28
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] WEEKLY LIST No. 6 OF 2021 FROM : 23-02-2021 To 25-02-2021 COURT NO. : 6 HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH NOTE :- ON 23.02.2021 REGULAR HEARING SNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate 1 Crl.A. No. 2024/2008 II-C PAPPATHI @ KUPPATHAL S. RAVI SHANKAR[P-1] Versus THE STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ORS. ETC. M. YOGESH KANNA, [R-1], GEETHA KOVILAN[R-2][PR], [R-3][PR], [R-4][PR], [R-5][PR], [R-6][PR], [R-7][PR] 2 Crl.A. No. 1041/2007 II-C SHIVARAJ . AND ANR. SUPREETA SHARANAGOUDA, [P-1], [P-2] Versus STATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1] 3 C.A. No. 2646/2009 XVII-A BAR OF INDIAN LAWYERS THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT JASBIR SIGH MALIK DAYA KRISHAN SHARMA Versus D.K.GANDHI PS NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES AND ANR. RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON Connected C.A. No. 2647/2009 XVII-A DELHI HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT MOHINDER JIT SINGH[P-1] Versus D.K.GANDHI PS NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES AND ANR. RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON Connected C.A. No. 2649/2009 XVII-A M.MATHIAS DAYA KRISHAN SHARMA Versus D.K.GANDHI PS NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON Connected C.A. No. 2648/2009 XVII-A BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA THROUGH BY ITS SECRETARY MR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD Versus D.K.GANDHI . PS NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES AND ANR. DAYA KRISHAN SHARMA, RESPONDENT-IN- PERSON Connected C.A. No. 6959/2011 XVII-A PANDIT DNYANDEV UBALE ASHOK KUMAR SINGH Versus DNYANESHWAR RAMHARI PHOPLE Connected C.A. No. 8214/2017 XVII-A A. RAGHAVENDRA ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE Versus M. RAJAMANNAR N. ANNAPOORANI

IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    8

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

[ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATESON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS

LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ]WEEKLY LIST No. 6 OF 2021 FROM : 23-02-2021 To 25-02-2021

COURT NO. : 6HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAHNOTE:-ON 23.02.2021

REGULAR HEARINGSNo. Case No. Petitioner / Respondent Petitioner/Respondent Advocate1 Crl.A. No. 2024/2008

II-CPAPPATHI @ KUPPATHAL S. RAVI SHANKAR[P-1]Versus

THE STATE BY INSPECTOR OF POLICEAND ORS. ETC.

M. YOGESH KANNA, [R-1], GEETHAKOVILAN[R-2][PR], [R-3][PR], [R-4][PR],[R-5][PR], [R-6][PR], [R-7][PR]

2 Crl.A. No. 1041/2007II-C

SHIVARAJ . AND ANR. SUPREETA SHARANAGOUDA, [P-1], [P-2]VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA SHUBHRANSHU PADHI[R-1]

3 C.A. No. 2646/2009XVII-A

BAR OF INDIAN LAWYERS THROUGHITS PRESIDENT JASBIR SIGH MALIK DAYA KRISHAN SHARMA

VersusD.K.GANDHI PS NATIONAL INSTITUTEOF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES ANDANR.

RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON

ConnectedC.A. No. 2647/2009XVII-A

DELHI HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATIONTHROUGH ITS PRESIDENT MOHINDER JIT SINGH[P-1]

VersusD.K.GANDHI PS NATIONAL INSTITUTEOF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES ANDANR.

RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON

ConnectedC.A. No. 2649/2009XVII-A

M.MATHIAS DAYA KRISHAN SHARMA

VersusD.K.GANDHI PS NATIONAL INSTITUTEOF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON

ConnectedC.A. No. 2648/2009XVII-A

BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA THROUGH BYITS SECRETARY MR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN ARDHENDUMAULI KUMAR PRASAD

VersusD.K.GANDHI . PS NATIONAL INSTITUTEOF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES ANDANR.

DAYA KRISHAN SHARMA, RESPONDENT-IN-PERSON

ConnectedC.A. No. 6959/2011XVII-A

PANDIT DNYANDEV UBALE ASHOK KUMAR SINGH

VersusDNYANESHWAR RAMHARI PHOPLE

ConnectedC.A. No. 8214/2017XVII-A

A. RAGHAVENDRA ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE

VersusM. RAJAMANNAR N. ANNAPOORANI

Page 2: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 64 C.A. No.

3180-3182/2016III

K.J.SOMAIYA MEDICAL COL. AND ANR. PAREKH & CO.

Versus

MAHARASHTRA UNIV.OF HEALTH SC..AND ORS.

AMIT KUMAR, SARLA CHANDRA, NISHANTRAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR, GAURAVAGRAWAL

ConnectedC.A. No.3183-3185/2016III

K.J.SOMAIYA MED.COLLEGE AND ANR. PAREKH & CO.

Versus

MAHARASHTRA UNIV.OF HEALTH SC..AND ORS.

GAURAV AGRAWAL, SARLA CHANDRA,NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR,GOPAL SINGH, GAURAV SHARMA

5 C.A. No.9981-9982/2011IV

MAHANT GURMUKH SINGH(D) BY LRS. ROHIT KUMAR SINGH

VersusSHROMANI GURDWARAPRABND.COMMITT.

KAMALDEEP GULATIJYOTI MENDIRATTA[INT][PR]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9983/2011IV

MAHANT GURMUKH SINGH (D) TR.LRS. JYOTI MENDIRATTA

VersusSHIROMANI GURDWARA PRABANDAKCOMMIT. KAMALDEEP GULATI

6 C.A. No. 6991/2015XII

THE DIRECTOR OF TEACHERSTRAINING RESEARCH EDUCATION ANDANR.

VINODH KANNA B.[P-1][GR]

VersusO.M.JESSYMOL V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6992/2015XII

A.S.KUPPUSAMY RAKESH K. SHARMA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU . AND ORS. VINODH KANNA B.[R-1][GR]

7 C.A. No. 2297/2011XVI

M/S.K.B.TEA PRODUCT PVT.LTD. ANDANR. KAVITA JHA

VersusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,SILIGURI .AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2299/2011XVI

MADHU BANSAL AND ANR. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,SILLIGURI .AND ORS.

PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1], MADHUMITABHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2298/2011XVI

M/S MODANWAL TEA CENTRE ANDANR. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusASSISTANT COMMR.OF COMMERCIALTAX . AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2305/2011XVI

M/S.SHIB SHAKTI TEA PACKETERS ANDANR. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,SILIGURI .AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2300/2011XVI

M/S.M.S.TEA .AND AGRO CO. AND ANR. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,SILIGURI .AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

Page 3: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No. 2301/2011XVI

M/S.DALMIA ENTERPRIESES AND ANR. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

Versus

COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER . AND ORS. MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2304/2011XVI

M/S VIKASH PACKERS AND EXPORTSAND ANR. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

Versus

COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER . AND ORS. PLR CHAMBERS AND CO.[R-1], MADHUMITABHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2302/2011XVI

M/S LOCHAN TEA LTD. AND ANR. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

Versus

COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER . AND ORS. MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2303/2011XVI

M/S M.B.TEA AND ALLIED PRODUCTSPVT. LTD. KAVITA JHA[P-1]

VersusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,SILIGURI .AND ORS.

MADHUMITA BHATTACHARJEE[R-1], [R-2],[R-3], [R-4]

8 C.A. No. 5564/2009IV

IMPROVEMENT TRUST ROPAR BIRENDRA KUMAR MISHRA[P-1]VersusSHASHI BALA AND ANR. JAGJIT SINGH CHHABRA

9 C.A. No. 10639/2010XVI

AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA M. V. KINI & ASSOCIATES[P-1]VersusDILIP BHUSHAN AND ORS. SARLA CHANDRA[R-1], SUSHMA SURI[R-1]

10 C.A. No. 1949/2010XI-A

KANIKA DEY RUTWIK PANDA[P-1]Versus

TRUPTIRANI PARIDA AND ORS. SUNIL KUMAR JAIN[R-1], SIBO SANKARMISHRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-3], K. L. JANJANI[R-4]

11 C.A. No. 4203/2010XIV-A

MUNICIPAL CORPN OF DELHI RAKESH KUMAR-IVersusM/S. KAY KAY CORPN.

