Upload
david-roland
View
244
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
This appendix includes copies of the trial court judgment, the applicable statutes, and a set of stipulations agreed to by the Missouri Real Estate Commission.
Citation preview
SC91125
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI
KANSAS CITY PREMIER APARTMENTS, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MISSOURI REAL ESTATE COMMISSION,
Defendant-Respondent.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PLATTE COUNTY
The Honorable Abe Shafer, Judge
APPELLANT’S BRIEF—APPENDIX
DAVID E. ROLAND, Mo. Bar #60548 Freedom Center of Missouri 5938 De Giverville Ave. St. Louis, Missouri 63112 Telephone: (314) 604-6621 Facsimile: (314) 720-0989 [email protected] Attorney for the Plaintiff/Appellant
TABLE OF CONTENTS TO APPENDIX
Judgment……………………………………………………………………………. A1
First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution………………………………………….. A7
Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution…………………………………… A7
Article I, Section 2 of the Missouri Constitution…………………………………… A8
Article I, Section 8 of the Missouri Constitution…………………………………… A9
Article I, Section 10 of the Missouri Constitution………………………………….. A9
Article III, Section 40(30) of the Missouri Constitution……………………………. A9
Section 339.010, RSMo……………………………………………………………... A9
Section 339.170, RSMo……………………………………………………………... A14
Section 339.180, RSMo……………………………………………………………… A15
Section 558.011, RSMo……………………………………………………………… A15
20 CSR 2250-8.090…………………………………………………………………... A18
Plaintiff’s Trial Exhibit #6 (MREC Responses to Requested Stipulations)…………. A30
A1
7. 0 0 IE] [ 7. 9L9 0 N XH 1 X.L ] £ I : 9 I mIA, 0 I 07.1 0 f: 19 0
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PLATTE COUNTY, MISSOURI
SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
KANSAS CITY PREMIER ) APARTMENTS, INC., ) 1I JUN 3 0 2010 (gI
) SANDRA L. OOWD Plaintiff, ) Clerk of the Circuit Court Platte County, Mo
) v. ) Case No. 07AE-CV01240
) Division 1 MISSOURI REAL ESTATE ) COMMISSION, )
) Defendant. )
JUDGMENT
On the 23 rd day of June, 2010, Plaintiff Kansas City Premier Apartments appeared
by corporate representative and by Counsel Dave Roland and Timothy J. Thonlpson.
Tiffany Le,vis and Ryan Gran appeared in person and by Counsel Dave Roland and
Timot11Y J. Thonlpson. The Missouri Real Estate Commission appeared by Counsel
Edwin Frownfelter.
The Court heard evidence and arguments of the parties.
Now on this 30th day of June, 2010, the Court lllakes the following findings and
enters judgment as follows,
1. The Court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject mauer of this action.
2. Kansas City Premier Apartments (KCP A) filed on April 16, 2007, requesting a
declaratory judgment that § 339.010.1 does not encompass its business activities; that
Kepr'\ is exenlpt from the provisions of Chapter 339; that the Missouri Real Estate
Conlnlission (MREC) violated KCPA's right to due process as protected under the
Fourteenth Amendment and the Missouri Constitution; that the statute violates KCPA's
928826L6 : 01 02:90 0T02-T0-lnr
A2
[7.9L9 ON XM/X.LJ £1:91 (l3A\ 010ZIOC/90
freedon1 of speech as protected under the First Amendment and the Missouri
Constitution, and that the statute violates KCPA's right to equal protection of the law as
protected under the Fourteenth Amendment and the Missouri Constitution. The MREC
filed a motion to dismiss. In an order issued on November 26, 2007, Judge Hull
disrnissed KCPA's procedural due process claims, but allowed the rest ofKCPA's claims
to proceed. On June 4, 2009, the MREC filed a Petition for Preliminary Injunction and
Permanent Injunction, asking the court to prohibit KepA from continuing any of its
business activities that, in the estirnation of the court, would constitute perfonning real
estate activities \vithout a license. The requested injunction alleges violations of § §
339.101.1(3), (4), (7), (8), and (10).
3. The MREC is responsible for administering and enforcing the statutes and
regulations relating to the licensing and practice of real estate brokers and salespersons,
pO'wers delegated through Chapter 339, RSMo. Ms. Lewis does not hold and has never
held a real estate broker or salesperson license issued by the MREC.
4. KCPA is internet based with several components, including a database of real
estate advertisements; a search function that allows interested members of the public to
vie\v only those advertisements that match criteria that they select thetnselves; an online
roommate Inatching service, a collection of useful infomlation about the advantages of
living in the Kansas City area; a blog and other social media outlets that allow owners or
tnanagers of rental properties to notify prospective renters of the availability of specials
that might othenvise escape the renters' notice. KepA enters into written agreements
\vith owners and nlanagers of rental property under which KCPA agrees to post on its
928826,1..6 : 01
A3
vOO® 17.9L9 ON £1:91 mlA\ 010Z/0C/90
vvebsite advertisements prepared and submitted by the property owners, managers, or
brokers working on their behalf. KCP A does 110t alter these advertiselllents once they
have been provided by the properties. The MREC did not prove that any of the property
advertiseJllents on the KCPA website were false or 111isleading. If a renter notifies the
o\vner or manager of a rental property with whom KCPA has an agreement that they
discovered the property through KCPA, KCPA is paid a percentage of the first Inonths
rent. The MREC did not prove that KCPA's rental advisors have conveyed any false or
misleading infomlation about specific rental units.
5. KCPA's business activities do not include collecting rents or security deposits
for owners.KCPA does not accept money directly from renters or prospective renters
and does not handle tenant complaints for o\vners or managers of rental properties.
KCPA does not properties to prospective renters through actual in person
inspection. It does not advertise or hold itself out as a licensed real estate broker or
salesperson. KCPA does not charge or accept advance fees for advertisenlents appearing
on the KCPA website.
6. Before KCPA began Ms. Lewis contacted both the Kansas Real
Estate Commission and the MREC to find out if state laws \vould require her business
to have a license. The Kansas commission responded that no license would be
necessary. A representative of the MREC responded that her proposed activities
occupied a "grey area" of the law. Ms. Lewis thereafter conlmenced business
operations with KepA.
9288262..6 : 01. 02:90 0t02-t0-lnr
A4
(7.9L9 O:\' nllX.L] £1 :91 (EU\ 0107.IOf:/90
7. In June of 2004, the MREC notified Ms. Lewis that her fornler elnployer had
filed a complaint alleging that KepA was unlawfully engaging in real estate
activities. On Decen1ber 26, 2006, the MREC announced its determination that
KCPA \vas violating the law. A letter signed by Janet Carder, the Executive Director
of the MREC, demanded that KCPA cease conducting real estate activity. On
January 25,2007. K,CPA's attorney, Timothy 1. Thompson, sent a well \vritten and
\vell reasoned letter to the MREC explaining why KCPA believed the law did not
apply to its business. On March 22, 2007, Kimberly Grinston, an attorney for the
MREC sent another letter stating that KCPA was violating § 339.010.1, which the
letter quoted. The letter specifically highlighted §§ 339.010.1(4), and (9), placing
these provisions in bold and italic font, but the letter did not specify any of KCPA's
business activities that it believed to violate these provisions. The letter specifically
advised KCPA that operating as a real estate broker or salesperson without a license
was a crirninal offense and it threatened to refer KepA's activities to the Missouri
Attorney General's Office and all applicable prosecuting authorities for official and
inlmediate legal action.
