Jauss, Hans Robert_Horizon Structure and Dialogicity
19
/ 196 D ROUSSEA U' S NOUVELLE HELOisE AND G OE TH E' S WERTHER J ag er , G eo rg ( GJ ), E mp fi nd sa mk ei t u nd R an um (St uttgart, 1969). La una y, M ic he l ( ML ) , R ou ss ea u et son temps (Paris, 1969). L ep en ie s, W. (WL) , Melancholie und Ges ellschaft (Fr ank fur t, 1972). M aa g , G. (GM 1 98 1) , " Da s A st he ti sc he al s echte und als scheinbare N eg at iv it at b ei R ou ss ea u, " in Romani sti sch e Zeitsc hri ft for Lit eraturgeschichte, 4 ( 19 81 ), pp, 415- 42. M at te nk lo t t, Ge rt (GM) , " Br ie fr or nan," in Deu tsche Litera tur : Ein e Soc ial geschichie , vol. 4, ed. H. Gl as e r ( Ha mb ur g, 1 98 0) , p p. 1 85 -2 03 M au re r, Karl (KM) , " Di e ver sc hl ei er te n K on fe ss io ne n, " in Fes tsc hrift for Fri edrich Maurer (Stutt- g ar t, 1 96 3) , pp. 424-37. M ey er -K a lku s, Re i nh ar d (RM) , "We rt he rs Kr a nk hei t z um T od e, " i n Urszenen, ed . A.Kittler and H Turk (Fra nkfurt , 1977), pp. 7 6- 13 8. Mog, Paul (PM 19 76), Ratio und Gef uhlskultur (Ti ibi nge n, 197 6). Morne t, D an ie l ( OM ), La Nou vel le Heloise (Pa ri s, 1925). M ou ni er , Ja c qu es ( JM ), La fort une des ecrit de 1.-1. Rousse au dans i es pays de langue al l em an de de 1782, a 1813 (Paris , 1980). M ul le r , P et er ( PM ), Der jung e Goethe im zeilgenosseschefl Urteil (Be rli n, (96 9). O et t ing er , Kl aus (KO ), " Ei ne K ra nk he it zum Tode : Zum Skand al ur n We rt h er s S el bst m or d, " in Del' Deutschunterricht, 28 (19 76) , p, 63. R ot hm an n, Ku rt (KR) , Erl auterungen lin d Dok umente ( zu G oe th es "Wer the r" ) ( St ut tg ar t, 1 97 4) . S au de r , G er ha rd (GS 1 97 4) , Empfindsamkeit, vol. 1 (Stutt gar t, 1974). -- , ( GS ), "S ubj ek tiv it at u nd E mp fi nds nmk ci t i m Ro ma n," in Sturm u nd Dra ng ; e d. W. Hinck (Kronberg, J 9 78 ), p p. 1 63 -7 4. Sch laffer, Han nel ore (HS ), Nac hwo rt zu Goe the .' Wil hel m Mei sters Lehrja hre (St utt gart, 197 9), pp. 641~66. - ,(HS 1980), Wilhelm M ei s te r: Das Ende der Kunst und die Wi ede rk ehr des My /hos (Stuttgart, 1980). S ch la f fe r , Heinz (HS, 1 97 3) , Der Burger als Held (Fr ank fur t, 1973). S ch mi dt , Er i ch (ES ), Ri char d so n, Rou ss ea u und G oe th e (Je na, 1942). S ch off l er , H er be rt (HS) , "Die Leiden d es j un ge n W er th er ," in Deutscher Geist lm .18. Jahrundert (Got t in ge n, 1 96 7) , p p. 1 15 -8 4. Spa emann, Robert (RS), "Ge net isc hes zum Naturb egr ilf des 18. Jahrhunderts," in Archi v for Begri ffs- geschichte, I I (1967) , p p. 5 9- 74 . St ack el be r g, J ti r gen v. (J S 1980), "Das Bi ld der Fr au im fr a nz os is ch en R om an des 1 8 J a hr hu nd er ts ," n St udi en zum. acht zehten Jahrhunder ts, vol. 2/2, ed. B. Fabiari et a1. (Munich, 1 98 0) . S ta ro bi ns ki , Je a n ( JS ), J.- l. Rousse au. La tr ans pa re nce et Iob st ac le (Paris, 1971). S ti er I e, Karl he i nz ( KS ), " Th eo ri e u nd E rf ah ru ug , Da s Werk J. ,J. Rou ss e aus und di e D ia le kt ik de l Aufklarun g," in Europ aisc he Aufkl arung , ed. J. v. St acke lbe rg ( Wi es ba de n, 1980). T ay lo r, Sa muel S.B. (ST), "R us seau's Contemportary Reputa tio n in France ," in Studies on Voltai re, 27 (1963), p p. 154 5- 74 . To nz , L eo ( LT ), "Von der 'asiles' der Nou vel le Hel ois e zu dem 'Lieblingspllitzschen' Werthers," in Ge rma nisch-romani sch Monats sch rift , 2 0 ( 19 70 ) , pp. 412- 25. Werther," Germaniques S ( 19 50 ), pp. 120- 33. V os s ka mp, W il he lm ( WV ) , " Di a log is ch e V er ge ge nw or ti gu ng be im S ch r ei b en u nd L es en , Zur Poe ti k des Br le f ro ma ns i ml 8. J ah rh un der t s, " in Deutsche Viert elja hresschrift, 45 (19 71), pp. 80-U6. W eb e r, H ei nz- Di et er (HDW), " St e ll a oder die Ne gat iv ir at des Happy End, " ii n Rezeptionsgeschichte oder Wirkungsasthetik ( St utt g ar t, 1 97 8) , p p. 1 42 -6 7. W in te r , Ha ns - Ge rh ar d ( HW ), " Ge se ll sc ha f und Kult ur . .. " and "Ant ik l as si z is m us : S tu rm u nd D ra ng , " in Ge sc h ic hle der deut sc h en Li t er at ur v or n 18. Jah rhu nde rt his WI' Gegenwart, ed. V Z me gac ( Ko ni gs t ei n, 1 97 9) , p p. 1 75 -2 56 . , E. Horizon Structure and Dialogicity T he r ev iv al o f l it er ar y h er me ne ut ic s t ha t b eg an i n t h e 1 96 0s h as m ov ed a p ar ti cu - airconcept tothe or efront of methodological reflection, a con cep t that the histor - ical and philological discip lin es have always taken for gra nted when inter pre ting texts, but which they have seldom dealt with in terms of its specifics, and not at all in terms of ~ethod. The concept in question is that of the horizon insofar as i t- as h is to ri ca l m ar ke r a nd , a t t h e s am e t i me , t he nec es sa ry c on di ti on f or t he p os - s ib il it y o f experi e nt ia l k no wled ge -c on st it ut es all st ruct ur e s o f m ea ni ng r el at ed t o h um an a ct io n a nd p ri ma ry m od es o f c omp re he nd in g t he w or ld . Th e e ff or t e xp en de d i n c omp re he nd in g t he h is to ri ca l d is ta nc e b et we en t he alien horizon of the text and the horizon of the interpreter did not appear p ro bl em at ic as long as the notion of the mind generated b y Ge rma n i de al is m o r the later idea l o f e xa ct it ud e g en er at ed b y p os it iv is m g ua ra nt ee d d ir ec t a cc es s t o a n i nt er pr et at io n, O n t he o th er h an d, t he h is to ri ci st m od el r ec og ni ze d t hat the in- t er pr et er wa b ou nd t o a s pe ci fi c s it e a nd , t hu s, m ad e t he q ua li ta ti ve d if fe re nc e between the past and thepresen t a hermeneutic problem. It allowed one to believe t he p ro bl em o f c omp re he nd in g a n a li en h or iz on had been solved if one's own h or iz on - t he int er pre t er 's inter es ts o r b ia se s - w er e b ra ck et ed . This cut the w or k o f h is to ri ca l u nd er st an di ng in half so to speak, limiting it to the disinterested r ec on st ru ct io n o f p as t l if e w it hi n t he h or iz on o f i ts h i st o ri ca l d if fe re nt ne ss . A r e- newed cr iti que of hi st oricism, pioneered by Hans-Georg Gadamer in particular, has fully exp osed the- nodoubt quite fr uitful= objectivist ill usion underlying this sor t of one- sided hermene utics. It h as a ls o d em on st ra te d t ha t a p ri or e ve nt c an no t b e u nd er st oo d w it ho ut lo ok in g a t i ts c on se qu en ce s, nor a work o f a rt w it ho ut in- 197
Jauss, Hans Robert_Horizon Structure and Dialogicity
![Jauss, Hans Robert. [1972] Pequeña apología de la ... · PDF file1 Jauss, Hans Robert. [1972] Pequeña apología de la experiencia estética . Barcelona, Paidós, 2002. I Quien se](https://img.dokumen.tips/doc/110x75/5a9e5dc97f8b9a7f2e8bf66a/jauss-hans-robert-1972-pequea-apologa-de-la-jauss-hans-robert-1972-pequea.jpg)
