Katrina Malinski Portfolio 2015

KATRINA MALINSKIPORTFOLIO

I am currently in my fourth year of Architecture at the University of Waterloo.

I have studied and worked in several amazing places, including London, Toronto, Lund and Berlin.

When I am not busy studying architecture, I love to take photos of old things, bicycle and climb around on rooftops.

I would love to talk to you in either English or French, and I am trying very hard to get better at German.

e-mail: [email protected]: katrina.malinskihttp://issuu.com/kmalinski/docs/portfolio

ABOUT ME...

CONTACT

21 Bathurst St. 8LTH Campus Revitalization 14Amphibious Housing 18Evolve Competition 22 Post Fordist Farm 26

Nageli Architekten 32FAR Frohn&Rojas 36ERA Architects Inc 40

CONTENTS

ACADEMIC EXPERIENCE 6

CURRICULUM VITAE 4

WORK EXPERIENCE 30

PHOTOGRAPHY 44

CURRICULUM VITAE

EDUCATIONCandidate for Bachelor of Architectural Studies, Honours University of Waterloo School of Architecture, Cambridge, ON, 2011 - present

Ontario Secondary School Diploma, 2011Lockerby Composite School STEP Program Graduate

WORK EXPERIENCE

Internship January to August 2015 Naegeli Architekten, Berlin, Germany

Internship May to August 2014 FAR frohn&rojas, Berlin, Germany

Student Intern September to December 2013 ERA Architects Inc., Toronto, Ontario

Architectural Intern January to April 2013 Smith Brooke Architects, London, UK

Construction Coordinator - Summer Student - May to August 2012 Moreau Industrial, Raglan Mine, Nunavik, Quebec

Science Demonstrator October 2007 to August 2011Science North, Sudbury, ON

AWARDS AND SPECIAL PROGRAMS

Exchange Student at Lund University Studied Urban Design (Sept-Dec 2014)

ONE Prize 2013 Top 20 Finalist

3C Comprehensive Coastal Communities Competition Top 32 Finalist

Deans Honours List

Waterloo Architecture Design and Energy Award

Outstanding Female Graduate Award 2011

ACADEMICEXPERIENCE

Candidate for:

Bachelor of Architectural StudiesUniversity of WaterlooCambridge, ON, 2011 - present

Exchange Student at Lund University Urban Design Masters ProgramSept-Dec 2014

Ontario Secondary School Diploma, 2011Lockerby Composite School STEP Program Graduate

21 BATHURST ST

HOUSING13000 m

HOTEL15000 m

RESTAURANT & BAR150 m

BANQUET HALL700 mPOOL

1400 m

RETAIL1200 m

OFFICE & CAFE2000 m

BUILT

OPEN

RESIDENTIAL

HOTEL

PRIVATE

PUBLIC

BUILT

OPEN

RESIDENTIAL

HOTEL

PRIVATE

PUBLIC

3A Design Studio University of WaterlooProf: Phillip Beesley, Mona El-Khafif

Dealing with contemporary issues such as increasing land pressures in urban areas and privatization of public space, 21 Bathurst Street seeks to find within the typology of the podium tower a way for an active and generous ground plane to accomodate the need for high density development.

Situated within a newly developed condo city of privately owned high rises, the scheme seeks to both blend in an maintain an entirely different ethos, opening up and inviting in rather than enclosing, and reaching out into the city in a bid to break down the barrier between the individual tower and its urban context. A generous public walkway across the site connects to a larger network of park in neighbourhood, while projecting out allows users to interact with a raised expressway that is a icon of the city. The tower seeks to propose new possibilities for interacting with the changing city that surrounds it, while providing a suitable spaces for the many programs it contains.

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

THIRD FLOOR PLAN

FOURTH FLOOR PLAN

ABOVE: Views illustrating the two ways by with which the building interacts with the city, both by bringing the city through the building by means of a pedestrian walkway through the site and bringing the users into the city, by allowing views previously unexplored. In this case a view directly from the bar onto an elevated high speed motorway.

