1
Ted Lewis ([email protected]); Raymond. S. Bradley; Pierre Francus University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Climate System Research Center LACUSTRINE SEDIMENTARY PROCESSES NEAR A HIGH ARCTIC DELTA, LAKE TUBORG, ELLESMERE ISLAND ACKNOWLEDGMENTS See http://www.geo.umass.edu/gradstud/lewist/lewist.htm and http://www.paleoclimate.org for more details. ABOVE: The major watersheds of Lake Tuborg (~81 o N 75 o W). The southwest basin is meromictic (about 155 m deep); the northeast basin is entirely freshwater (about 80 m deep). Watershed A is nivally fed, B is mostly nivally fed, C and D are mostly glacially fed. Inset shows location of Lake Tuborg on Ellesmere Island. ABOVE: (A) 1959 aerial photograph of Lake Tuborg highlighting Delta A. (B) Bathymetric map of the study area near Delta A. Black symbols are points where bathymetry was measured. Red symbols are CTD cast sites. The red grid illustrates the sampling area. White labels are depth (m) below lake level. Lake Tuborg 500 1000 1500 2500 3000 2500 3500 4500 2500 2000 1500 2500 3000 + + 480000 E 8990000 N 500000 E 8970000 N + 500000 E 9010000 N Agassiz Ice Cap D C A B Alert L. Tuborg Eureka Grise Fd. 0 100 200 Scale (Km) SCALE (Km) 0 5 10 489400 489500 489600 489700 489800 489900 490000 8989600 8989700 8989800 8989900 8990000 8990100 8990200 T4-A T4-A T4-B T4-B T4-C T4-C T4-D T4-D T4-E T4-E T4-F T4-F T4-G T4-G T4-H T4-H T4-I T4-I T4-J T4-J T4-K T4-K T4-L T4-L T4-M T4-M T4-N T4-N T4-O T4-O T4-P T4-P RAIN30 70 73 74 75 76 77 79 80 81 82 83 85 86 87 88 89 92 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 107 108 109 110 111 112 130 -105 -100 -90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 UTM NORTHING UTM EASTING B A The images below were produced in an open source software package called OpenDX. Data were collected with a Sea Bird Instruments SBE19 CTD (Conductivity Temperature/Transmissivity Depth) profiler with a 660 nm, 25 cm path length SeaTech transmissometer. OpenDX (http://www.opendx.org) is a visualization and analysis application. OpenDX provides tools for manipulating, transforming, processing, realizing, rendering and animating data and allows for visualization and analysis methods. OpenDX was developed by the Deep Computing Institute at IBM, and was released as open source on May 24, 1999. It runs on UNIX-based machines, but has been ported to Windows 95/NT. Most importantly for this project, interpolated data can be exported and analyzed. It is hoped that the SeaTech transmissometer can be calibrated to suspended sediment concentration. The mass of sediment within each water volume could then be calculated. Table 1: CTD AND TRANSMISSOMETER SPECIFICATIONS Temperature Conductivity Pressure Transmissivity Range -5 to +35 o C 0-7 S/m 50 to 10,000 psia 0-5 V (~0.004-20 mg/L) Accuracy 0.01 o C /6 months 0.001 S/m/month 0.5% of full scale ? Resolution 0.001 o C 0.0001 S/m 0.03% of full scale 0.001 V R Cast Locations, 105 m apart Overflow plumes (attenuation increases) adjacent to tributary inputs. Conductivity (us/cm). Sharp and strong chemocline at approximately 55 m. ATTENUATION ON JUNE 16, 2001 CONDUCTIVITY ON JUNE 19, 2001 A B C At left: Colorbars for OpenDX images. A represents temperature (*C), B represents conductivity (us/cm) C represents attenuation (%, 100-transmissivity). 