20
Kinase inhibitors in localized and metastatic kidney cancers in metastatic kidney cancers in senior adult patients senior adult patients. Jean-Pierre Droz, MD, PhD Professor of Medical Oncology, Claude-Bernard Lyon 1 University Geriatric Oncology Program PROLOG program of the French National Cancer Institute Centre Léon-Bérard, Lyon, France

Kinase inhibitors in localized and metastatic kidney cancers ...Kinase inhibitors in localized and metastatic kidney cancers inmetastatic kidney cancers in senior adult patientssenior

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Kinase inhibitors in localized and metastatic kidney cancers inmetastatic kidney cancers in

    senior adult patientssenior adult patients.Jean-Pierre Droz, MD, PhD, ,

    Professor of Medical Oncology, Claude-Bernard Lyon 1 University Geriatric Oncology Program

    PROLOG program of the French National Cancer Institute Centre Léon-Bérard, Lyon, France

  • Three major pathological subgroupsThree major pathological subgroups.

    Clear cell Papillary Chromophobe cell

  • VEGF receptor blockade.

    VEGFBevacizumab

    VEGF

    VEGFR-2

    Vascular endothelial cellplasma membrane

    PI3K RafP PSorafenib

    AxitinibSorafenib

    Akt/PKB MEKP PVascular permeability

    SorafenibSunitinib

    p38MAPKErkEndothelial cell

    survival

    Endothelial cell

    Temsirolimus

    Rini B, et al. J Clin Oncl. 2005;23:1028-1043.

    Endothelial cell migration

    Endothelial cell proliferation

  • 0.80.91.0

    0 50.60.70.8

    0 20.30.40.5

    Sunitinib (n=375)M di t h d

    00.10.2 Median not reached

    IFN-α (N=375)Median not reached

    Hazard Ratio = 0.65(95% CI: 0.449–0.942)P = 0.0219*

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16Durée (Mois)

    Overall survival= S(ASCO 2008)

    Progression-freeSurvival= SSurvival= S

  • Hypertension 24%/8%

    Hand /foot syndrom 20%/5% Trials’inclusion criteriaNausea /vomiting 44%/3%Diarrhea 53%/5%

    Rash 19%/1%

    Trials inclusion criteriaand toxicities.

    Anemia 71%/3%

    Leucopenia /neutro 78%/5%

    Thrombocytopenia 65%/8%Median age 62 years (27-87)

    y p

    Asthenia 51%/7%

    Pain 11%/1%

    Anorexia NR

    Age > 70 years ?

    Perform. status ≥ 80 (100= 62%)Anorexia NR

    Hyperglycemia NR

    Lipids /lipase 30-40%/1%

    Edema NR

    Creatinine clear. + ???

    Cardiac comorb. significant < 1y?Edema NR

    Creatinine increase 66%/1%

    Weight loss NR

    Hypertension controlled

    Haematological +Stomatitis 25%/1%

    Liver toxicity # 50%/2%

    Cardiac toxicity 10%/2% (EVF)

    Liver +

    Lipids Proteinuria NR

    Thrombosis NR

    Perforation NR

    Coagulation +

  • NEJM 2007;356:125-134

  • O ll i l NSOverall survival= NS

    Progression-free Survival= S

  • Hypertension 17%/4%

    Hand /foot syndrom 30%/1%

    Trials’inclusion criteriaNausea /vomiting 20%/0%Diarrhea 43%/2%

    Rash 40%/1%

    Trials’inclusion criteriaand toxicities.

    Anemia 34%/3%

    Leucopenia /neutro NR

    Thrombocytopenia NR

    Median age 58 years (19-86)

    Age > 70 years ?y p

    Asthenia 35%/5%

    Pain 10%/0%

    Anorexia NR

    Perform. status ≥ 60 (100= 49%)

    Creatinine clear. ?

    Anorexia NR

    Hyperglycemia NR

    Lipids /lipase 12%/7%

    Edema NR

    Cardiac comorb. ?

    Hypertension ?Edema NRCreatinine increase NR

    Weight loss 10%/0%

    yp

    Haematological +Liver +Stomatitis NR

    Liver toxicity NR

    Cardiac toxicity 1 pt

    Liver +Lipids ?

    Proteinuria NR

    Thrombosis 1 pt

    Perforation NR

    Coagulation +

  • Overall and Progression-free survivalsare significantly improved.

    Temsirolimus > combination > IFN.

    Overall survival= S

  • Hypertension NR

    Hand /foot syndrom NR

    Nausea /vomiting 37%/2% Trials’inclusion criteriagDiarrhea 27% /1%

    Rash 47%/4%

    Anemia 45%/20%

    Trials inclusion criteriaand toxicities.

    Median age 59 years (23-86)

    A > 70 30% (> 65 )

    Anemia 45%/20%

    Leucopenia /neutro 6%/1%

    Thrombocytopenia 14%/1%

    A th i 51%/11 % Age > 70 years 30% (> 65 y)

    Perform. status ≥ 60

    Asthenia 51%/11 %

    Pain 28%/5%

    Anorexia 32%/3%

    Creatinine clear. # ≥ 60 (< 80= 82%)

    Cardiac comorb. ?