8. The commission did not direct Ms. Grinston to highlight the particular
provisions enlphasized in the cease-and-desist letter that bore her signature.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:
1. KCPA is nol exempt from the restrictions and requirenlents of Chapter 339.
2. Sections 339.010.1(3), (4), (7), (8), (9) and (10) are not unconstitutional under the
Missouri or U"nites States Constitution.
9288262..6 : 01
A5
r7.9L9 0,\1 nux.I.] 91:91 (ElM 0107./0£/90
3. The application of Sections 339.010.1(3), (4), (7), (8), (9), and (10) are not
facially unconstitutional under the Missouri or United States Constitution.
4. Sections 339.010.1(3), (4), (7), (8), (9)) and (10), are not unconstitutionally
overbroad.
5. Sections 339.010.1(3). (4), (7), (8), (9), and (10) are not unconstitutionally vague.
6. Section 339.010.6 is not unconstitutional.
7. KCPA is not excepted from the definition in Section 339.010.1 by any of the
exceptions in Section 339.010.6.
8. The Court finds that the application of Chapter 339 RSMo to the activities of
KCPA does not violate any section of the United States or Missouri Constitutions.
With regard to the request for Injunctive Relief by MREA the Court finds and
Orders as follows:
1. MREC has shown that KCPA has performed acts which require licensure
under Chapter 339, and KepA does not hold a Missouri real estate
license under Chapter 339, RSMo.
2. MREC has shown that there are grounds for an injunction restraining KCPA
fronl certain actions under the provisions of Section 339.180.1 (I), RSMo.
WHEREFORE IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
1. That until KCPA complies with the requirements of Chapt.er 339 applicable to
KCPA operations, KCPA is restrained and enjoined from:
9288261..6: 0 1 02:90 0102-10-inr
A6
LOO r7.9L9 ON nIlX.L] 5H : 91 (13M 0107. 10C 190
A. Contracting with property owners to receive cOlnpensation in return for
referring prospective tenants who rent from property which is
not an enforceable contract under the terms of Section 339.160, RSMo;
B. Any act requiring real estate licensure pursuant to the terms of Cja[ter
339 RSMo.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECRED:
That KCPA is restrained and enjoined from paying a reward or incentive to
tenants \.vho notifY property owners that they were directed to the property through
KCPA's services, which \vould violate Section 339.100.2(13) ifperfonned by a licensed
real estate broker.
All requests for relief not granted herein are denied. Costs are assessed
against KCP A.
Dated:
Judge I ;:, ({;,/30/;Z
9288262..6 : 01
A7
First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of
the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of
grievances.”
Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities
of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or
property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the
equal protection of the laws.
Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to
their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding
Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for
President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the
Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is
denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and
citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion,
or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion
which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens
twenty-one years of age in such State.
A8
Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of
President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United
States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of
Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or
as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United
States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or
comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each House,
remove such disability.
Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law,
including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing
insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any
State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or
rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave;
but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the
provisions of this article.
Article I, Section 2 of the Missouri Constitution
“That all constitutional government is intended to promote the general welfare of the
people; that all persons have a natural right to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness and
the enjoyment of the gains of their own industry; that all persons are created equal and
are entitled to equal rights and opportunity under the law; that to give security to these
things is the principal office of government, and that when government does not confer
A9
this security, it fails in its chief design.”
Article I, Section 8 of the Missouri Constitution
“That no law shall be passed impairing the freedom of speech, no matter by what means
communicated: that every person shall be free to say, write or publish, or otherwise
communicate whatever he will on any subject, being responsible for all abuses of that
liberty; and that in all suits and prosecutions for libel or slander the truth thereof may be
given in evidence; and in suits and prosecutions for libel the jury, under the direction of
the court, shall determine the law and the facts.”
Article I, Section 10 of the Missouri Constitution
“That no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.”
Article III, Section 40(30) of the Missouri Constitution
“The general assembly shall not pass any local or special law… where a general law can
be made applicable, and whether a general law could have been made applicable is a
judicial question to be judicially determined without regard to any legislative assertion on
that subject.”
Section 339.010, RSMo
§ 339.010. Definitions -- applicability of chapter
1. A "real estate broker" is any person, partnership, association, or corporation, foreign
or domestic who, for another, and for a compensation or valuable consideration, does, or
attempts to do, any or all of the following:
(1) Sells, exchanges, purchases, rents, or leases real estate;
(2) Offers to sell, exchange, purchase, rent or lease real estate;
A10
(3) Negotiates or offers or agrees to negotiate the sale, exchange, purchase, rental or
leasing of real estate;
(4) Lists or offers or agrees to list real estate for sale, lease, rental or exchange;
(5) Buys, sells, offers to buy or sell or otherwise deals in options on real estate or
improvements thereon;
(6) Advertises or holds himself or herself out as a licensed real estate broker while
engaged in the business of buying, selling, exchanging, renting, or leasing real estate;
(7) Assists or directs in the procuring of prospects, calculated to result in the sale,
exchange, leasing or rental of real estate;
(8) Assists or directs in the negotiation of any transaction calculated or intended to
result in the sale, exchange, leasing or rental of real estate;
(9) Engages in the business of charging to an unlicensed person an advance fee in
connection with any contract whereby the real estate broker undertakes to promote the
sale of that person's real estate through its listing in a publication issued for such purpose
intended to be circulated to the general public;
(10) Performs any of the foregoing acts on behalf of the owner of real estate, or interest
therein, or improvements affixed thereon, for compensation.
2. A "real estate salesperson" is any person who for a compensation or valuable
consideration becomes associated, either as an independent contractor or employee, either
directly or indirectly, with a real estate broker to do any of the things above mentioned.
The provisions of sections 339.010 to 339.180 and sections 339.710 to 339.860* shall not
be construed to deny a real estate salesperson who is compensated solely by commission
A11
the right to be associated with a broker as an independent contractor.
3. The term "commission" as used in sections 339.010 to 339.180 and sections 339.710 to
339.860* means the Missouri real estate commission.
4. "Real estate" for the purposes of sections 339.010 to 339.180 and sections 339.710 to
339.860* shall mean, and include, leaseholds, as well as any other interest or estate in
land, whether corporeal, incorporeal, freehold or nonfreehold, and the real estate is
situated in this state.
5. "Advertising" shall mean any communication, whether oral or written, between a
licensee or other entity acting on behalf of one or more licensees and the public, and shall
include, but not be limited to, business cards, signs, insignias, letterheads, radio,
television, newspaper and magazine ads, Internet advertising, web sites, display or group
ads in telephone directories, and billboards.
