39
Appendix 1: Materials used by Mr. Faust July 31–August 1, 2012 266 of 304 Authorized for Public Release

July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Appendix 1: Materials used by Mr. Faust

July 31–August 1, 2012 266 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 2: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR) Presentation on

Simple Rules for Monetary Policy

Jon W. Faust July 31, 2012

July 31–August 1, 2012 267 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 3: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Class I FOMC - Restricted Controlled (FR) Exhibit 1

0

2

4

6

8

10

1. Historical Tracking of Taylor (1993)percent

Federal Funds Rate TargetTaylor Rule

1989 1993 1997 2001 2005

3. Six Simple Policy Rules

2. The Case for Simple Rules

Simple policy rules can,

- capture most of the benefits of sound policy that policymakers can realistically hope to attain.

- provide a transparent and predictable link between the policy rate and macroeconomic determinants.

- provide a useful discipline on the exercise of discretion.

Taylor (1993): 𝑅𝑡 = 2.25 + 𝜋𝑡 + 0.5(𝜋𝑡 − 𝜋∗) + 0.5𝑔𝑎𝑝𝑡

Taylor (1999): 𝑅𝑡 = 2.25 + 𝜋𝑡 + 0.5(𝜋𝑡 − 𝜋∗) + 1.0𝑔𝑎𝑝𝑡

Inertial Taylor (1999): 𝑅𝑡 = 0.85𝑅𝑡−1 + 0.15[2.25 + 𝜋𝑡 + 0.5(𝜋𝑡 − 𝜋∗) + 1.0𝑔𝑎𝑝𝑡]

Outcome-based: 𝑅𝑡 = 0.81𝑅𝑡−1 + 0.19[2.25 + 𝜋𝑡 + 0.73(𝜋𝑡 − 𝜋∗)

+ .94 𝑔𝑎𝑝𝑡 + 2.72 ∆𝑔𝑎𝑝𝑡 + 2.05 ∆ 𝑅𝑡−1]

First-difference: 𝑅𝑡 = 𝑅𝑡−1 + 0.5�𝜋𝑡+3|𝑡 − 𝜋∗� + 0.5Δ4𝑔𝑎𝑝𝑡+3|𝑡

Nominal income targeting: 𝑅𝑡 = 0.75 𝑅𝑡−1 + 0.25 (2.25 + 𝜋∗ + 𝑦𝑛𝑡 − 𝑦𝑛𝑡∗)

𝑅 is the federal funds rate; 𝜋 is generally the trailing, four-quarter rate of core PCE inflation; in the first-difference rule, 𝜋 is the projected four-quarter rate of headline inflation; 𝜋∗ is 2, the Committee’s inflation target; and 𝑔𝑎𝑝 is the staff estimate of the output gap. In the nominal income targeting rule, 𝑦𝑛𝑡 is 100 times the log of the level of nominal GDP and 𝑦𝑛𝑡∗ is 100 times the log of potential nominal GDP, where potential nominal GDP is defined as potential real GDP multiplied by a price target equal to the GDP price index in the fourth quarter of 2007 and growing thereafter at a rate of 2 percent per year.

Page 1 of 3

July 31–August 1, 2012 268 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 4: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Class I FOMC - Restricted Controlled (FR) Exhibit 2

1. Output Gap Measurement and the First-Difference Rule

Output gap is subject to substantial measurement error in practice.

Prescription of the first-difference rule is largely invariant to measured level of the gap.

In response to realistic measurement error, a substantial response to level of the output gapprobably remains appropriate.

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3. Policy Simulations: InflationpercentPCE 4-quarter average

Taylor (1999) rule

Nominal income targeting rule

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 4

5

6

7

8

9

10

2. Policy Simulations: Unemployment Ratepercent

Taylor (1999) rule

Nominal income targeting rule

NAIRU

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

5. Likelihood of Return to ELB within 4 Quartersprobability

Outcome-based ruleModified outcome-based ruleInertial Taylor (1999) rule

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016Note: probability of return to effective lower bound (ELB) conditionalon initial liftoff date.

0.00

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

0.30

4. Distribution of Liftoff Dateprobability

Outcome-based ruleModified outcome-based ruleInertial Taylor (1999) rule

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

Page 2 of 3

July 31–August 1, 2012 269 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 5: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Class I FOMC - Restricted Controlled (FR) Exhibit 3

1. Reasons to Deviate from Standard Simple Rules at Present

Optimal policy computations (under perfect foresight) suggest maintaining accommodation longer than simple rules suggest.

Nonstandard structural features of economy at present might warrant deviating.

Risk management considerations argue for extra accommodation to offset asymmetric risksthat bias economy toward effective lower bound.

2. Simple Rules in a Comprehensive Policy Framework

Research supports that simple rules capture much of what good policy should aspire to in normal times.

Simple rules could be a useful part of, but are not a substitute for, a comprehensive policy framework.

Principles of forecast-based targeting could also be a useful part of an overall framework.

