17
SUMMARY The title of this experiment is orifice and free jet flow. The objectives are to determine the coefficient of velocity, the coefficient of contraction and the coefficient of discharge for two small orifices. The method used throughout this experiment is taking the measurement of jet trajectories under steady flow conditions. The coefficient of velocity is estimated from the gradient of the graph root of yH against x. The coefficient of discharge is obtained from plotting the square root of the head against the volumetric flow rate. The coefficient of contraction is from calculation using the equation C c =C d /C v . From the experiment that has been carried out, it is found that the coefficient of velocity, C v can be taken to an average, since the values are similar for each diameter of orifice and different heads taken. Whereas values of the coefficient of discharge, C d cannot be taken to an average since both values of C d for 3 mm and 6 mm orifice sizes are not similar to each other. Other details of the experiment can be found in the following sections. 1

Lab - Orifice

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

lab report

Citation preview

Page 1: Lab - Orifice

SUMMARY

The title of this experiment is orifice and free jet flow. The

objectives are to determine the coefficient of velocity, the coefficient of

contraction and the coefficient of discharge for two small orifices.

The method used throughout this experiment is taking the

measurement of jet trajectories under steady flow conditions. The

coefficient of velocity is estimated from the gradient of the graph root

of yH against x. The coefficient of discharge is obtained from plotting

the square root of the head against the volumetric flow rate. The

coefficient of contraction is from calculation using the equation

Cc=Cd/Cv.

From the experiment that has been carried out, it is found that

the coefficient of velocity, Cv can be taken to an average, since the

values are similar for each diameter of orifice and different heads

taken. Whereas values of the coefficient of discharge, Cd cannot be

taken to an average since both values of Cd for 3 mm and 6 mm orifice

sizes are not similar to each other. Other details of the experiment can

be found in the following sections.

1

Page 2: Lab - Orifice

Theory

In practical situations, flow through a constriction into free space

is not very common though it does occur in liquid distributors, such as

in packed distillation column. However, similar situations occur in more

common situations, e.g. an orifice plate for flow measurement. In such

enclosed locations, the jet characteristics are harder to study, so free

jet is a convenient experimental model.

Orifice is an aperture through which fluid passes and its

thickness (in the direction of flow) is very small in comparison with its

other measurements. An orifice is used for flow-metering purposes has

a sharp edge so there are minimum contact with the fluid.

Based on Bernoulli equation, fluid that moves from the liquid

surface in the tank to the jet leaving from the orifice, it is seen that the

loss of potential is balanced by the gain in kinetic energy. Assumption

has been made that the pressure is the same at liquid surface and in

the jet.

Hence taking initial velocity in the tank as zero, per unit mass of fluid :

gH = vi2 / 2 (1)

Where vi is the ideal fluid velocity. If actual velocity, v in the discharge

plane was measured it would differ from the ideal velocity vi

We define a Coefficient of Velocity (Cv) as

2

Page 3: Lab - Orifice

Cv = v / vi (2)

The actual velocity can be deduced from the jet trajectory by

resolving the trajectory in the x and y directions. The horizontal

component x can be assumed remain constant, neglecting air

resistance, so that in time t, it travel by a distance of

x = vt

(3)

The vertical component changes under the influence of gravity, so that

at a time t, it is represented by :

y = gt2 / 2 (4)

Combining those equations 1-4 gives an expression Cv in terms of x, y,

and H

x = 2 Cv √yH

(5)

Therefore graph √yH versus x gives slope 2 Cv.

Also when a jet discharged from a sharp edged orifice, the jet is

smaller in diameter than the orifice.

This leads to the definition of the Coefficient of Contraction (Cc)as :

Cc = Jet Area = Ac (6)

Orifice Area Ao

The Coefficient of Discharge (Cd) is defined as the ratio of actual

flow rate Q (m3/s) to the ideal flow rate, which can be calculated from

the orifice area. The ideal mass flow rate is that which would occur if

the ideal velocity of flow (Vi) existed through the full area of the

orifice :

Cd = Q = Q .

