Upload
ibrahim-salem
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
1/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 1
IS 800:2007 Section 8Design of members
subjected to bending
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
2/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 2
SECTION 8 DESIGN OF MEMBERS SUBJECTED TO BENDING8.1 General8.2 Design Strength in Bending (Flexure)
8.2.1 Laterally Supported Beam
8.2.2 Laterally Unsupported Beams8.3 Effective Length of Compression Flanges8.4 Shear
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------8.5 Stiffened Web Panels
8.5.1 End Panels design8.5.2 End Panels designed using Tension field action
8.5.3 Anchor forces8.6 Design of Beams and Plate Girders with Solid Webs
8.6.1 Minimum Web Thickness8.6.2 Sectional Properties8.6.3 Flanges Cont...
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
3/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 3
SECTION 8 DESIGN OF MEMBERS SUBJECTED TO BENDING8.7 Stiffener Design
8.7.1 General8.7.2 Design of Intermediate Transverse Web Stiffeners8.7.3 Load carrying stiffeners8.7.4 Bearing Stiffeners8.7.5 Design of Load Carrying Stiffeners8.7.6 Design of Bearing Stiffeners8.7.7 Design of Diagonal Stiffeners8.7.8 Design of Tension Stiffeners8.7.9 Torsional Stiffeners8.7.10 Connection to Web of Load Carrying and Bearing Stiffeners
8.7.11 Connection to Flanges8.7.12 Hollow Sections
8.8 Box Girders8.9 Purlins and sheeting rails (girts)
8.10 Bending in a Non-Principal Plane
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
4/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 4
Plastic hinge formation Lateral deflection and twist Local buckling of
i) Flange in compressionii) Web due to sheariii) Web in compression due to
concentrated loads Local failure by
i) Yield of web by shearii) Crushing of webiii) Buckling of thin flanges
RESPONSE OF BEAMS TO VERTICAL LOADING
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
5/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 5
LOCAL BUCKLING AND SECTION CLASSIFICATION
OPEN AND CLOSED SECTIONS
Strength of compression members depends on slenderness ratio
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
6/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 6
(b)(a)
Local buckling of Compression Members
LOCAL BUCKLING
Beams compression flange buckles locallyFabricated and cold-formed sections prone to local bucklingLocal buckling gives distortion of c/s but need not lead to collapse
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
7/33Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 7
L
Bending Moment Diagram
Plastic hinges
M p
Collapse mechanism
Plastic hinges
M p
Formation of a Collapse Mechanism in a Fixed Beam
w
Bending Moment Diagram
BASIC CONCEPTS OF PLASTIC THEORY
First yield moment MyPlastic moment MpShape factor S = Mp/MyRotation Capacity (a) at M y (b) M y < M
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
8/33Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 8
SECTION CLASSIFICATION
Mp
Rotation
My
y u
Slender
Semi-compact
Compact
Plastic
Section Classification based on Moment-Rotation Characteristics
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
9/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 9
Moment Capacities of Sections
My
Mp
1 2 3 =b/t
Semi-Compact SlenderPlastic Compact
SECTION CLASSIFICATION BASED ONWIDTH -THICKNESS RATIO
For Compression members use compact or plastic sections
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
10/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 10
Type of Element Type ofSection
Class of Section
Plastic ( 1) Compact( 2)Semi-compact ( 3)
Outstand element ofcompression flange
Rolled b/t 9.4 b/t 10.5 b/t 15.7
Welded b/t 8.4 b/t 9.4 b/t 13.6
Internal element ofcompression flange
bending b/t 29.3 b/t 33.5 b/t 42
Axialcomp.
not applicable b/t 42
Web NA at middepth
d/t 84.0 d/t 105 d/t 126
Angles bending
Axialcomp.
Circular tube withouter diameter D
D/t 44 2 D/t 63 2 D/t 88 2
Table 2 Limits on Width to Thickness Ratio of Plate Elements
y f 250
b/t 9.4 b/t 10.5 b/t 15.7
not applicable b/t 15.7 (b+d)/t 25
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
11/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras11
Condition for Beam Lateral Stability
1 Laterally Supported Beam The design bending strength of beams, adequatelysupported against lateral torsional buckling (laterallysupported beam) is governed by the yield stress
2 Laterally Unsupported Beams When a beam is not adequately supported against lateral
buckling (laterally un-supported beams) the design bending strength may be governed by lateral torsional buckling strength
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
12/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras12
Design Strength in Bending (Flexure)
The factored design moment, M at any section, in a beam due to
external actions shall satisfy
8.2.1 Laterally Supported Beam
Type 1 Sections with stocky websd / t w 67
The design bending strength as governed by plastic strength, M d ,shall be found without Shear Interaction for low shear case
represented byV
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
13/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras13
V exceeds 0.6 V d
M d = M dv M dv= design bending strength under high
shear as defined in section 9.2
8.2.1.3 Design Bending Strength under High Shear
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
14/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras14
Definition of Yield and Plastic Moment Capacities
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
15/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras15
8.2 Design Strength in Bending (Flexure)
The factored design moment, M at any section, in a beam
due toexternal actions shall satisfy
8.2.1 Laterally Supported Beam
The design bending strength as governed by plasticstrength, M d , shall be taken as
M d = b Z p f y / m0 1.2 Z e f y / m0
8.2.1.4 Holes in the tension zone
( Anf / Agf ) (f y /f u) ( m1 / m0 ) / 0.9
d M M
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
16/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras16
Laterally Stability of Beams
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
17/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras17
BEHAVIOUR OF MEMBERS SUBJECTED TOBENDING
Plastic Range
InelasticRange
Elastic Range
Mp
My
Mcr
Unbraced Length, L
Mo Mo
L
Beam Buckling Behaviour
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
18/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras18
LATERAL BUCKLING OF BEAMS
FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED Distance between lateral supports to the compressionflange.Restraints at the ends and at intermediate supportlocations (boundary conditions).Type and position of the loads.Moment gradient along the unsupported length.Type of cross-section.Non-prismatic nature of the member.Material properties.
