8
Subscribe Now: Get the Billionaires issue with your subscription Help | Connect | Sign up | Log in TAXES | 11/24/2012 @ 9:19AM | 387 views Labels Theresa Karam was denied innocent spouse status by the Tax Court and has lost on appeal to the Sixth Circuit. There is a very interesting twist to her case. Her failure to get innocent spouse status was cushioned by the lawsuit that she won against her accountant. He did not make it clear to his client that Follow(162) Peter J Reilly, Contributor I focus on the tax issues of individuals, businesses & more Follow 52 11 93 0 Comment Now Follow Comments New Posts +28 posts this hour Most Popular 29 Youngest Billionaires Lists The World's Billionaires Video Billionaire Newcomers Search companies, people an Page 1 of 8 Joint Returns Need Warning Labels - Forbes 3/5/2013 http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/2012/11/24/joint-returns-need-warning-labels/?goback=%2Egde_4816727_member_219604712

Labels - My CFOmycfo-mycpa.com/...JoinRetrnsNeedWarningLabels.pdf · Labels Theresa Karam was denied innocent spouse status by the Tax Court and has lost on appeal to the Sixth Circuit

  • Upload
    lenhan

  • View
    218

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Labels - My CFOmycfo-mycpa.com/...JoinRetrnsNeedWarningLabels.pdf · Labels Theresa Karam was denied innocent spouse status by the Tax Court and has lost on appeal to the Sixth Circuit

Subscribe Now: Get the Billionaires issue with your subscription Help|Connect|Sign up|Log in

TAXES | 11/24/2012 @ 9:19AM | 387 views

Labels

Theresa Karam was denied innocent

spouse status by the Tax Court and

has lost on appeal to the Sixth

Circuit. There is a very interesting

twist to her case. Her failure to get

innocent spouse status was

cushioned by the lawsuit that she

won against her accountant. He did

not make it clear to his client that

Follow(162)

Peter J Reilly, Contributor

I focus on the tax issues of individuals, businesses & more

Follow 52

11

93

0

Comment Now Follow Comments

New Posts

+28 posts this hour

Most Popular

29 Youngest Billionaires

Lists

The World's Billionaires

Video

Billionaire NewcomersSearch companies, people and lists

Page 1 of 8Joint Returns Need Warning Labels - Forbes

3/5/2013http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/2012/11/24/joint-returns-need-warning-labels/?goback=%2Egde_4816727_member_219604712

Page 2: Labels - My CFOmycfo-mycpa.com/...JoinRetrnsNeedWarningLabels.pdf · Labels Theresa Karam was denied innocent spouse status by the Tax Court and has lost on appeal to the Sixth Circuit

Most Read on Forbes

Follow On ForbesKeep up with the writers,

people, places, companies and

organizations that interest you.

Sign up now »

filing a joint return is an election. A

joint return will generally result in a

lower tax than the total of two

married filing separate returns, but

there is a significant downside. It is called joint and several liability. The IRS

can collect the entire tax from either of the spouses. There can be relief from

this harsh result but, as Theresa Karam learned, it is not easy to get that relief.

The story is a little odd:

The Karams have used an accountant to file joint

federal income tax returns since they were

married. However, in 1997, following the death of

their long-time accountant, James Karam retained

Theodore C. Schumann, P.C., C.P.A., doing

business as Dental Business Services, Inc. (the

“Schumann firm”), to take over the family’s

accounting and taxes. Although James provided

the Schumann firm with tax documentation

necessary to timely prepare their tax returns, the

firm was delinquent in preparing the Karam’s tax

returns for the years 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001.

The Karams later discovered that the accountant

assigned to their file was ill, and the firm never

had another accountant prepare their returns.

I don’t get how Dr. Karam went as long as he did

providing information to timely file his returns and

not think that there was some sort of problem when

they never got prepared. It took pressure from the

IRS to get him to look into it.

NEWS People Places Companies

Peter J Reilly

Contributor

Follow(162)

I am a CPA with over 30 years experience. I focus

on the tax issues of individuals, closely held

businesses, partnerships, limited liability

Joint Return for Divorcing Spouses - Think Thrice -Then Think Again

Peter J Reilly

Contributor

The World's Youngest Billionaires: 29

Under 40 +167,055 views

Inside The 2013 Billionaires List: Facts

and Figures +137,139 views

Prince Alwaleed And The Curious Case

Of Kingdom Holding Stock +92,499 views

The World's Richest Billionaires: Full

List Of The Top 500 +43,588 views

So Yes, The Apple vs Samsung Verdict

Was A Big Mistake +36,070 views

Page 2 of 8Joint Returns Need Warning Labels - Forbes

3/5/2013http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/2012/11/24/joint-returns-need-warning-labels/?goback=%2Egde_4816727_member_219604712

Page 3: Labels - My CFOmycfo-mycpa.com/...JoinRetrnsNeedWarningLabels.pdf · Labels Theresa Karam was denied innocent spouse status by the Tax Court and has lost on appeal to the Sixth Circuit

The author is a Forbes contributor. The opinions expressed

are those of the writer.