3

Page 4: Lab - Orifice

Ao vi Ao √ 2gH

Alternatively Cd can be expressed in terms of the coefficient of velocity

and contraction :

Cd = CcCv

RESULTS

Table 1.1 : Orifice : 3mm Head : 395mm

Needle x (m) y (m) √yH (m)0 0.00 0 01 0.05 0.022 0.0932 0.10 0.029 0.1073 0.15 0.040 0.1264 0.20 0.051 0.1425 0.25 0.065 0.1606 0.30 0.087 0.1857 0.35 0.092 0.191

Table 1.2 : Orifice : 3mm Head : 260mm

Needle x (m) y (m) √yH (m)

0 0.00 0 0

1 0.05 0.025 0.081

2 0.10 0.035 0.095

3 0.15 0.048 0.112

4 0.20 0.066 0.131

5 0.25 0.091 0.154

6 0.30 0.115 0.173

7 0.35 0.144 0.193

4

Page 5: Lab - Orifice

Table 2.1 : Orifice : 6mm Head : 395mm

Needle x (m) y (m) √yH (m)0 0.00 0 01 0.05 0.024 0.0972 0.10 0.035 0.1173 0.15 0.042 0.1284 0.20 0.054 0.1465 0.25 0.069 0.1656 0.30 0.088 0.1867 0.35 0.090 0.189

Table 2.2 : Orifice : 6mm Head : 255mm

Needle x (m) y (m) √yH (m)

0 0.00 0 0

1 0.05 0.025 0.080

2 0.10 0.033 0.092

3 0.15 0.045 0.107

4 0.20 0.066 0.130

5 0.25 0.091 0.152

6 0.30 0.119 0.174

7 0.35 0.150 0.196

5

Page 6: Lab - Orifice

Table 3.1 : Orifice : 3mm

Needle

Head (m)√Head

(m)^0.5

Volume collected

(ml)

Volume collected

(m3)

Time (s)

Flowrate (m3/s)

1 0.395 0.6285 141 0.000141 100.000014

1

2 0.380 0.6164 136 0.000136 100.000013

6

3 0.360 0.6000 134 0.000134 100.000013

4

4 0.340 0.5831 132 0.000132 100.000013

2

5 0.320 0.5657 130 0.000130 100.000013

0

6 0.300 0.5477 128 0.000128 100.000012

8

7 0.280 0.5292 124 0.000124 100.000012

4

8 0.260 0.5099 120 0.000120 100.000012

0

Table 3.2 : Orifice : 6mm

Needle

Head (m)√Head

(m)^0.5

Volume collected

(ml)

Volume collected

(m3)

Time (s)

Flowrate (m3/s)

1 0.395 0.6285 220 0.000220 40.000055

0

2 0.375 0.6124 206 0.000206 40.000051

5

3 0.355 0.5958 204 0.000204 40.000051

0

4 0.335 0.5788 198 0.000198 40.000049

5

5 0.315 0.5612 194 0.000194 40.000048

5

6 0.295 0.5431 186 0.000186 40.000046

5

7 0.275 0.5244 182 0.000182 40.000045

5

8 0.255 0.5050 176 0.000176 40.000044

0

6

Page 7: Lab - Orifice

Graph 1: Jet trajectories for two orifice sizes at the different flow rates

Jet Trajectories For Both Orifices at Different Head

-0.16

-0.14

-0.12

-0.10

-0.08

-0.06

-0.04

-0.02

0.00

0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40

Vertical Distance, x (m)

Hor

izon

tal D

istance, y

(m)

Orifice=3mm,Head=395mm

Orifice=3mmHead=260mm

Orifice=6mmHead=395 mm

Orifice=6mmHead=255 mm

The coefficient of velocity, Cv can be estimated by plotting the

root of yH against x, where the graph gives a gradient of Cv.

