25
La Sal Mountain Impact Structure, Moab, Utah Tim McElvain The La Sal Mountains are conventionally described as Mid-Tertiary, shallow emplacement, laccolithic structures , on a north-south axis, on a broad dome of about 600 meters of relief and 32 kilometers in diameter, and are more particularly described, copied and pasted from the following publication :

La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 1/25

La Sal Mountain Impact Structure,

Moab, Utah

Tim McElvain

The La Sal Mountains are conventionally described as Mid-Tertiary,

shallow emplacement, laccolithic structures, on a north-south axis, on a

broad dome of about 600 meters of relief and 32 kilometers in diameter,

and are more particularly described, copied and pasted from the

following publication:

Page 2: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 2/25

Geology of the Tertiary Intrusive Centers of the La Sal Mountains, Utah— 

Influence of Preexisting Structural Features on Emplacement and

Morphology

 By

Michael L. Ross

http://pubs.usgs.gov/bul/b2158/B2158-9.pdf 

ABSTRACT

The results of geologic mapping and subsurface data interpretation, combined with

 previous regional gravity and magnetic surveys, define the structural setting and

emplacement history of the late Oligocene intrusive centers of the La SalMountains, Utah. The La Sal Mountains contain three intrusive centers: northern, middle,

and southern; they are located on a broad dome, which has about 600 meters of relief 

across a diameter of about 32 kilometers. The intrusions are estimated to have beenemplaced at shallow levels ranging between 1.9 and 6.0 kilometers. The intrusions are

holocrystalline and porphyritic and have a very fine- to fine grained groundmass.

 

INTRODUCTION

The La Sal Mountains of southeastern Utah are one of several mountain ranges in the

central Colorado Plateau that contain hypabyssal intrusion-cored domes (fig. 1). Ingeneral, these intrusions have similar morphologies, lithologies, and chemical

compositions (Eckel and others, 1949; Hunt and others, 1953; Hunt, 1958; Witkind,1964; Ekren and Houser, 1965). A common form for these shallow intrusions is a

laccolith, as initially described by Gilbert (1877) in the Henry Mountains. Therefore, the

Page 3: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 3/25

intrusive centers are commonly referred to as laccolithic centers.

Figure 1 Michael L. Ross

Page 4: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 4/25

 

Page 5: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 5/25

Figure 2 Michael L. Ross

 

Figure 3 Michael L. Ross

Page 6: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 6/25

Figure 4 Michael L. Ross

Page 7: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 7/25

 

Figure 5 Michael L. Ross

Page 8: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 8/25

Figure 6 Michael L. Ross

 

Page 9: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 9/25

Figure 7 Michael L. Ross

GEOLOGY OF THE LA SAL

MOUNTAINS

 

The La Sal Mountains consists of three distinct clusters of peaks separated by high

 passes: the northern, middle, and southern La Sal Mountains (fig. 4). Each of themountain clusters is an intrusive center consisting of hypabyssal intrusions of trachyte

and rhyolite porphyries emplaced as laccoliths, plugs, sills, and dikes. The three intrusive

centers in the La Sal Mountains intruded upper Paleozoic and Mesozoic sedimentaryrocks and have a north-south alignment (fig. 2). As first recognized by Gould (1926),

 both the northern and southern mountains are cored by large elliptical igneous intrusions

elongated northwest-southeast. The La Sal Mountains intrusive centers are on a broad

dome that has approximately 600 m of relief across a diameter of about 32 km. Regionalmagnetic data suggest there is no large intrusion in the subsurface below the La Sal

Mountains from which the intrusive centers were supplied. The magnetic low at the LaSal Mountains indicates that no such intrusion is present within 11–14 km beneath themountains (Case and others, 1963). I On the southwest flank of the northern mountains

dome, the sedimentary rocks are abruptly folded from a dip of 5° to dips of 60°–90°

southwest, forming a northwest trending monocline (fig. 5, section A–A' ). Triassic strataare in near-vertical contact with the hornblende plagioclase trachyte pluton along the

entire flank. A thin contact-metamorphic aureole of hornfels indicates minimal baking of 

the country rock along the contact. At several locations, Triassic strata adjacent to the

Page 10: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 10/25

 pluton form thin breccia zones. This clast-supported breccia has well-indurated clasts in a

matrix of calcite and crushed rock. Many of the frost-heaved Lower Jurassic Glen

Canyon Group sandstone blocks that cover the large flatiron ridge of the monocline haveslickenside surfaces and cataclastic shear bands. The breccia zones, slickensides, and

shear bands suggest near-bedding-plane faulting and stretching of the sedimentary rocks

as they were arched across the main igneous pluton. Similar features have been describedon the flanks of the laccolithic domes in the southern Henry Mountains (Johnson and

Pollard, 1973; Jackson and Pollard, 1988a). Along most of the northeast flank of the

northern mountains, Triassic and Jurassic strata dip about 45°–50° and 45°–60° northeast,respectively (fig. 5). The pluton– country rock contact along this flank appears to be

nearly vertical or to dip slightly northeast. At La Sal Peak, the structure is complex

 because the hornblende plagioclase trachyte intrusion breached the flank of the anticline

and was injected as much as 1.7 km into the flanking rocks (fig. 5, section (A–A' ). The best inference for the elevation of the pluton’s floor may be one that derives fro m the

observation that the underlying salt diapir does not appear to have dissolved. If it had, it

would have caused collapse of the extended parts of the pluton. An elevation of 2,400– 

2,700 m for the floor of the main pluton would be significantly higher (>500 m) than thelevel of collapse and the upper surface of the salt diapir in adjacent Castle Valley. The

 breccias found in the intrusive pipes range from crackle breccia to matrix-supported breccia. The matrix is predominantly calcite and includes subordinate amounts of quartz,

crushed rock, and opaque grains. Quartz veins, stockworks, and pods are locally present.

