Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Presented by
Nail Huseynli, M&E Manager, Azerbaijan, Judicial Services and Smart Infrastructure Project, Ministry of Justice
Judicial Reform in Improving Service DeliveryBreakout Session C - Governance of Service Delivery
Reforms during 2005 - 2019
With World Bank e-Court infrastructure was established, unified
standards were developed, "Electronic Court" and "Enforcement
Management" systems were implemented. Amendments made
to the Civil Procedure Code and to the Law "On courts and
judges" - establishing the electronic simplified (fast-track)
procedure for small claims; setting up the time standards for key
court events, including adjournment; automated random case
distribution;
e-filling & e-proceeding. Enactment of the Law on Mediation
World Bank
Moving Azerbaijan’s Judiciary into the
21st Century
Reforms in 2006
In partnership with
CoE CEPEJ
regional courts were
created, number of
judges, staff and
advocates was
increased
Reforms in 2004
In partnership with
Council of Europe the
status of the Judicial-
Legal Council was
renewed, Judge
Selection Committee
was established
Reforms before
2000
new constitution
was adopted,
judicial branch was
established,
judicial
independence
guaranteed
Reforms during
2000
Substantial
renewal of the
legislation, testing
system for the
selection of judges
was introduced.
April 3, 2019
Decree of the President of
the Republic of Azerbaijan
on deepening reforms in the
judicial-legal system: the
system of private bailiffs,
alternative expertise and
etc.
Main directions of project components
REVISION OF
REGULATORY
FRAMEWORK(mediation, advocacy
institute, court decision
enforcement system,
gender policy and
etc.)
COURT
INFRASTRUCTUR
E(design of court buildings,
definition of new standards,
construction of complexes)
ELECTRONIC
MANAGEMENT ANDE-SERVICES
(e-notary, e-court, e-
enforcement, electronic cabinet
and etc.)
(various trainings, surveys,
Promotions and et.c)
HUMAN CAPACITY
BUILDING
E-Services: Main achievements and developments
Unified Judicial Portal
Personal Electronic Cabinet for parties (e-
filling of claims, case progress tracking and
management)
“e-Questioning” System (remote
questioning of parties)
Acce
ss to
Ju
stice
e-C
ou
rt
infr
astr
uctu
re
e-M
an
ag
em
en
t an
de
fficie
ncy
“e-Court” System (AZEMİS)
Court hearings audio & video
recording system (Az-FEMİDA)
Artificial Intelligence (AI), Monitoring
board, e-Management & Predictive
justice
“e-Order» automated system
“e-Enforcement” System
“e-Notary” System
"e-Court" System is applied in all the courts
facing economic disputes in the country
Necessary conditions have been created
for the introduction of the "e-Court" System
in 68 courts
“e-Enforcement” System is applied in 34
agencies
Automated random case allocation
system
e-Publication of judgments and Unified
Database of Judgments
«e-Court fee» system (electronic payment
of court fees and fines)
Design of the court infrastructure for better
service delivery
COURT BUILDING
Ad
min
istr
ative
Co
urt
ro
om
Pe
nite
ntia
ry
Public
Restricted
Open Secured
Secured
Open
Main principles of the unified approachZoning (public and administrative zones)
➢ Introduction of the unified approach,
standards and zoning for the design of court
buildings, as well as special software for
automating this work;
➢ 22 modern designs (including 7 court
complexes and 14 court buildings) were
set up in 41 courts and 18 enforcement
agencies. 8 of these projects have been
completed and 3 of them are under
construction;
➢ Standards as the basis of the Unified
European Guidelines on "Access to Courts
and the Design of Court Buildings" adopted
by of Council of Europe in 2016.Administrative-
economical courts
Courts of appealFirst instance courts
Savings by building of the
Court Complexes:
USD 14.7 mln
(“Build four – save one!”)
✓ Saving on maintenance: 30% or
34,000 AZN per year
✓ Savings on keeping technical staff
approximately 30%
✓ Judges’ efficiency has increased
on 15%
✓ Post and other savings achieved
Selected Court buildings
Gu
ba
Dis
trict
Co
urt
Sheki C
ourt
Co
mp
lex
Sabunchu C
ourt
Co
mp
lex
Masally
Court
Co
mp
lex
Og
hu
z D
istric
t Co
urt
Gadabay
Dis
trict
Co
urt
Pro-Active ICT Infrastructure Monitoring
24 x7x365
Nation wide “Traffic Light”
monitoring of e-systems
availability
Quickly identify and predict
performance issues on MoJ
e-Services delivery
Main elements of the e-Court
,
E-CABINET (E-FILLING, CASE
PROGRESS TRACKING AND MANAGEMENT) FAST-TRACK
PROCEDURE FOR SMALL CLAIMS
“Paperless approach in commercial cases”
AUTOMATED RANDOM
ALLOCATION OF CASES
MONITORING BOARD:
Tracking the time standards for key court events and
preventing adjournment.