RIGHT: Illustration of the types of residential groupings and the placement of the units within. This configuration

is based on a group of apartments (12-14) sharing a triple height atrium space containing a variety of communal spaces, allowing each cluster to share semi-public spaces between the residents. This is also encouraged by the double sided balconies in each unit, which can open both to the corridor in foul weather and to the outside in fair weather. The complex stacking of apartments ensures that a large variety of apartments exist on each floor, while also

providing the maximum opportunities for cross ventilation and solar exposure, making each grouping a diverse and lively neighbourhood on its own.

3 BEDROOOM

2 BEDROOOM

1 BEDROOOM

BACHELOR

LTH CAMPUS REVITALIZATIONASBN02 Sustainable Urban Recycling Lund University, SwedenProf: Louise Lvenstierne

Working within the existing Modernist campus of the Lund University engineering department, this project is a proposal for urban recycling, aiming to enhance the use of the campus both for the students and for the residents of the surrounding neighbourhoods. How can new additions to the campus respect the existing flows and patterns created by the modernist architecture, while fixing some of their deficits? What degree of intervention is necessary, even desired? What are the features on campus worthy of being saved, what can be let go or improved?

After careful analysis of the existing condition of the campus, a clear area of focus emerged. Many issues with the campus stem from the difficulty of navigating it. By establishing a hierarchy of circulation and using the existing north south bike and pedestrian route as a spine, many of these issues can be addressed. Having a major arterial route not only improves navigation, but could also be used to highlight high quality spaces currently underused, allowing both students and the larger public to discover the spaces that the campus has to offer.

Working with existing flows a new language of pathways was developed, centering on a major transportation hub. Replacing the existing monotonous asphalt paths with ones of varied width texture and functionality helps expand the possibilities of what can take place on the campus. Instead of a means of getting from point A to point B, walking through the campus could also mean finding a place to sit, a place to play or a place to meet, while still allowing the existing flows of bikes, pedestrians and buses to co-exist peacefully.

AMPHIBIOUS HOUSINGONE Prize Competition entry University of WaterlooProf: Elizabeth English

5 ft (1.5m) Static ElevationNo change in permenent elevation

15 ft (4.5m) Static Elevation+10 ft ( 3m) in permanent elevation

Amphibious Foundation+ 3 ft (1m) in permanent elevation+ 20 ft (6m) Rises with floodwaters

A Resiliency Strategy for the community of Ocean Beach Fire Island, this retrofit amphibious system allows houses to rise to meet incoming storm surges. For a small community comprised of vacation homes with few permanent residents, the suggested flood mitigation method of permanent static elevation, especially to the suggested 16 feet (almost 5 m), would be devastating to the fabric of the community. Hurricane Sandy as well as Hurricane Irene before that caused substantial flood damage to

the area, including the loss of several homes and have led to the need for a more flexible and adaptive solution to flood resiliency. Amphibious architecture is architecture that sits on land most of the time but is capable of floating in the event of a flood. It is a dynamic solution that would be well suited to a community such as Ocean Beach where storm surge heights are unpredictable and many of the homes are continually damaged by frequent storm surges.

5 ft (1.5m) Static ElevationNo change in permenent elevation

15 ft (4.5m) Static Elevation+10 ft ( 3m) in permanent elevation

Amphibious Foundation+ 3 ft (1m) in permanent elevation+ 20 ft (6m) Rises with floodwaters

EXISTING HOUSE

EXISTING DECK

LEAF SPRING

PONTOON CONNECTORS

PONTOONS

FRP TRUSS

PIVOT

VERTICAL GUIDANCE POSTS

EXISTING FOUNDATIONS

FRP GUIDANCE SLEEVES

FLOOR JOISTS

EXISTING HOME

EXISTING FOUNDATION

FLOTATION SYSTEM

SHOCK ABSORBING GUIDANCE SYSTEM

The proposal is a retrofit system; this only requires the home to be raised minimally to accommodate an alternative foundation. This foundation is what allows the home to float during a storm. The flood resilience of the existing houses can be substantially increased proactively in order to accommodate for a likely increase in storm surges. The home can rise as high as required in order to stay above the water, potentially higher than a permanently elevated home, and then settle

back down after the surge. The system has a built in shock absorbing system similar to that of a truck suspension in order to cope with the challenging issue of highly unpredictable waves during storms. While the home would not be habitable during storm surges, the amphibious foundations would allow the community to recover from storms much faster and substantially reduce damage in the likely event of increasingly large storm surges.

