Journal of r Bior emediation & Biodegradation · Ammonium iron (II) sulphate hexahydrate and Ammonium Nickel (II) sulphate hexahydrate, sodium hydroxide, Ricinoleic acid . were used

Volume 3 • Issue 4 • 1000142J Bioremed Biodegrad ISSN: 2155-6199 JBRBD, an open access journal

Research Article Open Access

Santhoskumar et al., J Bioremed Biodegrad 2012, 3:4 DOI: 10.4172/2155-6199.1000142

Research Article Open Access

Keywords: Photodegradation; Ferrous 12-hydroxyl oleate; Nickel12-hydroxyl oleate; Low density polyethylene; Biodegradation

IntroductionPolyolefin degradability offers a complimentary strategy to deal

with this litter problem. One of the simplest ways of modifying the existing polymer is to accelerate the degradation process already taking place. Different approaches to develop photo and their biodegradable polyolefin’s have been adopted, including both copolymerization with ketone or CO groups, photo intiating metal complexes and addition of bioactive component [1].

Transition metal element with ketone or CO containing some crude oil act as antioxidant and bioactive components are initiators of polymer degradation occurring in organic compounds [2-12]. They absorb a light up to above 290 nm, which cause their excitation or cleavage into free radicals. These ones may initiate polymer degradation and other transformations by abstraction of hydrogen atom from a macromolecule (PH) and formation of polymer alky radical (P°) [1,12-15].

Transition metals like Co, Mn, Fe, Ni, Cu etc. containing the carbonyl group and purification of Ricinoleic acid especially in the form of Ferrous 12-hydroxyl oleate and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate have been employed to initiate degradation in polyethylene films. The role of these metals/metallic compounds on the photodegradation of polyethylene has been extensively studied by several authors [15]. However, in the present work, we attempt a systematic study on the effect of Fe and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate, especially due to the concentration and photooxidation of metals. This photoxidative degradation of metals leads to increases in low molecular weight fraction by chain scission in polyethylene, thereby facilitating biodegradation. It also leads to increase in the surface area through embrittlement. In addition, the formation of carbonyl group on the surface increases its hydrophilicity. Consequently, the possibility of further degradation induces a significant enhancement towards mineralization of polyolefin’s films [16].

ExperimentalMaterials and methods

Ammonium iron (II) sulphate hexahydrate and Ammonium Nickel (II) sulphate hexahydrate, sodium hydroxide, Ricinoleic acid were used without further purification. General purpose film grade LDPE 24FS040 has been used to prepare films. Milli Q ultrapure water was used throughout the course of this work.

Synthesis of ferrous and nickel 12-hydroxyl oleate

1 mole of NaOH is mixed with 1000 ml of ethanol in a volumetric flask to get 1 N NaOH solution. The required amount of NaOH solution is prepared in a volumetric flask. 720 ml of 1 N NaOH and 80 ml of fatty acid (Ricinoleic acid - Molecular formula C18H34O3) are taken in a round-bottomed flask and refluxed for one hour. Porcelain pieces are put inside the round-bottomed flask to avoid spitting out of solution. condenser is attached and continuous supply of water is provided during reflux. Cotton plug is kept on the neck of the condenser to avoid evaporation. 100 ml of 15 N HCl is mixed in 1400 ml of distilled water in beaker to get 1 N HCl. 1 mole of NaOH was dissolved in 1000 ml of distilled water to get one mole aqueous NaOH solution. 60 g of the

*Corresponding author: Dr. Komaragounder Palanivelu, Department of Plastics Engineering & Technology, TVK Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai-600 032, India, Tel: +919362366651, +914422254708; Fax : +914422251707; E-mail: [email protected]

Received September 11, 2010; Accepted April 07, 2012; Published April 09, 2012

Citation: Santhoskumar AU, Palanivelu K, Sharma S, Nayak SK (2012) Synthesis of Transition Metal 12 Hydroxy Oleate and their Effect on Photo and Biodegradation of Low Density Polyethylene Films. J Bioremed Biodegrad 3:142. doi:10.4172/2155-6199.1000142

Copyright: © 2012 Santhoskumar AU, et al. This is an open-a ccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Synthesis of Transition Metal 12 Hydroxy Oleate and their Effect on Photo and Biodegradation of Low Density Polyethylene FilmsAnniyyappa Umapathi Santhoskumar, Komaragounder Palanivelu*, ShailadraKumar Sharma and Sanjay Kumar NayakDepartment of Plastics Technology, Central Institute of Plastics Engineering & Technology, Guindy, Chennai 600 032, India

AbstractA new additive Ferrous (Fe) and Nickel (Ni)12-hydroxy oleate was successfully synthesized and their performance

on the photo degradability of polyethylene (LDPE) films were evaluated by observing the disparity in the structural characteristic, surface morphology, mechanical, and thermal properties upon degradation. LDPE films blended with different compositions (1, 3 & 5 wt %) of Fe and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate were prepared by melt blending. Degraded films were subjected to Fourier Transformed Infrared spectroscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy, Universal Testing Machine, Differential Scanning Calorimetry analysis to investigate its structural, morphological, mechanical and thermal properties respectively. The influence of low molecular weight organic compounds such as Fe 12-hydroxyl oleate and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate additives on photo transformation of LDPE has been investigated. The results indicate that the additives play a vital role to accelerate and increase the efficiency of photodegradation in LDPE films but the hamper of photo cross linking and formation of the carbonyl group following of the Norrish type1 in this polymer. In this case Fe 12-hydroxyl oleate showed greater activity as photo initiator when compared to Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate and also the comparison of photo degraded films were subjected to biodegradation in the presence of the microbes such as Aspergillus niger and Pencillium funiculosum isolated from a dump. Fragments occur progressively in the biodegradation of the photodegradaded films. Moreover, the biodegradation test results reveals that the Fe 12-hydroxyl oleate shows 21% and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate shows 19% of biodegradation on photodegraded LDPE films when observed at the end of 45 days.

Journal of Bior emediation & Biodegradation Jo

urna

l of B

iorem

ediation & Biodegradation

ISSN: 2155-6199



Page 2 of 13

collected mixture was dissolved in 200 ml of 1mole aqueous NaOH solution and as a result a single phase solution of sodium salt is got. 1N Ferrous or Nickel ammonium sulphate is dissolved in required amount of water to get one mole of Fe or Ni salt solution. One mole of Fe and Ni salt solution was mixed with water several times till a pure water layer is separated. Then the remaining mixture is washed with a small amount of ethanol and the resulting mixture is called the Fe or Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate as shows in Figure 1 basis structure of synthesized additive.

Blending and film preparation of LDPE

The Fe 12-hydroxyl oleate or Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate was melt blended with LDPE at three different formulations 1, 3 & 5% respectively in (Haake, Rheomex OS, PTW16, Thermo scientific, Germany) Modular Torque Rheometer. In this instrument condition are as given below.

