV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,01 ,000 ,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
256
JC
US
M EA CR
ITA
J AV EV SV DV IV
9
SV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,00
0 ,000 ,000
DV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,995 ,000
DV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,13
5 ,000
DV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,13
5 ,000
DV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,00
0 ,000
IV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,851
IV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,872
IV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,987
IV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 1,00
0
Standardized Direct Effects (Group number 1 - Default model)
JC USM EA CR ITAJ AV EV SV DV IV
CR ,000 ,358 ,684 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ ,528 ,000 ,000 ,729 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV ,000 ,000 ,831 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV ,000 ,000 ,869 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV ,000 ,000 ,800 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV ,000 ,000 ,848 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV ,000 ,000 ,846 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC6 ,799 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC5 ,741 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,651 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
257
JC USM EA CR ITAJ AV EV SV DV IV
JC4 ,734 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC3 ,746 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC2 ,738 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC1 ,754 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,700 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,738 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,758 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,702 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,792 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,693 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,731 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,693 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM4 ,000 ,924 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM3 ,000 ,903 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM2 ,000 ,883 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM1 ,000 ,797 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,666 ,000 ,000
AV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,752 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,794 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,866 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,787 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,841 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,806 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,742 ,000 ,000
SV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,773 ,000 ,000
SV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,839 ,000 ,000
SV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,805 ,000 ,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
258
JC USM EA CR ITAJ AV EV SV DV IV
DV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,757 ,000
DV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,854 ,000
DV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,846 ,000
DV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,773 ,000
IV1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,757
IV2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,824
IV3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,816
IV4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,831
Indirect Effects (Group number 1 - Default model)
JC USM EA CR ITAJ AV EV SV DV IV
CR ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ ,000 ,146 ,479 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC6 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ5 ,413 ,122 ,401 ,596 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ4 ,469 ,138 ,454 ,676 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ3 ,521 ,154 ,505 ,752 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
259
JC USM EA CR ITAJ AV EV SV DV IV
ITAJ2 ,555 ,164 ,538 ,800 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ1 ,494 ,146 ,479 ,712 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR4 ,000 ,274 ,900 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR3 ,000 ,248 ,815 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR2 ,000 ,206 ,677 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR1 ,000 ,205 ,672 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV5 ,000 ,000 ,782 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV1 ,000 ,000 ,867 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV2 ,000 ,000 ,935 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV3 ,000 ,000 1,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV1 ,000 ,000 ,925 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV2 ,000 ,000 1,011 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV3 ,000 ,000 ,947 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV1 ,000 ,000 ,805 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV2 ,000 ,000 ,813 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV3 ,000 ,000 ,889 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV4 ,000 ,000 ,872 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV1 ,000 ,000 ,887 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV2 ,000 ,000 1,012 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV3 ,000 ,000 1,011 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV4 ,000 ,000 ,891 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV1 ,000 ,000 ,889 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV2 ,000 ,000 ,912 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
260
JC USM EA CR ITAJ AV EV SV DV IV
IV3 ,000 ,000 1,031 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV4 ,000 ,000 1,045 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Standardized Indirect Effects (Group number 1 - Default model)
JC USM EA CR ITAJ AV EV SV DV IV
CR ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ ,000 ,261 ,499 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC6 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC5 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ5 ,344 ,170 ,324 ,474 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
JC1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ4 ,370 ,183 ,349 ,510 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ3 ,390 ,193 ,368 ,538 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ2 ,401 ,198 ,378 ,553 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
ITAJ1 ,371 ,183 ,350 ,512 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR4 ,000 ,284 ,542 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR3 ,000 ,248 ,474 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR2 ,000 ,262 ,500 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
CR1 ,000 ,248 ,474 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
261
JC USM EA CR ITAJ AV EV SV DV IV
USM4 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM3 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM2 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
USM1 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV5 ,000 ,000 ,532 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV1 ,000 ,000 ,624 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV2 ,000 ,000 ,659 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
AV3 ,000 ,000 ,720 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV1 ,000 ,000 ,684 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV2 ,000 ,000 ,731 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
EV3 ,000 ,000 ,700 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV1 ,000 ,000 ,593 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV2 ,000 ,000 ,618 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV3 ,000 ,000 ,671 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
SV4 ,000 ,000 ,644 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV1 ,000 ,000 ,642 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV2 ,000 ,000 ,725 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV3 ,000 ,000 ,717 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
DV4 ,000 ,000 ,655 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV1 ,000 ,000 ,640 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV2 ,000 ,000 ,697 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV3 ,000 ,000 ,690 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
IV4 ,000 ,000 ,703 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Minimization History (Default model)
Iter
atio
n
Negative
eigenvalues
Condition
#
Smallest
eigenvalue Diameter F NTries
Ra
tio
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
262
Iter
atio
n
Negative
eigenvalues
Condition
#
Smallest
eigenvalue Diameter F NTries
Ra
tio
0 e 19
-,828 9999,000 6231,854 0
99
99,
00
0
1 e 22
-,325 5,268 3682,421 20 ,31
6
2 e
* 8
-,258 1,881 2408,866 5
,88
7
3 e
* 1
-,053 1,907 1841,162 5
,61
3
4 e 0 1784,929
,931 1561,607 5 ,90
8
5 e 0 785,104
,611 1501,849 2 ,00
0
6 e 0 871,603
,329 1474,637 1 1,1
09
7 e 0 892,296
,110 1473,310 1 1,0
55
8 e 0 899,012
,013 1473,297 1 1,0
10
Model Fit Summary
CMIN
Model NPAR CMIN DF P CMIN/DF
Default model 123 1473,297 656 ,000 2,246
Saturated model 779 ,000 0
Independence model 38 6277,389 741 ,000 8,472
Baseline Comparisons
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
263
Model NFI
Delta1
RFI
rho1
IFI
Delta2
TLI
rho2 CFI
Default model ,765 ,735 ,855 ,833 ,852
Saturated model 1,000
1,000
1,000
Independence model ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Parsimony-Adjusted Measures
Model PRATIO PNFI PCFI
Default model ,885 ,678 ,755
Saturated model ,000 ,000 ,000
Independence model 1,000 ,000 ,000
NCP
Model NCP LO 90 HI 90
Default model 817,297 709,788 932,515
Saturated model ,000 ,000 ,000
Independence model 5536,389 5286,837 5792,484
FMIN
Model FMIN F0 LO 90 HI 90
Default model 7,441 4,128 3,585 4,710
Saturated model ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000
Independence model 31,704 27,962 26,701 29,255
RMSEA
Model RMSEA LO 90 HI 90 PCLOSE
Default model ,079 ,074 ,085 ,000
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
264
Model RMSEA LO 90 HI 90 PCLOSE
Independence model ,194 ,190 ,199 ,000
AIC
Model AIC BCC BIC CAIC
Default model 1719,297 1779,637
Saturated model 1558,000 1940,151
Independence model 6353,389 6372,031
ECVI
Model ECVI LO 90 HI 90 MECVI
Default model 8,683 8,140 9,265 8,988
Saturated model 7,869 7,869 7,869 9,799
Independence model 32,088 30,827 33,381 32,182
HOELTER
Model HOELTER
.05
HOELTER
.01
Default model 97 100
Independence model 26 27
Minimization: ,286
Miscellaneous: 6,955
Bootstrap: ,000
Total: 7,241
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018
265
Analisis Of Employer..., Lita Mutiasari, FB UMN, 2018