Hematite pseudomorphs after various sulfides are common. At the northwest end of the

northern mountains, other discrete areas of similar breccias are present near the marginsof the main pluton and adjacent to the quartz plagioclase trachyte body. In these breccias

clast types are variable: some contain only fragments of either Triassic rock and

(or) Glen Canyon Group sandstone, some have only fragments of hornblende plagioclasetrachyte or quartz plagioclase trachyte, and at least one contains a mixture of both

sedimentary and igneous rock fragments. The breccia formed at the sedimentary-igneous

contact because of either forceful emplacement of magma or the release of volatile-richfluids. Intrusions of the La Sal Mountains were probably emplaced at depths ranging

 between 1.9 and 6.0 km. These depths of emplacement are consistent with emplacement

depths for the Henry and Abajo Mountains laccoliths (Witkind, 1964; Jackson andPollard, 1988a).

MACROSCOPIC AND MICROSCOPIC EVIDENCE 

OF SHOCK METAMORPHISM RESULTING

 FROM   AN EXTRATERRESTRIAL  IMPACT  EVENT 

Page 11: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 11/25

The above photomicrograph is of a quartz grain with at least two sets of 

 planar microstructures (PM's) that fit the scale of planar deformation

features (PDF's) from a sandstone stringer within a Triassic? Redbed located

at the 8000 foot level of the La Sal Mountains.

Page 12: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 12/25

 Figure 8-a

Page 13: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 13/25

Figure 8b

Figure 8-a and 8b – are photomicrographs of a quartz grain with planar microstructures

(PM's) from a sandstone stringer within a Triassic? Redbed located at the 8000 foot levelof the La Sal Mountains.

Page 14: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 14/25

The above photomicrograph is of a quartz grain with at least two sets of 

 planar microstructures (PM's) that fit the scale of planar deformation

features (PDF's)from a sandstone stringer within a Triassic? Redbed located

at the 8000 foot level of the La Sal Mountains.

Page 15: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 15/25

Blob of melt with spherules adjacent to a quartz grain with two sets of PM's

 probably PDF's illustrating the propensity of porous sandstone to

concentrate a shock wave causing melting and the formation of planar 

microstructures. This melt is on the same thin section as the hotomicrograph

above.

Page 16: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 16/25

Figure 10 - Photograph of the breccia zone mapped in figure 1 and 3 above,

exhibiting what appear to be vertical beds probably formed by flow of the

clastic, melt dike as it was inserted between the mote and central uplift of the

La Sal Mountain Impact Structure.

Page 17: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 17/25

Figure 11 - Photograph of an igneous clast with the above mentioned clastic

dike.

Page 18: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 18/25

Figure 12 -Photograph of a sandstone clast with the above mentioned clastic

dike.

Page 19: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 19/25

Figure 13 -Photograph of a rounded cobble clast that was rounded and

 polished in the excavation stage of the impact crater a clast in the above

mentioned clastic dike. Kord Ernston and Fernando Claudin in their web

site, Ernstson Cladin Impact Structures, The Perlarda Formation,

http://www.impact-structures.com/., show examples of clasts rounded

and polished in the excavation stage of an impact crater.

Page 20: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 20/25

Figure 14 - Photomicrograph of high relief glass within the above clastic

dike (the black circle is an ink mark on the thin section).

Page 21: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 21/25

Figure 15 - Same view of the thin section in figure 14 above illuminated

with cross polarized light illustrating the glassy nature of the clastic dike

matrix and in some cases clasts.

Page 22: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 22/25

Figure 16 - Detail view of the high relief glass illustrated in figures 14 and

15 above.

Page 23: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 23/25

Figure 17 - Photomicrograph of the melt matrix of the clastic dike

illustrating flow structure and the formation of phenocrysts.

Page 24: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 24/25

Figure 18 - Photomicrograph of a toasted and partially melted quartz grain

within the same sandstone stringer in figures 8 and 9 above with what appear 

to be remnant planar microstructures.

Page 25: La Sal Mountain Impact  Structure

8/4/2019 La Sal Mountain Impact Structure

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/la-sal-mountain-impact-structure 25/25

Figure 19 - Photomicrograph of the same grain in figure 18 above

illuminated by cross polarized light.

Conclusion

All of the above evidence I believe confirms that the La Sal Mountains,

Moab Utah are the remnant of the central uplift of a multiringed or possibly

 peak ringed impact structure.