19
KOOTENAI RIVER RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION Idaho Department of Fish and Game: 1988-065-00

KOOTENAI RIVER RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION

  • Upload
    emelda

  • View
    34

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

KOOTENAI RIVER RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION. Idaho Department of Fish and Game: 1988-065-00. Project Overview. Project responding to changes from Libby Dam. Comprised of multiple studies on white sturgeon, burbot, and native salmonids. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: KOOTENAI  RIVER   RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION

KOOTENAI RIVER RESIDENT FISH MITIGATIONIdaho Department of Fish and Game: 1988-065-00

Page 2: KOOTENAI  RIVER   RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION

Project Overview

Project responding to changes from Libby Dam

Comprised of multiple studies on white sturgeon, burbot, and native salmonids

Cooperative fishery evaluation of 1988-064-00; 1994-04-900; and 2002-002-00

Goal: Restore these fish populations to the Kootenai River

Page 3: KOOTENAI  RIVER   RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION

Project Objectives

Restore natural recruitment of white sturgeon

Restore natural recruitment of burbot

Increase resident salmonid densities

Page 4: KOOTENAI  RIVER   RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION

Kootenai River White Sturgeon

Problem: Temperature, discharge, and other physiochemical changes resulting from the operation of Libby Dam are not adequate for sturgeon recruitment.

12/29 2/17 4/8 5/28 7/17 9/5 10/25 12/140

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

1928-19721973-19901991-2011

Date

Dis

char

ge (m

3/se

c)

0

3

9

6

12+

River depth (m) at 8,500 m/s

ALLUVIAL SAND AND

SILT

COBBLE, GRAVEL, AND

SAND

Page 5: KOOTENAI  RIVER   RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION

Kootenai River White SturgeonAccomplishments

• Larval sturgeon habitat requirements identified 

• Rock Pile Pilot Study

• Understanding effects of Libby operations and spawning events

• Advanced egg development  sampled

Page 6: KOOTENAI  RIVER   RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION

Kootenai River White SturgeonAccomplishments

• Juveniles captured upstream of Bonners Ferry

• Larval sturgeon habitat requirements identified 

• Advanced egg development  sampled

• Rock Pile Pilot Study

• Understanding effects of Libby operations and spawning events

Page 7: KOOTENAI  RIVER   RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION

North American Journal of Fisheries Management 

• Paragamian, V. L., and M. J. Hansen. 2008. Evaluation of recovery goals for endangered white sturgeon in the Kootenai River, Idaho.

 Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science  

• Justice, C., B. J. Pyper, R. C. P. Beamesderfer, V. L. Paragamian, P. J. Rust, M. D. Neufeld, and S. C. Ireland. 2009. Evidence of density- and size-dependent mortality in hatchery-reared juvenile white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) in the Kootenai River.

 Journal of Fisheries Management and Ecology 

• Paragamian, V. L. and D. V. Wakkinen 2011. White sturgeon spawning and discharge augmentation. 

   Journal of Applied Ichthyology 

• Paragamian, V. L., R. McDonald, G. John Nelson, and G. Barton. 2009. Kootenai River velocities, depth, and white sturgeon spawning site selection – a mystery unraveled?

 • Neufeld, M. D. and Rust, P. J. 2009. Using passive sonic telemetry methods to evaluate

dispersal and subsequent movements of hatchery-reared white sturgeon in the Kootenay River.  

• Rust, P. J. 2011. Translocation of pre-spawn adult Kootenai River white sturgeon.

White Sturgeon Related Publications

Page 8: KOOTENAI  RIVER   RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION

• Determine effects of substrate additions to the Meander Reach

Proposed work • Expand sampling above Bonners Ferry

o Telemetry of large juveniles above Bonners Ferry

o Analyze movements in relation to habitat improvements.

o Effects of nutrients on growth.

o Egg mat sampling above Bonners Ferry

• Aid Libby Operations

• Free Embryo Releases

Page 9: KOOTENAI  RIVER   RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION

BurbotProblem: Temperature and discharge resulting from the operation of Libby Dam are not adequate for burbot spawning.

