IS800-8Beam

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    1/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 1

    IS 800:2007 Section 8Design of members

    subjected to bending

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    2/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 2

    SECTION 8 DESIGN OF MEMBERS SUBJECTED TO BENDING8.1 General8.2 Design Strength in Bending (Flexure)

    8.2.1 Laterally Supported Beam

    8.2.2 Laterally Unsupported Beams8.3 Effective Length of Compression Flanges8.4 Shear

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------8.5 Stiffened Web Panels

    8.5.1 End Panels design8.5.2 End Panels designed using Tension field action

    8.5.3 Anchor forces8.6 Design of Beams and Plate Girders with Solid Webs

    8.6.1 Minimum Web Thickness8.6.2 Sectional Properties8.6.3 Flanges Cont...

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    3/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 3

    SECTION 8 DESIGN OF MEMBERS SUBJECTED TO BENDING8.7 Stiffener Design

    8.7.1 General8.7.2 Design of Intermediate Transverse Web Stiffeners8.7.3 Load carrying stiffeners8.7.4 Bearing Stiffeners8.7.5 Design of Load Carrying Stiffeners8.7.6 Design of Bearing Stiffeners8.7.7 Design of Diagonal Stiffeners8.7.8 Design of Tension Stiffeners8.7.9 Torsional Stiffeners8.7.10 Connection to Web of Load Carrying and Bearing Stiffeners

    8.7.11 Connection to Flanges8.7.12 Hollow Sections

    8.8 Box Girders8.9 Purlins and sheeting rails (girts)

    8.10 Bending in a Non-Principal Plane

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    4/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 4

    Plastic hinge formation Lateral deflection and twist Local buckling of

    i) Flange in compressionii) Web due to sheariii) Web in compression due to

    concentrated loads Local failure by

    i) Yield of web by shearii) Crushing of webiii) Buckling of thin flanges

    RESPONSE OF BEAMS TO VERTICAL LOADING

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    5/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 5

    LOCAL BUCKLING AND SECTION CLASSIFICATION

    OPEN AND CLOSED SECTIONS

    Strength of compression members depends on slenderness ratio

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    6/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 6

    (b)(a)

    Local buckling of Compression Members

    LOCAL BUCKLING

    Beams compression flange buckles locallyFabricated and cold-formed sections prone to local bucklingLocal buckling gives distortion of c/s but need not lead to collapse

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    7/33Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 7

    L

    Bending Moment Diagram

    Plastic hinges

    M p

    Collapse mechanism

    Plastic hinges

    M p

    Formation of a Collapse Mechanism in a Fixed Beam

    w

    Bending Moment Diagram

    BASIC CONCEPTS OF PLASTIC THEORY

    First yield moment MyPlastic moment MpShape factor S = Mp/MyRotation Capacity (a) at M y (b) M y < M

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    8/33Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 8

    SECTION CLASSIFICATION

    Mp

    Rotation

    My

    y u

    Slender

    Semi-compact

    Compact

    Plastic

    Section Classification based on Moment-Rotation Characteristics

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    9/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 9

    Moment Capacities of Sections

    My

    Mp

    1 2 3 =b/t

    Semi-Compact SlenderPlastic Compact

    SECTION CLASSIFICATION BASED ONWIDTH -THICKNESS RATIO

    For Compression members use compact or plastic sections

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    10/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 10

    Type of Element Type ofSection

    Class of Section

    Plastic ( 1) Compact( 2)Semi-compact ( 3)

    Outstand element ofcompression flange

    Rolled b/t 9.4 b/t 10.5 b/t 15.7

    Welded b/t 8.4 b/t 9.4 b/t 13.6

    Internal element ofcompression flange

    bending b/t 29.3 b/t 33.5 b/t 42

    Axialcomp.

    not applicable b/t 42

    Web NA at middepth

    d/t 84.0 d/t 105 d/t 126

    Angles bending

    Axialcomp.