    Hyperglycemia 26%/11%

    Lipids /lipase 24%/1%

    Edema 27%/2%

    Hypertension ?

    Haematological +

    Creatinine increase 14%/3%

    Weight loss 19%/1%

    Stomatitis NR

    Liver +

    Lipids +

    Liver toxicity NR

    Cardiac toxicity NR

    Proteinuria NR

    Coagulation Proteinuria NR

    Thrombosis NR

    Perforation NR

  • Overall survival= NSOverall survival= NS

    Progression-freeSurvival= SSurvival S

  • Hypertension 26%/3%

    Hand /foot syndrom NR Trials’inclusion criteriaNausea /vomiting NRDiarrhea 20%/2%

    Rash NR

    and toxicities.

    Anemia NRLeucopenia /neutro 7%/4%

    Thrombocytopenia 6%/2% bleeding 33% Median age 61 years (18-81)y p g

    Asthenia 33%/12%

    Pain NRAnorexia NR

    Age > 70 years +

    Perform. status ≥ 70(70-80= 23%)

    Creatinine clear. +??Anorexia NRHyperglycemia NRLipids /lipase NREdema NR

    Cardiac comorb. ?

    Edema NRCreatinine increase NRWeight loss NR

    Hypertension Not controlled

    Haematological +Stomatitis NR

    Liver toxicity NR

    Cardiac toxicity 1 pt

    Liver +Lipids

    Proteinuria 18%/7%

    Thrombosis 3%/2%

    Perforation 5 (1%)

    Coagulation +

  • Summary: standard management.y g

    MSKCC Treatment optionsgroups

    First- line Second- line

    Standard Option Standard Option

    favorable Sunitinib Beva+IFNIL2 ?IL2 ?

    Sorafenib SunitinibT i

    Intermediate-i k

    Sunitinib Beva+IFN Temsiro-limus ?

    riskPoor- risk Temsiro- Sunitinib

    limus

  • Major treatment limits in elderlyMajor treatment limits in elderly.Sunitinib Sorafenib Temsirolimus Bevacizumab

    Median age 62 years (27-87) 58 years (19-86) 59 years (23-86) 61 years (18-81)Age > 70 years ? ? 30% (> 65 y) +Perform. status ≥ 80 (100= 62%) ≥ 60 (100= 49%) ≥ 60 ≥ 70(70-80= 23%)Creatinine clear. + ??? # ≥ 60 (< 80= 82%) +??

    Cardiac comorb. significant < 1y? ? ?

    Hypertension t ll d ? t ll dHypertension controlled ? controlled

    Haematological + + + +Liver + + + +Lipids +Coagulation + + +

  • Comparative side effects (1)Comparative side effects (1).Sunitinib Sorafenib Temsirolimus Bevacizumab

    Hypertension 24%/8% 17%/4% NR 26%/3%

    Hand /foot syndrom 20%/5% 30%/1% NR NRNausea /vomiting 44%/3% 20%/0% 37%/2% NRDiarrhea 53%/5% 43%/2% 27% /1% 20%/2%Diarrhea 53%/5% 43%/2% 27% /1% 20%/2%

    Rash 19%/1% 40%/1% 47%/4% NRAnemia 71%/3% 34%/3% 45%/20% NRLeucopenia /neutro 78%/5% NR 6%/1% 7%/4%

    Thrombocytopenia 65%/8% NR 14%/1% 6%/2% bleeding33%

    Asthenia 51%/7% 35%/5% 51%/11 % 33%/12%

    Pain 11%/1% 10%/0% 28%/5% NR

    = very frequent = frequent

  • Comparative side effects (2).Sunitinib Sorafenib Temsirolimus Bevacizumab

    p ( )

    Anorexia NR NR 32%/3% NR

    H l i NR NR 26%/11% NRHyperglycemia NR NR 26%/11% NR

    Lipids /lipase 30-40%/1% 12%/7% 24%/1% NR

    Edema NR NR 27%/2% NR

    Creatinine increase 66%/1% NR 14%/3% NR

    Weight loss NR 10%/0% 19%/1% NRStomatitis 25%/1% NR NR NRLiver toxicity # 50%/2% NR NR NRCardiac toxicity 10%/2% (EVF) 1 pt NR 1 ptProteinuria NR NR NR 18%/7%Proteinuria NR NR NR 18%/7%Thrombosis NR 1 pt NR 3%/2%Perforation NR NR NR 5 (1%)

  • Conclusions: difficult to treat elderly!!Conclusions: difficult to treat elderly!!• Few patients included in trials; no specificFew patients included in trials; no specific

    reports in elderly.• Inclusion criteria do not allow to include elderly• Inclusion criteria do not allow to include elderly

    patients: what behind?M i i i hi h i i ld l• Many toxicities which are important in elderly: HTA, CxVx, anorexia, fatigue /asthenia, hand /foot syndrom, anemia, neutropenia, renal toxicity.

    • The need for retrospective /prospective cohort studies.studies.