Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Item 1: Agenda Review
! 13th Annual BOG Review Panel Meeting!! Quick round of updates! Clean Lakes final report! Sampling plan for the Bight! Review of 2016 results! Update on 2017 sampling! Timeline for 2018! Make sure we hear from the Panel
• Format for each item: Presentation, Panel, general discussion
! Three-year contracts in place
! WPCL out of the contract analytical chemistry business! 2015 Bass Lakes data report – not completed yet! Statewide Mercury Water Quality Objectives - adopted in May! Mercury Control Program for Reservoirs - draft staff report out for
peer review
! OEHHA advisories - new advisories! Datasets recently added to CEDEN: SRWP 2004, RMP San Leandro
Bay 2016! Delta RMP mercury monitoring continues: 7 fish sites! USGS Webinar Series on mercury in reservoirs – begins 2/14 at
10AM
! Desired outcome: Obtain input on the study from the Review Panel and stakeholders via a group discussion. Input will guide preparation of the final report and fact sheet.
! Written corrections are requested by February 20.
What’s New1. The words “Clean” and “Cleanest” have been
stricken from the record2. Combined the data for statewide survey and
Region 7 in key figures3. Revised “Why?” analysis
• Split out water data by stratum• Additional data gathering and evaluation• Revised linear mixed-effects models• Referenced the Reservoir TMDL staff report analysis
4. Completed incomplete items5. Extensive edits
Purpose of the Technical Report
! Document and allow peer review of the technical foundation for the study and other for other communication products• The Portal• Fact sheet(s)• Press release
Management Value
! Informing the Reservoir TMDL! Informing fish consumers ! Use in Integrated Report?
Figure 1. Locations sampled.
Figure 5a. Spatial pattern in mercury concentrations in largemouth bass - statewide survey and Region 7 Study. Thresholds based on ATLs for women over 45 and men. Colors based on length-adjusted (350 mm) mean concentrations. River locations indicated by diamonds.
Figure 5b. Spatial pattern in mercury concentrations in largemouth bass - statewide survey and Region 7 Study. Thresholds based on ATLs for women 18-45 and children 1-17. Colors based on length-adjusted (350 mm) mean concentrations. River locations indicated by diamonds.
MQ1: Which popular lakes in California can be confirmed to have relatively low concentrations of contaminants in sport fish? ! Women over 45 and Men
• 7 lakes meet all criteria• 8 more could meet all criteria with one more round of
sampling
! Women 18-45 and Children 1-17• 1 lake met all criteria• 5 more could with one more round of sampling
! Mercury• Many lakes confirmed to be at the clean end of the
distribution
Sampling Design – 23 Lakes
Sample Type Number of Samples per Lake
Parameters
Largemouth Bass 10 individuals (size standardized to 350 mm)
Hg
Prey Fish 2-4 composites of ~10 individuals each
Hg, Se
Water Samples 2 samples (subsurface & near-bottom) at 3 locations in each lake (“Bank” or “Open Water”)
THg, MeHg, DOC, SO4, Chla
Sediment Samples 1 sample at 3 locations, corresponding with Water Samples
THg
Lake Properties NA Dam Height, Surface Area, Perimeter, Elevation, Lake Shape Index
Lakes with Length-adjusted Largemouth Bass • 157 lakes sampled to date
• 11 of 16 lakes in lowest 10th percentile from Clean Lakes and Region 7 Studies (Clean Lakes in blue, Region 7 in pink)
• Distribution very similar to the distribution in USEPA’s national lakes survey
Largemouth Bass • 19 lakes
• Lakewide means
• Range 0.02 – 0.28 ppm
Figure16. Mean350mmlargemouthbassmercuryforeachlake,orderedfromhightolowconcentration,alongwithorderedbarplotsforotherparameters.Barsindicatearithmeticmeans,errorbarsrepresentonestandarderror.
Hg in Largemouth Bass
Hg in Prey Fish
Se in Prey Fish
THg in Sediment
THg in Water Chl(a) in Water DOC in Water Sulfate in Water
Dam Height
MeHg in Water
ConductivityLake Shape Bottom DO
MeHg in Water: Open, Surface
MeHg in Water: Open, Bottom
MeHg in Water: Bank, Surface
Table4a. Arithmeticmeanvaluesforconcentrationsinfish,sediment,andwater;andlakepropertiesforallofthelakesinthestatewidesurvey.Bassdataaremeansfor12individuals.Preyfishdataaremeansacrosstwoormorespecies.*-AverageofuncensoredvaluesbelowMDLs.**-AverageincludingbothdetectedvaluesanduncensoredvaluesbelowMDLs.