Speed Range : 0 to 550 min-1

Temperature Range : 0 to 440˚C

Pressure Display Range : 0 to 700 Bar

Torque Measuring Range : 0 to 400 Nm

LDPE was blended with the synthesized Fe and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate additive in varying percentages (1%, 3% and 5%), by using Torque Rheometer, Blending was carried out at a temperature range of 130-190°C and at a screw speed of 75 rpm. Subsequently, the pellets are dried in a dehumidifier at 70˚C for two hours to remove moisture. The film was prepared by using film die for all the three percentages of additives. The wall thickness of the film was kept as 50 microns by controlling the speed of the nip rollers and output rate.

Photo degradation

All blended samples were subjected to photodegradation studies using QUV UV Weather-o-meter. Films of 25 mm width were used to evaluate the degradation phenomenon. Samples were exposed to two different test cycles of UV irradiation and condensation as shown in Table 1. Subsequently the samples were tested and characterized for 1,2,3,4,5 and 6th day. For 24 hours for eight hours UV cycle was carried out and for next four hours condensation cycle was carried. For the remaining 12 h, the cycle was repeated in the same order. Photodegradation affect the physical and optical properties of a plastic relative to the initial specified properties.

Polyethylene was blended with the synthesized Fe or Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate additive, the photodegradation mechanism both metal 12-hydroxyl oleate in presence of double bond acting plasticizing effect to virgin polymer so the glass transition temperature reduced, OH functional group as compatibilizer, long alkyl group and pendent group for compatibility during processing, metal and carbonyl group for combined effect of photo activator in virgin polymer. In this case additive contains hydroxyl group, carbonyl group and double bond acting various functionalized compatabilizing agent, photoactivator and plasticizing effect respectively. This may know as Multifunctional Active Additive (MFA) as shown in Figure 1.

Transition metal 12-hydroxyl oleate reacted within virgin polymer during UV weathering condition M2+ to M3+ when exposed to UV radiation. This could be due to the fact that in the photolysis process of Metal 12-hydroxyl oleate, the M2+ ions Oxidizes to M3+ more readily and these ions causes photodegradation of the polymer chains to form carbonyl groups following of the Norrish type 1 reaction.

Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer (FTIR)

The structural changes in LDPE films due to the presence of Fe and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate effect of UV exposure were studied by Nicolet 6000 (USA) Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer (FTIR) with the wave number range of 400-4000 cm-1.

Mechanical properties

Tensile properties (ASTM D 882): Tensile properties of virgin LDPE with Fe and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate blended sample before and after UV exposure, with dimensions 150 x 25 x 0.060 mm were subjected to tensile tests as per ASTM D 882, using Universal Testing Machine (UTM), Lloyd Instrument Ltd, UK. A cross head speed of 500 mm/min and gauge length of 50 mm in both machine and transverse directions.

Thermal properties

Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) analysis: Melting behavior of transition metal 12-hydroxyl oleate blended samples is being studied by employing Perkin Elmer (USA) differential scanning

Metal and Carbonyl groupfor combined effect of photo activator

Long alkyl group and pendent group forcompatability during processing

Double bond imparting theself plasticizing effect

Functional group asas compatbilizer

Where, M = Fe, Co, Ni, Cu and n = 2 to 3

-OH = Rective functionality of this metal salts

M O-CO

OHn+

Figure 1: New class of generally structure of Transition metal 12 hydroxyl oleate.

Cycle Irradiation W/m2 Temperature (˚C) Time (Hrs)

UV Irradiation 0.63 60 8

Condensation - 50 4

Table 1: UV cycle for photodegradation studies.

Absorption bands (cm-1) and their peak assignmentsTransition metal (Fe or Ni) 12 hydroxyl oleate1711 -C=O stretching2723 -C-H out of plane bend2922 C-H stretching1432 -C=C stretching1377 -CH3 symmetric deformation1592 Asymmetric vibration carboxyl group

coordinated to the metal3350 O-H stretching vibration

Table 2: Characteristic peak values in FTIR spectra for transition metal 12 hydroxyl oleate (Fe or Ni 12 hydroxyl oleate).

Absorption bands (cm-1) and their peak assignmentsLDPE (Low density Polyethylene)

545 -CH2 Rocking Vibration1464 -CH3 anti symmetric deformation1472 -CH2 symmetric deformation1677 -CH3 symmetric deformation2937 -CH2 anti symmetric deformation2896 -CH3 symmetric stretching

Table 3: Characteristic peak values in FTIR spectra for virgin LDPE.



Page 3 of 13

calorimeter. Sample 5 mg weights were scanned from 45 to 200˚C at the heating rate of 5˚C/min to detect the melting characteristics of the sample before and after exposure to UV radiation. The percentage of crystallinity of 12-hydroxyl oleate blended LDPE films was calculated as follows.

% of Crystallinity = (ΔHm-ΔHc)/ ΔHco

Where ΔHm - Enthalpy of melting (J/g)

ΔHc - Enthalpy of Crystallization (J/g)

ΔHco - Enthalpy of 100% crystalline polymer (277.3 J/g)

Thermo gravimetric analysis: Thermal degradation of LDPE Fe 12-hydroxyl oleate and LDPE Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate blended samples of before and after UV Exposure were analyzed by Perkin Elmer (USA), at the heating rate of 10˚C/min from 50 to700˚C.

Optical properties

Optical properties such as luminous transmittance and haze were studied for the Fe 12-hydroxyl oleate and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate blended samples (LDPE) before UV exposure and after UV to find the effect of additive on the optical characteristics of the film. For measuring haze

and luminous transmittance, The BYK Gardner Spectrophotometer was employed (ASTM D 1003).

Scanning electron morphology

The scanning electron microscopic analysis of fractured surface of LDPE-Fe 12-hydroxyl oleate, LDPE-Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate film was carried out using CARL ZESIS Model; EVO MA 15 scanning electron microscope. The surface of the samples were coated with conductive heavy metal such as gold.

Elemental analysis

The carbon content of the each test sample determined by elemental analysis by using Carlo Erbal model 1106 elemental analysis.

Titration method of CO2 determined test

The degradation of chemical compounds in the titration CO2 evolution was based on the same principle as the conventional CO2 evolution test. Test vessels were cylindrical bottles with a 2-liter volume containing the same mixture of inorganic (Barium hydroxide) medium, organic test substance, and mixed inoculums in a liquid volume of 1.5 liter. Incubation, aeration with CO2-free air, and agitation of the test mixture, blank, and control vessels were also comparable. The exhaust gas from the vessels was passed through a glass chamber (volume, 1500 ml) that was immersed in the test mixture and filled with 50 ml of a 0.25 N aqueous Ba(OH)2 solution titrated with HCl. The remain Barium Hydroxide was calculated after the end point. By subtracting the blank values from titrant value biodegradation was calculated and expressed as a percentage of the CO2. There was a linear correlation between the amounts of carbon dioxide liberated. This correlation was determined for each volume and concentration of absorption solution used.

