IRR 50011 Interrnna at tiioonnaall RReellatiioonnss

1

IIRR 550011

IInntteerrnnaattiioonnaall RReellaattiioonnss TThheeoorryy

Pınar Bilgin A328B

(290) 2164

[email protected]

http://www.bilkent.edu.tr/~pbilgin

by appointment

Aims

This course is designed as a post-graduate level introduction to International

Relations theory. The content and nature of International Relations theory is by no

means fixed. Indeed, International Relations theory has been the subject of intense

academic, intellectual and political debates. The main aim of this course is to

introduce students to main concepts of and major debates in International Relations

theory and deepen their insight into the dynamics of theory/practice.

Objectives

The objectives of this course are both subject-specific and general. General objectives

include the development of oral, written and research skills as the course requires

students to become able to read, absorb and critically assess a significant amount of

complex (and at times contradictory) material. The subject-specific objectives include

developing students’

understanding of what is meant by theory and why theorising is an

important enterprise;

knowledge and understanding of the key literature in the discipline;

knowledge and understanding of International Relations beyond their

immediate area of interest;

ability to locate their area of interest within the discipline;

ability to analyse practices of world politics from a conceptual

perspective;

ability to discuss in depth some of the main issues in International

Relations in theory and practice.

2

Teaching

Since the course is taught as a post-graduate level seminar, the onus is on you to read

widely around the topics. The seminars on occasions may include mini lectures

designed to introduce and/or contextualise that week’s topic, but you will be doing

most of the work. My role will be to provide a basic overview of that week’s topic,

offer you contending perspectives on the issues concerned, and seek to generate a

discussion structured around a set of questions. The aim is to encourage you to think

independently and critically whilst remaining firmly grounded in the knowledge

provided by the readings.

The reading list is by no means exhaustive. It should rather be viewed as a representative

sample of theoretical works. In the pages that follow, you will find a list of required and

further readings for each week. Our discussions will be based mostly on the required

readings. The lists of recommended texts are there to provide a broader context as well as

more detail, which may be useful as a starting point and reference for written assignments or

future studies.

What you should remember at all times is that good discussions depend on serious

preparation by students. You are strongly encouraged to read the texts carefully

and prepare written answers to the questions to ensure thorough preparation

especially in the first few weeks of the course when you are less experienced in

participating in seminars. It is critical that you do all your readings and come in

ready to take active part in class discussions. This is critical not only for your own

intellectual development but also because participation is 30% of your overall grade.

Please be reminded that you will only be in a position to do well in your assignments if you

have attended the classes and read the literature (all of the required texts plus some of the

recommended ones). Coming to the classes prepared is necessary not only because this

constitutes a part of your assessment, but also because this will help you understand the

course material much better so that you would be in a very strong position to do well in your

exams/assignments.

3

Assessment

30% of your assessment will be based on in-class participation. You will be expected

to demonstrate evidence of having read and thought about that week’s topic. Your

participation will be assessed on a weekly basis.

You are required to attend all the classes (in accordance with the University regulations). If

you cannot attend please let me know beforehand, or contact me (immediately) afterwards to

provide a ‘legitimate’ excuse for your absence. Attendance will be taken and absences will be

noted.

70% of your assessment will be based on a written assignment. This assignment will

have two parts, one theory-based, one empirical. The theory-based part (30%) is due

November 15, 2010, 17:30. The empirical part (30%) is due January 3, 2011, 17:30.

There will be a one-day workshop during the week of January 3, where all

assignments will be discussed and peer reviewed. Your participation in and

contributions to this workshop will also be assessed (10%). Revised written

assignments (parts 1 and 2 combined) are due January 10, 2011 17:30.

Since no more than one student will be allowed to sign up for each theory, you are strongly

encouraged to make your choices and e-mail me [email protected]. The theory-part of the

assignment is a literature review of the chosen theory (maximum 1500 words). The empirical

part of the assignment is structured in two parts: 1. A concise literature review of

applications of chosen theory (maximum 1500 words); 2. A short analysis of an empirical case

from the perspective of chosen theory (maximum 1000 words).

mailto:[email protected]

4

Please try to follow the requirements listed below when preparing your

assignments:

Be careful not to copy out great chunks from the assigned text or other articles/books.

