Upload
vohanh
View
228
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
International Summer School "Natural Disasters"
Ljubljana, 21th May – 10th June 2017
ISO 22327: Guidelines for implementation
of a community-based Landslide EWS
Teuku Faisal Fathani
Universitas Gadjah Mada, IndonesiaIndonesian Standardization Agency (BSN)Indonesian National Disaster Management Authority
Background (Sendai Framework of Action), objectives, users
Existing Guideline/Standard on Landslide EWS
Basic concept: Socio-technical integration
4 key-element by UN-ISDR (2006) and ISO 22327: 7 Sub-systems of Landslide EWS
Implementation of Landslide EWS
Outline
3
Landslide susceptibility map
American Geophysical Union (AGU) (2009)
Background It is difficult to relocate community (peoples) living in landslide
vulnerable area. The most effective DRR effort is to improve
the community’s preparedness by implementing EWS.
Warning system which mainly emphasize on technical
approach mostly does not work properly due to lack of
community awareness with result in poor maintainance and
operation.
Improve community preparedness and willingness to protect
themselves from landslide disasters.
Integration of technical and social system is required to support
the community empowerment program for DRR in landslide
vulnerable area.
Background (cont.)
EWS implementation in the world is in line with the 2015-2030
Sendai Framework for Action with four (4) priorities in DRR :
“The improvement of preparedness
in order to respond effectively to a
disaster, by implementing a simple,
low-cost EWS and improving the
dissemination of information about
EWS of natural disasters at local and
national levels.”
Referring to the four key elements of community-based EWS (UN-
ISDR, 2006), therefore it is necessary to develop a standardization
for landslide EWS
1. Understand disaster risk
2. Strengthen disaster risk
governance to manage
disaster risk
3. Invest in DRR for resilience
4. Invest in disaster
preparedness to enhance
response
Objectives Establishing an International Standard for the implementation of
landslide EWS, by Integrating technical and social networks
Reducing risk from landslide disasters by increasing the
community awareness – preparedness - resilience
Community empowerment with respect to community-based
disaster risk reduction in landslide vulnerable area
Users International organization/institution
Central and local government authority
Private sectors, NGOs
Local community
Existing Guideline/Standard on EWS
Source: Rex L. Baum and Jonathan W. Godt “Early warning of rainfall-induced shallow landslides and debris
flows in the USA” Landlslides © Springer Verlag 2009
Existing Guideline/Standard on EWS (cont.)
Network of Capacity Development
Existing Guideline/Standard on EWS (cont.)
ISO 22327: Landslide Early Warning System
SECTION CONTENT
Scope Specifies the requirement for a landslide
early warning system
Abbreviations, definitions
and terms
For the purpose of the document,
definition of terms/abbrevation are needed
Seven sub-systems of
landslide early warning
system
Specifies all parts of the landslide sub-
systems in detail
Appendices (Informative) Appendices as explanation for the
guidelines
7 Sub-systems of Landslide EWS
Landslide EWS
Risk Assessment
Dissemination and
communication
Establishment of disaster
preparedness organization
Development of evacuation
map and route
Development of Standard Operating
Procedures
Monitoring & warning devices
Evacuation drill
Commitment in operation
and maintenance
4 key element for community-
based EWS (UN-ISDR, 2006)
Concept of Hybrid Socio-Technical System
Risk Assessment• Technical survey on geological
conditions to determine landslide
susceptibility and stable zones.
• Institutional survey to understand
whether an established institution
exist to monitor and mitigate
landslide hazards in the disaster-
prone areas.
• Social survey to understand the
community’s understanding of
landslide hazards.
15
Landslide hazard mapping by the community
Dissemination• Methods and materials of the
dissemination are tailored based
on the preliminary data of the risk
assessments
• The community could understand
the landslide mechanisms,
symptoms, and how to minimize
risks
• Identifying the key people who
have a strong commitment as
forerunners in the establishment of
disaster preparedness team.
17
Establishment of disaster preparedness and
response team In charge of determining landslide risk zones and evacuation routes
and mobilizing people to evacuate before the landslide occur.
Responsible for operating and maintaining monitoring tools
Development of evacuation routes and maps
The evacuation map should provide the information on: • High-risk and low-risk (safe) zones;
• Residences, including the estimation of the number of residence
in each;
• Community facilities: school, place of worship, community health
centre, offices, market and landmarks;
• Streets and alleys;
• Locations of early warning system installation point;
• Alert post;
• Assembly Point(s);
• Evacuation route(s);
• Location of shelters.
Maps need to be made simply so that it is easier to
understand by the local community.