The sequence of installation for an amphibious foundation would be very similar to that used to permanently elevate a house. The house is raised mechanically, new foundations are installed and the house is then lowered back down. Due to soil conditions, most houses in Ocean Beach have wood pile foundations, which can be re-used by the amphibious foundation, eliminating the need for a new foundation when the house is static.

1. The existing home is raised using cribbing above the existing wood pile foundations. Fibreglass Reinforced Plastic sleeves for the guidance system are inserted into the ground beside the foundation.

2. A Truss system is installed underneath the existing home in order to reinforce the existing joists and the entire assembly is lowered back down onto the existing wood foundations.

3. Plastic pontoons are attached to the underside of the house in order to provide the buoyancy that makes the house float.

4. A wood deck and skirt covers the amphibious system and provides additional living space outside. The wood deck does not rise alongside the house and would need to be repaired following each storm.

1.

2.

3.

4.

EVOLVE COMPETITION3A Design Studio University of Waterloo

With: Edward Wang, Allegra Frisen, Brianna Cartwright, Sahar Tolami

Parans Fibre Optic Daylighting System captures sunlight on roof to be distributed in the interior.

Piezoelectric Wind Stalk Generation System captures wind energy on roof to create electricity.

Rainwater Roof Collection System and cistern provide supplementary water for toilet use when available.

Operable windows and roof vents facilitate stack effect ventilation for passive cooling.

Photovoltaic panels and photovoltaic windows generate electricity on the West, South and East facades.

Deep Loop Geothermal System provides 75% of heating and cooling needs through heat exchange.

Daylight

Wind Stalk

Rainwater

Ventilation

Photovoltaic

Geothermal

Fiber Optic Daylighting

Wind Stalks

Rainwater Collection

Passive Ventilation

Photovoltaic Energy

Geothermal Energy

A competition entry to design a net zero bank, the building combines both high and low tech strategies to minimise its environmental impact. Combining passive and active technologies, it integrates environmental techniques through many of the building systems, creating not only a more environmental building but also a warm and welcoming atmosphere. The building uses a two part method for achieving net zero. First, energy consumption is reduced by proper orientation, high R value insulation and the use of passive and active technologies such as natural ventila tion, day lighting and a geothermal heating and cooling system. Second, the building is oriented north south, allowing the south face to be maximised for windows and photo voltaic cladding. Few windows on the north side and airtight construction allow the building to retain its heat, reducing the heating load.

Rainwater Use Rainwater Available

Monthly Rainwater Available/Use (L)

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50Photovoltaic Electricity Production (MWh)

J F M A M J J A S O N D

J F M A M J J A S O N D

0

SouthEast & West

10000

20000

30000

40000

Parans Daylighting Systemsolar tracking panel

Carbon fiber stalkPiezoelectric sensorElectronics casing

L bracket 2.5 mm steel plate100 x 50 mm channels in airspacePeel and stick waterproof membrane50 mm rigid insulation14 mm steel decking300 mm deep steel truss joist w. spray-foam insulation12.5 mm furring strips in air space13 mm gypsum board w. vapour barrier behind

+-

TC

Energy generation using both solar and piezoelectric systems produces the remaining energy for the building to power itself. Building integrated photo voltaic cells on the south, east and west facades produce 20017 kWh yearly. Water consumption is also reduced through the use of high efficiency fixtures and the collection of rainwater which can be used in toilets.

