Upload
azalia-armstrong
View
23
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Time domain simulation for a FP cavity with AdLIGO parameters on E2E. Osamu Miyakawa, Hiroaki Yamamoto Caltech 8/14/2006 LSC meeting at LSU. Is it possible to acquire lock with radiation pressure? Is it possible to control alignment with radiation pressure? Optical spring in ASC? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1LIGO-G060396-00-R
Is it possible to acquire lock with radiation pressure? Is it possible to control alignment with radiation pressure? Optical spring in ASC? Do we need test mass actuator for ASC? both ETM and ITM? Is the actuator dynamic range enough? Noise performance?
Osamu Miyakawa, Hiroaki YamamotoCaltech
8/14/2006 LSC meeting at LSU
Time domain simulation fora FP cavity with AdLIGO parameters on E2E
2LIGO-G060396-00-R
What implemented
AdLIGO Quad suspension (Mark’s model 03/31/2006)
Local damping (6 DOFs of M0)
Seismic motion and optical table motion on X,Y, tY and tZ (length, side, pitch and yaw)
3995m FP single cavity with AdLIGO parameters
» ROC = 2076m for both ITM, ETM test mass
» Full laser power inside cavity = 0.73MW
Radiation pressure force on length and alignment
Shot noise and radiation pressure noise
Length control for M3 through M1, M2, M3
M3 alignment control through M2 using WFS
Electronic noise of WFS PD
Main Ref.
Top mass (M0)
Upper Intermidiatemass (M1)
Penultimatemass (M2)
Test mass(M3)
XY
Z
3LIGO-G060396-00-R
Optics
QuadSuspension
ETMSeismicmotion
PDs
QuadSuspension
ETMSeismicmotion
FeedbackfiltersLaser
E2E
FP summation cavity
Rdiationpressure
Rdiationpressure
Mainmass
Ref.mass
Actuator
LocalDamping
4LIGO-G060396-00-R
100
101
10-2
100
Open loop TF
Ga
in
100
101
10-2
100
Suspenstoin TF
Ga
in
rawdamped
100
101
10-1
100
101
102
Feedback filter TF
frequency [Hz]
Ga
in
Local damping
Main Ref.
M0
M1
M2
M3
6(6)
0(3)
0(3)
0(0)
Damped DOFs(OSEM DOFs)
Example M0: pitch
Zero @ 0HzPole @ 10,10Hz
5LIGO-G060396-00-R
Local damping: impulse response
Example M0: pitch
10 15 20 25-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8x 10
-6
Time[s]
Pitc
h o
f To
p m
ass
[ra
d]
Pitch impulse response
E2E simulation Measured data
6LIGO-G060396-00-R0 10 20 30-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5x 10
-5
Time[s]
[m]
Position
0 10 20 30-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1x 10
-5
Time[s]
[ra
d]
Pitch
ITM.m0ITM.m1ITM.m2ITM.m3ETM.m0ETM.m1ETM.m2ETM.m3
0 10 20 300
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8x 10
5
Time[s]
[W]
Power
Quad suspension withradiation pressure (length)
ITM ETM
Radiationpressure
LSC
LSC
LSC
8e-6 rad
1.2e-5 m
LSC only, no ASC
Only TEM00; misalignment not break lock
Test masses are pushed by radiation pressure.
ETM test mass is pushed back by LSC keeping distance between test masses.
Position shift ~10 wave length
Angle shift ~10rad
7LIGO-G060396-00-R
Lock acquisition with radiation pressure
60nm/sec :enough slow to acquire lock for LSC by Matt Evans
Radiation pressure and alignment incleded
Full power : 0.7MW
Lock can be acquired with less than few kW
» Is it possible such low power? Offset lock used at 40m? ->Optical spring
Needs Monte Carlo simulation
Locked
Locked
No lock
8LIGO-G060396-00-R
0 1 2 3 4 50
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8x 10
4
Time[s]
[W]
Power
TEM00TEM01(pit) x10TEM10(yaw) x10
0 1 2 3 4 5-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3x 10
-6
Time[s]
[m]
Position
0 1 2 3 4 5-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1x 10
-6
Time[s]
[ra
d]
Pitch
ITM.m0ITM.m1ITM.m2ITM.m3ETM.m0ETM.m1ETM.m2ETM.m3
Alignment instability with no ASC
After lock acquisition, input power increased with no ASC.
Pitch motion due to Radiation pressure breaks lock with 10%(70kW) of full power if there is no ASC
Lost lock
9LIGO-G060396-00-R0 10 20 30-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5x 10
-5
Time[s]
[m]
Position
ITM.m0ITM.m1ITM.m2ITM.m3ETM.m0ETM.m1ETM.m2ETM.m3
0 10 20 30-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2x 10
-6
Time[s]
[ra
d]
Pitch
0 10 20 300
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8x 10
5
Time[s]
[W]
Power
Test mass alignment control through M2with radiation pressure
ITM ETM
Radiationpressure
LSC
LSC
LSC
1.3e-5 m
ASC
ASC
ASC
ASC
Control M3 through M2
f 3 filter
Boost at 2Hz
10Hz control band width
10LIGO-G060396-00-R
Two modes of optical instability
Differential : stable -> spring
Common : unstable -> no spring
11LIGO-G060396-00-R
102
103
104
105
106
107
Pitch opto-mechanical(suspenstion) TF
Gai
n
0Wcommdiff
100
101
-180-135
-90-45
04590
135180
Frequency [Hz]
Pha
se[d
eg]
102
103
104
105
106
107
yaw opto-mechanical(suspenstion) TF
Gai
n
0Wcommdiff
100
101
-180-135
-90-45
04590
135180
Frequency [Hz]P
hase
[deg
]
Opt-mechanical (suspension) TF
TF from M2 actuator to WFS error signal, simulated in time domain.