12 C.A. No. 4064/2010OTHERS

RAMCHANDRA SAKHARAMGALANDE(D)TR.LRS.&OR ANAGHA S. DESAI

VersusSITARAM DNYANU GALANDE(D)TR.LRS.. AND ORS. K. N. RAI

13 C.A. No.8904-8907/2010IV

M/S.SHIVALI ENTERPRISES ETC. RISHI MALHOTRA

Versus

GODAWARI (D) THR.LRS. AND ORS. ETC.ABHISHEK ATREY, [R-1.6], [R-1.4], M. A.CHINNASAMY, AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA, A.VENAYAGAM BALAN

ConnectedC.A. No. 8908/2010IV

AJIT SINGH AND ORS. A. VENAYAGAM BALAN

VersusM/S SHIVALI ENTERPRISES

14 C.A. No.6182-6183/2009XIV-A

BAINI PRASAD (D) THR. LRS. (MRS. ) VIPIN GUPTA[P-1]

VersusDURGA DEVI RAJESH SRIVASTAVA[R-1]

15 C.A. No. 3603/2011XI-A

T. P. SARASA HIMINDER LAL[P-1]Versus

STATE OF KERALA . AND ORS. G. PRAKASH[R-1], BIJU P RAMAN[R-1],ASHWANI BHARDWAJ[R-1]

Page 4: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 616 C.A. No. 4247/2009

XII-AN.RAVINDRA MURTHY ANJANI AIYAGARIVersus

VEERBHADRA SWAMY TEMPLE ANDORS.

V. N. RAGHUPATHY, [R-4][PR], GUNTURPRABHAKAR, VENKAT PALWAI LAWASSOCIATES[R-2], [R-3]

and IA No.89629/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS17 C.A. No. 4645/2011

XIIS.RAMASWAMY S. R. SETIAVersusMANAGEMENT OF CANARA BANK . ANDORS. MADHU SIKRI

18 C.A. No. 6144/2010XV

M/S PEACOCK INDUSTRIES LTD. PRATIBHA JAINVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR, B. KRISHNA PRASAD

19 C.A. No. 5178/2008IV-A

ACC LTD. GAGRAT AND CO[P-1]VersusCOMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,BALGAUM-I B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

20 C.A. No.7138-7147/2009IX

COMMR.OF CUSTOMS(EXPORTS)NHEVASHEVA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusBAKUL PAREKH ETC. ETC.

ConnectedS.L.P.(C)...CC No.2522/2010IX

THE UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

A.S. VASAN AND SONS (BOMBAY) K. L. JANJANI

21 C.A. No. 8225/2009IX

CHOWGULE & COMPANY LTD. PAREKH & CO.VersusASSISTANT DIRECTOR GEN.OFFOREN.TRD.&ORS ANIL KATIYAR[R-1]

22 C.A. No. 3110/2011X

COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE,MEERUT1 ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]

VersusM/S RISHABH VALVELEEN (P) LTD. THR.ITS DIRECTOR TANUJ BAGGA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3109/2011X

COMMR.OF CENTRAL EXCISE,MEERUT SHREEKANT N. TERDAL[P-1]

VersusM/S RISHABH VALVELEEN(P) LTD.DIRECTOR TANUJ BAGGA[R-1]

23 Crl.A. No. 2178/2009II-B

RAJBIR K. K. MOHANVersusTHE STATE OF HARYANA MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1]

24 C.A. No. 266-268/2010XVII-A

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, KHADIEVAM GRAMODHYOG COMMISSIONAND ORS.

CHANDRA PRAKASH

VersusABDUL MATIN AND ORS. MUSHTAQ AHMAD

25 Crl.A. No. 1721/2009II

KESHAV KUMAR GUPTA SONAL JAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANKIT GOEL[R-1]

26 Crl.A. No. 1096/2009II-B

DILBAGH SINGH @ BAGHAVersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. RANJEETA ROHATGI[R-1]

Page 5: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 6

27 C.A. No. 3773/2011III-A

M/S TRIVENI GLASS LIMITED THROUGHITS DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER(SALES AND P.R.) R.K. SINHA

ANISH AGARWAL[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX, U.P. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 29516/2013XI

M/S TRIVENI GLASS LTD ANISH AGARWAL[P-1]

VersusASSISTANT COMMR.(ASSTT.)TRADE TAX BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedSLP(C) No.12236-12237/2018XI

M/S TRIVENI GLASS LTD. ANISH AGARWAL[P-1]

Versus

COMMISSIONER TRADE TAX U. P. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.54910/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.and IA No.54907/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

ConnectedDiary No. 10047-2018XI

TRIVENI GLASS LIMITED ANISH AGARWAL[P-1]

VersusCOMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.66415/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.66417/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IANo.66416/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING

28 C.A. No. 2759/2009XVII-A

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTDTHROUGH ITS MANAGER MANJEET CHAWLA

VersusM/S.BHUSHAN STEEL AND STRIPS LTD. MANIK KARANJAWALAFOR ON IA 3/2009 FOR ON IA 29850/2009

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 10001/2009XVII-A

BHUSHAN STEEL AND STRIP LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

VersusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. MANJEET CHAWLA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.5242-5243/2009XVII-A

BHUSHAN STEEL AND STRIPS LTD. KARANJAWALA & CO.

Versus

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO.LTD. MANJEET CHAWLAFOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA3/2009 FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL ON IA 1/2009

29 C.A. No.6690-6692/2009XVII-A

S.BALACHANDRAN SIDDHARTHA CHOWDHURY

VersusM/S RAMANIYAM REAL ESTATES LTD. NISHE RAJEN SHONKERFOR ON IA 110373/2011

30 C.A. No.6929-6930/2009XIV-A

EX. SQN. LDR. R.SOOD ABHA R. SHARMA[P-1]

VersusUNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OFDEFENCE THROUGH SECRETARY ANDORS.

ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

31 C.A. No. 5731/2009XII

SANTOSH MAIZE THROUGH ITSMANAGER K. K. MANI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADUREPRESENTED BY THE SPECIALCOMMISSIONER AND COMMISSIONEROF COMMERCIAL TAXES AND ANR.

M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

Page 6: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No. 5732/2009XII

SANTOSH MAIZE THROUGH ITSMANAGER K. K. MANI[P-1]

VersusTAMILNADU REPRESENTED BY THESPECIAL COMMISSIONER ANDCOMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIALTAXES EZHILAGAM AND AND ANR.

M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1], [R-2]

32 C.A. No. 1415/2010XII

M/S. S.P.S. JAYAM AND CO. K. V. VIJAYAKUMARVersusTAMIL NADU TAXATION SPECIALTRIBUNAL THE REGISTRAR . AND ORS. R. NEDUMARAN

ConnectedC.A. No. 1416/2010XII

M/S. S.P.S. JAYAM AND CO. THR.PROPRIETOR MADHUSMITA BORA[P-1]

VersusT.N.TAXATION SPL.TRIBUNAL AND ORSTHE REGISTRAR R. NEDUMARAN[R-1]

33 Crl.A. No. 1722/2010II-B

NARESH KUMAR APARNA JHAVersusSTATE OF HARYANA VISHWA PAL SINGH

34 Crl.A. No. 987/2011II

MUKESH KHARE . AND ORS. SUNIL KUMAR JAINVersusTHE STATE OF UTTARAKHAND ANDANR.

T. MAHIPAL, ARDHENDUMAULI KUMARPRASAD

35 C.A. No. 2576/2010IV

M/S. MUNJAL SHOWA LTD. RAJESH KUMARVersusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ANDCENTRAL EXCISE (DELHI IV) B. KRISHNA PRASAD

ConnectedC.A. No. 5608/2011IV

M/S FRIENDS TRADING CO. ANAGHA S. DESAI

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

36 Crl.A. No. 515/2009II-A

AVINASH BHOSALE COAC[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[R-1], [R-2], SACHIN PATIL[R-3]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 516/2009II-A

DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]

VersusAVINASH BHOSALE AND ORS. COAC[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No. 7611/2009II-A

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FEMA/PMLAENFORCEMENT DIRECTORTE B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

Versus

PHILIP ANANDRAJ AND ANR. NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-1], SACHINPATIL[R-2]

37 C.A. No. 1798/2010XVI

COMMR.OF CUSTOMS (AIRPORTADMIN.)KOLKATA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusEKTARA EXPORTS PVT.LTD. SARLA CHANDRA[R-1]

38 C.A. No. 9582/2011III-A

M/S MAJHOLA DISTILLERY ANDCHEMICAL WORKS PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH[P-1]

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX/COMMERCIAL TAX U.P. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9583/2011III-A

M/S MAJHOLA DISTILLERY ANDCHEMICAL WORKS PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH[P-1]

Versus

Page 7: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 6THE COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX/COMMERCIAL TAX U.P. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9585/2011III-A

M/S.MAJHOLA DISTIL.ANDCHEM.WORKS, MAJHOLA, PILIBHIT PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF TRADETAX/COMMERCIAL TAX COMMISSIONER GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO

ConnectedC.A. No. 9584/2011III-A

M/S MAJHOLA DISTILLERY ANDCHEMICAL WORKS THROUGH GENERALMANAGER

PRAKASH KUMAR SINGH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF TRADE TAX/COMMERCIAL TAX.U.P. LUCKNOW GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO

ConnectedC.A. No. 9590/2011III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[P-1]

VersusM/S KESAR ENTERPRISES LTD.