Fish
Largemouth
Bass (350
mm std
size)
Mercury
(ug/g ww)
Prey Fish
Mercury
(ug/g ww)
Prey Fish
Selenium
(ug/g dw)
Dam
Height (ft)
Lake
Surface
Area
(acres)
Lake
Perimeter
(km)
Lake
Elevation
(ft)
Lake
Shape
Index
Lake-wide
Average
Total
Mercury
(mg/kg
dw)
Total
Mercury,
Bank
(mg/kg
dw)
Total
Mercury,
Open
Water
(mg/kg
dw)
Lake Merced 0.28 0.022 0.31 219 5.7 22 1.5 0.16 0.01 0.24
Lake Gregory 0.25 0.029 0.78 90 82 4.0 4551 1.7 0.10 0.08 0.11
Lake Jennings 0.25 0.059 4.56 200 131 6.6 697 2.3 0.03 0.02 0.04
Legg Lake 0.18 0.012 1.60 27 2.5 199 1.9 0.10 0.07 0.11
Castaic Lagoon 0.15 0.024 1.95 190 5.1 1174 1.4 0.04 0.03 0.04
Bass Lake 0.13 0.029 0.84 145 1002 23.8 3368 3.0 0.03 0.01 0.07
Lopez Lake 0.12 0.018 3.80 166 934 37.9 478 4.9 0.09 0.09 0.09
Palmdale Lake 0.11 0.007 1.12 30 230 6.0 2818 0.4 0.06 0.06 0.06
Antelope Lake 0.11 0.016 0.37 113 949 31.7 5005 4.1 0.05 0.05 0.05
Malibou Lake 0.09 0.023 2.68 44 38 4.7 724 0.7 0.09 0.11 0.07
Lake of the Pines 0.09 0.023 0.55 68 219 9.0 1511 2.4 0.18 0.14 0.19
Loch Lomond Reservoir 0.07 0.020 2.82 182 171 10.3 572 1.7
Sunbeam Lake 0.07 0.022 6.55 31 4.8 -34 3.3 0.01 0.01 0.01
Senator Wash Reservoir 0.07 0.025 12.98 84 383 13.9 210 2.8 0.02 0.01 0.03
Dixon Lake 0.06 0.016 4.30 116 61 3.4 1035 1.7 0.04 0.03 0.05
Lake Evans 0.05 0.009 1.56 12 28 1.4 783 1.1 0.07 0.06 0.07
Lincoln Park Lake 0.05 0.017 1.45 5 0.6 350 1.1 0.15 0.16 0.14
Lake Henshaw 0.03 0.005 1.39 123 1662 16.6 2689 1.6 0.01 0.01 0.01
Prado Lake 0.02 0.003 0.51 59 4.3 536 0.7 0.02 0.01 0.05
Caples Lake 0.107 0.56 71 601 11.1 7800 1.8 0.07 0.01 0.10
Gold Lake 0.060 0.92 484 8.6 6409 1.5 0.14 0.08 0.17
Castaic Lake 0.051 1.73 340 2267 46.5 1518 3.8 0.05 0.03 0.09
Lewiston Lake 73 675 31.2 1906 4.7 0.10 0.09 0.10
Lake
Lake Properties Sediment
Table4a. Continued.Arithmeticmeanconcentrationsinfish,sediment,andwater;andlakepropertiesforallofthelakesinthestatewidesurvey.Bassdataaremeansfor12individuals.Preyfishdataaremeansacrosstwoormorespecies.*-AverageofuncensoredvaluesbelowMDLs.**-AverageincludingbothdetectedvaluesanduncensoredvaluesbelowMDLs.
Total
Mercury,
Open
Water
(mg/kg
dw)
Largemou
th Bass
(350 mm
std size)
Mercury
(ug/g ww)
Prey Fish
Mercury
(ug/g ww)
Lake-
wide
Average
Total
Mercury
(ng/L)
Total
Mercury
(ng/L) -
Bank,
Near
bottom
Total
Mercury
(ng/L) -
Bank,
Near
surface
Total
Mercury
(ng/L) -
Open
Water,
Near
bottom
Total
Mercury
(ng/L) -
Open
Water,
Near
surface
Lake-
wide
Average
Methylm
ercury
(ng/L)
Methyl-
mercury
(ng/L) -
Bank,
Near
bottom
Methylm
ercury
(ng/L) -
Bank,
Near
surface
Methyl-
mercury
(ng/L) -
Open
Water,
Near
bottom
Methyl-
mercury
(ng/L) -
Open
Water,
Near
surface
Lake-
wide
Average
SO4
(mg/L)
SO4
(mg/L) -
Bank,
Near
bottom
SO4
(mg/L) -
Bank,
Near
surface
SO4
(mg/L) -
Open
Water,
Near
bottom
SO4
(mg/L) -
Open
Water,
Near
surface
Lake-
wide
Average
Chloro-
phyll a
(ug/L)
Lake-
wide
Average
DOC
(mg/L)
DOC
(mg/L) -
Bank,
Near
bottom
DOC
(mg/L) -
Bank,
Near
surface
0.24 Lake Merced 0.28 0.022 0.67 0.67 0.57 0.81 0.58 **0.05 0.07 0.05 **0.04 **0.04 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.4 7.6 40 7.7 7.7 8.1
