9
30/10/17 1 Is Si&ng REALLY that bad? Dawn Skelton On behalf of the Seniors USP Team Cost of Sedentary Behaviour High levels of sedentary behaviour are associated with poor health, regardless of how physically acEve a person is at other points in the day. In the UK, the esEmated direct cost of physical inacEvity to the NHS is £10 billion. The draK ScoLsh Charter for Physical AcEvity reports an economic benefit of £85.2 million if the number of inacEve Scots was reduced by 1% each year for the next five years. CMO (2011) Start AcEve Stay AcEve

Is Si&ng REALLY that bad? - Glasgow Caledonian University · Is Si&ng REALLY that bad? Dawn Skelton On behalf of the Seniors USP Team Cost of Sedentary Behaviour • High levels of

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    7

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Is Si&ng REALLY that bad? - Glasgow Caledonian University · Is Si&ng REALLY that bad? Dawn Skelton On behalf of the Seniors USP Team Cost of Sedentary Behaviour • High levels of

30/10/17

1

IsSi&ngREALLYthatbad?

DawnSkelton

OnbehalfoftheSeniorsUSPTeam

CostofSedentaryBehaviour

•  Highlevelsofsedentarybehaviourareassociatedwithpoorhealth,regardlessofhowphysicallyacEveapersonisatotherpointsintheday.

•  IntheUK,theesEmateddirectcostofphysicalinacEvitytotheNHSis£10billion.

•  ThedraKScoLshCharterforPhysicalAcEvityreportsaneconomicbenefitof£85.2millionifthenumberofinacEveScotswasreducedby1%eachyearforthenextfiveyears.

CMO(2011)StartAcEveStayAcEve

Page 2: Is Si&ng REALLY that bad? - Glasgow Caledonian University · Is Si&ng REALLY that bad? Dawn Skelton On behalf of the Seniors USP Team Cost of Sedentary Behaviour • High levels of

30/10/17

2

WhyfocusonSedentaryBehaviour?

PhysicalinacEvityisthefourthleadingcauseofdeathworldwide

2011CMOguidelinesforphysicalacEvityandolderpeopletoimprovepublichealthrecommendbreakingupprolongedperiodsofsiLng

“AllOlderadultsshouldminimisetheamountofCmespentbeingsedentary(si&ng)forextendedperiods”

CMO(2011)StartAcEveStayAcEve

Whatissedentarybehaviour?

AnywakingacEvitycharacterizedbyanenergyexpenditure≤1.5METs,andasiLngorreclining

posture.

Page 3: Is Si&ng REALLY that bad? - Glasgow Caledonian University · Is Si&ng REALLY that bad? Dawn Skelton On behalf of the Seniors USP Team Cost of Sedentary Behaviour • High levels of

30/10/17

3

AnAcCveDay?

6 hours

30 min

30 min

30 min

4 hours

YES ! But 12 hours

sitting! 30 min

1 hour

SedentarybehaviourinSeniorsUSP

•  WecomparedselfreportwithobjecEvemonitoring•  PeoplearenotgoodatesEmaEngtheirsedentarybehaviour1–  10.5hoursadaymeasuredobjecEvely–  7–8hrssubjecEvereport(dependingonhowasked)–  Approximately2.5hourslowerbyselfreportPERDAY

•  TV/ScreenEmewasmostreliableandresponsivetochange2

1.Chas*netal.IJBNPAHsubmi9ed2017;2.Dontjeetal.PLOSOnesubmi9ed,2017

Page 4: Is Si&ng REALLY that bad? - Glasgow Caledonian University · Is Si&ng REALLY that bad? Dawn Skelton On behalf of the Seniors USP Team Cost of Sedentary Behaviour • High levels of

30/10/17

4

SedentarybehaviourinScotland

•  ScoLshHealthSurveydata–onlyoneagegroupshowslongersiLngEmesperdaythanover75s–those16-24years!–  6.6hoursfor>75sand7.4hoursfor16-24yearolds

•  Television/screenEmeaccountedforoverhalfofleisureEmesedentarybehaviour,regardlessofage.

•  Forthoseinwork,upto45%ofsiLngEmeisatwork!•  Maybebesttotargetthoseatworktoestablishpagerns

ofbehaviourpeoplewilltakeintoolderage?•  MaybeunderesEmaEnghealthrisksforthoseatwork.