    Circular tube withouter diameter D

    D/t 44 2 D/t 63 2 D/t 88 2

    Table 2 Limits on Width to Thickness Ratio of Plate Elements

    y f 250

    b/t 9.4 b/t 10.5 b/t 15.7

    not applicable b/t 15.7 (b+d)/t 25

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    11/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras11

    Condition for Beam Lateral Stability

    1 Laterally Supported Beam The design bending strength of beams, adequatelysupported against lateral torsional buckling (laterallysupported beam) is governed by the yield stress

    2 Laterally Unsupported Beams When a beam is not adequately supported against lateral

    buckling (laterally un-supported beams) the design bending strength may be governed by lateral torsional buckling strength

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    12/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras12

    Design Strength in Bending (Flexure)

    The factored design moment, M at any section, in a beam due to

    external actions shall satisfy

    8.2.1 Laterally Supported Beam

    Type 1 Sections with stocky websd / t w 67

    The design bending strength as governed by plastic strength, M d ,shall be found without Shear Interaction for low shear case

    represented byV

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    13/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras13

    V exceeds 0.6 V d

    M d = M dv M dv= design bending strength under high

    shear as defined in section 9.2

    8.2.1.3 Design Bending Strength under High Shear

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    14/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras14

    Definition of Yield and Plastic Moment Capacities

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    15/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras15

    8.2 Design Strength in Bending (Flexure)

    The factored design moment, M at any section, in a beam

    due toexternal actions shall satisfy

    8.2.1 Laterally Supported Beam

    The design bending strength as governed by plasticstrength, M d , shall be taken as

    M d = b Z p f y / m0 1.2 Z e f y / m0

    8.2.1.4 Holes in the tension zone

    ( Anf / Agf ) (f y /f u) ( m1 / m0 ) / 0.9

    d M M

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    16/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras16

    Laterally Stability of Beams

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    17/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras17

    BEHAVIOUR OF MEMBERS SUBJECTED TOBENDING

    Plastic Range

    InelasticRange

    Elastic Range

    Mp

    My

    Mcr

    Unbraced Length, L

    Mo Mo

    L

    Beam Buckling Behaviour

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    18/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras18

    LATERAL BUCKLING OF BEAMS

    FACTORS TO BE CONSIDERED Distance between lateral supports to the compressionflange.Restraints at the ends and at intermediate supportlocations (boundary conditions).Type and position of the loads.Moment gradient along the unsupported length.Type of cross-section.Non-prismatic nature of the member.Material properties.

    Magnitude and distribution of residual stresses.Initial imperfections of geometry and eccentricity ofloading.

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    19/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 19

    SIMILARITY BETWEEN COLUMN BUCKLINGAND LATERAL BUCKLING OF BEAMS

    Column Beam

    Short span Axial compression & attainment

    of squash load

    Bending in the plane of loads and attaining plastic capacity

    Long span Initial shortening and lateral buckling

    Initial vertical deflection and lateral torsional buckling

    Pure flexural mode Function of slenderness

    Coupled lateral deflection and twist

    function of slenderness

    Both have tendency to fail by buckling in their weaker plane

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    20/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 20

    Beam buckli ngEI x >E I y EI x >GJ

    SIMILARITY OF COLUMN BUCKLING AND BEAM BUCKLING -1

    M

    u

    M

    Section B-B

    uP

    P

    Section B-B

    B

    B B

    B

    Y

    X Z

    Column buckling

    3l

    y EI

    l

    EA

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    21/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 21

    LATERAL TORSIONAL BUCKLING OFSYMMETRIC SECTIONS

    Assumptions for the ideal (basic) case Beam undistorted Elastic behaviour Loading by equal and opposite moments in the

    plane of the web No residual stresses Ends are simply supported vertically and laterally

    The bending moment at which a beam fails bylateral buckling when subjected to uniform endmoment is called its elastic critical moment (M cr )

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    22/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 22

    (a) ORIGINAL BEAM (b) LATERALLY BUCKLED BEAM

    M

    Plan

    Elevationl

    M

    Section

    (a)

    Lateral

    Deflection

    y

    z

    (b)

    Twisting

    x

    A

    A

    Section A-A

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    23/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 23

    Mcr = [ (Torsional resistance ) 2 + (Warping resistance ) 2 ]1/2

    21

    2 y

    2

    ycr L

    I E J G I E

    L

    M

    2

    1

    2

    2

    21

    ycr J G L

    E 1 J G I E

    L

    M

    or

    EIy = flexural rigidityGJ = torsional rigidityE = warping rigidity

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    24/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 24

    FACTORS AFFECTING LATERAL STABILITY

    Support Conditions effective (unsupported) length

    Level of load application stabilizing or destabilizing ?