Page 3 of 3

July 31–August 1, 2012 270 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 6: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Appendix 2: Materials used by Mr. Potter

July 31–August 1, 2012 271 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 7: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Material for

FOMC Presentation:Financial Market Developments and Desk Operations

Simon Potter

July 31, 2012

Class II FOMC - Restricted FR

July 31–August 1, 2012 272 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 8: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Class II FOMC – Restricted FR Exhibit 1

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

04/01/11 09/01/11 02/01/12 07/01/12

Indexed to 04/01/11

S&P 500 IndexMSCI Emerging Markets IndexEuro Stoxx Index

(6) Equity Prices

Source: Bloomberg

FOMC

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

04/01/11 09/01/11 02/01/12 07/01/12

Percent U.K.U.S.GermanyJapan

(1) Ten-Year Sovereign Yields

Source: Bloomberg

FOMC

0

5

10

15

20

25

H2 2012

H1 2013

H2 2013

H1 2014

H2 2014

H1 2015

H2 2015

H1 2016

H2 2016

� H1 2017

PercentJune SurveyAugust Survey

� H2 2016

(2) Probability Distribution of First Increase in Federal Funds Target Rate*

*Average probabilities from dealer responses.Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Survey

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

07/01/11 10/01/11 01/01/12 04/01/12 07/01/12

Percent

2-Year Treasury Yield1-Month OIS, 6 Months Forward

FOMC

(4) Shorter-Term Interest Rates

Source: Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

04/01/11 09/01/11 02/01/12 07/01/12

BPS

Reinvestments Announced

(5) MBS Option-Adjusted Spread to Treasury*

*FNMA 30-year current coupon OAS to Treasury.Source: Barclays

FOMC

01020304050607080

Reduce IOER

New Tools*

Change SOMA

Guidance

Increase SOMA

Size

Change Rate

Guidance

Percent

AugustMedian

AugustInterquartile

Range

June Median

*“New Tools” added to most recent survey.Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York Survey

(3) Probability of Additional Policy ActionsWithin One Year

July 31–August 1, 2012 273 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 9: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Class II FOMC – Restricted FR Exhibit 2

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

04/01/11 09/01/11 02/01/12 07/01/12

BPSSpainItaly

(7) Euro Area Sovereign Debt Spreads*

*10-year spreads to Germany. Source: Bloomberg

ECB

60

70

80

90

100

110

05/01/12 05/26/12 06/20/12 07/15/12

Indexed to 05/01/12

Euro Stoxx Bank IndexUSD Libor Panel Banks*Barclays

(12) Financial Equity Prices

*Equal-weighted average of publicly traded Libor panel banks as of 2008, ex-Barclays.

Source: Bloomberg, Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Barclays Libor

Settlement

-6.0

-5.0

-4.0

-3.0

-2.0

-1.0

0.0

1.0

1.20

1.25

1.30

1.35

1.40

1.45

1.50

1.55

04/01/11 09/01/11 02/01/12 07/01/12

Percent$/€

Spot Exchange Rate (LHS)1-Month 25-Delta Risk Reversal (RHS)

(8) Euro-Dollar Exchange Rate andRisk Reversals

Source: Bloomberg

Euro Depreciation

ECB

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

01/01/11 07/01/11 01/01/12 07/01/12

Percent FranceNetherlandsGermanyDenmarkSwitzerland

(10) Two-Year Sovereign Yields

Source: Bloomberg

ECB

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0 1 2 3 4

Percent

Years to Maturity

07/04/12 (Pre-ECB)07/05/12 (Post-ECB)07/27/12

(9) EONIA Swap Curves

Source: Bloomberg

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

04/01/11 09/01/11 02/01/12 07/01/12

BPS(11) 3-Month Sterling Libor-OIS

*Occurred on same day as ECB meeting.Source: Bloomberg

Mansion House Speech

BoE Meeting*

Funding for Lending Scheme

Launch

July 31–August 1, 2012 274 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 10: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Class II FOMC – Restricted FR Exhibit 3

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

Oct. 2011 Jan. 2012 Apr. 2012 Jul. 2012

Ratio

Offer-to-CoverQuality Offer-to-Cover*

(14) Median Monthly Coverage Ratios for MEP Purchase Operations

*Quality propositions are those classified in FRBNY’s favorable-to-marketbucket, which generally includes offers up to 3 to 6 ticks above market depending on sector.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

0

20

40

60

80

100

Oct. 2011

Nov. 2011

Dec. 2011

Jan. 2012

Feb. 2012

Mar. 2012

Apr. 2012

May 2012

Jun. 2012

Jul. 2012

Percent

On-the-Run Once Off-the-RunTwice Off-the-Run Thrice Off-the-RunSeasoned

(15) Amount Accepted in MEP Purchase Operations By Seasoning

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

(17) Treasury and MBS Purchasable Room(Over Two-Year Horizon)

*Includes structured and non-standard securities, low-duration securities, less-liquid securities, and FIMA holdings.

