J Pradeep Chaitanya - Urban Corridor Management for Heterogenous Traffic Conditions [Compatibility Mode]

8/4/2019 J Pradeep Chaitanya - Urban Corridor Management for Heterogenous Traffic Conditions [Compatibility Mode]

1/47

URBAN CORRIDOR MANAGEMENT FOR

HETEROGENOUS TRAFFIC CONDITIONS A CASE

STUDY OF AMEERPET TO KUKATPALLY

CORRIDOR, HYDERABAD

Page 1

J Pradeep ChytanyaAsst. Engineer (Highway Designs)Egis India Consulting Engineers Pvt. Ltd.


2/47

INTRODUCTION

CORRIDORCORRIDORCORRIDORCORRIDOR:

MANAGEMENTMANAGEMENTMANAGEMENTMANAGEMENT:.CORRIDOR PROBLEMS:CORRIDOR PROBLEMS:CORRIDOR PROBLEMS:CORRIDOR PROBLEMS: PHV, VOR, ACCESS &PHV, VOR, ACCESS &PHV, VOR, ACCESS &PHV, VOR, ACCESS &CONVINIENCE, CURRENT TRENDS, SAFETY, PEAK HOURCONVINIENCE, CURRENT TRENDS, SAFETY, PEAK HOURCONVINIENCE, CURRENT TRENDS, SAFETY, PEAK HOURCONVINIENCE, CURRENT TRENDS, SAFETY, PEAK HOUR

Page 2

: ,,,,FUNDING & NEED, A CMP IS A GOOD BACK BONE FOR CTTPFUNDING & NEED, A CMP IS A GOOD BACK BONE FOR CTTPFUNDING & NEED, A CMP IS A GOOD BACK BONE FOR CTTPFUNDING & NEED, A CMP IS A GOOD BACK BONE FOR CTTPOBJECTIVES:OBJECTIVES:OBJECTIVES:OBJECTIVES: IDENTIFY, UNDERSTAND, EVALUATE MANAGEIDENTIFY, UNDERSTAND, EVALUATE MANAGEIDENTIFY, UNDERSTAND, EVALUATE MANAGEIDENTIFY, UNDERSTAND, EVALUATE MANAGE


3/47

LITERATURE REVIEW

HAND BOOKS OF VARIOUS DOTS HAS BEENREFERRED

AMERIACN, EUROPEAN AND AUSTRALIAN

Page 3

REVIEWED & BEST METHODOLOGY FOR INDIANCONDITIONS WAS DRAWN


4/47

GETTING ORGANIZED

KNOW THE CORRIDOR

DEVELOP THE CHOICES

SELECT PREFFEREDIMPLEMENTATION

SUSTAIN THE VISION

US DOT METHODOLOGY EUROPEAN METHODOLOGY

IDENTIFY CORRIDOR

CONVEY TO PUBLIC

REVIEW OF OPTIONS

DRAFT CMPPUBLIC REVIEW &COMENTS

FINAL CMP

Page 4

GETTING ORGANIZED

EXISTING & FUTURE CONDITIONS

DEVELOP VISION & STRATEGIESDEVELOP IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

DRAFT CMP & PUBLIC ISSUE

MONITOR PROGRESS


5/47

CURRENT STUDY METHODOLOGY

Page 5


6/47

STUDY AREA = HYDERABADSTUDY AREA DESCRIPTION : Hyderabad, the capital of Andhra

Pradesh has emerged as most preferred destination for innovativetechnologies. The main growth driver in Real Estate Market is IT, ITESand BPO industries. Hyderabad, during the last 7- 8 years.

