ISDS 3115 Ch.3

  • Upload
    crings1

  • View
    223

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    1/69

    3 - 1 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    3Project

    Management

    PowerPoint presentati

    on to accompanyPowerPoint presentation to accompany

    Heizer and RenderHeizer and Render

    Operations Management, 10eOperations Management, 10e

    Principles of Operations Management, 8ePrinciples of Operations Management, 8e

    PowerPoint slides by Jeff Heyl

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    2/69

    3 - 2 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Single unit

    Many related activities

    Difficult production planning andinventory control

    General purpose equipment

    High labor skills

    Project CharacteristicsProject Characteristics

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    3/69

    3 - 3 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Management of ProjectsManagement of Projects

    1. Planning - goal setting, defining theproject, team organization

    2. Scheduling - relates people, money,and supplies to specific activitiesand activities to each other

    3. Controlling - monitors resources,

    costs, quality, and budgets; revisesplans and shifts resources to meettime and cost demands

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    4/69

    3 - 4 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Project Planning,Project Planning,

    Scheduling, and ControllingScheduling, and Controlling

    Figure 3.1

    Before Start of project During

    project Timeline project

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    5/69

    3 - 5 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Project Planning,Project Planning,

    Scheduling, and ControllingScheduling, and Controlling

    Figure 3.1

    Before Start of project During

    project Timeline project

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    6/69

    3 - 6 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Project Planning,Project Planning,

    Scheduling, and ControllingScheduling, and Controlling

    Figure 3.1

    Before Start of project During

    project Timeline project

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    7/693 - 7 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Project Planning,Project Planning,

    Scheduling, and ControllingScheduling, and Controlling

    Figure 3.1

    Before Start of project During

    project Timeline project

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    8/69

    3 - 8 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Project Planning,Project Planning,

    Scheduling, and ControllingScheduling, and Controlling

    Figure 3.1

    Before Start of project During

    project Timeline project

    Budgets

    Delayed activities reportSlack activities report

    Time/cost estimates

    Budgets

    Engineering diagrams

    Cash flow charts

    Material availability details

    CPM/PERT

    Gantt charts

    Milestone charts

    Cash flow schedules

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    9/69

    3 - 9 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Project Organization

    Often temporary structure

    Uses specialists from entire company

    Headed by project manager

    Matrix Organization

    Types of ProjectTypes of ProjectOrganizationsOrganizations

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    10/69

    3 - 10 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    The Role ofThe Role of

    the Project Managerthe Project ManagerHighly visibleHighly visibleResponsible for making sure that:Responsible for making sure that:

    1. All necessary activities are finished in orderand on time

    2. The project comes in within budget

    3. The project meets quality goals

    4. The people assigned to the project receivemotivation, direction, and information

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    11/69

    3 - 11 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    The Role ofThe Role of

    the Project Managerthe Project ManagerHighly visibleHighly visibleResponsible for making sure that:Responsible for making sure that:

    1. All necessary activities are finished in orderand on time

    2. The project comes in within budget

    3. The project meets quality goals

    4. The people assigned to the project receivemotivation, direction, and information

    Project managers should be:

    Good coaches

    Good communicators

    Able to organize activities

    from a variety of disciplines

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    12/69

    3 - 12 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Ethical IssuesEthical Issues

    1. Offers of gifts from contractors

    2. Pressure to alter status reports to mask delays

    3. False reports for charges of time and expenses

    4. Pressure to compromise quality to meetschedules

    Project managers face many ethicaldecisions on a daily basis

    The Project Management Institute has

    established an ethical code to deal withproblems such as:

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    13/69

    3 - 13 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Work Breakdown StructureWork Breakdown Structure

    Level

    1. Project

    2. Major tasks in the project

    3. Subtasks in the major tasks

    4. Activities (or work packages)to be completed

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    14/69

    3 - 14 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Level 4Compatible with

    Windows ME

    Compatible withWindows Vista

    Compatible withWindows XP 1.1.2.3

    1.1.2.2

    1.1.2.1

    (Work packages)