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

($ Billions) Treasury MBS(a) Total Outstanding 12,301 4,806(b) Total Ex-SOMA 10,645 3,871

(c ) Excluded* 8,004 2,582(d) Float Adjustment 975 294

Purchasable Room (b-c-d) 1,666 995

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

04/01/10 12/01/10 08/01/11 04/01/12

BPS

10-Year2-Year

MEP

(16) Treasury Market Cost of Transacting*

*10-day moving average of price impact of simultaneously buying and selling$100 million of benchmark.

Source: Brokertec, Federal Reserve Bank of New York

020406080

100120140160180200

01/01/09 09/01/10 05/01/12 01/01/14

$ Billions Treasury MBS TotalProjected

(18) Monthly Treasury and MBS Purchases(Par Amounts)

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

(13) MEP Operations(Through 07/27/12)

*There have also been $18.6 billion in redemptions to date.Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

Purchases SalesPar Amount ($ Bil.) 438.0 440.1*

Duration (Years) 10.5 1.610-Year Equivalents ($ Bil.) 555.6 83.5

Number of Operations 140 59Offer-to-Cover (Median) 2.9 6.8

July 31–August 1, 2012 275 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 11: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Class II FOMC – Restricted FR Exhibit 4

Reverse Repos

Outright Securities**

Official Deposits

012345678

€ Billions

07/06/1207/27/12 Unremunerated

Cash

(21) Euro Portfolio Composition*

*SOMA holdings only; does not include ESF.**German and French government debt.Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

(19) Treasury and MBS Purchases and Issuance(Monthly Pace Under Hypothetical 2-Year LSAP)

*Excludes purchases under extended MEP.**Includes $22 billion of monthly reinvestments.Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

($ Billions) Treasury* MBS** TotalPurchase Pace 69 63 132Average Gross Issuance 100 95 195

Percent of Issuance 69% 66% 68%

-0.10

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

06/06/12 06/22/12 07/08/12 07/24/12

PercentItalySpainBelgiumFranceNetherlandsGermany

(20) Overnight Euro Area Repo Rates

Source: Federal Reserve Bank of New York

ECB Deposit

Rate Cut

Start of New Reserve Maintenance Period

July 31–August 1, 2012 276 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 12: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Appendix 3: Materials used by Mr. Wilcox

July 31–August 1, 2012 277 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 13: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Class II FOMC – Restricted (FR) Material for

Forecast Summary

David Wilcox July 31, 2012

July 31–August 1, 2012 278 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 14: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Forecast Summary

Confidence Intervals Based on Tealbook Track Record

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0

1

2

3

4

5

6Percent change, annual rate

Real GDP

2011 2012 2013 2014

70% confidence intervalJune TBJuly TB

6

7

8

9

10

11

6

7

8

9

10

11Percent

Unemployment Rate

2011 2012 2013 2014

70% confidence interval

July TBJune TB

0

1

2

3

4

5

0

1

2

3

4

5Percent change, annual rate

PCE Prices

2011 2012 2013 2014

70% confidence interval

July TBJune TB

0

1

2

3

4

5

0

1

2

3

4

5Percent change, annual rate

PCE Prices Excluding Food and Energy

2011 2012 2013 2014

70% confidence interval

July TBJune TB

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4Four-quarter percent change

Revisions: Real GDP

2009 2010 2011 2012

CurrentJuly TB

2

3

4

5

6

7

2

3

4

5

6

7Percent of disposable personal income

Personal Saving Rate

2009 2010 2011 2012

July TBCurrent

Class II FOMC - Restricted (FR)

Page 1 of 1

July 31–August 1, 2012 279 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 15: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Appendix 4: Materials used by Chairman Bernanke

July 31–August 1, 2012 280 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 16: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Material for

The Consensus Forecast Exercise July 31–August 1, 2012

July 31–August 1, 2012 281 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 17: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Table 1. Proposal for a Consensus Forecast

2012 2012 2013 2014 Longer run H1 H2

Real GDP 1.7 2.0 1.8 2.5 3.2 2.5 June SEP median 1.9 2.2 2.0 2.6 3.2 2.5 July Tealbook 1.4 1.6 1.5 2.1 3.2 2.5 Total PCE prices 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.8 1.8 2.0 June SEP median 1.5 1.2 1.4 1.8 1.9 2.0 July Tealbook 1.7 1.1 1.4 1.5 1.4 2.0 Core PCE Prices 2.0 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 June SEP median 1.9 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.9 July Tealbook 2.1 1.5 1.8 1.6 1.6 Unemployment rate1 8.2 8.2 8.2 7.9 7.6 5.5 June SEP median 8.2 8.0 8.1 7.8 7.4 5.5 July Tealbook 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.1 7.8 5.3 Federal funds rate2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 4.0 June SEP median 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 4.2 July Tealbook 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 4.3 1. Level in final quarter of period indicated. 2. Level at end of period indicated.

