Items for Discussion for Joint Meeting between WG4 and WG2

16/Nov/2009

WG4: LCY-039

2

Items for Discussion

1. Project Title of SQL/MM Part 8– Metadata Registry (MDR)

• Recognized conflict between WG 2 and WG 4

– Metadata Query Language (MQL)• Rejected in the Jeju Plenary, June 2009

– Registry Query Component (RQC)– Registry Access Component (RAC)– MDR Access – Metadata Registry Access (MRA)– Reg. Access

3

Items for Discussion (cont.)

2. What should be the target registry (11179-3 Ed.2 and Ed.3)

4

Items for Discussion (cont.)

2. Target Registry (11179 Ed.2 and Ed.3)– Korea Suggestion : We need to maintain the

current scope of SQL/MM-8 and keep develop-ing its 1st edition. Then, after ISO/IEC 11179-3 3rd edition is standardized, we’d better revise the 1st edition of SQL/MM-8. The reasons we made such decision are follows:

• ISO/IEC 11179-3 3rd edition is under development• SQL/MM-8 can be easily revised to cover the 3rd

edition of ISO/IEC 11179-3• The others such as the parts of ISO/IEC 20944 are

based on ISO/IEC 11179-3 (ed. 2)

5

Items for Discussion (cont.)

3. Does WG2 have a list of incompati-bilities between 11179-3 Ed.2 and Ed.3?

6

Items for Discussion (cont.)

4. Scope of SQL/MM Part 8 (Common part + Specialization?) – e.g., 11179-3(MDR), 19763 all

Parts(MFI), 19773(MDR modules)

7

Items for Discussion (cont.)

5. Business Scenarios for Querying of Registries– WG 2 progress report?– Standardized data requirement for busi-

ness scenarios?

8

Items for Discussion (cont.)

6. To what extent should Part 8 recog-nize the conformance levels defined by 11179-3?

9

Items for Discussion (cont.)

7. Should the Part 8 project be pro-gressed by regular WG4/2 joint meet-ing or formation of collaborative group?