This is at best weak and at worst plagiarism. Plagiarism consists of any form of

passing off, or attempting to pass off, the knowledge or work of other people as one's

own. It is a form of cheating and is considered an academic offence. The following

are simple guidelines to help you avoid such problems:

Surround all direct quotations with inverted commas and cite the precise source

(including page numbers) in a footnote.

Use quotations sparingly and make sure that the bulk of the essay is in your own

words.

Remember that it is 'what you say' that gives an essay merit.

Make sure you give references to your source(s) throughout the text, not just

when you give direct quotations but also when you paraphrase or give your

version.

Presentation

Each assignment should be typed.

State the number of words used at the end. The word limit is there to make you

decide what is or is not important to say. The ability to say what you want in a

limited number of words is also a skill you need to gain. Essays that are over

length will be penalised.

Appropriate footnotes and/or bibliography should be supplied.

Do not use single-spacing

Leave a sufficient margin for comments.

Pay attention to how you write the essay (your style) as well as its content. It is

important to develop your 'writing skills' as a student of International Relations.

5

What follows is a list of required/recommended readings for each week. Please

also consider the following studies for further research (in order of date of

publication): (Der Derian and Shapiro, 1989, Hollis and Smith, 1990, Rosenau and

Der Derian, 1993, Booth and Smith, 1995, Lebow and Risse-Kappen, 1995,

Burchill and Linklater, 1996, Smith et al., 1996b, Kubalkova et al., 1998b, Fry and

O'hagan, 2000, Jorgensen, 2000, Linklater, 2000, Chan et al., 2001, Crawford and

Jarvis, 2001, Elman and Elman, 2001, Carlsnaes et al., 2002, Brown, 2007, Devetak

et al., 2007, Chan and Moore, 2009, Tickner and Waever, 2009).1

Course Plan

Week 1

Week 2

Introduction: What is IR Theory (for)?

Required reading: (Sterling-Folker, 2006g, Smith, 2007)

Further reading: (George, 1994, Booth and Smith, 1995, Neufeld, 1995, Smith et al.,

1996a, Woods, 1996, Nicholson, 2000, Buzan and Little, 2001)

Week 3

(Neo)classical realism and its critics

Required reading: (Sterling-Folker, 2006h, Taliaferro, 2006, Lebow, 2007, Steele,

2007)

Further reading: (Carr, 1946, Herz, 1950, Rothstein, 1972, Morgenthau, 1985,

Wilson, 1998, Williams, 2004)

1 All required readings are available at the reserve desk of BU library. For edited books, ask for

the book, not the author of the chapter. All required articles are available on electronic reserve of

BU library. Recommended texts are available at BU Library. Please search the Library catalogue

or Electronic Sources to access them.

6

Week 4

The English School and its critics

Required reading: (Suzuki, 2004, Knudsen, 2006, Sterling-Folker, 2006c, Dunne,

2007)

Further reading: (Bull and Watson, 1984, Gong, 1984a, 1984b, Wight, 1991,

Watson, 1992, Bull, 1995, Dunne, 1995, 1998, Buzan, 2001)

Week 5

Liberalism and its critics

Required reading: (Panke and Risse, 2007, Barkawi and Laffey, 1999, Butler and

Boyer, 2006, Sterling-Folker, 2006f)

Further reading: (Doyle, 1986, Rosenau and Czempiel, 1992, Cohen, 1994,

Moravcsik, 1997)

Week 6

Structural realism and its critics

Required reading: (Adams, 2006, Quackenbush and Zagare, 2006, Mearsheimer,

2007, Williams 2009)

Further reading: (Waltz, 1959, 1979, Mearsheimer, 1990, Wendt, 1992, Baldwin,

1993a, Mearsheimer, 2009, Wæver 2009)

7

Week 7

Neoliberalism and its critics

Required reading: (Kay, 2006, Martin, 2007, Tsygankov and Tsygankov, 2007)

