92
• Kim Miller 908 399 8386 • kmiller45 (IM) [email protected] Contact Information

Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) [email protected] Contact Information

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

• Kim Miller 908 399 8386

• kmiller45 (IM)

[email protected]

Contact Information

Page 2: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Unit 9 Final Essay

• The US correctional system can serve two specific functions in relation to criminal offenders. First, it can serve as a tool for punishing the offender and making the offender pay for his/her crimes. Second, it can serve as a means to rehabilitating the offender and preparing him/her for successful reentry into society.

• Write a 3-page paper that answers all 3 of the following questions:

• How does our correctional system punish offenders?• How does our correctional system rehabilitate offenders?• Which method is more effective in reducing crime? Punishment

or rehabilitation? Explain your choice.

Page 3: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Unit 9 Final Essay• You are required to use at least three (3) references for this paper.

You are required to access the Kaplan Library for at least one of your references. Another reference can be your text from this class, and the third reference can come from an acceptable online academic resource.

• Note: Wikipedia (and any of its related websites) is not an acceptable academic resource and may not be used for this paper.

• Be sure to list your sources on your reference page. • Your paper must follow this format:

– Page 1 – Cover page– Pages 2, 3 and 4 – Body of text– Page 5 – Reference page

Page 4: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Seminar Slides

• Solve the crime!

• What do you think?

• Multiple choice/true or false

Page 5: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Solve the Crime - The Black Dahlia

Homicide has always been

the most serious crime.

Today’s murderers still use timeless methods like knives and arsenic but they have also adopted modern ways to kill, such as radioactive substances and liquid explosives. Forensic science brings its own technology to crime scenes, but many infamous murders remain unsolved.

Page 6: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information
Page 7: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Solve the Crime - The Black Dahlia • Elizabeth Short was 22 years old when she was brutally

murdered in Los Angeles in the late 1940s. A woman with a troubled past and no fixed path through life, she was in L.A. visiting an old boyfriend and bouncing from one apartment to the next at the time of her death. She was found in a vacant lot, her body severed at the waist and her face slashed from the edge of her mouth toward the ears, creating a ghastly smile. Reporters nicknamed her the Black Dahlia after the 1946 noir film The Blue Dahlia. The murder sparked the largest LAPD investigation to that point, and the news media ran with the frenzy. Despite many theories put forth over the years, the case was never solved.

Page 8: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Solve the Crime - The Black Dahlia • She was a pretty, 22 year old who wore

dahlias in her hair. On 1/15/47 a mother walking with her child came upon Short’s mutilated body in Leimert Park, LA.

• Her torso was cut in half and her face slashed. The murder had placed her hands above her head with her elbows bent at right angles.

Page 9: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

The Investigation

• One of the investigators, George Wheeler, inspects evidence concerning the Black Dahlia case. Here he is brushing a note, sent anonymously, for fingerprints. They were taken and sent to the FBI in WDC to be matched with Short’s on a database. She was fingerprinted for a crime at a CA army base and arrested for underage drinking.

Page 10: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Timeline of her death• December 31, 1944: Short's playgirl lifestyle changes when she meets Matt Gordon, who stood

out from the testosterone horde, a major with the Flying Tigers.

• August 14, 1945: Short had finally stops worrying that Matt will be killed in combat. Instead she fantasizes about her upcoming nuptials. News reaches her that Matt has been killed.

• July 1946: Short returns to Southern California to be close to Joseph Gordon Fickling,

• November 13 to December 15, 1946: Short lives in a cramped two-bedroom apartment in Hollywood with eight other young women.

• Early January 1947: Short who was staying with a family is asked to leave. Manley comes to pick her up. He later tells a reporter that they stayed in a local motel and Short slept in her clothes.

• January 8, 1947: seven days before the murder, Fickling receives a letter from Short. In it, she tells him she is moving to Chicago, where she hopes to become a fashion model.

• January 9, 1947: Manley drives her to Los Angeles and helps her check her luggage at the bus station. She tells him she is going to Berkeley to stay with her sister, whom she is meeting at the Biltmore hotel downtown. Manley accompanies her into the hotel lobby, but takes leave of her at 6:30 p.m. to return to his family in San Diego.

• January 15, 1947: Short's body is discovered.

