35
Judgments of Mathematics Grade-Level in Technology Jim Flowers Mary Annette Rose Ball State University This research was supported in part by funding from the Council on Technology Teacher Education. Location: HTTP://jcflowers1.iweb.bsu.edu/pres/math.pdf

Judgments of Mathematics Grade-Level in Technologytechweb.bsu.edu/jcflowers1/pres/math.pdf · Microsoft PowerPoint - math.pptx Author: JimFlowers Created Date: 3/1/2013 12:09:46 PM

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Judgments of Mathematics Grade-Level in Technology

    Jim FlowersMary Annette Rose

    Ball State UniversityThis research was supported in part by funding from the Council on Technology Teacher Education.

    Location: HTTP://jcflowers1.iweb.bsu.edu/pres/math.pdf

  • Impetus

    The STEM movement– Fragmentation / uncoordinated elements of STEM fields– “Integrating the appropriate levels of mathematics and science

    into instructional content” (94% agreed, Wicklein, 2007, p. 13)

    TEE teachers preparation to apply mathematicsExamples of below-grade mathematics

  • “Sure, the juniors and seniors in my classes use math. They have to submit a bill of materials, and that requires plenty of multiplication and addition.”

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Standards

    How familiar are

    you with the NCTM

    Standards?

  • What grade level is this NCTM expectation?

    1. “Understand such attributes as length, area, weight, volume, and size of angle and select the appropriate type of unit for measuring each attribute”

    A. P-2B. 3-5C. 6-8D. 9-12E. College

    GradeLevels

  • What grade level is this NCTM expectation?

    1. “Understand such attributes as length, area, weight, volume, and size of angle and select the appropriate type of unit for measuring each attribute”

    A. P-2B. 3-5C. 6-8D. 9-12E. College

  • What grade level is this NCTM expectation?

    2. “Analyze precision, accuracy, and approximate error in measurement situations”

    A. P-2B. 3-5C. 6-8D. 9-12E. College

  • What grade level is thisNCTM expectation?

    2. “Analyze precision, accuracy, and approximate error in measurement situations”

    A. P-2B. 3-5C. 6-8D. 9-12E. College

  • What grade level is the math in this technology learning activity?

    3. “Numerically Controlled (NC) Mill Problem: Engraving your Name. Step 1. Plot the first letter of your name on an x/y coordinate grid and label the coordinates of the key points.”

    A. P-2B. 3-5C. 6-8D. 9-12E. College

  • What grade level is the math in this technology learning activity?

    3. “Numerically Controlled (NC) Mill Problem: Engraving your Name. Step 1. Plot the first letter of your name on an x/y coordinate grid and label the coordinates of the key points.”

    A. P-2B. 3-5C. 6-8D. 9-12E. College

  • What grade level is the math in this technology learning activity?

    4. “Now that you know your vehicle's time-trial speed, determine how far your vehicle would travel at that speed if it ran for one minute.”

    A. P-2B. 3-5C. 6-8D. 9-12E. College

  • What grade level is the math in this technology learning activity?

    4. “Now that you know your vehicle's time-trial speed, determine how far your vehicle would travel at that speed if it ran for one minute.”

    A. P-2B. 3-5C. 6-8D. 9-12E. College

  • Research Questions

    1. How familiar are technology educators with the NCTM standards?

    2. How accurately do technology educators identify the grade level associated with NCTM benchmarks (i.e., “expectations”)?

    3. Given examples of mathematics in technology education, how accurately do technology educators identify the mathematics grade level (with NCTM benchmarks as the standard)?

    4. Are there differences among technology educators in terms of their ability to correctly classify NCTM expectations and mathematics in technology education?

  • Methods: Math in Technology Activities

    Document ReviewThe Technology & Engineering TeacherTech DirectionsEngineering by Design

    Researcher examples

    40 Word Problems

    Independent CodingLicensedPracticing Math TeachersUsing NCTM Standards

  • Methods: Survey Instruments

    15 Word Problems100% Grade-Level AgreementBroad coverage of NCTM StandardsBroad coverage of Technology

    15 Items: NCTM Expectations3-5 6-8 9-12

    Numbers & OperationsAlgebra

    Geometry

    Measurement

    Data Analysis & Probability

    Demographics

  • Sample

    Snowball– CTTE List Serve– ITEA Council of Supervisors– ITEA State Associations List– Request in STEM Connections

    Online Survey– Open for 3 months– Fall 2011

  • Sex, Teaching Experience, Engineering Courses Taught

    Respondents Female Teaching Experience K12 Engineering Courses Taught

    Rolen % n %

    Median (Years) Range Median Range

    Elementary 2 1.2% 2 100% 3 2 0.5 1Middle / JH School 38 22.6% 7 18.4% 14.5 36 1 15High School 64 38.1% 10 15.6% 14 37 2 17Career & Technical Ed 13 7.7% 3 23.1% 10 29 2 5Teacher Educators 32 19.0% 2 6.3% 19 38 0.5 5State or District Sup 15 8.9% 2 13.3% 14 40 2 7Curriculum Developer 2 1.2% 1 50.0% 27 4 2.5 5Other 2 1.2% 1 50.0% 9.5 3 2 0

    TOTAL 168 100% 28 16.7% 15 40 1.5 17

  • Years of High School Mathematics Courses Successfully Completed

    1% 2%

    8%

    23%

    53%

    13% 0

    1

    2

    3

    4, No AP

    4, AP

  • Participants: College Mathematics

    McAlister (2005) reported4 of 24 programs required calculus

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120

    None

    General

    College Algebra

    Calculus

    Statistics

    48%

  • Reported familiarity with NCTM Standards

    1 = No familiarity5 = Extremely familiarMedian = 2

  • Percent of your lessons containing instruction in mathematics?

