KIDD CREEK MINES LTD. GEOPHYSICAL REPORT ON …€¦ · DEL [Project NO -- 75 Oott 027 12/82 SKUNK CREEK l GRID RUNNING GHOST GRID MARINER ENERGY MINERALS Ltd Option CONSOLIDATED

41018NE8034 2 .5403 CUNNINGHAM 010

KIDD CREEK MINES LTD.

GEOPHYSICAL REPORT ON CUNNINGHAM 31

RUNNING GHOST LAKE, PETER LAKE, SKUNK CREEK

AND

DUCK POND GRIDS

CUNNINGHAM BASE METALS PROJECT #75

N.T.S.: 41-0-10

JANUARY, 1983 MICHAEL W. ZANG

ir to a b 1983

MINING LANDS SECTION

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Geophysical surveys consisting of proton precession

magnetometer, horizontal loop electromagnetic and very low

frequency electromagnetic traverses were conducted over four

properties in Cunningham Township.

Extremely strong electromagnetic anomalies were

detected in all four properties, three of which contain

magnetite and sulphide iron formations.

Based on the geophysical results, four drill holes have

been planned to test the conductors on the Skunk Creek and

Duck Pond Properties (Figures 2 and 3), Also a follow up

horizontal loop survey is recommended to detail the

conductors on the Peter Lake Grid and to complete the EM

coverage on the remaining three properties.

41018NEe034 2.5483 CUNNINGHAM

TABLE OF CONTENTS010C

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

INTRODUCTION

Location and Access

Previous Work

l

l

3

GENERAL GEOLOGY

PROPERTY GEOLOGY

SURVEY DETAILS

SURVEY RESULTS 10

REFERENCES

LIST OF FIGURES

Fiqure l General map showing location of Cunningham 31; 1:50,000

Figure 2 HEM Anomaly and Proposed Drilling in the Skunk Creek

Area; 1:5,000

Figure 3 HEM Anomalies and Proposed Drilling in the Duck Pond

Area; 1:5,000

Figure 4 HEM Survey Results, Duck Pond Grid; 444Hz, 1:2,000

Figure 5 HEM Survey Results, Duck Pond Grid; 1777Hz, 1:2,000

Figure 6 Magnetometer Survey Results, Duck Pond Grid; 1:2,000

Figure 7 VLF Survey Results, Duck Pond Grid; 1:2,000

Figure 8 HEM Survey Results, Skunk Creek Grid; 444Hz, 1:2,000

Figure 9 HEM Survey Results, Skunk Creek Grid; 1777Hz, 1:2,000

Figure 10 Magnetometer Survey Results, Skunk Creek Grid;

1:2,000

Figure 11 VLF Survey Results, Skunk Creek Grid; 1:2,000

Figure 12 HEM Survey Results, Peter Lake Grid; 444Hz; 1:2,000

Figure 13 HEM Survey Results, Peter Lake Grid; 1777Hz;

1:2,000

Figure 14 Magnetometer Survey Results, Peter Lake Grid; 1:2,000

Figure 15 VLF Survey Results, Peter Lake Grid; 1:2,000

Figure 16 HEM Survey Results, Running Ghost Lake Grid; 444Hz,

1:2,000

Figure 17 HRM Survey Results, Running Ghost Lake Grid; 1777Hz,

1:2,000

Figure 18 Magnetometer Survey Results, Running Ghost Lake Grid;

1:2,000

Figure 19 VLF Survey Results, Running Ghost Lake Grid; 1:2,000

INTRODUCTION

Proton precession magnetometer, horizontal loop

electromagnetic and very low frequency (VLF)

electromagnetic surveys were conducted on four properties in

the western and eastern parts of Cunningham Township between

September 15 - 29, and October 13 - 21, 1982. The field work

completed on approximately 91 kilometres of grid is the

subject of this report.

Location and Access;

The properties are located and described as follows

(F ig ure l):

Running Ghost Lake Grid (southern Cunningham/Greenlaw

Township boundary)

- 16 unpatented claims P 641172 to P 641187 (inclusive)

Peter Lake Grid (west-central Cunningham Township)

- 4 leased claims S 116466 to S 116469 (inclusive)


Skunk Creek Grid (east-central Cunningham Township)

KIDD CREEK MINES LTD.Exploration Division Timmins , ONTARIOFigure

CUNNINGHAM TOWNSHIP CUNNINGHAM 31

GRID LOCATIONS

Drown ! DEL [Project NO -- 7 5 Oott 027 12/82

SKUNK CREEK l GRID

RUNNING GHOST GRID

MARINER ENERGY MINERALS Ltd

Option

CONSOLIDATEDSHUNSBY( HW Rf SOURCESBlamey

Y


P 636232, P 636485, P 636486

P 641676 to P 641679 (inclusive)

and P 642065

Duck Pond Grid (adjoins Skunk Creek Grid to the South)


Access to the westernmost groups is most easily

attained by float equipped, fixed-wing aircraft from Ivanhoe

Lake, 61 kilometres to the no-th. In addition, the Running

Ghost and Peter Lake Grids are connected by an old wagon

road which originates approximately 20 kilometres to the

south in Sultan.

A 4-wheel drive access road from Garnet Lake, 12

kilometres to the east, to the Shunsby base metals prospect

in central Cunningham Township, provides access to the Skunk

Creek and Duck Pond Grids.

Previous Work; FRANK R. PLOEGER

Prospecting of the Cunningham Township area in the

early 19 00's concentrated on the cherty iron formation as

possible hosts of iron ore deposits. Emphasis was then

switched to gold and finally base metals exploration with

the discovery of zinc, lead and copper mineralization in the

sedimentary horizons.

The majority of work to date has been conducted on the

M.W. Resources Ltd. property, formerly named Shunsby Gold

Mines Limited and Consolidated Shunsby Mines Limited, which

lies in the central -portion of the Township. In addition to

approximately 150 diamond drill holes aggregating 55,529

feet (16925 m, Siragusa, 1980) extensive trenching and

stripping and geological, geophysical and geochemical

surveys have been conducted on the property. This work

outlined 3 mineralized zones, the largest of which has been

traced for 350 feet (105 m) along strike and 1000 feet (300

m) down dip - dips range between 20 and 30 west - and

which averages 30 feet (9 m) in width. The mineralization

occurs as bands, stringers and veins of sulphides in a

sedimentary unit comprised of brecciated chert-magnetite

iron formation, argillite, graphitic phyllite and sericite

schist. The largest of these zones contains drill indicated

reserves of 310,095 tons (Thurston et al, 1977) grading 1.2

percent copper, 1.3 percent zinc and significant lead,

silver and cadmium. Previous work on, and in the vicinity of

the Kidd Creek claim groups has shown that they are

underlain by sedimentary horizons similar to those occurring

on the M.W. Resources property.

In 1959-60, the Anaconda Company (Canada) Limited

carried out geological, geophysical and diamond drilling

programs on a claim group coincident with the Running Ghost

Lake Grid. No assays were reported, however, all drill holes

intersected banded magnetite and sulphide iron formation.

Extensive trenching and test-pitting was evident in the

area south of Peter Lake. Drilling by R. A. MacGregor in

1965, outlined small continuous sulphide lenses of up to 5%

combined zinc/lead over widths of almost 6 m. A

self-potential survey by Geophysical Engineering Services

Limited in 1958, demonstrated that conductive sediments

underly the area immediately south of Peter Lake.

The stratigraphic sequence of the M. W. Resources

property appears to strike southeasterly onto the adjoining

Skunk Creek and Duck Pond Grids. In 1954, The American Metal

Company Limited carried out geological and geophysical

surveys and a limited amount of diamond drilling in an area

covering the north part of the Duck Pond Grid. Their surveys

and drilling located "limited sulphide mineralization"

associated with shear zones and the contact between iron

formation and greenstone.

Geophysical surveys and diamond drilling by Dome

Exploration (Canada) Limited in 1971 and 1973, concentrated

on outlining and testing the ultramafics which intrude the

sedimentary-volcanic sequence on the south part of the Duck

Pond Grid. The sediments intersected by the drilling

comprised variably mineralized banded siliceous iron

formation, tuff and argillite.

Previous government surveys covering the Cunningham

Township area include regional mapping by V.B. Meen (1942),

detailed township mapping by G. M. Siragusa (1980) and

airborne electromagnetic and magnetic surveys by the Ontario

Geological Survey (1982). The airborne surveys showed up

numerous conductors on all the claim groups.

