17
Julie Allen, Max Neill, Neil Woodhead, Stephen Reid, Lori Erwin and Helen Sanderson Person Centred Risk

Julie Allen, Max Neill, Neil Woodhead, Stephen Reid, Lori Erwin and Helen Sanderson

  • Upload
    livvy

  • View
    31

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Person Centred Risk. Julie Allen, Max Neill, Neil Woodhead, Stephen Reid, Lori Erwin and Helen Sanderson. Person Centred Risk. Risk is a part of everyday life for everyone. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Julie Allen, Max Neill, Neil Woodhead, Stephen Reid, Lori Erwin and Helen Sanderson

Julie Allen, Max Neill, Neil Woodhead, Stephen Reid, Lori Erwin and Helen Sanderson

PersonCentredRisk

Page 2: Julie Allen, Max Neill, Neil Woodhead, Stephen Reid, Lori Erwin and Helen Sanderson

Person Centred Risk

• Risk is a part of everyday life for everyone. • Every opportunity contains risks – a life

without risk is a life without opportunities, without quality, without change.

“The greatest hazard in life is to risk nothing.

To laugh is to risk appearing to be a fool.

To weep is to risk appearing sentimental.

But risks must be taken because the greatest hazard in life is to risk nothing.

Only a person who risks is free.”

Page 3: Julie Allen, Max Neill, Neil Woodhead, Stephen Reid, Lori Erwin and Helen Sanderson

If I had an hour toIf I had an hour tosave the world, I’dsave the world, I’dspend 55 minutesspend 55 minutesdefining the problem.defining the problem.

-Albert Einstein -Albert Einstein

Page 4: Julie Allen, Max Neill, Neil Woodhead, Stephen Reid, Lori Erwin and Helen Sanderson

Governing principle is that people have the right to live their lives to the full as long as that doesn’t stop others from doing the same.

Person centred planning approaches identify what is important to a person from his or her perspective and find appropriate solutions.

We commend person-centred approaches for everyone.

Page 5: Julie Allen, Max Neill, Neil Woodhead, Stephen Reid, Lori Erwin and Helen Sanderson

Dead and happy are incompatible

Alive and miserable is

unacceptable

But

Page 6: Julie Allen, Max Neill, Neil Woodhead, Stephen Reid, Lori Erwin and Helen Sanderson

1. PurposeWhat are we trying to achieve?How can we use this process to enable the personto have choice and control in their life, as a citizenin their community?2. PeopleWho needs to be involved with the person toachieve this?3. ProcessWhat is the process for thinking about the personand what needs to change in their life.How can we record this?How can we put our actions into practice?4. ProgressHow can we review our progress?

Page 7: Julie Allen, Max Neill, Neil Woodhead, Stephen Reid, Lori Erwin and Helen Sanderson
Page 8: Julie Allen, Max Neill, Neil Woodhead, Stephen Reid, Lori Erwin and Helen Sanderson

What is our purpose?

What are we trying to achieve?

“Many people hold a different purpose for direct support work, such as ‘keeping people healthy and safe’ or ‘making people happy’ or ‘protecting society from dangerous people’.

For us, happiness, health and safety for others are legitimate considerations in how support is designed and delivered; they are not its purpose”John O’Brien and Beth Mount

Page 9: Julie Allen, Max Neill, Neil Woodhead, Stephen Reid, Lori Erwin and Helen Sanderson

Who is the

person?

Page 10: Julie Allen, Max Neill, Neil Woodhead, Stephen Reid, Lori Erwin and Helen Sanderson
Page 11: Julie Allen, Max Neill, Neil Woodhead, Stephen Reid, Lori Erwin and Helen Sanderson
Page 12: Julie Allen, Max Neill, Neil Woodhead, Stephen Reid, Lori Erwin and Helen Sanderson
Page 13: Julie Allen, Max Neill, Neil Woodhead, Stephen Reid, Lori Erwin and Helen Sanderson
Page 14: Julie Allen, Max Neill, Neil Woodhead, Stephen Reid, Lori Erwin and Helen Sanderson
Page 15: Julie Allen, Max Neill, Neil Woodhead, Stephen Reid, Lori Erwin and Helen Sanderson
Page 16: Julie Allen, Max Neill, Neil Woodhead, Stephen Reid, Lori Erwin and Helen Sanderson
Page 17: Julie Allen, Max Neill, Neil Woodhead, Stephen Reid, Lori Erwin and Helen Sanderson