7
KNR295 Sampling Slide 1 Sampling & External Validity Chapter 2

KNR295 Sampling Slide 1 Sampling & External Validity Chapter 2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: KNR295 Sampling Slide 1 Sampling & External Validity Chapter 2

KNR295Sampling

Slide 1

Sampling & External Validity

Chapter 2

Page 2: KNR295 Sampling Slide 1 Sampling & External Validity Chapter 2

KNR 295:Sampling

Slide 2External Validity: Critiquing

The sampling model…

Page 3: KNR295 Sampling Slide 1 Sampling & External Validity Chapter 2

KNR 295:Sampling

Slide 3External Validity: Critiquing

The sampling model… Goal (claim) is representative

sampling Often not attainable -

Who to generalize to? Availability of the true “representative” sample? Will the sample be representative of other

times?

An alternative is to model (or critique) the differences in a systematic way…

Page 4: KNR295 Sampling Slide 1 Sampling & External Validity Chapter 2

KNR 295:Sampling

Slide 4External Validity: Critiquing

Proximal similarity model (Campbell, 1963)

Page 5: KNR295 Sampling Slide 1 Sampling & External Validity Chapter 2

KNR 295:Sampling

Slide 5External Validity: Critiquing

Proximal similarity model (Campbell, 1963) The idea here is to quantify the

difference between the various properties of the study you are considering, and that to which you want to generalize, and then consider the likelihood that this difference would alter the research’s findings

Page 6: KNR295 Sampling Slide 1 Sampling & External Validity Chapter 2

KNR 295:Sampling

Slide 6External Validity: Critiquing

What to do? Evaluate, critique, consider… And if that fails, replicate

Page 7: KNR295 Sampling Slide 1 Sampling & External Validity Chapter 2

KNR 295:Sampling

Slide 7Sampling Terminology