E-PUBLICATION OF THE JUDGMENTS
AND JUDICIAL STATISTICS
MEDIATION
e-Court
Paperless document flow for efficient and
transparent interaction with citizens and
businesses
Paperless electronic
case flow between
Court Instances
Supreme Court
Courts of
Appeal
1-st
instance
courts
e
e
e
Paperless
electronic case
flow between
State Institutions
(e.g. courts and
enforcement
agencies)
e
Paperless electronic
document flow
between
Judge and Business
Entity
Completely
electronic
interaction between
the judge and the
party
Impact of the e-Cabinet on court
proceedings and increased opportunities
for parties
E-filling of claims and other documents, e-document
flow – cost savings on post, time, travel and other
expenses
Access to court - 7/24/365 More than
40,000e-Claim – 68 court
Review status of the cases, information about the scheduled hearings,
access to case documents and tracking the case review status in higher
instances, possibility to see judge’s productivity reports (clearance rate, on
acquittals, resolution ways and etc.)
e-Access to all related cases More than
810,859Cases – 68 court
More than
907,703Hearings – 68 court
By electronic cabinet and Unified Database of Judgments – signed by
judge’s e-signature
e-Delivery of judgments and e-Tracking of the status of the
enforcement of judgments
More than
90,000Judgments – 68 court
More than
1,000,000Enforcements – 34
agenciesBy electronic cabinet, SMS and e-mail
e-Notification about the case review process
Automated “Fast Track” procedure for small
claims
➢ Maximum money claim limit (“Small Claim”) - up to 2000 AZN (aprx.
1.200 USD) for civil cases and up to 10000 AZN (aprx. 6.000 USD) for
commercial cases;
➢ Applicable to all civil cases, including commercial cases.
Main criteria
Fast-track VS Standard case
flowTaking case on review
(in days)
1 VS 10
Reviewing the case
(in days)
30 VS 90
Accepting
documents only
electronically VS
Requesting the
original
hardcopy of
documents
Written proceeding –
completely
electronically(without court hearing)VS
Court hearing is
mandatory
Positive impacts of the implementation of the
Automated e-Fast-Track System for small
claims (The SilkWay Project)
Case review
Within 1 business
day
More than 60 banks
and Business entities
use the online system
Increasing confidence in
courts
About the 7%
disputed court
decisions
Speed up the enforcing
process by e-
Enforcement
Cost and time
savings for Business
Environment (lawyer
and post services)
Smart courts VS Classic courts
Classic Court Smart Court
Filing hardcopy of the documents
and getting information about the
case in person, by phone and by
post with delays
Electronically (e-filing of the
documents, e-notifications, e-
access to all related cases)Access to Justice
Manual (about 30 minutes)
registering of the each civil case
in more than 20 types of paper
logs
Processing of the civil case
registration in 10 minutes (in
average), rejection of register
paper logs
Case registration
process
On paper, human factors on
tracking the information about
the case, spending more time on
document preparation
More than 1000 e-templates,
audio & video recording of the
court hearings, real time
tracking of the case information
and etc.
Working on case
Increasing tendency Decreasing tendency Backlogs
On paper and using incomplete
data, the presence of
unreasonable pressure from the
parties
E-Monitoring of the productivity
in real time (e-management), e-
reports, effective space zoning
and planning
Management
Main achievements of the e-Court»
information system
Speedy case review process by implementing the e-
management of cases and automatization of the operations
e-Registration of cases, e-scheduling of hearings, producing of court documents
automatically (more than 1000 templates), e-notification about the court review process
(e-cabinet, SMS and e-mail), tracking of the procedural timeframes and preventing of
violations, audio & video recording of court hearings
Electronic verification of the submitted documents and
information in other state information systems
Possibility for key stakeholders to see judge’s productivity
reports (clearance rate, on acquittals, resolution ways and etc.)
Paperless electronic document flow between Judge and Party
Completely electronic interaction between the judge and the
party on economic disputes
Promoting Mediation for Efficient Service
Delivery and Public Trust
Ministry of Justice in
cooperation with
World Bank has started
Mediation Project
February,
2018
May, 2018
The first trainings for
mediators and judges
June, 2018
Pilot Mediation Center
at the Baku City
Yasamal District Court
November, 2018
Pilot Mediation Center
at the Baku
Administrative-
Economical Court No2
February,
2019
Pilot Mediation Project
successfully finished
March 29,
2019
The Law “On
mediation”
was adopted
61%39%
Conciliation of parties in pilot mediation centers
Achieved
Not achieved
The draft Law “On
mediation” was developed
within the World Bank
“Judicial Services & Smart
Infrastructure” Project jointly
with Council of Europe
European Commission for
the Efficiency of Justice
(CEPEJ)
Court Pulse: The Management Revolution for
evidenced-based policy decision making
COURT PULSE
The Management Revolution
Integration of scientific principles in court
operations covering time, cost efficiency /
productivity and quality;
Dramatic improvement in management of court
resulting in proactive role of court president and
judges, allowing for evidence-based decision-
making;
Combination of Data Science and ICT resulted
in court management revolution and significant
improvement in service to society.