• January 25, 1947: Short's black patent leather purse and one of her black open-toed pumps is found in a dumpster at 1819th E. 25th street, several miles from the crime scene. Robert Manley identifies the items as hers.

Page 11: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Verdict of Coroner’s JurySTATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Los AngelesIn the Matter of the Inquisition upon the body of Elizabeth Short, Deceased,

Before BEN H. BROWN, Coroner.

We, the Jurors, summoned to appear before the Coroner of Los Angeles County at room 102, Hall of Justice, Los Angeles County, California, on the 22nd day of January A.D. 1947, to inquire into the cause of the death of Elizabeth Short, having been duly sworn according to law, and having made such inquisition and hearing the testimony adduced, upon our oaths, each and all do say that we find that the deceased was named Elizabeth Short, a female, single, native of Mass., aged about 22 years, and that she came to her death found on the 15th day of January, 1947 at Norton St. Between 39th and Coliseum Drive, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California, and that this death was caused by hemorrhage and shock due to concussion of the brain and lacerations of face; and from the testimony introduced we find said injuries to have been inflicted on the deceased by some person or persons unknown at this time to this jury and at some location unknown to this jury; and we find this to be a homicide and recommend that every effort be made to apprehend the perpetrator or perpetrators responsible therefor, all of which we duly certify by this inquisition in writing, by us signed this 22nd day of January, 1947.

Page 12: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Taunting Letters

• Taunting letters sent from the killer to the LA Examiner.

Page 13: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

• At one point during the investigation, an envelope was sent to the police department, and media called it the 'Clue Letter'. Since this contained some personal effects of the Black Dahlia, the police were very interested in who sent it. The sender was never found.

Page 14: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

SuspectsRobert Manley - the last person seen with the victim alive. He helped her check in her suitcase at a bus station. He had mental problems. He passed a polygraph test.

Mark Hansen – Nightclub owner and a former jealous boyfriend of Shorts. Whereabouts at time of murder: Los Angeles. History of violence: None recorded, no criminal record.Stress factors at time of murder: Long-term separation from wife but continued with joint real estate deals; womanizer; problems with disenchanted women. Link to the victim: Aspiring actresses often stayed in his large home located behind the Florentine Gardens. The victim was a guest in suspect's home periodically between August 1946 and October 1946. Although he denied being interested in Elizabeth Short, witness claimed suspect tried to get Elizabeth Short into bed. Short demurred and told him she was a virgin, so he gave up. Suspect bought clothes and hats for her. Elizabeth Short called him from San Diego on January 8 or 9. Link to the signature and MO of perpetrator: An old, brown address book belonging to suspect was included in packet mailed by the killer.

Page 15: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Suspects• Walter Bayley – a surgeon whose house was one block from where the body

was found. His daughter was a friend of Short’s sister. An autopsy after his death in 1948 showed he was suffering from a degenerative brain disease. His wife said that Bayley’s mistress had known a terrible secret about him.

• Dr. George Hodel – His son, an LA homicide detective was certain his father was the murderer. In a 2003 book, Hodel found two pictures in his father’s photo album of a young woman who looked like Short. Letters sent by the killer to the police confirmed that the handwriting matched that of his father.

• Orson Welles – the famous actor was under suspicion because of his temper and he ate in the same restaurant as Short.

• Woody Guthrie, - famous singer was a suspect because he had sent sexually explicit letters to a woman in California.

Page 16: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Do you know?• What court would this case be tried in? State or Federal?

• Would the Supreme Court of the U.S. hear this case without voting? How many votes are needed to hear a case?

• Was Manley or any of the other suspects read Miranda rights?

• What type of attorney would prosecute the Dahlia matter?

• What type of attorney would defend Manley or the other suspects?

• If Manley or any suspect cannot afford an attorney what amendment guarantees him one? What case guarantees this?

• If Manley or any suspect does not agree with the verdict, what can he do and how many is he allowed?

• The accused is called the _______? And have a right to have their case heard before a jury of their ________?

• If Manley, etc. were indigent, do they have to accept counsel? Can they represent themselves?

Page 17: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Lingering Doubts• Was this tragic murder simply the result of a young woman

being in the wrong place at the wrong time and encountering a homicidal predator?