Page 1 of 5

July 31–August 1, 2012 282 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 18: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Table 2. Forecast Paths Under Alternative Monetary Policy Assumptions

2012 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 H1 H2 Real GDP growth Late-2014 liftoff 1.7 2.0 1.8 2.5 3.2 3.4 3.4 3.3 Mid-2015 liftoff 2.2 1.9 2.7 3.3 3.5 3.2 3.1 Plus $1 trillion LSAP (Alternative A) 2.2 1.9 2.9 3.4 3.5 3.2 3.0 Plus $1 trillion LSAP (greater duration) 2.4 2.0 3.1 3.6 3.5 3.1 2.9 Unemployment rate (q4 level) Late-2014 liftoff 8.2 8.2 8.2 7.9 7.6 7.0 6.4 5.9 Mid-2015 liftoff 8.2 8.2 7.8 7.4 6.8 6.2 5.8 Plus $1 trillion LSAP (Alternative A) 8.2 8.2 7.7 7.2 6.6 6.0 5.7 Plus $1 trillion LSAP (greater duration) 8.2 8.2 7.6 7.1 6.4 5.8 5.6 Headline PCE inflation Late-2014 liftoff 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.0 Mid-2015 liftoff 1.7 1.6 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 Plus $1 trillion LSAP (Alternative A) 1.8 1.7 1.9 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.1 Plus $1 trillion LSAP (greater duration) 1.8 1.7 2.0 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.2 Core PCE inflation Late-2014 liftoff 2.0 1.7 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.9 2.0 2.0 Mid-2015 liftoff 1.7 1.9 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 Plus $1 trillion LSAP (Alternative A) 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.1 Plus $1 trillion LSAP (greater duration) 1.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.1 Federal funds rate Late-2014 liftoff .1 .1 .1 .1 .5 1.4 2.3 3.2 Mid-2015 liftoff .1 .1 .1 .1 .8 2.5 3.4 Plus $1 trillion LSAP (Alternative A) .1 .1 .1 .1 .8 2.5 3.8 Plus $1 trillion LSAP (greater duration) .1 .1 .1 .1 .8 2.5 4.0 Alternative LSAP programs

The “Alternative A” program involves purchasing $600 billion of Treasury securities and $400 billion of agency MBS by the end of the third quarter of 2013. The maturity distribution of the purchased securities is similar to that under the second LSAP program.

The “greater duration” program involves purchasing $750 billion of Treasury securities and $250 billion of agency MBS by late 2013. The maturity distribution of the purchased Treasury securities is similar to that under the MEP (that is, longer than under the second LSAP program).

Estimated term premium effects of the “greater duration” programs are approximately twice as large as those under the “alternative A” program.

Page 2 of 5

July 31–August 1, 2012 283 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 19: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

-1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

2011 2012 2013 2014

June SEP central tendency proposed consensus forecast 90% confidence band

1. Real GDP4-quarter percent change

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

7.5

8.0

8.5

9.0

9.5

10.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

7.5

8.0

8.5

9.0

9.5

10.0

2011 2012 2013 2014

2. Unemployment Ratepercent

-1

0

1

2

3

4

-1

0

1

2

3

4

2011 2012 2013 2014

3. PCE Prices4-quarter percent change

-1

0

1

2

3

4

-1

0

1

2

3

4

2011 2012 2013 2014

4. Core PCE Prices4-quarter percent change

Exhibit 1. Proposed Consensus Forecast

Page 3 of 5

July 31–August 1, 2012 284 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 20: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Taylor 1999Inertial Taylor 1999Outcome-based rulePath consistent with median June SEP submissions

percentFederal Funds Rate

Exhibit 2. Static Policy Rule Prescriptions

-4.8

-4.4

-4.0

-3.6

-3.2

-2.8

-2.4

-2.0

-1.6

-1.2

-0.8

-0.4

-4.8

-4.4

-4.0

-3.6

-3.2

-2.8

-2.4

-2.0

-1.6

-1.2

-0.8

-0.4

2012 2014 2016 2018

percentProjected Output Gap

1.5

1.6

1.7

1.8

1.9

2.0

2.1

2.2

2.3

2.4

2.5

1.5

1.6

1.7

1.8

1.9

2.0

2.1

2.2

2.3

2.4

2.5

2012 2014 2016 2018

percentProjected Core Inflation

Note: Policy rule prescriptions conditioned on projections for the output gap and inflation without allowing forfeedback. The projections for real activity and inflation assume that the onset of tightening begins in late 2014(consistent with the median June SEP submission) and that the Committee does not undertake any additionalexpansion of its securities holdings.

