Upload
paul-underwood
View
227
Download
8
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ISOVECTOR EXCITATIONS OF sd-SHELL NUCLEI IN THE PARTICLE-CORE COUPLING
VERSION OF SHELL MODEL
N.G. GoncharovaSkobelzyn Institute of Nuclear Physics,
Moscow State University
Beyond particle-hole doorway basis
• Expanded basis →
,2 2
2
( );
( ..).
ph p h ph phononV V F
f C
int 2 2 ,2 2 ....ph p h ph p hV V V V
Particle Core Coupling Shell Model
, ,
( , ) ( , , )i f
JT f f JT i i f JT i i fi j j
F q J T O J T j O i j C f J j T
'
'
'
' '
( ),,
( ),
( ), ',
( ),
1
1
( ' ' ') ( ) : ,
( ' ' ') ( ' ' ') : ,
J ji i i
J j
J jf f f
J j
i iA
A f f
J T C
J T
J E T nlj J T
J E T n l j J T
2 ,ii
i
SC
S Connection with direct
reaction spectroscopy
Form factors of Electroexcitation
Nuclear photo- and electroexcitation
1ħ resonances in sd-shell nuclei: E1, M2, E3, M4, E5,M6
max 2 212 2 2
1
, ( ) 2 1J
el magT EJ MJ i f J i f J i
J
F q F F J J T J J T J
( ) .J
J J JB j qr Y
Spin currents contributions to MR
Orbital currents contributions to MR
1 1 1 1, .mag elJ J J J J J J JT A A B T A B B
( ) , J
J J JA j qr Y
E1 resonances at photopoint in 22Ne
Exp: V.V.Varlamov, M.E.Stepanov, BRAS Physics 64 (2000) №3
σ, mb
E, MeV
10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
Dynamic deformations in 27Al photodisintegration
• 27Al+γ → 26Al+n 27Al+γ → 26Mg+p
H. Röpke, P.M.Endt // Nucl. Phys.A632(1998)173.
Spin- and orbital currents interference in E1 1p shell form factors
At q~0.5÷0.6 Fm-1
FE1(p3/2-1d5/2) ~0 /HOWF/
1( ) 0EF q
Interference of spin- and orbital currents contributions into MR
• Exp:E1 in 12C(e,e’) / Mainz,MAMI A,1988/: Calc. PCCSM
Nuclear Orbital M2 CurrentOrbital M2 TWIST Mode: Orbital current has oppositesignes in the upper and lower semispheres.The current vanishes at
Z=0
2
2, 2 2
2 Ji
Mag j i j
eT j qr
q
(e,e’) excitation ~Spin +orbital(twist) modes
(p,p’) excitations –SPIN part onlyComparison of (e,e’) and (p,p’) reveals ORBITAL TWIST M2-
ORBITAL (TWIST) M2 MODE in the transitions from sd-shell
1d5/2-1f7/2
-0,05
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5
q, Fm-1
TM2
A1+A3
B2
M2
1d3/2-1f5/2
-0,05
0
0,05
0,1
0,15
0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5
q, Fm-1
TM2
A1+A3
B2
M2
1 1
M2 in 32S
Experiment: S-DALINAC 1997 (Emax=14 MeV)
E, MeV
F2 105
8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00
0.000.501.001.502.002.50
S-320.7 g free
8.00 12.00 16.00 20.00
0.0
4.0
8.0
12.0
16.0
S-32F2 106
q = 0.6 fm-1
M6 stretched states in sd shell
• Spin current contributions only:
1 1
1
1 11
.
( 6 )
1{ ( .
2 2 1
magJM J J J
magJM J
A JM
j J i J i ji
T A A B
T M A
iq Jj qr
M J
M6 in sd-shell nuclei : 28Si
E, MeV
2
102
F2 102 q = 1.8 Fm-1
S.Yen, T.E.Drake et al., Phys.Lett.B289, 22(1992)
M6 in sd-shell nuclei : 32S
Exp.: Clausen B.L et al , Phys.Rev.C48, 1632(1993).
PCCSM, NG,Phys.At.Nucl.(2009)#10
Summary
• The deviation of (A) nucleus from closed shells or subshells reveals in a wide range of energy distribution for ”hole” among the (A-1) nuclei states. In the PCC version of SM these distributions are taken into account in microscopic description of multipole resonances using spectroscopy of pick-up reactions.
• The energy spread of final nuclei states is the main origin of the multipole resonances fragmentation in open shell nuclei. Comparison of PCC SM results with experimental data on MR confirms the validity of this approach for a range of momentum transfer from “photopoint” up to q≈2 Fm-1.
• The assumption that some very valuable information on MR in excited deformed nucleus is embedded in direct reactions spectroscopy data proved to be right.