ABOUT STUDY AREA

Page 6

= -MAIN ARTERIAL


7/47

Page 7


8/47

AMEERPET - MYTHRIVANAM

Page 8


9/47

MYTHRIVANAM SR NAGAR

Page 9


10/47

SR NAGAR - ESI

Page 10


11/47

ESI - ERRAGADDA

Page 11


12/47

ERRAGADDA - KUKATPALLY

Page 12


13/47

DATA COLLECTION

INTERSECTIONS = 6

SEGMENTS = 5

CORRIDOR LENGTH = 6.1 Km

SEGMENT LENGTHS

Page 13


14/47

PHYSICAL INVENTORY

Page 14


15/47

Page 15


16/47

TRAFFIC VOLUMES OF SEGMENTS

SEGMENT PEAK HOUR

VOLUME(PCUS/HR)

PEAK HOUR

Ameerpet Jn toMythrivanam

5075 11:30 am - 12:30 noon

Page 16

Mythrivanam to SR Nagar 4853 11:00 am - 12:00 noon

SR Nagar to ESI 5292 6:00 pm 7:00 pm

ESI to Erragadda 4844 4:45 pm 5:45 pm

Erragadda to Kukatpally Y

Jn.

4602 9:30 am 10:30 am


17/47

TRAFFIC VOLUMES OF INTERSECTIONS

INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR

VOLUME (PCUS/HR)

PEAK HOUR

SRINAGAR 13105 6:45 PM to 7:45 PM

MYTHRIVANAM 6712 10:15 AM to 11:15AM

Page 17

SR NAGAR 16181 10:00 AM to 11:00 AMESI 12740 10:45 AM to 11:45 AM

ERRAGADDA 8848 7:00 PM to 8:00 PM

KUKATPALLY Y Jn 6721 7:00 PM to 8:00 PM


18/47

PEAK HOUR VARIATIONS

13105

16182

12741

PEAK HOUR VARIATIONS IN THE CORRIDOR

PEAK HOUR VOLUMES (PCU'S/Hr)

Page 18

5076

6713

4853 5292 4845

8848

4602

6721

Srinagar Jn. Ameerpet -Mythrivanam

MythrivanamJn.

Mythrivanam- SRNagar

SR Nagar Jn. SR Nagar -ESI

ESI Jn ESI -Erradadda

ErragaddaJn.

Erragadda -Kukatpally

Kukatpally"Y" Jn.


19/47

2W58%

AUTO20%

TRUCKS0%

BUS5%

CARS17%

OTHERS0%


2W56%

AUTO

TRUCKS0%

BUS5%

CARS20%

OTHERS0%

MYTHRIVANAM - SR NAGAR

MODAL SHARES ALONG THE CORRIDOR

Page 19

2W60%

AUTOS20%

TRUCKS1%

BUS2%

CARS17%

OTHERS

0%

SR NAGAR - ESI

2W58%AUTO

16%

TRUCKS0%

BUS4%

CARS22%

OTHERS0%

ESI - ERRAGADDA


20/47

2W59%

AUTOS17%

TRUCKS1%

BUS3%

CARS19%

OTHERS1%


2W52%

AUTO21%

TRUCKS0%

BUS3%

CAR24%

OTHERS0%

SRINAGAR JN

Page 20

2W53%

AUTOS19%

TRUCKS1%

BUS4%

CARS23%

OTHERS0%

MYTHRIVANAM JN

2W48%

AUTOS22%

TRUCKS1%

BUS2%

CARS26%

OTHERS1%

SR NAGAR JN


21/47

2W57%

AUTOS21%

TRUCKS0%

BUS2%

CARS20%

OTHERS0%

ESI Jn

2W45%

AUTOS26%

TRUCKS1%

BUS4%

CARS24%

OTHERS0%

ERRAGADDA Jn

KUKATPALLY "Y" Jn

Page 21

2W

50%

AUTOS19%

TRUCKS2%

BUS7%

CARS22%

OTHERS0%


22/47

SIGNAL TIMINGS ALONG THE CORRIDOR

Page 22


23/47

CAPACITY OF MID BLOCKS

CAPACITY & LOS OF MID BLOCKS

MORTAB AND CHARI 1991 = 4 LANE DIVIDED

For LOS C & for 10% SMV the DSVS are as follows

MODEMODEMODEMODE DSVSDSVSDSVSDSVS

Page 23

Capacity of Single Lane = Capacity * (100/(100 - % of SMV))..(1)

Capacity of whole Segment = Capacity of single lane * 2..(2)

CARS2075BUS 1820

TRUCKS 1445

AUTOS 1935

2WHEELERS 3300


24/47

SPEED FLOW CURVES = 6 LANE DIVIDED

DELAY & LOS OF INTERSECTIONSBASED ON HCM 200

Controlled Delay = Stopped Delay +Acc/Dcc Delay3= *

Page 24

...