Page 4 of 5

July 31–August 1, 2012 285 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 21: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Optimal controlConsensus forecast (late-2014 liftoff)Consensus forecast (mid-2015 liftoff)Consensus forecast (mid-2015 liftoff and "Alternative A" LSAP )Consensus forecast (mid-2015 liftoff and "greater duration" LSAP )

percentFederal Funds Rate

Exhibit 3. Proposed Consensus Forecast Under Alternative Policy Assumptions Versus Optimal Control

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

7.5

8.0

8.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

7.5

8.0

8.5

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

percent

Unemployment Rate

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3.0

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2.0

2.2

2.4

2.6

2.8

3.0

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

percent

PCE Prices

Page 5 of 5

July 31–August 1, 2012 286 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 22: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Appendix 5: Materials used by Vice Chairman Dudley

July 31–August 1, 2012 287 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 23: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Jan-10 Jul-10 Jan-11 Jul-11 Jan-12 Jul-12

Spain: 10-Year Bond YieldPercent Percent

Source: Bloomberg

40

45

50

55

60

65

40

45

50

55

60

65

Jan-10 Jul-10 Jan-11 Jul-11 Jan-12 Jul-12

Euro Area Purchasing Managers IndexesDiffusion index, composite of manufacturing and services, SA

Includes Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Ireland, Greece, Austria and Netherlands.Source: Markit

30

35

40

45

50

55

30

35

40

45

50

55

Jan-10 Jul-10 Jan-11 Jul-11 Jan-12 Jul-12

Spain 1/

Italy

Italy and Spain: Nonresident Holdings of Public Debt SecuritiesPercent of Total Percent

1/ Does not include subnational government securitiesSource: Spanish Treasury, Bank of Italy

50

75

100

125

150

175

200

225

250

50

75

100

125

150

175

200

225

250

Jan-10 Jul-10 Jan-11 Jul-11 Jan-12 Jul-12

Euro Stoxx Bank Price IndexIndex , 12/31/1991=100 Index

Source: Bloomberg

1 of 1

July 31–August 1, 2012 288 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 24: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Appendix 6: Materials used by Mr. English

July 31–August 1, 2012 289 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 25: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR) Material for

FOMC Briefing on Monetary Policy Alternatives

Bill English August 1, 2012

July 31–August 1, 2012 290 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 26: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Experimental Consensus Forecast

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

4.5Percent

Federal Funds Rate

Late-2014 liftoffMid-2015 liftoff andAlternative A LSAP

2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000$ billion

Total Federal Reserve Assets

Late-2014 liftoffMid-2015 liftoff andAlternative A LSAP

Note: Balance sheet projections correspond to AlternativesA and B in Tealbook B.

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 20205

6

7

8

9

10

5

6

7

8

9

10Percent

Unemployment Rate

Late-2014 liftoffMid-2015 liftoff andAlternative A LSAP

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 20200.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0Percent

PCE Inflation

Four-quarter average

Late-2014 liftoffMid-2015 liftoff andAlternative A LSAP

Page 1 of 11

July 31–August 1, 2012 291 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 27: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

JUNE FOMC STATEMENT

1. Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in April suggests that the economy has been expanding moderately this year. However, growth in employment has slowed in recent months, and the unemployment rate remains elevated. Business fixed investment has continued to advance. Household spending appears to be rising at a somewhat slower pace than earlier in the year. Despite some signs of improvement, the housing sector remains depressed. Inflation has declined, mainly reflecting lower prices of crude oil and gasoline, and longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.

2. Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee expects economic growth to remain moderate over coming quarters and then to pick up very gradually. Consequently, the Committee anticipates that the unemployment rate will decline only slowly toward levels that it judges to be consistent with its dual mandate. Furthermore, strains in global financial markets continue to pose significant downside risks to the economic outlook. The Committee anticipates that inflation over the medium term will run at or below the rate that it judges most consistent with its dual mandate.

3. To support a stronger economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at the rate most consistent with its dual mandate, the Committee expects to maintain a highly accommodative stance for monetary policy. In particular, the Committee decided today to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent and currently anticipates that economic conditions—including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run—are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least through late 2014.

4. The Committee also decided to continue through the end of the year its program to extend the average maturity of its holdings of securities. Specifically, the Committee intends to purchase Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 6 years to 30 years at the current pace and to sell or redeem an equal amount of Treasury securities with remaining maturities of approximately 3 years or less. This continuation of the maturity extension program should put downward pressure on longer-term interest rates and help to make broader financial conditions more accommodative. The Committee is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities. The Committee is prepared to take further action as appropriate to promote a stronger economic recovery and sustained improvement in labor market conditions in a context of price stability.

Page 2 of 11

July 31–August 1, 2012 292 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 28: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

AUGUST FOMC STATEMENT—ALTERNATIVE A

1. Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in April June suggests that the economy has been expanding moderately economic activity decelerated somewhat over the first half of this year. However, Growth in employment has slowed been slow in recent months, and the unemployment rate remains elevated. Business fixed investment has continued to advance. Household spending appears to be has been rising at a somewhat slower pace than earlier in the year. Despite some signs of improvement, the housing sector remains depressed. Inflation has declined been subdued in recent months, mainly reflecting lower prices of crude oil and gasoline, and longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.

2. Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee expects economic growth to remain moderate over coming quarters and then to pick up very gradually. Consequently, the Committee anticipates that the unemployment rate will decline only slowly toward levels that it judges to be consistent with its dual mandate. Furthermore, strains in global financial markets [ continue to | and issues relating to U.S. fiscal policy ] pose significant downside risks to the economic outlook. The Committee anticipates that inflation over the medium term will run at or below the rate that it judges most consistent with its dual mandate.