Further reading: (Keohane and Nye, 1987, Keohane, 1988, Keohane and Nye, 1989,

Baldwin, 1993b)

Week 8

Critical theory and its critics

Required reading: (Cafruny, 2006, Freyberg-Inan, 2006, Sterling-Folker, 2006e,

Hobson, 2007, Rupert, 2007)

Further reading: (Cox, 1981, 1987, Linklater, 1990a, 1990b, Cox, 1995, Cox and

Sinclair, 1996, Robinson, 1996, Linklater, 1997, Wallerstein, 2006)

Week 9

Constructivism and beyond?

Required reading: (Hoffmann, 2006, Jackson, 2006, Sterling-Folker, 2006b, Fierke,

2007, Sorensen, 2008)

Further reading: (Kratochwil, 1989, Onuf, 1989, Weldes, 1996, Weldes and Saco,

1996, Kubalkova et al., 1998a, Weldes, 1999, Weldes et al., 1999, Onuf, 2009)

8

Week 10

Feminism in IR

Required reading: (Agathangelou and Ling, 2004, D'amico, 2006, Mertus, 2006,

Sterling-Folker, 2006d, Tickner and Sjoberg, 2007)

Further reading: (Enloe, 1990, Peterson, 1992, Zalewski, 1995, Tickner, 1997, Enloe,

2000, Sylvester, 2002)

Week 11

Postmodernism/poststructuralism and its critics

Required reading: (Spegele, 2002, Falger and Van Der Dennen, 2006, Shinko, 2006,

Sterling-Folker, 2006a, Campbell, 2007)

Further reading: (Campbell, 1992, 1993, Weber, 1998, Edkins, 1999, Weber, 1999)

Week 12

Globalisation and IR theory

Required reading: (Freyberg-Inan, 2006, Hay 2007, Halperin, 2006)

Further reading: (Clark, 1997, Clark, 1998, Held and Mcgrew, 1998, Clark, 1999,

Falk, 2000, Scholte, 2000)

9

Week 13

Political theory, the political and international relations

Required reading: (Brown, 2007, Grovogui, 2007)

Further reading: (Linklater, 1990b, Walker, 1993, Williams et al., 1993, Grovogui,

2006)

Week 13

IR: Still a discipline?

Required reading: (Waever, 2007, Bilgin, 2008)

Further reading: (Lebow and Risse-Kappen, 1995, Tickner, 2003, Tickner and

Wæver, 2008, Agathangelou and Ling, 2009, Ching-Chane Hwang and Ling,

2009, Tickner and Waever, 2009)

Week 14

International Relations and Social Science

Required reading: (Hollis and Smith, 1990, Kurki and Wight, 2007)

Further reading: (Cox, 1981, Waever, 1998, Wendt, 1999, 2000, Wight, 2002,

Guilhot, 2008)

10

Bibliography

Adams, K. R. (2006) Structural Realism: The Consequences of Great Power

Politics. In Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations

Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 18-37.

Agathangelou, A. & L. H. M. Ling (2004) Power, Borders, Security, Wealth:

Lessons of Violence and Desire from September 11. International Studies

Quarterly 48, 517-538.

Agathangelou, A. M. & L. H. M. Ling (2009) Transforming World Politics from

Empire to Multiple Worlds, Routledge.

Baldwin, D. A. (1993a) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate,

New York, Columbia University Press.

Baldwin, D. A. E. (1993b) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate,

New York, Columbia University Press.

Barkawi, T. & M. Laffey (1999) The Imperial Peace: Democracy, Force and

Globalization. European Journal of International Relations, 5, 403-434.

Bilgin, P. (2008) Thinking Past ‘Western’ IR? Third World Quarterly, 29, 5-23.

Booth, K. & S. Smith (1995) International Relations Theory Today, Cambridge, Polity

Press.

Brown, C. (2007) International Relations as Political Theory. in Dunne, T., Kurki,

M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and

Diversity. New York, Oxford University Press: 34-51.

Bull, H. (1995) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, London,

Macmillan.

