ItAIS Presentation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 ItAIS Presentation

    1/12

    CHANGING SPACESFOR SOCIAL LEARNING

    IN THE IMPLEMENTATION BIOGRAPHYOF AN ERP SYSTEM

    Gian Marco Campagnolo

    Dep. of Sociology and Social ResearchUniversity of Trento

    [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 8/14/2019 ItAIS Presentation

    2/12

    We wanted to see SAP from thepoint of view of the project or ofthe plan, not from the accountingpoint of view [...]. But the logichas been changed.

    (Dante Province ERP PM).

    [...] I asked that feasibility would bedone by SAP and not by others.

    Unfortunately, in both cases, it has beendecided to establish a Consortium includinglocal University consultants, the in-houseIT company and a third consulting firm. SAPis not part of the consortium. (DanteProvince ERP PM).

    [...] the Consortium is more or less like the in-house IT company. [...] they customized the systemmore than what they had to do - now we will comeback...-, the same will be with theConsortium (Dante Province ERP PM).

    Field Interviews

    Excerpts

  • 8/14/2019 ItAIS Presentation

    3/12

    ...efficiency

    accountability......administrative decentralization

    - motivations to implement an ERP system have been extensivelyinvestigated. Less has been said about the changes of motivations inextended periods.

    :::

    ...make or buypackaged software or best of breed......customize the package

    focus upon documenting the various forms of customization andadaptation processes and not about how these forms can evolve,and combine and relate to each other on single organizationalcases.

    Reviewing the literature

  • 8/14/2019 ItAIS Presentation

    4/12

    a single industry solution is not going to bebest from all perspectives.. (and for ever, I

    would add)

    administrative/academic cultures

    best practice= the dominant perspective

    antagonism or absence of choice?

  • 8/14/2019 ItAIS Presentation

    5/12

    antagonism or absence of choice?

  • 8/14/2019 ItAIS Presentation

    6/12

    organizational moves (Pentland, 1992) abduction (Pierce, 1958)

    Theoretical Framework

    Social Learning inTechnologicalInnovation

    (Williams et al.,2005; Stewart &Hyssalo 2008)

  • 8/14/2019 ItAIS Presentation

    7/12

    Methodology

    Research SettingDante Province; SAP R/3 implementation;1998-2009 (10 differentmodules/applications)

    Research Approach

    how actors (top managers; Operative and Staff Services; key users;project managers; developers and consultants) make sense ofimplementation choices

    Data Collection MethodBiographic interviews; Document Analysis; Observation - 2 years

    fieldwork (2007-2009)

  • 8/14/2019 ItAIS Presentation

    8/12

    4 PERIODS: 1998-2002,2002-2005,2005-2008,

    2009-...

    moving locus of

    implementation choices

    Analysis

    =

    =sense made of notions likestandardization/customizations

    =

    =

    the map of a space: thesupply/use space

    four time periods

    = an implementation trajectory

  • 8/14/2019 ItAIS Presentation

    9/12

    Steering Committee

    PM

    IT in-house developers

    in-house ITCompany

    Top Managers

    Dante Province

    Top Managers

    ABAP programmingsuppliers

    givingresponsability toOperative Services

    training

    OperativeUsers

    more controls by StaffServices

    PERIOD 1998-2002

  • 8/14/2019 ItAIS Presentation

    10/12

    AccountingDepartment

    PM

    in-house ITCompany

    key userkey userkey user

    key userkey userkey userkey userkey user

    Operative

    Users

    FeasibilitySuppliers*

    Analysis

    Suppliers*

    DesignSuppliers*

    (Dept.1)(Dept.2)(Dept.3)

    (Dept.4)(Dept.5)(Dept.6)(Dept.7)(Dept.8)

    coherent with

    regulatory provisions

    *all with experience from SAPimplementation in the private

    coming from theprivate

    PERIOD 2002-2005

  • 8/14/2019 ItAIS Presentation

    11/12

    AccountingDepartment

    PM

    SAP partnershipSAPConsultantsfor PublicSector

    best practicesoftware

    a change managementtool

    Other PublicAdministrationsimplementing SAP

    Re-Use of Software

    PSUG

    in-house ITCompany

    OperativeUsers

    key userkey userkey userkey userkey userkey userkey user

    (Dept.2)(Dept.3)(Dept.4)(Dept.5)(Dept.6)(Dept.7)(Dept.8)

    FeasibilitySupplier =

    PERIOD 2005-2008

  • 8/14/2019 ItAIS Presentation

    12/12

    IT in-house company, non SAP consultants, local Univ.

    Consortium

    Other local organizations implementing SAP(85 edu institutions; 12 public agencies)

    AccountingDepartment

    PM

    aligning

    interpretationsof procedures

    key user

    key user

    key user

    key user

    key user

    key user

    key user

    (Dept.2)

    (Dept.3)

    (Dept.4)

    (Dept.5)

    (Dept.6)

    (Dept.7)

    (Dept.8)

    PERIOD 2009-...