6/17 6/21 6/19 6/23 6/25 6/27 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 ATTENUATION (%) DATE An NSF grant to R. Bradley and a GSA award to T. Lewis supported research. The Polar Continental Shelf Project provided field logistics. Joe Rogers and Chloe Stuart provided field assistance. Dr. Chris Duncan, Frank Keimig, and Celeste Asikainen. A B C D At left: (A) Attenuation on June 16, 2001. Note the large attenuation increase at the chemocline (~55 m). This attenuation spike is seen throughout the meromictic basin even before the onset of summer snowmelt. This could be a result of algal mats, sediment of insufficient density to pass into the monimolimnion, or precipitation from the dissolved load when anoxic water (in the monimolimnion) comes in contact with oxic water (in the mixolimnion). (B) Attenuation on June 28. The attenuation spike is thicker, less well defined, and has shallowed somewhat. Meltwater may have caused some mixing, and suspended sediment may have “ramped” on the density difference at the chemocline. (C) Water temperature on June 19. Note the relatively warm water of the monimolimnion and mixing near the delta face. (D) Attenuation on June 19. Turbid water near the delta face. 6/16 6/23 6/19 6/28 At left: (E) Attenuation on June 19. (F) Water temperature on June 19. The overflow plume is composed of water slightly warmer than its surroundings. At right: Top: Each 3-D visualization is composed of volumetric pixels (voxels). Each voxel has an interpolated value. Histograms of attenuation for each date were produced. Bottom: A surface plot combining the four histograms (cf. Beierle et al., 2002). Each voxel has a known volume, and field calibration of the transmissometer to suspended sediment concentration should be possible. Therefore, the mass of sediment within each visualization (or a portion of each visualization) could be calculated INTRODUCTION: Lake Tuborg is a large glacially fed and glacially dammed lake on west-central Ellesmere Island. It has two sub-basins. The southwest sub-basin is meromictic, and has a maximum depth of 155 m. The northeast sub-basin is freshwater and is shallower (Zmax, ~80 m). This poster shows processes of sedimentation recorded near a large nival delta (watershed A at left, photo at right) located at the north-central portion of the lake. Processes were recorded during peak nival melt in 2001 with sediment traps, a datalogging flow meter, and a CTD. Annual suspended sediment discharge from this nival delta is likely much less than glacially-fed deltas at Lake Tuborg. However, the nival tributary flows into the lake in its meromictic basin, and the delta face is steep. Therefore, this is an ideal location to study how sedimentary processes are affected by meromixis. 19-May 2-Jun 16-Jun 30-Jun 14-Jul 28-Jul 11-Aug 25-Aug 30 20 10 0 19-May 2-Jun 16-Jun 30-Jun 14-Jul 28-Jul 11-Aug 25-Aug -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 0 4 8 12 0 4 8 12 19-May 2-Jun 16-Jun 30-Jun 14-Jul 28-Jul 11-Aug 25-Aug 0 .40 .80 1.20 0 .40 .80 1.20 Number of Days Average ‘47-’01 Precip (mm) Temperature (*C) Precipitation (mm) Lake Level (m) A B C 19-May 2-Jun 16-Jun 30-Jun 14-Jul 28-Jul 11-Aug 25-Aug -20 -10 0 10 -20 -10 0 10 2001 Regional Near Surface Temperatures Resolute Eureka Lake Tuborg (~10 m ASL) Air Temperature (2001) (10 m ASL) (67 m ASL) D Above: Weather and climate at Lake Tuborg and regional weather stations. (A) Precipitation at Eureka, 1948-2001. Lower graph (black) shows mean precipitation for each day. Upper graph (red) shows the number of days used for to calculate mean precipitation. (B) Red line graph shows mean daily 2001 air temperature recorded at lake level with a