Lab Oral Presentation1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Lab Oral Presentation1

    1/17

    To be presented to : Mr. Wan Mohd Wardi bin

    Wan Abdul Rahman

    GROUP MEMBERS

    MUHAMMAD HASMADI B. HASSIM

    CD100095NG KEI HOACD100333NIK NUR MARDIAH BINTI NIK MD YUSUFFCD100071NOOR ALIAA BINTI NAWAWI

    CD100216

    FACULTY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURINUNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA

  • 7/31/2019 Lab Oral Presentation1

    2/17

    i. To identify the plant parameters, and ii. To determine the transfer function of two

    degree of freedom (DOF) rectilinear plant.

    i. To configure the two degree of freedomrectilinear plant for system identification

    purposesii. Calculate the plant parameters, andiii. Find the transfer function of two degreeof freedom (DOF) rectilinear plant.

  • 7/31/2019 Lab Oral Presentation1

    3/17

    2 DOF

    PLANT

    FromLaplace

    Sum Of AllForces

    F=MA

  • 7/31/2019 Lab Oral Presentation1

    4/17

    Also can be expressed in this form for individual componentsof transfer function where is the natural frequency and is the damping ratio

  • 7/31/2019 Lab Oral Presentation1

    5/17

    Spring :Low stiffness = 200N/mHigh stiffness = 800N/m

    Encoder 1 & 2 Dashpot Electromechanical plant System interface software Real-time controller & I/O

  • 7/31/2019 Lab Oral Presentation1

    6/17

    Spring stiffness = 200N/m Encoder 1 & 2

    With mass (2kg)

    Without mass

    With dashpot Spring stiffness = 800N/m

    Encoder 1 & 2

    With mass (2kg)

    Without mass With dashpot

    Velocity

    A total of 13 graphsMust be obtained at

    the end of thisexperiment

  • 7/31/2019 Lab Oral Presentation1

    7/17

    With mass took longer time to oscillate andvise versa.

    Higher stiffness cause spring to oscillatemore compare to low stiffness.

    With dashpot, spring will oscillate lesscompare to without dashpot.

  • 7/31/2019 Lab Oral Presentation1

    8/17

    With mass : High momentum

    High vibration

    High inertia

    Took longer time Low frequency

    Low speed

  • 7/31/2019 Lab Oral Presentation1

    9/17

    Without mass low momentum

    low vibration

    low inertia

    Took less time high frequency

    high speed

  • 7/31/2019 Lab Oral Presentation1

    10/17

    With dashpot low momentum

    low vibration

    low inertia

    Took shorter time for neutralize high frequency

    high speed

    Absorb vibration

  • 7/31/2019 Lab Oral Presentation1

    11/17

    K = 200N/m With mass, Encoder #1

    Hzstime

    cyclesf 062.2

    88.3

    8

    956.12)062.2(2211 fdm Rad/s

    112

    11

    1 m

    d

    nm

    srad/978.12058.01

    956.12

    2

    058.0

    80

    1400ln

    )8(2

    1ln

    2

    10

    11

    n

    mXX

    n

  • 7/31/2019 Lab Oral Presentation1

    12/17

    K = 200N/m Without mass, Encoder #1

    Hzstime

    cyclesf 4

    75.1

    7

    133.25)4(2211 fdm

    112

    11

    1 m

    d

    nm

    srad/206.25076.01

    72.2

    2

    076.0

    50

    1390ln

    )7(2

    1ln

    2

    10

    11

    n

    mX

    X

    n

  • 7/31/2019 Lab Oral Presentation1

    13/17

    K = 200N/m With mass, Encoder #1

  • 7/31/2019 Lab Oral Presentation1

    14/17

    K = 200N/m Without mass, Encoder #1

  • 7/31/2019 Lab Oral Presentation1

    15/17

    The plant parameters can be determined. The transfer function rectilinear plant can be

    identified.

    Able to understand the control of vibration oftranslation mechanical system

    Understand the application of damper.

  • 7/31/2019 Lab Oral Presentation1

    16/17

    Automatic Train

  • 7/31/2019 Lab Oral Presentation1

    17/17

    Car suspension and absorber system