Bull, H. & A. Watson (Eds.) (1984) The Expansion of International Society, Oxford

Clarendon Press.

Burchill, S. & A. Linklater (1996) Theories of International Relations, New York, St.

Martin's Press.

Butler, M. J. & M. A. Boyer (2006) Public Goods Liberalism: The Problems of

Collective Action. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International

Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 75-91.

Buzan, B. (2001) The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR. Review of

International Studies, 27, 471-488.

Buzan, B. & R. Little (2001) Why International Relations Has Failed as an

Intellectual Project and What to Do About It. Millennium-Journal of

International Studies, 30, 19-+.

Cafruny, A. W. (2006) Historical Materialism: Imperialist Rivalry and the Global

Capitalist Order. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International


11

Campbell, D. (1992) Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of

Identity, Manchester, Manchester University Press.

Campbell, D. (1993) Politics without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics and the Narratives

the Gulf War, Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Campbell, D. (2007) Poststructuralism. in Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.)

International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford

University Press: 203-228.

Carlsnaes, W., T. Risse-Kappen & B. A. Simmons (2002) Handbook of International

Relations, London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif., SAGE Publications.

Carr, E. H. (1946) The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study

of International Relations, London, Macmillan.

Chan, S., P. G. Mandaville & R. Bleiker (Eds.) (2001) The Zen of International

Relations: IR Theory from East to West, London, Palgrave Macmillan.

Chan, S. & C. Moore (2009) Approaches to International Relations, Los Angeles ;

London, SAGE.

Ching-Chane Hwang, B. C. & L. H. M. Ling (2009) Lust/Caution in IR:

Democratising World Politics with Culture as a Method. Millennium -

Journal of International Studies, 37, 743-766.

Clark, I. (1997) Globalization and Fragmentation: International Relations in the

Twentieth Century, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Clark, I. (1998) Beyond the Great Divide: Globalization and the Theory of

International Relations. Review of International Studies, 24, 479-498.

Clark, I. (1999) Globalization and International Relations Theory, Oxford, Oxford

University Press.

Cohen, R. (1994) Pacific Unions: A Reappraisal of the Theory That 'Democracies

Do Not Go to War with Each Other'. Review of International Studies, 20, 207-

223.

Cox, R. W. (1981) Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International

Relations Theory. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 10, 126-155.

Cox, R. W. (1987) Production, Power, and World Order : Social Forces in the Making of

History, New York, Columbia University Press.

Cox, R. W. (1995) Approaches to World Order, New York, Cambridge University

Press.

Cox, R. W. & T. J. Sinclair (1996) Approaches to World Order, Cambridge ; New

York, Cambridge University Press.

Crawford, R. A. & D. S. Jarvis (Eds.) (2001) IR - Still an American Social Science:

Toward Diversity in International Thought, Albany, NY, State University of

New York Press.

12

D'amico, F. (2006) Critical Feminism: Deconstructing Gender, Nationalism, and

War. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations


Der Derian, J. & M. J. Shapiro (1989) International/Intertextual Relations :

Postmodern Readings of World Politics, Lexington, Mass., Lexington Books.

Devetak, R., A. Burke & J. George (2007) Introduction to International Relations :

Australian Perspectives, Cambridge ; New York, Cambridge University

Press.

Doyle, M. (1986) Liberalism and World Politics. American Political Science Review,

80, 1151-1169.

Dunne, T. (1995) The Social Construction of International Society. European

Journal of International Relations, 1, 367-389.

Dunne, T. (1998) Inventing International Society: A History of the English School,

New York, St. Martin's Press.

Dunne, T. (2007) The English School. in Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.)



Edkins, J. (1999) Poststructuralism and International Relations: Bringing the Political

Back In, Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Elman, C. & M. F. Elman (Eds.) (2001) Bridges and Boundaries: Historians, Political

Scientists and the Study of International Relations, Cambridge, MA, MIT

Press.

Enloe, C. (1990) Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International

Politics, Berkeley, University of California Press.

Enloe, C. H. (2000) Maneuvers: The International Politics of Militarizing Women's

Lives, Berkeley, University of California Press.