39 C.A. No.2338-2339/2010XI-A

HEINZ INDIA LIMITED PAREKH & CO.[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF KERALA G. PRAKASH[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6633/2012XII

GLAXO SMITHKLINE PARMACEUTICALSLTD. THROUGH THE MANAGINGDIRECTOR

PAREKH & CO.

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6635/2012XII

GLAXOSMITHKLINEPHARMACEUTICALS LTD. PAREKH & CO.

VersusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1]

40 C.A. No. 5461/2010IV

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusENGLISH INDIAN CLAYS LTD. AND ORS. R. PARTHASARATHY

41 C.A. No. 6561/2008IX

CCE,MUMBAI-III B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusM/S BUNTS INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. K. RAJEEV

ConnectedC.A. No.6562-6563/2008IX

CCE, MUMBAI -III B. KRISHNA PRASAD

Versus

M/S. BUNTS INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. K. RAJEEV

42 C.A. No. 6695/2009XIV-A

THE STATE OF TRIPURA AND ANR. SHUVODEEP ROYVersusM/S.SWAPAN KUMAR PAUL AND ORS. RAJIV MEHTA, , RAJIV NANDA[R-2]

43 C.A. No.4279-4280/2009IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL ANDSERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. HITECH AUTO CRAFTS RADHA SHYAM JENA

ConnectedC.A. No. 8613/2009IV-A

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE,TRIVANDRUM B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusKERALA STATE TRANSPORTCORPORATION RADHA SHYAM JENA

Page 8: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 6

44 C.A. No. 570/2010XII

LAKSHMI VIDHYA SANGAM REP. BY ITSSECRETARY AND TREASURER MS.SHOBHANA RAMACHANDRAN

V. BALACHANDRAN

VersusTHE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICERAND ANR. T. HARISH KUMAR

45 C.A. No. 7269/2009XVI

M/S STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. R. PARTHASARATHY[P-1]VersusCOMMR.CEN.EXCISE ANDCUS.BHUBANESHWAR

ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-1]

46 C.A. No. 4001/2009IX

COMMR.OF CEN.EXE. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]VersusM/S BAJAJ ALLIANZ INSURANCECO.LTD. THR. ITS MANAGER R. PARTHASARATHY[R-1]

47 C.A. No. 3634/2009XV

M/S RAGHUVEER METAL INDUSTRIESLTD. M. P. DEVANATH

VersusTHE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE JAIPUR II ANIL KATIYAR, B. KRISHNA PRASAD

48 C.A. No. 8056/2009IX

COMMR.OF CEN.EXCISE & CUS. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusM/S SHREE VENKATESH STEELS LTD. S. NARAIN & CO.

49 C.A. No. 1013/2014XII-A

KOLLI SATYANARAYANA (SINCE DEAD)BY LRS. G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusV. KESAVA RAO CHOWDARY (D) BY LRS..AND ORS. SRIDHAR POTARAJU[R-1]

50 C.A. No. 5666/2017III

RUNNING STAFF ASSOCIATION ANDORS. RANI CHHABRA, [P-2], [P-3]

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA, [R-2]

51 C.A. No. 3566/2010IV-A

MAHAVEERCHAND G PAREKH PRIYA PURI[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], E. C. VIDYASAGAR[R-2]

List Before Appropriate Bench [released from Part-Heard] as per rp dated04.12.2019

ConnectedDiary No. 559-2019IV-A

VAGATAVARMAL AND ANR. PRIYA PURI[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. ANIRUDH SANGANERIA[R-2]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.20640/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.20646/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.20643/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

ConnectedDiary No. 599-2019IV-A

MAHAVEERCHAND AND ANR. PRIYA PURI[P-1], [P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. ANIRUDH SANGANERIA[R-2]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.18786/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.18787/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.18789/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

ConnectedC.A. No. 3567/2010IV-A

VAGATAVARMAL PRIYA PURI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF KARNTATAKA . AND ORS. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3573/2010IV-A

VAGATAVARMAL AND ORS. PRIYA PURI[P-1]

Versus

Page 9: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 6

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], E. C. VIDYASAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3571/2010IV-A

MANIKCHAND G.PAREKH PRIYA PURI[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], E. C. VIDYASAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3570/2010IV-A

PISTA DEVI PRIYA PURI[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], E. C. VIDYASAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3569/2010IV-A

MANIKCHAND G PAREKH PRIYA PURI[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. E. C. VIDYA SAGAR[R-1], [R-2], V. N.RAGHUPATHY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3572/2010IV-A

MAHAVEERCHAND G PAREKH PRIYA PURI[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], E. C. VIDYASAGAR[R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3568/2010IV-A

BHAGUDEVI M AND ANR. PRIYA PURI[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY[R-1], E. C. VIDYA SAGAR,[R-2]

ConnectedDiary No. 46890-2018IV-A

BHAGUDEVI PRIYA PURI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. ANIRUDH SANGANERIA[R-2]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.2323/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.2806/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

ConnectedDiary No. 549-2019IV-A

KAJUDEVI PRIYA PURI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. ANIRUDH SANGANERIA[R-2]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.20133/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.20136/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.20134/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

ConnectedDiary No. 554-2019IV-A

KAJUDEVI PRIYA PURI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. ANIRUDH SANGANERIA[R-2]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.20186/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.20187/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.20188/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

ConnectedDiary No. 562-2019IV-A

PISTADEVI AND ANR. PRIYA PURI[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANR. ANIRUDH SANGANERIA[R-2]IA No.21404/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.21409/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IANo.21406/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

52 Crl.A. No. 870/2010II-B

JAGJIT SINGH PRAGATI NEEKHRAVersusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

Page 10: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedCrl.A. No. 871/2010II-B

DILBHAJAN SINGH USHA NANDINI. V

VersusCBI CHANDIGARH ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

53 C.A. No. 5622/2009XVII-A

CCE, AURANGABAD ANIL KATIYAR[P-1], [P-1]VersusM/S VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LTD. THR.ITS DIRECTOR VIKAS SINGH JANGRA[R-1]

54 Crl.A. No.1296-1297/2010II-A

PRABHULAL AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN, [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5], [P-6],[P-7], [P-8]

VersusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH RAHUL KAUSHIK[R-1]

55 C.A. No. 8830/2012XII

RAMATHAL AND ORS. AND ORS. NISHE RAJEN SHONKERVersusK.RAJAMANI (DEAD) THROUGH LRSAND ANR. AND ANR. K. K. MANI

56 C.A. No.7236-7237/2009XVI

C.C.E.,KOLKATA III B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusM/S.KALYANI SPINNING MILLS LTD. DAISY HANNAH[R-1]

57 C.A. No. 1878/2010XI-A

KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORTCORPORATION DEEPAK PRAKASH[P-1]

VersusA.SAINULABDIN RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1879/2010XI-A

KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORTCORP. DEEPAK PRAKASH[P-1]

VersusP.D.OUSEPH PRASHANT PADMANABHAN[R-1]FOR ON IA 2/2012 : APPLICATION FOR DIRECTIONS

58 C.A. No.3053-3054/2010XVII-A

MR. PURANCHAND R. TANK DILIP ANNASAHEB TAUR[P-1]

VersusM/S. ELECTRONICA MACHINE TOOLSLTD. SUDARSHAN SINGH RAWAT[R-1]

