Upload
14arpsc
View
296
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
14 ARSPC-Forests Session 30/09/08Remote Sensing
Citation preview
Seeing the Forest for the
TreesClassifying Eucalyptus subgenera for Classifying Eucalyptus subgenera for
habitat mapping using HyMap
hyperspectral remote sensing
Kara Youngentob, Xiuping Jia, Alex Held, Kara Youngentob, Xiuping Jia, Alex Held,
Luigi Renzullo and David LindenmayerLuigi Renzullo and David Lindenmayer
Where the Wild Things Are
An image from the children's book Where the Wild Things Are by Maurice Sendak
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
Background and introduction to the project
Overview of objectivesOverview of objectives
Classifying Eucalypt subgenera
Summing-up
Additional Thanks
Field SiteField Site
IntroductionIntroduction
David Lindenmayer and Ross
Cunningham (et al)
Tumut Fragmentation ExperimentLong-term field site
“Natural Experiment” on
a landscape scale
Possums and GlidersImages from David Lindenmayer’s Tumut website http://cres.anu.edu.au/dbl/tumutstudy.php
Arboreal Marsupials at TumutArboreal Marsupials at Tumut
Our Wild ThingsOur Wild Things
Brushtail Possum
Photo by: Karen Marsh
Ringtail Possum
Photo by: Esther Beaton
Greater Glider
Photo by: Esther Beaton
Heterogeneous Nature of Heterogeneous Nature of
LandscapesLandscapes
Where do the animals live?Where do the animals live?
Eucalypt forest remnants surrounded by pine plantings
near Tumut, NSW.
Photo from previously cited source
Heterogeneous Nature of Heterogeneous Nature of
LandscapesLandscapes
What do animals like?What do animals like?
Eucalypt forest canopy at Tumut, NSW Australia. Photo by Kara Youngentob
Remote Sensing Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Hyperspectral
DataData
How can we map habitat?How can we map habitat?
Vegetation Spectral Reflectance extracted from AVIRIS dataAVIRIS hyperspectral data cube over
Moffett Field, CA
Hyperspectral imagery source -
http://www.csr.utexas.edu/projects/rs/hrs/hyper.html
Mapping Foliage Chemistry with Hyperspectral DataMapping Foliage Chemistry with Hyperspectral Data
Tree canopy image
(image pixel in green)
How can we map habitat?How can we map habitat?
Distribution of Total Polyphenol (plant defensive chemical) across a forest landscape, HyMap imagery from PhD thesis by Jelle G. Ferwerda
Vegetation spectra
from pixel
Map based on variations in reflectance at specific wavelengths (bands) of the spectra
RecapRecapIn short, my research involves trying to identifying physical and
chemical properties of the Tumut landscape which might explain the
observed distribution of some folivorous marsupials using
hyperspectral remote sensing.hyperspectral remote sensing.
Photos from previously cited sources
Study ObjectivesStudy Objectives
Study Objective #1Study Objective #1� Re-establish Tumut Transects and collect presence and abundance data for all arboreal marsupials
1
Animal countsAnimal counts
Canberra
Tumut
Map of Tumut transect sites
� Transects were 200-600m depending on size of fragments (most were 600m)
40 pilot study transects. Full study area transects included 82 (20 repeated from pilot) patch
transects, and 34 continuous forest transects. Followed methods from 1995 Tumut study.
Animal countsAnimal counts
Kara re-establishing transects and rejoicing in blackberries
Approx
65k of
transects
24 spotlighting nights for full survey (controls in duplicate).
Animal countsAnimal counts
Averaged 3-4
sites per nite
A volunteer taking notes on observed animals
Animal countsAnimal counts
I noted the GPS locations of animals as
well as their distance from the edge of
patches and edge characteristics
� The purpose of collecting this data was to investigate the response of arboreal marsupials to landscape change in a plantation environment over time and to record the GPS locations of animals observed in the forests.
Animal countsAnimal counts
Images from left to right: Partially cleared plantation landscape, a baby greater glider, Eucalypt forest meets plantation.
Leaf collection and analysisLeaf collection and analysis
Foliage chemistryFoliage chemistry
Study Objective #2Study Objective #2
Stuart helping to collect
more leaf samples
Paddock Tree
Foliage chemistryFoliage chemistry
Leaf collecting from GG patchesLeaf collecting from GG patches
� We also collected leaf samples in patches where GG were radio-tracked to explore relationships between tree choice and foliage chemistry
Foliage chemistryFoliage chemistry
Found 237 trees that were marked during the GG study (a little less than half), and collected an
additional 191 “matched” trees that were unmarked
Foliage chemistryFoliage chemistry
Laboratory AnalysisLaboratory Analysis
NIR machine for capturing spectra
of freeze-dried, ground samplesTitration machine for
measuring nitrogen
Laboratory AnalysisLaboratory Analysis
Foliage chemistryFoliage chemistry
Measuring samples for digestion Digested samples ready for titration
∧New Spectra
Regression
coefficients
Model Estimate
of Nitrogen Conct.