    Level 3Develop

    GUIsPlanning

    ModuleTesting

    Ensure Compatibilitywith Earlier Versions

    Cost/ScheduleManagement

    DefectTesting

    1.1.1

    1.2.2 1.3.2

    1.3.11.2.1

    1.1.2

    Work Breakdown StructureWork Breakdown Structure

    Figure 3.3

    Level 2SoftwareDesign

    ProjectManagement

    SystemTesting1.1 1.2 1.3

    Level 1

    Develop Windows 7

    Operating System 1.0

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    15/69

    3 - 15 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Project SchedulingProject Scheduling

    Identifying precedencerelationships

    Sequencing activities

    Determining activitytimes & costs

    Estimating material &

    worker requirements Determining critical

    activities

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    16/69

    3 - 16 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Gantt chart

    Critical Path Method(CPM)

    Program Evaluationand Review

    Technique (PERT)

    Project ManagementProject ManagementTechniquesTechniques

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    17/69

    3 - 17 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    A Simple Gantt ChartA Simple Gantt Chart

    TimeJ F M A M J J A S

    Design

    Prototype

    Test

    Revise

    Production

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    18/69

    3 - 18 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Service For a Delta JetService For a Delta Jet

    Figure 3.4

    Passengers

    Baggage

    Fueling

    Cargo and mail

    Galley servicingLavatory servicingDrinking water

    Cabin cleaning

    Cargo and mail

    Flight servicesOperating crew

    Baggage

    Passengers

    DeplaningBaggage claim

    Container offload

    Pumping

    Engine injection water

    Container offload

    Main cabin door

    Aft cabin doorAft, center, forward

    Loading

    First-class section

    Economy section

    Container/bulk loading

    Galley/cabin check

    Receive passengersAircraft check

    Loading

    Boarding

    0 10 20 30 40Time, Minutes

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    19/69

    3 - 19 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Network techniques

    Developed in 1950s

    CPM by DuPont for chemical plants (1957)

    PERT by Booz, Allen & Hamilton with theU.S. Navy, for Polaris missile (1958)

    Consider precedence relationships andinterdependencies

    Each uses a different estimate ofactivity times

    PERT and CPMPERT and CPM

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    20/69

    3 - 20 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Six Steps PERT & CPMSix Steps PERT & CPM

    1. Define the project and prepare thework breakdown structure

    2. Develop relationships among theactivities - decide which activitiesmust precede and which mustfollow others

    3. Draw the network connecting all ofthe activities

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    21/69

    3 - 21 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Six Steps PERT & CPMSix Steps PERT & CPM

    4. Assign time and/or cost estimatesto each activity

    5. Compute the longest time paththrough the network this is calledthe critical path

    6. Use the network to help plan,schedule, monitor, and control theproject

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    22/69

    3 - 22 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    1. When will the entire project becompleted?

    2. What are the critical activities or tasks inthe project?

    3. Which are the noncritical activities?

    4. What is the probability the project will becompleted by a specific date?

    Questions PERT & CPMQuestions PERT & CPM

    Can AnswerCan Answer

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    23/69

    3 - 23 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    5. Is the project on schedule, behindschedule, or ahead of schedule?

    6. Is the money spent equal to, less than, orgreater than the budget?

    7. Are there enough resources available tofinish the project on time?

    8. If the project must be finished in a shortertime, what is the way to accomplish thisat least cost?

    Questions PERT & CPMQuestions PERT & CPM

    Can AnswerCan Answer

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    24/69

    3 - 24 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    A Comparison of AON andA Comparison of AON andAOA Network ConventionsAOA Network Conventions

    Activity on Activity Activity onNode (AON) Meaning Arrow (AOA)

    A comes before

    B, which comesbefore C.(a) A B C BA C

    A and B must bothbe completedbefore C can start.

    (b)

    A

    C

    CB

    A

    B

    B and C cannotbegin until A iscompleted.

    (c)

    B

    A

    C

    AB

    CFigure 3.5

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    25/69

    3 - 25 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    A Comparison of AON andA Comparison of AON andAOA Network ConventionsAOA Network Conventions

    Activity on Activity Activity onNode (AON) Meaning Arrow (AOA)

    C and D cannot

    begin until bothA and B arecompleted.