Oxygen undergoes complete oxidative biodegradation of the test compound. The concentration of inoculums was 30 mg of dry matter of Solid compost, and the concentration of the test compound was 100 mg of substance liter-1, or 50 to 100 mg liter-1 of theoretical oxygen demand (ThOD). The test duration was minimum 45 days, and the tests were performed at an incubation temperature of 58 ± 2˚C [17].

ASTMD-5338: Test procedure

The amount of CO2 produces pass through Ba(OH)2 solution and is precipitated as BaCO3

( ) 2 3 22Ba OH CO BaCO H O+ → +

• Determination ofCO2 by titrating the remaining Ba(OH)2 with 0.05N HCL

( ) 2 222 2Ba OH HCL BaCl H O+ → +

1.1* *12% *10044*ml HClGaseous C yield

y

=

Y = mg carbon charged to flask

Biodegradation Calculation( )

% deg g g

i

MeanC MeanC blankBio radation

C−

=

Where ;

Cg = Amount of gaseous carbon produced g, and

Ci = Amount of carbon in test compound in the sample, g.

3500 300 2500 2000 1500 1000

100

50

3350

2953

2922

1710 1592

1436

1198 1035

Transistion metal 12 hydroxy oleat (Multi functional additive)

%

Tran

smitt

ance

Figure 2: FTIR spectra of transition metal- 12 hydroxyl oleate (Fe and Ni 12 hydroxyl oleate).

2913 2847

Virgin LDPE

4000 2000 500

1604

1470

1376

717

729

Tran

smitt

ance

%

Wavenumber cm -1

Figure 3: FTIR spectra of virgin LDPE.



Page 4 of 13

Results and DiscussionCharacterization of ferrous and nickel 12-hydroxyl oleate

The FTIR spectra of all the Fe and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate exhibited absorbance at 1592 cm-1 due to asymmetric vibration stretching of the carboxylic group coordinated to the metal ion. The UV-Vis spectra of the oleate in ethanol show absorption maximum at 290- 360 nm as Fe and 290-305 nm as Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate.

Photo-oxidation of LDPE films containing ferrous and nickel 12-hydroxyl oleate

With an aim to investigate the chemical changes taking place in the polyethylene films due to photo-oxidation, the evolution of the FTIR Spectra was studied with respect to exposure time, similar changes in the FTIR spectra were observed in all the samples, the extent of change depends on the concentration and nature of oleate. Some new features that show increased intensity with UV exposure. As observed by other workers, a new (structured) band appears at -1712 cm-1 which can be attributed to the generation of carbonyl groups primarily on the surface of the polymer.

The increases in the absorbance of these bands were however more pronounced for samples containing Fe and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate than neat LDPE as far as the band shape is concerned, a progressive broadening of the carbonyl band was observed. The carbonyl band is a result of overlapping of absorption bands due to several

functional groups like ketones, carboxylic acids, aldehydes, esters and peroxylcarbolylic acids, etc. the broadening [18,19].

The characteristic peak absorptions of virgin LDPE film and transition metal 12-hydroxyl oleate are given in Table 2 and 3 respectively. The FTIR spectra of transition metal 12-hydroxyl oleate was shown in Figure 2 and LDPE in Figure 3.

As shown in Figure 4, 5 and 6 (a,b) a peak at around 1712 cm-1corre-sponding to carbonyl group of transition metal 12-hydroxyl oleate was

MD- Machine direction, TD- Transverse directionD0 –Without UV exposure, D1- With UV exposure etc.Table 4: Effect of UV exposure on mechanical properties of Fe 12 hydroxyl oleate blended LDPE films.

S.No Sample ID Tensile strength (MPa) Elongation at break (%)1 LDPE VIRGIN-MD 24.85 225.602 LDPE VIRGIN-TD 19.20 356.603 LDPE 1%Fe oleateD0 MD 19.93 199.464 LDPE 1% Fe oleate D0 TD 16.08 302.505 LDPE 1% Fe oleate D1 MD 18.08 182.706 LDPE 1% Fe oleate D1 TD 13.58 245.607 LDPE 1% Fe oleate D2 MD 17.47 39.598 LDPE 1% Fe oleateD2 TD 13.51 54.479 LDPE 1% Fe oleate D3 MD 15.01 18.6010 LDPE 1% Fe oleateD3 TD 13.70 37.3611 LDPE 3% Fe oleateD0 MD 18.03 155.4012 LDPE 3% Fe oleate D0 TD 15.80 268.6013 LDPE 3% Fe oleateD1 MD 16.34 135.9614 LDPE 3% Fe oleateD1 TD 13.20 150.7015 LDPE 3% Fe oleateD2 MD 16.15 28.7516 LDPE 3% Fe oleateD2 TD 15.89 49.4417 LDPE 3% Fe oleateD3 MD 13.91 16.9318 LDPE 3% Fe oleateD3 TD 10.95 27.3019 LDPE 5% Fe oleateD0 MD 17.85 113.4520 LDPE 5% Fe oleateD0 TD 14.65 219.6921 LDPE 5% Fe oleate D1 MD 16.61 120.822 LDPE 5% Fe oleate D1 TD 13.20 152.6023 LDPE 5% Fe oleateD2 MD 14.12 14.2624 LDPE 5% Fe oleateD2 TD 12.13 38.0925 LDPE 5% Fe oleateD3 MD 12.71 4.5026 LDPE 5% Fe oleateD3 TD 10.14 20.7727 LDPE 1% Fe oleateD4 become brittle28 LDPE 3% Fe oleate D4 become brittle29 LDPE 5% Fe oleate D4 become brittle

S.No Sample ID Tensile strength (MPa) Elongation at break (%)1 LDPE VIRGIN-MD 24.85 229.602 LDPE VIRGIN-TD 19.20 369.603 LDPE 1%Ni oleate D0 MD 24.32 221.544 LDPE 1% Ni oleate D0 TD 19.07 345.895 LDPE 1% Ni oleate D1 MD 24.07 215.866 LDPE 1% Ni oleate D1 TD 18.98 325.877 LDPE 1% Ni oleate D2 MD 23.08 207.568 LDPE 1% Ni oleate D2 TD 18.64 309.789 LDPE 1% Ni oleate D3 MD 21.92 200.43

