20
Joe Baca, Travis Cano, Ray Pasco, A.J. Quartararo ACME WIDGETS

Joe Baca, Travis Cano, Ray Pasco, A.J. Quartararo ACME WIDGETS

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Joe Baca, Travis Cano,

Ray Pasco, A.J. Quartararo

ACME WIDGETS

BACKGROUND INFORMATION• Tracking hardware/software assets

• Collect and manage information

• Computers, Printers, and Software

• Initial method not multiuser and scalable

• $100,000 budget for a six month project

• Covers the cost of labor, new hardware/software, and training

PROBLEM DEFINITION• MS Excel and Access

• Company has two locations now

• New system needs to be multiuser, scalable

• Minimizing Change in Work Assignments

• Union must approve

• Ensures greater acceptance

• Main issue lies with equipment used and process to maintain quality data

• A technical solution is necessary

CURRENT SYSTEM DEFINITION• Software inventory tracked in MS Excel

• Hardware inventory tracked in MS Access

• The system operates on individual computers

• The files are shared among managers and technicians on a central server

• No way to track when a file is being modified

PIECES FRAMEWORK• Performance – Files located on a server where managers can update them, as

long as someone else is not doing so. Makes difficult to coordinate between two sites

• Information – Asset information stored in two different file types. Hard to combine reports

• Economics – Budget is $100,000

• Control – Managers can update files, but must assume that no one else is trying to do the same

• Efficiency – Two different file types diminishes efficiency of information and generating reports. Collaboration is difficult on current system

• Service – Current system can lead to inconsistencies in data as managers at multiple sites update files located on a central server

FISHBONE DIAGRAM

PROJECT FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT• Operational – Proposed solution satisfies the system requirements

• Cultural/Political – Obtaining input from managers both willing and unwilling to change

• Technical – New system is technically feasible

• Schedule – Six month timeline is adequate. If need arises, this could be pushed back

• Economic – Expected cost is $86,500. This allows for about $13,500 of cost overrun.

• Legal – Union approval is possible with the proper channels. Minimal impact to work assignments will aid in this process.

PROJECT FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENTDevelopment Costs

Personnel:2Systems Analysts ($50.00/hour) $30,0002Programmer/Analysts ($35.00/hour ea) $19,0001GUI Designer ($40.00/hour) $5,0001Telecommuncations ($50.00/hour) $2,5001System Architect ($50.00/hour) $6,0001Database Specialist ($45.00/hour) $5001System Librarian ($15.00/hour) $2,000

Expenses:Training $3,500

New Hardware & Software1Development Server $10,0001Server Software (operating system, etc) $3,0001DBMS Server Software $2,000

Client Software $3,000

Total Development Costs $86,500

Projected Annual Operating CostsPersonnel:

2Programmer/Analysts ($35.00/hr) $40,0001System Librarian $6,000

Expenses:1Maintenance for server $1,0001Maintenance for DBMS Software $1,000

Total Projected Annual Costs $48,000

PROJECT PLAN• Design the interface using an in-house database

• Allow access via a website that allows multiple users and continuously updates, and allows simultaneous updates

• Both locations will have the latest data

RECOMMENDATIONS• Web based solution that will allow multi-user access

• Continuous update across locations

• Satisfy manager request to stay in house

• Iterate implementation and test at one location first

• Offer training in order to ensure proper system use

ERD DIAGRAM

SYSTEM OUTPUT

SYSTEM OUTPUT

USER INTERFACE

USER INTERFACE

APPENDIX

PIECES FRAMEWORK• Performance – Files located on a server where managers can update them, as

long as someone else is not doing so. Makes difficult to coordinate between two sites

• Information – Asset information stored in two different file types. Hard to combine reports

• Economics – Budget is $100,000

• Control – Managers can update files, but must assume that no one else is trying to do the same

• Efficiency – Two different file types diminishes efficiency of information and generating reports. Collaboration is difficult on current system

• Service – Current system can lead to inconsistencies in data as managers at multiple sites update files located on a central server

FISHBONE DIAGRAM

PROJECT FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENTDevelopment Costs

Personnel:2Systems Analysts ($50.00/hour) $30,0002Programmer/Analysts ($35.00/hour ea) $19,0001GUI Designer ($40.00/hour) $5,0001Telecommuncations ($50.00/hour) $2,5001System Architect ($50.00/hour) $6,0001Database Specialist ($45.00/hour) $5001System Librarian ($15.00/hour) $2,000

Expenses:Training $3,500

New Hardware & Software1Development Server $10,0001Server Software (operating system, etc) $3,0001DBMS Server Software $2,000

Client Software $3,000

Total Development Costs $86,500

Projected Annual Operating CostsPersonnel:

2Programmer/Analysts ($35.00/hr) $40,0001System Librarian $6,000

Expenses:1Maintenance for server $1,0001Maintenance for DBMS Software $1,000

Total Projected Annual Costs $48,000

THANK YOU