6. The provisions of sections 339.010 to 339.180 and sections 339.710 to 339.860* shall
not apply to:
(1) Any person, partnership, association, or corporation who as owner, lessor, or lessee
shall perform any of the acts described in subsection 1 of this section with reference to
property owned or leased by them, or to the regular employees thereof;
(2) Any licensed attorney-at-law;
(3) An auctioneer employed by the owner of the property;
(4) Any person acting as receiver, trustee in bankruptcy, administrator, executor, or
guardian or while acting under a court order or under the authority of a will, trust
instrument or deed of trust or as a witness in any judicial proceeding or other proceeding
A12
conducted by the state or any governmental subdivision or agency;
(5) Any person employed or retained to manage real property by, for, or on behalf of
the agent or the owner of any real estate shall be exempt from holding a license, if the
person is limited to one or more of the following activities:
(a) Delivery of a lease application, a lease, or any amendment thereof, to any person;
(b) Receiving a lease application, lease, or amendment thereof, a security deposit,
rental payment, or any related payment, for delivery to, and made payable to, a broker or
owner;
(c) Showing a rental unit to any person, as long as the employee is acting under the
direct instructions of the broker or owner, including the execution of leases or rental
agreements;
(d) Conveying information prepared by a broker or owner about a rental unit, a lease,
an application for lease, or the status of a security deposit, or the payment of rent, by any
person;
(e) Assisting in the performance of brokers' or owners' functions, administrative,
clerical or maintenance tasks;
(f) If the person described in this section is employed or retained by, for, or on behalf
of a real estate broker, the real estate broker shall be subject to discipline under this
chapter for any conduct of the person that violates this chapter or the regulations
promulgated thereunder;
(6) Any officer or employee of a federal agency or the state government or any political
subdivision thereof performing official duties;
A13
(7) Railroads and other public utilities regulated by the state of Missouri, or their
subsidiaries or affiliated corporations, or to the officers or regular employees thereof,
unless performance of any of the acts described in subsection 1 of this section is in
connection with the sale, purchase, lease or other disposition of real estate or investment
therein unrelated to the principal business activity of such railroad or other public utility
or affiliated or subsidiary corporation thereof;
(8) Any bank, trust company, savings and loan association, credit union, insurance
company, mortgage banker, or farm loan association organized under the laws of this
state or of the United States when engaged in the transaction of business on its own
behalf and not for others;
(9) Any newspaper, magazine, periodical, Internet site, Internet communications, or any
form of communications regulated or licensed by the Federal Communications
Commission or any successor agency or commission whereby the advertising of real
estate is incidental to its operation;
(10) Any developer selling Missouri land owned by the developer;
(11) Any employee acting on behalf of a nonprofit community, or regional economic
development association, agency or corporation which has as its principal purpose the
general promotion and economic advancement of the community at large, provided that
such entity:
(a) Does not offer such property for sale, lease, rental or exchange on behalf of
another person or entity;
(b) Does not list or offer or agree to list such property for sale, lease, rental or
A14
exchange; or
(c) Receives no fee, commission or compensation, either monetary or in kind, that is
directly related to sale or disposal of such properties. An economic developer's normal
annual compensation shall be excluded from consideration as commission or
compensation related to sale or disposal of such properties; or
(12) Any neighborhood association, as that term is defined in section 441.500, RSMo,
that without compensation, either monetary or in kind, provides to prospective purchasers
or lessors of property the asking price, location, and contact information regarding
properties in and near the association's neighborhood, including any publication of such
information in a newsletter, Internet site, or other medium.
Section 339.170, RSMo
§ 339.170. Penalty for violation
Any person or corporation knowingly violating any provision of sections 339.010 to
339.180 and sections 339.710 to 339.860 shall be guilty of a class B misdemeanor. Any
officer or agent of a corporation, or member or agent of a partnership or association, who
shall knowingly and personally participate in or be an accessory to any violation of
sections 339.010 to 339.180 and sections 339.710 to 339.860, shall be guilty of a class B
misdemeanor. This section shall not be construed to release any person from civil liability
or criminal prosecution under any other law of this state. The commission may cause
complaint to be filed for violation of section 339.020 in any court of competent
jurisdiction, and perform such other acts as may be necessary to enforce the provisions
hereof.
A15
Section 339.180, RSMo
1. It shall be unlawful for any person or entity not licensed under this chapter to perform
any act for which a real estate license is required. Upon application by the commission,
and the necessary burden having been met, a court of general jurisdiction may grant an
injunction, restraining order or other order as may be appropriate to enjoin a person or
entity from:
(1) Offering to engage or engaging in the performance of any acts or practices for which
a permit or license is required by this chapter upon a showing that such acts or practices
were performed or offered to be performed without a permit or license; or
(2) Engaging in any practice or business authorized by a permit or license issued pursuant
to this chapter upon a showing that the holder presents a substantial probability of serious
danger to the health, safety or welfare of any person with, or who is considering
obtaining, a legal interest in real property in this state.
2. Any such action shall be commenced either in the county in which such conduct
occurred or in the county in which the defendant resides.
3. Any action brought under this section shall be in addition to and not in lieu of any
penalty provided by this chapter and may be brought concurrently with other actions to
enforce this chapter.
Section 558.011, RSMo
§ 558.011. Sentence of imprisonment, terms--conditional release
1. The authorized terms of imprisonment, including both prison and conditional release
terms, are:
A16
(1) For a class A felony, a term of years not less than ten years and not to exceed thirty
years, or life imprisonment;
(2) For a class B felony, a term of years not less than five years and not to exceed fifteen
years;
(3) For a class C felony, a term of years not to exceed seven years;
(4) For a class D felony, a term of years not to exceed four years;
(5) For a class A misdemeanor, a term not to exceed one year;
(6) For a class B misdemeanor, a term not to exceed six months;
(7) For a class C misdemeanor, a term not to exceed fifteen days.
2. In cases of class C and D felonies, the court shall have discretion to imprison for a
special term not to exceed one year in the county jail or other authorized penal institution,
and the place of confinement shall be fixed by the court. If the court imposes a sentence
of imprisonment for a term longer than one year upon a person convicted of a class C or
D felony, it shall commit the person to the custody of the department of corrections for a
term of years not less than two years and not exceeding the maximum authorized terms
provided in subdivisions (3) and (4) of subsection 1 of this section.
3. (1) When a regular sentence of imprisonment for a felony is imposed, the court shall
commit the person to the custody of the department of corrections for the term imposed
under section 557.036, RSMo, or until released under procedures established elsewhere
by law.
(2) A sentence of imprisonment for a misdemeanor shall be for a definite term and the
court shall commit the person to the county jail or other authorized penal institution for
A17
the term of his or her sentence or until released under procedure established elsewhere by
law.
4. (1) A sentence of imprisonment for a term of years for felonies other than dangerous
felonies as defined in section 556.061, RSMo, and other than sentences of imprisonment
which involve the individual's fourth or subsequent remand to the department of
corrections shall consist of a prison term and a conditional release term. The conditional
release term of any term imposed under section 557.036, RSMo, shall be:
(a) One-third for terms of nine years or less;
(b) Three years for terms between nine and fifteen years;
(c) Five years for terms more than fifteen years; and the prison term shall be the
remainder of such term. The prison term may be extended by the board of probation and
parole pursuant to subsection 5 of this section.
(2) “Conditional release” means the conditional discharge of an offender by the board
of probation and parole, subject to conditions of release that the board deems reasonable
to assist the offender to lead a law-abiding life, and subject to the supervision under the
state board of probation and parole. The conditions of release shall include avoidance by
the offender of any other crime, federal or state, and other conditions that the board in its
discretion deems reasonably necessary to assist the releasee in avoiding further violation
of the law.
