Kudzu: Hate It or Love It

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/10/2019 Kudzu: Hate It or Love It

    1/4

    Anthony Zamora

    Ms. Parsons

    BIO 102-040

    8 February 2011

    Kudzu: Hate It or Love It

    In the past 100 years a great amount of weedy vascular plants has been introduced

    globally. Several among these exotic species have begun to seriously threaten the existence of

    native vegetation in many plant communities (Rosen 82). Pueraria montana, better known as

    kudzu, was introduced from Asia in 1876 (Brink 1942). It was highly esteemed for its ability tocontrol soil erosion, provide food for livestock, and rejuvenate soil fertility. With kudzus

    stupendous growth rate and twisty climbing habits, however, kudzu is extremely tough to keep

    under control. Kudzu is now considered to be a major problem as it kills trees and shrubs and

    suppresses natural regeneration. Also, kudzu is noted to be an economic problem, as it has taken

    over many acres of valuable timberland.

    Kudzu is a deep rooted, perennial, leguminous vine with stems that may reach more than

    seventy feet in a single growing season. Under ideal soil conditions the roots may penetrate up to

    three feet deep or more, and roots as deep as six feet have been found (Rosen 1982). Kudzu

    grows most efficiently in the humid Southeast, but it will grow reasonably well in the Southwest

    when irrigated.

    Kudzu was strongly promoted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture during the 1930s

    and 1940s. This plant was known to grow sprucely in unfavored conditions, produce a dense

    ground cover to protect the surface of the soil, rejuvenate the fertility of eroded areas, protect

    highway banks, maintain itself without replanting, and provide food for livestock (Rosen 1982).

  • 8/10/2019 Kudzu: Hate It or Love It

    2/4

    Zamora 2

    During the time kudzu was introduced, soil erosion had become prominent in the south due to

    poor agricultural practices. Kudzu was not considered a pest by early writers. Most authors felt

    that kudzu could be easily eradicated by fire, plowing, or overgrazing. In a 1942 article Brink

    stated, Southern farming needs kudzu and more kudzu, needs it quickly and in quantity.

    Kudzu is now recognized as a seriously harmful weed. Kudzu inhibits the growth of new

    tree seedlings and can cover trees eighty feet tall (Rosen 1982). Recent investigations in 2010

    have led authors to believe that nitric oxide emissions from kudzu may be increasing ozone

    pollution (Kudzu goes from bad to worse). In an extreme scenario, extensive kudzu invasion

    leads directly to an increase in the number of high ozone events (above seventy ppb) of up toseven days each summer in some areas, up from ten to twenty days in a control scenario with no

    kudzu invasion (Hickman and Wu 2010).

    Treatment techniques include fire, grazing, herbicides, and mechanical treatment. The

    most effective herbicide known is Tordon (picloram). This herbicide is non-selective and

    eliminates all broadleaf plants, including trees, and stays active in the soil for approximately one

    year (Rosen 1982). According to Robertson, grazing has been determined to be effective and

    economical (1971). All kudzu was virtually eliminated from a 500 acre tract in three seasons of

    grazing. Spot treatments of herbicide were needed to kill the few remaining vines. A

    disadvantage to grazing is that it is almost impossible on steep slopes. Fire has been mentioned

    as a dependable pre-treatment to help with herbicide treatment. Since kudzu reproduces mainly

    vegetatively, new runners would grow quickly from the unharmed crowns (Rosen 1982).

    So, as we have seen, the kudzu plant that was once thought to be a savior, has now turned

    into quite a menace. Though animals can graze on it, the United States lacks a genuine natural

    predator for kudzu. I believe that introducing a natural predator of kudzu into the United States

  • 8/10/2019 Kudzu: Hate It or Love It

    3/4

  • 8/10/2019 Kudzu: Hate It or Love It

    4/4

    Zamora 4

    Works Cited

    Brink, W. Kudzu - a member of tattered lands. Better Crops with Plant Food. 26.1 (1942)

    10-13.

    Gjerstad, D.H., Ziska, L.H., Runion, G.B., Prior, S.A., Torbert III, H.A., Rogers Jr, H.H. 2006.

    The Potential Use of Kudzu as a Biofuel. Alternative Energy Solutions from Alabama's

    Natural Resources Conference. Web. 5 February 2011.

    Hickman, Jonathan E. and Shiliang Wu. Kudzu (Pueraria montana) invasion doubles emissions

    of nitric oxide and increases ozone pollution. Proceedings of the National Academy of

    Sciences. 107.22 (2010) 10115-10119.Kudzu goes from bad to worse. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 107.22

    (2010) 9917-9918.

    Robertson, W.J. How we controlled kudzu. Forest Farmer. 30.13 (1971) 8-9, 18.

    Rosen, Aaron. Feasibility Study: The Eradication of Kudzu with Herbicides and Revegetation

    with Native Tree Species in Two National Parks . U.S. Department of the Interior,

    National Park Service, Research/Resources Management Report SER_59.