GENERAL GEOLOGY FRANK R. PLOEGER

Cunningham Township is underlain by a thick sequence of

mafic to intermediate tuffs, pillowed and massive flows and

related intrusive equivalents. Interbedded with this

sequence are continuous lenses of siliceous magnetite and

subordinate sulphide iron formation with associated

tuffaceous and argillaceous sediments and felsic tuff,

lapilli tuff and agglomerate. Discontinuous sill-like bodies

of peridotite and pyroxenite cut the sequence locally. In

the southwest corner of Cunningham Township, a plug of

biotite-quartz monzonite and related quartz-feldspar

porphyry dikes intrude the volcano-sedimentary pile causing

local flattening of dips and changes in the strike of the

units. North-South trending diabase dikes which are probably

of the Matachewan type, represent the latest phase of

intrusive activity in the township.

The Isaiah Creek fault has been shown by G.M. Siragusa

to cut the granitic plug with an indicated left lateral

displacement of approximately 2COO m.

PROPERTY GEOLOGY FRANK R. PLOEGER

The Running Ghost Lake Grid is underlain mainly by a

succession of mafic to intermediate tuffs and flows which

separate, and to a lesser extent are interbedded with, two

sedimentary horizons. The lowermost horizon, which outcrops

east of the lake, comprises a shallow westward-dipping,

north-south-striking sequence of chert, greywacke, argillite

and magnetite with subordinate sulphide iron formation.

Diamond drill holes into the poorly-exposed, upper

sedimentary unit intersected graphitic argillite and impure

sediments mineralized with bands and stringers of

pyrrhotite.

The volcanic-sedimentary pile is intruded by gabbroic,

dioritic and ultramafic sills and by the granitic plug on

the east boundary.

Geologically, the Peter Lake Grid may be divided into

3 sections. The northern and southern thirds of the property

are underlain by mafic and intermediate tuff, massive and

pillowed flows, felsic pyroclastics and mafic intrusive

rocks.

Well fractured siliceous iron formation and associated

argillite, mafic and felsic tuff and sulphide iron formation

constitute the central sedimentary section of the property.

Previous work in fractured and quartz-veined chert and mafic

volcanics, approximately 150 m south of the east end of

Peter Lake, outlined a 200 m long zinc-lead-rich zone which

assayed up to 4.2% zinc and 1.01 lead over 5.6 m.

A small tongue of the granitic plug outcrops in the

southeast corner of the property.

The Skunk Creek grid is almost entirely underlain by

north to northwest-striking mafic to intermediate pillowed

and massive flows intruded by concordant to subconcordant

gabbroic sills. Many of the sills may in fact be massive

flows. Several airborne EM anomalies occur at the contact

between a wide gabbroic sill and the intruded mafic flows

northeast of Skunk Creek.

The extrusive/intrusive mafic package of the Skunk

Creek Grid continues southward onto the adjoining Duck Pond

Grid. Overlying this package is a central sedimentary

horizon flanked by felsic pyroclastic units. The sediments

comprise a northwest-striking, southwest-dipping sequence of

fragmented chert, argillite, mafic and felsic tuff and

banded magnetitie and sulphide facies of iron formation

similar to that at Peter Lake. Mineralization logged in

previous drilling and observed in a surface showing includes

banded pyrrhotite and pyrite with minor chalcopyrite and

sphalerite; pyrite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite and galena also

occur in veins and fracture-fillings. East-west-trending

mafic and ultramafic sills intrude the volcanic-sedimentary

sequence.

SURVEY DETAILS

On all four Cunningham grids, crosslines were cut at

100 metre intervals with stations established every 20

metres.

Magnetic readings were taken with a Geometrics G816

proton precession magnetometer. This instrument measures the

earth's total magnetic field to an accuracy of ^ l gamma.

Base stations were established at the most convenient tie in

points due to the number of rivers and lakes on the grids. A

total of 3990 readings were taken along 80 kilometres of

line.

The horizontal loop survey was carried out with an Apex

Parametrics MaxMin II using a coil separation of 80 metres.

Readings were taken every 20 metres at frequencies of 444Hz

and 1777Hz. A total of 3750 readings were taken along 75

kilometres of line.

Very low frequency (VLF) readings were taken with a

Crone Radem EM receiver. This instrument measures the dip

10

angle of the magnetic field component in degrees with an

accuracy of i 1/2 degree. The transmitting stations used in

the surveys were:

Duck Pond Grid

Skunk Creek Grid

Peter Lake Grid

Running Ghost

Lake Grid

Freq.

Seattle, Washington 24.8 KHz

Cutler, Main 17.8 KHz

Cutler, Main 17.8 KHz

Annapolis, Maryland 21.4 KHz

A total of 3990 readings were taken along 80 kilometres of

line.

SURVEY RESULTS

Duck Pond Grid

The Duck Pond Grid adjoins the south end of the Skunk

Creek Property in east-central Cunningham Township. The

property is geophysically dominated by five major northwest

trending horizontal loop anomalies and a number of minor

satellite anomalies (Figure 4).

Anomalies A, B, C and D are magnetically and

geologically identified as being caused by sedimentary iron

formations consisting of banded magnetite and sulphide

mineralization. Anomalies E, F, G and H are magnetically and

11

geologically identified as being caused by non magnetic

sulphide mineralization and argillaceous sediments. Anomaly

I does not appear to have a bedrock source. The data for the

horizontal loop anomalies is listed as Table 1.

A northwest trending fault running between Line 17300E

at 131 -f 10 N and Line 17800 E at 125 * 00 N {Ploeger, 1982)

is seen as a major break in the magnetic picture. This

discontinuity appears to mark the contact between the

western sediments and the eastern volcanic sequences. This

fault also offsets a large peridotite mass in the southeast

corner of the property which gives a moderate to strong

magnetic anomaly.

The VLF survey detected most of the EM conductors as

well as some of the geologic contacts. An inferred VLF

anomaly running under Skunk Creek on Lines 17200 E f 17300 E

and 17400 E that was not covered in the horizontal loop

survey was tested by a hole drilled in 1954 by American

Metal Company Ltd. (AM 304) and intersected "limited

sulphide mineralization". This trend continues into the

Skunk Creek Property and more will be said about it in the

Skunk Creek survey results. Figure 3 depicts the remaining

holes previously drilled on the Duck Pond Property as well

as the horizontal loop anomalies.

Table 1: Horizontal Loop Anomalies A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H; 1982, Duck Pond Grid, 444 Hz, 80m coil separation

. LintAnomaly A

17000E

17100E

17200E

17400E

Anomaly B

17100E

17200E

17300E

17400E

17500N

176 DON

Anomaly C

17000E

17100E

17200E

17300E

17400E

Amonaly D

17300E

AnomalyCenter

128+OON

126+75N

126+20N

126+35N

12 9+8 ON

129+25N

12 8+4 ON

128+10N

129+32N

129+30N

129+OON

132+4 ON

131+86N

130+94N

130+04N

129+80N

130+94N

AnomalyWidth

32m

30m

30m

8m

thin

7m

46m

2m

4m

12m

74m

40m

28m

52m

42m

18m

2m

IndicatedDepth

10m

^m

^m

30m

24m

28m

20m

26m

18m

14m

8m

23m

18m

32m

^m

12m

22m

I.PMax.

-40

-48

-43

-10

-15

-15

-23

-22

-12

-35

-47

-19

-27

-13

-53

-12

-18

O.PMax.

-13

-12

-12

- 7

- 9

- 6

-11

- 6

-13

-12

-10

- 9

-11

- 6

-18

-16

-10

ResponseParameter

45

55

50

13

15

30

30

50

6

45

70

28

33

40

45

4

18

ConductivityThickness

160 mhos

200 mhos

180 mhos

50 mhos

50 mhos

100 mhos

100 mhos

180 mhos

21 mhos

160. mhos

250 mhos

100 mhos

120 mhos

140 mhos

160 mhos

14 mhos

65 mhos

wRemarks

Assume Dip 60 SWn

M

ii

Assume Dip 60 SWli

M

II

tt

It

Definitely multiple conduc ors

Assume Dip 60O SW11

11

fi

*

Assume Dip 60 SW

Continuation of Table: l Duck Pond Grid

LineAnomaly E

17200E

Anomaly F

17400E17500K

17600E

17700E

17800E

Anomaly G

17700E

17800E

Anomaly H

18000E

i

AnomalyCenter

132+88N

131+72N130+64N

130+25N

129+56N

129+24N

130+64N

130+28N

130+OON

AnomalyWidth

15m

15m48m

10m

16m

20m

thin

thin

24m

IndicatedDepth

28m

20m* 8m

< 8m

< 8m

^m

20m

23m

25m

I.PMax.