5. The date of conditional release from the prison term may be extended up to a
maximum of the entire sentence of imprisonment by the board of probation and parole.
The director of any division of the department of corrections except the board of
A18
probation and parole may file with the board of probation and parole a petition to extend
the conditional release date when an offender fails to follow the rules and regulations of
the division or commits an act in violation of such rules. Within ten working days of
receipt of the petition to extend the conditional release date, the board of probation and
parole shall convene a hearing on the petition. The offender shall be present and may call
witnesses in his or her behalf and cross-examine witnesses appearing against the
offender. The hearing shall be conducted as provided in section 217.670, RSMo. If the
violation occurs in close proximity to the conditional release date, the conditional release
may be held for a maximum of fifteen working days to permit necessary time for the
division director to file a petition for an extension with the board and for the board to
conduct a hearing, provided some affirmative manifestation of an intent to extend the
conditional release has occurred prior to the conditional release date. If at the end of a
fifteen-working-day period a board decision has not been reached, the offender shall be
released conditionally. The decision of the board shall be final.
20 CSR 2250-8.090
20 CSR 2250-8.090 Brokerage Service Agreements
PURPOSE: This rule requires that a listing agreement be in writing and that a copy of
the agreement be delivered to the owner before a broker may advertise or place a sign on
the property. The agreement must contain all terms, conditions, a definite expiration
date, and signatures of all parties. All information contained on the agreement shall be
carefully investigated for accuracy by the listing agent. In a cooperative listing, the
selling broker shall be presumed to be a subagent of the listing broker.
A19
(1) A licensee shall not advertise or place a sign upon any property offering it for sale or
lease to prospective customers without the written consent of the owner or his or her duly
authorized agent.
(2) A licensee shall not show residential property unless a broker holds a currently
effective written seller’s/lessor’s agency agreement, seller’s/lessor’s transaction
brokerage agreement, or other written authorization to show.
(3) In a commercial real estate transaction, a brokerage service agreement prepared by
legal counsel for the client/customer to be represented or assisted shall not be subject to
the provisions of 20 CSR 2250-8.090(4)-(7).
(4) Seller’s/Lessor’s Agency (Sale/Lease Listing) Agreement.
(A) Every written listing agreement or other written agreement for brokerage services
shall contain all of the following:
1. The price;
2. The commission to be paid (including any and all bonuses);
3. A definite beginning date;
4. An expiration date;
5. The licensee’s duties and responsibilities;
6. A statement which permits or prohibits the designated broker from offering subagency;
7. A statement which permits or prohibits the designated broker and/or affiliated licensee
from acting as a disclosed dual agent and if permitted, the duties and responsibilities of a
dual agent;
8. A statement which permits or prohibits the designated broker and/or affiliated licensee
A20
from acting as a transaction broker and if permitted, the duties and responsibilities of a
transaction broker;
9. Specification of whether or not the designated broker is authorized to cooperate with
and compensate other designated brokers acting pursuant to any other brokerage
relationship as defined by 339.710 to 339.860, RSMo, including but not limited to
buyer’s agents and/or transaction brokers;
10. A statement which confirms that the seller/lessor received the Broker Disclosure
Form prescribed by the commission: a) on or before the signing of the seller’s agency
agreement, or b) upon the licensee obtaining any personal or financial information,
whichever occurs first;
11. The signatures of all owners and the listing broker or listing agent as authorized by
the broker;
12. The type of listing;
13. The legal description or the complete street address of the property, which includes
the city where the property is located; or, in the absence of a legal description or address,
a clear description which unmistakably identifies the property; and
14. All other terms and conditions under which the property is to be sold, leased, or
exchanged.
(B) The agreement shall contain no provision requiring an owner to notify the broker of
intent to cancel the listing after the expiration date.
(C) Any addendums, riders, endorsements, attachments, or changes to the listing
agreement or other written agreement for brokerage services must contain the initials of
A21
all parties.
(D) The licensee shall give a legible copy of every written listing agreement or other
written agreement for brokerage services to the owner of the property at the time the
signature of the owner is obtained.
(E) A licensee shall not negotiate or enter into a brokerage service agreement with an
owner if the licensee knows, or has reason to know, that the owner has a written
unexpired exclusive brokerage service agreement as to the property with another broker,
unless the owner initiates the discussion and provided the licensee has not directly or
indirectly solicited the discussion, in which case the licensee may negotiate and enter into
an agreement which will take effect after the expiration of the current agreement.
(F) No licensee shall make or enter into a net listing agreement for the sale or lease of
real property or any interest in real property; this agreement is defined as one that
stipulates a net price to be received by the owner with the excess over that price to be
received by the broker as commission.
(G) A listing agreement or other written agreement for brokerage services may not be
assigned, sold, or otherwise transferred to another broker without the express written
consent of all parties to the original agreement.
(5) Buyer’s/Tenant’s Agency Agreement.
(A) Every written buyer or tenant authorization shall contain all of the following:
1. A description of the type of property sought by the buyer or tenant;
2. The commission or fee to be paid (including any and all bonuses);
3. A definite beginning date;
A22
4. An expiration date;
5. The licensee’s duties and responsibilities;
6. A statement which permits or prohibits the designated broker from offering subagency;
7. A statement which permits or prohibits the designated broker and/or affiliated licensee
from acting as a disclosed dual agent and if permitted, the duties and responsibilities of a
dual agent;
8. A statement which permits or prohibits the designated broker and/or affiliated licensee
from acting as a transaction broker and if permitted, the duties and responsibilities of a
transaction broker;
9. Specification of whether or not the designated broker is authorized to cooperate with
and compensate other designated brokers acting pursuant to any other brokerage
relationship as defined by 339.710 to 339.860, RSMo, including but not limited to
seller’s agents and/or transaction brokers;
10. A statement which confirms that the buyer received the Broker Disclosure Form
prescribed by the commission: a) on or before the signing of the buyer’s agency
agreement, or b) upon the licensee obtaining any personal or financial information,
whichever occurs first;
11. The signatures of the buyers or tenants and the broker or agent as authorized by the
broker;
12. The type of agreement; and
13. All other terms and conditions prescribed by the buyers or tenants.
(B) The agreement shall contain no provision requiring a buyer or tenant to notify the
A23
broker of intent to cancel the agreement after the expiration date.
(C) Any addendums, riders, endorsements, attachments, or changes to the agreement or
other written authorization must contain the initials of all parties.
(D) The licensee shall give a legible copy of every written agreement or other
authorization to the buyer or tenant at the time the signatures are obtained and a copy of
the written authorization shall be retained in the broker’s office.
(E) A licensee shall not negotiate or enter into a brokerage service agreement with a
buyer or tenant if the licensee knows, or has reason to know, that the buyer or tenant has
a written unexpired exclusive agreement with another broker, unless the buyer or tenant
initiates the discussion and provided the licensee has not directly or indirectly solicited
the discussion, in which case the licensee may negotiate and enter into an agreement
which will take effect after the expiration of the current agreement.
(F) A buyer or tenant agency agreement may not be assigned, sold, or otherwise
transferred to another broker without the express written consent of all parties to the
original buyer or tenant agency agreement.