0.11 Lake Gregory 0.25 0.029 0.98 0.65 0.46 1.91 0.48 **0.16 0.04 *0.02 0.40 0.05 2.5 3.1 3.0 1.4 3.0 < 24 6.0 6.3 6.1
0.04 Lake Jennings 0.25 0.059 0.18 0.15 0.27 0.19 0.14 *0.02 *0.01 *0.04 *0.02 *0.01 169.7 169.0 167.0 170.5 170.5 < 24 3.5 3.4 3.5
0.11 Legg Lake 0.18 0.012 0.87 0.88 0.57 1.16 0.56 **0.03 *0.04 *0.03 **0.03 *0.04 153.8 147.0 154.0 158.5 152.5 < 24 2.8 2.7 2.7
0.04 Castaic Lagoon 0.15 0.024 0.30 0.30 0.31 0.35 0.24 *0.02 *0.01 *0.03 *0.03 *0.01 98.4 100.0 103.0 98.8 95.1 < 24 3.7 3.8 4.0
0.07 Bass Lake 0.13 0.029 0.37 0.27 0.26 0.91 0.21 *0.01 *0.00 *0.00 *0.03 *0.00 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 < 24 2.4 2.4 2.6
0.09 Lopez Lake 0.12 0.018 0.61 0.61 **0.10 *0.02 0.05 0.25 *0.02 120.7 122.0 122.0 118.0 122.0 38 6.5 7.2 6.8
0.06 Palmdale Lake 0.11 0.007 0.37 0.37 0.36 0.35 0.37 *0.01 *0.01 *0.01 *0.01 *0.01 67.3 67.2 67.6 66.9 67.7 < 24 3.0 2.8 2.9
0.05 Antelope Lake 0.11 0.016 0.46 0.43 0.34 0.67 0.33 **0.15 0.53 *0.01 **0.17 *0.01 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 < 24 4.6 4.8 4.8
0.07 Malibou Lake 0.09 0.023 **0.14 *0.00 0.08 0.34 **0.04 841.3 866.0 848.0 821.0 846.0 68 7.5 7.5 7.4
0.19 Lake of the Pines 0.09 0.023 0.39 0.35 0.85 0.31 0.26 **0.02 *0.01 *0.00 *0.01 **0.05 5.5 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.7 < 24 3.1 3.2 4.0
Loch Lomond Reservoir 0.07 0.020 0.35 0.36 0.31 0.43 0.29 *0.01 *0.01 *0.00 *0.01 *0.01 72.5 76.8 77.7 68.8 71.4 < 24
0.01 Sunbeam Lake 0.07 0.022 0.33 0.28 0.29 0.39 0.32 **0.04 *0.02 *0.01 **0.07 *0.02 287.5 287.0 281.0 289.0 289.5 < 24 4.1 4.8 4.0
0.03 Senator Wash Reservoir 0.07 0.025 0.52 0.45 0.42 0.76 0.38 *0.02 *0.02 *0.01 *0.03 *0.02 280.7 261.0 267.0 300.5 277.5 < 24 3.1 3.1 3.2
0.05 Dixon Lake 0.06 0.016 0.29 0.15 0.14 0.60 0.11 **0.08 *0.00 *0.00 **0.22 *0.02 148.2 150.0 148.0 148.0 147.5 < 24 2.7 2.7 2.7
0.07 Lake Evans 0.05 0.009 0.70 0.84 0.62 0.74 0.63 *0.02 *0.02 *0.01 *0.03 *0.02 78.9 80.0 78.1 79.2 78.6 < 24
0.14 Lincoln Park Lake 0.05 0.017 0.91 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.80 **0.10 0.10 0.09 0.12 0.09 278.2 280.0 272.0 280.0 278.5 < 24 9.4 9.4
0.01 Lake Henshaw 0.03 0.005 1.36 1.51 1.13 1.51 1.25 **0.02 *0.02 *0.01 **0.04 *0.01 117.3 161.0 107.0 109.5 108.5 189 8.1 7.8 7.9
0.05 Prado Lake 0.02 0.003 0.44 0.47 0.40 0.52 0.36 *0.01 *0.01 *0.01 *0.00 *0.02 79.7 79.0 79.7 80.7 80.1 81 7.5 7.5 7.7
0.10 Caples Lake 0.107 0.50 0.57 0.46 0.57 0.40 *0.01 *0.01 *0.01 *0.02 *0.01 0.6 0.5 1.3 0.5 0.5 < 24 1.7 1.7 1.8
0.17 Gold Lake 0.060 0.45 0.94 0.31 0.41 0.30 **0.02 *0.01 *0.00 **0.04 *0.01 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 < 24 1.8 1.9 1.8
0.09 Castaic Lake 0.051 0.50 0.76 0.35 0.51 0.31 **0.01 **0.03 *0.00 *0.01 *0.01 52.3 50.8 53.3 53.6 51.8 < 24 2.3 2.3 2.3
0.10 Lewiston Lake 0.51 0.70 0.46 0.49 0.46 *0.01 *0.01 *0.00 *0.01 *0.01 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3 < 24 1.3 1.4 1.3
Sediment
Lake
Fish Water
Table4b. Additionalinformationonlakepropertiesforthelakesincludedinthestatewidesurvey.