1-Oct

15-O

ct

29-O

ct

12-N

ov

26-N

ov

10-D

ec

24-D

ec7-J

an

21-Ja

n4-F

eb

18-Feb

4-Mar

18-M

ar0

100

200

300

400

500

600 Pre-Libby FlowsPost Libby Flows

Date

Disc

harg

e (m

3/s)

Page 10: KOOTENAI  RIVER   RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION

BurbotAccomplishments

• Burbot extensive rearing implemented

• Confirmed success of hatchery releases

• Burbot population targets identified

• Burbot flow SOR was recommended

• Stocking criteria identified

• Identification of variation in mitochondrial DNA

Page 11: KOOTENAI  RIVER   RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION

Burbot Related PublicationsJournal of Freshwater Ecology

• Paragamian, V. L., J. McCormick, and C. Laude. 2008. Changes in Population Indices of a Diminishing Burbot Population in the Kootenai River, Idaho, USA and British Columbia, Canada.

• Paragamian, V. L. 2010. Increase in abundance of signal crayfish may be due to decline in predators.

North American Journal of Fisheries Management • Paragamian, V. L. and M. J. Hansen. 2009. Rehabilitation needs for burbot in the Kootenai

River, Idaho, USA and British Columbia, Canada.

Journal of Applied Ichthyology• Paragamian, V. L. and M. J. Hansen 2011 (in Press) Stocking goals for rehabilitation of burbot

in the Kootenai River, Idaho, USA and British Columbia, Canada. • Paragamian, V. L., C. Laude, K. Cain, N, Jensen, and J. Barron 2011 (in press) Pen rearing

burbot larvae - a novel technique.

American Fisheries Society Symposium 59. • Hardy, R., and V. L., Paragamian. 2008. Zooplankton communities and burbot relative

abundance of some oligotrophic lakes in Idaho. • Paragamian, V. L., and V. D. Wakkinen. 2008. Seasonal movement and the interaction of

temperature and discharge on burbot in the Kootenai River, Idaho.• Paragamian, V. L., Pyper, B. J., M. J. Daigneault, R. P. Beamesderfer, and S. C. Ireland. 2008.

Population dynamics and extinction risk of burbot in the Kootenai River, Idaho.• Powell, M, V. L. Paragamian, and J. Dunnigan. 2008. Mitochondrial variation in Western North

American burbot with special reference to the Kootenai River in Idaho and Montana, USA.

Page 12: KOOTENAI  RIVER   RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION

Proposed work

• Evaluate natural production.

• Evaluate release sites on survival.

• Correlate optimal flow regime conducive to spawning.

• Extensive rearing ponds

• Aid ACOE in Libby Operations.

• Habitat selection of juvenile burbot.

Page 13: KOOTENAI  RIVER   RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION

Problem: Libby dam traps macro nutrients resulting in low fish production in the lower Kootenai River.

• Spawning and overwintering habitat seems to additionally limit rainbow trout recruitment.

Native Salmonids

Page 14: KOOTENAI  RIVER   RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION

Nutrient Addition• cooperative management with KTOI of nutrient addition site 

• sample fish metrics at established monitoring locations

Page 15: KOOTENAI  RIVER   RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION

Native Salmonids Accomplishments

• Six full years of nutrient additions

Page 16: KOOTENAI  RIVER   RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION

Native Salmonids Accomplishments

170 230 250 265 283 5650

100

200

300

400

500

600

Pre Treatment (2002-2005)

Post Treatment (2006-2011)

River Kilometer

CPU

E (fi

sh/h

)

Non-Treatment Reaches

Treatment Reaches

Page 17: KOOTENAI  RIVER   RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION

Proposed work• Continue cooperative nutrient

additions.

• Continue fishery evaluation at trend locations.

• Address limiting factors of growth and density with rainbow trout oOtolith microchemistry

oOverwintering habitat limitations

oDetermine success of rearing strategy

oHabitat improvements to increase spawning.

Page 18: KOOTENAI  RIVER   RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION

Questions

Page 19: KOOTENAI  RIVER   RESIDENT FISH MITIGATION

Native Salmonids Accomplishments

1980 1981 1993 1994 1998 1999 2004 2008 20110

2,000

4,000

6,000

8,000

10,000

12,000

14,000

16,000

18,000

20,000Mountain WhitefishLargescale SuckerRainbow Trout

Num

ber o

f Fis

h

Nutrients Added (2005)