Joint Status Report 051112

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/31/2019 Joint Status Report 051112

    1/7

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    STATE OF TEXAS,

    Plaintiff,

    v.

    ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in his official capacity as

    Attorney General of the United States,

    Defendant.

    ERIC KENNIE, et al.,

    Defendant-Intervenors,

    TEXAS STATE CONFERENCE OF NAACPBRANCHES, et al.,

    Defendant-Intervenors,

    TEXAS LEAGUE OF YOUNG VOTERS

    EDUCATION FUND, et al.,

    Defendant-Intervenors.

    TEXAS LEGISLATIVE BLACK CAUCUS, et

    al.,

    Defendant-Intervenors,

    VICTORIA RODRIGUEZ, et al.,

    Defendant-Intervenors.

    )

    )

    )))

    )

    ))

    )

    ))

    )

    )

    ))

    )

    ))

    )

    ))

    )

    ))

    ))

    ))

    )

    ))

    )

    ))

    )

    CASE NO. 1:12-CV-00128(RMC-DST-RLW)

    Three-Judge Court

    JOINT STATUS REPORT CONCERNING DATABASE DISCOVERY

    Pursuant to this Courts May 7, 2012 Order (Doc. 107), the parties jointly submit a report

    in order to advise the Court of the status of database discovery.

    The State of Texas

    Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 119 Filed 05/11/12 Page 1 of 7

  • 7/31/2019 Joint Status Report 051112

    2/7

    2

    The State of Texas produced the data requested by the Department of Justice from the

    Drivers License System Database, the License to Carry Handgun Database and the T.E.A.M.

    Database by May 4 and May 9, in accordance with the Courts order. Counsel for the

    Department of Justice has posed additional questions regarding information pertaining to the

    drivers license database and the State of Texas intends to provide the requested information as

    soon as possible. However, counsel for DOJ has confirmed this is not a production issue.

    The State of Texas produced ten sets of the data requested by the Defendant-Intervenors

    from the Drivers License System database and the License to Carry Handgun database on May

    8, 2012, in accordance with the Courts order. The State of Texas produced ten sets of the data

    requested by the Defendant-Intervenors from the T.E.A.M. database on May 9, 2012, in

    accordance with the Courts order. Production of the data requested by Defendant-Intervenors

    has been completed.

    The State of Texas received notice today, May 11, that Defendant-Intervenors are having

    trouble accessing data files containing the Drivers License System data only; disks that contain

    large files with tens of millions of records. It is unclear to the State of Texas the particular

    problem Defendant-Intervenors IT expert is having with accessing the data, but no data other

    than Social Security numbers was omitted from the agreed fields and the problem is likely an

    issue of not being able to access the data provided. In addition, IT staff at the Office of Attorney

    General was able to access data in an exact copy of the disk that Defendant-Intervenors report

    difficulties accessing. Nevertheless, the State of Texas stands ready and willing to try and assist

    Defendant-Intervenors IT expert with problems he is having with accessing the data contained

    on one of the disks. Finally, Defendant-Intervenors request for the identity of Texass database

    expert is completely baseless.

    Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 119 Filed 05/11/12 Page 2 of 7

  • 7/31/2019 Joint Status Report 051112

    3/7

    3

    The Attorney General

    The Attorney General believes that he has in his possession complete copies of the fields

    contained within the Voter Registration Database, the Driver License Database, and the License

    to Carry Database necessary to match to the extent possible registered voters to individuals

    holding photographic identification necessary under S.B. 14 in the form of a Texas Driver

    License, Texas Identification Card, or a Texas License to Carry a Concealed Handgun. The

    Attorney General has posed five outstanding questions to counsel for the State of Texas, and

    Texas has not yet answered these queries. The answers to these additional questions will clarify

    how to properly use and interpret the databases provided. Therefore, although the Attorney

    General presently anticipates that additional versions of the databases will not be required, he

    cannot be wholly certain that he has in his possession all of the information necessary to

    interpret, compare, or match the databases until these questions are answered.

    Defendant-Intervenors

    An expert retained by Defendant-Intervenors, Professor Gary King of Harvard

    University, has reviewed the extracts produced this week to Defendant-Intervenors by the State

    of Texas of the drivers license database, the TEAM (voter registration and voter history)

    database, and the License to Carry Concealed Handgun (LCCH) database. As set forth in

    Professor Kings declaration and as explained below, he has determined that one of the database

    extracts for the drivers license database is non-compliant in that it is not usable for

    conducting data analyses relevant to this litigation. There is a second issue with the LCCH,

    which we believe has been resolved, but the expert had not had an opportunity to review new

    information produced by the State on that issue as of the time of filing.

    Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 119 Filed 05/11/12 Page 3 of 7

  • 7/31/2019 Joint Status Report 051112

    4/7

    4

    Drivers license database: The data provided from this database are substantially

    incomplete. The State omitted from the database extract the records for about 20 percent of the

    individuals who hold a license or state ID in Texas.

    The State has represented that this database, overall, includes approximately 25 million

    unique license and ID holders. The database extract produced to Intervenors provides data in

    four files (each file includes different data fields, except for one common reference field in

    each); the principal file is the person file (with 25 fields that hold data). That file in the

    version produced to the Intervenors includes only approximately 20 million records

    (19,926,894), not 25 million.

    1

    LCCH database: Defendant-Intervenors initially identified a problem with the LCCH

    database, in that this database had been provided without a record layout. Shortly before this

    submission, the State provided Defendant-Intervenors with a record layout, which Defendant-

    Intervenors believe will resolve the problem, but their expert had not had a chance to review the

    newly-produced documents at the time of filing.

    In this regard, the same file, as produced to the Justice

    Department (with more expansive information relating to social security numbers), does include

    approximately 25 million records. In short, Intervenors have not been provided records for about

    five million unique holders of a license of ID. Thus, about twenty percent of the necessary data

    are missing.

    A final issue that Intervenors wish to bring to the Courts attention is that, in order to

    comply with the Courts order regarding the identification of database problems, and because, in

    particular, of the States production of a non-compliant drivers license database, the end result is

    1 This file appears to be corrupted and is producing a computer error message when the file is unzipped.

    Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 119 Filed 05/11/12 Page 4 of 7

  • 7/31/2019 Joint Status Report 051112

    5/7

    5

    that Intervenors now have identified to the State the identity of their database expert. Intervenors

    respectfully request, therefore, that the Court require the State to identify any database expert it

    has retained.

    Date: May 11, 2012

    Respectfully submitted,

    RONALD C. MACHEN, JR. THOMAS E. PEREZ

    United States Attorney Assistant Attorney GeneralDistrict of Columbia Civil Rights Division

    /s/ Daniel J. Freeman

    T. CHRISTIAN HERREN, JR.

    MEREDITH BELL-PLATTSELIZABETH S. WESTFALLBRUCE I. GEAR

    JENNIFER L. MARANZANO

    DANIEL J. FREEMANAttorneys

    Voting Section, Civil Rights Division

    U.S. Department of Justice

    950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20530

    (800) 253-3931

    Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 119 Filed 05/11/12 Page 5 of 7

  • 7/31/2019 Joint Status Report 051112

    6/7

    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

    I hereby certify that on May 11, 2012, I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing via

    the Courts ECF system on the following counsel of record:

    Jonathan Franklin MitchellAdam W. Aston

    Matthew Hamilton FrederickOffice of the Attorney General of Texas

    [email protected]

    [email protected]@oag.state.tx.us

    Counsel for Plaintiff

    J. Gerald Hebert

    [email protected]

    Chad W. Dunn

    Brazil & Dunn

    [email protected]

    Counsel for Kennie Intervenors

    Debo P. AdegbileLeah C. Aden

    Ryan Haygood

    Dale E. HoNatasha Korgaonkar

    NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund

    [email protected]@naacpldf.org

    [email protected]

    [email protected]@naacpldf.org

    Counsel for Texas League of Young Voters

    Intervenors

    Jon M. GreenbaumMark A. Posner

    Lawyers Committee for Civil [email protected]

    [email protected]

    Ezra David Rosenberg

    Dechert LLP

    [email protected]

    Robert Stephen Notzon

    [email protected]

    Counsel for NAACP Intervenors

    John [email protected]

    Nancy G. Abudu

    M. Laughlin McDonaldKatie OConnor

    Arthur B. Spitzer

    Michelle Hart YearyAmerican Civil Liberties Union

    [email protected]

    [email protected]@gmail.com

    Counsel Texas Legislative Black Caucus

    Intervenors

    Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 119 Filed 05/11/12 Page 6 of 7

  • 7/31/2019 Joint Status Report 051112

    7/7

    Nina Perales

    Amy PedersonMexican American Legal Defense &

    Educational Fund, Inc.

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

    Counsel for Rodriguez Intervenors

    /s/ Daniel J. Freeman

    DANIEL J. FREEMAN

    U.S. Department of Justice

    950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

    Washington, D.C. [email protected]

    Case 1:12-cv-00128-RMC-DST-RLW Document 119 Filed 05/11/12 Page 7 of 7