Lake
Largemouth Bass (350
mm std size) Mercury
(ug/g ww)
Prey Fish Mercury
(ug/g ww)Quagga
Invasion* WaterSource Fishstocked** Chl-adata***WaterLevelsMaintained?
Water Level Data (past ~5 or more years)
Lake Merced 0.28 0.022 NoWithinwatershed-exactsourcenotspecified
Rainbowtrout,annualstocking Yes,quarterly No
Lake Gregory 0.25 0.029 No StormwaterRainbowtrout,stockedbi-monthly
Yes,maintainedlowbyPalmdaleWaterDistrict
Lake Jennings 0.25 0.059 YesImported-StateWaterProjectandColoradoRiver
Rainbowtrout&Channelcatfish,weeklystocking Notmonitored
Yes,butdrawndownyearlyduringthedryseason
Legg Lake 0.18 0.012 No
Stormwaterrunoff,reclaimedwater,potablewater,post-treatmentSuperfundsitedischarge
Rainbowtrout,laketrout,andothers,monthlystocking
Yes,dataprovidedbyRB4
Yes,asneededtocreatespaceforstormwaterrunoff No specific reference
Castaic Lagoon 0.15 0.024 Yes,minor Imported;releasesfromCastaicLakeProbablynot;existingblackbassarefished
Yes,dataprovidedbyRB4 Possibly http://castaic.lakesonline.com/Level.asp
Bass Lake 0.13 0.029 NoSanJoaquinRiver,WillowCreektributary
Yes,rainbowtroutandfingerlingkokaneesalmonbyCDFW https://basslakeca.com/lake.html
Lopez Lake 0.12 0.018 No
Stormwaterrunoff,ArroyoGrandeCreek(servesasmunicipalwatersupply) Yes
Palmdale Lake 0.11 0.007 NoStateWaterProject,stormwater,Littlerockreservoir Yes,byCDFW(?)
Yes,maintainedbySanBernadinoCounty
Antelope Lake 0.11 0.016 NoStateWaterProject,throughtheUpperFeatherRiverandIndianCreek
Yes,brooktrout,eaglelaketrout,andrainbowtroutbyCDFW
ConstantflowmaintainedbelowAntelopeDam CDEC
Malibou Lake 0.09 0.023 No Stormwater
Hasbluegill,largemouthbass,catfishandcarp.Maybeprivatelystockedattimes.
Yes,dataprovidedbyRB4 No
Lake of the Pines 0.09 0.023 No (servesasmunicipalwatersupply)
Loch Lomond Reservoir 0.07 0.020 No NewellCreekYes,rainbowtroutinthesummerbyCDFW
Sunbeam Lake 0.07 0.022 NoCanalwater(All-Americancanal,possibly)
Yes,bassandtroutarestocked None
Yes,bySunbeamRVPark USGS streamgage
Senator Wash Reservoir 0.07 0.025 No ColoradoRiver No None YesUSGS streamgage on the Colorado River used as a proxy
Dixon Lake 0.06 0.016 YesImported(ColoradoRiverandStateWaterProjectblend)
Rainbowtrout&Channelcatfish Yes
Lake Evans 0.05 0.009 No
Primarilygroundwaterpumpedfromthreewells.SeasonalinflowfromSpringBrookWash
Catfishstockedonceayearthrough2015
Lincoln Park Lake 0.05 0.017 NoPotable(sourcenotspecifiedinTMDL);nostormwater Rainbowtrout
Yes,dataprovidedbyRB4;Algaecidesusedtocontrolalgae
Yes,maintainedwithpotablewater No specific reference
Lake Henshaw 0.03 0.005 NoSurfacewaterrunoff,pumpedgroundwaterstoragereservoir No
No,thereareannualdiversions
Prado Lake 0.02 0.003 No Recycledwater Yes,rainbowtroutbyCDFW
Table5. NonparametricSpearmancorrelationcoefficientsforpotentialexplanatoryvariables.***=p<0.001,**=p<0.01,*=p<0.05.