Making a Prediction Equation from a Training SetMaking a Prediction Equation from a Training Set
Foliage chemistryFoliage chemistry
βXy =∧
Prediction Equation for Nitrogen (or other chemical) Concentration
coefficients
identified in
training
Results from Prediction Equations based on lab values for our training set
(Modified PLS with LOO Cross-validation)
Constituent Math
treatment
“smoothing”
n Mean SD SEC RSQ SECV 1-VR #
Nitrogen 2881 96 1.2092 0.1993 0.0363 0.9668 0.0579 0.9154 251
Foliage chemistryFoliage chemistry
Nitrogen 2881 96 1.2092 0.1993 0.0363 0.9668 0.0579 0.9154 251
Digestible
Dry Matter
2881 94 0.4343 0.1173 0.0189 0.9742 0.0290 0.9388 251
Available
Nitrogen
2881 68 0.2398 0.2398 0.0479 0.9601 0.0724 0.9096 251
Table derived from ISI NIR-statistical package output
Study Objective #3Study Objective #3� Measure and map the variations in foliage chemistry using HyMap data
Remote SensingRemote Sensing
HyMap flight-plan
HyMap Imagery CollectedHyMap Imagery Collected
Remote SensingRemote Sensing
HyMap hyperspectral images of the Tumut
site acquired in March, 2007
Orange tarp
Isolated Trees
Paddock
Black Tarp
Ground TruthingGround Truthing
Remote SensingRemote Sensing
Paddock
TreesPaddock Trees
Blue Tarp
Isolated Trees
Ground TruthingGround Truthing
Orange Tarp
Remote SensingRemote Sensing
Ground TruthingGround Truthing
Remote SensingRemote Sensing
Alex Held and Paul Daniel assisting with spectral data collection in the field
Remote SensingRemote Sensing
Collecting spectraCollecting spectra
0.5
0.55
0.6
0.65
0.7
0.75
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1
Refl
ecta
nce
swampwhole
stringywhole
applewhole
ashwhole
unknownstringypepwhole
Field SpectraField Spectra
Remote SensingRemote Sensing
Fresh, whole leaf spectra (after de-stepping) taken with an ASD Fieldspec Pro
Eucalyptus spectra only (Averages)
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
350
424
498
572
646
720
794
868
942
1016
1090
1164
1238
1312
1386
1460
1534
1608
1682
1756
1830
1904
1978
2052
2126
2200
2274
2348
2422
2496
Wavelength (nm)
Refl
ecta
nce
pauciflorawhole
sallywhole
camwhole
pepwhole
vimwhole
Reflectances and Ratios to Average
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
Refl
ecta
nce &
Fra
cti
on
sw ampleaves
stringyleavesw ithoutyoung
appleleaves
ashleaevs
unknow nstringypepleaves
paucifloraleaves
messmateleaves
sallyleaves
camleaves
vimleaves
Field SpectraField Spectra
Remote SensingRemote Sensing
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
350
422
494
566
638
710
782
854
926
998
1070
1142
1214
1286
1358
1430
1502
1574
1646
1718
1790
1862
1934
2006
2078
2150
2222
2294
2366
2438
Wavelenghth
Refl
ecta
nce &
Fra
cti
on
vimleaves
pepleaves
all averaged
all averaged Ratios
sw ampleaves
stringyleavesw ithoutyoung
appleleaves
ashleaevs
unknow nstringypepleaves
paucifloraleaves
messmateleaves
sallyleaves
camleaves
vimleaves
pepleaves
all averaged
Classifying Eucalyptus Subgenera
What is a subgenera, why do we care?
ClassificationClassification
Broad-leafed peppermint
(E. Dives) Monocalyptus
Manna Gum (E. viminalis )
Symphyomyrtus
Dominant canopy species at TumutDominant canopy species at Tumut
Tree Species Subgenera Characteristic environment
Pinus radiata N/A Plantation species, native to North America
Eucalyptus radiata Monocalyptus Widespread on a range of substrates. Prefers cooler, wetter areas.
Eucalyptus macrorhyncha Monocalyptus Widespread and dominant in Sclerophyll forests and poor, shallow soils.