Strainetal.JSS2017

SedentarybehaviourinSeniorsUSP•  Disadvantaged(socio-economicstatus,areaof

deprivaEon,educaEonlevel)reCredolderpeoplesitMORE1

–  6%differenceinsiLngEme

•  IfolderpeoplearesCllworking/volunteeringthereisnotsuchastrongrelaEonshipbetweensiLngEmeand(dis)advantage1

•  FearofcrimeandperceivedabsenceofservicesincreasedsiLngEme2

•  OlderpeoplewhoprovidecaresitLESS2

1.Shawetal.BMJOpen2017;2.Shawetal.IJERPH2017

Page 5: Is Si&ng REALLY that bad? - Glasgow Caledonian University · Is Si&ng REALLY that bad? Dawn Skelton On behalf of the Seniors USP Team Cost of Sedentary Behaviour • High levels of

30/10/17

5

Sedentarybehaviourhealthrisks

OlderadultswhoaresitalotdespitebeingacEveatotherEmeshavea42%increasedriskofall-causemortality

OlderadultswhoaresedentaryandphysicallyinacEvehavea127%increasedriskofall-causemortality

MarEnez-Gomezetal(2013)BMCMed.22:47

SedentarybehaviourhealthrisksOlderadults(>60yearsold)whoaresedentaryare:

Twiceaslikelytohavehighbloodpressure,ahighcholesterolraEoandmetabolicsyndromeAlmostfourEmesmorelikelytohaveahighwaist:hipraEo

Gaoetal(2007)DiabetesCare.30:694-700

Page 6: Is Si&ng REALLY that bad? - Glasgow Caledonian University · Is Si&ng REALLY that bad? Dawn Skelton On behalf of the Seniors USP Team Cost of Sedentary Behaviour • High levels of

30/10/17

6

Sedentarybehaviourhealthrisks•  Inolderadults(>60yearsold),increasedsiLngEmehas

beenfoundtobesignificantlyassociatedwith:–  Reducedmusclestrength1

–  ReducedfuncEon(eg.chairriseability,Emedupandgo)1–  Reducedbonestrength2–  Increasedfallsandfearoffalling1–  Lowerqualityoflife1

•  ThosewhobreakuptheirsiLngEmemore(evenifsitforsimilartotalEme)have:–  BegerphysicalfuncEon(theydomoresittostandsinaday!)1

1.Chas*netal.Bone,2014;2.Copelandetal.BJSM,2017

Sedentarybehaviourhealthrisks

•  Inolderadults(>60yearsold),increasedsiLngEmehasbeenfoundtobesignificantlyassociatedwith:–  CogniEvedeclineover8years1–  Reducedwhitemagerintegrityinthebrain1

•  SomesiLngacEviEesarecogniEvelyenhancing1–  Reading,doingpuzzles,usingcomputers

•  ButdependsonwhatpeoplearedoingwhilesiLng!–  IncreasedEmespentsiLngwatchingTVassociatedwithpoorcogniEvefuncEon1

Copelandetal.BJSM,2017

Page 7: Is Si&ng REALLY that bad? - Glasgow Caledonian University · Is Si&ng REALLY that bad? Dawn Skelton On behalf of the Seniors USP Team Cost of Sedentary Behaviour • High levels of

30/10/17

7

Sedentarybehaviourhealthrisks

ComparedtosiLngfor<4hours/day

EachaddiEonalhouroftelevisionviewingisassociatedwitha19%increasedlikelihoodofmetabolicsyndrome(Diabetes)

Si&ngduraCon Increasedriskofdeath

8-11hours/day 45%

>11hours/day 65%

Paveyetal(2012)BrJSportsMed.doi:10.1136/bjsports-2012-091676Gaoetal(2007)DiabetesCare.30:694-700

Si&ngCme,physicalacCvityanddepression

VanUffelen,2013

>7hours 47%increasedrisk

<150minperweek

99%increasedrisk

+ 196%increasedrisk

Page 8: Is Si&ng REALLY that bad? - Glasgow Caledonian University · Is Si&ng REALLY that bad? Dawn Skelton On behalf of the Seniors USP Team Cost of Sedentary Behaviour • High levels of

30/10/17

8

Toomuchsi&ng(orlying)inhospital

Grantetal(2010)JAgingPhysAct.18(2):171-84

OnaveragepaEentswereinanuprightposiEonforonly70minutesperday

70%ofthisEmewasspentinepochsoflessthan5minutesataCme

•  ObjecEvelymeasuredacEvityinUKcarehomeresidentsshowed–  Residentsspent79%oftheirdaysedentary–  14%inlow,6%inlight,and1%inmoderate-to-vigorousphysicalacEvity

•  Barrierstodoingmorethan“mobilise”paEentsonwardsorincarehomesinclude:–  LackofEmetomovepeopletoexerciseenvironment–  Lackofequipment–  StaffinglimitaEons–  Riskcultureofavoidanceoffalls

Barber(2014)JournalAgingPhysicalAc*vityFeb7[Epubaheadofprint]Skelton(2014)Agility(CSP)Summer:20

Toomuchsi&ngincarehomes

Page 9: Is Si&ng REALLY that bad? - Glasgow Caledonian University · Is Si&ng REALLY that bad? Dawn Skelton On behalf of the Seniors USP Team Cost of Sedentary Behaviour • High levels of

30/10/17

9

ProfessorDawnSkeltonInsEtuteofAppliedHealthResearchGlasgowCaledonianUniversityCowcaddensRoadGlasgowG40BAseniorsusp@gcu.ac.uk

hgp://www.gcu.ac.uk/seniorsusp/

MAKEADIFFERENCE

SPREADTHEWORD

STANDUPMORE

MOTIVATEOTHERS