• Would someone she knew sent taunting letters to the police?

• Does such a frenzied attack suggest a person with mental problems like Bayler or Manley? Since Bayley was a surgeon living close by, why didn’t detectives investigative him?

• Should Dr. George Hodel be c considered the chief suspect since his own son believed he murdered Short?

• Does the jealousy of Short's boyfriend provide the clearest motive?

Page 18: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information
Page 19: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

59) Cases begin in courts with ________ jurisdiction.A) prosecutorial

B) appellate

C) original

D) limited

Page 20: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

64) A court of last resort has ________ jurisdiction.A) appellateB) noC) originalD) unlimited

Page 21: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

• What constitutes a jury of one’s peers? Who are your peers? If you were to face trial on a criminal charge, would you want your peers on the jury? Explain

Page 22: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

What do you think?• In what ways might pretrial news coverage

be damaging to the objective outcome of a criminal trial?

• Given the emphasis that our society places on freedom of the press and freedom of speech, do you believe that judges should be allowed to issue gag rules restricting the ability of trial participants to discuss a case outside of court?

Page 23: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

• Do you think video cameras should be permitted in criminal courtrooms? Why or why not?

Page 24: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Do you know?

35) All of the following are true statements about the United States Supreme Court except:

A) The Supreme Court has the power of judicial review.

B) Nine justices serve on the Court.

C) Once confirmed, a justice serves an eight-year term.

D) The Supreme Court is the highest court in the federal court system.

Page 25: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Federal Court Questions

38) Which of the following federal offices is responsible for administering the federal court system?

A) Bureau of Court Oversight

B) U.S. Attorney's Office

C) General Accounting Office

D) Administrative Office of the United States Courts

Page 26: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Federal Court Questions39) There is/are ________ district court(s) in the federal court system.

A) 94

B) 50

C) 14

D) 1

40) In which court would a felony trial be held in the federal court system?

A) United States Magistrates Court

B) District Court

C) United States Supreme Court

D) Court of Appeals

41) How many regional intermediate appellate courts are there in the federal system?

A) 12

B) 50

C) 1

D) 6

Page 27: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Federal Court Questions44) The dual-court system consists of:

A) drug and gun courts.

B) felony and misdemeanor courts.

C) state and federal courts.

D) trial and appellate courts.

46) The federal court system is comprised of the U.S. ________ courts, U.S. courts of appeals, and the U.S. Supreme Court.

A) venue

B) mediation

C) circuit

D) district

47) States that followed the federal court model have how many tiers?

A) five

B) two

C) three

D) four

Page 28: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

True or False

1) Prosecutors are required to assist the defense in building its case by making available any evidence in their possession.

2) A study in the state of New York found that defendants considered community courts to be less fair than traditional courts.

3) A lay witness is allowed to offer his or her opinion in court.

4) All judges in America are chosen by election.

5) A prosecutor is absolutely immune from civil liability when giving legal advice to the police and initiating a prosecution against a suspect.

6) In 2005 the American Bar Association issued a set of 19 principles to guide jury reform. The principles are aimed at preventing jurors from accepting bribes.

7) Most defendants are represented by a private attorney through all stages of the court process.

8) Suspects have the constitutional right to represent themselves.

Page 29: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

True or False

9) An indigent suspect charged with an offense for which he or she could receive a sentence of imprisonment has the constitutional right to be represented by counsel.

10) By law and judicial precedent, television cameras are permitted in state and federal courtrooms, including the United States Supreme Court.

11) The Missouri plan for judicial selection includes elements of judicial selection by election and appointment.

12) During the Middle Ages victims played a central role in trial and sentencing proceedings.

13) The American court system has three types of courts: federal, state and local.

14) An appeal by a defendant convicted in a trial court, results in a new trial in the appellate court.

15) In some instances, state courts will try a case involving federal law.

Page 30: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Multiple Choice21) All of the following are considered professionals in the courtroom work group except the:

A) defense attorney.

B) victim.

C) prosecuting attorney.

D) judge.

22) The U.S. Supreme Court case of U.S. v. Bagley compels the prosecution to disclose any evidence that the ________ requests.

A) defense

B) police

C) judge

D) press

23) Which statement is false regarding the role of the judge in the courtroom work group?