-13

-17-51

-57

-46

-28

-13

-11

-20

O.PMax.

- 7

-11-15

-20

-13

-20

-12

-10

- 7

ResponseParameter

20

1552

45

52

12

7

7

35


70 mhos

50 mhos180 mhos

160 mhos

180 mhos

43 mhos

25 mhos

25 mhos

125 mhos

mRema rk s

Assume Dip 90

-

Assume Dip 90H

i

ii

M

Assume Dip 90M

Assume Dip 90O

126 N -

"O

AM 303

HOLE 2

HOLE 3

HOLE 4 :

HEM CONDUCTOR

PROPOSED DRILL HOLE

PREVIOUS DRILL HOLE

FAULT

SURFACE SHOWING

LOCATION 128+25 N , 172 * 25 E

AZM 0450 , DIP - 500

DEPTH 130 m

LOCATION I29+75N , 1 72* 25 E

AZM 045 0 , DIP - 50 0

DEPTH 130m

LOCATION 126*00 N , 176*00 E

AZM OOO 0 , DIP - 50 0

DEPTH 150 m

FIGURE 3

KIDD CREEK MINES LTD.Explorotion Division Timmins.ONTARlO

DUCK POND AREA CUNNINGHAM TOWNSHIP

PROPOSEDDRILLING

SCALE' '. 5000

Drown ; DEL IProject N 0 : 75

: MZ , DM

Dote . 13 / 0\

15

Skunk Creek Grid

The Skunk Creek Grid is situated in east-central

Cunningham Township adjoining the east boundary of the M. W.

Resources (Shunsby) property. The property is geophysically

dominated by one major northwest trending horizontal loop

anomaly and two one line anomalies located under Skunk Creek

(Figure 8).

Anomaly A is the ground EM representation of an INPUT

anomaly east of Skunk Creek. The VLF survey shows this

trend continuing south to Line 14500 N and then branching

into two VLF anomalies. The magnetometer survey shows

conductor A to have a slight magnetic low similar to the

eastern conductors- in the Duck Pond Property. The VLF

anomaly on Line 14600 N at 170 -i- 60 E is coincident with a

north-south trending magnetic high.

The single horizontal loop anomaly called anomaly B is

coincident with and inferred west-northwest trending VLF

anomaly running under Skunk Creek. This non magnetic trend

may represent a fault rather than the non bedrock anomalies

that the other creek bottom responses appear to be; thus

Anomaly B may be the EM representation of conductive

material remobilized into the fault.

Anomlay C appears to mark the northern extent of the

VLF anomaly tested in 1954 by American Metals drill hole

(AM304). The drill hole results and the VLF anomaly is

Ib

discussed in the Duck Pond survey results.

Data for the horizontal loop anomalies found on the

Skunk Creek Grid is listed as Table 2. Figure 2 depicts the

horizontal loop anomaly for conductor A.

Peter Lake Grid

The Peter Lake Grid is situated in west-central

Cunningham Township at the Greenlaw Township boundary. The

property is geophysically dominated by a wide east-west

trending highly magnetic zone containing numerous strong

horizontal loop anomalies (Figure 12).

Anomalies A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H are all found in

this central zone of erratic magnetic highs. This zone has

been geologically identified (Ploeger, 1982) as a sequence

of cherty sediments containing magnetite and sulphide

mineralization. The highly conductive zones detected in the

horizontal loop survey represent numerous, closely spaced

conductors that give one large anomaly. The VLF survey has

been very helpful in separating the individual zones but

with so many anomalies, it is difficult to identify separate

conductors.

Anomalies I, J and K are found north of the magnetic

sediments in an area underlain by mafic to intermediate

metavolcanics and intrusives. Anomaly K is the only zone

coincident with a slight magnetic high. The data for the

Table 2: Horizontal Loop Anomalies A, B, C; 1982, Skunk Creek Grid, 444 Hz, 80m coil separation

Line

Anomaly A15000N14900E

14800N

14700N

Anomaly B14300N

Anomaly C

13600N

Anomoly Center

167+38E

168+28E

168+77E

169+4 9N

168+06E

171+67E

Anomaly Width

Urn

7m

12m

8m

13m

13m

Indicated Depth

25m

22m

19m

20m

10m

20m

I. PMax.

- 8

-13

-12

-20

-49

-12

0. PMax.

- 9

-12-15

-12

-12

-11

Response Parameter

2.6

3.5

2.5

9

55

8

Conductivity Thic kness

9 mhos

12 mhos9 mhos

32 mhos

200 mhos

28 mhos

—————————————————————— w——...

Remarks

QAssume Dip 30 SWn

M

11

Assume Dip 30 S W

Assume Dip 30 SW

.

HEM CONDUCTOR

- ^ PROPOSED DRILL HOLE

HOLE l

LOCATION I48 + 60N

AZM 0450 , DIP

DEPTH 100 m

, 167 -i- 75 E -55 0

FIGURE 2

KIDD CREEK MINES LTD.Explorotipn Division Timmins.ONTARIO

SKUNK CREEK AREA CUNNINGHAM TOWNSHIP

PROPOSED DRILLING

SCALE : l ; 5000

Drown i DEL Project N o ' 75

Oolo- MZ , DM

Dote : 13/01/83

19


A minor north-south magnetic trend is found at the west

boundary of the grid. This anomaly may represent one of the

north-south trending diabase dikes found in the township.

Running Ghost Lake Grid

The Cunningham/Greenlaw Township boundary and Running

Ghost Lake roughly divide this grid into two equal halves.

The property is geophysically dominated by a wide

north-south trending magnetic anomaly just east of Running

Ghost Lake. This erratic magnetic zone contains several

strong horizontal loop responses {Figure 16).

Anomalies R, F and I are all found in this central zone

of erratic magnetic highs. This zone has been geologically

identified (Ploeger, 1982) as containing several sedimentary

and felsic tuff horizons occurring within a mafic sequence

of tuffs and massive and pillowed flows. The conductive

component of the sediments is a series of cherty bands

containing magnetite and subordinate sulphide iron formation

which outcrop on the eastern side of the lake. The two weak

north-south trending magnetic anomalies on either side of

the lake reflect Matachewan type diabase dikes.

Anomalies A, B, C, D, G and H are all found outside of

the highly magnetic zone with only A and D having even a

slight magnetic response. Drilling in 1960 by The Anaconda

Table 3: Horizontal Loop Anomalies A, B, C, D, E, P, G,

Line

Anomaly A10800E10900E11000E

Anomaly B10400E

10500E

Anomalv C10600E

10700E10800E10900E

Anomaly D10800E10900E 11000E

Anomaly E11200E11300E11400E 11500E11600E11700E

Anomaly F11000E 11100E

AnomalyCenter

137+73N137+83N137+80N

140+05N

140+20N

142+16N

141+94N142+OON142+OON

143+86N143+80N 143+17N

141+60N142+18N142+72N 142+96N143+96N144+37N

140+44N 140+40N

AnomalyWidth

10m84m80m

52m

80m

20m

42mThin76m

16m24m

104m

185m140m256m 234m104m68m

28m 98m

IndicatedDepth

16m13m18m

Bm

^m

21m

18m37m< 8m

16m16m 9m

< 8m*8m*8m< 8mc 8m20m

21m c 8m

I.PMax.

-9-30-15

-21

2

-24

-29- 9-50

-27-19 -25

-43-55-51 -55-40-10

-10 -25

O.PMax.

-2-12-12

-20

-18

- 5

- 8- 4-16

-11-14 -19

-17-16-17 -22-16-11

-10 -20

H, I, J j 1982, Peter Lake Grid, 444 Hz, 80 m coil separat^j

ResponseParameter

43010

8

1

70

522545

3211 11

324542 30356

7 10


14 mhos107 mhos36 mhos

28 mhos

3 mhos

250 mhos

185 mhos90 mhos

160 mhos

114 mhos39 mhos 39 mhos

114 mhos160 mhos150 mhos 107 mhos124 mhos21 mhos

25 mhos . 36 mhos

Remarks

Assume Dip 90OAssume Dip 90Assume Dip 90O

Assume Dip 90

Quadrature Response

Assume Dip 90

Assume Dip 90Assume Dip 90A definite multiple conductor

Assume Dip 90Assume Dip 90O A definite multiple conductor

All responses are of multiple conductc Assume Dip 90Assume Dip 90Assume Dip 90 Assume Dip 90OAssume Dip 90Assume Dip 900

Assume Dip 900 A definite multiple conductor

Table 3 Continued....