Low frequency gain and peak are suppressed.
» Needs compensating gain for full power
Optical spring in differential mode at 4.5Hz for pitch and 4.1Hz for yaw.
Control BW must be higher than optical spring frequency.
Optical spring Optical spring
12LIGO-G060396-00-R
101
102
103
104
ASC pitch open loop TF
Gai
n
0Wcommdiff
100
101
-180-135
-90-45
04590
135180
Frequency [Hz]
Pha
se[d
eg]
Open loop TF of ASC
10Hz control band width
Gain in low frequency is suppressed a lot by radiation pressure
101
102
103
104
ASC yaw open loop TF
Gai
n
0Wcommdiff
100
101
-180-135
-90-45
04590
135180
Frequency [Hz]P
hase
[deg
]
13LIGO-G060396-00-R
Noise performance
Residual RMS: <10-9 rad (depends on servo) of 10-9rad requirement
Actuation torque(force): 3x10-5 Nm (1x10-4 N) on M2 OSEM (max 20mN)
14LIGO-G060396-00-R
100
102
10-16
10-14
10-12
10-10
10-8
ITM pitch
Pitc
h [r
ad
/sq
rt(H
z)]
Frequency [Hz]10
010
210
-16
10-14
10-12
10-10
10-8
ITM yaw
Ya
w [r
ad
/sq
rt(H
z)]
Frequency [Hz]
GroundTableTest massWFS
100
102
10-16
10-14
10-12
10-10
10-8
ETM pitch
Pitc
h [r
ad
/sq
rt(H
z)]
Frequency [Hz]10
010
210
-16
10-14
10-12
10-10
10-8
ETM yaw
Ya
w [r
ad
/sq
rt(H
z)]
Frequency [Hz]
Noise performance in spectra
Spectrum depends on seismic noise model.
Length to pitch coupling is not ignorable, but can be avoided using unbalance of OSEM.
High frequency is limited by shotnoise at 10-14
rad/rHz with 100mW input(25mW for each quadrant).
15LIGO-G060396-00-R
0 1 2 3 4 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10x 10
4
Time[s]
[W]
Power
0 1 2 3 4 5-0.03
-0.02
-0.01
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
Time[s]
[N]
Actuation force on M2
ITM-pitITM-yawETM-pitETM-yaw
Electronic noise with low power
Full power: 0.7MW with electronic noise of 10-6rad/V, 100mVmax, 10nV/rHz
» 10-14rad/rHz (same level as shotnoise), force: 3x10-4Np-p (maximum:20mN)
Low power: 1kW for lock acquisition, 7x10-4rad/V, 100mVmax, 10nV/rHz
» 7x10-12rad/rHz, force: 20mNp-p(maximum:20mN) -> OSEM saturation
Lockedwith 1kW
WFS ON
Startincreasing
power
10% of fullpower
M2 OSEMDynamicrange
16LIGO-G060396-00-R
100
101
102
10-15
10-14
10-13
10-12
10-11
10-10
10-9
ETM pitch: error point
Ca
libra
ted
WF
S s
ign
al [
rad
/sq
rt(H
z)]
Frequency [Hz]
Pit Lopwer(1kW)Pit Full power(0.7MW)Yaw Lopwer(1kW)Yaw Full power(0.7MW)
100
101
102
10-12
10-10
10-8
10-6
10-4
10-2
ETM pitch: feedback point
Act
ua
tion
forc
e [N
/sq
rt(H
z)]
Frequency [Hz]
Pit Lopwer(1kW) PSDPit Lopwer(1kW) RMSYaw Lopwer(1kW) PSDYaw Lopwer(1kW) RMS
Electronic noise with low power
Feedback Penultimate mass(M2) and test mass(M3) for both ITM and ETM?
Low/High gain WFS?
Variable transimpedance of factor sqrt(700)?
» Same level as shotnoise of low power case
Pole around 30Hz?
M2 OSEMDynamicrange
ElectronicNoiseEnhancement
17LIGO-G060396-00-R
0 1 2 3 4 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10x 10
4
Time[s]
[W]
Power
0 1 2 3 4 5-0.03
-0.02
-0.01
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
Time[s][N
]
Actuation force on M2
ITM-pitITM-yawETM-pitETM-yaw
2-pole at 30Hz
Seems stable
Lockedwith 1kW
WFS ON
Startincreasing
power
10% of fullpower
M2 OSEMDynamicrange
18LIGO-G060396-00-R
Conclusion
Is it possible to acquire lock with radiation pressure? » Yes, with less than few kW
Is it possible to control alignment with radiation pressure? » Yes, with 10Hz control band-width
Optical spring in ASC? » Yes, 4-5Hz
Do we need test mass actuator for ASC? both ETM and ITM? » No for full power, penultimate mass actuator enough, but might be necessary for low power
Is the actuator dynamic range enough? » Yes for full power: 1mN of 20mN, but No for low power: 20mN of 20mN -> low-pass filter
around 30Hz Noise performance?
» < 10-9 rad
19LIGO-G060396-00-R
Next step
Unbalance on OSEM
Miss-centering
Another g-factor
Monte-Carlo lock acquisition test
Lock acquisition for full DRFPMI case
» simulation time : real time = 10 : 1 for single FP cavity
= 200 : 1 for DRFPMI with LSC only
= 400000 : 1 for DRFPMI with ASC
->needs summation DRMI for alignment