The swaying motion of the carbon fiber stalks on the roof is converted into electricity by piezoelectric strips and produces 676 kWh over a year. Overall, no single strategy accounts for the net zero status of the building; the integration of multiple techniques and technologies is what allows the building to produce an energy surplus.

Waterproof Cover

Transducer Circuit

Piezoelectric Sensor

Connecting Wires

Steel Plate

Carbon Fiber Stalk

Steel C Channel

workerfarmer

family

Neighbours

housemates

Neighbours

family

Neighbours

Site Residents

Local Community

1950s 1980s 2000s

farmland amalgamation3 Largest crops Other cropsMANIFESTO

Barnproduction space

educat

ion

The development of the site proposes an agricultural cooperative designed to respond to the challenges faced by farmers in a post-fordist envi-ronment. Key trends that have been identified in regards to post-Fordism and agriculture include the increase of foreign temporary labour in agriculture and a shift from economies of scale (mass production of food items) to smaller and more fragmented economies of scope (localised, specialist markets). Operating as a land cooperative, the site will offer housing to 8 farmers and their families operating small scale agriculture and animal husbandry related businesses on the site. In addition to a townhouse style home, each farmer will be allocated space in the agricul-tural buildings in order to carry out their operations. The scheme of the farm reverses the fordist practice currently in place of large scale mono-crop farms, instead using historical precedents of pre-industrial communal farms to create a flexible model allowing for the production of multi-ple products on the same site while allowing farmers to adjust production based on market demands. Additionally, the site will include 96 spaces for temporary agricultural workers, organised into 8, 12 bedroom units with communal cooking and recreation facilities. This type of housing addresses a need for post-fordist farming scheme to recognise that temporary imported labour is an critical part of agricultural produc-tion in north America. The unique conditions of these workers will be addressed, notably their isolation from the larger population due to lan-guage barriers and temporality as well as the need for alternate social interactions to replace the standard family unit.

Site and community networks

production layout

SawP

20,000 per year 8 months per year planting and harvesting

(Seasonal Agricultural Workers Program)

mexico, jamaica, barbados, trinidad

20,000 per year up to 2 years any low skill labour

worldwide, mostly guatemala, phillipines, thailand

standard contract labour laws do not apply

negotiated contractlabour laws do not apply

TFW pilot(temporary foreign workers - agriculture stream)

Canadian agricultural worker porgrams

workerfarmer

family

Neighbours

housemates

Neighbours

family

Neighbours

Site Residents

Local Community

1950s 1980s 2000s

farmland amalgamation3 Largest crops Other cropsMANIFESTO


educat

ion

The development of the site proposes an agricultural cooperative designed to respond to the challenges faced by farmers in a post-fordist envi-ronment. Key trends that have been identified in regards to post-Fordism and agriculture include the increase of foreign temporary labour in agriculture and a shift from economies of scale (mass production of food items) to smaller and more fragmented economies of scope (localised, specialist markets). Operating as a land cooperative, the site will offer housing to 8 farmers and their families operating small scale agriculture and animal husbandry related businesses on the site. In addition to a townhouse style home, each farmer will be allocated space in the agricul-tural buildings in order to carry out their operations. The scheme of the farm reverses the fordist practice currently in place of large scale mono-crop farms, instead using historical precedents of pre-industrial communal farms to create a flexible model allowing for the production of multi-ple products on the same site while allowing farmers to adjust production based on market demands. Additionally, the site will include 96 spaces for temporary agricultural workers, organised into 8, 12 bedroom units with communal cooking and recreation facilities. This type of housing addresses a need for post-fordist farming scheme to recognise that temporary imported labour is an critical part of agricultural produc-tion in north America. The unique conditions of these workers will be addressed, notably their isolation from the larger population due to lan-guage barriers and temporality as well as the need for alternate social interactions to replace the standard family unit.

