Upload
trinhlien
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1 © ISCC System GmbH: For personal use only. Reproduction and distribution is prohibited.
ISCC Technical Committee South East Asia Jakarta, 12 August 2015 Experience with different technological measures for methane reduction and methane avoidance and their impact on GHG emissions – Introduction Jakarta, 12 August 2015 ISCC System GmbH Hohenzollernring 72 D-50672 Köln www.iscc-system.org [email protected]
2 © ISCC System GmbH: For personal use only. Reproduction and distribution is prohibited.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
PME (with methane capture at oil mill) PME (process not specified)
56% GHG savings
19% GHG savings
The EU RED only provides two GHG default values for PME, one with methane capture at oil mill, one without methane capture % GHG savings
PME (with methane capture at oil mill)
PME (process not specified)
3 © ISCC System GmbH: For personal use only. Reproduction and distribution is prohibited.
14 14
18
49 5
5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Palm oil biodiesel (process with methane capture at oil mill)
Palm oil biodiesel (process not specified)
transport, distribution
processing
cultivation
37 g CO2eq/MJ PME
68 g CO2eq/MJ PME
Processing emissions have the highest impact on overall GHG emissions of PME* g CO2eq/ MJ
PME (with methane capture at oil mill)
PME (process not specified)
* Disaggregated default values from RED
4 © ISCC System GmbH: For personal use only. Reproduction and distribution is prohibited.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Oil mill (without methane capture)
Oil mill (with methane capture)
Refinery Biodiesel plant
From the different processing units in a PME supply chain, the oil mill can have the highest impact on process specific emissions*
0 kg CO2e/t crude palm oil
37.9 kg CO2e/t refined palm oil
622.9 kg CO2e/t PME
Oil mill Refinery Biodiesel
plant
* Allocated results, based on EU RED, Biograce
1070.6 kg CO2e/t crude palm oil
CH
4 fro
m P
OM
E
5 © ISCC System GmbH: For personal use only. Reproduction and distribution is prohibited.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Oil mill (without methane capture)
Oil mill (with methane capture)
Refinery Biodiesel plant 0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Oil mill (without methane capture)
Oil mill (with methane capture)
Refinery Biodiesel plant
The two defaults from the EU RED for PME assume two different treatments of the Palm oil mill effluent (POME) at the oil mill
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Oil mill (without methane capture)
Oil mill (with methane capture)
Refinery Biodiesel plant
0 kg CO2e/t product
CH
4 fro
m P
OM
E tr
eatm
ent
Default value “PME (process with methane capture at oil mill)”:
Assumes biogas plant at oil mill and thus zero net emissions at oil mill
Default value “PME (process not specified)”: Worst case is assumed, i.e. open ponds with standing water conditions lead to anaerobic
digestions and thus high CH4 emissions
6 © ISCC System GmbH: For personal use only. Reproduction and distribution is prohibited.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Oil mill (without methane capture)
Oil mill (with methane capture)
Refinery Biodiesel plant 0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Oil mill (without methane capture)
Oil mill (with methane capture)
Refinery Biodiesel plant
Between the default values, many more attractive options to reduce GHG emissions exist. The problem is that GHG emission values are not available
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Oil mill (without methane capture)
Oil mill (with methane capture)
Refinery Biodiesel plant
0 kg CO2e/t product
1070.6 kg CO2e/t product
CH
4 fro
m P
OM
E tr
eatm
ent
Ventilation
Algae Co-composting
Closed ponds and flaring off
è Within ISCC, options can be integrated. Different options and specific GHG data must be evaluated
Solid separation
7 © ISCC System GmbH: For personal use only. Reproduction and distribution is prohibited.
Actual emission measurements for the methane reduction options required to set up a RED compatible GHG calculation framework