datalogging thermistor. Temperature was recorded with a 15-minute interval. Black line graph shows 1947- 2001 air temperatures recorded at Eureka. Black bar chart shows 2001 Lake Tuborg precipitaton (mm). (C) Lake level fluctuations at Lake Tuborg in 2001. Zero datum is the lowest recorded lake level. (D) Air temperatures recorded at Lake Tuborg, Eureka and Resolute in 2001. R-squared for Resolute and Tuborg is 0.57; R-squared for Eureka and Tuborg is 0.90. Mean daily temperature (5/21-8/11) for: Lake Tuborg , 2.9 *C Resolute, 2.9 *C 0 200 400 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 Meters Below Surface Meters From Shore T4-H T4-E T4-F T4-G Mixolimnion Monimolimnion -85 m 55 m -79 m -67 m 6/22 12:00 6/23 00:00 6/23 12:00 6/24 00:00 6/24 12:00 6/25 00:00 6/25 12:00 DATE AND TIME B 0 40 80 120 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 Flow Velocity (m/s) IRPM Y=0.002679*X+0.0301 2 r =0.99 A C At left: Current meter results from Site G. Currents were recorded when the meter was hung at the chemocline (55 m). Repeated deployments were made below the chemocline, even during times of peak nival melt. (A) Calibration curve (B) Lake Tuborg Currents (C) Current meter courtesy of Roger Lewis and John Sweeney. Based on CTD profiles, the difference in concentration between freshwater and saltwater based on salinity and temperature is about 20 g/L. During the 1995 slush flow at Delta D, SSC reached 5 g/L (Braun, 1997), while SSC reached 2 g/L during the 2001 nival flood at Delta A. This theoretically precludes the occurrence of fluvially generated underflows in the meromictic sub-basin of Lake Tuborg, even during extreme events. 0 50 100 150 200 250 Particle Diameter (um) 0 2 4 6 Frequency (%) 531 0 50 100 150 200 250 Particle Diameter (um) 0 2 4 6 Frequency (%) 410 0 50 100 150 200 250 Particle Diameter (um) 0 2 4 6 Frequency (%) 589 0 50 100 150 200 250 Particle Diameter (um) 0 2 4 6 Frequency (%) 640 0 50 100 150 200 250 Particle Diameter (um) 0 2 4 6 Frequency (%) 1032 0 50 100 150 200 250 Particle Diameter (um) 0 2 4 6 Frequency (%) 1036 LEGEND: Numbers in red boxes represent mass accumulation rate, and are size- scaled. Black histograms are Results from delta-proximal sediment traps deployed from June 20-30, the period of peak nival melt. Sediment traps were deployed to determine the effect of the monimolimnion on sedimentation. One trap on each mooring was placed at the top of the chemocline, and one was 1.5 m above the lake bottom. Mass accumulation rate (MAR) units are g/m2/d. Grain size data are averages of 3-runs per sample. Each trap was “double barreled”, and grain size and MAR results are averages of the two barrels. MAR and grain size mode decreased with distance from shore. Interestingly, MAR for upper and lower traps on the same mooring are similar. This implies that little additional sediment is added in the monimolimnion. These results agree with CTD casts and current recordings, which imply that stratified flows (interflows and overflows) are confined to the mixolimnion. Gravity cores were obtained with a Glew corer. Core T4G is mostly massive sand. Two silt clasts are present in the upper 12 cm. These are likely slump blocks, transported from the steep delta slope. Sandy laminae between 13-18 cm could record daily sediment pulses. Core T4E consists mostly of sand laminae separated by silt and clay laminae, except for a massive silty section from 12-18 cm. Joe Rogers Brrrrrrrr! Rain Gauges Radiation Shield SeaCat SBE19 E F

