17
Arctic RIMS & WALE (Regional, Integrated Hydrological Monitoring System & Western Arctic Linkage Experiment) John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running NTSG Univ. of Montana March 28, 2006 http://rims.unh.edu/data.sh http://wale.unh.edu/

John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running NTSG Univ. of Montana March 28, 2006

  • Upload
    harmon

  • View
    37

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

http://wale.unh.edu/. http://rims.unh.edu/data.shtml. Arctic RIMS & WALE (Regional, Integrated Hydrological Monitoring System & Western Arctic Linkage Experiment). John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running NTSG Univ. of Montana March 28, 2006. http://wale.unh.edu/. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running NTSG Univ. of Montana March 28, 2006

Arctic RIMS & WALE(Regional, Integrated Hydrological Monitoring System &

Western Arctic Linkage Experiment)

John Kimball

FaithAnn Heinsch

Steve Running

NTSG Univ. of Montana

March 28, 2006

http://rims.unh.edu/data.shtml

http://wale.unh.edu/

Page 2: John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running NTSG Univ. of Montana March 28, 2006

Arctic RIMS & WALE(Regional, Integrated Hydrological Monitoring System &

Western Arctic Linkage Experiment)

Biome-BGC v.4.1.2

Inputs (25-km resolution):

• Meteorology– NCEP, 1980-2002

• Elevation– GTOPO

• Soils– FAO Soil Texture– Rooting Depth http://rims.unh.edu/data.shtml

http://wale.unh.edu/

Page 3: John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running NTSG Univ. of Montana March 28, 2006

Arctic RIMS & WALE(Regional, Integrated Hydrological Monitoring System &

Western Arctic Linkage Experiment)

Biome-BGC Land Covers:

• C3 Grass• Deciduous Broadleaf Forest• Deciduous Needleleaf Forest• Boreal Evergreen Needleleaf Forest

• Sedge (moist) Tundra• Tussock (dry) Tundra)

Page 4: John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running NTSG Univ. of Montana March 28, 2006

Biome-BGC Tundra EcophysiologyParameter C3 Grass Tussock Tundra Sedge Tundra

Whole Plant Mortality Fraction 0.05 0.01 0.01

Fire Mortality Fraction 0.01 0.002 0.002

New fine root C : New leaf C 2.0 2.5 1.5

C:N of leaves 28.1 30.0 25.0

C:N of leaf litter, after translocation 45.8 91.7 33.5

C:N of fine roots 50.0 50.0 37.0

Leaf litter labile /cellulose/lignin proportion

0.39 / 0.44 / 0.17 0.39 / 0.44 / 0.17 0.51 / 0.44 / 0.05

Fine root labile /cellulose/lignin proportion

0.68 / 0.23 / 0.09 0.30 / 0.45 / 0.25 0.80 / 0.12 / 0.08

Canopy water interception coeff. 0.01 0.021 0.021

Canopy light extinction coeff. 0.48 0.6 0.6

Specific leaf area 65.0 45.0 45

Fraction of leaf N in Rubisco 0.32 0.20 0.20

Maximum stomatal conductance 0.006 0.005 0.005

Cuticular conductance 0.00006 0.00001 0.00001

Leaf water potential: start of / complete conductance reduction

-0.73 / -2.70 -0.7 / -3.5 -0.7 / -3.5

VPD: start of / complete conductance reduction

1000 / 5000 930 / 4100 930 / 4100

Page 5: John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running NTSG Univ. of Montana March 28, 2006

Wetland-BGC

• Has a 2-layer soil model:– Unsaturated & saturated layers– Dynamic changes (3 cases)

• No saturation of rooting depth• Partial saturation of rooting depth• Total saturation of rooting depth

• Provides water from saturated layer using capillary rise function from latest version of RHESSys (based on principles of hydraulic conductivity & depth to saturation)

• At present, only affects carbon pools

Page 6: John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running NTSG Univ. of Montana March 28, 2006

Year Tower Biome-BGC1999 -0.75 (+1.77) -0.24 (+0.37)2000 -0.37 (+0.62) -0.01 (+0.55)2001 -0.51 (+0.72) +0.17 (+0.47)