Eucalyptus dives Monocalyptus Widespread in Dry Sclerophyll or poor shallow, stony soils
ClassificationClassification
Eucalyptus dives Monocalyptus Widespread in Dry Sclerophyll or poor shallow, stony soils
Eucalyptus viminalis Symphyomyrtus Widely distributed forest species. Prefers cooler areas.
Eucalyptus camphora Symphyomyrtus Common along gully lines and marshy areas.
Eucalyptus bridgesdiana Symphyomyrtus Dry Sclerophyll forest species.
Eucalyptus pauciflora Symphyomyrtus Characteristic of higher elevations.
Eucalyptus dalrympleana Symphyomyrtus Widespread forest species. Prefers loamy or sandy soils at higher
elevations.
Monocalypt
Darker green
leaves, non-waxy,
brittle, lots of
volatile terpenes
Symphyomyrt
Typically
lighter green
leaves, waxy,
lots of lignin
Step 1. Identify paddock tree subgeneraStep 1. Identify paddock tree subgenera
ClassificationClassification
Paddock Trees Identified in HyMap Imagery
HyMap Tree Pixels
Paddock TreesPaddock Trees
ClassificationClassification
Photograph of trees that correspond to HyMap Pixels
HyMap Tree Pixels
Step 2. Collect HyMap Spectra from Step 2. Collect HyMap Spectra from
Paddock TreesPaddock Trees
ClassificationClassification
Continumm removed HyMap vegetation spectra from tree pixel--top is “good” pixel, bottom is “bad” pixel.
Step 3. Reduce dimensionality of data by selecting bandsStep 3. Reduce dimensionality of data by selecting bands
ClassificationClassification
Freeze-dried leaf absorbance spectra
(red and green lines). Blue line is
ANOVA F-score. Where the blue line
dips below the dotted black line, there is
significant difference between
Monocalypt (n 318) and Symphyomyrt (n
236) spectra. Performed to explore data.
Tree canopy reflectance spectra from HyMap
(red and green lines). Blue lines are the
bands selected by the Bhattacharyya
algorithm function in Multispec to provide the
best separation of the two classes,
Monocalypt (n 56) and Symphyomyrt (n 49).
Used to select data for classification.
Statistic
Applied Feature Selection
Training
Accuracy
Kappa
Statistic
Kappa
Variance
Testing
Accuracy
Kappa
Statistic
Kappa
Variance
MED All 125 channels selected 56.2 0.124 0.00932 55.2 0.104 0.00939
ML
Bhattacharyya
15 Channels (B-dis 3.93) 100 1.00 0.0 96.2 0.923 0.00141
Step 4. Maximum likelihood classification on reduced dataStep 4. Maximum likelihood classification on reduced data
ClassificationClassification
ML 15 Channels (B-dis 3.93)
2, 9, 24, 35, 50, 61, 72, 79,
83, 84, 85, 87, 95, 96, 104
100 1.00 0.0 96.2 0.923 0.00141
ML
Bhattacharyya
14 Channels (B-dis 3.58)
2, 24, 35, 50, 61, 72, 79,
83, 84, 85, 87, 95, 96, 104
99 0.981 0.00036 92.4 0.847 0.00272
ML 10 Channel PCA 89.5 0.788 0.00362 78.1 0.558 0.00659
ML 10 Channel PCA with
channels (3, 5, 9) removed 86.7 0.729 0.00442 82.9 0.653 0.00546
Classification results for Monocalyptus and Symphyomyrtus HyMap spectra based on a training
data set of 56 Symphyomyrts and 49 Monocalyptus and LOO cross-validation for testing data.
SummingSumming--upup
Re-establish original Tumut transects and collect presence and abundance data to investigate the response of arboreal marsupials to landscape change in a plantation environment
Explore relationship between tree choice and foliage chemistry by collecting leaves in patches where GG were radio tracked and paddock tree leaves under HyMap flightlines
Conduct a hyperspectral remote sensing flight over my study area to investigate relationships between animal occurrence, habitat type (dominant canopy subgenera) and foliage chemistry on a landscape scale.
Photos from previously cited sources
Still to come…Still to come…
Percent nitrogen as estimated by reflectance at 1970nm + 2170nmBands selection based on findings relating to the prominence of these two absorption features in relation to nitrogen concentration (Zhi Huang et. Al 2004).
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements
The Hermon Slade Foundation
WildCountry and The Wilderness Society
Ecological Society of Australia
Many thanks for your support!Many thanks for your support!
Ecological Society of Australia
CSIRO CMAR and Land and Water
David Lindenmayer’s research team
Bill Foley’s Lab, ANU Botany & Zoology
ANU Vice-chancellery
The Fenner School (formerly CRES) staff, students and administration
You! Thank you for listening.
Image from previously cited source