Falger, V. S. E. & J. M. G. Van Der Dennen (2006) Biopolitics: Evolutionary

History and Modern Conflict. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of

International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 288-301.

Falk, R. A. (2000) Predatory Globalization: A Critique, Cambridge, Polity Press.

Fierke, K. M. (2007) Constructivism. in Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.)



Freyberg-Inan, A. (2006) World System Theory: A Bird's-Eye View of the World

Capitalist Order. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International


Fry, G. & J. O'hagan (Eds.) (2000) Contending Images of World Politics, London,

Macmillan Press.

George, J. (1994) Discourses of Global Politics: Critical (Re)Introduction to

International Relations, Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers.

13

Gong, G. W. (1984a) China's Entry into International Society. in Bull, H. &

Watson, A. (Eds.) The Expansion of International Society. Oxford, Clarendon

Press: 171-183.

Gong, G. W. (1984b) The Standart Of "Civilization" In International Society, Oxford

University Press.

Grovogui, S. N. (2006) Beyond Eurocentrism and Anarchy: Memories of International

Order and Institutions, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.

Grovogui, S. N. (2007) Postcolonialism. in Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.)



Guilhot, N. (2008) The Realist Gambit: Postwar American Political Science and

the Birth of Ir Theory. International Political Sociology, 2, 281-396.

Halperin, S. (2006) International Relations Theory and the Hegemony of Western

Conceptions of Modernity. in Jones, B. G. (Ed.) Decolonizing International

Relations. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield: 43-63.

Hay, C. (2007) International Relations Theory and Globalization. in Dunne, T.,

Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and

Diversity. New York, Oxford University Press: 266-287.

Held, D. & A. Mcgrew (1998) The End of the Old Order? Globalization and the

Prospects for World Order. Review of International Studies, 24, 219-243.

Herz, J. H. (1950) Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma. World

Politics, 2, 157-180.

Hobson, J. M. (2007) Is Critical Theory Always for the White West and Western

Imperialism? Beyond Westphilian Towards a Post-Racist Critical IR.

Review of International Studies, 33, 91-116.

Hoffmann, M. J. (2006) Social (De)Construction: The Failure of a Multinational

State. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations


Hollis, M. & S. Smith (1990) Explaining and Understanding International Relations,

New York, Oxford University Press.

Jackson, P. T. (2006) Relational Constructivism: A War of Words. in Sterling-

Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder,

Lynne Rienner Publishers: 139-155.

Jorgensen, K. E. (2000) Continental IR Theory: The Best Kept Secret. European

Journal of International Relations, 6, 9-42.

Kay, S. (2006) Neoliberalism: Institutions at War. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.)

Making Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner

Publishers: 62-74.

Keohane, R. O. (1988) International Institutions: Two Approaches. International

Studies Quarterly, 32, 379-396

14

Keohane, R. O. & J. S. Nye (1987) Power and Interdependence Revisited.

International Organization, 41, 725-753.

Keohane, R. O. & J. S. Nye (1989) Power and Interdependence, Glenview, Scott,

Foresman/Little Brown College Divison.

Knudsen, T. B. (2006) The English School: Sovereignty and International Law. in

Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory.

Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 311-326.

Kratochwil, F. V. (1989) Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical

and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs,

Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Kubalkova, V., N. G. Onuf & P. Kowert (1998a) International Relations in a

Constructed World, New York, M. E. Sharpe.

Kubalkova, V., N. G. Onuf & P. E. Kowert (1998b) International Relations in a

Constructed World, New York, M. E. Sharpe.

Kurki, M. & C. Wight (2007) International Relations and Social Science. in Dunne,

T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline

and Diversity. New York, Oxford University Press: 13-33.

Lebow, R. N. (2007) Classical Realism. in Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.)



Lebow, R. N. & T. Risse-Kappen (1995) International Relations Theory and the End of

the Cold War, New York, Columbia University Press.

Linklater, A. (1990a) Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International

Relations, Basingstoke, Macmillan.

Linklater, A. (1990b) Men and Citizens in the Theory of International Relations,

London, Macmillan in association with the London School of Economics

and Political Science.