Line

Anomaly G11300E11400E11500E11600E11700E

Anomaly H11700E

Anomaly I10300E10400E

Anomaly J10400E10600E

Anomaly K11300E11400E11500E11600E

AnomalyCenter

140+14N140+09N141+OON141+74N142+76N

140490N

146+70N147+08N

145+12N145+28N

150+32N150+70N150+90N151+32N

AnomalyWidth

20m50m

Thin4m

16m

3m

8m6m

Thin8m

ThinThin4m8m

IndicatedDepth

*8m*8m10m8m20m

22m

26m16m

28m23m

30m21m16m14m

I.PMax.

-50-35-30-25-19

-11

-3-5

-12-16

-6-20-32-35

O.PMax.

-18-19-16-20-10

-10

-4-8

-7-9

-6-9-8-8

ResponseParameter

401720109

8

33

1515

7255560


142 mhos60 mhos71 mhos36 mhos32 mhos

28 mhos

11 mhos11 mhos

53 mhos53 mhos

25 mhos89 mhos

196 mhos213 mhos

wRemark s

Assume Dip 90A definite multiple conductorAssume Dip 90Assume Dip 90Assume Dip 90

Assume Dip 90

Assume Dip 90

Assume Dip 90Assume Dip 90

Assume Dip 90Assume Dip 90Assume Dip 90Assume Dip 90

-

22

Company Ltd. on conductors A and D intersected graphitic

argillite and impure sediments with some stringer pyrrhotite

in a sequence of mafic tuffs and flows. The data for the


The VLF survey detected all of the EM conductors as

well as a major discontinuity between Lines 11400 N and

11300 N east of Running Ghost Lake. This anomaly offset may

be due to the diabase intrusion in this area of the

property.

MICHAEL W. 'ZAN

Table A : Horizontal Loop Anomalies A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I; 1982 RUNNING GHOST LAKE GRID, 444Hz, 80 m coil separaj

LineAnomaly A12 DOON11900N11800N11700N11600N11500N

Anomaly B11700N11600N

Anomaly C11400N11300N11200N

Anomaly D11100N11000N

Anomaly E11900N11800N

Anomaly F11900N11800N11700N11600N

11500N11400N

AnomalyCenter

95+30E95+60E96+08E96+23E96+40E96+62E

94+80E95+OOE

96+12E96+20E96+60E

95+90E97+10E

103+78N104+08E

102+85E102+86E103+20E103+43E102+52E102+80E102+70E

AnomalyWidth

14mThin12m9m34m20m

ThinThin

ThinThinThin

Thin13m

Thin2m

Thin50m150mThinThin?Thin?Thin.?

IndicatedDepth

21m24m^m14m8m9m

ShallowShallow

20m13m15m

27m22m

33m16m

38m12m22m12m-

17m17m

I.PMax.

-12- 2-35-23-36-36

-10- 9- 4

- 7-13

- 6--36

-10-38-12-27-18

-18-18

O.PMax.

-li- 3-18-14-16-15

- 6- 8

-11-33.- 7

- 7-10

- 5- 5

- 3- 8-10-16-

-13-13

ResponseParameter

82

20142529

642.5

710

990

45709

15-

1111


28 mhos7 mhos


103 mhos

LowLow


25 mhos36 mhos

32 mhos320 mhos

160 mhos250 mhos32 mhos.53 mhos

High^39 mhos39 mhos

———————————————————————— *P ————

Remarks

Assume Dip 90Assume Dip 90Assume Dip 90Assume Dip 90Assume Dip 90Assume Dip 90

Quadrature Respnse Assume Dip 90Assume Dip 90

Assume Dip 90Assume Dip 90Assume Dip 90



Assume Dip 90A definite multiple conductorA definite multiple conductor

Table 4 Continued.

Line

Anomaly G12100N 12000N

Anomaly H11700N

Anomaly I10900N 10800N

AnomalyCenter

107+05E 106+76E

105+20E

106+OOE 106+72E

Anomaly Width

Thin 7m

2m

Thin 4m

Indicated Depth

8m 19m

17m

14m ^m

I.PMax.

- 4 -14

-10

-20 -22

O.PMax.

-10 -12

-12

-15 -21

Response Parameter

1.6 9

5

11 7

Conductivity Thickness

6 mhos 32 mhos

18 mhos

39 mhos 25 mhos

———————————————————————— w- ,...,-

Remarks

Assume Dip 90 Assume Dip 90

o Assume Dip 90

Assume Dip 90 Assum Dip 90

25

REFERENCES;

Meen, V. B.

1942: Cunningham Garnet Area, District of Sudbury/

Ontario; Map No. Sif (to accompany On t. Dept. of Mines

Annual Report Vol. LI, Part 7, 1942), Scale 1:63,360 or

l inch to l mile.

OGS,

1982:Airborne Electromagnetic and Total Intensity

Magnetic Survey, Swayze Area, Isaiah Lake Sheet,

District of Sudbury: by Questor Surveys Limited for the

Ontario Geological Survey, Map 80 546

Geophysical/Geochemical Series, Scale 1:20 000. Survey

and Compilation December, 1980, to February 1981.

Ploeger, F.R.

1982: Kidd Creek Mines Ltd. Geological Report on

Cunningham 31, Running Ghost Lake, Peter Lake, Skunk

Creek and Duck Pond Grids, Cunningham Base Metals

Project #75, {N.T.S.: 41-0-10), November.

26

Siragusa, G. M.

1980: Cunningham Township Area, District of Sudbury;

Ontario Geological Survey Prelim. Map P. 2339

Geological Ser., Scale 1:15 840 or l inch to 1/4 mile.

Geology 1978.

Thurston, P.C., Siragusa, G.M., and Sage, R.P.

1977: Geology of the Chapleau Area, Districts of

Algoma, Sudbury, and Cochrane; Ontario Div. Mines,

GR157, 293p. Accompanied by Maps 2351 and 2352, scale

1:250,000, and Map 2221, Scale l inch to 4 miles

(1:253,440).

Nulurul

Ontario

Report of Work(Goophysiciil, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

' -X r\ "\

The Mining Act41018NE8034 2 .5483 CUNNINGHAM

9001'ype of Survay(s) Geophysicallaim Holder(t)

Township or AreaCunningham

Kidd Creek Mines Limitedurvey Company

Kidd Creek Mines Limited

Prospector i Licence No.

rp-1

Survey Dates (linecuttlng to office)

-l*?. lOBv

Total Miles of line Cut

91 kmJama and Address of Author (of Geo-Technlcal report)

M.W. Zang, Kidd Creek Mines Limited, 571 Moneta Ave., Timmins, Ontario P4N 7H9pedal Provisions Credits Requestednitruetloni

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes Sine cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Qtophyslcal

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Diyi ptr Claim

40

40

an Daysnstructlons

Complete reverse side ' and enter total(s) here

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Days per Claim

irborne Credits

Note: Special provisions

credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

xpenditures (excludes power

Days per Claim

ype of Work Performed •RitEiVEDarformed on Clalmlvl 181983

MINING LANDS Ste i/Oalculatlon of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

istructlonsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choke. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

aport Completedate of Report Recorded. Holder or Agent (Signature)

irtification Verifying Report of Work

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Cliim

Prefix

PP-

Number641172 J

641173 s

641174

641175

641176

641177641178 ^

641179 N641180

641181 \641182 \

641183

641184

641185641186 \

641187 .\641194 "x

641195 ^641196 x641197 x

641198 V

641199 v

641200

641201641202

Expand, Days Cr.

jT\f\

1

\

1

^

*

t*v—

For Office Use Onl6Total Days Cr. Date Recorded ,' Recorded /" l J 7IÂ. iy/% j(J ^ tJ/v Date Approved 4s Recorded

Mining ClaimPrefix

P

yft/^. fryf-A

fTotal nun claims co reporyjt,•f**^m**tgg&tf&t

S~

Number

641203

641204

. 641205

641206641207

641676

641677

641678641679

642065642133

642134

642135

64213664213764-2-1-38-;,:-:

' ""vi" \^* ^642139

64 2 14 Of f p,636223--

X Rccr;pt UcA&y&f —f 6 36226

limi636229fvOfvTi-j

636485

636486

Exptndi Days Cr.

\

\"\

V

\

Vs*-,

v.