Chl
orop
hyll
a
Chl
orop
hyll
a, B
ank
Nea
r-bo
ttom
Chl
orop
hyll
a, B
ank
Nea
r-su
rface
Chl
orop
hyll
a, O
pen
Wat
er
Nea
r-bo
ttom
Chl
orop
hyll
a, O
pen
Wat
er
Nea
r-su
rface
DO
C
DO
C, B
ank
Nea
r-bo
ttom
DO
C, B
ank,
Nea
r-su
rface
DO
C, O
pen
Wat
er N
ear-
botto
m
DO
C, O
pen
Wat
er N
ear-
surfa
ce
THg,
Lar
gem
outh
Bas
s
THg,
Lar
gem
outh
Bas
s, 3
50
mm
std
MeH
g in
wat
er
MeH
g in
wat
er, B
ank
Nea
r-bo
ttom
MeH
g in
wat
er, B
ank
Nea
r-su
rface
MeH
g in
wat
er, O
pen
Wat
er
Nea
r-bo
ttom
MeH
g in
wat
er, O
pen
Wat
er
Nea
r-su
rface
MeH
g / C
hlor
ophy
ll a
MeH
g / C
hlor
ophy
ll a,
Ban
k N
ear-
botto
m
MeH
g / C
hlor
ophy
ll a,
Ban
k N
ear-
surfa
ce
MeH
g / C
hlor
ophy
ll a,
Ope
n W
ater
Nea
r-bo
ttom
MeH
g / C
hlor
ophy
ll a,
Ope
n W
ater
Nea
r-su
rface
THg,
Pre
y Fi
sh
Se,
Pre
y Fi
sh
SO
4
SO
4, B
ank
Nea
r-bo
ttom
SO
4, B
ank
Nea
r-su
rface
SO
4, O
pen
Wat
er N
ear-
botto
m
SO
4, O
pen
Wat
er N
ear-
surfa
ce
THg
in s
edim
ent
THg
in w
ater
THg
in w
ater
, Ban
k N
ear-
botto
m
THg
in w
ater
, Ban
k N
ear-
surfa
ce
THg
in w
ater
, Ope
n W
ater
Nea
r-bo
ttom
THg
in w
ater
, Ope
n W
ater
Nea
r-su
rface
Dam
Hei
ght
Lake
Sur
face
Are
a
Lake
Per
imet
er
Lake
Ele
vatio
n
Lake
Sha
pe In
dex
Con
duct
ivity
Dis
solv
ed O
xyge
n, N
ear-
botto
m
Chlorophyll aChlorophyll a, Bank Near-bottom 1.00***Chlorophyll a, Bank Near-surface 0.99*** 0.99***Chlorophyll a, Open Water Near-bottom 0.91*** 0.89*** 0.86***Chlorophyll a, Open Water Near-surface 1.00*** 1.00*** 0.99*** 0.89***DOC 0.65** 0.65** 0.64** 0.60** 0.65** DOC, Bank Near-bottom 0.65** 0.65** 0.64** 0.60** 0.65** 1.00***DOC, Bank, Near-surface 0.75*** 0.74*** 0.74*** 0.69*** 0.74*** 0.99*** 0.99***DOC, Open Water Near-bottom 0.65** 0.65** 0.65** 0.60** 0.65** 0.99*** 0.98*** 0.96***DOC, Open Water Near-surface 0.65** 0.64** 0.64** 0.60** 0.64** 0.99*** 0.99*** 0.98*** 0.99***THg, Largemouth Bass -0.23 -0.25 -0.21 -0.24 -0.25 -0.25 -0.24 -0.07 -0.30 -0.24THg, Largemouth Bass, 350 mm std -0.20 -0.21 -0.16 -0.24 -0.21 -0.23 -0.23 -0.08 -0.25 -0.19 0.93***MeHg in water 0.22 0.23 0.27 0.11 0.23 0.66** 0.65** 0.60** 0.65** 0.67*** 0.14 0.23MeHg in water, Bank Near-bottom 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.45* 0.43 0.36 0.39 0.44* -0.01 0.08 0.64***MeHg in water, Bank Near-surface 0.37 0.37 0.40 0.28 0.37 0.73*** 0.72*** 0.65** 0.72*** 0.74*** 0.29 0.37 0.81*** 0.49* MeHg in water, Open Water Near-bottom 0.20 0.21 0.26 0.08 0.21 0.44* 0.43* 0.39 0.50* 0.46* 0.00 0.17 0.72*** 0.26 0.50* MeHg in water, Open Water Near-surface 0.23 0.22 0.23 0.21 0.22 0.57** 0.59** 0.56* 0.53* 0.55** 0.04 -0.02 0.72*** 0.35 0.53** 0.38MeHg / Chlorophyll a -0.28 -0.28 -0.25 -0.37 -0.28 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.22 0.25 0.21 0.27 0.83*** 0.63** 0.56** 0.55** 0.60** MeHg / Chlorophyll a, Bank Near-bottom -0.45* -0.47* -0.46* -0.39 -0.47* 0.07 0.06 -0.05 0.03 0.07 0.28 0.33 0.53** 0.81*** 0.35 0.17 0.29 0.78***MeHg / Chlorophyll a, Bank Near-surface -0.29 -0.29 -0.26 -0.30 -0.29 0.27 0.26 0.12 0.25 0.27 0.46* 0.51* 0.67*** 0.46* 0.77*** 0.35 0.39 0.76*** 0.67***MeHg / Chlorophyll a, Open Water Near-bottom -0.10 -0.09 -0.03 -0.24 -0.09 0.20 0.19 0.11 0.25 0.21 0.11 0.28 0.63** 0.13 0.42* 0.90*** 0.32 0.64*** 0.27 0.47* MeHg / Chlorophyll a, Open Water Near-surface -0.39 -0.41 -0.39 -0.37 -0.41 0.09 0.11 0.01 0.06 0.09 0.26 0.20 0.55** 0.35 0.29 0.24 0.76*** 0.78*** 0.62** 0.57** 0.35THg, Prey Fish -0.38 -0.39 -0.35 -0.37 -0.39 -0.52* -0.52* -0.54* -0.53* -0.53* 0.63** 0.55* -0.06 -0.14 -0.03 -0.03 -0.23 0.08 0.17 0.27 0.13 0.04Se, Prey Fish -0.18 -0.16 -0.11 -0.31 -0.16 -0.08 -0.08 -0.18 -0.02 -0.06 -0.06 -0.14 0.05 -0.26 0.10 0.09 -0.03 0.07 -0.19 0.20 0.16 0.02 0.12SO4 0.24 0.25 0.27 0.17 0.25 0.44* 0.44* 0.34 0.48* 0.45* -0.25 -0.30 0.42* 0.02 0.52* 0.22 0.48* 0.24 -0.10 0.35 0.16 0.22 -0.23 0.76***SO4, Bank Near-bottom 0.27 0.28 0.29 0.22 0.28 0.49* 0.50* 0.38 0.54* 0.51* -0.32 -0.37 0.42* 0.03 0.50* 0.24 0.47* 0.20 -0.12 0.31 0.14 0.19 -0.25 0.74*** 0.99***SO4, Bank Near-surface 0.24 0.25 0.27 0.17 0.25 0.45* 0.46* 0.33 0.49* 0.47* -0.26 -0.31 0.42* 0.03 0.53** 0.22 0.48* 0.24 -0.09 0.36 0.16 0.22 -0.24 0.74*** 1.00*** 0.99***SO4, Open Water Near-bottom 0.24 0.25 0.27 0.17 0.25 0.42 0.43 0.32 0.46* 0.43* -0.25 -0.30 0.40 0.00 0.51* 0.21 0.47* 0.22 -0.12 0.34 0.15 0.21 -0.21 0.77*** 1.00*** 0.99*** 1.00***SO4, Open Water Near-surface 0.24 0.25 0.27 0.17 0.25 0.45* 0.46* 0.34 0.49* 0.47* -0.26 -0.31 0.42* 0.03 0.53** 0.23 0.48* 0.24 -0.10 0.36 0.17 0.22 -0.24 0.75*** 1.00*** 0.99*** 1.00*** 1.00***THg in sediment -0.13 -0.14 -0.10 -0.18 -0.14 -0.07 -0.05 -0.12 -0.09 -0.05 0.48* 0.39 0.37 0.14 0.11 0.15 0.47* 0.42 0.34 0.17 0.26 0.56** 0.15 -0.36 -0.25 -0.27 -0.24 -0.25 -0.23THg in water 0.36 0.36 0.37 0.31 0.36 0.37 0.35 0.27 0.35 0.38 -0.21 -0.16 0.55** 0.67*** 0.34 0.28 0.43* 0.34 0.36 0.09 0.08 0.20 -0.28 -0.30 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.37THg in water, Bank Near-bottom 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.12 0.10 -0.04 0.10 0.14 -0.26 -0.25 0.35 0.53* 0.11 0.10 0.24 0.15 0.26 -0.09 -0.08 0.07 -0.19 -0.29 -0.06 -0.03 -0.06 -0.06 -0.05 0.39 0.88***THg in water, Bank Near-surface 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.32 0.33 0.27 0.26 0.32 -0.19 -0.23 0.41 0.51* 0.24 -0.06 0.53* 0.20 0.25 0.00 -0.27 0.31 -0.31 -0.40 0.01 0.04 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.46* 0.85*** 0.74***THg in water, Open Water Near-bottom 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.34 0.31 0.23 0.32 0.31 -0.12 -0.05 0.45* 0.53* 0.29 0.56** 0.29 0.28 0.29 0.08 0.36 0.11 -0.25 -0.22 -0.02 -0.01 -0.01 0.00 -0.02 0.07 0.73*** 0.53* 0.43THg in water, Open Water Near-surface 0.44* 0.45* 0.46* 0.35 0.45* 0.48* 0.46* 0.38 0.46* 0.49* -0.28 -0.21 0.57** 0.62** 0.43* 0.29 0.46* 0.33 0.28 0.12 0.08 0.19 -0.41 -0.20 0.13 0.17 0.15 0.13 0.14 0.28 0.95*** 0.81*** 0.84*** 0.65** Dam Height -0.05 -0.02 0.02 -0.19 -0.02 -0.23 -0.25 -0.17 -0.19 -0.23 0.15 0.10 -0.27 -0.34 -0.32 0.08 -0.51* -0.23 -0.36 -0.32 0.04 -0.40 0.27 0.24 -0.19 -0.16 -0.20 -0.17 -0.20 -0.20 -0.27 -0.40 -0.38 -0.05 -0.29Lake Surface Area 0.19 0.20 0.22 0.11 0.20 -0.10 -0.14 0.06 -0.12 -0.10 0.11 0.19 -0.26 0.00 -0.24 -0.07 -0.54* -0.35 -0.18 -0.36 -0.23 -0.48* 0.09 -0.23 -0.48* -0.45 -0.51* -0.46* -0.51* -0.27 -0.07 -0.15 -0.08 0.00 -0.05 0.54* Lake Perimeter 0.15 0.17 0.20 0.00 0.17 -0.09 -0.11 0.09 -0.12 -0.10 0.15 0.17 -0.24 -0.06 -0.17 -0.11 -0.57* -0.28 -0.20 -0.29 -0.21 -0.51* 