    Type of loading Uniform or moment gradient ?

    Shape of cross-section open or closed section ?

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    25/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 25

    EQUIVALENT UNIFORM MOMENT FACTOR (m)

    Elastic instability at M = m Mmax

    (m 1)m = 0.57+ 0.33+ 0.1 2 > 0.43 = M min / Mmax (-1.0 1.0)

    M m i nM max

    M m i n

    Posit ive

    M max M m i n

    M m i nNegative

    M max

    M max

    also check M max Mp

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    26/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 26

    8.2.2 Laterally Unsupported Beams

    The design bending strength of laterally unsupported beamis given by:

    M d = b Z p f bdf bd = design stress in bending, obtained as , f bd = LT f y / m 0

    LT = reduction factor to account for lateral torsionalbuckling given by:

    LT = 0.21 for rolled section,

    LT = 0.49 for welded sectionCont

    0.1][ 1 5.022 LT LT LT LT

    22.015.0 LT LT LT LT

    cr y pb LT M f Z /

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    27/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 27

    8.2.2.1 Elastic Lateral Torsional Buckling Moment

    2

    2

    2

    2

    KL

    EI

    GI KL

    EI

    M w

    t

    y

    cr

    5.02

    2

    2

    /

    /

    20

    11

    )(2 f y y LT

    cr

    t h

    r KL

    KL

    h EI M

    APPENDIX F ELASTIC LATERAL TORSIONAL BUCKLING

    F.1 Elastic Critical Moment

    F.1.1 BasicF.1.2 Elastic Critical Moment of a Section Symmetrical aboutMinor Axis

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    28/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 28

    EFFECTIVE LATERAL RESTRAINT

    Provision of proper lateral bracing improves lateral stability

    Discrete and continuous bracingCross sectional distortion in the hogging moment regionDiscrete bracing Level of attachment to the beam

    Level of application of the transverse load Type of connectionProperties of the beams Bracing should be of sufficient stiffness to produce

    buckling between braces Sufficient strength to withstand force transformed by

    beam before connecting

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    29/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 29

    Effective bracing if they can resist not less than

    1) 1% of the maximum force in the compression flange

    2) Couple with lever arm distance between the flangecentroid and force not less than 1% of compression

    flange force.

    Temporary bracing

    BRACING REQUIREMENTS

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    30/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 30

    Other Failure Modes

    Shear yielding near support

    Web buckling Web crippling

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    31/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 31

    Web Buckling

    45 0

    d / 2

    d / 2 b1 n1

    Effect ive width for w eb buckl ing

    c f t )1n1b( wb P

    t d

    5.2t

    32d 7 .0

    yr E L

    32t

    t 123t

    A y I

    yr

    yr d 7 .0

    yr E L

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    32/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar, IIT Madras 32

    Web Crippling

    b1 n 2 1:2.5 slope

    Rootradius

    Stif f bearing length

    yw f t )2n1b( crip P

  • 8/12/2019 IS800-8Beam

    33/33

    Dr S R Satish Kumar IIT Madras 33

    SUMMARY

    Unrestrained beams , loaded in their stiffer planes may undergolateral torsional buckling

    The prime factors that influence the buckling strength of beams

    are unbraced span, Cross sectional shape, Type of end restraintand Distribution of moment

    A simplified design approach has been presented Behaviour of real beams, cantilever and continuous beams

    was described. Cases of mono symmetric beams , non uniform beams and

    beams with unsymmetric sections were also discussed.