Linklater, A. (1997) The Transformation of Political Community: E.H. Carr,

Critical Theory and International Relations. Review of International Studies,

23, 321-338.

Linklater, A. (2000) International Relations : Critical Concepts in Political Science,

London ; New York, Routledge.

Martin, L. L. (2007) Neoliberalism. in Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.)



Mearsheimer, J. J. (1990) Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold

War. International Security, 15, 5-56.

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2007) Structural Realism. in Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S.

(Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York,

Oxford University Press: 71-88.

15

Mearsheimer, J. J. (2009) Reckless States and Realism. International Relations, 23,

241-256.

Mertus, J. (2006) Liberal Feminism: Local Narratives in a Gendered Context. in



Moravcsik, A. (1997) Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of

International Politics. International Organization, 51, 513-553.

Morgenthau, H. J. (1985) Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace,

New York, Knopf: Distributed by Random House.

Neufeld, M. A. (1995) The Restructuring of International Relations Theory,

Cambridge; New York, Cambridge University Press.

Nicholson, M. (2000) What's the Use of International Relations? Review of


Onuf, N. G. (1989) World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and

International Relations, Columbia, University of South Carolina Press.

Onuf, N. G. (2009) Structure? What Structure? International Relations, 23, 183-199.

Panke, D. & T. Risse (2007) Liberalism. in Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.)



Peterson, V. S. (1992) Gendered States: Feminist (Re)Visions of International Relations

Theory, Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Quackenbush, S. L. & F. C. Zagare (2006) Game Theory: Modeling Interstate

Conflict. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations


Robinson, W. I. (1996) Promoting Polyarchy: Globalization, Us Intervention, and

Hegemony, Cambridge; New York, Cambridge University Press.

Rosenau, J. N. & E.-O. Czempiel (1992) Governance without Government: Order and

Change in World Politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Rosenau, J. N. & J. Der Derian (1993) Global Voices : Dialogues in International

Relations, Boulder, Westview Press.

Rothstein, R. L. (1972) On the Costs of Realism. Political Science Quarterly, 87, 347-

362.

Rupert, M. (2007) Marxism and Critical Theory. in Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith,

S. (Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York,


Scholte, J. A. (2000) Globalization: A Critical Introduction, New York, St. Martin's

Press.

Shinko, R. E. (2006) Postmodernism: A Genealogy of Humanitarian Intervention.

in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International Relations Theory.


16

Smith, S. (2007) Introduction: Diversity and Disciplinarity in International

Relations Theory. in Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.) International

Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York, Oxford University

Press: 1-12.

Smith, S., K. Booth & M. Zalewski (1996a) International Theory : Positivism and

Beyond, Cambridge ; New York, Cambridge University Press.

Smith, S., K. Booth & M. E. Zalewski (1996b) International Theory: Positivism and

Beyond, New York, Cambridge University Press.

Sorensen, G. (2008) The Case for Combining Material Forces and Ideas in the

Study of IR. European Journal of International Relations, 14, 5-32.

Spegele, R. D. (2002) Emancipatory International Relations: Good News, Bad

News or No News at All? International Relations, 16, 381-401.

Steele, B. J. (2007) 'Eavesdropping on Honored Ghosts': From Classical to

Reflexive Realism. Journal of International Relations and Development, 10,

272-300.

Sterling-Folker, J. (2006a) Biopolitics. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of


Sterling-Folker, J. (2006b) Constructivism. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense

of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers: 115-

122.

Sterling-Folker, J. (2006c) The English School. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making

Sense of International Relations Theory. Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers:

303-310.

Sterling-Folker, J. (2006d) Feminism. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of


Sterling-Folker, J. (2006e) Historical Materialism and World System Theory. in



Sterling-Folker, J. (2006f) Liberalism. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of


Sterling-Folker, J. (2006g) Making Sense of International Relations Theory. in



Sterling-Folker, J. (2006h) Realism. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of


Suzuki, S. (2004) China's Perceptions of International Society in the Nineteenth

Century: Learning More About Power Politics? Asian Perspective, 28, 115-

144.