Site and community networks

production layout

SawP

20,000 per year 8 months per year planting and harvesting

(Seasonal Agricultural Workers Program)

mexico, jamaica, barbados, trinidad

20,000 per year up to 2 years any low skill labour

worldwide, mostly guatemala, phillipines, thailand

standard contract labour laws do not apply

negotiated contractlabour laws do not apply

TFW pilot(temporary foreign workers - agriculture stream)

Canadian agricultural worker porgrams

POST FORDIST FARM2A Design Studio University of WaterlooProf: Adrian Blackwell


educat

ion

A farmstead for the modern age, this project is a response to questions of agricultural productions in a post fordist economy.

The project is a response to questions of agricultural productions in a post fordist economy. Challenging the notion of a mass production farm owned by an entity, it instead proposes a cooperative model where several different specialist products can be produced in parallel. The scheme provides farmers with adaptable spaces that can be used in multiple ways, allowing production to be shifted along with an increasingly volatile economy.

The increasing role of temporary and imported labour is acknowledged by the provision of housing that meets the unique needs of migrant and temporary labourers who are essential to agricultural production in North America. Inspired by historical land allocation systems in feudal French Canada and Europe, the project proposes somewhat of a return to a more local and specialised farming model in order to meet the realities of a modern globalised market.

ABOVE: Site plan of the built area, showing the relationship between the worker and farmer housing and workspaces.

RIGHT: Sample floor plan of a townhouse designed to accommodate a farmer and their family. Each of the townhouses has a corresponding workspace across the mews.

LEFT: Renderings of various farm activities and spaces, including one of the mews lanes, an auction in the event space and the inside of one of the minimal dwellings designed for migrant farm labourers.

unit

Pla

ns

and

Sect

ions

1:100

N0m

1

2

410

b

a

a b

unit

Pla

ns

and

Sect

ions

1:100

N0m

1

2

410

b

a

a b

WORK EXPERIENCE

Naegeli ArchitektenInternshipJanuary to August 2015

FAR frohn&rojasInternship May to August 2014

ERA Architects Inc.Student InternSeptember to December 2013

Smith Brooke ArchitectsArchitectural Intern January to April 2013

Moreau IndustrialConstruction CoordinatorSummer Student May to August 2012

Science NorthScience Demonstrator October 2007 to August 2011

RG - 1:200

Mll

Spielplatz185 m

Spielplatz25 m

Sitplatz

vorhanden Baume

EG - 1:200

NGELI ARCHITEKTENJanuary 2015 - August 2015Berlin, Germany

Naegeliarchitekten is a small Berlin based practicespecialising in high quality and innovative residentialarchitecture, planning and design.

ABOVE AND BELOW: Typical floor plans showing 1, 2 and 3 Room apartment types

LEFT: Competition entry for 60 Social Housing apartments in the outskirts of Berlin. The brief was to develop cost efficient, high quality apartments to complete a typical Berlin block. Project duties included initial site research, assisting in designing and drawing floor plans, elevations and sections as well as producing images and diagrams for the final presentation to the clients.

LEFT AND BELOW: Site Plan and street perspective for a 21 unit co-operative in a former churchyard in central Berlin. The building explores the possibilities of flexible and minimal living, combining a wide range of flexible units with possibilities to expand living space into the garden. Duties included the preparation of detailed Kitchen and Bathroom layouts, as well as perspectives and material studies for hutts to be used as temporary living spaces in the garden.

RIGHT: Perspectives of the garden space with huts in various materials.

FAR FROHN&ROJASMay 2014 - August 2014 Berlin, Germany

During my 3 month internship at FAR in Berlin, I was involved in various ongoing competition and research projects in the office. I assisted in the preparation of drawings and graphics for competition entries, built both working and presentation models and prepared source material and graphics for research and presentations.

ABOVE: Diagrams of various sites in Berlin where zoning related to the proposed freeway system impacted post-war reconstruction.

RIGHT: Screenshots from Voder uber Hinterhaus a video presentation on the Berlin apartment block and its post war transforma-tions. Resposibilities included the production of base material and graphics for the animator as well as providing the voice over.