10 LDPE 1% Ni oleate D3 TD 18.32 280.0911 LDPE 1% Ni oleate D4 MD 19.06 196.4512 LDPE 1% Ni oleate D4 TD 17.67 225.8913 LDPE 1% Ni oleate D5 MD 17.56 189.8714 LDPE 1% Ni oleate D5 TD 17.08 170.8715 LDPE 1% Ni oleate D6 MD 15.80 128.7516 LDPE 1% Ni oleate D6 TD 14.07 90.2317 LDPE 1% Ni oleate D7 MD 14.98 70.6518 LDPE 1% Ni oleate D7 TD 13.07 30.3519 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D0 MD 24.12 207.8920 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D0 TD 15.08 219.6921 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D1 MD 23.90 196.9022 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D1 TD 14.20 206.8723 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D2 MD 21.08 174.4624 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D2 TD 13.15 198.5625 LDPE 3 % Ni oleate D3 MD 19.76 160.4526 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D3 TD 13.08 167.9827 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D4 MD 18.76 150.7028 LDPE3% Ni oleate D4 TD 12.65 136.9829 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D5 MD 15.72 115.8030 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D5 TD 12.32 93.0931 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D6 MD 14.87 70.7532 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D6 TD 12.06 64.0933 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D7 MD 13.76 20.3534 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D7 TD 11.96 28.8935 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D0 MD 21.87 135.6736 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D0 TD 14.78 142.0837 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D1MD 19.67 115.738 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D1 TD 14.71 110.5639 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D2 MD 18.43 98.0740 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D2TD 14.45 98.3441 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D3 MD 16.67 87.1342 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D3 TD 13.23 73.2343 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D4 MD 15.78 78.0944 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D4 TD 12.54 56.9845 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D5 MD 12.98 45.9846 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D5TD 11.49 22.9847 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D6 MD 11.49 19.7848 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D6 TD 10.43 11.98

Table 5: Effect of UV exposure on mechanical properties of Ni 12 hydroxyl oleate blended LDPE films.

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-6199.1000142



Page 5 of 13

observed for LDPE films with 1%, 2% and 3% additive. It can be seen from the figure that the absorption intensity increases with increasing the concentration of the additive from 1% to 3%. On exposure of the films to the accelerated UV radiation further increases the intensity which is due to the formation of new carbonyl groups on photodegra-

dation involving the chain scission following the Norrish type 1 reac-tion.

Mechanical properties evaluation

The tensile strength data of LDPE film with iron (Fe) and nickel

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

Tran

smitt

ance

%

LDPE1% DO

LDPE 1% D1

LDPE 1% D2

LDPE 1% D3

LDPE 1% D4

LDPE 1% D5

LD-Ni -MF A1% D8

LD-Ni-MF A 1% D7

LD-Ni-MF A 1% D6

LD-Ni-MF A 1% D5

LD-Ni-MF A 1% D4

LD-Ni-MF A 1% D3

LD-Ni-MF A 1% D2

LD-Ni-MF A 1% D1

LD-Ni-MF A 1% D0

Tran

smitt

ance

%

2194 2846

2914 2847

2914 2847

2914 2847

2914 2847

2914 2847

3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500

2914 2847

2914 2847

2914 2847

2914 2847

2914 2847

2914 2847

2914

2914

2914

2847

2847

28474000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500

1712

1714

1462

1462

1377713

714

714

714

714

714

729

729

729

1017.6

729

729

729

720

720

720

720

720

720

720

720

720

718

718

718

718

718

718

718

718

718

1377

1712

1712

1713

1714

Wavenumber cm-1

1714

1714

1714

1714

1714

1713

1713

1713

1462

1462

1462

1462

1462

1462

1462

1602 1377

1377

1376

1462

1461

1461

1461

1471

1471

1471

Wavenumber (cm-1)

487.

6 4420

Figure 4: Comparison FTIR spectra of LDPE+1% Fe 12 hydroxyl oleate (a) and Ni-12 hydroxyl oleate (b) in presence of UV upto five days and eight day.

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-6199.1000142



Page 6 of 13

(Ni) 12-hydroxyl oleate before and after UV exposure are presented in the tables 4 and 5.

The tensile strength of LDPE virgin sample decreases with the incorporation of Fe 12-hydroxyl oleate as well as Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate in the concentration of 1%, 3% and 5%. There was a considerable decrease in the tensile strength and elongation at break on exposure of the films with additive to UV radiation. Both iron based as well as nickel based additives show considerable decrease in the tensile strength and elongation at break as shown in Figure 7-10 (a,b). The deterioration

in mechanical properties of films was observed in both the machine direction and transverse direction, but the rate of deterioration was high in transverse direction. Also, increasing the concentration of additive from 1% to 5% increases the degradation.

In the case of LDPE films with Fe 12-hydroxyl oleate additive show decrease in tensile strength and elongation and ultimately become brittle when exposed to UV radiation for 96 hrs (four days). Whereas the films with Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate additive show decrease in tensile properties and become brittle only after sixth day (144 hours) when

LDPE 3% D0

LDPE 3 % D1

LDPE 3 % D2

LDPE 3 % D3

LDPE 3 % D4

LDPE 3 % D5

LD-Ni-MF A 3 % D 8

LD-Ni-MF A 3 % D7

LD-Ni- MF A 3 % D6

LD-Ni- MF A 3 % D5

LD-Ni- MF A 3 % D4

LD-Ni- MF A 3 % D3

LD-Ni- MF A 3 % D2

LD-Ni- MF A 3 % D1

LD-Ni- MF A 3 % D0

2194 28461712

1712

1712

1713

1714

1714

1714

1714

1714

1714

1713

1713

1713

1713

1462 720

720

720

720

720

720

720

720

720

718

718

718

718

718

718

718

718

718

1462

1462

1462

1462

1462

1462

1462

1462

1462

1462

1602

1471

1471

1471

1462

1461

1461

1461

1377729

729

729

729

729

729

1045 714

714

714

714

713

7141377

1377

1377

1376

2914 2847

2914

2914

2914

2914

2914

2914

2914

2914

2914

2914

2914

2914

2914

2847

2847

2847

2847

2847

2847

2847

2847

2847

2847

2847

2847

2847

4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500Wavenumber (cm-1)

3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500

Wavenumber cm-1

(a)

(b)

Tran

smitt

ance

%Tr

ansm

ittan

ce %

Figure 5: Comparison FTIR spectra of LDPE+3% -Fe 12 hydroxyl oleate and Ni-12 hydroxyl oleate in presence of UV upto five days and eight day.

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-6199.1000142



Page 7 of 13

(a)

(b)

LDPE 5% D0

LDPE 5% D1

LDPE 5% D2

LDPE 5% D3

LDPE 5% D4

LDPE 5% D5

LD-Ni-MFA 5% D8

LD-Ni-MFA 5% D7

LD-Ni-MFA 5% D6

LD-Ni-MFA 5% D5

LD-Ni-MFA 5% D4

LD-Ni-MFA 5% D3

LD-Ni-MFA 5% D2

LD-Ni-MFA 5% D1

LD-Ni-MFA 5% D0

2194

1712

1712

1712

1713

1714

1714

1471

1471

1471

1462

1462

1462

1461

1461

1461

1602

1377

1377

729

729

1045 729

729

729

729

713

714

714

714

714

714

1377

1377

1376

2846

2847

2847

2847

2847

2847

2914

2914

2914

2914

2914

2914 2847 1714

1714

1714

1714

1713

1713

1713

1713

1462 720

720

720

720

720

720

720

720

720

718

718

718

718

718

718

718

718

718

1462

1462

1462

1462

1462

1462

1462

1462

2914 2847

2914 2847

2914 2847

2914 2847

2914 2847

2914

2914

2914

2847

2847

28474000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000

Wavenumber cm-1

3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500

Tran

smitt

ance

%

Tran

smitt

ance

%

Wavenumber cm-1

Figure 6: Comparison FTIR spectra of LDPE+5% -Fe 12 hydroxyl oleate and Ni-12 hydroxyl oleate in presence of UV upto five days and eight day.

