KM Process II

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/20/2019 KM Process II

    1/9

    I.Vencatachellum/KM/2009 1

    KM Process

    Processes for knowledge management

    Generate

    Organise

    Develop

    Distributing

    References

  • 8/20/2019 KM Process II

    2/9

    I.Vencatachellum/KM/2009 2

    Processes for Knowledge Management

    March (1997)1.  Generating2.

     

    Organising

    3. 

    Developing

    4.  Distributing

    Soliman and Spooner (2000)

    1.  Create2.

     

    Capture

    3.  Organise

    4. 

    Access5.  Use knowledge

    Alavi and Leidner (2001)

    1.  Creation

    2.  Storage/retrieval3.  Transfer

    4.  Application

    Yahya and Goh (2002) – Five KM activities1.  Knowledge acquisition2.  Knowledge documentation

    3.  Knowledge transfer4.

     

    Knowledge creation

    5. 

    Knowledge application

    Dalkir (2005) – Integrated KM cycle1.  Knowledge capture and/or creation2.

     

    Knowledge sharing and dissemination

    3. 

    Knowledge acquisition and application

  • 8/20/2019 KM Process II

    3/9

    I.Vencatachellum/KM/2009 3

    Generating 

    Conscious and intentional generation of knowledge are the specific activitiesand initiatives firms undertake to increase their stock of corporateknowledge. (Davenport and Prusak, 2000)

    •  Acquisition

    •  Rental

    •  Dedicated resources

    •  Fusion

    •  Adaptation

    • 

     Networks

    Generating content involves two tasks, identifying the desired content

     proactively and getting people to contribute ideas. (March, 1997)

    Knowledge brokering – using old ideas as raw materials for a host of new

    ideas in wholly different contexts, ensuring that organisations innovate

    continuously. (Hargadon and Sutton, 2000)

  • 8/20/2019 KM Process II

    4/9

    I.Vencatachellum/KM/2009 4

    Knowledge creation involves developing new content or replacing existing

    content within the organisation’s tacit and explicit knowledge (Alavi andLeidner, 2001)

     Nonaka and Takeuchi’s spiral of knowledge creation - Interaction betweentacit and explicit knowledge creates knowledge (Four knowledge conversion

    modes).

  • 8/20/2019 KM Process II

    5/9

    I.Vencatachellum/KM/2009 5

    Creating common knowledge – Finding effective ways to translate ongoing

    experience into knowledge (Dixon, 2000).

    Organising 

    Organise the collected information so that it can be represented and retrieved

    electronically.

    •  Critical task – Avoid obsolescence.

    Developing

    Selection and further refinement of material to increase value for users.

    • 

    Develop a knowledge object – a module of information or knowledge

    that has been carved out of its original context for reuse in othersettings.

  • 8/20/2019 KM Process II

    6/9

    I.Vencatachellum/KM/2009 6

    Distributing

    Refers to how people gain access to material.• 

    Make it easy for people to find what they are looking for

    • 

    Encourage use and reuse of knowledge

    Five elements of knowledge transfer to consider (Alavi and Leidner, 2001):

    (1) perceived value of the source unit’s knowledge, (2) motivational

    disposition of the source , i.e. their willingness to share knowledge (3)

    existence and richness of transmission channels, (4) motivational dispositionof the receiving unit, i.e. their willingness to acquire knowledge from the

    source, and (5) the absorptive capacity of the receiving unit, defined as the

    ability not only to acquire and assimilate but also to use knowledge.

    Absorptive capacity – To absorb the new knowledge, a team or individual

    has to already have enough related knowledge, i.e. basic skills, shared

    language, and technical knowledge (N.Dixon, 2000).

    Soo et al . (2002)

    • 

    Individual level measures – active information and knowledgesourcing, recording and sharing, and knowledge accumulation behaviours such as participating in conferences, updating skills

    through training and self-learning, and keeping abreast of the latest

    technology.

    •  Organisational level measures – policies and procedures thatencourage and develop individuals’ absorptive capacity.

  • 8/20/2019 KM Process II

    7/9

    I.Vencatachellum/KM/2009 7

    Leverage common knowledge – transfer knowledge across time and space.

  • 8/20/2019 KM Process II

    8/9

    I.Vencatachellum/KM/2009 8

     Extracted from Dixon (2000).

     Extracted from Alavi and Leidner (2001). 

  • 8/20/2019 KM Process II

    9/9

    I.Vencatachellum/KM/2009 9

    References 

    Alavi, M. and Leidner, D.E. (2001), ‘Knowledge management and knowledgemanagement systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues’, MIS Quarterly,25.1, 107-136.

    Dalkir, K. (2005),  Knowledge Management in theory and Practice, Oxford: Elsevier

    Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Davenport, T.H. and Prusak, L. (2000), Working knowledge: How organisations manage

    what they know, Boston: HBSP.

    Dixon, N.M. (2000), Common Knowledge: How companies thrive by sharing what they

    know, Boston: HBSP.

    Hargadon, A. and Sutton, R.I. (2000), ‘Building an innovation factory’,  Harvard

     Business Review, May-June, 157-166.

    March, A. (1997), ‘A note on Knowledge Management’,  Harvard Business School , 26

     Nov., 1-20.

     Nonaka, I. (1991), ‘The knowledge-creating company’,  Harvard Business Review,

     November-December, 2-9.

    Soliman, F. and Spooner, K. (2000), ‘Strategies for implementing knowledge

    management: role of human resources management’,  journal of knowledge

    management , 4.4, 337-345.

    Soo, C., Devinney, T., Midgley, D. and Deering, A. (2002), ‘Knowledge management:

     philosophy, processes and pitfalls’, California Management review, 44.4, 129-

    150.

    Uit Beijerse, R.P (1999), ‘Questions in knowledge management: defining and

    conceptualizing a phenomenon’, Journal of Knowledge management , 3.2, 94-109.

    Yahya, S. and Goh, W.K (2002), ‘Managing human resources toward achieving

    knowledge management’, Journal of knowledge management , 6.5, 457-468.