59 C.A. No. 7494/2009XI-A

AMIYA KUMAR GIRI . AND ORS. ASHOK PANIGRAHI[P-1]Versus

PRADYUMNA KUMAR PURI . AND ORS.RUTWIK PANDA[R-1], SHIBASHISHMISRA[R-2], [R-3], [R-4]TEJASWI KUMAR PRADHAN[IMPL]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7495/2009XI-A

AMIYA KUMAR GIRI . AND ORS. ASHOK PANIGRAHI

VersusMAHENDRA KUMAR SATPATHY ANDORS. KEDAR NATH TRIPATHY, SHIBASHISH MISRA

60 C.A. No. 8313/2009IV-C

KRISHNA KUMARI SAURABH TRIVEDI[P-1]VersusASHOK KUMAR AND ORS. PRATIBHA JAIN[R-1]

61 C.A. No. 2857/2011OTHERS

SHRI NASHIK PANCHAVATI PANJARPOLTRUST PRESHIT VILAS SURSHE[P-1]

VersusTHE CHAIRMAN AND ANR. M. Y. DESHMUKH[R-1], SACHIN PATIL[R-2]RETAIN ITS POSITION

ConnectedC.A. No. 2858/2011OTHERS

SHREE NASIK PANCHAVATIPANJARAPOLE TRUST AND ORS. PRESHIT VILAS SURSHE[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA . AND ANR. SACHIN PATIL[R-1], M. Y. DESHMUKH[R-2]

Page 11: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 6

62 C.A. No. 2225/2011OTHERS

SANT BHAGWAN BABA SHIKSHANMANDAL THROUGH ITSSECRETARYSHAN MANDAL AND ORS.

SHIVAJI M. JADHAV[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]

VersusGUNWANT AND ORS. ANJANI KUMAR JHA[R-1], SACHIN PATIL[R-2]

63 C.A. No.4840-4844/2011IV-A

M/S. RAMAPURAM HOLIDAY RESORTSETC. ETC. MITTER & MITTER CO.

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. ETC.ETC. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

8/801 MM DTD. 11.02.2020ConnectedC.A. No. 4845/2011IV-A

M/S. SIDDHARTA RESORTS MEERA MATHUR

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No. 4847/2011IV-A

M/S. HOTEL VRINDA PRAKASH ANANTHA NARAYANA M.G.

VersusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

ConnectedC.A. No. 4846/2011IV-A

M/S. HOTEL VRINDA PRAKASH ANANTHA NARAYANA M.G.

VersusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS. V. N. RAGHUPATHY

64 C.A. No. 3271/2011III-A

M/S.SAMTEL COLOR LIMITED KAVITA JHA[P-1]VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER(ASSESSMENT) AND ANR. BHAKTI VARDHAN SINGH[R-1], [R-2]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3272/2011III-A

M/S. SAMTEL INDIA LTD. THROUGH ITSCHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTORSATISH K KAURA

KAVITA JHA

VersusADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER., TRADETAX,NOIDA ZONE AND ORS. GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO, [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3273/2011III-A

M/S ELIN ELECTRONICS LTD.U.P.THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR KAVITA JHA

VersusSTATE OF U.P. THROUGHCOMMISSIONER AND ORS. GUNNAM VENKATESWARA RAO, [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 30584/2015XI

J K LAKSHMI CEMENT LTD. GAGRAT AND CO

VersusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER(ASSESSMENT) TRADE TAX . AND ANR. RAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRA

65 C.A. No. 4511/2010IV-A

THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRALEXCISE CUSTOMS, MANGALRE B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusM/S. PURE CHEMICAL LTD. M. P. DEVANATH

ConnectedC.A. No. 569/2012III

COMMR.OF CUSTOMS KANDLA B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusRELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD. K. R. SASIPRABHU

ConnectedC.A. No. 9354/2013XVI

COMMR.OF CUSTOMS KOLKATA B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]

VersusM/S HALDIA PETROCHEMICALS LTD. KHAITAN & CO.[R-1]

66 Crl.A. No. 63/2011II-C

KRISHNAMURTHY SENTHIL JAGADEESANVersus

Page 12: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 6STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE M. YOGESH KANNA

67 C.A. No. 4654/2012III-A

UTTARAKHAND JAL SANSTHAN THR.ITS SECRETARY KAMLENDRA MISHRA[P-1]

Versus

NARESH CHAND ATRI AND ORS.MEHA ASHOK AGGARWAL[R-1], SHWETAGARG[R-2], GUNNAM VENKATESWARARAO[R-3], SAURABH TRIVEDI[R-4]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4655/2012III-A

D.D. DIMRI PARMANAND PANDEY[P-1]

Versus

NARESH CHAND ATRI AND ORS. MEHA ASHOK AGGARWAL[R-1], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-2]

68 C.A. No. 7118/2011XI-A

AKSHYA KUMAR MISHRA MONIKA GUSAINVersusAGRICULTURAL SCIENTISTRECRUITMENT BOARD CHAIRMAN ANDANR.

PRAVEEN SWARUP, [R-2]

69 C.A. No. 7906/2010XV

MAHESH CHAND BARETH AND ANR. RISHI MATOLIYA[P-1], MUKUL KUMAR[P-1],GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1], [P-2]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

FOR ON IA 1/2015 FOR ON IA 2/2015 FOR ON IA 3/2015 FOR ON IA 4/2015 FORON IA 5/2015 and IA No.10227/2018-INTERVENTION APPLICATION

ConnectedC.A. No. 11332/2011XV

SURAJ MAL JAT AND ANR.

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.FOR FOR ON IA 3/2013 FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 87186/2017FOR impleading party ON IA 104886/2017

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 34742/2013XV

KUMARI SARITA AND ORS. AND ORS. PRAVEEN SWARUP

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No.9328-9331/2010XV

BRIJESH KUMAR YADAV AND ORS ANDORS. PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS ANDORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1], SATPAL SINGH[R-23]

and IA No.14889/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.ConnectedC.A. No. 8302/2010XV

DEVI PRASAD AND ORS AND ORS. P. K. JAIN[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. ANDORS. RUCHI KOHLI, MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10281/2010XV

SARLA SHARMA PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.SECRETARY AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.2800-2802/2011XV

ARUNA PAREEK PARUL SHUKLA[P-7]

Versus

Page 13: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 6

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.NIRMAL CHOPRA[R-1], SANDEEP KUMARJHA[R-1], RANBIR SINGH YADAV[R-1], MUKULKUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.2806-2808/2011XV

RAMANAND TANK AND ANR.

Versus

STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2803/2011XV

GOVIND NARAYAN

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.2804-2805/2011XV

KAILASH CHAND SAINI

Versus

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. SANDEEP KUMAR JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.8656-8668/2011XV

RAMESHWAR PRASAD JAT AND ORS.

Versus

STATE OF RAJASTHAN . AND ORS. SUSHIL BALWADA, RUCHI KOHLI

ConnectedC.A. No. 2982/2011XV

DAYANAND KUMAWAT AND ANR. PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2980/2011XV

RAJ KUMARI SHARMA PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2978/2011XV

MANOJ KUMAR SHARMA PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2979/2011XV

ANITA GAUTAM PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2981/2011XV

BHANWAR LAL KAHAR PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2921/2011XV

RAKESH KUMAR GAUTAM PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

Page 14: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No. 2976/2011XV

DILIP KUMAR CHOPDAR PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2977/2011XV

RAJESH KUMAR NAMA PRATIBHA JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN STATE OFRAJASTHAN AND ORS. SECRETARY ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3730/2011XV

MANSUKH RAY SHARMA GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGHCHIEF SECRETARY AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4569/2011XV

MAMTA BANSAL AND ORS. RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. SANDEEP KUMAR JHA[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3732/2011XV

MATADEEN MISHRA GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 5180/2011XV

MADHUSUDAN SHARMA GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 5183/2011XV

GIRDHARI LAL SHARMA AND ORS. GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1], [P-2],[P-3], [P-4], [P-5], [P-6], [P-7], [P-8], [P-9], [P-10]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1].