Average Summer NEE (gC m-2 d-1)

Date

1/1/2000 4/1/2000 7/1/2000 10/1/2000 1/1/2001

NE

E (

gC

m-2

d-1

)

-3.0

-2.0

-1.0

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

Tower

Biome-BGC, gwd = 5 cm

C source (+)

C sink (-)

20002000

Date

1/1/2001 4/1/2001 7/1/2001 10/1/2001 1/1/2002

NE

E (

gC

m-2

d-1

)

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

Tower

Biome-BGC, gwd = 5 cm

C source (+)

C sink (-)

20012001

NEE: Biome-BGC vs. Tower, Barrow, AKNEE: Biome-BGC vs. Tower, Barrow, AK

Page 7: John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running NTSG Univ. of Montana March 28, 2006

gwd = 0 cmgwd = 1 cmgwd - 5 cmgwd = 10 cmgwd = 20 cmgwd = 50 cm

Julian Day

1/1/1995 7/1/1995 1/1/1996

Cu

mu

lati

ve N

EE

(gC

m-2

)

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

Date

1/1/1995 7/1/1995 1/1/1996

Air

Tem

per

atu

re

-50

-25

0

25

Precip

itation

(cm)

0

2

4

6

8

Wet Sedge Wet Sedge Tundra: Tundra:

Barrow, AK, 1995Barrow, AK, 1995Varying Varying

Groundwater Groundwater Depth (gwd)Depth (gwd)

Page 8: John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running NTSG Univ. of Montana March 28, 2006

Year

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

Annual P

recipitation (cm)

0

5

10

15

20

25

Ave

rage

Day

time

Tem

pera

ture

(de

g C

)

-20.0

-17.5

-15.0

-12.5

-10.0

-7.5

-5.0

PrecipitationTemperature

Year

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

NP

P (

gC m

-2 y

-1)

100

150

200

250

300

Year

1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

So

il C

arb

on

Po

ol (

gC m

-2)

114.82

114.84

114.86

114.88

114.90NPP and Soil Carbon, Barrow TowerNPP and Soil Carbon, Barrow Tower

Page 9: John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running NTSG Univ. of Montana March 28, 2006

Biome-BGC ResultsBiome-BGC Results

Julian Day

0 60 120 180 240 300 360

Cu

mu

lati

ve N

PP

(gC

m-2

d-1

)

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Average1956 - minimum productivity1998 - maximum productivity

Julian Day

0 60 120 180 240 300 360

Cu

mu

lati

ve N

EE

(gC

m-2

d-1

)

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

C source (+)

C sink (-)

BarrowBarrow

Julian Day

0 60 120 180 240 300 360C

um

ula

tive

NP

P(g

C m

-2 d

-1)

0

50

100

150

Average1993 - minimum productivity1989 - maximum productivity

Julian Day

0 60 120 180 240 300 360

Cu

mu

lati

ve N

EE

(gC

m-2

d-1

)

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

C source (+)

C sink (-)

AtqasukAtqasuk

Page 10: John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running NTSG Univ. of Montana March 28, 2006

ConclusionsConclusions• Spatial and temporal patterns of tundra NEE and component

photosynthetic and respiration processes are strongly regulated by soil moisture.

• Interannual variability in vegetation productivity and net C exchange is on the order of 99% (15.9 gC m-2 y-1) and 19% (37.3 gC m-2 y-1), respectively.

• Soil heterotrophic respiration is a large component of pan-Arctic NEE.

• Moderate decreases in groundwater depth promote soil decomposition and respiration during the growing season, but increased respiration is partially offset by increased vegetation productivity.

• The tundra carbon cycle response to climate change appears to be non-linear and strongly coupled to surface hydrology and nitrogen availability.