*-x-''*

^

-

O l"*J; rv \j

\ r 19'

*

nber of mining irered by this ^^ 53

" -***r* L j — 'feQ4er. t̂ T^" ^

Reflifl8âTî^tffWcorder

SD

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

ime and Postal Address of Person Certifying

Micheal W. Zang, P.O. Box 1140, 571 Moneta Ave., Timmins, Ontario P4N 7H9Date Certified Certified by (Signature)

1983 09 26

27

2.5403

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7

Dear Sir:

RE: Geophysical (Electromagnetic 4 Magnetometer) Surveyon Mining Claims P 641172 et al In the Cunningham Township

The Geophysical (Electromagnetic 4 Magnetometer) Survey assessment work credits as listed with my Notice of Intent dated August 25, 1983 have been approved as of the above date.

Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours very truly,

E.F. AndersonDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380

R. P1chette:sccc: Kidd Creek Mines Ltd

Timmins, Ontario

cc: Resident Geologist Timmins, Ontario

r /C~X Ministry of Technical Assess INVl Natural .,, , ^ VjL/ Resources Work CreditsOntario

9

ment [nit | 2.5403

Date Mining Recorder'1 Report of

1983 08 25 workfjo. 2 7

Recorded HolderKIDD CREEK MINES LIMITED

Township or AreaCUNNINGHAM TOWNSHIP

Type of survey and number of Assessment day* credit per claim

Geophysical 40

40Magnet nmftter day*

Radiometric dayi

Induced pn!ari7ation , dayi

Other rinyc

Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claims Assessed" column

Rpologiral dayi

Man days d Airborne D

Special provision B Ground Q

FI Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

LJ C redits have been reduced because of corrections

to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Attested

P 641176 to 87 inclusive 641194 to 204 inclusive 641206 641676 to 79 inclusive 642065 642133 to 140 inclusive 636224 to 28 inclusive 636232 636485-86

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

30 DAYS CREDIT, ELECTROMAGNETIC 20 DAYS CREDIT, MAGNETOMETER

P 636223 . P 641172 to 75 641205

20 DAYS CREDIT, ELECTROMAGNETIC 641207p fidl 9nc\ jbtco

P 641172 to 75 inclusive JJl ? 636229 636229 641207

SJo credits have been allowed for, the following mining claims

1 _ 1 not sufficiently covered by the survey 1 _ 1 Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits If necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical 80; Geological 40; Geochemical 40; Section 77(19) 60:

S2B 183/6) "'

Ministry ofNaturalResources

ario

•1983 08 25

Mr. William L. GoodMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources60 Wilson AvenueTimmins, OntarioP4N 2S7

Dear Sir:

Your file: #27

2.5403Our file:

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.

For further information, if required, please contact Mr. F.W. Matthews at 416/965-1380.

Yours very truly,

Anderson Tree to r

Land Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1316R. Pichette:mc

Ends:cc: Kidd Creek Mines Ltd

Box 1140571 Moneta Avenue Timmins, Ontario P4N 7H9

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining k Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

B45

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontario

Notice of Intent

for Technical Reports 1983 08 25

2.5403/27

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim.remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Lands Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

Kidd Creek Mines Ltd.Box 1140571 Moneta Avenue, Timmins, Ontario P4N 7H9 (705) 267-1188

Mr. E. F. Anderson, Director Land Management Branch Whitney Block, Room 6450 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3

Dear Sir:

Exploration Division

August 15, 1983

RECEIVED•'•OS J 8 1983

MINING LANDS SECTION

RE: Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) Survey on Mining Claims P 641172 et al in the Cunningham Township

Herein are three plans for the above-described survey, copy has been signed quoting file 2.5403.

Yours very truly,

Each

Mike Zang

MZ/srw Encl.

IciOO

August 5, 1983 2.5403

Kidd Creek Mines Ltd Box 1140571 Moneta Avenue Timmins, Ontario P4N 7H9

Attention: M.W. Zang

Dear Sir:

RE: Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) Survey on Mining Claims P 641172 et al 1n the Cunningham Township

Returned herein are three plans for the above-described survey. Please sign each copy and return them quoting file 2.5403.

For further Information, please contact Mr. F.VI. Matthews at (416)965-1380.

Yours very truly.


Whitney Block, Room 6450 Queen's Block Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-1380

S. Hurst:me

Encl.

cc: Mining Recorder Timmins, Ontario

Ministry olNaturalResources

Ontario

GeotechnicalReportApproval

Mining Lands Comments

To: Geophysics fa

Comments

((f -Zt

|~"1 Approved to tee again with correctionsDate

To: Geology - Expenditures

Comments

j Approved [ | With to tee again with corrections

D

Date Signature

To: Geochemistry

Comments

l

Q Approved Q Wish to tee again with correctionsDate Signature

l [TO: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380)

1593 ( 81/10)

1983 03 10 2,5403

Mining Recorder Ministry of Nat ral 60 Wilson Avenue T1ram1ns, Ontario PAN 2S7

Dear Sir:

Me have received reports and maps for a Geophysical {Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims P 641172 et al In the Township of Cunningham.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.Yours very truly*


Whitney Block, Room 6450Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1380

A. Barr:se

cc: Kidd Creek Mines Limited Timmins, Ontario Attnt Mr. M.W. Zang.

Kidd Creek Mines Ltd.Box 1140571 Moneta Avenue,Timmins, Ontario P4N 7H9(705)267-1188 Exploration Division

February 25, 1983

RECEIVEDMr. E. F. Anderson,Director, Land Management Branch,Queen's Part' ^ 6450 ' WNINC

Toronto, Ontario. M7A 1W3.

Dear Sir:

Re: Cunningham Township

Enclosed please find duplicate copies of a report and maps

covering claims in Cunningham Township.

Your prompt attention to this matter would be greatly

appreciated.

Yours truly,

KIDD CREEK MINES LTD. EXPLORATION

M. W. ZAN6/. ^ A**f y

MWZ/mg Encl.

IciOO

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

J* J KOW i/)

b* O

Type of Survey(s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s)—.

Geophysical

Cunningham

Kidd Creek Mines Ltd.

P.O. Box 1140, 571 Moneta Ave.. Timmins , Ont.

Survey fYimpany Kidd Creek Mines Limited

Author of Report. Address of Author.Covering Dates of Survey August 1982 - Feb 1983

(linecutting to office)rt T

Total Miles of Line Cut.

M.W. Zang, Kidd Creek Mines Ltd.

571 Moneta Avenue, Timmins, Ontario

91 Km

SPECIAL PROVISIONSCREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

Geophysical —Electromagnetic-—Magnetometer,.

—Radiometric.—, .-ntWrnpnlngiral

fipnrhrmirfil.

DAYS per claim

40

40

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne lurveys)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

. -.. f Author of Report orient S\

Res. Geol.. . Qualifications.Previous Surveys

File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

(number)

TOTAL CLAIMS.

637 (5/791

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS -- If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations.

Station interval ——— 20m

Profile srale Horizontal Loop, lcm = 2 OS*; VLF, lcm = 20m

.Number of Readings -————

.Line spacing______100m

Contour interval Variable, depending on magnetic relief

C

K2;C

Instrument Geometrics G616————————————,——————-————————————

Accuracy — Scale constant - l n.t. (gamma)_________________________________ Diurnal correction method A number of base stations were set up on each grid and

Base Station check-in interval (hnnrs) checked every 3-4 hours. Water obstacles made itBase Station location and value impossible to either systematically loop the base lines or to tiw together the various base stations.

w

J*

fa

Instrument Apex Parametrics MaxMin II

ECTROMAGNETK Coil configuration

Coil separationArrurary

Method:444 Hz Freouencv

Horizontal Loop80 metres•f

d Fixed transmitter d Shoot back C3 In line and 1777 Hz

d Parallel line

Parameters measured.

Instrument

(specify V.L.F. station)In-Phase and Quadrature components of secondary field as percent

of transmitted field.

constant.

Corrections made.

O Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy.

Z O*—(

H

*-H

X <

CnaUJuD Q 2,

Instrument _________ Method d Time Domain Parameters — On time .——

- Off time ——

d Frequency Domain _ Frequency ______ Range _^___^__

Delay time.

time.

Power.

Electrode array — Electrode spacing . Type of electrode

SELF POTENTIALInstrument___________________________________________ Range,Survey Method ______________________________________-———

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRICInstrument.Values measured.Energy windows (levels).^——^^.——^^-———.——————--————-.-..—.—.........—.Height of instrument____________________________Background Count, Size of detector____________________________________.-———^———.