(a) 22

20

18

16

14

12

10

Tens

ile S

treng

th (M

Pa)

0 1 2 3

Tensile strength Machine DirectionLDPE 1%Fe oleateLDPE 3%Fe oleateLDPE5% Fe oleate

UV exposure time (days)

(b) 26

24

22

20

18

16

14

12

10

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Tens

ile S

treng

th (M

Pa)


Tensile strength at Machine Direction

LDPE1% Ni oleateLDPE3% Ni oleateLDPE5% Ni oleate

Figure 7: Effect of M-oleate on tensile strength of LDPE-Fe 12 hydroxyl oleate (a) and LDPE- Ni 12 hydroxyl oleate (b) Machine Direction in Presence of UV Exposure.

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-6199.1000142



Page 8 of 13

affects the mechanical properties. This phenomenon is relatively slower in case of LDPE films not containing additive, where UV irradiation leads to cross linking and hence higher tensile strength [20].

Thermal properties

Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) analysis: The differential scanning calorimetric data pertaining to the melting point and degree of crystallinity of Fe and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate blended LDPE film


(a) 17

16

15

14

13

12

11

100 1 2 3

Tens

ile S

treng

th (M

Pa)

Tensile strength Transverse Direction

LDPE 1%Fe oleateLDPE3%Fe oleateLDPE 5%Fe oleate

(b)

20

19

18

17

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

Tens

ile S

treng

th (M

Pa)

Tensile Strength Transverse Direction

LDPE 1% Ni oleateLDPE 3% Ni oleateLDPE 5% Ni oleate

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7


Figure 8: Effect of oleate on tensile strength of a) LDPE-Fe 12 hydroxyl oleate and b) LDPE-Ni 12 hydroxyl oleate Transverse Direction in Presence of UV Exposure.

(a)(b)

(a)(b)

% o

f Elo

ngat

ion

Tensile Elongation (%) Machine Direction

LDPE 1% Fe oleate

UV Exposure time (Days)

Tensile Elongation (%) Transverse Direction

LDPE 3% Fe oleateLDPE 5% Fe oleate

LDPE 1% Fe oleateLDPE 3% Fe oleateLDPE 5% Fe oleate

250

200

150

100

50

0

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

% o

f elo

ngat

ion

(%)

0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 UV exposure time (days)

Figure 9: Effect of M-oleate on elongation of a) LDPE-Fe 12 hydroxyl oleate and b) LDPE-Ni 12 hydroxyl oleate Machine Direction in Presence of UV Exposure.

exposed to UV radiation. This could be due to the fact that in the photolysis process of Ferrous 12-hydroxyl oleate, the Fe2+ ions oxidizes to Fe3+ more readily and these ions causes photodegradation of the polymer chains to form carbonyl groups following the Norrish type 1 reactions. In other words, in absorption of energy in the form of light, the Fe and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate undergo decarboxylation leading to the formation of the free radicals. These generate radicals on the main chain of the polymer matrix leading to chain scission which finally

(a)

LDPE 1 % Ni LDPE 3 % Ni LDPE 5 % Ni

Tensile Elongation Machine Directionoleateoleateoleate

250

200

150

100

50

00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

% o

f elo

ngat

ion

(%)


(b) Tensile Elongation Transverse Direction

LDPE 1 % Ni

LDPE 3% Ni

LDPE 5 % Ni

oleateoleateoleate

% o

f elo

ngat

ion

(%)


400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

00 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Figure 10: Effect of M-oleate on elongation of a) LDPE-Fe 12 hydroxyl oleate and b) LDPE-Ni 12 hydroxyl oleate Transverse Direction in Presence of UV Exposure.

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-6199.1000142



Page 9 of 13

incorporation of Fe 12-hydroxyl oleate and Ni 12- hydroxyl oleate, the melting point is found to change slightly due to the presence of additive in LDPE matrix. In case of the LDPE, 5% Fe 12-hydroxyl oleate samples exposed to UV for five days and a marginal decrease in the melting point from 111.29 to 109.21˚C was observed whereas in the case of Ni-12-hydroxyl oleate samples exposed to UV a marginal decrease in the melting point from 111.35 to 109.23˚C was observed only after eight days. This could be due to the faster photodegradation of LDPE films in the presence of Fe 12-hydroxyl oleate additive. In this case LDPE blend Fe and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate additive there is no much difference in the melting point compare to virgin LDPE and the same period of time (five days in the presence of UV exposure) due to oleate additive which contains a double bond and carbonyl group, some inter and intra molecular interaction in the polymer effected by UV exposure. Corresponding ∆H peak get broadening indicates the formation of low molecular weight species due to photodegradation. The percentage of crystallinity decreases by increasing the additive concentration. It was observed that the degree of crystallinity of LDPE films with 5% Fe 12-hydroxyl oleate decreases from 100 to 63 when the samples were exposed to UV for 5 days. These results are in agreement with the mechanical properties data thus revealing higher degradation rate at higher additive percentage.

Thermo gravimetric analysis (TGA): The thermo gravimetric analysis of LDPE with Fe 12-hydroxyl oleate and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate additive is summarized in Table (8 and 9). The results show that the initial decomposition temperature of LDPE after blending with Fe 12-hydroxyl oleate as well as Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate decreases significantly. The increase in percentage of additive further decreases the initial decomposition temperature. In fact about 120˚C decrease in initial decomposition temperature was observed with 5% additive concentration. This is because of the initiation of degradation due to the presence of metal ions. The degradation due to UV exposure involves the chain scission and formation of carbonyl groups following the Norrish type 1 reaction. However, there is a significant increase in ultimate decomposition temperature with increasing the concentration

S.No. Sample ID Melting Temperature (˚C) Degree of crystallinity

1 LDPE VIRGIN 111.45 1002 LDPE VIRGIN D5 111.40 993 LDPE 1 % Fe oleate D0 111.20 974 LDPE 1 % Fe oleate D1 110.77 865 LDPE 1 % Fe oleate D2 110.34 816 LDPE 1 % Fe oleate D3 109.91 787 LDPE 1 % Fe oleate D4 109. 48 728 LDPE 1 % Fe oleate D5 109.05 699 LDPE 3 % Fe oleate D0 110.70 96

10 LDPE 3 % Fe oleate D1 109.41 8411 LDPE 3 % Fe oleate D2 109.30 8012 LDPE 3 % Fe oleate D3 109.25 7513 LDPE 3 % Fe oleate D4 109.15 7114 LDPE 3 % Fe oleate D5 109.21 6615 LDPE 5 % Fe oleate D0 110.20 9616 LDPE 5 % Fe oleate D1 109.77 8717 LDPE 5 % Fe oleate D2 109.62 8118 LDPE 5 % Fe oleate D3 109.54 7319 LDPE 5 % Fe oleate D4 109.37 6820 LDPE 5 % Fe oleate D5 109.21 63

Table 6: Effect of UV exposure on Melting point and Degree of crystallinity of Fe 12 hydroxyl oleate lended LDPE films.

