20
Frequency Reuse Efficiency and Admission Control in Multirate Systems Wireless Technologies Laboratory (WITEK) Department of Communications School of Electrical and Computer Engineering State University of Campinas - São Paulo - Brazil Álvaro Augusto M. de Medeiros (UNICAMP/SP) Prof. Michel Daoud Yacoub (UNICAMP/SP) César Kyn D’Ávila (CEDET/ SP) ITS 2002, Natal - RN, September 9, 2002

Its2002 presentation

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presentation of the paper "Frequency Reuse Eficiency and Admission Control in Multirate Systems" for the ITS 2002.

Citation preview

Page 1: Its2002 presentation

Frequency Reuse Efficiency and Admission Control in Multirate

Systems

Wireless Technologies Laboratory (WITEK) Department of Communications

School of Electrical and Computer Engineering State University of Campinas - São Paulo - Brazil

Álvaro Augusto M. de Medeiros (UNICAMP/SP) Prof. Michel Daoud Yacoub (UNICAMP/SP)

César Kyn D’Ávila (CEDET/ SP)

ITS 2002, Natal - RN, September 9, 2002

Page 2: Its2002 presentation

Presentation Outline

Introduction Interference on Forward Link Relative Power and Admission Control Frequency Reuse Efficiency on CAC CAC Algorithm and an application

example Conclusion

Page 3: Its2002 presentation

Introduction

Frequency Reuse Efficiency Related to system capacity and coverage 3G Services Forward link limited Multirate services with different QoS requirements

OCk

kk IP

PF+

=

Page 4: Its2002 presentation

Interference on Forward Link

Cell j

rj

ri

ri

αδεjko

jT

kkSC rlPI

)(

)1( −=

∑≠=

=M

jii iko

iT

OC rlPI

1

)(

α

Same cell

Others cells

αα δδεjko

jT

kjko

jT

kkk rlP

rlPP

)()(

)1( +−=

Page 5: Its2002 presentation

Relative Power

Signal-to-interference ratio Relative power

( )SCOC

jkoj

Tk

kkt

b

IIrlP

RW

IE

+

=

αδ )(

kk

kkk

Lχεεδ

++

=

Page 6: Its2002 presentation

Relative Power

Jamming Margin

Lk parameter

α

∑≠=

=

M

jii i

jj

T

iT

k rr

PPL

1)(

)(

tB

kk IE

RW=χ

Depends on network topology, base stations’ transmission powers and propagation environment

Page 7: Its2002 presentation

Relative Power

Relative power

kk

kkk

Lχεεδ

++

=

Depending on the users’ location, a new subscriber may not have access to all services

Higher bit rates demand

a higher fraction of the forward link total power

Page 8: Its2002 presentation

Relative Power

Lk parameter in a four-tier network and PT

(i)/ PT (j)=1

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.00.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

α=4α=3

α=2

L k / L

k max

d/Rcell

α Lk (mean) Lk max

4 0.291 2.073 3 0.549 2.542 2 1.551 4.284

Page 9: Its2002 presentation

Relative Power

Lk parameter in a four-tier network and PT

(i)/ PT (j)=1

α=4

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

Lk/Lk max

Y

X

00.100.250.500.751.0

Page 10: Its2002 presentation

Relative Power and CAC

Lk after user’s admission Relative power after user’s admission

α

∑≠= +

=+

M

jii ik

jk

tj

T

iT

k rr

PP

tL1 1

)(

)(

)()1(

1)()(

1)( )()()( ++ += t

jTkt

jTt

jT PPP δ

( )kkk tLtL δ−⋅=+ 1)()1(⇒

)()(

tLtL

kkk

kkk ++

+=

χεε

δ

Page 11: Its2002 presentation

Fk and CAC

Fk after user’s admission Jamming margin values

kkkkkk

kkkkk tLtL

tLFχχεε

χεε)()(

)(+++

++=

Service Rk (Eb/It)k χk Voice 8 kbps 7 dB 95.77

Video 144 kbps 7 dB 5.32

Packet Data 384 kbps 10 dB 1

Page 12: Its2002 presentation

Fk and CAC

Fk versus χk 4 tiers εk =0.5 α=4

0 20 40 60 80 1000.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0α=4

Lk/Lk max=0,1; 0,2; ... 1,0

Reus

e effi

cienc

y (F k )

Jamming Margin (χk)

Page 13: Its2002 presentation

Fk and CAC

Fk versus χk 4 tiers εk =0.5 α=2

0 20 40 60 80 1000.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0α=2

Lk/Lk max=0,1; 0,2; ... 1,0

Reus

e Effi

cienc

y (F k )

Jamming Margin (χk)

Page 14: Its2002 presentation

CAC using Lk and χk

Load Factor Subscriber’s contribution

∑=

=N

kk

1ρρ

−+=

k

kk

k

kk F

F1εχυρ

++

+=kkkk

kkk

k

kk L

Lχεε

χεχυρ

Page 15: Its2002 presentation

CAC using Lk and χk

ρk versus Lk / Lk max 4 tiers εk =0.5 α=4

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

υk= 0.2 →1

υk= 0.2 →1

υk= 0.2, 0.5, 1

ρ k

Lk / Lk max

384 kbps 144 kbps 8 kbps

Page 16: Its2002 presentation

Application example

Urban scenario (α=4), εk =0.5, ρmax=0.5, 4 tiers In this scenario, a packet data user has a

load factor contribution ρk=0.5 for Lk near zero. He must be confined within a maximum

distance dmax ≤ 0.3rcell

Page 17: Its2002 presentation

Application example

Before admission: Possible scenario after admission:

dmax/Rcell 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.9 Existing voice users 10 10 10 5 5

Possible combinations of new video users dmax/Rcell

S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 0.2 - 1 1 - 3 0.4 - - 1 3 - 0.6 - - 1 - - 0.8 - 1 - - - 0.9 1 - - - -

Total users 1 2 3 3 3

Page 18: Its2002 presentation

Conclusions

Frequency Reuse Efficiency must be calculated locally For higher bit rates or higher demands of

Eb/It , the required Fk has a considerable variation Fk is strongly dependent on the network

topology Which services and where within the cell they are

guaranteed

Page 19: Its2002 presentation

Conclusions

An admission control algorithm must consider the value of the reuse efficiency according to subscriber’s location and requested service. A CAC algorithm was proposed based on the

capacity equation. Finally, we presented an example of

admission control for WCDMA services using this algorithm.

Page 20: Its2002 presentation

Questions and Comments

Contact: [email protected]

WITEK – DECOM/FEEC/UNICAMP

Campinas - São Paulo - Brasil