Description:
1. Title indicating the location of theLEWS implementation;
2. Logo of the local authorities or otherrelevant stakeholders
3. Evacuation map and routes;
4. Legend and important information(landmarks) including common signseasily recognizable;
5. Name of the heads of the families.
NOTE: The evacuation map does notneed to include the scale, but only thenorth direction that can be placed in thelegend. The north direction may not faceup, depending on the local customs.
5
1 2
3 4
Development of Standard Operating Procedure
The SOP contains the procedures for responses by the
disaster preparedness team and the community to the alert
issued by the landslide early warning instrument.
The SOP was prepared based on the discussions and
agreements of each division under the direction of relevant
stakeholders to follow the flow of warning information delivery
mechanism and evacuation commands.
LEVEL 1: CAUTIONTriggered by rain gauge sensor. The disaster experts should determine
the critical limit for rainfall intensity that may trigger landslide in mm/hour
or mm/day. If the critical limit is exceeded, then the device will give
CAUTION warning.
LEVEL 2: WARNING Triggered by tiltmeter. Disaster experts should determine the critical limit
of soil movement in degree (°)/minute or per hour, in the X-Y direction (N-
S and W-E). If the instrument indicates slope inclination change that
exceeds the critical limit, it will trigger the WARNING warning mechanism.
Vulnerable groups should be evacuated first.
LEVEL 3: EVACUATE Triggered by extensometer. This device has critical limit in mm/minutes or
mm/hour, depending on the field condition determined by the disaster
experts. If the movement exceeds the critical limit, the device will trigger
the EVACUATE warning mechanism.
Level of warning
Status/alert
level
Criteria/ sign Action/response by the
community
Action by the
local authority
Caution
(Level 1)
Criteria:
determined by
rainfall
measurement
Sign: “Yellow”
lamps and/or siren
that sounds
"caution, high
rainfall" or other
sound signs that
show the lowest
threat level or alert
level or depending
on the local
conditions
The team leader
coordinates with the
Disaster Preparedness
Team.
The data and information
division checks the
condition of the monitoring
equipment and collects
data of the community, and
informs the alert level and
encourages preparing
essential items to bring.
The Disaster Response
Team provides periodic
reports to the team leader.
Receives
report from
the disaster
preparedness
team leader
Checks the
condition in
the field and
maintains
coordination
with the
disaster
preparedness
team
Level 1: Caution
Status/al
ert level
Criteria/ sign Action/response by the community Action by the
local authority
Warning
(Level 2)
Criteria: determined
by increased rainfall
or slope hydrology,
and landslide
indications
Sign: "orange" lamps
and siren that sounds
"warning, evacuation"
or other sound signs
that show the
increase of threat
level to siaga/warning
or depending on the
local conditions
The team leader coordinates with the
Disaster Preparedness Team.
The data and information division re-
checks the condition of landslide and
the monitoring equipment, and
collects data of the community
The team leader gives the vulnerable
group an order to evacuate to the
assembly point, with the help of the
refugee mobilization division and the
security division.
The data section collects data of the
vulnerable group in order to ensure
that they have been evacuated.
The security division is in charge of
ensuring the security of the residents’
homes and the environment.
Receives
report from
the disaster
preparedness
team leader
Checks the
condition in
the field and
maintains
coordination
with the
disaster
preparedness
team
Provides
support to the
evacuated
vulnerable
group
Level 2: Warning
Status/alert
level
Criteria/ sign Action/response by the
community
Action by the local
authority
Evacuate
(Level 3)
Criteria: determined
by increased rainfall
or slope hydrology,
and rate of landslide
Sign: "red" lamps
and siren that sounds
"evacuate" or other
sound signs that
show the highest
threat level or
depending on the
local conditions
The team leader
coordinates with the
Disaster Preparedness
Team.
The team leader gives
all residents an order to
evacuate to the
assembly point, with
the help of the refugee
mobilization division
and the security
division.
The data and
information section
checks the early
detection equipment
and collects data of the
residents in the refugee
camp.
Receives report
from the disaster
preparedness
team leader
Checks the
condition in the
field and maintains
coordination with
the disaster
preparedness
team
Provides
emergency
support to the
evacuated
residents
Level 3: Evacuate
Monitoring, Early Warning, and Evacuation Drill
• Determination of the locations is based on the identification of
landslide risk zones. Installation of the equipment is done with
the community, aiming to increase the sense of ownership and
responsibility for the equipment’s condition to guarantee safety.