LEFT: The City That Never Got Built a mapping and research project documenting planned but unbuilt freeways and their impact on the postwar reconstruction of the city. Map was created using ArcGIS and Photoshop.

LEFT AND RIGHT: Presentation drawings and Model for Neu Sozialzentrum Wattens, a competition entry for a new seniors housing complex in Wattens Austria. Responsibilities included producing drawings and diagrams for the competition panels as well as the production of working and presentation models.

ERA ARCHITECTS INCToronto, Ontario September 2013 - December 2013

PRODUCED BY AN AUTODESK EDUCATIONAL PRODUCT

PRO

DU

CED

BY

AN

AU

TOD

ESK

ED

UC

ATI

ON

AL

PRO

DU

CT


PRO

DU

CED

BY A

N A

UTO

DESK

EDU

CA

TION

AL PR

OD

UC

T

DATE ISSUED FOR

Project no.

Scale

Drawn by

Reviewed by

Project

For

CONSERVATION OF 19 & 21DUNDAS SQ.

HNR PROPERTIES

05-085-04

Address 19 & 21 DUNDAS SQ

Drawing title

Sheet no.E.R.A. Architects Inc., 10 St. Mary St, Suite 801, Toronto, Canada, M4Y 1P9T: (416) 963-4497 F: (416) 963-8761 [email protected] www.era.on.ca

This drawing is the property of E.R.A. Architects Inc. and may not be used orreproduced without expressed approval. Refer to Engineering drawingsbefore proceeding with work. The Contractor shall verify all dimensions andlevels on site and report any discrepancies to E.R.A. before beginning work.Do not scale from the drawings. Use figured dimensions only. TheContractor is responsible for any changes made to the drawings withoutE.R.A.'s approval.

2013-12-11 SI - 08

2013-12-13 SI - 08 REVISION

2013-12-17 SI - 08 REVISION 2

2013-12-19 SI - 08 REVISION 3

1South Lobby Wall - East Elevator Jamb DetailScale 1 : 10

VARIES

RL

JG

21 DUNDAS SQUARE LOBBYWALL FINISH

3South Lobby Wall - West Elevator Jamb DetailScale 1 : 10

2South Lobby Wall - Detail at West CornerScale 1 : 10

4South Lobby Wall - West SectionScale 1 : 20

DATE ISSUED FOR

Project no.

Scale

Drawn by

Reviewed by

Project

For

CONSERVATION OF 19 & 21DUNDAS SQ.

HNR PROPERTIES

05-085-04

Address 19 & 21 DUNDAS SQ

Drawing title

Sheet no.E.R.A. Architects Inc., 10 St. Mary St, Suite 801, Toronto, Canada, M4Y 1P9T: (416) 963-4497 F: (416) 963-8761 [email protected] www.era.on.ca

This drawing is the property of E.R.A. Architects Inc. and may not be used orreproduced without expressed approval. Refer to Engineering drawingsbefore proceeding with work. The Contractor shall verify all dimensions andlevels on site and report any discrepancies to E.R.A. before beginning work.Do not scale from the drawings. Use figured dimensions only. TheContractor is responsible for any changes made to the drawings withoutE.R.A.'s approval.

2013-12-11 SI - 08

2013-12-13 SI - 08 REVISION

2013-12-17 SI - 08 REVISION 2

2013-12-19 SI - 08 REVISION 3

1South Lobby Wall - East Elevator Jamb DetailScale 1 : 10

VARIES

RL

JG

21 DUNDAS SQUARE LOBBYWALL FINISH

3South Lobby Wall - West Elevator Jamb DetailScale 1 : 10

2South Lobby Wall - Detail at West CornerScale 1 : 10

4South Lobby Wall - West SectionScale 1 : 20

ERA Architects is a mid-sized, Toronto based firm specialising in Architecture, Planning and Landscape as they relate to historic places. During my time at ERA I was involved in several projects in both the design and construction phases including restoration, retention and change of use projects. I assisted the Project Architect in preparing drawings for client review and tender and well as assisted with Contract Administration including attending site meetings and preparation of site instructions.