3. To support a stronger economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at the rate most consistent with its dual mandate, the Committee also decided to continue through the end of the year its program to extend the average maturity of its holdings of securities begin a new large-scale asset purchase program. Specifically, the Committee now intends to purchase Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 6 years to 30 years at the current pace and to sell or redeem an equal amount of Treasury securities with remaining maturities of approximately 3 years or less increase its holdings of longer-term Treasury securities at a pace of about [ $45 ] billion per month and of agency mortgage-backed securities at a pace of about [ $30 ] billion per month. The Committee anticipates continuing to add to its holdings at least until it observes sustained improvement in labor market conditions, as long as projected medium-term inflation is close to its mandate-consistent level and longer-term inflation expectations remain stable. This continuation of the maturity extension program The increase in the Committee’s securities holdings should put downward pressure on longer-term interest rates, support mortgage markets, and help to make broader financial conditions more accommodative. This new purchase program replaces the previously announced maturity extension program; therefore, the Committee is ending its sales of shorter-term Treasury securities and reinstituting its policy of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction. The Committee is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities. The Committee will regularly review the pace and composition of its securities purchases in light of the economic outlook and its ongoing assessments

Page 3 of 11

July 31–August 1, 2012 293 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 29: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

of the efficacy and costs of the program, and is prepared to take further action make adjustments as appropriate to promote a stronger economic recovery and sustained improvement in labor market conditions in a context of price stability.

OR 3'. To support a stronger economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time,

is at the rate most consistent with its dual mandate, the Committee also decided to continue through the end of the year its program to extend the average maturity of its holdings of securities begin a new large-scale asset purchase program. Specifically, the Committee now intends to purchase Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 6 years to 30 years at the current pace and to sell or redeem an equal amount of Treasury securities with remaining maturities of approximately 3 years or less [ $600 billion ] of longer-term Treasury securities and [ $400 billion ] of agency mortgage-backed securities by the end of the third quarter of 2013, a combined pace of about [ $75 ] billion a month. This continuation of the maturity extension program This action should put downward pressure on longer-term interest rates, support mortgage markets, and help to make broader financial conditions more accommodative. This new purchase program replaces the previously announced maturity extension program; therefore, the Committee is ending its sales of shorter-term Treasury securities and reinstituting its policy of rolling over maturing Treasury securities at auction. The Committee is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities. The Committee will regularly review the size and composition of its balance sheet in light of the outlook for inflation and labor market conditions and is prepared to take further action make adjustments as appropriate to promote a stronger economic recovery and sustained improvement in labor market conditions in a context of price stability.

4. The Committee also decided today to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent and. To support sustained improvement in labor market conditions and to help ensure that inflation is close to its mandate-consistent level over the medium run, the Committee expects to maintain a highly accommodative stance for monetary policy as the economic recovery strengthens. In particular, the Committee currently anticipates that economic conditions—including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run—are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate are likely to be warranted at least through late 2014 mid-2015.

Note: If policymakers decide that it is appropriate to reduce the remuneration rate on reserve balances, the Board of Governors would issue an accompanying statement that might read:

In a related action, the Board of Governors voted today to reduce the interest rate paid on required and excess reserve balances from 25 basis points to 15 basis points effective with the reserve maintenance period that begins on August 9, 2012.

Page 4 of 11

July 31–August 1, 2012 294 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 30: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

AUGUST FOMC STATEMENT—ALTERNATIVE B

1. Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in April June suggests that the economy has been expanding moderately economic activity decelerated somewhat over the first half of this year. However, Growth in employment has slowed been slow in recent months, and the unemployment rate remains elevated. Business fixed investment has continued to advance. Household spending appears to be has been rising at a somewhat slower pace than earlier in the year. Despite some further signs of improvement, the housing sector remains depressed. Inflation has declined since earlier this year, mainly reflecting lower prices of crude oil and gasoline, and longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.

2. Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee expects economic growth to remain moderate over coming quarters and then to pick up very gradually. Consequently, the Committee anticipates that the unemployment rate will decline only slowly toward levels that it judges to be consistent with its dual mandate. Furthermore, strains in global financial markets [ continue to | and issues relating to U.S. fiscal policy ] pose significant downside risks to the economic outlook. The Committee anticipates that inflation over the medium term will run at or below the rate that it judges most consistent with its dual mandate.

3. To support a stronger economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at the rate most consistent with its dual mandate, the Committee expects to maintain a highly accommodative stance for monetary policy. In particular, the Committee decided today to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent and currently anticipates that economic conditions—including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run—are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least through [ late 2014 | mid-2015 ].

4. The Committee also decided to continue through the end of the year its program to extend the average maturity of its holdings of securities as announced in June, Specifically, the Committee intends to purchase Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 6 years to 30 years at the current pace and to sell or redeem an equal amount of Treasury securities with remaining maturities of approximately 3 years or less. This continuation of the maturity extension program should put downward pressure on longer-term interest rates and help to make broader financial conditions more accommodative. The Committee and it is maintaining its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities. The Committee is prepared to take further action as appropriate will closely monitor incoming information on economic and financial developments and will provide additional accommodation as needed to promote a stronger economic recovery and sustained improvement in labor market conditions in a context of price stability.