(6) Transaction Brokerage Agreement Between Broker and Seller/Lessor.
(A) Every written seller’s or lessor’s transaction brokerage agreement shall contain all of
the following:
1. The price;
2. The commission to be paid (including any and all bonuses);
3. A definite beginning date;
4. An expiration date;
A24
5. The licensee’s duties and responsibilities;
6. The signatures of all owners and the broker or affiliated licensee as authorized by the
broker;
7. The type of agreement;
8. The legal description or the complete street address of the property, which includes the
city where the property is located; or, in the absence of a legal description or address, a
clear description which unmistakably identifies the property;
9. All other terms and conditions under which the property is to be sold, leased, or
exchanged;
10. Specification of whether or not the designated broker is authorized to cooperate with
and compensate other designated brokers acting pursuant to any other brokerage
relationship as defined by 339.710 to 339.860, RSMo, including but not limited to
buyer’s agents and/or other transaction brokers; and
11. A statement which confirms that the seller/lessor received the Broker Disclosure
Form prescribed by the commission: a) on or before the signing of the transaction
brokerage agreement, or b) upon the licensee obtaining any personal or financial
information, whichever occurs first.
(B) The agreement shall contain no provision requiring an owner to notify the broker of
intent to cancel the agreement after the expiration date.
(C) Any addendums, riders, endorsements, attachments, or changes to the agreement
must contain the initials of all parties.
(D) The licensee shall give a legible copy of every written agreement to the owner of the
A25
property at the time the signature of the owner(s) is obtained.
(E) A licensee shall not negotiate or enter into a brokerage service agreement with an
owner if the licensee knows, or has reason to know, that the owner has a written
unexpired exclusive brokerage service agreement as to the property with another broker,
unless the owner initiates the discussion and provided the licensee has not directly or
indirectly solicited the discussion, in which case the licensee may negotiate and enter into
an agreement which will take effect after the expiration of the current agreement.
(F) No licensee shall make or enter into a net agreement for the sale or lease of real
property or any interest in real property; this agreement is defined as one that stipulates a
net price to be received by the owner with the excess over that price to be received by the
broker as commission.
(G) Transaction brokerage agreements may not be assigned, sold, or otherwise
transferred to another broker without the express written consent of all parties to the
original transaction brokerage agreement.
(7) Transaction Brokerage Agreement Between Broker and Buyer/Tenant.
(A) Every written buyer’s or tenant’s transaction brokerage agreement shall contain all of
the following:
1. A description of the type of property sought by the buyer or tenant;
2. The commission or fee to be paid (including any and all bonuses);
3. A definite beginning date;
4. An expiration date;
5. The licensee’s duties and responsibilities;
A26
6. The signatures of the buyers or tenants and the broker or affiliated licensee as
authorized by the broker;
7. The type of agreement;
8. All other terms and conditions prescribed by the buyers or tenants;
9. Specification of whether or not the designated broker is authorized to cooperate with
and compensate other designated brokers acting pursuant to any other brokerage
relationship as defined by 339.710 to 339.860, RSMo, including but not limited to
seller’s agents and/or other transaction brokers; and
10. A statement which confirms that the buyer received the Broker Disclosure Form
prescribed by the commission: a) on or before the signing of the transaction brokerage
agreement, or b) upon the licensee obtaining any personal or financial information,
whichever occurs first.
(B) The agreement shall contain no provision requiring a buyer or tenant to notify the
broker of intent to cancel the agreement after the expiration date.
(C) Any addendums, riders, endorsements, attachments, or changes to the agreement
must contain the initials of all parties.
(D) The licensee shall give a legible copy of every written agreement or other
authorization to the buyer or tenant at the time the signatures are obtained and a copy of
the agreement shall be retained in the broker’s office.
(E) A licensee shall not negotiate or enter into a brokerage service agreement with a
buyer or tenant if the licensee knows, or has reason to know, that the buyer or tenant has
a written unexpired exclusive agreement with another broker, unless the buyer or tenant
A27
initiates the discussion and provided the licensee has not directly or indirectly solicited
the discussion, in which case the licensee may negotiate and enter into an agreement
which will take effect after the expiration of the current agreement.
(F) Transaction brokerage agreements may not be assigned, sold, or otherwise transferred
to another broker without the express written consent of all parties to the original
transaction brokerage agreement.
(8) Other Written Authorization. Written authorization to show residential property
without an agency agreement or transaction brokerage agreement with the owner/landlord
must contain all of the following:
(A) A definite beginning date;
(B) An expiration date;
(C) The signatures of all owners or landlords and the broker or licensee as authorized by
the broker;
(D) The legal description or the complete street address of the property, which includes
the city where the property is located; or, in the absence of a legal description or address,
a clear description which unmistakably identifies the property;
(E) Permission to enter and show the property;
(F) The commission or fee to be paid (including any and all bonuses);
(G) All other terms and conditions prescribed by the owners or landlords;
(H) Any addendums, riders, endorsements, attachments, or changes to the written
authorization must contain the initials of all parties; and
(I) A statement which confirms that the owner or landlord received the Broker Disclosure
A28
Form prescribed by the commission: a) on or before the signing of the other written
authorization, or b) upon the licensee obtaining any personal or financial information,
whichever occurs first.
(9) Every written property management agreement or other written authorization between
a broker and the owners of the real estate shall:
(A) Identify the property to be managed;
(B) State the amount of fee or commission to be paid and when the fee or commission
will be paid;
(C) Specify whether security deposits and prepaid rents will be held by the broker or the
owner;
(D) Contain the beginning date of the agreement;
(E) Provide the terms and conditions for termination of the property management
agreement by the broker or the owner of the property;
(F) Include the licensee’s duties and responsibilities;
(G) Contain a statement which permits or prohibits the designated broker from offering
subagency (not applicable for transaction broker agreements);
(H) Contain a statement which permits or prohibits the designated broker and/or affiliated
licensee from acting as a disclosed dual agent and if permitted, the duties and
responsibilities of a dual agent;
(I) Contain a statement which permits or prohibits the designated broker and/or affiliated
licensee from acting as a transaction broker and if permitted, the duties and
responsibilities of a transaction broker;
A29
(J) Include specification of whether or not the designated broker is authorized to
cooperate with and compensate other designated brokers acting pursuant to any other
brokerage relationship as defined by sections 339.710 to 339.860, RSMo, including but
not limited to tenant’s agents and/or transaction brokers;
(K) Contain a statement which confirms that the landlord received the Broker Disclosure
Form prescribed by the commission:
1. On or before the signing of the brokerage relationship agreement; or
2. Upon the licensee obtaining any personal or financial information, whichever occurs
first;
(L) Contain the signatures of all the owners and the broker or affiliated licensee as
authorized by the broker; and
(M) Any addendums, riders, endorsements, or attachments to the property management
agreement or other written authorization between a broker and the owners of the real
estate shall contain the signatures of all the owners and the broker or affiliated licensee as
authorized by the broker.
(10) The licensee shall give to the owner or the owner’s authorized agent a legible copy
of every written property management agreement or other written authorization at the
time the signature of the owner is obtained. The licensee’s broker shall retain a copy of
the written property management agreement or other written authorization and a signed
copy of any addendums, riders, endorsements, or attachments to the written property
management agreement or other written authorization.