ConnectedC.A. No. 3731/2011XV

GOVIND SINGH TANWAR GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 5182/2011XV

RUDMAL YADAV AND ORS. GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1], [P-2],[P-3]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 7646/2011XV

HARENDRA SINGH AND ANR. P. K. JAIN[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. PRAGATI NEEKHRA[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 9618/2011XV

BHANA RAM

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10709/2011XV

BABU LAL SHARMA SARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1], RUCHI KOHLI

ConnectedC.A. No. 10712/2011XV

KRISHAN KANT KALAVATIA GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

Versus

Page 15: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 6STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 10711/2011XV

RAM GOPAL SHARMA GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1], RUCHI KOHLI

ConnectedC.A. No. 10710/2011XV

YOGESHWARI GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1], RUCHI KOHLI

ConnectedC.A. No. 6898/2012XV

SURENDRA SINGH NIRWAN P. K. JAIN

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 1668/2012XV

MAHESH CHAND SAINI BANKEY BIHARI SHARMA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 1038/2012XV

JITENDRA SINGH PARMAR AND ORS. PARUL SHUKLA[P-8], [P-9], [P-11], [P-12],[P-13], [P-23], [P-24], [P-25], [P-26]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11442/2011XV

SHIMBUDAYAL SHARMA GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 11407/2011XV

RAMKARAN GURJAR GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 1210/2012XV

BHAGIRATH MAL THALOR GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4559/2012XV

SHYAM SUNDER SHARMA GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. PRAGATI NEEKHRA[R-1], MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.6096-6104/2012XV

GAJENDRA GAUR & ORS.ETC.ETC. ANDANR. AJAY CHOUDHARY

VersusGAJENDRA GAUR .ETC.ETC. AND ORS. MUKUL KUMAR, MILIND KUMAR

ConnectedC.A. No. 8661/2012XV

PRADEEP KUMAR SHARMA AND ORS. PARUL SHUKLA[P-1], [P-2], [P-2]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedSLP(C) No. 34663/2013XV

GHISA RAM MALI AND ORS. AND ORS. PRAVEEN SWARUP[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 322/2013XV

BALDEV SINGH AND ORS. AND ORS. RAKESH DAHIYA[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. ANDORS. MILIND KUMAR[R-1]

Page 16: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 670 C.A. No. 7470/2011

XIIANIL AND SUNIL TRADERS AND ANR. K. K. MANI[P-1]Versus

T.L.PRASAD AND ANR. M. YOGESH KANNA[R-1], M. A.CHINNASAMY[R-1]

71 C.A. No. 6942/2011XIV-A

THE DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNT AND ORS. ANIL KATIYARVersusR.K.KAPOOR RAKESH K. SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No.6943-6949/2011XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTS AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

ANIL KUMAR MEHRA RAKESH K. SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No.6950-6954/2011XIV-A

DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNT AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

CHETAN KUMAR RAJPUT AND ORS. RAKESH K. SHARMA

72 C.A. No. 2477/2012III-A

STATE BANK OF INDIA SANJAY KAPUR[P-1]Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], VIKASSINGH JANGRA[R-4], [R-5], [R-6]ANIL KATIYAR[I-7][IMPL][GR]

ConnectedC.A. No. 2476/2012III-A

STATE BANK OF INDIA SANJAY KAPUR[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS.

TANMAYA AGARWAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], VIKASSINGH JANGRA[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7], [R-8],[R-9], [R-10]

ConnectedC.A. No. 10570/2018III-A

STATE BANK OF INDIA SANJAY KAPUR

VersusSAMARTH NARAIN AND ORS. VIVEK KISHORE[CAVEAT], [R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

73 Crl.A. No. 1755/2011II-A

HARIBHAU @ BHAUSAHEB DINKARKHARUSE AND ANR. K. N. RAI[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SACHIN PATIL[R-1]HEARING EXPEDITED.

ConnectedCrl.A. No.150-151/2013II-A

SUBHASH RAGHUNATH PAWAR K. N. RAI

Versus

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA HOMEDEPARTMENT SECRETARY

74 Crl.A. No. 1241/2011II

MD. YAKUB SHAREEF VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLUVersusTHE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ANDANR.

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 57/2012II

SIDDAM RAJAIAH V. N. RAGHUPATHY

VersusSYED YAKUB PASHA AND ANR. S.. UDAYA KUMAR SAGAR[R-2]

75 C.A. No.8608-8609/2011XIV-A

KRISHAN MURARI AND ORS. SATISH KUMAR, BINAY KUMAR DAS[P-2]

VersusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS

Page 17: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 6

76 C.A. No. 7483/2011XVII-A

GULSHAN KUMAR MENDIRATTA . ANDORS. SAURABH MISHRA

VersusUNION OF INDIA INDIAN RAILWAYSTHROUGH GENERAL MANAGER ANDANR.

B. KRISHNA PRASAD

77 C.A. No. 9851/2014XI-A

CHEMA MALLICK C. V. SUBBA RAO[P-1]Versus

MIR AYUBA ALI AND ORS. S. RAVI SHANKAR[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4],[R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

78 C.A. No. 297/2012XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4],[P-5], [P-6]

VersusSHRI ONKAR SINGH SUNIL KUMAR JAIN

79 C.A. No. 4410/2012XVI

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS[P-1]VersusSURESH KUMAR SINGH NEERAJ SHEKHAR[R-1]

80 C.A. No. 1077/2013XVII-A

M/S. ISNAR AQUA FARMS C. K. RAI[P-1]VersusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. PRAMIT SAXENA[R-1]

81 Crl.A. No. 155/2014II-A

DEO RAI MOHIT KUMAR SHAHVersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR GOPAL SINGH

82 C.A. No. 8634/2012XIV-A

SUSHIL SHARMA DEEPAK GOEL[P-1]VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

83 C.A. No.11302-11303/2016XIV-A

RUPESH KUMAR MEENA S. K. VERMA[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1], B. KRISHNAPRASAD[R-2], PRIYA PURI[R-3]

84 C.A. No. 801/2014XV

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE MILIND KUMAR[P-1]VersusINDRA RAJ SINGH ABHISHEK GUPTA[R-1]

85 Crl.A. No. 457/2012II

GUDIPALLI SIDDHARTHA REDDY G. N. REDDY[P-1]VersusSTATE C.B.I. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA

ConnectedCrl.A. No.894-895/2012II

SAROJINI DEVI P. VINAY KUMAR

Versus

CBI AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA, G. N. REDDY[R-2]

86 C.A. No. 6027/2014XVI

SAMIR KUMAR MAJUMDAR UTTARA BABBAR[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1], PLR CHAMBERSAND CO.[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

87 C.A. No.4788-4790/2012III-A

SANJAY SHARMA AND ORS. SAMIR ALI KHAN[P-1]

Versus

STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS. KAMLENDRA MISHRA[R-1], SHRISH KUMARMISRA[R-2]

88 C.A. No. 4829/2012XVII-A

MILTON ROY INDIA PVT. LTD SHIV KUMAR SURIVersusR.P. RAJARAJAN ENTERPRISES ROHINI MUSA

Page 18: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 689 C.A. No. 6688/2016

III-ASHIV SHANKARLAL SRIVASTAVA MONIKA GUSAIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANDORS. VISHNU SHANKAR JAIN

90 C.A. No. 8242/2013IV-C

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASADVersusVIJENDER PRAKASH GAUTAM VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA

91 C.A. No. 6987/2014XII

R. RAJMOHAN P. SOMA SUNDARAM[P-1][PR]VersusTHE ADDL. CHIEF SEC. TO GOVT. . ANDORS.

92 C.A. No.2525-2526/2013XVII

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. GAURAV SHARMA

VersusVODAFONE ESSAR MOBILE SERVICELTD. NAVIN CHAWLA

93 C.A. No. 2325/2013XVI

LIFE INSURANCE CORP. OF INDIA . ANDORS. ASHOK PANIGRAHI[P-1]

VersusRAJEEV LOHIA AMIT PAWAN[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 6043/2013XI-A

L.I.C.OF INDIA AND ANR. ASHOK PANIGRAHI

VersusSRIKANTA MOHAPATRA AND ANR. PARIJAT SINHA, PUNAM KUMARI

ConnectedC.A. No. 6044/2013XI-A

SR.DIV.MANAGER, LIC OF INDIA . ANDANR. ASHOK PANIGRAHI

VersusTRIPATI PANDA SIBO SANKAR MISHRA

ConnectedC.A. No. 4860/2017XI-A

VINCEN MATHEW V. SHYAMOHAN

VersusLIFE INSUREANCE CORPORATION OFINDIA AND ORS. ASHOK PANIGRAHI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

Ready as per Ld. Registrar Order dt.19.11.2018.94 C.A. No. 2066/2014

IVSATISH KUMAR AND ANR. RAVI PANWAR[P-1]VersusSTATE OF HARYANA . AND ORS. MONIKA GUSAIN[R-1]LIST AFTER FOUR WEEKS.