Page 5 of 11

July 31–August 1, 2012 295 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 31: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

AUGUST FOMC STATEMENT—ALTERNATIVE C

1. Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in April June suggests that the economy has been expanding moderately this year. However, growth in employment has slowed in recent months, and the unemployment rate remains elevated. Employment has shown further gains. Business fixed investment Private domestic demand has continued to advance, Household spending appears to be rising at a somewhat slower pace than earlier in the year. Despite and the housing sector remains depressed has shown some signs of improvement. Inflation has declined since earlier this year, mainly reflecting lower prices of crude oil and gasoline, and longer-term inflation expectations have remained stable.

2. Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Committee seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability. The Committee expects economic growth to remain moderate over coming quarters and then to pick up very gradually. Consequently, the Committee anticipates that the unemployment rate will decline only slowly toward levels that it judges to be consistent with its dual mandate. Furthermore, strains in global financial markets [ continue to | and issues relating to U.S. fiscal policy ] pose significant downside risks to the economic outlook. The Committee anticipates that inflation over the medium term will run at or below about the rate that it judges most consistent with its dual mandate.

3. To support a stronger the economic recovery and to help ensure that inflation, over time, is at the rate most consistent with its dual mandate, the Committee expects to maintain a highly accommodative stance for monetary policy. In particular, the Committee decided today to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent and currently anticipates that economic conditions—including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run—are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least through late [ 2013 | 2014 ].

OR 3'. To support a stronger sustainable economic recovery and to help ensure that

inflation, over time, is at the rate most consistent with its dual mandate, the Committee expects to maintain a highly accommodative stance for monetary policy. In particular, the Committee decided today to keep the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to ¼ percent and currently anticipates that economic conditions—including low rates of resource utilization and a subdued outlook for inflation over the medium run—are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate at least through late 2014. As rates of resource utilization rise toward levels consistent with maximum employment, the Committee eventually will need to make monetary policy less accommodative in order to ensure that the economy expands at a sustainable pace and to prevent inflation from persistently exceeding its longer-run objective. In determining the appropriate time to increase its target for the federal funds rate, the Committee will consider a range of factors, including actual and projected labor market conditions, the medium-

Page 6 of 11

July 31–August 1, 2012 296 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 32: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

term outlook for inflation, and the risks to the achievement of the Committee’s objectives.

4. The Committee also decided to continue through the end of the year its program to extend the average maturity of its holdings of securities as announced in June Specifically, the Committee intends to purchase Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 6 years to 30 years at the current pace and to sell or redeem an equal amount of Treasury securities with remaining maturities of approximately 3 years or less. This continuation of the maturity extension program should put downward pressure on longer-term interest rates and help to make broader financial conditions more accommodative. The Committee is maintaining and to maintain its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its holdings of agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities. The Committee will regularly review the size and composition of its securities holdings and is prepared to take further action as appropriate adjust those holdings as necessary to promote maximum employment and a stronger economic recovery and sustained improvement in labor market conditions in a context of price stability.

Page 7 of 11

July 31–August 1, 2012 297 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 33: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

JUNE 2012 DIRECTIVE

The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds trading in a range from 0 to ¼ percent. The Committee directs the Desk to continue the maturity extension program it began in September to purchase, by the end of June 2012, Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 6 years to 30 years with a total face value of $400 billion, and to sell Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 3 years or less with a total face value of $400 billion. Following the conclusion of these purchases, the Committee directs the Desk to purchase Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 6 years to 30 years with a total face value of about $267 billion by the end of December 2012, and to sell or redeem Treasury securities with remaining maturities of approximately 3 years or less with a total face value of about $267 billion. For the duration of this program, the Committee directs the Desk to suspend its current policy of rolling over maturing Treasury securities into new issues. The Committee directs the Desk to maintain its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments on all agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in the System Open Market Account in agency mortgage-backed securities. These actions should maintain the total face value of domestic securities at approximately $2.6 trillion. The Committee directs the Desk to engage in dollar roll transactions as necessary to facilitate settlement of the Federal Reserve's agency MBS transactions. The System Open Market Account Manager and the Secretary will keep the Committee informed of ongoing developments regarding the System's balance sheet that could affect the attainment over time of the Committee's objectives of maximum employment and price stability.