LACUSTRINE SEDIMENTARY PROCESSES NEAR A HIGH …2001 Lake Tuborg precipitaton (mm). (C) Lake level fluctuations at Lake Tuborg in 2001. Zero datum is the lowest recorded lake level

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    10

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Ted Lewis ([email protected]); Raymond. S. Bradley; Pierre Francus University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Climate System Research Center

    LACUSTRINE SEDIMENTARY PROCESSES NEAR A HIGH ARCTIC DELTA, LAKE TUBORG, ELLESMERE ISLAND

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    See http://www.geo.umass.edu/gradstud/lewist/lewist.htmand http://www.paleoclimate.org for more details.

    ABOVE: The major watersheds of Lake Tuborg (~81oN 75oW). The southwest basin is meromictic (about 155 m deep); the northeast basin is entirely freshwater (about 80 m deep). Watershed A is nivally fed, B is mostly nivally fed, C and D are mostly glacially fed. Inset shows location of Lake Tuborg on Ellesmere Island.

    ABOVE: (A) 1959 aerial photograph of Lake Tuborg highlighting Delta A. (B) Bathymetric map of the study area near Delta A. Black symbols are points where bathymetry was measured. Red symbols are CTD cast sites. The red grid illustrates the sampling area. White labels are depth (m) below lake level.

    Lake T

    uborg

    500

    1000

    1500

    2500

    3000

    2500

    3500

    4500

    2500

    2000

    1500

    2500

    3000

    +

    +480000 E8990000 N

    500000 E8970000 N

    +500000 E9010000 N

    Agassiz Ice Cap

    D

    C

    A

    B

    Alert

    L. Tuborg

    Eureka

    Grise Fd.

    0 100 200

    Scale (Km)

    SCALE (Km)

    0 5 10

    489400 489500 489600 489700 489800 489900 490000

    8989600

    8989700

    8989800

    8989900

    8990000

    8990100

    8990200

    T4-A T4-A

    T4-B T4-B

    T4-C T4-C

    T4-D T4-D

    T4-E T4-E

    T4-F T4-F

    T4-G T4-G

    T4-H T4-H

    T4-I T4-I

    T4-J T4-J

    T4-K T4-K

    T4-L T4-L

    T4-M T4-M

    T4-N T4-N

    T4-O T4-O

    T4-P T4-P

    RAIN30

    7073

    74

    75767779

    80

    81

    82

    83

    85

    86

    87

    88

    89

    92

    95

    96

    97

    98

    99100

    101102

    103104

    105107108

    109

    110111

    112

    130

    -105

    -100

    -90

    -80

    -70

    -60

    -50

    -40

    -30

    -20

    -10

    0

    UT

    M N

    OR

    TH

    ING

    UTM EASTING

    B

    A

    The images below were produced in an open source software package called OpenDX. Data were collected with a Sea Bird Instruments SBE19 CTD (Conductivity Temperature/Transmissivity Depth) profiler with a 660 nm, 25 cm path length SeaTech transmissometer.

    OpenDX (http://www.opendx.org) is a visualization and analysis application. OpenDX provides tools for manipulating, transforming, processing, realizing, rendering and animating data and allows for visualization and analysis methods. OpenDX was developed by the Deep Computing Institute at IBM, and was released as open source on May 24, 1999. It runs on UNIX-based machines, but has been ported to Windows 95/NT.

    Most importantly for this project, interpolated data can be exported and analyzed. It is hoped that the SeaTech transmissometer can be calibrated to suspended sediment concentration. The mass of sediment within each water volume could then be calculated.

    Table 1: CTD AND TRANSMISSOMETER SPECIFICATIONS Temperature Conductivity Pressure Transmissivity Range -5 to +35 oC 0-7 S/m 50 to 10,000 psia 0-5 V (~0.004-20

    mg/L) Accuracy 0.01 oC /6 months 0.001 S/m/month 0.5% of full scale ? Resolution 0.001 oC 0.0001 S/m 0.03% of full scale 0.001 V

    R

    Cast Locations,105 m apart

    Overflow plumes (attenuation increases)adjacent to tributaryinputs.

    Conductivity (us/cm). Sharp and strong chemocline at approximately 55 m.

    ATTENUATION ON JUNE 16, 2001 CONDUCTIVITY ON JUNE 19, 2001

    A B C

    At left: Colorbars for OpenDX images.A represents temperature (*C),B represents conductivity (us/cm)C represents attenuation (%, 100-transmissivity).

    6/1

    7

    6/2

    1

    6/1

    9

    6/2

    3

    6/2

    5

    6/2

    7

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    AT

    TE

    NU

    AT

    ION

    (%

    )

    DATE

    An NSF grant to R. Bradley and a GSA award to T. Lewis supported research. The Polar Continental Shelf Project provided field logistics. Joe Rogers and Chloe Stuart provided field assistance. Dr. Chris Duncan, Frank Keimig, and Celeste Asikainen.