    (d)A

    B

    C

    D B

    A C

    D

    C cannot beginuntil both A and Bare completed; Dcannot begin untilB is completed. Adummy activity isintroduced in AOA.

    (e)CA

    B D

    Dummy activity

    A

    B

    C

    D

    Figure 3.5

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    26/69

    3 - 26 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    A Comparison of AON andA Comparison of AON andAOA Network ConventionsAOA Network Conventions

    Activity on Activity Activity onNode (AON) Meaning Arrow (AOA)

    B and C cannotbegin until A iscompleted. Dcannot beginuntil both B andC are completed.A dummyactivity is againintroduced inAOA.

    (f)

    A

    C

    DB A B

    C

    D

    Dummy

    activity

    Figure 3.5

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    27/69

    3 - 27 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    AON ExampleAON Example

    Activity Description ImmediatePredecessors

    A Build internal components

    B Modify roof and floor C Construct collection stack A

    D Pour concrete and install frame A, B

    E Build high-temperature burner C

    F Install pollution control system C

    G Install air pollution device D, E

    H Inspect and test F, G

    Milwaukee Paper Manufacturing'sMilwaukee Paper Manufacturing'sActivities and PredecessorsActivities and Predecessors

    Table 3.1

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    28/69

    3 - 28 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    AON Network forAON Network for

    Milwaukee PaperMilwaukee Paper

    A

    Start

    BStartActivity

    Activity A

    (Build Internal Components)

    Activity B(Modify Roof and Floor)

    Figure 3.6

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    29/69

    3 - 29 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    AON Network forAON Network for

    Milwaukee PaperMilwaukee Paper

    Arrows Show PrecedenceRelationships Figure 3.8

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    30/69

    3 - 30 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Determining the ProjectDetermining the ProjectScheduleSchedule

    Perform a Critical Path AnalysisPerform a Critical Path Analysis

    The critical path is the longest path

    through the network The critical path is the shortest time in

    which the project can be completed

    Any delay in critical path activitiesdelays the project

    Critical path activities have no slacktime

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    31/69

    3 - 31 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Determining the ProjectDetermining the ProjectScheduleSchedule

    Perform a Critical Path AnalysisPerform a Critical Path Analysis

    Table 3.2

    Activity Description Time (weeks)

    A Build internal components 2

    B Modify roof and floor 3

    C Construct collection stack 2

    D Pour concrete and install frame 4

    E Build high-temperature burner 4

    F Install pollution control system 3G Install air pollution device 5

    H Inspect and test 2

    Total Time (weeks) 25

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    32/69

    3 - 32 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Determining the ProjectDetermining the ProjectScheduleSchedule

    Perform a Critical Path AnalysisPerform a Critical Path Analysis

    Table 3.2

    Activity Description Time (weeks)

    A Build internal components 2

    B Modify roof and floor 3

    C Construct collection stack 2

    D Pour concrete and install frame 4

    E Build high-temperature burner 4F Install pollution control system 3

    G Install air pollution device 5

    H Inspect and test 2

    Total Time (weeks) 25

    Earliest start (ES) = earliest time atwhich an activity can start, assumingall predecessors have been completed

    Earliest finish (EF) = earliest time atwhich an activity can be finished

    Latest start (LS) = latest time atwhich an activity can start so as to notdelay the completion time of the entireproject

    Latest finish (LF) = latest time bywhich an activity has to be finished soas to not delay the completion time of

    the entire project

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    33/69

    3 - 33 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Determining the ProjectDetermining the ProjectScheduleSchedule

    Perform a Critical Path AnalysisPerform a Critical Path Analysis

    Figure 3.10

    A

    Activity Nameor Symbol

    EarliestStart

    ESEarliestFinishEF

    LatestStart

    LS LatestFinish

    LF

    Activity Duration

    2

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    34/69

    3 - 34 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Forward PassForward Pass

    Begin at starting event and work forwardBegin at starting event and work forward

    Earliest Start Time Rule:

    If an activity has only a single immediatepredecessor, its ES equals the EF of thepredecessor

    If an activity has multiple immediatepredecessors, its ES is the maximum ofall the EF values of its predecessors

    ES = Max {EF of all immediate predecessors}

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    35/69

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    36/69

    3 - 36 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    ES/EF Network forES/EF Network for

    Milwaukee PaperMilwaukee PaperA

    2

    2

    EF of A =ES of A + 2

    0

    ESof A

    EF = ES + Activity time

    ES = Max {EF of all immediate predecessors}

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    37/69

    3 - 37 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Backward PassBackward Pass

    Begin with the last event and work backwardsBegin with the last event and work backwards

    Latest Finish Time Rule:

    If an activity is an immediate predecessorfor just a single activity, its LF equals theLS of the activity that immediately followsit

    If an activity is an immediate predecessorto more than one activity, its LF is theminimum of all LS values of all activitiesthat immediately follow it

    LF = Min {LS of all immediate following activities}

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    38/69

    3 - 38 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Backward PassBackward Pass

    Begin with the last event and work backwardsBegin with the last event and work backwards

    Latest Start Time Rule:

    The latest start time (LS) of an activity isthe difference of its latest finish time (LF)and its activity time

    LS = LF Activity time

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    39/69

    3 - 39 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Computing Slack TimeComputing Slack Time

    After computing the ES, EF, LS, and LF timesfor all activities, compute the slack or freetime for each activity

    Slack is the length of time an activity canbe delayed without delaying the entireproject

    Slack = LS ES or Slack = LF EF

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    40/69

    3 - 40 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Critical Path forCritical Path for

    Milwaukee PaperMilwaukee Paper

    E

    4

    F

    3

    G

    5

    H

    2

    4 8 13 15

    4

    8 13

    7

    13 15

    10 13

    8 13

    4 8

    D

    4

    3 7

    C

    2

    2 4

    B

    3

    0 3

    Start

    0

    0

    0

    A

    2

    20

    42

    84

    20

    41

    00

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    41/69

    3 - 41 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    ES EF Gantt ChartES EF Gantt Chartfor Milwaukee Paperfor Milwaukee Paper

    A Build internalcomponents

    B Modify roof and floor

    C Construct collectionstack

    D Pour concrete andinstall frame

    E Build high-temperature burner

    F Install pollutioncontrol system

    G Install air pollutiondevice

    H Inspect and test

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    42/69

    3 - 42 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    LS LF Gantt ChartLS LF Gantt Chartfor Milwaukee Paperfor Milwaukee Paper

    A Build internalcomponents

    B Modify roof and floor

    C Construct collectionstack

    D Pour concrete andinstall frame

    E Build high-temperature burner

    F Install pollutioncontrol system

    G Install air pollutiondevice

    H Inspect and test

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    43/69

    3 - 43 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    CPM assumes we know a fixed timeestimate for each activity and there

    is no variability in activity times PERT uses a probability distribution

    for activity times to allow forvariability

    Variability in Activity TimesVariability in Activity Times

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    44/69

    3 - 44 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Three time estimates are required

    Optimistic time (a) if everything

    goes according to plan Pessimistic time (b) assuming very

    unfavorable conditions

    Most likely time (m) most realisticestimate

    Variability in Activity TimesVariability in Activity Times

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    45/69

    3 - 45 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Estimate follows beta distributionEstimate follows beta distribution

    Variability in Activity TimesVariability in Activity Times

    Expected time:

    Variance of times:t = (a + 4m + b)/6

    v= [(b a)/6]2

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    46/69

    3 - 46 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Estimate follows beta distributionEstimate follows beta distribution

    Variability in Activity TimesVariability in Activity Times

    Expected time:Expected time:

    Variance of times:Variance of times:t =t = ((a +a + 44mm ++ bb)/6)/6

    v =v = [([(bb aa)/6]2)/6]2Probabilityof 1 in 100 of> b occurring

    Probability of1 in 100 of< a occurring

    Pro

    ba

    bilit

    y

    OptimisticTime (a)