S.No. Sample ID Melting Point (˚C) Degree of crystallinity1 LDPE VIRGIN 111.45 1002 LDPE VIRGIN- D5 111.40 993 LDPE 1 % Ni oleate D0 111.35 984 LDPE 1 % Ni oleate D1 111.13 975 LDPE 1 % Ni oleate D2 110.98 956 LDPE 1 % Ni oleate D3 110.78 937 LDPE 1 % Ni oleate D4 110.68 928 LDPE 1 % Ni oleate D5 110.28 899 LDPE 1 % Ni oleate D6 110.05 8410 LDPE 1 % Ni oleate D7 109.85 8111 LDPE 1 % Ni oleate D8 109.57 7412 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D0 111.28 9613 LDPE 3 % Ni oleate D1 111.16 9314 LDPE 3 % Ni oleate D2 111. 05 8915 LDPE 3 % Ni oleate D3 110.87 8616 LDPE 3 % Ni oleate D4 110.73 8317 LDPE 3 % Ni oleate D5 110.56 8118 LDPE 3 % Ni oleate D6 109.8 7819 LDPE 3 % Ni oleate D7 109.56 7620 LDPE 3 % Ni oleate D8 109.37 7120 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D0 111.19 9221 LDPE 5 % oleate Ni D1 111.06 8922 LDPE 5 % Ni oleate D2 110.89 8623 LDPE 5 % Ni oleate D3 110.65 8425 LDPE 5 % Ni oleate D4 110.58 8126 LDPE 5 % Ni oleate D5 110.23 7727 LDPE 5 % Ni oleate D6 109.76 7328 LDPE 5 % Ni oleate D7 109.48 7029 LDPE 5 % Ni oleate D8 109.23 66

Table 7: Effect of UV exposure on Melting point and Degree of crystallinity of Ni 12 hydroxyl oleate lended LDPE films.

before and after exposure to accelerated UV is presented in Table 6 and 7.

The virgin LDPE shows its melting point at 111.45˚C. On the

S.No. Sample ID Initial thermal decompo-sition temperature (˚C)

Ultimate decomposi-tion temperature (˚C)

1 LDPE VIRGIN 330 4942 LDPE 1 % Fe oleate D0 280 5003 LDPE 1 % Fe oleate D1 237 5044 LDPE 1 % Fe oleate D2 228 5055 LDPE 1 % Fe oleate D3 228 5076 LDPE 1 % Fe oleate D4 221 5137 LDPE 1 % Fe oleate D5 216 5168 LDPE 3 % Fe oleate D0 274 5109 LDPE 3 % Fe oleate D1 224 51410 LDPE 3 % Fe oleate D2 223 50011 LDPE 3 % Fe oleate D3 200 51012 LDPE 3 % Fe oleate D4 200 51813 LDPE 3 % Fe oleate D5 205 51514 LDPE 5 % Fe oleate D0 265 51215 LDPE 5 % Fe oleate D1 214 51916 LDPE 5 % Fe oleate D2 207 50117 LDPE 5 % Fe oleate D3 204 51618 LDPE 5 % Fe oleate D4 202 51919 LDPE 5 % Fe oleate D5 201 521

Table 8: Effect of UV Exposure on thermal degradation of Fe 12 hydroxyl oleate blended LDPE films.

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-6199.1000142



Page 10 of 13

S.No. Sample ID Initial decomposi-tion temperature (˚C)

Ultimate decomposi-tion temperature (˚C)

1 LDPE VIRGIN 330 494

2 LDPE- 1 %Ni oleateD0 319 5003 LDPE- 1 %Ni oleate D1 310 5044 LDPE 1 % Ni oleate D2 289 5055 LDPE 1 % Ni oleate D3 274 5076 LDPE 1 % Ni oleate D4 256 5137 LDPE 1 % Ni oleate D5 245 5158 LDPE 3 %Ni oleate D6 233 5169 LDPE 3 % Ni oleate D7 224 51810 LDPE 3 %Ni oleate D8 205 50011 LDPE 3 %Ni oleate D0 310 50412 LDPE 3%Ni oleate D1 301 50913 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D2 285 51014 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D3 275 51215 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D4 262 51516 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D5 250 51717 LDPE 3%Ni oleate D6 231 51918 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D7 218 52119 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D8 202 52520 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D0 301 50621 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D1 298 51122 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D2 281 51323 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D3 268 51424 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D4 259 51725 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D5 242 51926 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D6 225 52127 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D7 206 52528 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D8 189 527

Table 9: Effect of UV Exposure on thermal degradation of Ni-12 hydroxyl oleate blended LDPE films.

S.No. Sample Identification Luminous Transmittance Haze (%)1 LDPE VIRGIN 91 112 LDPE 1%Do 90 133 LDPE 1% Ni oleate D1 89 144 LDPE 1% Ni oleate D2 88 155 LDPE 1% Ni oleate D3 86 176 LDPE 1% Ni oleate D4 84 197 LDPE 1% Ni oleate D5 81 238 LDPE 1% Ni oleate D6 79 249 LDPE 1% Ni oleate D7 79 2710 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D0 81 1811 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D1 79 1912 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D2 78 2313 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D3 77 2514 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D4 75 2715 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D6 73 1916 LDPE 3% Ni oleate D7 Becomes Brittle Becomes Brittle17 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D0 80 2018 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D1 80 2219 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D2 78 2520 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D3 77 2721 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D4 74 2922 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D5 71 2923 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D6 Becomes Brittle Becomes Brittle24 LDPE 5% Ni oleate D7 Becomes Brittle Becomes Brittle

Table 11: Optical properties of LDPE- Ni 12 hydroxyl oleate samples before and after UV exposure.

S.No. Sample Identification Luminous Transmittance Haze (%)1 LDPE VIRGIN 90 132 LDPE 1% Fe oleate D0 89 153 LDPE 1% Fe oleate D1 85 174 LDPE 1% Fe oleate D2 84 195 LDPE 1% Fe oleate D3 77 236 LDPE 3% Fe oleate D0 86 287 LDPE 3% Fe oleate D1 84 188 LDPE 3% Fe oleate D2 76 229 LDPE 3% Fe oleate D3 72 2510 LDPE 5% Fe oleate D0 79 2511 LDPE 5% Fe oleate D1 73 2412 LDPE 5% Fe oleate D2 69 2613 LDPE 5% Fe oleate D3 68 2814 LDPE 1% Fe oleate D4 Becomes brittle15 LDPE 3% Fe oleate D4 Becomes brittle16 LDPE 5% Fe oleate D4 Becomes brittle

Table 10: Optical properties of LDPE - Fe 12 hydroxyl oleate samples before and after UV exposure.

of Fe 12-hydroxyl oleate and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate in LDPE films. It was observed that about 30˚C increase in ultimate decomposition temperature for LDPE films with 5% additive. This could be due to 5% additive contained the inorganic elements residual such as Fe and Ni. So the ultimate decomposition temperature increases on addition of Fe 12-hydroxyl oleate and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate.