In August 2002, IRS Officer Sharon Sloan

demanded that the Karams file their delinquent

income tax returns or face a financial records

subpoena. Thereafter, the Schumann firm finally

delivered joint income tax returns for the Karams

to sign. Attached to each return was a note saying

“please sign.” Theresa Karam alleges that she had

to sign the returns as presented and was unaware

that she could decline to file a joint return and

instead file as “married filing separately.” The

Schumann firm never advised her with respect to

the tax consequences of filing a joint return. She

nevertheless signed each of the four returns, and

the Schumann firm filed them with the IRS.

I don’t want to knock the accountants for the

mistake that they seem to have made, because it is

close to a universal mistake. There are two very

distinct areas of tax practice. In one area you are

determining the correct tax and coming up with

legitimate ways to make the correct tax as low as

possible given whatever constraints you might be

working with. Call that compliance/planning. The

other area is collections. When practicing in the

collections area, lowering the correct tax will often

be only of academic interest. Collections is all about

what you can pay. Filing a joint return is almost

always the right answer in compliance/planning

mode. If the balance due is being paid, making it as

small as possible is clearly the way to go.

companies and sophisticated real estate

transactions. My blog entries are generally based on

original source material that is no more than two

months old. Peter J. Reilly is a Managing Director -

PETER J REILLY’S POPULAR POSTS

We Won't Get Ahead By Taxing Warren Buffett

More -- Jennifer Aniston, Maybe 76,092 views

The Real Reason Warren Buffett's Taxes Are Low

63,431 views

Zuckerberg Wedding - The Things You Have To Do

When You Are A Billionaire 28,260 views

Big Brother Gets Little Sister as Dependent

27,621 views

Occupy Wall Street - Finally A Tax Proposal Warren

Buffett Should Love 19,530 views

MORE FROM PETER J REILLY

Nebraska Supreme Court Rules - State Court Cannot Order Joint Federal Return

Peter J Reilly

Contributor

IRS Eases Up on Abuse Victims

Peter J Reilly

Contributor

Page 3 of 8Joint Returns Need Warning Labels - Forbes

3/5/2013http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/2012/11/24/joint-returns-need-warning-labels/?goback=%2Egde_4816727_member_219604712

Page 4: Labels - My CFOmycfo-mycpa.com/...JoinRetrnsNeedWarningLabels.pdf · Labels Theresa Karam was denied innocent spouse status by the Tax Court and has lost on appeal to the Sixth Circuit

Who Just Made a Billion Dollars?

Our Real-Time Billionaires scoreboard tracks

the biggest holdings for 50 of the world’s

wealthiest people.

See who's up & who's down right now »

If the balance due is not going to be paid, filing a

joint return is quite likely the wrong answer. Ms.

Karam was an employee and presumably had

withholdings. It seems unlikely that she would not

have had a huge balance due had she filed

separately. Doctor Karam would likely have owed

even more on a separate return. So what ? He

didn’t pay the lower balance due for the joint return

and by making it a joint return the IRS ended up with two people they could

chase for it.

In August 2006, Theresa Karam sued the Schumann firm in Michigan state

court, alleging that the firm’s negligence and breach of contract resulted in

her joint and several liability for federal income taxes. The case was

ultimately settled, with a payment of $150,000 to petitioner. After paying

attorney’s fees and costs, Karam offered the IRS the remaining balance of

$99,186 to settle her outstanding tax liability. Pursuant to administrative

procedure, Karam was required to deposit twenty percent of her offer with

the IRS, which she did. However, the IRS ultimately rejected Karam’s

settlement offer and kept her $19,837 deposit.

Ms. Karam was denied innocent spouse relief for a couple of reasons. The

Court did not believe that she was unaware that her husband was not going to

pay the balance due on the delinquent returns. There was also a finding that

she had benefited from the unpaid taxes since they allowed her to devote her

own earnings towards the expenses of getting a PhD and sending her children

to private schools. Perhaps the unkindest cut of all:

Additionally, her admission that she is using the remaining $80,000 from

the settlement with the Schumann firm to finance this litigation further

undermines her claim for relief. Karam questionably asserts “economic

hardship” while possessing a large litigation fund that she could use to make

10 Stocks to Hold Forever

Buy them, forget about them, and never

sell them.www.StreetAuthority.com

Best Dividend Stocks5 Stocks That are Cash Machines for Retirement. New Free Stock Report.wyattresearch.com/Dividends

Hold These Stocks ForeverThe 3 best stocks for a lifetime of rich cash dividends.www.GlobalDividends.com

Divorce Lawyers -Frequently Not The Best Tax Advisors

Peter J Reilly

Contributor

Page 4 of 8Joint Returns Need Warning Labels - Forbes

3/5/2013http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/2012/11/24/joint-returns-need-warning-labels/?goback=%2Egde_4816727_member_219604712

Page 5: Labels - My CFOmycfo-mycpa.com/...JoinRetrnsNeedWarningLabels.pdf · Labels Theresa Karam was denied innocent spouse status by the Tax Court and has lost on appeal to the Sixth Circuit

Inside Forbes

0

Top Journalism Schools

2013 Luxury Hotels

Best Business Schools

Certified Financial Advisers

Blogging Tools

Careers in Journalism

Online Business Plan

Content Writing Jobs

See Also:

Penny stocks might be the secret to becoming rich overnight...