7

Page 8: Lab - Orifice

Graphs of √yH against x

Graph 2.1 Orifice : 3mm Head : 260mm

√yH against x

y = 0.5693x + 0.0043

0.0000

0.0500

0.1000

0.1500

0.2000

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35

x (m)

Roo

t of yH (m

)

Graph 2.2 Orifice : 3mm Head : 395mm

8

Page 9: Lab - Orifice

√yH against x

y = 0.5179x + 0.0385

0.0000

0.0500

0.1000

0.1500

0.2000

0.2500

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35

x (m)

Roo

t of yH (m

)

Graph 2.3 Orifice : 6mm Head : 255mm

√yH against x

y = 0.504x + 0.0294

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35

x (m)

Roo

t of yH (m)

Graph 2.4 Orifice : 6mm Head : 395mm

9

Page 10: Lab - Orifice

√yH against x

y = 0.5172x + 0.0424

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35

x (m)

Roo

t of yH (m)

Below are the graphs of the square root of the head against the

volumetric flow rate. The gradient of the graph will give the value for

the discharge coefficient.

Graph 3.1 √head against Flow Rate for Orifice = 3mm

Square Root of Head against Volumetric Flowrate

y = 62001x - 0.2373

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.0000115 0.0000120 0.0000125 0.0000130 0.0000135 0.0000140 0.0000145

Volumetric Flowrate (m3/s)

Squar

e Root of Hea

d

Graph 3.2 √head against Flow Rate for Orifice = 6mm

10

Page 11: Lab - Orifice

Square Root of Head against Volumetric Flowrate

y = 11843x - 0.0109

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.00004 0.00004 0.00004 0.00005 0.00005 0.00005 0.00005 0.00005 0.00006

Volumetric Flowrate (m3/s)

Squar

e Root of Hea

d

DISCUSSION

Generally, the graphs of the jet trajectories for the two orifice

sizes at the different flow rates are decreasing. The slope of the graph

is much higher for the orifice of diameter 3mm compared with the

orifice of diameter 6mm. From the graph in Figure 1 and 2, it can seen

that the higher the flow rates, the less the gradient of the slope and

the less the degree of the decrease of the graph. The graph also shows

that the diameter of the orifice do not greatly affect the trajectory of

the water flowing out from the orifice. The trajectories differ greatly

because of the flow rates.

By using the coefficients of discharge and velocity, the jet

diameter at the vena contracta can be estimated. Based on both

coefficients obtained, the value for the jet diameter at the vena

contracta is 1.2460 x 10-3 m, which also equivalents to 1.2 mm. This

value seems not very reasonable as the real diameter used to find this

11

Page 12: Lab - Orifice

value is 6 mm. As soon as the water flows out from the orifice, the jet

diameter will get smaller.

Unlike the coefficient of velocity, values obtained for coefficient

of discharge for both orifice sizes are not similar to each other. This

means that the values cannot be taken to an average. This is because

both coefficient values are obtained from two different graphs, where

the coefficient of velocity obtained from the graph of root of yH against

the flow rate, whereas the coefficient of discharge is obtained from the

graph of root of H against the flow rate.

Like the coefficient of velocity, the values obtained for coefficient

of discharge, Cd for both orifice sizes also seem not similar to each

other. This situation may caused by any error that occurred during

taking the reading of the y value. However, if the average of the entire

gradient is calculated, the value of Cd obtained is 0.5106. From the

literature, the common value for Cd is in the range of 0.60 to 0.65.

Therefore, common errors done by human could affect the

readings and as well as the theory which would be inappropriate value

to be obtained from experiment.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, it can be said that the diameter of the orifice have not much effect

on the trajectory of the water flowing out from the orifice. But, the head of the water is

found to have more effect on the trajectory than the diameter of the orifice. The

coefficient of velocity, Cv can be estimated by plotting the root of yH against x, where the

graph gives a gradient of Cv .The coefficient of velocity of water is taken to an average

since all values are similar. Therefore, the objective of this experiment has been obtained.

12

Page 13: Lab - Orifice

Appendix

Coefficient of Velocity, Cv:

The coefficient of velocity, Cv can be estimated by plotting the root of yH against x,

where the graph gives a gradient of Cv. From graph 2.3 and 2.4, which is for 6mm orifice

plate, the average value for Cv is 0.5106.

Coefficient of Discharge, Cd:

The value of Cd can be obtained by calculating the gradient of the straight line of √H

against Q graph. From graph 3.2, the value for Cd is 11.84.

Coefficient of Contraction, Cc:

Jet diameter at the vena contracta, Dc:

13

Page 14: Lab - Orifice

14