Overburden _____________________________________________.(type, depth - include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.) Type of survey_______VLF Station_______

Instrument _________f'-rong Geophysics Radgn

Accuracy____________________________Parameters m MS..rrri DiP Of E- M - field

_______________VLF Stations used N-S Lines; Seattle. Wash. E-W Lines Annapolis. ,,. . , . r . ...Maryland ,. , .Additional information (for understanding results)^-^———^——————————^^^—^^^^^—^^^^——.

AlHgORNK SMRYfiy.S Type of survey(s)-———

Instrument{s) ——————(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy——————————————(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used-——————.—^^—.-.——..—————...——^—————

Sensor altitude-Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude_______________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area__________________________Over claims only.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight—————— Method of Collection________

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development- Sample Depth————— Terrain—————————

Drainage Development———————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODS

Values expressed in: per cent p. p. m,

Da a

Cu; Pb,Others—

Zri, Ni, Ag, Mo, As,-(circle)

Field AnalysisExtraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. .———————^

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis—-—.

Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used ——

Commercial Laboratory Name of Laboratory- Extraction MfthnH

Analytical Method Reagents Used ———

.tests)

.tests)

-tests)

GeneraL General.

Kidd Creek Mines Ltd.Box 1140571 Moneta Avenue,Timmins, Ontario P4IM 7H9(705)267-1188 Exploration Division

SCHEDULE OF MINING CLAIMS FOR WHICH

WORK CREDITS ARE REPORTED

P -p -p -p ~

p *~

p -p -

p -

p -p -

p -p -p -p -p ~

p -p -p -p -p -p -p -p -

636223"''"

636224636225

636226

636227

636228636229

636232 i/

636485^-

636486

641172 ̂

641173641174

641175

641176

641177641178641179

641180641181

641182641183641184

P -

P -

P -

P -

p —P -

P -

P -P -

P -

P -P -P -

P -P -

P -

P -

P -P -

P -

P -

P -

641185

641186641187

641194 "^

641195641196641197

641198

641199

641200

641201641202

641203

641204641205

641206

641207

641676-^

641677

641678641679

642065^

P - 642133

P - 642134P - 642135

P - 642136

P - 642137

P - 642138P - 642139

P - 642140

kidd

Swayze Twp. M. iiso

6!949I X fi 1949 2 .619493' 495

619105 j 6191041619^03

~"

636 03 2 I636033|6 S 6034 l A \

; 764817~~ ~ ^" ~

4M?4- - ,764829 .764830

^ 46970a\ s

'^MROI 43948;469710 1 469709(101666

VV 469?,7

641356 f

6411 9 O i64' l 69 l b a

(G5009C, |ti5009: |

l

uyt. t- 1650093

-i 641 !6i [64: 160 ,64I 159 l

Blamey Twp. M. 668 J4101WslE3*34 2.5403 CUNNINGHAM 200

THE TOWNSHIP OF

CUNNINGHAMDISTRICT OF

SUDBURY

PORCUPINEMINING DIVISION

SCALE:1-INChN4O CHAINS

LEGEND

PATENTED LAND CROWN LAND SALE LEASESLOCATED LAND LICENSE OF OCCUPATION MINING RIGHTS ONLY SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY- ROADSIMPROVED ROADS KING'S HIGHWAYS

RAILWAYS POWER LINES MARSH OR MUSKEG MINES CANCELLED PATENTED FOR SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY

NOTES400 Surface Rights Reservation shores of all lakes a rivers

?t,a

PLAN NO.- M.744ONT\KH3

MINISTRY OF NATURAL P-CGURCESSURVEYS ANO M Ar-TiNO bKANCH

6412

0964

12

08

Pro

pe

rty

-S-.

To

plw

t

^"X

. K

ino

gam

a *"

*x. K

or m

o*

6 41

207

64 1

206

KEY

MAP

SC

ALE

PE

TE

R

6 41

205

64

l 204

641

20

3

64

12

01

6412

OO

LEG

END

INSTRUMENT

: GEOMET

RICS

G8

16TYPE

: PROTON PRECESSION. TOTAL FIELD

READIN

GS IN GAMMAS

A MAGNETIC BASE STATION

116468

64

119

864

11 9

9

64

I2O

O

64

12

02

l 16467

116

468

641

l 98

K A

W l

LA

KE

RO

Vft

falA

L

PA

RK

KE

Y

MAP

SC

ALE

6 4

11 9

4

641195

LEG

END

INSTRU

MENT

: GEOMETRICS G816

TYPE

: PR

OTON PR

ECESSI

ON.

TOTAL

FIELQ

READINGS IN GAMM

ASA MAGNET

IC BASE

STATION

—————58400

KI DP

CREEK MINES

LTD.

MAGNETIC SU

RVEY

CUNNINGHAM 31

PETER

LAKE GRID

NTS:41-0-1

0 PROJ.#75

6411

93

641

19

264

l l

91

41

01

*NE

W3

4

2.5

48

3

CU

NN

ING

HA

M

6411

99

116

468

KE

Y

MAP

6411

94S

TR

ON

G

VLF

A

NO

MA

LY

MO

DE

RA

TE

V

LF

A

NO

MA

LY

6411

97

WE

AK

V

LF

A

NO

MA

LY

LEG

END

INF

ER

RE

D

VL

F

AN

OM

AL

Y

6411

96DI

P ANGLE

(DEGRE

ES

641195

INST

RUMENT

: CRON

E RADE

MSTAT

ION

: CUTL

ER.

17.8 KH?

PROF

ILE

SCALE

: DIP

ANGL

E l

CM^

200

KIDD CREEK

MINES LT

VLF

SURVEY

CUNNINGHAM 31

•PET

E4?

LAK

E

GR

ID

NT

S:4

i-Q

-10

PR

OJ.

#75

64 1

193

6411

9264

1191

4101iS

NE

a034

2.5

403

CU

NN

ING

HA

M

UJ

CD

CD

C3

CD Ld

152

N

UJ o CD Lu

LJ

C3

CD CM CD

UJ

CD

C

D m

o

UJ

CD

CD LU

LJ

CD

CD LO

C

D UJ

CD

CD CD

CD

CD r-

CD

LJ

CD

C

D CD

CD UJ

_l

UJ

CD

CD CD CD

LJ

LU"

CD

C

DC

D

CD

CD

—

'

LJ

U.

2:

^

LJ

UJ

LJ

LJ

CD

C

D

CD

C

D

LJ

OC

D

CD

C

D

CD

C

OCM

m

^r

LO

LJ

LJ

UJ

UJ

JL \•- P

:J

4 S

2 S

' 64

1209

^j

S N

\

^ ^

j

3 H

L..

J

10 N T

~

LO Lu -J

4 N

LJ

CD

CD r- UJ

152

N

64

12

08

KE

Y

MAP

SC

ALE

O

ST

RO

NG

V

LF

A

NO

MA

LY

MO

DE

RA

TE

V

LF

A

NO

MA

LY

WE

AK

V

LF

A

NO

MA

LY

INF

ER

RE

D

VL

F

AN

OM

AL

Y

N \ o

LEG

EN

D DIP

ANGL

E (D

EGREES

)

12 D

INSTRUMENT

: CRONE RAQEM

STATION

: CUTLER.

17.8

KHz

PROFILE SCALE

: DIP

ANGLE

i CM^

200

40

S DI

PS 80

N DIPS

120

160

200

METRES

( 1:20

00

KID

D

CR

EEK

VLF

MIN

ES

LT

D.

SU

RV

EY

CU

NN

ING

HA

M

31P

ETE

R

LAK

E

GR

IDN

TS:41-0

-10

UQ

RK

BY

M, ^, ^-^

PR

OJ.

#75

DA

TE

1982

6411

99II 6

467

116468

KE

Y

MAP

SC

ALE

6411

94

[J

HE

M

AN

OM

AL

Y

LEG

END

444

H2

IN-PHASE READINGS

64

11

96

6411

95

64 1

97

QUADRATURE READINGS

INSTRUMENT

: AP

EX PARAMETRICS MAXMIN II

FREQUENCY

: 444

HzCOIL SPACING

: 80

METRES

PROFILE SCALE

: l CM=

207.

- R

EA

DIN

GS

-f R

EA

DIN

GS

641193

6411

9164

1192

41010N

EO

e34

2.5

-10

3

CU

NN

ING

HA

M

I-

MAP

SC

ALE

: i"

: 8

Q.