Magnitude and distribution of residual stresses.Initial imperfections of geometry and eccentricity ofloading.
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
19/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 19
SIMILARITY BETWEEN COLUMN BUCKLINGAND LATERAL BUCKLING OF BEAMS
Column Beam
Short span Axial compression & attainment
of squash load
Bending in the plane of loads and attaining plastic capacity
Long span Initial shortening and lateral buckling
Initial vertical deflection and lateral torsional buckling
Pure flexural mode Function of slenderness
Coupled lateral deflection and twist
function of slenderness
Both have tendency to fail by buckling in their weaker plane
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
20/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 20
Beam buckli ngEI x >E I y EI x >GJ
SIMILARITY OF COLUMN BUCKLING AND BEAM BUCKLING -1
M
u
M
Section B-B
uP
P
Section B-B
B
B B
B
Y
X Z
Column buckling
3l
y EI
l
EA
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
21/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 21
LATERAL TORSIONAL BUCKLING OFSYMMETRIC SECTIONS
Assumptions for the ideal (basic) case Beam undistorted Elastic behaviour Loading by equal and opposite moments in the
plane of the web No residual stresses Ends are simply supported vertically and laterally
The bending moment at which a beam fails bylateral buckling when subjected to uniform endmoment is called its elastic critical moment (M cr )
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
22/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 22
(a) ORIGINAL BEAM (b) LATERALLY BUCKLED BEAM
M
Plan
Elevationl
M
Section
(a)
Lateral
Deflection
y
z
(b)
Twisting
x
A
A
Section A-A
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
23/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 23
Mcr = [ (Torsional resistance ) 2 + (Warping resistance ) 2 ]1/2
21
2 y
2
ycr L
I E J G I E
L
M
2
1
2
2
21
ycr J G L
E 1 J G I E
L
M
or
EIy = flexural rigidityGJ = torsional rigidityE = warping rigidity
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
24/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 24
FACTORS AFFECTING LATERAL STABILITY
Support Conditions effective (unsupported) length
Level of load application stabilizing or destabilizing ?
Type of loading Uniform or moment gradient ?
Shape of cross-section open or closed section ?
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
25/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 25
EQUIVALENT UNIFORM MOMENT FACTOR (m)
Elastic instability at M = m Mmax
(m 1)m = 0.57+ 0.33+ 0.1 2 > 0.43 = M min / Mmax (-1.0 1.0)
M m i nM max
M m i n
Posit ive
M max M m i n
M m i nNegative
M max
M max
also check M max Mp
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
26/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 26
8.2.2 Laterally Unsupported Beams
The design bending strength of laterally unsupported beamis given by:
M d = b Z p f bdf bd = design stress in bending, obtained as , f bd = LT f y / m 0
LT = reduction factor to account for lateral torsionalbuckling given by:
LT = 0.21 for rolled section,
LT = 0.49 for welded sectionCont
0.1][ 1 5.022 LT LT LT LT
22.015.0 LT LT LT LT
cr y pb LT M f Z /
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
27/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 27
8.2.2.1 Elastic Lateral Torsional Buckling Moment
2
2
2
2
KL
EI
GI KL
EI
M w
t
y
cr
5.02
2
2
/
/
20
11
)(2 f y y LT
cr
t h
r KL
KL
h EI M
APPENDIX F ELASTIC LATERAL TORSIONAL BUCKLING
F.1 Elastic Critical Moment
F.1.1 BasicF.1.2 Elastic Critical Moment of a Section Symmetrical aboutMinor Axis
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
28/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 28
EFFECTIVE LATERAL RESTRAINT
Provision of proper lateral bracing improves lateral stability
Discrete and continuous bracingCross sectional distortion in the hogging moment regionDiscrete bracing Level of attachment to the beam
Level of application of the transverse load Type of connectionProperties of the beams Bracing should be of sufficient stiffness to produce
buckling between braces Sufficient strength to withstand force transformed by
beam before connecting
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
29/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 29
Effective bracing if they can resist not less than
1) 1% of the maximum force in the compression flange
2) Couple with lever arm distance between the flangecentroid and force not less than 1% of compression
flange force.
Temporary bracing
BRACING REQUIREMENTS
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
30/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 30
Other Failure Modes
Shear yielding near support
Web buckling Web crippling
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
31/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 31
Web Buckling
45 0
d / 2
d / 2 b1 n1
Effect ive width for w eb buckl ing
c f t )1n1b( wb P
t d
5.2t
32d 7 .0
yr E L
32t
t 123t
A y I
yr
yr d 7 .0
yr E L
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
32/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 32
Web Crippling
b1 n 2 1:2.5 slope
Rootradius
Stif f bearing length
yw f t )2n1b( crip P
8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam
33/33
Dr S R Satish Kumar IIT Madras 33
SUMMARY
Unrestrained beams , loaded in their stiffer planes may undergolateral torsional buckling
The prime factors that influence the buckling strength of beams
are unbraced span, Cross sectional shape, Type of end restraintand Distribution of moment
A simplified design approach has been presented Behaviour of real beams, cantilever and continuous beams
was described. Cases of mono symmetric beams , non uniform beams and
beams with unsymmetric sections were also discussed.