FVS = Fraction of vehicles stopping = Vstop / Vtot ....5

Free-Flow

Speed

7 vehicles 8-19

vehicles

20-30

vehicles 60km/h +5 +2 +1

>60-71 km/h +7 +4 +2

>71 km/h +9 7 +5


25/47

DELAYS & LOS OF INTERSECTIONS

INTERSECTION STOPED DELAY

(Sec/Veh)

Acc/Dcc Delay

(Sec/Veh)

LOS

SRINAGAR 16.4 1.9 B

MYTHRIVANAM 37.9 1.5 D

Page 25

SR NAGAR 65.2 1.8 E

ESI 24.1 1.3 C

ERRAGADDA 23.4 1.5 C

KUKATPALLY Y

Jn

49.6 1.3 D


26/47

CAPACITY & LOS OF SEGMENTS

SEGMENT NAME CAPACITY

(vph)

V/C

RATIO

LOS

Ameerpet Jn to Mythrivanam 4200 0.766 C

Page 26

Mythrivanam to SR Nagar 4465 0.835 D

SR Nagar to ESI 6246 0.763 C

ESI to Erragadda 4560 0.827 D

Erragadda to Kukatpally Y Jn. 5688 0.756 C


27/47

FLOATING CAR SURVEYS

2 TRAILS IN PEAK & OFF PEAK

TO & FRO PEAK = 10:00 AM 11:00 AM

=

Page 27


28/47

AMEERPET TO KUKATPALLY

ELEMENT PEAK OFF PEAK

Avg. Journey Time (Min)

13.08 8.15

12.35 7.76

Page 28

Avg. Running Time (Min)

Avg. Journey Speed (Kmph)

27.15 44.73

Avg. Running speed (Kmph)

29.07 47.67

Avg. Delay (Sec)

44 23


29/47

KUKATPALLY TO AMEERPET

ELEMENT PEAK OFF PEAK

Avg. Journey Time (Min)

15.33 9.76

Page 29

Avg. Running Time (Min)

. .

Avg. Journey Speed (Kmph)

24.96 41.53

Avg. Running speed (Kmph)

26.32 44.19

Avg. Delay (Sec)

59 20


30/47

BOTTLENECK ANALYSIS

DATA COLLECTED FLOATING CAR SURVEYS

TIME/100m

PLOTTED USINGMINITAB 15 &D PLOT

Page 30

X AXIS = TIME

Y AXIS = DISTANCE

Z AXIS = SPEED

RESULTS COMPARED


31/47

WORKING WITH MINITAB 15

Page 31


32/47

WORKING WITH D-PLOT

Page 32


33/47

COMPARISION OF BOTTLENECKS

Page 33


34/47

OBSERVATIONS

Page 34


35/47

SPEED PROFILES

RECORDED DURING FLOATING CAR SURVEYS

SPEEDS COMPARED B/W PEAK AND OFF PEAK TIMES

Page 35


36/47

50

60

70

80

90

100

ED(Kmph)

AMEERPET - KUKATPALLY

OFF - PEAK

PEAK

Page 36

0

10

20

30

40SPE

DISTANCE (m)


37/47

CAUSALITY ANALYSIS

CARRIED OUT DURING SURVEYS

PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED MANAGEMENT MEASURES SUGGESTED

Page 37


38/47


LOCATION PROBLEM IDENTIFIED MANAGEMENT MEASURES

AMEERPET BUS STOP SLOW TRAFFIC MOVEMENT

DUE TO BUS STOP BUS STOP

RELOCATION OF BUS STOP

MYTHRIVANAM JN. PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SEPARATE PHASE FOR

