Upload
leo-sherman
View
214
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Kypros-net Web Site:Learn Greek! On-line Course
SI 622
Evaluation of Systems and Services
M. Elledge
P. Zaphiris
4/15/00
The Project
• Evaluate Learn Greek! language course– Usability– Functionality– Quality
• Client: Kypros-net Originator/Administrator
Learn Greek! Course
• Course Description– Independent study course to learn Greek
• 105 audio lessons, transcriptions, vocabulary, spell checker, dictionary
– Objectives• Assist people in learning Greek language
• Develop site using User Participation philosophy
• Minimize expense (tapes from Cyprus Broadcasting Corporation (CyBC) radio; volunteers; MIT server)
Methods Used
• Interviews with site creator, content contributors (2), director and administrator of U-M
• Forty-three user surveys, 371 discussion board postings
• Literature search of PsychInfo and Wilson databases
• Comparative Evaluation with 16 web language sites
• User testingUser testing of 8 tasks with 5 subjects
• GTN for first two levels
• Metaphor, Vocabulary analyses
• Checklist/Cognitive walk-through on course
• GOMS on 2 tasks
Key Client Questions
• How useful is the course?
• How functional is the course?
• How well does it meet on-line course standards?
• What can be done to improve the course?
Question #1
• How useful is the course?– Does it meet client objectives?– Does it meet user expectations?
• Findings– Client objectives exceeded– User expectations met– Still, there are complaints
Findings
• Client Objectives– Participatory Design: 105 lessons transcribed
by 8 users; dictionary, spell checker installed by users; on-going help provided by users
– Steady increase in site visits over timeGreek Online Access Statistics
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
Week Ending
Findings
• User Expectations– High user satisfaction
1.51.5 1.5
1.4
1.11.1
0.9 0.9
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Overall Ease ofuse
Overallsatisfaction
Simple to use Easy to Learn Info Effectiveto Complete
Tasks
CompleteWork
Efficiently
Easy to FindInfo
InformationClear
Findings
– Positive Comments:
• EASY TO UNDERSTAND
• Fun
• It helped refresh my Greek
• Finally after surfing for a long time I found that you could learn Greek from the internet
• It is a very progressive course, builds up confidence as it goes
• Very good method of learning
• It falls into place after listening a couple of times.
• Greek is the most kick-butt language on earth!!!!
Findings
• Some User Complaints– Can’t download lessons– No pronunciation guide– Can’t compare text with lessons– Few instructions or information about course
content
Discussion Board PostingsCategory/Subject # % Total %TechnicalProblems with needing/installing keyboard fonts 56 15.1%Problems with/wanting to download lessons 49 13.2%Problems with installing/using RealPlayer 40 10.8% 39.1%
ContentPostings of on-line notes 73 19.7%Questions about availability of text, CDs or
including links to web sites 37 10.0% 29.7%
ComprehensionQuestions about vocabulary 28 7.5%Questions about grammar/spelling 17 4.6%Questions about dialect 2 5.4% 17.5%
Miscellaneous 69 18.6% 18.6%
Question #2
• How functional is the course?– Do the operations work?– Is the architecture successful?
• Findings– Site is subject to Internet vagaries– Learn Greek! architecture can be improved
Findings
• Operations– ON the site generally work
• Translations, lessons, etc. function
• Waiting can become tedious
– Web operations less dependable• Server downtime
• Slow lesson downloads
• Intermittent transmission
Findings
• Architecture– Layout
• Violates requirement for visual integrity
• Inconsistent formatting
– Labeling• Confusing (Greek to English in Greek?)
• Incorrect (Vocabulary/notes = transcripts?)
• Out-of-order (Instructions after the task?)
Findings
• Architecture (cont.)– Content
• Few instructions (RealPlayer, Greek fonts)
• No “Help” or FAQ
• Multiple translations
– Navigation• Hard to find things (transcripts)
• Search engine can’t target course
Question #3
• Does it meet language course standards?– Is the content appropriate?– Is the methodology appropriate?
• Findings– Fairly unusual: hybrid of independent study +
web-based learning– Pedagogy okay, course content can be
enhanced
Conclusions
• Yin/Yang: Strengths are also weaknesses– Accessibility vs. dependability– Participation vs. consistency– Frugality vs. thoroughness