Page 8 of 11

July 31–August 1, 2012 298 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 34: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

AUGUST 2012 DIRECTIVE—ALTERNATIVE A

The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds trading in a range from 0 to ¼ percent. The Committee directs the Desk to continue the maturity extension program it began in September to purchase, by the end of June 2012, Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 6 years to 30 years with a total face value of $400 billion, and to sell Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 3 years or less with a total face value of $400 billion. Following the conclusion of these purchases, the Committee directs the Desk to purchase Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 6 years to 30 years with a total face value of about $267 billion by the end of December 2012, and to sell or redeem Treasury securities with remaining maturities of approximately 3 years or less with a total face value of about $267 billion begin a new large-scale asset purchase program. This program replaces the previously announced maturity extension program. Specifically, [ the Desk is directed to purchase longer-term Treasury securities at a pace of about $45 billion per month and to purchase agency mortgage-backed securities at a pace of about $30 billion per month. | the Desk is directed to purchase $600 billion of longer-term Treasury securities and $400 billion of agency mortgage-backed securities by the end of the third quarter of 2013. ] For the duration of this program, the Committee directs the Desk to suspend its current The desk is also directed to reinstate the policy of rolling over maturing Treasury securities into new issues. The Committee directs the Desk to maintain its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments on all agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in the System Open Market Account in agency mortgage-backed securities. These actions should maintain the total face value of domestic securities at approximately $2.6 trillion. The Committee directs the Desk to engage in dollar roll and coupon swap transactions as necessary to facilitate settlement of the Federal Reserve's agency MBS transactions. The System Open Market Account Manager and the Secretary will keep the Committee informed of ongoing developments regarding the System's balance sheet that could affect the attainment over time of the Committee's objectives of maximum employment and price stability.

Page 9 of 11

July 31–August 1, 2012 299 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 35: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

AUGUST 2012 DIRECTIVE—ALTERNATIVE B

The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds trading in a range from 0 to ¼ percent. The Committee directs the Desk to continue the maturity extension program it began announced in June September to purchase, by the end of June 2012, Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 6 years to 30 years with a total face value of $400 billion, and to sell or redeem Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 3 years or less with a total face value of $400 billion. Following the conclusion of these purchases, the Committee directs the Desk to purchase Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 6 years to 30 years with a total face value of about $267 billion by the end of December 2012, and to sell or redeem Treasury securities with remaining maturities of approximately 3 years or less with a total face value of about $267 billion. For the duration of this program, the Committee directs the Desk to suspend its current policy of rolling over maturing Treasury securities into new issues. The Committee directs the Desk to maintain its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments on all agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in the System Open Market Account in agency mortgage-backed securities. These actions should maintain the total face value of domestic securities at approximately $2.6 trillion. The Committee directs the Desk to engage in dollar roll transactions as necessary to facilitate settlement of the Federal Reserve's agency MBS transactions. The System Open Market Account Manager and the Secretary will keep the Committee informed of ongoing developments regarding the System's balance sheet that could affect the attainment over time of the Committee's objectives of maximum employment and price stability.

Page 10 of 11

July 31–August 1, 2012 300 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 36: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

AUGUST 2012 DIRECTIVE—ALTERNATIVE C

The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds trading in a range from 0 to ¼ percent. The Committee directs the Desk to continue the maturity extension program it began announced in June September to purchase, by the end of June 2012, Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 6 years to 30 years with a total face value of $400 billion, and to sell or redeem Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 3 years or less with a total face value of $400 billion. Following the conclusion of these purchases, the Committee directs the Desk to purchase Treasury securities with remaining maturities of 6 years to 30 years with a total face value of about $267 billion by the end of December 2012, and to sell or redeem Treasury securities with remaining maturities of approximately 3 years or less with a total face value of about $267 billion. For the duration of this program, the Committee directs the Desk to suspend its current policy of rolling over maturing Treasury securities into new issues. The Committee directs the Desk to maintain its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments on all agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in the System Open Market Account in agency mortgage-backed securities. These actions should maintain the total face value of domestic securities at approximately $2.6 trillion. The Committee directs the Desk to engage in dollar roll transactions as necessary to facilitate settlement of the Federal Reserve's agency MBS transactions. The System Open Market Account Manager and the Secretary will keep the Committee informed of ongoing developments regarding the System's balance sheet that could affect the attainment over time of the Committee's objectives of maximum employment and price stability.

Page 11 of 11

July 31–August 1, 2012 301 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 37: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Appendix 7: Materials used by Ms. Yellen

July 31–August 1, 2012 302 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 38: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Class I FOMC – Restricted Controlled (FR) Questions regarding Experimental Forecast Exercise

August 1, 2012

July 31–August 1, 2012 303 of 304Authorized for Public Release

Page 39: July 31–August 1, 2012 Authorized for Public Release 266 of ......2012/08/01  · 2016 H2 2016 H1 2017 Percent June Survey August Survey H2 2016 (2) Probability Distribution of First

Questions

1. Do you think the general approach used in this exercise would be helpful in

elucidating a forecast that appropriately captures the consensus view of the

Committee? What elements would you suggest be modified in future

experiments?

2. Should the Committee proceed with a second experiment? If so, do you have

any specific suggestions regarding the design of that experiment and when it

should take place?

3. If the Committee proceeds with a second experiment, to what extent should

participants be expected to provide input to the Chairman in advance of his

initial preparation of the consensus forecast? Should a compilation of

participants’ initial input to the Chairman be circulated to all Committee

participants; if so, should it be with or without attribution?

1 of 1

July 31–August 1, 2012 304 of 304Authorized for Public Release