Figure 11: virgin LDPE on Morphology.

Optical properties

The results of optical properties of Ferrous 12-hydroxyl oleate and Nickel 12-hydroxyl oleate blended LDPE before and after exposure to UV radiation are given in Table (10 and 11).

It is evident that with the increase in additive concentration there was a decrease in transmittance level, which is due to the carbonyl formation increases (absorption increases by light) in the process of photo oxidative degradation of LDPE film. LDPE film containing the percentage of oleate additive increases with increase in cloudy appearance of an otherwise transparent films caused by light scattered from within the films or from its surface. As the UV exposure time increases the percentage of additive increases the oxidative degradation. So haze is caused increases by surface imperfection (degradation),

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-6199.1000142



Page 11 of 13

(a) (b)

10 µm

(a)

Signal A - SE1Mag = 2.00 K X

EHT - 10.00 kVWD - 14.5 mm

Date :29 May 2010Time :14:22:09

(b)

Signal A = SE1Mag = 1.06 K X

EHT - 15.00 kVWD - 21.5 mm

Date :31 Jul 2010Time :14:52:02

Figure 12: Effect of M-oleate on Morphology 5%LDPE- Fe 12 hydroxyl oleate (a) and 5% Ni 12 hydroxyl leate (b) without UV Exposure Ni 12 hydroxyl oleate.

(a) (b)

20 µm

(a)

Signal A - SE1Mag = 587 X

EHT - 15.00 kVWD - 21.5 mm

Date :31 Jul 2010Time : 14:95:50

10 µm

(b)


EHT - 15.00 kVWD - 17.0 mm

Date : 22 Jun 2010Time: 17:11:03

Figure 13: Effect of M- oleate on Morphology 1% LDPE-Fe 12 hydroxyl oleate (a) and Ni 12 hydroxyl oleate (b) in the presence of one day UV Exposure.

(a) (b)

10 µm

(a)


EHT - 15.00 kVWD - 12.5 mm

Date :23 Jun 2010Time :11:52:32 10 µm

(b)


EHT - 16.00 kVWD - 21.6 mm

Date :31 Jul 2010Time :14:19:02

Figure 14: Effect of M- oleate on Morphology 3% LDPE-Fe 12 hydroxyl oleate (a) and Ni-12 hydroxyl leate (b) in the presence of one day UV Exposure.

http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-6199.1000142



Page 12 of 13

density changes (decreases) or inclusion that produces light scattering. In case of the films containing 5% additive possess low transmittance and high haze.

Morphology

Scanning electron micrograph (SEM): A comparative compilation of scanning electron micrographs of two samples (LDPE-Fe 12 hydroxyl oleate and LDPE-Ni 12 hydroxyl oleate) at magnification of 500 to 2000 was done. Figure 11 as is apparent from the surface of non degraded LDPE is smooth, without fractured and free from defects. Figure 12 (a,b) The SEM micrographs of LDPE Fe 12-hydroxyl oleate and LDPE Ni 12-hydroxyl blended films with 5% of additives show the uniform dispersion of additive in the polymer matrix. Figure 13-15 (a) shows the SEM of LDPE after 96 hours of UV degradation. It was observed that the surface developed some fractured and grooves due to UV exposure. However the extent of damage was much more pronounced in the samples containing Fe 12-hydroxyl oleate.

Figure 13-15 (b) shows the electron micrographs of Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate before and after UV exposure. The damage is more evident in this case and sample after 144 hours showed extensive grooves and pits as a result of UV irradiation. A 1000 fold magnification SEM photograph of Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate after 144 hours of UV exposure is displayed in figure 12 (b), where the deepening of the pit is more evident.

Elemental analysis

In Table 12 (a,b) C, H and N elemental analysis was reported. It can shows only the Carbon, Hydrogen and Nitrogen analysis. Carbon values of cellulose depends on carbon, where as hydrogen analysis is independent of the oxygen in molecular structure. By elemental analysis it shows carbon content as 84% than pure Fe and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate. This Oleate containing the percentage of Fe as 8.87% and as Ni 6.37%.

Biodegradation of the LDPE with Fe and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate

Figure 16 and Figure 17 shows conditions of reaction mixtures: Organ of compost; livestock excrement, municipal and Vegetable waste used, the method used for the determination of the biodegradability of the polyolefin’s was based on the International Standard (ASTMD 5338-98) that measures the evolved CO2 amount from both the blank vessel without a sample and the sample vessel including a 10g LDPE with Fe and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate samples. According to the experimental 2.9 ASTMD 5338 test procedure, Fragments occur progressively in the biodegradation of the photodegradaded films. Moreover, the biodegradation test results reveals that the Fe 12- hydroxyl oleate shows 21% and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate shows 19% of biodegradation on photodegradaded LDPE films when observed at the end of 45 days.

(a) (b)

20 µm

(a)

20 µmSignal A - SE1Mag = 609 X

EHT - 15.00 kVWD - 21.5 mm

Date :31 Jul 2010Time : 13:44:52

(b)

Signal A - SE1Mag = 802 X

EHT - 16.00 KVWD - 21.5 mm

Date :31 Jul 2010Time:14:39:29

Figure 15: Effect of M-oleate on Morphology 5% LDPE-Fe 12 hydroxyl oleate (a) and Ni 12 hydroxyloleate (b) in presence of one day UV Exposure.

Sample Cellulose (%)

1% LDPE (%)

3% LDPE (%)

5%LDPE (%)

Compost (%)

Carbon 84.47 86.22 84.36 84.36 14.32Hydrogen 14.96 14.98 14.89 14.43 1.74Nitrogen 0.11 0.06 0.10 0.15 1.54

Table 12 (a): Elemental analysis percentage of carbon, hydrogen, Nitrogen for LDPE-Fe 12 hydroxyl oleate.

Sample Cellulose (%)

1% LDPE (%)

3% LDPE (%)

5% LDPE (%)

Compost (%)

Carbon 84.47 86.22 84.36 85.36 13.32Hydrogen 14.96 14.86 13.89 14.67 1.83Nitrogen 0.11 0.06 0.11 0.16 1.50

Table 12 (b): Elemental analysis percentage of carbon, hydrogen, Nitrogen for LDPE- Ni 12 hydroxyl oleate.