A30
Plaintiff’s Trial Exhibit #6 (MREC Responses to Requested Stipulations)
While the Exhibit Index of the Trial Transcript shows that Plaintiff’s Exhibit #6
was “not offered,” it clearly was approved by Defendant’s counsel, Tr. at 8-10, and
admitted into evidence. Tr. at 297.
Stipulations to be Requested of MREC
1. When assuming their position on the Missouri Real Estate Commission (MREC),
every member took an oath “to support the Constitution of the United States and of this
State.”
The circumstances under which Commissioners take office are within the control of
the Governor’s office. Such an oath is required of all state officers by Article VII,
Section 11 of the Missouri Constitution.
2. Under § 339.170, “Any person or corporation knowingly violating any provision
of sections 339.010 to 339.180 and sections 339.710 to 339.860 shall be guilty of a class
B misdemeanor.”
Agreed.
3. Under § 558.011.1(6), a class B misdemeanor is punishable by imprisonment for
“a term not to exceed six months.”
Agreed.
A31
4. The injunction requested by the MREC seeks to prevent KCPA from engaging in
specified future communications or publications the MREC believes to be prohibited by
Chapter 39, but not to punish any past violations of Chapter 339.
Agreed.
5. The decision by the MREC to seek an injunction does not prevent it from seeking
to impose against KCPA and its rental advisors any criminal penalties authorized by §
339.170.
Agreed, although it has not been the practice of the MREC to file complaints
in Circuit Courts under this section and the MREC has not done so in at least
twenty years, if ever, as far as is known.
6. The injunction requested by the MREC seeks not to terminate all business
operations in which KCPA is currently involved, but to prohibit those aspects of its
business that, in the opinion of the MREC, violate Chapter 339.
Agreed, except that the injunction would apply to those aspects of the
business which violated Chapter 339 in the determination of the Court, not
the opinion of the MREC.
7. The injunction requested by the MREC seeks to prevent KCPA and its rental
advisors from publishing or otherwise communicating certain information related to the
availability of real estate for rent.
A32
Agreed, provided that the communications in question violate the provisions
of Chapter 339, RSMo.
8. The injunction requested by the MREC seeks to prevent KCPA and its rental
advisors from publishing or otherwise communicating information about specific rental
properties even if the information itself was produced by an authorized person, such as
one holding a license from the MREC or one exempted from the restrictions of Chapter
339.
Only agreed in part. The communications may be permitted if done in
accordance with Chapter 339 and MREC regulations under the supervision
of a licensed real estate broker. The fact that the communications might have
been written or produced by a licensed broker is not necessarily
determinative, if the communications are published by KCPA mixed with
those produced by owners, outside the supervision and approval of a licensed
broker.
9. The injunction requested by the MREC seeks to prevent KCPA and its rental
advisors from offering to members of the public information or opinions about specific
rental properties that KCPA or its rental advisors believe might fit the interests of those
members of the public, regardless of the truth or accuracy of that information or the
sincerity of those opinions.
Agreed.
A33
10. The injunction requested by the MREC seeks to prevent KCPA and its rental
advisors from engaging in “interactive communication with prospective tenants, whether
in person or through media including telephone, email, or written communications,
intended to communicate to that prospective tenant possible rental/leasing units,
providing advice to prospective tenants as to available rental/leasing units, or otherwise
assisting, directing, or negotiating the rental or leasing of real estate.”
Agreed.
11. The injunction requested by the MREC seeks to prevent KCPA and its rental
advisors from communicating with the owners or managers of real property “in person or
through any media… to [offer or] provide services in procuring, identifying, negotiating,
or assisting in the rental or leasing of real estate units.”
Agreed.
12. It is the position of the MREC that KCPA’s business activities would comply with
the provisions of Chapter 339 if the corporation and its principals obtained the proper
licensure.
Agreed as to most of the aspects of KCPA’s business. One central feature of
KCPA’s business model – the delivery of “Visa Cards” to tenants who lease
apartments and provide KCPA’s name to landlords – appears to constitute
“prizes, money, gifts or other valuable consideration as inducement to secure
A34
customers or clients to . . . lease . . . property when the awarding of such
prizes, money, gifts or other valuable consideration is conditioned upon the . .
. lease,” which licensed real estate professionals are prohibited from doing
under Section 339.100.2(13), RSMo.
13. The MREC does not allege that any specific information contained in the rental
property advertisements posted on the KCPA website was prepared by anyone other than
a broker or owner of the rental property advertised.
Agreed.
14. The MREC has no evidence that any specific information contained in the rental
property advertisements posted on the KCPA website was prepared by anyone other than
a broker or owner of the rental property advertised.
Agreed.
15. The MREC does not allege that any specific information contained in the rental
property advertisements posted on the KCPA website is false or misleading.
Agreed as to content of listings themselves. Some of the statements of KCPA
itself, as itemized in the MREC’s response to Interrogatory No. 10 of KCPA’s
second First Set of Interrogatories (served March 26, 2010), which is
incorporated herein by reference, constitute claims as to its authority and
competence which the MREC believes are false or misleading. However,
A35
MREC does not have information indicating that any of the property
advertisements on the website are false or misleading.
16. The MREC has no evidence that any of the information about specific rental units
advertised on the KCPA website is false or misleading.
See response to Stipulation No. 15.
17. The MREC does not allege that any specific information provided by one of
KCPA’s rental advisors to a member of the public was false or misleading.
Agreed that no false or misleading information was alleged, because MREC
did not have access to any information provided by KCPA Rental Advisors to
members of the public until such information was provided late in the
discovery process.
18. The MREC has no evidence that any information about specific rental units
conveyed by one of KCPA’s rental advisors to a member of the public was false or
misleading.
Agreed that no false or misleading information about specific rental units has
been identified in the information made available to MREC. Some
statements of KCPA Rental Advisory may be false or misleading as to their
legal authority to perform services they stated they could do.
A36
19. The MREC does not allege that it expects Missouri citizens to suffer any specific,
quantifiable harm if KCPA or similar organizations are permitted to continue offering
truthful, non-misleading information about real estate available for rent.
Not agreed. To the extent services performed by KCPA violate the law
requiring licensure to perform real estate brokerage services, harm to the
public, to potential clients and consumers, and to licensed professionals may
result. MREC does not intend to plead or prove any specific harm, but will
not stipulate that such conduct is not inherently harmful or that specific,
quantifiable harm is not expected.
20. The MREC has no evidence tending to suggest that Missouri citizens are likely to
suffer any specific, quantifiable harm if KCPA and its rental advisors are permitted to
continue offering truthful, non-misleading information about real estate available for rent.
See response to No. 19, above.
21. The MREC does not allege that, separate from the communications and
publications it seeks to enjoin, any particular owner or manager whose properties are
advertised on the KCPA website would be legally prohibited from entering into rental
agreements with members of the public.
MREC does not allege and does not intend to offer proof that any legally
prohibited practices have taken place, but cannot stipulate that such conduct
A37
did not occur.
22. The MREC has no evidence that, separate from the communications and
publications it seeks to enjoin, any particular owner or manager whose properties are
advertised on the KCPA website has violated any law by entering into rental agreements
with members of the public.