Installation of Landslide
Monitoring and Early Warning
System
Evacuation Drill Process
Desa Kalitlaga, Kec. Pagentan Kab. Banjarnegara
Example of the scheme of
a community-based LEWS
Commitment of the local government and
community on the O&M of the systems
The commitment of the local government and the community
is crucial in the operation and maintenance of the early
warning system, so that all activity stages included in the
SOP run well.
The duty and responsibility in terms of ownership,
installation, operation, maintenance, and security of an early
warning system are adjusted to the condition in each location
and are agreed upon by the government, the community, and
the private sector.
Legend:
UGM in cooperation with BNPB, BPBD and KPDT BNPB & UGM 2015
UGM in cooperation with Private Mining Company BNPB & UGM 2016
UGM in cooperation with Pertamina Geothermal Energy (2013) BNPB & UGM 2017
UGM in cooperation with International Consortium on Landslides (ICL-UNESCO)
Myanmar
(2012)
Landslide EWS installation (2007-2017) in Indonesia
34
How the technical system works?
First version landslide early warning technology
(2007-2008)
Patent: IDP000038351Patent: IDP000038434
Extensometer and Tiltmeter with data logger (2009)
Patent: IDP000038787
Installation of Monitoring Devices
Extensometer
Patent: IDP000039806
Installation of Monitoring Devices
Patent: IDP000038968
Installation of Monitoring Devices
Repeater
Interface for real-time landslide monitoring data
on PC/web
Local server for data acquisition and data logger
and ReceiverWireless Tiltmeterand its controller
Automatic Rainfall Recorder (ARR) PC-based
monitoring
FIE
LD
SE
NS
OR
S Sirene and Rotary Light as warning devices
Control Room
Landslide EWS
Wireless Extensometer
Wireless Extensometer
Online Landslide Monitoring – National Oil and Gas Company of Indonesia
Landslide
Venerability Map
Extensometer Graph (10 minutes record)
Extensometer Graph (daily record)
Tiltmeter Graph (daily record)
X - direction
Y - directionWater-level
Rain Graph
Warning Criteria
Warning I (First Warning, Yellow)
R24>100 && R24 > 250-R72
Warning II (Prepare for evacuation, Orange)
( R24 > 150 && R24> 350-R72 ) ||
( Warning I && ( e1 > 2mm/hour or e2 > 2mm/hour ) )
Warning III (Evacuation, Red)
If ( Warning I || Warning II ) && ( e1 > 5mm/hour || e2
>5mm/hour )
72 hours anticedent rainfall R72mm
24 hours anticedent rainfall R24mm
Extensometer 1 displacement e1 mm/hour
Extensometer 2 displacement e2 mm/hour
Design of Preventive Measures
References
1. ISO 22315, Societal security – Mass evacuation – Guidelines for planning
2. ISO 22320, Societal security − Emergency management − Guidelines for incident response
3. ISO 22322, Societal security – Emergency management − Guidelines for public warning
4. ISO 7001, 2007, Graphical symbols –public information symbols
5. ISO 31000, 2009, Risk management-principles and guidelines
6. ISO/TR 22351, Emergency management − Message structure for exchange of information
7. Cruden, D.M. and Varnes, D.J. (1996) Landslide types and processes, in: Landslide: Investigation and
mitigation, Transportation Research Board, USA, p. 36 -75.
8. Fathani, T. F., Karnawati, D., Wilopo, W. (2016) An integrated methodology to develop a standard for
landslide early warning system, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 16, p.2123-2135.
9. Fathani, T. F., Karnawati, D., and Wilopo, W. (2014) An adaptive and sustained landslide monitoring and
early warning system. In: Sassa K, Canuti P, Yin Y (eds) Landslide Science for a Safer Geoenvironment
Vol 2, Springer International Publishing, p.563-567.
10. Karnawati, D., Maarif, S., Fathani, T.F., Wilopo, W., (2013) Development of Socio-Technical Approach for
Landslide Mitigation and Risk Reduction Program in Indonesia, ASEAN Engineering Journal Part C Vol.2
No.1, p.22-49.
11. Karnawati, D., Fathani, T.F., Wilopo, W., Setianto, A., Andayani, B. (2013) Hybrid Socio-Technical
Approach for Landslide risk reduction in Indonesia, in Progress of Geo-disaster Mitigation Technology in
Asia, Environmental Science and Engineering, Springer Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, p.157-169.
12. Karnawati, D., Wilopo, W., Andayani, B. (2010) Development of Community Hazard Map for Landslide
Risk Reduction, Proc. of the 11th International Association of Engineering Geologist Congress,
Auckland, New Zealand, 5-10 September 2010.
13. UN-ISDR: Developing an early warning system: a checklist, The Third International Conference on Early
Warning III. Bonn, German