A) The judge holds ultimate authority in ruling on matters of law.

B) The judge is responsible for presenting the state's case against the defendant.

C) The primary duty of a judge is to ensure justice.

D) If a guilty verdict has been returned, the judge is responsible for imposing a sentence.

24) Which work group member has the responsibility of demonstrating to a jury that a defendant is guilty

beyond a reasonable doubt?

A) the prosecutor

B) the judge

C) the defense attorney

D) the bailiff

Page 31: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Short Answer.

77) The three-tiered structure of the ________ court system is comprised of U.S. District Courts, U.S. courts of appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court.

78) ________ is the territory, subject matter, or people over which a court or other justice agency may exercise lawful authority.

79) If a murder is committed in Morgan County the prosecution of that case must begin in the Morgan County Circuit Court. The Morgan County Circuit Court has ________ jurisdiction.

80) The lawful authority of a court to review a decision made by a lower court is known as ________ jurisdiction.

81) Trial de novo literally means a ________ trial.

82) The United States Supreme Court is a "court of ________ resort".

83) A coordinator who assists with case-flow management, operating funds, budgeting, and the management of the court docket is the state court ________.

Page 32: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Short Answer.84) An informal hearing place designed to mediate interpersonal

disputes without resorting to the more formal arrangements of a criminal trial court is a ________ center.

85) A low-level court that focuses on quality-of-life crimes that erode a neighborhood's morale and emphasizes problem solving rather than punishment is known as a ________ court.

86) After Bob kills Ray, the prosecutor decides to charge Bob with voluntary manslaughter instead of first degree murder. This is an example of prosecutorial ________.

87) A victim-________ program offers services to victims of crime in the areas of crisis intervention and follow-up counseling and that helps victims secure their rights under the law.

88) ________ evidence is any information having a tendency to clear a person of guilt or blame.

Page 33: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Short Answer.84) An informal hearing place designed to mediate interpersonal

disputes without resorting to the more formal arrangements of a criminal trial court is a ________ center.

85) A low-level court that focuses on quality-of-life crimes that erode a neighborhood's morale and emphasizes problem solving rather than punishment is known as a ________ court.

86) After Bob kills Ray, the prosecutor decides to charge Bob with voluntary manslaughter instead of first degree murder. This is an example of prosecutorial ________.

87) A victim-________ program offers services to victims of crime in the areas of crisis intervention and follow-up counseling and that helps victims secure their rights under the law.

88) ________ evidence is any information having a tendency to clear a person of guilt or blame.

Page 34: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Dispute Resolution Centers

• Offer a way to resolve disputes without a formal hearing

• Over 200 programs nationwide

• Frequently staffed by volunteers

• May or may not be run by the courts

• Central feature of restorative justice

Page 35: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

43) Ray had his wallet stolen. When the man who stole his wallet was caught, Ray opted to resolve the disagreement informally. The disposition of his case was probably heard at a:

A) alternative justice center.

B) criminal justice center.

C) dispute-resolution center.

D) victim-assistance center.

Page 36: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

U.S. Supreme Court

• The U.S. Supreme Court consists of nine justices:– Eight Associate Justices– One Chief Justice

• Justices are nominated by the President, confirmed by the Senate, and serve for life.

Page 37: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Jurisdiction of the U.S. Supreme Court

• Original jurisdiction– Limited– Reserved for disputes between states

and some cases of attorney disbarment

• Appellate jurisdiction – Reviews the decisions from U.S. Courts

of Appeals and state supreme courts

Page 38: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Supreme Court of the U.S.

One First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20543 Phone: 202-479-3211

Members:Chief Justice of the United States

Who?

Associate Justices

Who are they?

Page 39: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Supreme Court of the U.S.

One First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20543 Phone: 202-479-3211

Members:Chief Justice of the United StatesJOHN G. ROBERTS, JR.

Associate JusticesANTONIN SCALIAANTHONY M. KENNEDYCLARENCE THOMASRUTH BADER GINSBURGSTEPHEN G. BREYERSAMUEL A. ALITO, JR.SONIA SOTOMAYORELENA KAGAN

Page 40: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

U.S. Supreme Court: Appeals

• Of 5,000 annual requests for review, only about 200 are heard.– ????? justices must vote in favor of a hearing for a

case to be heard.• Usually the Court only reviews cases that

involve a substantial federal question.• The Court issues a writ of certiorari to a lower

court.• The Court reviews transcripts and hears brief

oral arguments.