Shift in mind-set and move from endless
debates describing symptoms of a problem
(backlogs, excessive length of court
proceedings) and providing excuses to
ability to make evidence based
diagnostics and agreeing on a treatment
(corrective actions);
Fair allocation of financial and human
resources in court;
Awards & International Recognitions of
Azerbaijan’s justice reforms
Council of
Europe
World Bank
Project:
“Court Pulse – The
Management Revolution”
was awarded with
SPECIAL MENTION
at the Crystal Scales of
Justice Prize awarding
ceremony in Edinburgh,
Scotland on 27 October
2017.
“e-Order” automated
system –
International
recognition of use of
artificial intelligence
in Azerbaijan (“Silk
Way” Project)
Supporting Slides: “e-Order” automated system:
Initial implementation of the Artificial Intelligence
• Banks;
• Mobile operators;
• Business entities.
e-Signed applications
(bulk or through e-
cabinet)
e-Signed judgments
(orders)
Validations the
submitted
information:
• State Registry of
Population;
• Credit bureau;
• Automated
Information
System of Taxes;
• e-Notary
e-Signing of the
judgments (orders)
by the judge
“e-Order” automated system
COURTENFORCEME
NT AGENCY
e-Enforcement
order
Supporting Slides: MANAGEMENT PANEL: Tracking
the time standards for key court events and preventing
the adjournment
• Alerts on mandatory actions within the
case;
• Status notification on highlighted
mandatory actions;
• Number of the procedural violations;
• Non-procedural applications and status of
their review;
• Number of the cases with delays;
Mo
nit
ori
ng
info
rmati
on
• Information on finalized cases;
• Information about the corrected judgments;
• Information on allocation of cases in court;
• Information about status of appealed
judgments: dismissed, quashed and kept
without changes;
• Complaints regarding the judge;
• Monitoring the enforcement of judgments.
• Scheduled hearings;
Supporting Slides: MONITORING DASHBOARD:
Tracking the time standards for key court events
and preventing the adjournmentMonitoring information:
Alerts on mandatory actions within the case
Alerts about the
necessity to
schedule the
hearing
➢ Green – number of the
existing actions within
the allowed time period;
➢ Yellow – number of the
existing actions are
close to pass the
allowed time period
(final day);
➢ Red - number of the
expired actions.
Supporting Slides: Impact of the e-
Cabinet to court proceeding and
opportunities for parties
Access to Justice (24/7):
• e-filling;
• e-Payment of court fees;
• e-Access to all related cases (case documents,
hearings, judgments and etc).
Completely electronic interaction between the judge and
the party:
• e-Communication between judge and party;
• e-Document flow (submitting and getting documents);
• Automatic publication of judgments;
• e-Tracking the status of the enforcement of judgments.
Transparency and efficiency:
• Speed-up the court proceedings and getting the court
documents on time;
• Elimination of delays and fraud.
Cost and time saving:
• No post expenses;
• No need to visit court before or after hearings;
• No any direct interaction with court staff and waiting for their
response.
Partiesplaintiff,
defendant,
lawyer, victim &
etc.
Supporting Slides: Selected court
buildings
Ga
nja
City
Niz
am
iD
istric
t
Co
urt
Sum
gait C
ourt
Co
mp
lex
Baku C
ity Y
asam
al
Dis
tric
t C
ou
rt
Baku C
ity
Su
rakh
an
y
Dis
tric
t C
ou
rt
Ba
ku
City
Na
rima
no
v
Dis
trict C
ou
rt
Ba
ku
City
Bin
ag
ad
i
Dis
trict C
ou
rt
Supporting Slides: Reserve (Full-Backup) Tier III Data
Center
State-of-the-art Data Center solution Certified by the
Global Uptime Institute Data Center AuthorityMinistry of Justice (MoJ) first to implement
POD Containerized Datacenter in
Azerbaijan
(Uptime Institute Tier III Certified)
Airbus – Up in the air with containerized
Performance Optimized Datacenter
(POD) solution in Toulouse, France
Supporting Slides: Automated random
allocation of cases
New cases are filed
e-Cabinet
MAIN ALLOCATION PRINCIPLES (CRITERIAS)
By case types – civil,
commercial, administrative
and etc..By dispute categories –
insolvency, contract
enforcement, debts and etc..
Weight of the case–
dispute types grouped
by panel of expert
judges.
On the basis of
the
court's/judge’s
caseload
Rando
m
AutomatedCourt
No human
involvement
• February 13, 2014 – Presidential decree on developing of «e-Court» information
system
• December 28, 2018 – The law about the amendments to Law "On courts and
judges";
• April 3, 2019 – Decree of the President of the Republic of Azerbaijan on
deepening reforms in the judicial-legal system.
Cases are allocated
equally among the
judges