95 C.A. No. 5459/2013XVII-A

ASSAM BROOK LTD ABHIJEET SINHAVersusUNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTDAND ANR. RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA[R-1], [R-2]

96 Crl.A. No. 223/2014II-B

PATEL DANABHAI KANABHAI AND ANR. AMBAR QAMARUDDIN[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[R-1]

97 Crl.A. No.1338-1339/2015II-B

PARAMJIT SINGH KANG LAW ASSOCIATES

VersusGURWINDER SINGH SAMRA AND ORS. ANURADHA MUTATKAR, , [R-3]

ConnectedCrl.A. No.1341-1342/2015II-B

STATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA[P-1]

Versus

DR. GURWINDER SINGH SAMRA ANDANR. BALRAJ DEWAN[R-2]

Page 19: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 698 Crl.A. No. 2013/2014

II-BBALWINDER SINGH AND ANR. AJAY PAL[P-1], [P-2]VersusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB UTTARA BABBAR[R-1]

99 C.A. No. 305/2014III

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(IMPORT) B. KRISHNA PRASAD[P-1]VersusM/S. EDWARD LIFE SCIENCES(I)PVT.LTD. THROUGH ITS MANAGINGDIRECTOR

SONAL JAIN[R-1]

100 C.A. No. 13703/2015IV-A

DIAGEO PLC AND ANR. MAREZBAN P. BHARUCHA[P-1]Versus

BNP PARIBAS AND ORS.

DUA ASSOCIATES[R-1], B. VIJAYALAKSHMIMENON[R-1], RAJINDER NARAIN & CO.[R-1]MEERA MATHUR[IMPL], E. C.AGRAWALA[R-1], [IMPL]PETITIONER-IN-PERSON[INT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 13704/2015IV-A

UNITED BREWERIES (HOLDINGS) LTD ANAND SUKUMAR[P-1]

Versus

BNP PARIBAS AND ANR. MAREZBAN P. BHARUCHA[R-4], [R-5]E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1], [IMPL]

FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 62563/2020

ConnectedC.A. No. 13714/2015IV-A

UNITED BREWERIES (HOLDINGS) LTD E. C. AGRAWALA, [IMPL], ANANDSUKUMAR[P-1]

VersusROLLS ROYCE & PARTNERS FINANCELTD PRITHA SRIKUMAR

FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 62549/2020

ConnectedC.A. No. 13715/2015IV-A

UNITED BREWERIES (HOLDINGS) LTD E. C. AGRAWALA, [IMPL], ANANDSUKUMAR[P-1]

VersusIAE INTERNATIONAL AERO ENGINESAGFOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 62584/2020

ConnectedC.A. No. 13713/2015IV-A

UNITED BREWERIES (HOLDINGS) LTD ANAND SUKUMAR[P-1]

Versus

RRPF ENGINE LEASING LTD PRITHA SRIKUMAR[R-1]E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1], [IMPL]

FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 62539/2020

ConnectedC.A. No. 13716/2015IV-A

UNITED BREWERIES (HOLDINGS) LTD E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1], [IMPL], ANANDSUKUMAR[P-1]

VersusAVIONS DE TRANSPORT REGIONAL GIE RAJINDER NARAIN & CO.[R-1]FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 62572/2020

ConnectedC.A. No. 13717/2015IV-A

UNITED BREWERIES (HOLDINGS) LTD E. C. AGRAWALA[P-1], [IMPL], ANANDSUKUMAR[P-1]

Versus

SBI AND ORS.

VIVEK A. VASHI[R-1], VIPIN KUMAR JAI[R-1],SANJAY KAPUR[R-1], PALLAV MONGIA[R-1], N.L. GANAPATHI[R-1], KUSH CHATURVEDI[R-1],KAVITA JHA[R-1], DIVYAM AGARWAL[R-1], B.VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON[R-1], ANNAM D. N.RAO[R-1], RAJINDER NARAIN & CO.[R-1],KAUSHIK PODDAR[R-4], MAREZBAN P.BHARUCHA[R-19], [R-20], SOM RAJCHOUDHURY[R-27], RAHUL GUPTA[R-32]

FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 62576/2020

Page 20: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No. 13712/2015IV-A

UNITED BREWERIES (HOLDINGS) LTD E. C. AGRAWALA, [IMPL], ANANDSUKUMAR[P-1]

VersusBNP PARIBAS B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENONFOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 62554/2020

ConnectedC.A. No. 13720/2015IV-A

DIAGEO PLC AND ANR. MAREZBAN P. BHARUCHA[P-1]

Versus

IAE INTERNATIONAL AERO ENGINESAG AND ORS. MEERA MATHUR[IMPL], E. C.

AGRAWALA[IMPL]FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 62643/2020

ConnectedC.A. No. 13719/2015IV-A

DIAGEO PLC AND ANR. MAREZBAN P. BHARUCHA[P-1]

Versus

RRPF ENGINE LEASING LTD. AND ANR.PRITHA SRIKUMAR[R-1], E. C.AGRAWALA[R-1], DUA ASSOCIATES[R-1],RAJINDER NARAIN & CO.[R-1]MEERA MATHUR[IMPL]

FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 62640/2020ConnectedC.A. No. 13721/2015IV-A

DIAGEO PLC AND ANR. MAREZBAN P. BHARUCHA[P-1]

Versus

ROLLS ROYCE & PARTNERS FINANCELTD. &ANR AND ORS.

PRITHA SRIKUMAR[R-1]MEERA MATHUR[IMPL], E. C.AGRAWALA[IMPL]

FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 62647/2020ConnectedC.A. No. 13722/2015IV-A

DIAGEO PLC AND ANR. MAREZBAN P. BHARUCHA[P-1]

Versus

AVIONS DE TRANSPORT REGIONAL GIEAND ORS.

E. C. AGRAWALA[R-1], [IMPL], RAJINDERNARAIN & CO.[R-1]MEERA MATHUR[IMPL]

FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 62650/2020ConnectedC.A. No. 13718/2015IV-A

DIAGEO PLC AND ORS. MAREZBAN P. BHARUCHA[P-1]

Versus

STATE BANK OF INDIA . AND ORS.

SANJAY KAPUR[R-1], DUA ASSOCIATES[R-2],LIZ MATHEW[R-20], DIVYAM AGARWAL[R-22],PALLAV MONGIA[R-24], N. L.GANAPATHI[R-25], RAHUL GUPTA[R-28],[R-28], KUSH CHATURVEDI[R-30], ANNAM D.N. RAO[R-32]MEERA MATHUR[IMPL], E. C.AGRAWALA[IMPL]

FOR INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 62636/2020ConnectedC.A. No. 13723/2015IV-A

S.B.I AND ORS. SANJAY KAPUR[P-1]

Versus

UNITED BREWERIES (HOLDINGS) LTDAND ORS.

VIVEK A. VASHI[R-1], PALLAV MONGIA[R-1],LIZ MATHEW[R-1], KUSH CHATURVEDI[R-1],KAVITA JHA[R-1], DIVYAM AGARWAL[R-1],ABHISHEK AGARWAL[R-1], N. L.GANAPATHI[R-8], MAREZBAN P.BHARUCHA[R-8], RAHUL GUPTA[R-20]E. C. AGRAWALA[IMPL]

FOR FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 171850/2019 FORINTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT ON IA 62653/2020

101 C.A. No. 9686/2014XII

UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSIONREP. BY ITS SECRETARY BINU TAMTA

VersusM. MAHALAKSHMI

Page 21: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 6

102 C.A. No.5655-5656/2014XIV-A

MAHENDRA SINGH RAVINDRA BANA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR. GHANSHYAM JOSHI[CAVEAT]

103 C.A. No. 8967/2014XIV-A

INDIAN FOREIGNSERVICE(B)GAZETTED OFFICERSASSOCIATION AND ANR.

ABHA R. SHARMA

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], [R-3]

104 C.A. No.8629-8630/2014XIV-A

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. B. KRISHNA PRASAD

VersusJOGESHWAR SWAIN KEDAR NATH TRIPATHY[R-1]

105 C.A. No. 7758/2014III-A

STATE OF U.P AND ORS. ANKIT GOEL[P-1], [P-2], [P-3]VersusYOGESH CHANDRA GAUTAM AND ANR. SUSHIL BALWADA[R-1]

106 C.A. No. 9084/2017XVII-A

HINDUSTAN COCA-COLA BEVERAGESPVT.LTD. RAJIV TYAGI

VersusPURUSHOTTAM GAUR AND ANR. ANDANR.