MREC does not allege and does not intend to offer proof that any legally
prohibited practices have taken place, but cannot stipulate that such conduct
did not occur.
23. For the purposes of this case, it is the position of the MREC that Chapter 339’s
restrictions on the communication and publication of real estate information are
necessary to protect the state’s interest in guaranteeing that such information is only
distributed by persons or entities that have demonstrated that they are of “good moral
character; bear a good reputation for honesty, integrity, and fair dealing; and are
competent to transact the business of a broker or salesperson in such a manner as to
safeguard the interest of the public”; and to ensure that those entrusted with the
communication and publication of such real estate commission may be disciplined for
various forms of misconduct.
Agreed.
24. For the purposes of this case, it is the position of the MREC that § 339.010.1(4):
A38
a. forbids unauthorized persons from making any list of real estate for sale,
lease, rental or exchange, regardless of whether it is published or otherwise
communicated for the consideration of any other person.
The term “unauthorized persons” supports an inference that the activity is
inherently illegal. A better term would be “unlicensed.” To the extent
that this stipulation is applies to unlicensed persons, such practices are
illegal only if done for another and for compensation or valuable
consideration.
b. permits unauthorized persons to make a list of real estate for sale, lease,
rental or exchange, so long as it is not published or otherwise
communicated for the consideration of any other person.
The term “unauthorized persons” supports an inference that the activity is
inherently illegal. A better term would be “unlicensed.” To the extent
that this stipulation is applies to unlicensed persons, agreed.
c. prohibits unauthorized persons from publishing or communicating any
notice that a particular piece of real estate is available for sale, lease, rental
or exchange, even if the information communicated was prepared by a third
party.
The term “unauthorized persons” supports an inference that the activity is
A39
inherently illegal. A better term would be “unlicensed.” To the extent
that this stipulation is applies to unlicensed persons, such practices are
illegal only if done for another and for compensation or valuable
consideration.
25. The MREC has not published any formal definition of what it means to “list” real
estate for sale, lease, rental or exchange, as that word is used in § 339.010.1(4).
Agreed.
26. No representative of the MREC has the authority to advise a citizen whether a
particular communication or publication about real estate has violated or would risk
violating § 339.010.1(4) without the MREC first taking a vote on the communication or
publication in question.
MREC representatives and staff may not give legal advice, nor make
statements binding on the MREC. MREC staff do provide a certain amount
of information to the public, such as advising inquirers of the existence of
statutes and regulations addressing their questions and directing them to the
language of those laws, providing information from MREC directives and
public policy statements, and directing inquirers to resources from which
their questions may be answered.
27. For the purposes of this case, it is the position of the MREC that § 339.010.1(7):
A40
a. forbids any unauthorized person from communicating to another the
availability of real estate for sale, exchange, leasing or rental, regardless of
any agreement between the unauthorized person and the owner or manager
of the real estate in question.
The term “unauthorized persons” supports an inference that the activity is
inherently illegal. A better term would be “unlicensed.” To the extent
that this stipulation is applies to unlicensed persons, such practices are
illegal only if done for another and for compensation or valuable
consideration.
b. forbids unauthorized persons from communicating to another the
availability of real estate for sale exchange, leasing or rental, only if the
communication is made as the result of an agreement between the
unauthorized person and the owner or manager of the real estate in
question.
MREC is unable to respond to this request due to uncertainty about what
the “only if” language of the proposed stipulation is intended to mean.
c. forbids unauthorized persons from taking any steps to draw the attention of
the general public to information communicating the availability of real
estate for sale exchange, leasing or rental, even if that information is
A41
passively presented (as in a newsprint advertising flyer that might be placed
at the entrance to an area business).
The term “unauthorized persons” supports an inference that the activity is
inherently illegal. A better term would be “unlicensed.” To the extent
that this stipulation is applies to unlicensed persons, such practices are
illegal only if done for another and for compensation or valuable
consideration. In addition, the presentation of advertising is permissible if
the advertising is “incidental” to the presenter’s operations. See Section
339.010.6(9).
28. The MREC has not published any official definition of what it means to “procure a
prospect calculated to result in the sale, exchange, leasing or rental of real estate” as that
phrase is used in § 339.010.1(7).
Agreed.
29. No representative of the MREC has the authority to advise a citizen whether a
particular communication or publication has violated or would risk violating §
339.010.1(7) without the MREC first taking a vote on the communication or publication
in question.
MREC representatives and staff may not give legal advice, nor make
statements binding on the MREC. MREC staff do provide a certain amount
A42
of information to the public, such as advising inquirers of the existence of
statutes and regulations addressing their questions and directing them to the
language of those laws, providing information from MREC directives and
public policy statements, and directing inquirers to resources from which
their questions may be answered.
30. The MREC has not published any official definition of what it means to negotiate
“any transaction calculated or intended to result in the sale, exchange, leasing or rental of
real estate” as that phrase is used in § 339.010.1(8).
Agreed.
31. No representative of the MREC has the authority to advise a citizen whether a
particular communication or publication has violated or risks violating § 339.010.1(8)
without the MREC first taking a vote on the communication or publication in question.
MREC representatives and staff may not give legal advice, nor make
statements binding on the MREC. MREC staff do provide a certain amount
of information to the public, such as advising inquirers of the existence of
statutes and regulations addressing their questions and directing them to the
language of those laws, providing information from MREC directives and
public policy statements, and directing inquirers to resources from which
their questions may be answered.
A43
32. For the purposes of this case, it is the position of the MREC that § 339.010.1(8):
a. forbids unauthorized persons from serving as a conduit of information
between prospective renters or purchasers of real estate and the owners or
managers of that real estate, if and only if the unauthorized person attempts
to influence the terms under which the parties might reach an agreement as
to the terms of a real estate transaction.
b. forbids unauthorized persons from serving as a conduit of information
between prospective renters or purchasers of real estate and the owners or
managers of that real estate if the purpose of communicating that
information is to reach mutually agreeable terms for a transaction,
regardless of whether the unauthorized person is attempting to influence the
position taken by either party regarding the potential terms of such a real
estate transaction.
c. forbids unauthorized persons from serving as a conduit of information
between prospective renters or purchasers of real estate and the owners or
managers of that real estate if the communication of that information might
lead to the “sale, exchange, leasing or rental of real estate.”
These proposed stipulations are drawn with such complex, ambiguous, and
confusing language that MREC declines to stipulate to them. The MREC has
not adopted a detailed definition of what is involved in the process of
“negotiation,” and applies that definition on a case by case basis. It has not
A44
made the kind of detailed findings which this stipulation seems to be seeking.
As an unlicensed entity, KCPA cannot “assist or direct in the negotiation of
any transaction calculated or intended to result in the . . . leasing or rental of
real estate,” in the ordinary meanings of those words.
33. For the purposes of this case, it is the position of the MREC that it will not vote on
whether any particular communication or publication would violate any particular
provision of Chapter 339 unless in response to a complaint filed about that
communication or publication, or a complaint about the person or organization that
issued the communication or publication.