HE

M

AN

OM

ALY

LEG

EN

D

444

Hz

IN-P

HA

SE

R

EA

DIN

GS

•M

Oa

x QUADRATURE READIN

GS

INSTRU

MENT

: APEX PA

RAME

TRICS

MAXM

IN

IIFREQUENCY

: 44

4 Hz

COIL SPACING

: 30 METRES

PROFILE

SCALE

: l CM=

20X

40

READINGS 30

- READINGS

120

160

200

METRES

( 1:20

00

KIDD CREEK

MINE

S LTD

HORIZONTAL LOOP SURVEY

CU

NN

ING

HA

M

31

PETE

R

L.AK

EN

TS

M2-0

-10

PR

OJ#

75

•QRK

B

fFA

TE

1982

410H

SN

E0S

134

2.5

403

CU

NN

ING

HA

M260

ISO

N

48

N

146

N

144

N

42

N

UJ

CD

C

D

CD UJ

6412

09C

DC

D

6412

08

4I0

1.N

EM

34

2

.5*3

3

CU

NN

ING

HA

M

6412

X0

O\

-SO

-R

641

198

KE

Y

MA

P

SC

ALE

:

I"

r 8

mile

s

N CD

—I

O

LEG

EN

D

1777 Hz

IN-PHASE READINGS

•i o

D y. QUADRATURE READINGS

INSTRUMENT

: APEX PARAMETRICS MAXMIN

IIFREQUENCY

: 17

77 Hi

COIL SPACING

: 30 METRES

PROFILE SCALE

: l

CM=

2QX

4- READINGS

- READINGS

————t-

4030

120

160

200

METRES

t l :2000

KIDD

CREEK

MINES

LTD


CU

NN

ING

HA

M

3!

PE

TER

LA

KE

NT

S:4

2-Q

-10

P

RO

J#7S

'OR

K Bf

1382

27

0

11

64

66

6412

02

6411

99116467

11

64

68

—

140

N

KE

Y

MA

P

SCA

LE

i" r

S

mile

s

6411

94

64

97LE

GEN

D 1777 Hz

IN-PHASE READINGS

6411

96

64 195

QUADRATURE READINGS

INSTRUMENT


IIFREQUENCY

: 1777

Hz

COIL SPACING

: 80

METRES

PROFILE SCALE

: l CM

= 20

7.

- R

EA

DIN

GS

RE

AD

ING

S

641

193

6411

9264

1 19

1

41010N

E0034 2.5

4*3

C

UN

NIN

GH

AM

u:

WV

HO

NIN

Nm

-10

O—

——

——

——

——

—

98

E

KE

Y

MA

P

SC

AL

E

l11

-- S

mile

s

AS

TRO

LEG

END 1777

Hz

IN-P

HASE

READINGS

i o

n x

i QUADRATURE READINGS

INSTRUMENT


IIFREQUENCY

: 1777 Hz

COIL SPACING

: 80 METRES

PROFILE SCALE

: l

CM^

20X

READINGS

- READINGS

-O

403D

20ISO

200

METRES

f l:2000

KIDD CREEK

MINES

LT


CU

ISA

ING

HA

V

3i

RUNNING GHOST

LAKE

NTS:42-0

-10

PROJ#75

'ORK 3V

"ATE

41010NE2834 2.5403 CUNNINGHAM

230

KE

Y

MAP

SC

ALE

LEG

EN

D 1777 Hz

IN-PHASE READINGS

QUADRATURE READINGS

INSTRUMENT


IIFREQUENCY

: 1777

Hz

COIL SPACING

: 80

METRES

PROFILE SCALE

: l CPN 2DX

RE

AD

ING

S-

RE

AD

ING

S

KID

D

CR

EEK

INE

S

LTD

.


CU

NN

1NG

HA

M

31

RUNNING GHOST LAKE

NT

S:4

2-0

-iO

P

RO

J#75

4101*N

eC

ia34

2.5

403

CU

NN

ING

HA

M3

00

LJ

PO

CD

CD en O LJ

CD

;CL

\

KIV

HO

NIN

Nro

;"\"

1sc

'dM

j, M

V~

lN33

d9t

10 W

IO

N ^

(D CL

16 E

/ f

f

2 E

r

L *t-

i 7 t 6 E

\

100

E

98

E

34

E

KE

Y

MA

P

SC

ALE

:

1"^

S

mile

s

.. ....

AST

R:

C e

ST

RO

NG

V

LF

A

NO

MA

LY

MO

DE

RA

TE

V

LF

A

NO

MA

LY

WE

AK

V

LF

A

NO

MA

LY

INF

ER

RE

C

VLF

A

NO

MA

LY

LEG

END IP

A

NG

LE

(DE

GR

EE

S

12

ED

INSTRUMENT

: CRONE RAOEM

STATION

: ANNAPOLIS, 21.4 KH

z PROFILE SCALE

: DIP ANGLE

l C^ 20

0

W DIPS

E 3IPS

-D-

4D12

160

200

METRES

l :200

0 J

KIDD

CR

EEK

MINES

LTD

VLF

SURVEY

CUNNINGHAM 31

RUNNING GHOST LAKE GRID

NTS:41-0-10

PROJ.#75

JQR

K

BYD

ATE

1982

41

01

8N

EO

T3

4

2.5

403

CU

NN

ING

HA

M3

10

108

106

E

104

E

102

E

O e

KE

Y

MA

P

SC

ALE

:

\"

-- 8 m

iles

. A

STR

O

ST

RO

NG

V

LF

A

NO

MA

LY

MO

DE

RA

TE

V

LF

A

NO

MA

LY

WE

AK

V

LF

A

NO

M A

LY

INF

ER

RE

D

VL

F

AN

OM

AL

Y

LEGEND DIP

ANCLE

(DEGRE

ES

INSTRUMENT

: CRONE RADEM

STATION

: ANNAPOLIS, 21.4 KH

z PROFILE SCALE

: DIP ANGLE

l C^ 20

0

W 3IPE

E DIPS

8012

0160

200

METRES

( l :2

000

J

KIDD

CREEK

MINES

V L

F SURVEY

CUNNINGHAM 31

RUNNING GHOST LAKE GRID

NTS:41-0-10

PRDJ.#75

SVDATE

1982

41010NE0a34 a.5403 CUNNINGHAM

320

KE

Y

MAP

SC

ALE

LEG

END

444

Hz

IN-P

HASE READINGS

2-18J.

l

QUADRATURE READINGS

INSTRUMENT

: APEX PARAMETRICS MAXhIN

IFREQUENCY

: 44

4 Hz

COIL SPACING

: 80 METRES

PROFILE SCALE

: i CM=

20X

KIDD CREEK MINES

LTD.


CU

NN

ING

HA

M

31

RU

NN

ING

G

HO

ST

uAK

EN

TS

:42

-0-1

0

PR

OJ#

75

M.

u/,

41010NE0034 2.5403 CUNNINGHAM

KE

Y

MA

P

SCA

LE

LEG

END

444

Hz

IN-P

HA5E

RE

ADIN

GS

QUADRA

TURE

RE

ADINGS

INSTRU

MENT

: AP

EX PARA

METR

IC^

MAXhIN

IIFREQUENCY

: 444

HzCOIL SPACING

: 80 METRES

PROFILE

SCAL

E :

I CM^

20X

METRES

l

1:2000

KIDD

CREEK MINES

LTD


CU

NN

ING

HA

M

31

RUNNING GH

OST

L.AKE

NTS:42-0-10

PROJ#75

KEY MAP

SCALE

|"S

Smil

es

INST

RUME

NT

: GEOM

ETRI

CS G816

TYPE

: PROTON PRECESSION, TOTAL FIELD

READINGS IN

GAMMAS

A MAGNETIC BASE STATION

4080

120

1BO

200

METRES

( l:2000

KIDD

CREEK

MINES

LTD.

MAGNETIC SURVEY

CUNNINGHAM 31

RUNN

ING

GHOST

LAKE GRID

NTS:

41-0-10

PROJ.#75

UQRK

BY

DATE

1982

41018NE0034 2.54*3 CUNNINGHAM

350

—

i 08

E

—

106

E

ffig

jLxjo

^

IWH

ON

INN

H—

1C4

E

KE

Y

MA

P

SC

ALE

:

l" :

Sm

iles

\AS

TRO

LEGEND

INSTRUMENT

: GEOM

ETRICS

G816

TVPE

: PROTON

PRECESSION.

