Jeremy-Grantham-Starving-for-Facts-—-The-American-Magazine Dec12

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 Jeremy-Grantham-Starving-for-Facts--The-American-Magazine Dec12

    1/3

    By Vaclav SmilWednesday, December 5, 2012

    Filed under: Science & Technology

    Jeremy Grantham, a well-known presence in the

    financial world, recently published a World View

    column in the journal Nature in which he concludes

    that, simply, we are running out of almost all

    commodities whose consumption sustains modern

    civilization. There is nothing new about such claims,

    and since the emergence of a vocal global peak oil

    movement during the late 1990s, many other minerals

    have been added to the endangered list. Indeed, thereis now a book calledPeak Everything. What makes

    Granthams column published under the alarmist

    headline Be Persuasive. Be Brave. Be Arrested (If Necessary) worth noticing, and

    deconstructing, is that he puts his claims in terms more suitable for tabloids than for one of the

    worlds oldest and most prestigious scientific weekly magazines.

    His direst example is the impending shortage of two fertilizers: phosphorus (phosphate) and

    potassium (potash). These two elements cannot be made, cannot be substituted, are necessary to

    grow all life forms, and are mined and depleted. Its a scary set of statements. What happens

    when these fertilizers run out is a question I cant get satisfactorily answered and, believe me, I

    have tried. Well, he could have tried just a bit harder: an Internet search would have led him, inmere seconds, to World Phosphate Rock Reserves and Resources, a study published in 2010 by

    the International Fertilizer Development Center (IFDC) and funded by the U.S. Agency for

    International Development.

    This detailed assessment of the worlds phosphate reserves (that are the part of a wider category

    of resources that is recoverable with existing techniques and at acceptable cost) concluded that

    they are adequate to produce fertilizer for the next 300 to 400 years. As with all mineral resource

    appraisals (be they of crude oil or rare earths), the studys conclusions can be criticized and

    questioned, and the statement by the Global Phosphorus Research Initiative is perhaps the best

    my Grantham, Starving for Facts The American Magazine http://www.american.com/archive/2012/december/jeremy-granth

    12/9/2012

  • 8/13/2019 Jeremy-Grantham-Starving-for-Facts--The-American-Magazine Dec12

    2/3

    document of that kind. But even the most conservative interpretation of IFDCs assessment shows

    that phosphates have a reserve/production ratio well in excess of 100 years, higher than that of

    many other critical mineral resources.

    Grantham could have also checked the standard, and the most often quoted, sourcebooks on the

    worlds mineral resources, Mineral Commodity Summaries, published annually by the U.S.

    Geological Survey (USGS). In the latest edition, he would have found that the USGS made

    significant revisions to its phosphate rock reserves data for Morocco, Russia, Algeria, Senegal, and

    Syria, and that it now puts the global reserve/production ratio at about 370 years. Or he could haveconsulted the materials put out by the International Fertilizer Industry Association, whose members

    include many of the worlds most prominent fertilizer producers, traders, and shippers. The

    association (emphasis in the original) does not believe that peak phosphorus is a pressing

    issue, or that phosphate rock depletion is imminent. Nevertheless, it believes that efforts to

    minimize phosphorus losses to the environment and optimize phosphorus use should be

    encouraged.

    And that is precisely as it should be, because wasteful use of all kinds of fertilizers is common and

    optimizing the applications brings substantial monetary and environmental rewards (phosphates

    are a major cause of aquatic eutrophication, their worst effects are persistent dead zones in manycoastal areas around the world). Larger gains in reducing phosphate applications could be made by

    moderating typical per capita meat consumption, and a great amount of the element can be

    recovered from waste. In all Western countries, most fertilizers are now applied to feed not food

    crops, and hence moderating the current high rates of meat consumption (commonly in excess of

    100 kg per capita) would reduce the amount of needed fertilizer. Such cuts would also have

    environmental and health benefits.

    An even more important option especially given the facts that much of modern meat, milk, and

    egg production is done in a concentrated manner, and that half of the worlds population lives in

    cities is now available thanks to advances in phosphorus reuse from manures and municipal

    wastes. Grantham could have talked to many experts in this flourishing field, or could have simplyconsulted the SCOPE Newsletter, which reports, several times every year, the latest scientific and

    commercial achievements regarding phosphorus recovery. In the latest issue of this newsletter he

    would have also learned that the world has, at the current rate of consumption, about 600 years of

    minable potassium reserves.

    Grantham cannot dismiss all of this as just usual propaganda put out by the fertilizer industry. That

    a financier and asset manager whose expertise does not include resource geology, soil science,

    plant science, or agronomy comes to only one conclusion, namely that the use of fertilizers

    must be drastically reduced in the next 2040 years or we will begin to starve, is as wrong as it is

    understandable. Clearly, he was after sensational headlines and, indeed, in his column he implores

    scientists to engage in overstatement and to be arrested (if necessary) in order to call attention tothe imminent perils he describes. That the worlds leading scientific journal prints such tabloid talk

    is harder to comprehend. Do we not have science precisely in order to provide us with the best

    available evidence so we can understand the real challenges and make well-informed decisions to

    pursue the most responsible and the most effective solutions?

    Vaclav Smil does interdisciplinary research in the fields of energy, environmental and

    population change, food production and nutrition, technical innovation, risk assessment,

    and public policy.

    my Grantham, Starving for Facts The American Magazine http://www.american.com/archive/2012/december/jeremy-granth

    12/9/2012

  • 8/13/2019 Jeremy-Grantham-Starving-for-Facts--The-American-Magazine Dec12

    3/3

    FURTHER READING: Smil also writes Far from Electrify ing, A Son of Europe Reflects on the EUs Nobel

    Prize, and Antic ipating the Worlds Most Expensive Natural Disaster. Blake Hurst discusses Organic

    Illusions. Kenneth P. Green says Energy Is Everywhere. Nick Schulz contributes Jeremy Grantham:

    Contrarian, Up to a Point.

    Image by Darren Wamboldt / Bergman Group

    my Grantham, Starving for Facts The American Magazine http://www.american.com/archive/2012/december/jeremy-granth

    12/9/2012