    Most LikelyTime (m)

    PessimisticTime (b)

    ActivityTime

    Figure 3.12

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    47/69

    3 - 47 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Computing VarianceComputing Variance

    Table 3.4

    Most ExpectedOptimistic Likely Pessimistic Time Variance

    Activity a m b t = (a + 4m + b)/6 [(b a)/6]2

    A 1 2 3 2 .11

    B 2 3 4 3 .11C 1 2 3 2 .11D 2 4 6 4 .44E 1 4 7 4 1.00

    F 1 2 9 3 1.78G 3 4 11 5 1.78H 1 2 3 2 .11

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    48/69

    3 - 48 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Probability of ProjectProbability of ProjectCompletionCompletion

    Project variance is computed byProject variance is computed bysumming the variances of criticalsumming the variances of criticalactivitiesactivities

    2 = Project variance= (variances of activities

    on critical path)

    p

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    49/69

    3 - 49 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Probability of ProjectProbability of ProjectCompletionCompletion

    Project variance is computed byProject variance is computed bysumming the variances of criticalsumming the variances of criticalactivitiesactivitiesProject variance

    2 = .11 + .11 + 1.00 + 1.78 + .11 = 3.11

    Project standard deviation

    p = Project variance= 3.11 = 1.76 weeks

    p

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    50/69

    3 - 50 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Probability of ProjectProbability of ProjectCompletionCompletion

    PERT makes two more assumptions:PERT makes two more assumptions:

    Total project completion times follow anormal probability distribution

    Activity times are statisticallyindependent

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    51/69

    3 - 51 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Probability of ProjectProbability of ProjectCompletionCompletion

    Standard deviation = 1.76 weeks

    15 Weeks

    (Expected Completion Time)Figure 3.13

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    52/69

    3 - 52 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Probability of ProjectProbability of ProjectCompletionCompletion

    What is the probability this project canWhat is the probability this project canbe completed on or before the 16 weekbe completed on or before the 16 weekdeadline?deadline?

    Z= / p= (16 wks 15 wks)/1.76

    = 0.57

    due expected datedate of completion

    Where Zis the number ofstandard deviations the duedate or target date lies fromthe mean or expected date

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    53/69

    3 - 53 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Probability of ProjectProbability of ProjectCompletionCompletion

    What is the probability this project canWhat is the probability this project canbe completed on or before the 16 weekbe completed on or before the 16 weekdeadline?deadline?

    Z = / p= (16 wks 15 wks)/1.76

    = 0.57

    due expected datedate of completion

    Where Zis the number ofstandard deviations the duedate or target date lies fromthe mean or expected date

    .00 .01 .07 .08

    .1 .50000 .50399 .52790 .53188

    .2 .53983 .54380 .56749 .57142

    .5 .69146 .69497 .71566 .71904

    .6 .72575 .72907 .74857 .75175

    From Appendix I

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    54/69

    3 - 54 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Probability of ProjectProbability of ProjectCompletionCompletion

    Time

    Probability(T 16 weeks)

    is 71.57%

    Figure 3.14

    0.57 Standard deviations

    15 16Weeks Weeks

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    55/69

    3 - 55 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Determining ProjectDetermining ProjectCompletion TimeCompletion Time

    Probabilityof 0.01

    Z

    Figure 3.15

    From Appendix I

    Probabilityof 0.99

    2.33 Standarddeviations

    0 2.33

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    56/69

    3 - 56 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Variability of CompletionVariability of Completion

    Time for Noncritical PathsTime for Noncritical Paths Variability of times for activities

    on noncritical paths must be

    considered when finding theprobability of finishing in aspecified time

    Variation in noncritical activitymay cause change in critical path

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    57/69

    3 - 57 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Trade-Offs and ProjectTrade-Offs and Project

    CrashingCrashing

    The project is behind schedule The completion time has been

    moved forward

    It is not uncommon to face theIt is not uncommon to face thefollowing situations:following situations:

    Shortening the duration of theproject is called project crashing

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    58/69

    3 - 58 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Factors to Consider WhenFactors to Consider When

