9
IT Benchmarking 21.06.2011 Dr. Andreas Maaser

IT Benchmarking

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: IT Benchmarking

IT Benchmarking

21.06.2011

Dr. Andreas Maaser

Page 2: IT Benchmarking

1Dr. Andreas Maaser in confidence

01 Company profile

02 Telefònica Germany - IT outsourcing

03 Key performance indicators

04 Benchmarking

05 Working group IT Benchmarking

06 First results; next steps

Page 3: IT Benchmarking

Telefónica Germany is part of Telefónica S.A., one of the biggest internationally operating telecommunications

companies in the world.

2Dr. Andreas Maaser in confidence

Mobile Telecommunication

Mobile Internet

Internet access

Fixed network telephony

Virtual Private Networks, security and

hosting

Broadband wholesale

Portfolio

More than 20 million customers, 17,03 m mobile customers and more than 2,6 m DSL

customers

More than 1,1 million broadband connections (ULL) through partners

Revenue in Q1/2011: 1,23 billion Euros

Network coverage : 99% Mobile voice, 95% DSL and fixed network telephony, 98%

Mobile Data, LTE next-generation mobile technology

01

Facts &

Figures

1995 – Foundation of VIAG Interkom

(as a joint venture between VIAG AG,

British Telecommunications &Telenor)

2002 – VIAG Interkom becomes o2

Germany

2006 – o2 becomes part of the Telefónica

group

2011 – Integration HanseNet; Telefónica

o2 Germany becomes Telefónica

Germany; LTE Roll-out

History

Page 4: IT Benchmarking

3Dr. Andreas Maaser in confidence

02 Telefónica Germanyhas experience in successful IT outsourcing for several years.

Produc-tion

Quality Ass.

DevelopmentPlanning & Capacity Management

PlanningE2E

AnalysisAnalysis

Coding

& CT

Integration

E2E TestLaunch

offshore:

60%

onsite:

40%

internal

&

external

offshore:

80%

onsite:

20%

internal&

external

Sh

are

ofo

ffsh

ore

activitie

s

0

25

50

75

100%

2011201020092008

Page 5: IT Benchmarking

4

03 Key performance indicatorswere used to manage and compare the different vendors.

Dr. Andreas Maaser in confidence

DefinitionKPI

Cost Onshore/Offshore Ratio

On-/Offshore MDs/ Total MDs

Average Dayrate Total Cost/ MDs

other

KPIsGovernance Effort

Internal MDs/ Deliveryvolume

ScalabilityAvailability of

resources

Ratio Cost E2E Test -Development

Cost E2E Test/ CostDevelopment

Co

ntr

ac

ted

KP

Is

Quality Defect Density MDs/ Defects

Defect Ratio Production/E2E

Production Defects/ E2E Defects

Service Level Agreement

Reaction Time/ Resolution Time

Productivity Function Point Analysis

Function Points / PM

MD = Mandays

PM = Person Month

Page 6: IT Benchmarking

After transition new vendor

exceeded expectations

Company internal benchmark

difficult due to different

technologies, methodologies,

scope, etc.

5Dr. Andreas Maaser in confidence

04 Benchmarkingreasons for benchmarking on operational level.

IT outsourcing

start transition

time

pro

gre

ss

Available IT Benchmarks on the market:

• too generic or high level

• doesn´t reflect different methodologies, technologies, etc.

• definition of metrics can be misinterpreted

• definition cannot be adapted on specific conditions

• no option to get in touch with other benchmarking participants

Page 7: IT Benchmarking

Working group IT Benchmarkingwas initiated together with European Outsourcing Association

Germany e.V.

6Dr. Andreas Maaser in confidence

comparison of outsourcing services on an operational level

projects with different parameters and methodologies of

software development (e.g. Waterfall, Scrum)

• companies with offshore IT development

• “users-only” benchmarking working group

• regular workshops

• definition of commonly accepted metrics of benchmarking

parameters to ensure comparability

• discussion of results (current metrics: defect density &

test effort)

• confidence – based on NDA

05

Target

Approach

Members

Scope

Page 8: IT Benchmarking

7

Working group IT Benchmarkingfirst comparable results and the exchange of experiences give clear

indications about success factors in outsourcing.

06

Benchmarking metrics which

are in place and have been

compared:

• Test Effort

• Defect Density

splitted for different

technologies & methodologies

Next steps:

• Definition and comparison of

Productivity

• Scope enhancement

regarding other metrics

• expansion of working group

to widen data base

EOA Germany

• Dr. Jörg Stimmer

([email protected])

• Prof. Dr. Wolfgang

Fritzemeyer

(wolfgang.fritzemeyer@bake

rnet.com)

Telefónica Germany

• Dr. Andreas Maaser

([email protected])

First results Contact

Dr. Andreas Maaser in confidence

Page 9: IT Benchmarking