Page 38

INSTALL BULLBOUTS

MYTHRIVANAM JN. MINOR LEG EXPERIENCING

MORE DELAY

GREEN TIME HAS TO BE

ALTERED


39/47

MYTHRIVANAM SR NAGAR


MYTHRIVANAM BUS STOP HIGH SPEEDS OF THE

VEHICLES, PEDESTRAIN

CROSSING

INSTALL SPEED BREAKERS

OR CUSHIONS OR A SPEED

HUMP

Page 39

FOOT OVER BRIDGE

SR NAGAR JN. SIGNAL JUMPING AT

AMEERPET TO KUKATPALLY

LEG

TYRE FLATTENING,

SR NAGAR JN. DELAY AND QUEUE LENGTH

ARE GETTING INCREASED

FOR THE MINOR LEG

CLOSE THE DIVIDER WHICH

IS JUST 28M OF LENGTH


40/47

SR NAGAR - ESI


ESI BUS STOP SLOWING DOWN OF SPEEDS

BECAUSE IT WAS LOCATED

MUST BE RELOCATED AFTER

300M

Page 40

VERY NEXT TO THENARROWED ROAD AT

DARGA.

ESI JN. SIGNAL JUMPING FROM THE

TWO WHEELERS.

TYRE FLATTENING.


41/47

ESI - ERRAGADDA


FRUIT MARKET ENCROACHMENTS AND SIDEFRICTION.

ENCROACHMENTS NEED TOBE STRICTLY CLEARED

Page 41

FRUIT MARKET ILLEGAL MEDIAN OPENING, ILLEGAL MEDIAN OPENINGHAS TO BE CLOSED.

ERRAGADDA JN. PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS

CAUSING INTERFERENCE TO

THE THROUGH TRAFFIC.

MEDIAN HAS TO BE RAISED

TO SOME HEIGHT SO THAT

THE CROSSINGS WILL BE

DONE AT THE ESI JN.


42/47



MOOSAPET ENCROACHMENTS AND SIDE

FRICTION.

ENCROACHMENTS NEED TO

BE STRICTLY CLEARED

MOOSAPET BUS STOP ILLEGAL MEDIAN OPENING ILLEGAL MEDIAN OPENING

Page 42

HAS TO BE CLOSED.

KUKATPALLY Y JN. BUSES ARE STOPPING ON THE

PASSENGERS REQUEST AT

THE JUNCTION

BUS STOP HAS TO BE

RELOCATED AT A DISTANCE

OF 250M FROM THE Y JN.

INSTALL A SPEED HUMP JUST

BEFORE THE INTERSECTION

SO AS TO REDUCE THE SPEED

OF THE THROUGH TRAFFIC.


43/47

BULL BOUTS

Page 43


44/47

SPEED HUMPS

Page 44


45/47

CONCLUSIONS

PEAK HOUR VOLUME IS HIGH AT SR NAGAR Jn & SR

NAGAR ESI MID BLOCKDELAY AT SR NAGAR IS HIGH & LESS AT SRINAGAR

Page 45

AMEERPET MYTHRIVANAM HAVE LESS CAPACITY

KUKATPALLY ERRAGADDA HAVE MORE DELAY

ESI SR NAGAR HAVE LESS DELAY 4 BOTTLENECKS IDENTIFIED WITH 2 ON EITHER

SIDE


46/47

OVERALL CORRIDOR PERFORMANCE CAN BE

IMPROVED WHEN, PEDESTRAIN CROSSINGS

Page 46

ENCROACHMENTS CLEARED


47/47

VERY GLAD TO HAVE THIS OPPORTUNITYVERY GLAD TO HAVE THIS OPPORTUNITYVERY GLAD TO HAVE THIS OPPORTUNITYVERY GLAD TO HAVE THIS OPPORTUNITY

THANKING YOU,THANKING YOU,THANKING YOU,THANKING YOU,

Page 47

J Pradeep Chytanya

Documents

J Pradeep Chaitanya - Urban Corridor Management for Heterogenous Traffic Conditions [Compatibility Mode]