Not agreed. The MREC acts on information from a variety of sources, not all
of which comes directly from complaints. However, MREC must also make
decisions about how finite resources for investigation and enforcement will be
employed, and rejects any claim that the fact that a particular situation has
not been addressed represents a determination that there has been
compliance with the law in that situation or that the conduct in that situation
could not be addressed in the future. There can be a variety of reasons why a
situation involving potentially illegal conduct has not been addressed,
including but not limited to that the situation has not been brought to the
MREC’s attention; that there are evidentiary or practical reasons why
enforcement would not be effective; and that the conduct has not been
pursued as a matter of priority decisions.
A45
34. The MREC has no evidence that KCPA or its rental advisors have attempted to
influence the terms under which owners or managers of rental property and prospective
renters might enter into an agreement to rent or lease the property.
Not agreed. In email messages turned over in discovery, one rental advisor
makes statements which appear to encourage the prospective renter to
negotiate a “very good deal.”
35. The MREC has no evidence that KCPA is “engaging in the business of charging
an advance fee in connection with any contract whereby it undertakes to promote the sale
of that person’s real estate through its listing in a publication issued for such purpose
intended to be circulated to the general public” as that phrase is used in § 339.010.1(9).
Agreed.
36. The MREC has not published any official definition of what it means for a person
not licensed by the MREC to be “retained to manage real property by, for, or on behalf of
the agent or the owner of any real estate” as that phrase is used in § 339.010.6(5).
Agreed.
37. No representative of the MREC has the authority to advise a citizen whether they
meet the exemption established in § 339.010.6(5) without the MREC first taking a vote
on that question.
A46
MREC representatives and staff may not give legal advice, nor make
statements binding on the MREC. MREC staff do provide a certain amount
of information to the public, such as advising inquirers of the existence of
statutes and regulations addressing their questions and directing them to the
language of those laws, providing information from MREC directives and
public policy statements, and directing inquirers to resources from which
their questions may be answered.
38. The MREC has not published any official definition of what it means for the
advertising of real estate to be “incidental” to the operation of a “newspaper, magazine,
periodical, Internet site, Internet communications, or any form of communications
regulated or licensed by the Federal Communications Commission” as that phrase is used
in § 339.010.6(9).
Agreed.
39. No representative of the MREC has the authority to advise a citizen whether they
meet the exemption established in § 339.010.6(9) without the MREC first taking a vote
on that question.
MREC representatives and staff may not give legal advice, nor make
statements binding on the MREC. MREC staff do provide a certain amount
of information to the public, such as advising inquirers of the existence of
statutes and regulations addressing their questions and directing them to the
A47
language of those laws, providing information from MREC directives and
public policy statements, and directing inquirers to resources from which
their questions may be answered.
40. For the purposes of this case, it is the position of the MREC that the advertising of
real estate is “incidental” to the operation of a “newspaper, magazine, periodical, Internet
site, Internet communications, or any form of communications regulated or licensed by
the Federal Communications Commission” when:
a. The advertising of real estate accounts for XX% of the revenue generated
by the business.
b. The advertising of real estate accounts for XX% of the time spent by
employees or contractors of the business.
c. The advertising of real estate is part of the job description of XX% of the
employees or contractors of the business.
d. The advertising of real estate makes up XX% of the information conveyed
by the media produced by the business.
The MREC has never adopted a definition of “incidental” which incorporates
factors such as these.
41. For the purposes of this case, it is the position of the MREC that it will not vote on
whether any person or organization meets one of the exemptions provided by Chapter
339 unless in response to a complaint filed about that person or organization.
A48
As noted in the response to Stipulation No. 33, above, which is incorporated
in this answer, the MREC acts on information from a variety of sources and
is not limited to information coming from complaints. Decisions as to
whether any particular exception applies is one of many factors which the
MREC must consider in its determinations as to any particular situation
which comes before it, and such determinations are made on a case-by-case
basis depending on the facts of the situation before it.
42. It is possible that rental advisors hired by KCPA might provide prospective tenants
a range of information about the Kansas City area that would not fall within the
prohibitions of set out in Chapter 339.
Some of the activities offered by KCPA can be performed by unlicensed
persons. Some specific examples are identified in the response to
Interrogatory No. 5 of KCPA’s second First Set of Interrogatories (served
March 26, 2010), which is incorporated herein by reference.
43. While the MREC believes that part of the information offered by KCPA’s rental
advisors falls within the prohibitions set out in Chapter 339, none of the chapter’s
provisions specifically prohibits the practice of making rental advisors available to the
public.
Not agreed. While the statute does not employ the term “rental advisors,” the
fact that unlicensed persons may be “advising” prospective tenants and
A49
members of the public as to potential rental or lease transactions is clearly
within the scope of the statute.
44. For the purposes of this case, it is the position of the MREC that none of the
statutes cited in the MREC’s request for an injunction prohibits KCPA from giving
renters a $100 reward card if the renters tell the owners or managers of their rental
property that they discovered the property after visiting the KCPA website.
Not agreed. If a similar approach were employed by a licensed real estate
professional or association, there would be cause for discipline under Section
339.100.2(13), RSMo. for offering “prizes, money, gifts or other valuable
consideration as inducement to secure customers or clients to . . . lease . . .
property when the awarding of such prizes, money, gifts or other valuable
consideration is conditioned upon the . . . lease.” If a person performing a
certain service legally is prohibited from doing certain things in connection
with that service, it stands to reason that a person performing the same
service illegally is equally prohibited from doing so.
45. The MREC has no evidence that any property owner has been required to pay for
advertising on the KCPA website unless a qualified resident rented an advertised property
and notified the landlord that they learned of the availability through KCPA.
Agreed, as far as MREC knows.
A50
46. For the purposes of this case, it is the position of the MREC that, so long as they
avoided making any false or misleading statement, nothing in Chapter 339 would prevent
“any licensed attorney-at-law” from communicating to the general public precisely the
same information that the requested injunction would prohibit KCPA or its rental
advisors from providing.
There is an exception for attorneys-at-law under Section 339.010.6(2), but the
MREC has not been presented with and determined this precise issue.
47. For the purposes of this case, it is the position of the MREC that, so long as they
avoided making any false or misleading statement, nothing in Chapter 339 would prevent
“any licensed attorney-at-law” from offering information about real estate in the Kansas
City area, even if the attorney in question had never been to the Kansas City area and had
no special knowledge about the real estate in question.
There is an exception for attorneys-at-law under Section 339.010.6(2), but the
MREC has not been presented with and determined this precise issue.
48. It is the position of the MREC that only those who hold licenses from the MREC
or are otherwise exempt from the provisions of Chapter 339 may hold themselves out to
the public as “experts on Kansas City” or “veterans within the apartment community.”
Not agreed. The issue is not with the claims that were made, but the use that
was made of them – i.e., to encourage members of the public to employ
A51
KCPA’s services in arranging transactions for the rental of real estate, for
another and for compensation or valuable consideration. The proposed
stipulation would apply to a much broader range of situations.
49. None of the positions that the MREC has taken for the purpose of this case
regarding the interpretation or application of specific provisions of Chapter 339 is
binding on the MREC in regard to any other set of facts.
It is true, as a general rule, that no action the MREC takes in one case is
“binding” on the MREC in any other situation involving similar but not
identical facts. The MREC strives for consistency in its determinations, but
there are often subtle differences between apparently similar situations, and
different facts may lead to a different result.