0.18 -0.02 -0.32 -0.31 -0.34 -0.31 -0.34 -0.27 -0.18 -0.29 -0.21 -0.16 -0.15 0.63** 0.91***Lake Elevation -0.16 -0.15 -0.15 -0.12 -0.15 -0.21 -0.23 -0.14 -0.14 -0.17 -0.01 0.09 -0.32 -0.20 -0.44 0.08 -0.43 -0.30 -0.16 -0.33 0.05 -0.33 0.03 -0.43 -0.64** -0.58** -0.64** -0.64** -0.64** -0.04 -0.10 -0.15 -0.09 0.03 -0.25 0.41 0.46* 0.27Lake Shape Index -0.30 -0.27 -0.23 -0.45 -0.27 -0.30 -0.30 -0.20 -0.38 -0.36 0.22 0.25 0.12 0.23 -0.05 0.20 -0.14 0.39 0.27 0.14 0.25 0.08 0.38 0.22 -0.08 -0.13 -0.10 -0.09 -0.10 -0.12 -0.20 -0.41 -0.35 0.00 -0.26 0.44 0.38 0.56* -0.03Conductivity 0.39 0.33 0.33 0.48 0.33 0.37 0.37 0.14 0.38 0.37 -0.25 -0.37 0.15 0.00 0.70* 0.03 0.32 0.15 -0.08 0.35 0.05 -0.02 -0.12 0.20 0.82** 0.78* 0.82** 0.82** 0.82** 0.22 0.29 0.64 0.61 0.18 0.40 -0.43 -0.70* -0.50 -0.68* -0.25Dissolved Oxygen, Near-bottom -0.58 -0.64 -0.64 -0.30 -0.64 -0.27 -0.27 -0.64 -0.35 -0.27 -0.30 -0.23 -0.33 0.17 -0.02 -0.73* -0.02 0.00 0.32 0.45 -0.65 0.35 -0.62 -0.15 0.32 0.25 0.32 0.32 0.32 -0.05 0.17 0.43 0.25 -0.07 -0.02 -0.72* -0.52 -0.53 -0.23 -0.32 0.35pH -0.21 -0.25 -0.25 -0.09 -0.25 0.32 0.32 0.02 0.25 0.32 -0.31 -0.21 0.01 0.41 0.21 -0.64 -0.08 -0.08 0.38 0.20 -0.71* 0.16 -0.29 -0.25 -0.09 -0.07 -0.09 -0.09 -0.09 0.09 0.00 0.22 0.33 -0.52 0.32 -0.51 0.17 0.13 -0.26 -0.37 0.03 0.43
Mixed-Effects Models
! Dependent Variable: Largemouth Bass, 350 mm size standardized (log transformed)
! Random Variables1. Lake – account for spatial autocorrelation2. Prey Species / Lake (nested random effect)
! Fixed Variables: various additive combinations of:• Prey fish Hg• Water parameter (MeHg)• Sediment parameter (Total Mercury)• Lake property parameter (Lake Shape Index)
Table6. Linearmixed-effectsmodelcandidatesetfor350mmlargemouthbassmercury(dependentvariable).Preyfishspecies/lakewasincludedinthemodelasanestedrandomeffect.P-valueshighlightedinredindicatesignificantfactorsineachmodel.Modelshighlightedingreywerenotconsideredbetterthanthenullmodel.
Factorp-values
FixedEffects AICc InterceptTHgPreyFish MeHgwater THgsediment
LakeShapeIndex
Null 3008.671 THgPreyFish+LakeShapeIndex 2993.053 0 0.0001 0.15THgPreyFish 2993.178 0 0.0001 THgPreyFish+THgsediment+LakeShapeIndex 2994.894 0 0.0001 0.69 0.15THgPreyFish+THgsediment 2995.039 0 0.0001 0.71THgPreyFish+MeHgwater+LakeShapeIndex 2995.043 0 0.0001 0.92 0.15THgPreyFish+MeHgwater 2995.168 0 0.0001 0.92THgPreyFish+MeHgwater+THgsediment+LakeShapeIndex 2996.883 0 0.0001 0.92 0.69 0.15THgPreyFish+MeHgwater+THgsediment 2997.025 0 0.0001 0.01 0.71 LakeShapeIndex 3007.033 0 0.05THgsediment+LakeShapeIndex 3008.968 0 0.8 0.05MeHgwater+LakeShapeIndex 3009.03 0 0.95 0.05THgsediment 3010.600 0 0.79MeHgwater 3010.666 0 0.95MeHgwater+THgsediment+LakeShapeIndex 3010.964 0 0.95 0.8 0.05
! Mystery remains unsolved! Clear relationship with prey fish! Lake shape also an influence! Positive association of bank aqueous MeHg/Chl-a and
350 mm bass Hg! Negative association of DOC and prey fish Hg! Analysis handicapped by
• Limited range in bass mercury• Detection limit and data issues
! Approaches to solving the mystery• Expanding the empirical dataset• Intensive process studies at selected lakes
MQ2: Why do some lakes have relatively low concentrations of methylmercury in sport fish?
