IS YOUR PENSION GONE?? INVESTORS GOING AFTER SECURITIES TRUSTS & BANKS

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 IS YOUR PENSION GONE?? INVESTORS GOING AFTER SECURITIES TRUSTS & BANKS

    1/2

    More from WSJ.com:

    Key Tax Breaks at Risk asPanel Looks at Cuts

    Buffett: Combs Is 'a 100% Fit'

    U.S. Seeks to ShieldGoldman Secrets

    by Ruth SimonWednesday, October 27, 2010

    provided by

    More institutional investors are joining efforts to recover losses on battered mortgage

    portfolios amid concerns about sloppy mortgage servicing and underwriting practices.

    Nearly 200 investors are expected t o attend ameeting in New York on Wednesday called"Robosigners and Other Servicing Failures," saidDavid Grais, a New York s ecurities lawyer who issponsoring the conference and represents twoFederal Home Loan Banks that have filed lawsuitsover mortgage-backed securities they own.

    Meanwhile, Talcott Franklin, a s ecuritizationlawyer in Dallas who has been organizing bondinvestors t o pursue their claims against mortgage-loan servicers and sellers, says he has "beenpicking up two to three [investors] a day" as theforeclosure mess deepened in the past t wo weeks.

    Richard Barrent, a former Wells Fargo & Co. executive who now analyzes loanspackaged into securities for possible defects, says he is getting "a spike [in calls from]

    investors who want to know how can we hold servicers and originators accountable."

    The moves show how investors in mortgage securities are venting their frustration withrising losses and questions about how mortgage companies are handling troubled loans.Some of those investors also are sizing up potential strategies for trying to recoup lossesand trying to shield themselves from the cost of any s ettlement between mortgage-servicing companies and state attorneys general, who are investigating mortgage-servicing practices.

    "Investors' frustration has reached a boil in response to monthly loan losses,unexplainable bond write-downs, stonewalling access to loan files, inequitable treatmentof first- and second-lien mortgage loans and ineffective loan modifications," said JonathanLieberman, a managing director with Angelo, Gordon & Co., which invests in mortgage-backed securities.

    The most public display of bondholder unrest came last week when a group of largeinvestors objected to the handling of 115 bond deals issued by affiliates of CountrywideFinancial Corp., now part of Bank of America Corp. The investor group includesgovernment-owned mortgage companies Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, the FederalReserve Bank of New York, BlackRock Inc. and Allianz SE's Pacific InvestmentManagement Co.

    Potential losses to banks from the repurchase of troubled loans could reach $55 billion to$120 billion, according to bond analysts at J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.

    Some investors in mortgage-backed securities say the 50-state investigation is giving apush to efforts among investors to join forces. "The possibility of a ... settlementimposing additional losses for the negligent conduct of servicers upon our retirees hasgalvanized investors to organize and fulfill our fiduciary responsibilities," Mr. Liebermansaid.

    Patrick Madigan, an assistant attorney general in Iowa, which is leading the investigation,said such concerns are misplaced because any deal involving loan modifications wouldbe structured in a way that would benefit investors. "We are only interested inmodifications where the cash flow from the modified payment exc eeds the expectedproceeds from a foreclosure sale," he said.

    Mr. Talcott's group and the Countrywide investors are s eeking to recoup losses under

    contracts t hat govern mortgage deals. One key challenge: Such agreements typicallyrequire that investors gather 25% of the voting rights in the deal to formally trigger theirability to get the trustee to consider action against the mortgage servicerand to bringtheir own action if the trustee declines. Trustees are charged with administering thesecuritizations on behalf of investors.

    Another approach being taken by some investors, including several Federal Home LoanBanks, is to file securities lawsuits seeking to force Wall Street banks to buy backmortgage-backed bonds. That option is typically open t o investors who bought t heirbonds at or near the time of the public offering, but not to those who purchased thesecurities much later in the secondary market, says Mr. Grais.

    Organizing investors has been difficult, partly because of trouble getting acc ess to loanfiles and proving that any defects have materially hurt bondholders. Still, an analysis byMr. Grais's firm of 48 bond deals with a total of 111,552 loans found that more than one-fourth of the loans had inflated appraisals at the time the mortgage was made. In 21% ofthe loans, evidence suggested the owner didn't live in the property.

    "There's a large amount of uncertainty around the risk," said Jack Micenko, a banking

    Mortgage Losses Build Team Spirit

    10/27/2010 mortgage-losses-build-team-spirit: Pers

    yahoo.com//mortgage-losses-build- 1

  • 8/8/2019 IS YOUR PENSION GONE?? INVESTORS GOING AFTER SECURITIES TRUSTS & BANKS

    2/2

    3 comments Show: Newest First

    Post a comment

    analyst with Susquehanna Investment Group. He expects the potential liability to exposebanks "to headline risk for a long time to come."

    Write to Ruth Simon at [email protected]

    ___

    Popular Stories on Yahoo!:

    The New Wall Street: No B ubble, No Profits

    Todd Combs: A Strategic Investment for Buffett

    QE2: The Case for and Against

    Follow Yahoo! Finance on Twitter; become a fan on Facebook.

    1 0A Y ahoo! User 16 minutes ago Report Abuse

    "Potential losses to banks from the repurchase of troubled loans could

    reach $55 billion to $120 billion, according to bond analysts at J.P. Morgan

    Chase & Co."

    Quick, someone take the checkbook away from Tim Geitner.

    Reply

    1 0A Y ahoo! User 20 minutes ago Report Abuse

    I cannot believe these people are s till t rying to rip off taxpayers. Do they

    not know that there is risk in investing? The taxpayer should not have to

    bailout anyone else because someone did not do their due diligence. I have

    lost money on the stockmarket, does that mean taxpayers are going to

    bail me out too?

    Reply

    1 3A Y ahoo! User 33 minutes ago Report Abuse

    Instead of blaming Democrats for Fannie/Freddie maybe we should blame

    Republicans for the banks that sold the toxic sludge to Fannie/FreddieReplies (2)

    10/27/2010 mortgage-losses-build-team-spirit: Pers

    yahoo.com//mortgage-losses-build- 2