    Crashing a ProjectCrashing a Project The amount by which an activity is

    crashed is, in fact, permissible

    Taken together, the shortenedactivity durations will enable us tofinish the project by the due date

    The total cost of crashing is assmall as possible

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    59/69

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    60/69

    3 - 60 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Steps in Project CrashingSteps in Project Crashing

    3. If there is only one critical path, thenselect the activity on this critical paththat (a) can still be crashed, and (b) hasthe smallest crash cost per period. If

    there is more than one critical path, thenselect one activity from each critical pathsuch that (a) each selected activity canstill be crashed, and (b) the total crash

    cost of all selected activities is thesmallest. Note that the same activity maybe common to more than one criticalpath.

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    61/69

    3 - 61 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Steps in Project CrashingSteps in Project Crashing

    4. Update all activity times. If the desireddue date has been reached, stop. If not,return to Step 2.

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    62/69

    3 - 62 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Crashing The ProjectCrashing The Project

    Table 3.5

    Time (Wks) Cost ($)Crash Cost Critical

    Activity Normal Crash Normal Crash Per Wk ($) Path?

    A 2 1 22,000 22,750 750 Yes

    B 3 1 30,000 34,000 2,000 NoC 2 1 26,000 27,000 1,000 YesD 4 2 48,000 49,000 1,000 NoE 4 2 56,000 58,000 1,000 YesF 3 2 30,000 30,500 500 NoG 5 2 80,000 84,500 1,500 YesH 2 1 16,000 19,000 3,000 Yes

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    63/69

    3 - 63 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Crash and Normal TimesCrash and Normal Timesand Costs for Activity Band Costs for Activity B

    | | |1 2 3 Time (Weeks)

    $34,000

    $33,000

    $32,000

    $31,000

    $30,000

    ActivityCost

    Crash

    Normal

    Crash Time Normal Time

    CrashCost

    NormalCost

    Crash Cost/Wk =Crash Cost Normal CostNormal Time Crash Time

    = $34,000 $30,0003 1

    = = $2,000/Wk$4,0002 Wks

    Figure 3.16

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    64/69

    3 - 64 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Critical Path and Slack TimesCritical Path and Slack Timesfor Milwaukee Paperfor Milwaukee Paper

    Figure 3.17

    E

    4

    F

    3

    G

    5

    H

    2

    4 8 13 15

    4

    8 13

    7

    13 15

    10 13

    8 13

    4 8

    D

    4

    3 7

    C

    2

    2 4

    B

    3

    0 3

    Start

    0

    0

    0

    A

    2

    20

    42

    84

    20

    41

    00

    Slack = 1 Slack = 1

    Slack = 0 Slack = 6

    Slack = 0

    Slack = 0

    Slack = 0

    Slack = 0

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    65/69

    3 - 65 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Advantages of PERT/CPMAdvantages of PERT/CPM

    1. Especially useful when scheduling andcontrolling large projects

    2. Straightforward concept and not

    mathematically complex3. Graphical networks help highlight

    relationships among project activities

    4. Critical path and slack time analyses help

    pinpoint activities that need to be closelywatched

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    66/69

    3 - 66 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Advantages of PERT/CPMAdvantages of PERT/CPM

    5. Project documentation and graphicspoint out who is responsible for variousactivities

    6. Applicable to a wide variety of projects7. Useful in monitoring not only schedules

    but costs as well

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    67/69

    3 - 67 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    1. Project activities have to be clearlydefined, independent, and stable in theirrelationships

    2. Precedence relationships must bespecified and networked together

    3. Time estimates tend to be subjective andare subject to fudging by managers

    4. There is an inherent danger of too muchemphasis being placed on the longest, orcritical, path

    Limitations of PERT/CPMLimitations of PERT/CPM

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    68/69

    3 - 68 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall

    Project Management SoftwareProject Management Software

    There are several popular packagesfor managing projects

    Primavera

    MacProject

    Pertmaster

    VisiSchedule

    Time Line Microsoft Project

  • 8/6/2019 ISDS 3115 Ch.3

    69/69