! Approaches to solving the mystery• Expanding the empirical dataset
! More lakes, wider range of bass Hg
! Complete and quantitative datasets
! Spatially and temporally representative data
! Solid information on lake and watershed attributes
• Intensive process studies at selected lakes
MQ2: Why do some lakes have relatively low concentrations of methylmercury in sport fish?
MQ3: Did the 2007-8 survey accurately characterize the status of lakes in which only rainbow trout were collected?
! Minimally addressed! Would require greater effort per lake! Small dataset provides strong indication that
rainbow trout do not indicate general status of mercury in the food web
! Significant information gap! Prey fish a useful indicator for trout lakes
Next Steps
1. Written corrections by Feb 202. Finalize technical report - March3. Draft a fact sheet? - March?4. BOG review of fact sheet5. Finalize fact sheet
! Desired outcome: Obtain input on the plan and timeline for reporting the data and posting it to CEDEN and the Safe to Eat Portal.
2017
! Sport fish• Focus on bass and mercury• PCBs and OCs in bottom-feeder in
selected lakes (20% for PCBs)• New: Selenium in composites of all
species! Prey fish• Mercury and selenium (New) in
composites
Table1. Panel 2, 2017 BOG Fish Collection Summary
Region Waterbody Sport fish Prey spp
Black Bass Spp
Common Carp Bluegill Redear Green
Sunfish Catfish
Spp Crappie Brown Bullhead Other Bass
Spp Bluegill Threadfin
shad Silverside Green sunfish other
1 Iron Gate Reservoir 11 10 10 10 30
1 Pillsbury, Lake 22 20 20
2
Upper San Leandro
Reservoir 11 10 10 10 10 10
2 San Pablo Reservoir 11 10 10 10
2 Nicasio Reservoir 11 7 10 10 10
2 Coyote Lake 11 10 10 10 10
3 Cachuma, Lake 22 10 20 20
3 Pinto Lake 11 6 5 10 10
3 N Reservoir 11 10 10
3 Lopez Lake 11 10 10 10
3 Santa Margarita Lake 11 10 10 10 10
4 Crystal Lake
4 Wilderness Park Lake 4 9 10 10
4 Magic Johnson Lakes 11 10 10 10 10
4 Alondra Park Lake 11 10 10 10 7
4 Elizabeth Lake
5 New Hogan Lake 33 30 30
5 Whiskeytown Lake 33 30 30
5 Natomas, Lake 11 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
5 Isabella Lake 22 4 20 20 20
5
Mile Long Pond (One Mile
Lake) 11 10 10 10 10 10
5 Black Butte Lake 11 20 10 10
5 Davis Creek Reservoir 11 10 10 10
5 Los Banos Reservoir 11 10 10 10 10
5 Pardee Reservoir 22 20 10
5 Webb, Lake 11 10 10 10 10
5 Mountain Meadows Reservoir
5 Collins Lake 11 10 3 10 10 10 10
5 Lake of the Pines 11 10 10 10 10
5 Hensley Lake 19 10 6 11 1 8 20 20 21
6 Palmdale Lake 11 16 8 12 11 10 10 10 10 10
6 Silverwood Lake 11 3 10 9 6 5 10 10 11
7 Ferguson Lake 11 10
8 Elsinore, Lake 2
8 Evans Lake 8
9 Skinner Reservoir 11 10 7 10 1
9 Hodges, Lake 11 10 10 10
9 Jennings, Lake 11 10 10 10
9 Laguna Niguel Park Lake (Sulphur Ck Res) 11 10 10 10
9 Sutherland, Lake 11 10 10 10 10
Timeline for Releasing the 2017 Data! Sampling – Completed in September 2017! Analysis – Completed in xx! State Board QA review and upload – Upload completed
xx, QA report completed xx! SFEI review and data “report” generation – xx – issue to
resolve regarding data flow! BOG review – xx! Upload to CEDEN and Portal – xx
Item 7: General Timeline for 2018! Clean Lakes – final tech report in March – fact
sheet?! 2015 Bass Lakes – final data report in March! 2016 Lakes – final data report and posting in
March! 2017 Bass Lakes – final data report in xx ! 2018 Bight – intercalibration in April (June) –
sampling in May-Oct – sample distribution begins in June
! Water Boards Science Symposium in June