    A B

    C D

    At left: (A) Attenuation on June 16, 2001. Note the large attenuation increase at the chemocline (~55 m). This attenuation spike is seen throughout the meromictic basin even before the onset of summer snowmelt. This could be a result of algal mats, sediment of insufficient density to pass into the monimolimnion, or precipitation from the dissolved load when anoxic water (in the monimolimnion) comes in contact with oxic water (in the mixolimnion). (B) Attenuation on June 28. The attenuation spike is thicker, less well defined, and has shallowed somewhat. Meltwater may have caused some mixing, and suspended sediment may have “ramped” on the density difference at the chemocline. (C) Water temperature on June 19. Note the relatively warm water of the monimolimnion and mixing near the delta face. (D) Attenuation on June 19. Turbid water near the delta face.

    6/16 6/236/19 6/28At left: (E) Attenuation on June 19. (F) Water temperature on June 19. The overflow plume is composed of water slightly warmer than its surroundings.

    At right: Top: Each 3-D visualization is composed of volumetric pixels (voxels). Each voxel has an interpolated value. Histograms of attenuation for each date were produced. Bottom: A surface plot combining the four histograms (cf. Beierle et al., 2002). Each voxel has a known volume, and field calibration of the transmissometer to suspended sediment concentration should be possible. Therefore, the mass of sediment within each visualization (or a portion of each visualization) could be calculated

    INTRODUCTION: Lake Tuborg is a large glacially fed and glacially dammed lake on west-central Ellesmere Island. It has two sub-basins. The southwest sub-basin is meromictic, and has a maximum depth of 155 m. The northeast sub-basin is freshwater and is shallower (Zmax, ~80 m).

    This poster shows processes of sedimentation recorded near a large nival delta (watershed A at left, photo at right) located at the north-central portion of the lake. Processes were recorded during peak nival melt in 2001 with sediment traps, a datalogging flow meter, and a CTD.

    Annual suspended sediment discharge from this nival delta is likely much less than glacially-fed deltas at Lake Tuborg. However, the nival tributary flows into the lake in its meromictic basin, and the delta face is steep. Therefore, this is an ideal location to study how sedimentary processes are affected by meromixis.

    19-May 2-Jun 16-Jun 30-Jun 14-Jul 28-Jul 11-Aug 25-Aug

    30

    20

    10

    0

    19-May 2-Jun 16-Jun 30-Jun 14-Jul 28-Jul 11-Aug 25-Aug

    -15

    -10

    -5

    0

    5

    10

    0

    4

    8

    12

    0

    4

    8

    12

    19-May 2-Jun 16-Jun 30-Jun 14-Jul 28-Jul 11-Aug 25-Aug

    0

    .40

    .80

    1.20

    0

    .40

    .80

    1.20

    Nu

    mb

    er

    of D

    ays

    Ave

    rag

    e ‘4

    7-’0

    1 P

    reci

    p (

    mm

    )Te

    mp

    era

    ture

    (*C

    )

    Pre

    cip

    itatio

    n (

    mm

    )

    La

    ke L

    eve

    l (m

    )

    A

    B

    C

    19-May 2-Jun 16-Jun 30-Jun 14-Jul 28-Jul 11-Aug 25-Aug

    -20

    -10

    0

    10

    -20

    -10

    0

    10

    2001 Regional Near Surface Temperatures

    Resolute

    Eureka

    Lake Tuborg (~10 m ASL)

    Air T

    em

    pe

    ratu

    re (

    20

    01

    )

    (10 m ASL)

    (67 m ASL)

    D

    Above: Weather and climate at Lake Tuborg and regional weather stations. (A) Precipitation at Eureka, 1948-2001. Lower graph (black) shows mean precipitation for each day. Upper graph (red) shows the number of days used for to calculate mean precipitation.

    (B) Red line graph shows mean daily 2001 air temperature recorded at lake level with a datalogging thermistor. Temperature was recorded with a 15-minute interval. Black line graph shows 1947-2001 air temperatures recorded at Eureka. Black bar chart shows 2001 Lake Tuborg precipitaton (mm).