Page 11: John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running NTSG Univ. of Montana March 28, 2006

AMSR-E Daily Tb (L2A Product)

Daily Surface Temp. (Ts)in o C

Daily Surface Soil Moisture(mv) in %

8-Day Composite temporalTs and mv

Arctic Land CoverMap

Arctic Biome Property LUTSLA, Kltr,mx, Ksoil,mx

MODIS Monthly Max. LAIComposites LAImx, LAIgs,mn

MODIS SpatialResampling

MODIS 8-Day NPP(NPP8-day)

MODIS Annual NPP(NPPann)

Multipliers (Wmult, Tmult) Class-specific rate curves

mv Ts

Klit,adj = Klit,mx * Wmult * TmultKsoil,adj = Ksoil,mx * Wmult * Tmult

Litterfall=2.22 (LAImx - LAIgs,mn) * SLA-1

Clitr = (LAImx - LAIgs,mn) * SLA-1

Rh,8-day=(Clai*Klaiadj )+(Clitr*Klitr,adj)+(Csoil*Ksoil,adj)

Arctic ActiveLayer

Soil C poolMap (Csoil)

NEE8-day = (NPP8-day - Rh,8-day) Rh,ann= (Rh,8-day)i

NEEann = (NPPann - Rh,ann)

Satellite-based mapping and monitoring of Pan-Arctic Rh, NEE and surface soil temperature andmoisture controls to CO2 respiration.

45

1i

Wmult Tmult

Page 12: John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running NTSG Univ. of Montana March 28, 2006

Land surface temperature derived using AMSR-E 6.9 GHz H and V Polarization. We also have compared the differences among different approaches and channels and MODIS Aqua LST, The atmospheric effect, in emissivity vary differently depending on the channels. In the arctic environment, the upper layers of soil are frozen, and the thermal inertia of below-ground (permafrost) effect develops low soil temperature. Our model produces reliable soil temperature using microwave data. AMSR-E 6.9 and 36.6 GHz channels are sensitive to temperature change.

AMSRE 6.9 GHz Land Surface Temperature (LUT) on May 25, 2003

Page 13: John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running NTSG Univ. of Montana March 28, 2006

240

250

260

270

280

290

300

1/1 2/10 3/21 4/30 6/9 7/19 8/28 10/7 11/16 12/26

Date

So

il T

em

pe

ratu

re (

K)

AMSR Ts BGC Tsoil Tower Tsoil

Soil temperature comparison at Barrow for 2003 (Fily approach, AMSRE 6.9 GHz, 8-day average)

Page 14: John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running NTSG Univ. of Montana March 28, 2006

Daily surface moisture and surface temperature derived from satellite microwave remote sensing are used as the primary controls to Rh. The map shows maximum surface moisture during 2002–04 for the pan-Arctic domain, as derived from AMSR-E L3 daily C- and X-band data.

AMSR-E Maximum Soil Moisture during 2002-04

Page 15: John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running NTSG Univ. of Montana March 28, 2006

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

1/1 2/10 3/21 4/30 6/9 7/19 8/28 10/7 11/16 12/26

Date

g C

m-2

d-1

Carbon Model with AMSR and MODIS BGC Tower

+Source

-Sink

Comparative carbon source/sink among the model estimated using MODIS and AMSR-E data, Northern Black Spruce Ameriflux tower site-observed data and BIOME-BGC model calculated using local meteorology data for 2003.

Page 16: John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running NTSG Univ. of Montana March 28, 2006

SSM/I Spring Thaw Timing vs Net CO2 Exchange

(Alaska-Yukon; 1988-2000)

R2 = 0.585; P < 0.002-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

40

-20 -10 0 10 20

Spring thaw anomaly (days)

NE

P a

no

ma

ly (

g C

m-2 y

r-1)

Net CO2 exchange (Biome-BGC)

Higher NEE (+)

Lower NEE (-)

SSM/I-derived timing of spring thaw and annual C cycle anomalies (1988–2001) depicted by the regional ecosystem process model (Biome-BGC) simulations of NEE for Alaska.

Page 17: John Kimball FaithAnn Heinsch Steve Running NTSG Univ. of Montana March 28, 2006

The microwave derived surface temperature and soil moisture used to estimate NEE at the boreal-Arctic region and validated using flux tower sites and RIIMS 25km meteorology. The map shows pan-Arctic daily NEE on June 26, 2003.

Biome-BGC Model Derived Daily NEE June 26, 2003