Celebrity doctor reveals the #1 pill

to lose weight fast....

Men: You need to see this trick to

help you build muscle fast. You won't believe it...

partial payments on her tax debt. The equities of the situation are not in her

favor.

Robert Steinberg in his The Tax Wars Blog wrote about the original Tax Court

decision last year. He suggested that preparers add a paragraph, which he

provides, to engagement or transmittal letters warning about the implications

of filing a joint return. The idea has merit, but when I think about how long

some engagement letters already are, the value of adding another paragraph,

beyond CYA for the preparer, is limited. What is really important is for

preparers to be alert to the situations where separate filing might be the best

course. A pile of delinquent returns with large balances is such a situation.

Making the large balances a little less large might not be worth giving IRS

collections people another person to pursue. It is also important for the

preparer to recognize that the interests of the couple might not be aligned in

situations like that.

You can follow me on twitter @peterreillycpa.

11 93 13 0 0

Comment Now Follow Comments

Page 5 of 8Joint Returns Need Warning Labels - Forbes

3/5/2013http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/2012/11/24/joint-returns-need-warning-labels/?goback=%2Egde_4816727_member_219604712

Page 6: Labels - My CFOmycfo-mycpa.com/...JoinRetrnsNeedWarningLabels.pdf · Labels Theresa Karam was denied innocent spouse status by the Tax Court and has lost on appeal to the Sixth Circuit

Print Report Corrections Reprints & Permissions

From Around the Web

Billionaires Dump

Stocks. Prepare For

Unthinkable. (See

What's Your Shoe

Personality?

The Secret to Paying

No Interest on Credit

Cards

Speed Up Your PC -

Tricks Manufacturers

Hate

How to Exercise Your

Brain to Make It

Strong

How New iPads are

Selling for Under $40

How You Can Learn a

Language in Only 10

Days

How Cruise Lines Fill

All Those Unsold

Cruise Cabins

Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.

Page 6 of 8Joint Returns Need Warning Labels - Forbes

3/5/2013http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/2012/11/24/joint-returns-need-warning-labels/?goback=%2Egde_4816727_member_219604712

Page 7: Labels - My CFOmycfo-mycpa.com/...JoinRetrnsNeedWarningLabels.pdf · Labels Theresa Karam was denied innocent spouse status by the Tax Court and has lost on appeal to the Sixth Circuit

Channels Company Info Affiliate Sites Data Partners Publications

Enter Your Comment

Forbes writers have the ability to call out member comments they find

particularly interesting. Called-out comments are highlighted across the Forbes

network. You'll be notified if your comment is called out.

The names, numbers and stories behind the 1,426 people

who control the global economy.

Forbes Billionaires 2013: The Richest People In The World

Vietnam's First Billionaire Best Cities For Good Jobs

Detroit: The Most Miserable City In America

Real-Time Billionaires

Page 7 of 8Joint Returns Need Warning Labels - Forbes

3/5/2013http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/2012/11/24/joint-returns-need-warning-labels/?goback=%2Egde_4816727_member_219604712

Page 8: Labels - My CFOmycfo-mycpa.com/...JoinRetrnsNeedWarningLabels.pdf · Labels Theresa Karam was denied innocent spouse status by the Tax Court and has lost on appeal to the Sixth Circuit

Business

Investing

Technology

Entrepreneurs

Op/Ed

Leadership

Lifestyle

Lists

Forbes Careers

Advertising Information

Forbes Conferences

Investment Newsletters

Reprints & Permissions

Terms and Conditions

Privacy Statement

Contact Us

Sitemap

Help

Forbes China

Forbes India

Forbes Israel

Forbes Middle East

Forbes Poland

Forbes Romania

Forbes Russia

Forbes Ukraine

RealClear Politics

RealClear Markets

RealClear World

RealClear Sports

Market Data by Morningstar

Thomson Reuters

AdChoices

Free Trial Issue

Subscriber Services

Buy Back Issues

2013 Forbes.com LLC™ All Rights Reserved

Recommended + find more to followInside The 2013 Billionaires List: Facts and Figures

Page 8 of 8Joint Returns Need Warning Labels - Forbes

3/5/2013http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/2012/11/24/joint-returns-need-warning-labels/?goback=%2Egde_4816727_member_219604712