    (C) Lake level fluctuations at Lake Tuborg in 2001. Zero datum is the lowest recorded lake level.

    (D) Air temperatures recorded at Lake Tuborg, Eureka and Resolute in 2001. R-squared for Resolute and Tuborg is 0.57; R-squared for Eureka and Tuborg is 0.90.

    Mean daily temperature (5/21-8/11) for:Lake Tuborg , 2.9 *CResolute, 2.9 *C

    0 200 400

    -80

    -60

    -40

    -20

    0

    Me

    ters

    Be

    low

    Su

    rfac

    e

    Meters From Shore

    T4-H T4-ET4-FT4-G

    Mixolimnion

    Monimolimnion

    -85 m

    55 m

    -79 m

    -67 m

    6/2212:00

    6/2300:00

    6/2312:00

    6/2400:00

    6/2412:00

    6/2500:00

    6/2512:00

    DATE AND TIME

    B

    0 40 80120

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    Flo

    w V

    elo

    cit

    y (

    m/s

    )

    IRPM

    Y=0.002679*X+0.03012r =0.99

    A CAt left: Current meter results from Site G. Currents were recorded when the meter was hung at the chemocline (55 m). Repeated deployments were made below the chemocline, even during times of peak nival melt.

    (A) Calibration curve (B) Lake Tuborg Currents (C) Current meter courtesy of Roger Lewis and John Sweeney.

    Based on CTD profiles, the difference in concentration between freshwater and saltwater based on salinity and temperature is about 20 g/L. During the 1995 slush flow at Delta D, SSC reached 5 g/L (Braun, 1997), while SSC reached 2 g/L during the 2001 nival flood at Delta A. This theoretically precludes the occurrence of fluvially generated underflows in the meromictic sub-basin of Lake Tuborg, even during extreme events.

    0 50 100 150 200 250Particle Diameter (um)

    0

    2

    4

    6

    Fre

    quen

    cy(%

    )531

    0 50 100 150 200 250Particle Diameter (um)

    0

    2

    4

    6

    Fre

    quen

    cy(%

    )

    410

    0 50 100 150 200 250Particle Diameter (um)

    0

    2

    4

    6

    Fre

    quen

    cy(%

    )

    589

    0 50 100 150 200 250Particle Diameter (um)

    0

    2

    4

    6

    Fre

    quen

    cy(%

    )

    640

    0 50 100 150 200 250Particle Diameter (um)

    0

    2

    4

    6

    Fre

    quen

    cy(%

    )

    1032

    0 50 100 150 200 250Particle Diameter (um)

    0

    2

    4

    6

    Fre

    quen

    cy(%

    )

    1036

    LEGEND: Numbers in red boxes represent mass accumulation rate, and are size-scaled. Black histograms are

    Results from delta-proximal sediment traps deployed from June 20-30, the period of peak nival melt. Sediment traps were deployed to determine the effect of the monimolimnion on sedimentation. One trap on each mooring was placed at the top of the chemocline, and one was 1.5 m above the lake bottom. Mass accumulation rate (MAR) units are g/m2/d. Grain size data are averages of 3-runs per sample. Each trap was “double barreled”, and grain size and MAR results are averages of the two barrels. MAR and grain size mode decreased with distance from shore. Interestingly, MAR for upper and lower traps on the same mooring are similar. This implies that little additional sediment is added in the monimolimnion. These results agree with CTD casts and current recordings, which imply that stratified flows (interflows and overflows) are confined to the mixolimnion. Gravity cores were obtained with a Glew corer. Core T4G is mostly massive sand. Two silt clasts are present in the upper 12 cm. These are likely slump blocks, transported from the steep delta slope. Sandy laminae between 13-18 cm could record daily sediment pulses. Core T4E consists mostly of sand laminae separated by silt and clay laminae, except for a massive silty section from 12-18 cm.

    Jo

    e R

    og

    ers

    Brr

    rrrr

    rr!

    Rain Gauges Radiation Shield

    Se

    aC

    at S

    BE

    19

    E

    F

    Page 1