Page 41: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

U.S. Supreme Court - Tradition

• For all of the changes in its history, the Supreme Court has retained so many traditions that it is in many respects the same institution that first met in 1790, prompting one legal historian to call it, "the first Court still sitting.“

• As is customary in American courts, the nine Justices are seated by seniority on the Bench. The Chief Justice occupies the center chair; the senior Associate Justice sits to his right, the second senior to his left, and so on, alternating right and left by seniority.

• Since at least 1800, it has been traditional for Justices to wear black robes while in Court. Chief Justice Jay, and apparently his colleagues, lent a colorful air to the earlier sessions by wearing robes with a red facing, somewhat like those worn by early colonial and English judges. The Jay robe of black and salmon is now in the possession of the Smithsonian Institution.

Page 42: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

U.S. Supreme Court - Tradition

• Quill pens have remained part of the Courtroom scene. White quills are placed on counsel tables each day that the Court sits, as was done at the earliest sessions of the Court. The "Conference handshake" has been a tradition since the days of Chief Justice Melville W. Fuller in the late 19th century. When the Justices assemble to go on the Bench each day and at the beginning of the private Conferences at which they discuss decisions, each Justice shakes hands with each of the other eight. Chief Justice Fuller instituted the practice as a reminder that differences of opinion on the Court did not preclude overall harmony of purpose.

Page 43: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

U.S. Supreme Court - Tradition

• The Supreme Court has a traditional seal, which is similar to the Great Seal of the United States, but which has a single star beneath the eagle's claws— symbolizing the Constitution’s creation of "one Supreme Court." The Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States is kept in the custody of the Clerk of the Court and is stamped on official papers, such as certificates given to attorneys newly admitted to practice before the Supreme Court. The seal now used is the fifth in the Court’s history.

Page 44: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Jurisdiction

• The jurisdiction of a court refers to those cases in which it may exercise lawful authority– Determined by statute or constitution

Page 45: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

A Typical State Court System

Page 46: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

State Trial Courts: Courts of Limited Jurisdiction

• Authorized to hear:– Misdemeanors, family disputes, traffic

violations, and small claims– Rarely hold jury trials– Do not maintain records of proceedings

(just charge, plea, finding, and sentence)– Less formal than higher courts

Page 47: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

State Trial Courts: Courts of General Jurisdiction

• Also called: high courts, circuit courts, or superior courts.

• Formal courts that make full use of juries, witnesses, prosecutors, defense attorneys

• Authorized to hear:– Any criminal case– Lower court appeals

• Trial de novo

Page 48: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Adversarial Process

• …pits the interests of the state, represented by prosecutors, against the accused, represented by defense counsel, in a process constrained by procedural rules specified in law and by tradition.

Page 49: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

State Appellate Courts

• 39 states have intermediate and high-level appellate courts (courts of last resorts).

• All states have supreme courts.

Page 50: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

The Federal Court System

• Established by the U.S. Constitution– Article III, Section 1

• “One Supreme Court, and such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.”

Page 51: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Federal Court System

Page 52: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Herrera v. Collins (1993)

• Evidence of innocence is no reason for a federal court to order a new trial if constitutional grounds are lacking.• “Where a defendant has been afforded a fair trial

and convicted of the offense for which he was charged, the constitutional presumption of innocence disappears.”

Page 53: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Jurisdiction of Federal Courts

• Article III, Section 2• Federal courts have jurisdiction over

cases arising under the Constitution, federal law, and treaties.

• Federal courts settle disputes between states and have jurisdiction in cases where one of the parties is a state.

Page 54: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Structure of Federal Court System

• Three Levels of Courts– U.S. Supreme Court– U.S. Courts of Appeals– U.S. District Courts

Page 55: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

U.S. District Courts

• There are 94 judicial districts– At least one district court per state– District courts in Puerto Rico, the District of

Columbia, and other U.S. Territories

• The trial courts of the federal system• Original jurisdiction over all cases

involving alleged violations of federal statutes

Page 56: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

District Court Judges• There are 650 district court judges.

– Appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate

– Serve for life

• District court judges are assisted by magistrate judges, who:– Conduct arraignments – Set bail – Issue warrants– Try minor offenders

Page 57: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

U.S. Courts of Appeal: Circuit Courts

• There are 13 U.S. Courts of Appeals– The 94 judicial districts are organized into 12

regions (circuits), each with one Circuit Court. – The Federal Circuit has one U.S. Court of

Appeals.– 167 appeals court judges – Review cases on appeal from U. S. district

courts and trial-level federal courts

Page 58: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal

FIGURE 9–3 Geographic boundaries of the U.S. courts of appeals.

Page 59: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

U.S. Courts of Appeal: Circuit Courts

• Have mandatory jurisdiction over decisions of appealed district court cases

• Appeals are classified as:– Frivolous– Ritualistic– Nonconsensual

• The number of federal criminal appeals reached record high levels in 2005.

Page 60: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Appeals: The Results

• Most convictions are confirmed.

• Some decisions are reversed and cases remanded.

• Recourse may be to a state supreme court.

• Generally, state supreme court is the court of last resort.

Page 61: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Appeals: Moving to the Federal System

• Cases can be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court if they are based on a claimed violation of the defendant’s rights as guaranteed under federal law or the U. S. Constitution.

Page 62: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Community Courts

• Low level courts focusing on quality-of-life crimes that erode neighborhood morale

• Emphasize problem solving rather than punishment

• Build on restorative principles such as community service and restitution

Page 63: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

85) A low-level court that focuses on quality-of-life crimes that erode a neighborhood's morale and emphasizes problem solving rather than punishment is known as a ________ court.

Page 64: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Jurisdiction of the U.S. Supreme Court

• Original jurisdiction– Limited– Reserved for disputes between states

and some cases of attorney disbarment

• Appellate jurisdiction – Reviews the decisions from U.S. Courts

of Appeals and state supreme courts

Page 65: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Writ of Certiorari

• … a writ issued from an appellate court for the purpose of obtaining from a lower court the record of its proceedings in a particular case.

Page 66: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Judicial Review

• … the power of a court to review actions and decisions made by other agencies of government.

• It is probably the U.S. Supreme Court’s greatest power.

• Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Page 67: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Opinions of the Court

• Supreme Court decisions are rarely unanimous

• Types of opinions:

• Majority—Justices agree in outcome and reasoning. This is the opinion of the court.

• Concurring—Agree with outcome, but for different reasons.

• Dissenting—Disagree with outcome.

Page 68: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Judicial Selection

• Federal Judges• Nominated by

President• Confirmed by

senate

• State Judges• Popular election• Gubernatorial

appointment• Missouri Plan

(combines appointment and election)

Page 69: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Judges: Qualifications

• At general and appellate levels:– Be a member of the state bar– Be a licensed attorney– Hold a law degree (in most states)– Attend professional training

• In some states, lower court judges may be elected without educational or other professional requirements.

Page 70: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Prosecutor’s Responsibilities

• Present the state’s case against the defendant• State has the burden of proof

• Supervise staff of assistant district attorneys

• Serve as quasi-legal advisor to police• Files appeals on behalf of the state• Makes presentations to parole boards

Page 71: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Prosecutorial Discretion

• Prosecutor decides:• Whether or not to charge someone with a crime• Which charges are to be filed against the defendant• Whether multiple charges should be filed together

or separately• When to schedule cases for trial• Whether or not to accept a negotiated plea• What evidence to present, including witnesses• What sentencing recommendations to make

Page 72: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Case Law

• Brady v. Maryland (1963) • U. S. v. Bagley (1985)• Imbler v. Patchman (1976)• Burns v. Reed (1991)

Page 73: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Abuse of Discretion• Prosecutors may abuse their discretion

by…– Not prosecuting friends – Accepting guilty pleas or reduced charges for

personal consideration – Overzealous prosecution to gain visibility for

possible reelection – Scheduling activities to make life difficult for

defendants, in an attempt to put pressure on them to plead guilty Discrimination against minorities

Page 74: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Defense Counsel

• Represents the accused• Participates in plea negotiations• Prepares a defense• Calls witnesses• Refutes case presented by prosecutor• Presents arguments at time of sentencing• Files appeals

Page 75: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Three Major Categories of Defense Counsel

1. Private attorney(retainedcounsel)

• Have their own legal practices or work for law firms

• Fees can be high

2. Court-assignedcounsel(assignedcounsel)

• Lawyers drawn from a roster of all practicing attorney

• Fees are paid at a rate set by the government

3. Public defender • Relies on full-time salaried government staff

Page 76: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Criminal Defense of the Poor

• The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees criminal defendants the effective assistance of counsel.