BELOW: Details for 19-21 Dundas Sq, a designated building in downtown Toronto. The project included a restoration of the lobby as well as repairs and replacements of the windows and terracotta faade. Duties on the project included preparation of site instructions, attendance of site meetings and preparation of signage studies.

This drawing is the property of E.R.A. Architects Inc. and may not be used orreproduced without expressed approval. Refer to Engineering drawings beforeproceeding with work. The Contractor shall verify all dimensions and levels onsite and report any discrepancies to E.R.A. before beginning work. Do notscale from the drawings. Use figured dimensions only. The Contractor isresponsible for any changes made to the drawings without E.R.A.'s approval.

E.R.A. Architects Inc., 10 St. Mary St, Suite 801, Toronto, Canada, M4Y 1P9T: (416) 963-4497 F: (416) 963-8761 [email protected] www.era.on.ca

Project no.

Sheet no.

Scale

Drawn by

Reviewed by

Drawing title

Project

For

338 DOUGLAS DRIVE

OWNER

10-080-01

DATE ISSUED FOR

Address 338 DOUGLAS DRIVE

Project north

2011-02-17 ZONING CERTIFICATE

2011-04-01 URBAN FORESTRY RAVINE PERMIT

2011-04-06 HPS REVIEW

2011-04-11 TRCA PERMIT

2011-05-10 DESIGN REVIEW WITH BLACKWELL BOWICK

2011-05-27 RE-ISSUED FOR ZONING CERTIFICATE

2011-06-28 RE-ISSUED FOR HPS REVIEW

2011-08-29 ISSUED FOR COORDINATION

2011-09-14 RE-ISSUED FOR HPS APPROVAL

2011-10-24 ISSUED FOR BUILDING PERMIT

ISSUED FOR COORDINATION2012-01-12

ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION COORD.2012-02-08

ISSUED FOR CLIENT REVIEW.2012-02-17







This drawing is the property of E.R.A. Architects Inc. and may not be used orreproduced without expressed approval. Refer to Engineering drawings beforeproceeding with work. The Contractor shall verify all dimensions and levels onsite and report any discrepancies to E.R.A. before beginning work. Do notscale from the drawings. Use figured dimensions only. The Contractor isresponsible for any changes made to the drawings without E.R.A.'s approval.

E.R.A. Architects Inc., 10 St. Mary St, Suite 801, Toronto, Canada, M4Y 1P9T: (416) 963-4497 F: (416) 963-8761 [email protected] www.era.on.ca

Project no.

Sheet no.

Scale

Drawn by

Reviewed by

Drawing title

Project

For

338 DOUGLAS DRIVE

OWNER

10-080-01

DATE ISSUED FOR

Address 338 DOUGLAS DRIVE

Project north

2011-02-17 ZONING CERTIFICATE

2011-04-01 URBAN FORESTRY RAVINE PERMIT

2011-04-06 HPS REVIEW

2011-04-11 TRCA PERMIT

2011-05-10 DESIGN REVIEW WITH BLACKWELL BOWICK

2011-05-27 RE-ISSUED FOR ZONING CERTIFICATE

2011-06-28 RE-ISSUED FOR HPS REVIEW

2011-08-29 ISSUED FOR COORDINATION

2011-09-14 RE-ISSUED FOR HPS APPROVAL

2011-10-24 ISSUED FOR BUILDING PERMIT

ISSUED FOR COORDINATION2012-01-12


ISSUED FOR CLIENT REVIEW.2012-02-17







RIGHT: Interior Elevations and details for a private residence in Toronto. Duties included researching precedents and drawing elevations and details for interior carpentry.

PHOTOGRAPHY

Toronto

Berlin

London

Paris

Nunavik

Cardiff

New York

Edinburgh

Documents

Katrina Malinski Portfolio 2015