Sylvester, C. (2002) Feminist International Relations: An Unfinished Journey, New

York, Cambridge University Press.

17

Taliaferro, J. W. (2006) Neoclassical Realism: The Psychology of Great Power

Intervention. in Sterling-Folker, J. (Ed.) Making Sense of International


Tickner, A. & O. Wæver (2008) International Relations Scholarship around the World,

Routledge.

Tickner, A. & O. Waever (2009) Global Scholarship in International Relations:

Worlding Beyond the West, New York, Routledge.

Tickner, J. A. (1997) You Just Don't Understand: Troubled Engagements between

Feminists and IR Theorists. International Studies Quarterly, 41, 611-632.

Tickner, J. A. (2003) Seeing IR Differently: Notes from the Third World.

Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 32, 295-324.

Tickner, J. A. & L. Sjoberg (2007) Feminism. In Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S.

(Eds.) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York,


Tsygankov, A. P. & P. A. Tsygankov (2007) A Sociology of Dependence in

International Relations Theory: A Case of Russian Liberal IR. International

Political Sociology, 1, 307-324.

Waever, O. (1998) The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American

and European Developments in International Relations. International

Organization, 52, 687-727.

Wæver, O. (2007) IR: Still a discipline? In Dunne, T., Kurki, M. & Smith, S. (Eds.)


University Press:

Waever, O. (2009) Waltz's Theory of Theory. International Relations, 23, 201-222.

Walker, R. B. J. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory,

Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Wallerstein, I. M. (2006) World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction, Durham, Duke

University Press.

Waltz, K. N. (1959) Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis, New York,

Columbia University Press.

Waltz, K. N. (1979) Theory of International Politics, New York, Random House.

Watson, A. (1992) The Evolution of International Society : A Comparative Historical

Analysis, London ; New York, Routledge.

Weber, C. (1998) Performative States. Millennium-Journal of International Studies,

27, 77-+.

Weber, C. (1999) IR: The Resurrection or New Frontiers of Incorporation.

European Journal of International Relations, 5, 435-450.

Weldes, J. (1996) Constructing National Interests. European Journal of International

Relations, 2, 275-318.

18

Weldes, J. (1999) Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban

Missile Crisis, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.

Weldes, J., M. Laffey, H. Gusterson & R. Duvall (1999) Introduction:

Constructing Insecurity. in Weldes, J., Laffey, M., Gusterson, H. & Duvall,

R. (Eds.) Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities, and the Production of

Danger. Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota Press: 1-33.

Weldes, J. & D. Saco (1996) Making State Action Possible: The United States and

the Discursive Construction of 'the Cuban Problem', 1960-1994.

Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 25, 361-395.

Wendt, A. (1992) Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of

Power Politics. International Organization, 46, 391-425.

Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics, Cambridge; New York,

Cambridge University Press.

Wendt, A. (2000) On the Via Media: A Response to the Critics. Review of


Wight, C. (2002) Philosophy of Social Science and International Relations. in

Carlsnaes, W., Risse, T. & Simmons, B. A. (Eds.) Handbook of International

Relations. London, SAGE Publications: 23-51.

Wight, M. (1991) International Theory: The Three Traditions, London, Leicester

University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs.

Williams, H., M. Wright & T. Evans (1993) A Reader in International Relations and

Political Theory, Buckingham, Open University Press.

Williams, M. C. (2004) Why Ideas Matter in International Relations: Hans

Morgenthau, Classical Realism, and the Moral Construction of Power

Politics. International Organization, 58, 633-665.

Williams, M. C. (2009) Waltz, Realism and Democracy. International Relations, 23:

328-340.

Wilson, P. (1998) The Myth of the 'First Great Debate'. Review of International

Studies, 24, 1-16.

Woods, N. (1996) Explaining International Relations since 1945, New York, Oxford

University Press.

Zalewski, M. (1995) Well, What Is the Feminist Perspective on Bosnia?

International Affairs, 71, 339-356.

Documents

IRR 50011 Interrnna at tiioonnaall RReellatiioonnss