    0 10 20 30 40 50

    OtherCurriculum developer

    State or District SupervisorTeacher Educators

    Career & Technical EdHigh School

    Middle/JHElementary

    Median Percent of Lessons Taught

  • “What percentage of mathematics in technology education should be below, at, or above the student’s current grade level?”

    -20 -10 0 10 20 30Mean of Percentage Above Minus Percentage Below

    ElementaryMiddle/JH

    High SchoolCareer & Technical Ed

    Teacher EducatorsSupervisors

    Curriculum DevelopersOthers X

    -9.1

  • Respondents’ Grade Level Assignments of NCTM Benchmarks

    Greatest Success

    74%

    52%

    54%

    62%

    0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

    N (6-8). Use factors

    H (6-8). Model and solve problems

    G (9-12). Represent translations

    M (3-5). Fluency in adding

    P-23-56-89-12College

  • Respondents’ Grade Level Assignments of NCTM Benchmarks

    7%

    11%

    31%

    30%

    0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

    J (6-8). Rates of change

    I (6-8). Predictions

    A (9-12). Precision & Error

    B (3-5). Congruence and similarity

    P-23-56-89-12College

    Least Success

  • Overall NCTM Benchmarks Grade Level Judgment Accuracy

    0.45.5

    21.7

    40.1

    22.2

    9

    1.205

    1015202530354045

    3 Under 2 Under 1 Under Correct 1 Over 2 Over 3 Over

    %

    Grade Level Judgment

  • 63%

    69%

    74%

    0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

    P-23-56-89-12College

    Find the impedance Z of a circuit with 20W of reactance XL represented by the vector diagram.

    A twin-engine airplane has a speed of 300 mi/h in still air. Suppose the airplane heads south and encounters a wind blowing 50 mi/h due east. What is the resultant speed of the airplane? To solve, find the sum of the vectors that represent the speed of the airplane and the speed of the wind.

    Now that you know your vehicle's time-trial speed, determine how far your vehicle would travel at that speed if it ran for one minute.

    Respondents’ Grade-Level Estimates of Math in Technology Activities

    Greatest Agreement

  • Respondents’ Grade-Level Estimates of Math in Technology Activities

    Least Agreement

    6%

    7%

    9%

    0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

    P-23-56-89-12College

    After using a Boyle's Law apparatus or computer simulation to collect pressure and volume readings, students "create a graph from the data collected, with the 'y' axis being Volume and the 'x' axis being Pressure.

    Numerically Controlled (NC) Mill Problem: Engraving your Name. Step 1. Plot the first letter of your name on an x/y coordinate grid and label the coordinates of the key points.

    One step in completing the flexural test of a panel is to plot your findings on a data table. "Plot the weight (W) on the abscissa (x coordinate) and the sag (S) on the ordinate (y coordinate).

  • Overall Grade-Level Estimates of Math in Technology Activities

    0.1 2.2

    14

    42.2

    27.5

    12.2

    1.705

    1015202530354045

    3 Under 2 Under 1 Under Match 1 Over 2 Over 3 Over

    %

    Grade Level Judgment

    Overall: 4.6 more overestimates than underestimates per respondent for 12 items

  • Conclusions

  • How familiar are technology educators with the NCTM standards?

    Reported familiarity = 2 of 5, somewhat unfamiliar

    Corroborated by Assignment

  • How accurately do technology educators identify the grade level associated with NCTM expectations?

    Average accuracy = 40%

    Range of 7% to 74% accuracy of 15 sample expectations

    Overestimates mirror underestimates

  • Given examples of mathematics in technology education, how accurately do technology educators identify the mathematics grade level?

    Average accuracy = 42% agreement with coders

    4.6 more overestimates per person than underestimates

  • Are there differences among technology educators in terms of their ability to correctly classify NCTM expectations and mathematics in technology education?

    Some groups had small n

    No differences found among groups

  • Implications

    Replicate with a representative sample.

    Replicate with Common Core standards.

    Technology & Engineering teachers could be assisted in aligning the math in their courses with existing math standards (NCTM & Common Core).

  • Judgments of Mathematics Grade-Level in Technology

    Jim FlowersMary Annette Rose

    Ball State UniversityThis research was supported in part by funding from the Council on Technology Teacher Education.

    Location: HTTP://jcflowers1.iweb.bsu.edu/pres/math.pdf