107 C.A. No. 6641/2015XVI

U.O.I.. AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR[P-1]VersusASIT KUMAR DAS VIPIN KUMAR JAI[CAVEAT], SARLA CHANDRA

108 C.A. No. 631/2016III

ATUL S/O ARVIND CHIVHE AND ORS. SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI[P-1]Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSURE, [R-8],SHREEKANT N. TERDAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4], [R-5], [R-6], [R-7]

ConnectedC.A. No. 634/2016III

SAMBHAJI VISHNUPANT KOLI . ANDORS. SUDHANSHU S. CHOUDHARI

VersusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITSSECRETARY . AND ORS. NISHANT RAMAKANTRAO KATNESHWARKAR

109 C.A. No. 7107/2014XV

J.S. PARMAR PRATIBHA JAINVersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. D. S. MAHRA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5]

110 C.A. No. 4269/2018XVII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. SUSHMA SURI[P-1]VersusRAM CHANDER PANDEY PANKAJ KUMAR[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No.4270-4271/2018XVII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. AND ORS. ANIL KATIYAR

Versus

SAILENDRA SINGH YASH PAL DHINGRAFOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 1/2016

111 Crl.A. No. 437/2015II-C

ANEES V. MAHESHWARI & CO.[P-1]VersusTHE STATE GOVT OF NCT B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]

112 C.A. No. 8744/2015XII

CHAIRMAN, CHENNAI PORT TRUSTAND ANR. SUSMITA LAL

VersusA KANNABIRAN VINODH KANNA B.

113 C.A. No. 4200/2015III-A

THE STATE OF UP AND ORS. SANJAY KUMAR TYAGI[P-1]Versus

Page 22: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 6NEERAJ CHAUBEY AND ORS. K.PARAMESHWAR[R-1][ IMMEDIATELY AFTER FRESH MATTERS ]

114 Crl.A. No. 921/2015II-C

DARSHAN KUMAR SUNIL FERNANDES[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]VersusTHE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SAMIR ALI KHAN[R-1][GR]FOR FINAL DISPOSAL VIDE ORDER DATED 07.07.2020.

115 C.A. No.13999-14000/2015XII

KAILASH BEN T. SOLANGI AND ETCAND ANR. M. A. CHINNASAMY

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. REP. BYTHE GOVERNMENT OF PUDUCHERRYAND ORS.

V. G. PRAGASAM, BINU TAMTA

116 C.A. No. 21854/2017III

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. KAUSHIK PODDAR[P-1]Versus

DR. S.J. KAMBLE AND ORS.VENKATESWARA RAO ANUMOLU[R-1], B.KRISHNA PRASAD[R-2], DUAASSOCIATES[R-3], [R-5]

117 Crl.A. No. 1421/2015II-C

NAND LAL AND ORS. VIKAS UPADHYAY[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1422/2015II-C

PALTAN JANGDE VIKAS UPADHYAY[P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1470/2017II-C

CHARANDAS JANGDE . AND ORS. JAIL PETITION[P-1]

VersusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH SUMEER SODHI[R-1][GR]Mr. Shailendra Tiwary, Adv, Amicus Curiae

ConnectedSLP(Crl) No.6134-6135/2019II-C

TULSI JANGDE AND ORS. RENJITH. B[P-1][AMICUS CURIAE]

Versus

THE STATE OF CHHATTISGARHFOR ADMISSION

118 C.A. No.5622-5623/2015XII

S. NANDHIVARMAN GAURAV AGRAWAL[P-1]

Versus

J. KUMARAN AND ORS. ETC. AND ORS. V. G. PRAGASAM[R-1], GAUTAMNARAYAN[R-4], [R-4], K. V. VIJAYAKUMAR[R-6]

119 T.C.(C) No. 78/2015XVI-A

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD. ANIRUDDHA P. MAYEE[P-1]Versus

SURAJ SINGH AND ORS. AND ORS.

LIZ MATHEW[R-3], AMITA SINGHKALKAL[R-1], [R-2], [R-5], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9],[R-12], [R-13], [R-15], [R-20], [R-21], [R-24],[R-29], [R-33], [R-35], [R-39], [R-40], [R-42],[R-44]

120 Crl.A. No. 1007/2017II-B

MANJINDER KAUR ALIAS BHOLI SANJAY JAINVersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 1006/2017II-B

RACHHPAL SINGH SANJAY JAIN

VersusSTATE OF PUNJAB JASPREET GOGIA

121 C.A. No. 15140/2017XVI

KISHORE KUMAR RAI MUSHTAQ AHMAD[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1], [R-2]

Page 23: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No. 15141/2017XVI

DIN BANDHU PATHAK AND ANR. KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. THESECRETARY AND ORS. ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 675/2015X

AMRENDRA KUMAR THAKUR MUSHTAQ AHMAD

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1]

ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 665/2015X

HARI SHANKAR PRASAD SINGH KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH

VersusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 15142/2017XVI

SUDHIR CHANDRA PATHAK AND ORS. KUMAR DUSHYANT SINGH

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORSTHROUGH ROAD CONSTRUCTIONDEPARTMENT AND ORS.

ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 15143/2017XVI

BRIJANANDAN SINGH AND ORS. MUSHTAQ AHMAD

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARYAND ORS.

ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3]

ConnectedC.A. No. 15144/2017XVI

BIPIN KUMAR SINHA AND ANR. SMARHAR SINGH, [P-1]

VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR STATE OF BIHARAND ORS. THR. PRINCIPAL SECRETARYAND ORS.

ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4]

and IA No.92089/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.122 Crl.A. No. 1619/2015

II-AASHOK SARAF AND ORS. KUNAL VERMAVersusSANTOSHI MISHRA AND ORS. VIKAS UPADHYAY

123 Crl.A. No. 1158/2016II-C

LOKESH VISHNU SHARMAVersusSTATE(NCT OF DELHI) B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1]

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 2065/2017II-C

RAJEEV @ BOBBY B. SRIDHAR

VersusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1]FOR FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA125948/2017

ConnectedCrl.A. No. 402/2018II-C

PREM SHANKER RAMESHWAR PRASAD GOYAL

VersusTHE STATE OF DELHIIA FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA30183/2018

124 C.A. No. 2680/2016IV-A

C.G. SUPRASANNA RASHMI NANDAKUMARVersusUNION OF INDIA . AND ORS. HRISHIKESH BARUAH

125 C.A. No. 3583/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusRAJU SINGH AND ORS. AND ORS. DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA[R-8]

Page 24: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No. 3584/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusRAJENDRA PRASAD NAPIT

ConnectedC.A. No. 4613/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS.

MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7], [P-8], [P-9], [P-10]

Versus

PRABHU SINGH AND ORS. AND ORS.GP. CAPT. KARAN SINGH BHATI[R-1], [R-2],[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], SHALU SHARMA[R-6],[R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-13], [R-14], [R-15], [R-16]

ConnectedC.A. No. 3585/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusSANJAY KUMAR SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No. 4615/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5]

VersusNARESH SURANA

ConnectedC.A. No. 3588/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusRAVINDRA MATHUR

ConnectedC.A. No. 3586/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusSATYA NARAYAN SHARMA

ConnectedC.A. No. 4614/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS.

MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7], [P-8], [P-9], [P-10]

VersusBABU LAL PRAJAPAT AND ORS. ANDORS. SHALU SHARMA, [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-7], [R-8]

ConnectedC.A. No. 4617/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS.

MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7]

VersusPRATAP RAM AND ORS. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4619/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusMAHENDRA PAL

ConnectedC.A. No. 4618/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORSAND ORS.

MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7], [P-8]

VersusPADAM SINGH AND ORS AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4621/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusBHAGIRATH SINGH AND ORS. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4461/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusSHYAM LAL AND ANR. AND ANR.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4462/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusTULCHA RAM SINGARIA

Page 25: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No. 4616/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5]

VersusHEENA JOSHI AND ORS. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4463/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.AND ANR. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2]

VersusPREETAM SINGH AND ORS. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4620/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS.

MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7]

VersusANAND PATEL AND ORS. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4623/2016XV

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. ANDORS.

MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4], [P-5],[P-6], [P-7], [P-8]

VersusMANEESH SAINI AND ORS. AND ORS.