• Defendants who are unable to pay for private defense attorneys will receive adequate representation at all stages of criminal justice processing.

Page 77: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Case Law

• Powell v. Alabama (1932)• Alabama v. Shelton (2002)• Johnson v. Zerbst (1938)• Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)• Argersinger v. Hamlin (1972)• In re Gault (1967)

Page 78: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Court-Assigned Counsel

• Fee paid based on state rate (most widely used).

• Fee is usually low, raising questions about the level of commitment of defense attorneys.

• Roster of local attorneys who are willing to take cases under established fees.

Page 79: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Public Defender Program

• Uses full-time salaried attorneys.

• 28% of counties nationwide use this system exclusively.

• 64% of counties nationwide use public defenders as part of their system.

Page 80: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Contract Attorneys

• Local attorneys are maintained on contract to handle all cases.

• This is the least widely used form of indigent defense.

Page 81: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Waiving the Right to an Attorney

• 1% of federally charged defendants and 3% of state level defendants represent themselves.

• Faretta v. California (1975)• Indigents are not required to accept

counsel. They may waive their right and represent themselves.

Page 82: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Appeals and Indigent Defense

• State-supported indigent defense systems may also be called on to provide representation during appeals.

• If an attorney believes that such an appeal would be frivolous, he or she can request to be withdrawn from the case.

Page 83: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Expert Witness

• Expert witnesses have special knowledge and skills in an established profession or technical area. Usually, this person is paid to testify.

• Unlike lay witnesses, they may express opinions and draw conclusions in their testimony.

Page 84: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Lay Witness

• Non-expert witnesses are called lay witnesses. They may be:• Eye witness• Character witness• Victim

• Lay witnesses are subpoenaed to testify to that which they have direct knowledge of.

Page 85: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Jurors

• Article III of the U.S. Constitution• “trial of all crimes…shall be by jury”• States determine the number of jurors.

Most use 12, plus 2 alternates. • Jury duty…a civic responsibility

Page 86: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Peer Juries

• Defendants have the right to have their cases heard before a jury of their peers.

• Peer juries are those composed of a representative cross section of the community.

Page 87: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Jury Reform

• In 2005, the American Bar Association released a set of 19 principles intended to guide jury reform…to improve treatment of jurors and modernize the system.

Page 88: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

The Defendant

• Generally, they must be present at trial.• Defendants exercise choice in:

• Selecting and retaining counsel• Planning a defense strategy with counsel• Deciding what information to provide

counsel• Deciding what to plea• Deciding whether or not to testify• Determining whether or not to file an appeal

Page 89: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Spectators and the Press

• May be present at trial; with more at higher-profile cases

• The right of reporters to be there is supported by the Sixth Amendment’s requirement of a public trial.

• Most courts allow cameras in the courtroom…for television coverage.

Page 90: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

State Court Systems Today

• Many differences among state courts.

• Most use the three-tiered structure.– Trial courts of limited jurisdiction– Trial courts of general jurisdiction– Appellate courts

• The court reform movement continues today, seeking to simplify and unify court structures.

Page 91: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Appeals

• Appeals are requests by a defendant to a higher court asking it to review the actions of a lower court.

• Some cases (involving death penalty or life sentences) are automatically appealed.

• Appellate court reviews transcripts from lower trial courts and may allow both sides to make oral arguments.

Page 92: Kim Miller 908 399 8386 kmiller45 (IM) kmiller2@kaplan.edu Contact Information

Right to Appeal

• The Constitution guarantees a right to appeal.

• A defendant’s right to appeal, however, has been interpreted to mean the right to one appeal.

• Therefore, the U.S. Supreme Court does not hear every appeal by defendants dissatisfied with the decision of a federal appeals court.