Jamie Woodcock: The Working Class in Britain Today

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 Jamie Woodcock: The Working Class in Britain Today

    1/6

  • 7/28/2019 Jamie Woodcock: The Working Class in Britain Today

    2/6

  • 7/28/2019 Jamie Woodcock: The Working Class in Britain Today

    3/6

    Oxford Left Review 7

    have changed as much. Secondly, the categories themselves are far from homogenous. For example

    the Skilled Trades Occupation category could include a variety of different class positions, covering

    foremen, the manual self-employed, and small businessmen. This is important because it embraces

    -

    ers, however skilled, who depend on the sale of their labour-power for their livelihood (Callinicos,

    Service Occupations, there are various layers of supervisors which control and supervise the labour

    of other workers. This means that there can be workers to use Wrights (1978: 63) terminology

    occupying objectively contradictory locations within class relations. Although they sell their own

    labour they form part of the role of capital, and therefore, they have two opposing class interests.

    The growth of service work is a central trend. What would it mean if a worker is now more likely to

    work in a supermarket or a call centre, rather than in a factory or a coal mine? This kind of employ-

    ment can indeed be subjected to similar methods of control and supervision originally developed in

    the factory. The technology used to control the labour process in call centres is perhaps analogous

    according to Taylorian principles. The application of Taylorianism outside the Fordist factory was

    anticipated by Braverman (1999: p79), when he argued that mental labour, after being separated from

    manual labour, is then itself subdivided rigorously according to the same rule. The purpose of this

    is to cheapen the worker by decreasing his training and enlarging his output (Braverman, 1999: p81).

    Impact of neoliberalism

    The statistics from 1987 and 2012 capture a period marked by the rise of neoliberalism. Its ad-

    -

    es (Harvey, 2007: p12). These structural changes have been forced through with a series of de-

    governments austerity agenda. It has exposed increasing layers of society, without organisations

    or traditions of trade union membership, to the experience of precarious working conditions.

    This can be seen in the statistics for trade union membership, providing an estimate of the current

    institutional level of working class organisation. Like census statistics, however, such statistics ob-

    scure certain dynamics within working class organisation. The headline statistics for 2011 show that

    series, begun in 1995. The membership is divided between 3.9 million in the public sector and 2.5

    million in the private sector (Brownlie, 2012: p7). Union membership density in the public sector

    is exacerbated by the fact that the education and health and social work industries each account for

    -

    tively (Brownlie, 2012: p11). It is therefore possible to say that these areas have a hugely dispropor-

    The phenomenon of workplaces without organisation and precarious conditions has been

    the focus of recent debates about work. At one extreme Guy Standing (2011) argues for the

    emergence of a new class, the precariat, providing little empirical evidence in support of his

  • 7/28/2019 Jamie Woodcock: The Working Class in Britain Today

    4/6

  • 7/28/2019 Jamie Woodcock: The Working Class in Britain Today

    5/6

    Oxford Left Review 9

    We hope to meet in this work with the support of all workers in town and coun-

    try who understand that they alone can describe with full knowledge the mis-

    fortunes from which they suffer, and that only they, and not saviours sent by Providence,

    can energetically apply the healing remedies for the social ills to which they are a prey.

    -

    sus or a sociological study. It explicitly links the construction of knowledge to a politi-cal project. It takes as its starting point that those interested in conducting such surveys:

    Must wish for an exact and positive knowledge of the conditions in which the work-

    ing class the class to whom the future belongs works and moves. (Marx, 1938: p379)

    The postal survey aimed to collect information, but crucially, it also intended to make contact

    -duction are, in a sense, part of trade union organisation. What is novel about this outline of a

    -

    sults that were gained from the survey, nor is there a discussion of either its successes or failures.

    -

    skyist movement, concerning the analysis of Stalinist Russia as a degenerated workers state. Of

    particular interest are the Johnson-Forest Tendency in the USA (Dunayevskaya, 1972), the Social-

    isme ou Barbarie group in France (Kessler, 1978), and the International Socialists in Britain, which

    did not solidify into a group until later (Kuper, 1971). One particularly interesting example is the

    study produced by the Johnson-Forest Tendency called The American Worker. It is a two part

    working class. This builds on the arguments put forward by Lukcs (1971: p21), according to

    whom the Marxist method, the dialectical materialist knowledge of reality, can arise only from

    the point of view of a class, from the point of view of the struggle of the proletariat. This

    -

    development of capitalism, but the development of the revolution. This new method of re-

    Political militants have always done conricerca. We would go in front of the factory and

    Alquati taught us that the problem is to grasp the truth, not to describe it. For the capacity to anticipate a tendency

  • 7/28/2019 Jamie Woodcock: The Working Class in Britain Today

    6/6