TOTA

READ

INGS IN GAMMAS

A MAGN

ETIC

BASE STAT

ION

80ISO

200

METRES

( i:20

0C

J

KIDD CREEK MINES

LTD

MAGNETIC SU

RVEY

CUNNINGHAM 31

RUNNIN

G GHOST

LAKE GRID

NTS:4i

-0-10

. PROJ.#75

UDRK BY

OA^TE

l 362

410ieNE0034 2.5483 CUNNINGHAM

36

0

17C

E

168

E

ro CVJ ^J CD CL

KE

Y

MA

P

SC

ALE

;

l" --

Sm

iles

..-

ASTR

O

EG

EN

D

'; T

! T.

J "

i t-

N

l :

F ^ ?

' ^

G ~

""'-

3*\

ET;

: BA

SE

S

r P:

1; •S

f i*—

it- ^

N'

V1 ir

-- V-Y

i

MAGNETIC SURVEY

CUNNINGHAM 31

SKUN

KK

* .^

i. *J

2.5403 CUNNINGHAM

370

170

E

168

E

166

E

164

E16

4 E

Top*

-, e t

Kin

ogcm

o -*

v

Kor

mok

i -v-

(

jultb

n l

KE

Y

MA

P

SC

ALE

l"

: 8

mile

s

AS

TR

O

HE

W

AN

OM

ALY

LEG

EN

D

444

Hz

IN-P

HA

SE

R

EA

DIN

GS

+ 1

DD

X 'Q

UADRATURE

READINGS

INS

TR

UM

EN

T

: A

PE

X

PA

RA

ilET

RIC

S

MA

XM

IM

IIFR

EQ

UE

NC

Y

: 444

H?C

OIL

. S

PA

CIN

G

: 80

M

ETR

ES

PR

OF

ILE

S

CA

LE

: i

C^

23Y

.

4-

RE

AD

ING

S

80

-

RE

AD

ING

S

120

ISO

ME

TRE

S

TT H

Ol

ullL

JiCR

EEK

MINES

LTD

HO

RIZ

ON

TA

L LO

OP

SU

RV

LYC

UN

NIN

GH

AM

31

SK

UN

K

GR

IDN

TS

Ml -0

-10

PR

OJ.

#75

JOR

K

E<

98

41010NE0834

2.5403

CUNNINGHAM

380

74

E —

172

E

170

E

168

166

164

E

162

E

Off

#0

OD

'

KE

Y

MA

P

SC

ALE

:

l" =

8m

iles

H

AS

TRO

ST

RO

NG

V

LF

A

NO

MA

LY

MO

DE

RA

TE

V

LF

A

NO

MA

LY

WE

AK

V

LF

A

NO

MA

LY

INF

ER

RE

D

VL

F

AN

OM

AL

Y

LEG

EN

D IP

AN

GLE

I

DE

GR

EE

S )

. LE

R.

l - -8

KH

?;

r P

AN

G^F

l

CM

- 20

E T

IPS

U U

RE

EK

K

IHE

S

•7 L

F S

UR

VE

YC

UN

NIN

GH

AM

31

SK

UN

K

CR

EE

KN

TS

:41

--0

-10

P

RO

J#75

'A'F

m.

41

0l0

NE

0e

34

2

.54*3

C

UN

NIN

GH

AM

390

f l

[74

E

172

E

170

E

IBS

E

166

E

164

E

162

E

—

170

E

174

E

ro CVJ t co

172

E

ro

ro cvi tf (D

168

E

—

166

E

——

.6

4

E

—

162

E

KE

T

MA

P

SC

AL

E:

l" r

8 m

iles

AS

TR

O

ÊG

EN

D

17

77

Hz

IN^P

HA

SE

R

EA

DIE

S

QLf

AQ

RA

FJR

E

RE

AD

TN

SS

i AR

Er

KA

RA

Mft

R I

TS^

FRE

QU

EN

CY

i

17T

7 H

? C

OIL

5P

AC

TMS

i

&J

M,E

TRES

P

RO

FIL

E

SC

AI.P

i

l C

M^

207.

RE

AD

TNS

SR

FA

QW

SS

4012

016

020

0

ME

TRE

S

( 1

:20

00

Kl

HD

R

NTS hA

DO I

•42

f t- d

Z -o tlRK

CR

EEH

MIN

ES

LT

C

ON

TAL

LOO

PC

UN

NIN

GH

AM

31

SKU

NK

-10

BY ^^*~

^~

~s?7

GR

ID

y "

' '

--'

s

'•-^

'

x j

K

SU

RV

EY

PR

OJ.

#75

DAT

E

.382

41

0ia

NE

*fii3

4

a.5

48

3

CUN

NIN

GH

AM

40

0-r

-

-T"

64 1

66

- 78

642065

S3 4

86

P j

64 2

l

l- S

94S

6K

EY

M

AP

SC

ALE

:

l"--

S

mile

s

, ^5

90

00

6 4

21

36

64

21

37

64

2

l 35

LEG

EN

D

!\CTRJN;ENT

: GEOMETRICS GS16

: P K u T 3 N

PREC

ESSI

ON'.

T 3

IN GAMMAS

MAGNET:: bA

SE S

TATI

ON

6421 4O

KIDD CREEK MIMES

MAGNETIC SURVEY

CUNNINGHAM 31

DUCK

PO

ND

GR

ID

64

21

38

NT

S:4

1-0-

10

410

10N

E8S1

34

2.5

403

CU

NN

ING

HA

M410

134

132

—

130

N

128

N

ZS N

KE

Y

MA

P

SC

AL

E

l"

-- e

mile

s

LEGEND

177"

? Hz

IN-PHASE READINGS

: *!

O

l- n

x

i QUADRATURE READINGS

INSTRUMENT


IIFREQUENCY

: [7

77 H

zCOIL SPACING

: 30 METRES

PRDFILE SCALE

: l

CM-

20X

4- READINGS

- READINGS — --

——U'

4030

.20

.60

METRES

(

1:2000

DO CREEK hlNES LT

Q


CU

NN

ING

HA

M

31

DUCK

POND GR

IDNTS:42-0-10

PRO J

. #7S

41010NE0fc34 2.5403 CUNNINGHAM

420

126

N

M 36

\t

': l

' K

i

i \ \

4 *

k

t95

i

] a

e

i L

"

7 [:

:::1

* "s

-

' "s

* '

i ft

e *

o"

STR

ON

G

VL

F

AN

OM

ALY

MO

DE

RA

TE

V

LF

A

NO

MA

LY

WE

AK

V

L F

A N

OM

ALY

INF

ER

RE

D

VL

F

AN

OM

AL

Y

LEG

END C

IP

AN

GLE

(

DE

GR

EE

S J

12

N

INSTRUMENT

: CRONE RAQEM

STATION

: SEATTLE, ^48

KH?

PROFILE SCALE

: CI

P ANGLE

l CM- 20

r

S DIPS

N DIPS

-O

4012;

160

METRES

C l:2GQQ

KIDD CREEK

MINES

LTD

VLF

SURVEY

CU

NN

ING

HA

M

31

DUCK

POND GR

IDN

TS:

42--

0 -l

PR

OJ.

#75

41

0le

h4

E0

83

4

2.5

403

CU

NN

ING

HA

M4

30

MAP

SCALE

: l"

: Sm

iles

444

Hz

IN-PHA5E READINGS

QUADRATURE RE

ADIN

G!

INSTRUMENT

: APEX^PARAMETRICS MAXMIN

IFREQUENCY

: 444 Hz

COIL

SPACING

: 80 METRES

PROFILE SCALE

: l

CM= 20X

READINGS

- READINGS

-O

4080

120

160

200

METRES

l l:2000

KID

D

CR

EE

K

HO

RIZ

ON

TA

LC

UN

NIN

G

DU

CK

PON

TS

:41

-0-1

0

JDR

K B

Y

^ ̂

'^S

Mlh

TES

LTD

-

LOO

P

SU

RV

EY

HA

M

31

NO

GR

ID PP

I"!

1 #

7'

1 1 v

U -,

J - ff '

-, .*

i *--

, ,

,-^-c

-^G

ATE

1982

41010NEae34 a.5403 CUNNINGHAM

440

Documents

KIDD CREEK MINES LTD. GEOPHYSICAL REPORT ON …€¦ · DEL [Project NO -- 75 Oott 027 12/82 SKUNK CREEK l GRID RUNNING GHOST GRID MARINER ENERGY MINERALS Ltd Option CONSOLIDATED