Reaction temperature 58 ± 2˚CDry solid (%) 52%Volatile solid (%) 19%Air flow rate 100 ml/minTest duration (day) 45 dayReference material CelluloseVolume of reaction vessel 2000mlMoisture percentage in compost 28 %

Composting vessel (material with test medium)

pH (before biodegrada-tion)

pH (after biodegradation)

1. LDPE- Fe 12-hydroxyloleate 7.7 7.92. LDPE- Ni 12-hydroxyloleate 7.5 7.83. Blank 7.4 7.74. Postive (cellulose) 7.6 8.15. Negative (PE film) 7.6 7.8



Page 13 of 13

ConclusionThe rate of photo degradation on LDPE film is very high at

higher concentration of Fe and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate. LDPE films containing 5% Fe 12-hydroxyl oleate has shown highest degradation in mechanical, thermal properties and reduction in degree of crystallinity when compared to 5% Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate on UV exposure. The FTIR analysis shows that a peak at around 1712 cm-1 corresponding to carbonyl group of transition metal 12-hydroxyl oleate was observed for LDPE films with 1%, 3% and 5% additive. The SEM micrographs indicate the fractured surface and brittle mode on films after UV exposure. The present study indicates that the Fe and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate promote the photodegradation of LDPE film and in the following order. Fe 12-hydroxyl oleate > Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate. It can be concluded that besides oleate content, the metal also plays a vital role in photodegradation of polyethylene films and also comparison of the photodegraded films were subjected to biodegradation. Fragments occur progressively in the biodegradation of the photodegradaded films. Moreover, the biodegradation test results reveals that the Fe 12-hydroxyl oleate shows 21% and Ni 12-hydroxyl oleate shows 19%

celluloseLDPE 1 % Fe oleateLDPE 3 % Fe oleateLDPE 5 % Fe oleate

The percentage of biodegradation100

90

80

70 60

50

40

30

20

10

01 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47

Bio

degr

adat

ion

Figure 16: The percentage of biodegradation of LDPE-Fe 12 hydroxyl oleate for 45 days.

The percentage of biodegradation

Cellulose

BIO

DEG

RA

DAT

ION

DAYS

LDPE 1 % Ni

LDPE 3 % Ni

LDPE 5% Ni

100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

1 4 7 1013 16 19 22 25 2831 34 37 40 43

oleate

oleate

oleate

%

Figure 17: The percentage of biodegradation of LDPE- Ni 12 hydroxyl ole-ate for 45 days.

of biodegradation on photodegradaded LDPE films when observed at the end of 45 days.

Acknowledgements

Funding of this work by the Department of Science and Technology, grant number. DST/TSG/WP/2006/58 is gratefully acknowledged.

References

1. Rabek JF (1995) Polymer Photo degradation mechanisms and experimental methods. London: Chapman and hall.

2. Yamashita T, Watanabe M, Kojima R, Shiragami T, Shima K, et al. (1998) Benzophenone- photosensitized alkylation of arylalkenes with acetone, dimethyl sulfoxide, and their related compounds in the presence of tert-butylamine. J Photochem and Photobiol A: Chemistry 118: 165-171.

3. Kani R, Nakano Y, Yoshida H, Hayase S (1998) Photosensitization of Base-Developable Poly(phenylhydrosilane) with 3,3‘,4,4‘-Tetra(tert-butylperoxycar-bonyl)benzophenone. Mechanism of the Drastic Photosensitization in Terms of Photoinduced Electron Transfer. Macromolecules 31: 8794-8801.

4. Grassino SB, Strumia MC (1998) Novel UV-autocurable methacrylo- urethane polymeric films derived from m-digallic acid: Preparation and characterization. J Appl Polym Sci 70: 2575-2583.

5. Shield SR, Harris JM (1998) Time-Resolved Fluorescence Monitoring of Aromatic Radicals in Photoinitiated Processes. Anal Chem 70: 2576-2583.

6. Bevington JC, Breuer SW, Huckerby TN, Hunt BJ, Jones R (1998) Further study of fluorinated derivatives of benzoyl peroxide as initiators of radical polymerizations: kinetic chain lengths and related quantities. Eur Polym J 34: 539-542.

7. Jiang DD, Wilkie CA (1998) Graft copolymerization of methacrylic acid, acrylic acid and methyl acrylate onto styrene-butadiene block copolymer. Eur Polym J 34: 997-1006.

8. Srivastava S, Yourd E, Toscano JP (1998) Structural differences between pp* and np* Acetophenone triplet excited states as revealed by time-resolved IR Spectroscopy. J Am Chem Soc 120: 6173-6174.

9. Lu Z, Huang X, Huang J (1998) Synthesis and characterization of amphiphilic diblock copolymer of polystyrene and polyvinyl alcohol using ethanolamine–benzophenone as photochemical binary initiation system. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem 36: 109-115.

10. Oatsis Jr JE, Knapp DR (1998) Synthesis and photochemistry of two cleavable heterobifunctional benzophenone protein crosslinkers. Tetrahedron Lett 39: 1665-1668.

11. Langer NM, Wilkie CA (1998) Surface modification of polyamide-6: graft copolymerization of vinyl monomers onto polyamide-6 and thermal analysis of the graft copolymers. Polym Adv Technol 9: 290-296.

12. D’Auria M, Racioppi R (1998) Photochemical dimerization of esters of urocanic acid. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 112: 145-148.

13. Rabek JF (1987) Mechanisms of photophysical process and photochemical reactions in polymers. Theory and applications. Chichester: Wile39.

14. Rabek JF, Allen.N (1993) Polymer photodegradation mechanisms and experimental methods. London Chapman and Hall.

15. Osawa Z, kurisu N, Nagahima K, Nankano K (1979) The effect of transistion metal stearates on the photodegradation of polyethylene. J Appl Polym Sci 23: 3583-3590.

16. Jakubowicz I (2003) Evaluation of degradability of biodegradable polyethylene (PE). Polym Degrad Stab 80: 39-43.

17. International standard ASTMD 5338-98 (2003) Compost biodegradation Evaluation of the ultimate aerobic Biodegradability of plastic material in method by analysis of released carbon dioxide an aqueous medium.

18. Gulmine JV, Janissek PR, Heise HM, Akcerlrud L (2003) Degradation profile of polyethylene after artificial accelerated weathering. Polym Degrad Stab 79: 385-397.

19. Khabbaz F, Albertsson AC, Karlsson S (1999) Chemical and morphological changes of environmentally degradable polyethylene films exposed to thermo-oxidation. Polym Degrad Stab 63: 127-138.

20. Qureshi FS, Amin MB, Maadhah AG, Hamid SH (1990) Weather induced degradation of linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE): mechanical properties. J polym Eng 9: 67-84.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010603098003785

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ma980881i

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-4628%2819981226%2970:13%3C2575::AID-APP3%3E3.0.CO;2-3/abstract

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21644777


http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001430579700222X

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-0518%2819980115%2936:1%3C109::AID-POLA15%3E3.0.CO;2-N/abstract


http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-1581%28199805%299:5%3C290::AID-PAT756%3E3.0.CO;2-P/abstract

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S101060309700292X

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/app.1979.070231214/abstract



http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/els/01413910/1999/00000063/00000001/art00082

http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/polyeng.1990.9.1/polyeng.1990.9.1.67/polyeng.1990.9.1.67.xml

Documents

Journal of r Bior emediation & Biodegradation · Ammonium iron (II) sulphate hexahydrate and Ammonium Nickel (II) sulphate hexahydrate, sodium hydroxide, Ricinoleic acid . were used