ConnectedC.A. No. 4624/2016XV

THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.AND ORS. MILIND KUMAR[P-1], [P-2], [P-3], [P-4]

VersusOM PRAKASH SHARMA

126 C.A. No.8859-8860/2016XI-A

DIRECTOR GENERAL, ALL INDIA RADIO ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[P-1]

Versus

PURUSHOTHAMAN C. AND ORS. ETC.ETC. AND ORS.

SHREE PAL SINGH[R-1], P. SOMASUNDARAM[R-1], BIJAN KUMAR GHOSH[R-1],NISHE RAJEN SHONKER[R-29], [R-30], [R-31],[R-32], [R-33], [R-34], [R-35], [R-36], [R-37],[R-38], [R-39], [R-40], [R-41], [R-42], [R-43],[R-44], [R-45], [R-46], [R-47], [R-48], [R-49],[R-50], [R-51]YADAV NARENDER SINGH[IMPL], VIVEKSHARMA[IMPL], RAVI PANWAR[IMPL],MUKESH KUMAR SINGH AND CO.[IMPL],DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINHA[IMPL]

ONLY I.A. NO.15054 OF 2019 (APPLICATION FOR EARLY HEARING) IN C.A.NO.8859-8860 OF 2016 TO BE LISTED.

ConnectedDiary No. 22646-2018XVI-A

PRASAR BHARTI BROADCASTINGCORPORATION OF INDIA AND ORS.

GURMEET SINGH MAKKER[P-1], [P-2], [P-3],[P-4], [P-5]

VersusSHAFEEQ AHMAD SOFI AND ORS.IA No.92636/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.92638/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT

127 C.A. No. 4071/2016XIV-A

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD ANDORS. RAHUL KAUSHIK

VersusSUBHASH CHAND GUPTA RANI CHHABRA

128 C.A. No. 8212/2016XVII-A

M/S. RAUNAQ ICE AND COLD STORAGE M. A. CHINNASAMYVersusNEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. . ANDANR. VARINDER KUMAR SHARMA

129 C.A. No.12174-12176/2018XVII-A

FARMERS SERVICE COOP.SOCIETY LTD.(COMMON IN ALL MATTERS) SRIDHAR POTARAJU

VersusAGRICULTURE INSURANCE CO OFINDIA FORMERLY KNOWN AS GENERALINSURANCE COOPERATION OF INDIA(FORMERLY

TUHIN, GUNTUR PRABHAKAR

Page 26: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 6ConnectedC.A. No.12177-12187/2018XVII-A

MANAGER, AGRICULTURE SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. ETC. ETC. PRAKASH RANJAN NAYAK

Versus

AGRICULTURE INSURANCE COMPANYOF INDIA LTD. . AND ORS.

RANJAN KUMAR PANDEY[R-1], V. N.RAGHUPATHY[R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6],[R-7], [R-8]

130 C.A. No. 7121/2016XVII-A

DENA BANK ANISHA UPADHYAYVersusMAHARASHTRA TOURISMDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANYKARANJAWALA & CO.[INT]

ConnectedC.A. No. 20878/2017XVII-A

MAHARASHTRA TOURISMDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANY

VersusDENA BANK ANISHA UPADHYAY[R-1]

ConnectedC.A. No. 7157/2016XVII-A

DENA BANK ANISHA UPADHYAY

VersusMUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGIONDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANYYASHRAJ SINGH DEORA[INT]

ConnectedDiary No. 16863-2017XVII-A

MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGIONDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY S.M. JADHAV AND COMPANY

VersusDENA BANK ANISHA UPADHYAY[R-1]

131 Crl.A. No.2017-2019/2017II-A

JAI PRAKASH KUNWAR SHISHIR PINAKI[P-1]

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. SANTOSH KUMAR - I[R-1], FAUZIASHAKIL[R-3]

132 Crl.A. No. 1846/2017II

RAJ KUMAR YADAV VIPIN KUMAR JAIVersus

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH ANUVRAT SHARMA[R-1], AMIT PAWAN[R-2],[R-3], [R-4], [R-5], [R-6]

133 Crl.A. No. 17/2017II-A

PRAMOD TIWARY AND ANR. SHANTANU SAGAR[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF BIHAR ABHINAV MUKERJI[R-1]

134 C.A. No.4722-4723/2017XI-A

TAPAN KUMAR BARIK ANKUR SOOD[P-1]

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. MUKESH KUMAR MARORIA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3],[R-4], KIRAN KUMAR PATRA[R-5]

135 C.A. No. 1080/2017III-A

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESHTHROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARYAND ANR.

ROHIT K. SINGH[P-1], [P-2]

Versus

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA AND ORS. S. K. VERMA[R-1], [R-2], [R-3], [R-4], [R-5],[R-6], [R-7], [R-8], [R-9], [R-10], [R-11]

136 C.A. No. 20841/2017III-A

PRATHAMA BANK AND ORS. ALDANISH REINVersusVED PRAKASH CHAUHAN ANIL K. CHOPRA

137 C.A. No. 5697/2017XVII

COAL INDIA LIMITED S. S. SHROFF[P-1]VersusCOMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIAAND ANR AND ANR.

RISHAD AHMED CHOWDHURY[R-1], HIRENDASAN[R-2]

LIST FOR FINAL DISPOSAL VIDE COURT'S ORDER DATED 18.02.2019138 C.A. No. 13120/2017

XVIIRAVINDER CHNANA AND ORS. PRAVEEN JAIN, DEVVRAT[P-2]Versus

Page 27: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

COURT NO. : 6

DELHI SECRETARIAT AND ORS.

B. V. BALARAM DAS[R-1], [R-4], D. N.GOBURDHAN[R-5], AVIJIT ROY[R-6], GURMEETSINGH MAKKER[R-7], PREMPRAKASH[CAVEAT], [R-9], KAMLENDRAMISHRA[R-10], PRAVEEN SWARUP[R-2],YOGINDER HANDOO[R-3]SANJAY KUMAR VISEN[INT]

{Fixed Date by Court for 23-02-2021 } RELEASED FROM PART-HEARD

139 C.A. No.2827-2829/2018XII

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA[P-1][GR]

Versus

ROHIT NATHAN AND ANR.HARSH PARASHAR[R-1]VIKRAM HEGDE[INT][PR], SIDDHARTHAJHA[INT], PRATEEK K CHADHA[R-1], [INT],HIMA LAWRENCE[INT][PR]

[ TOP OF THE BOARD ]......[RETAIN ITS POSITION]ConnectedW.P.(C) No. 381/2020X

RAJESH KUMAR YADAV DEEPAK GOEL

VersusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.FOR ADMISSION

ConnectedSLP(C) No.6723-6734/2020XIV

UNION OF INDIA ARVIND KUMAR SHARMA

Versus

KETAN AND ORS.HIMA LAWRENCE[CAVEAT], VIKRAMHEGDE[R-1]PARMANAND GAUR[IMPL]

FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.41362/2020-CONDONATION OF DELAY INFILING and IA No.41365/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNEDJUDGMENT and IA No.41364/2020-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONALDOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES

140 C.A. No. 1942/2019III-A

HARIDAS VERMA K. N. RAIVersusCOMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT OFDISTRICT COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.AND ANR.

AAKARSH KAMRA[R-1], SUNNYCHOUDHARY[R-2]

141 Crl.A. No. 1263/2018II

ANIL KUMAR PRIYANJALI SINGH[P-1]VersusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH SARVESH SINGH BAGHEL[R-1]FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.57100/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.

142 C.A. No. 3001/2020XVII-A

M/S ANUJ TEXTILES AND ANR. BIJOY KUMAR JAINVersusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ANDORS. CHANDER SHEKHAR ASHRI[CAVEAT]

{Fixed Date by Court for 23-02-2021 } [IN THE MONTH OF FEB 2021 ]FORADMISSION and IA No.82536/2020-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION

NOTE:-ON 24.02.2021 & 25.02.2021 , LEFT OVER MATTERS OF 23.02.2021AND MATTERS SHOWN IN THE WEEKLY LIST WILL BE TAKEN UP BYTHE BENCH PRESIDED OVER BY HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.Y.CHANDRACHUD.

NEW DELHI18-02-2021 18:28:49

Page 28: IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES - … · 2021. 2. 18. · kovilan[r-2][pr], [r-3][pr], [r-4][pr], [r-5][pr], [r-6][pr], [r-7][pr] 2 crl.a. no. 1041/2007 ii-c shivaraj

ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR