IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover ...ir4.rutgers.edu/Ornamental/OrnData/20070110o.pdf · 1 Celero 16WSG (clothianadin) 4 oz, 40.9 a 2 DPX-E2Y45 10 oz 43.1

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture ProgramResearch Report Cover Sheet

Researcher(s) Kris BramanAffiliation: University of Georgia

Department of EntomologyGriffin CampusGriffin GA 30223-1797

PhoneNumber: 770-412-4714Email: [email protected]

Trial: 2006 GA

ProjectTitle: Borer & Beetle Efficacy

PR# Research Target Crop/Plant Product EPA Reg. # Production Site

Protocol #: 06-007

26487 Japanese BeetlePopillia japonica

WillowSalix sp.

Celero 16WSGClothianidin

Field Container66330-52Arysta


WillowSalix sp.

DPX-E2Y45DPX-E2Y45

Field Container-Dupont


WillowSalix sp.

Flagship 25WGThiamethoxam

Field Container100-955Syngenta


WillowSalix sp.

Safari 20SGDinotefuran

Field Container33657-16-5963Valent


WillowSalix sp.

ScimitarLambda-cyhalothri

Field Container-Syngenta


WillowSalix sp.

TriStar 70WSPAcetamiprid

Field Container8033-22Cleary

Final Research Report for 2006 Interregional Research Project No. 4 (IR-4)

PROJECT: Management of Japanese beetles in nursery production with new chemistry. Principle Investigator: Dr. Kris Braman

Department of Entomology University of Georgia, Griffin Campus Griffin, GA 30223-1797 Phone: 770-412-4714 Fax: 770-228-7287 e-mail: [email protected]

Efficacy of Celero 16WSG (clothianadin), DPX-E2Y45, Safari (Dinotefuron ), Tristar (acetamiprid), Flagship 25WG (thiamethoxam), and Precise (acephate) against Japanese beetle adults Objective: The primary objective was to evaluate new insecticides against the Japanese beetle Experimental Procedures: This research was conducted from the Griffin Campus of the University of Georgia. Eighty, five gallon black pussy willows, Salix gracilistyla ‘Melanostachys’, were provided by Harps Farm Market and Nursery, Fayetteville, GA. Plants were maintained under standard irrigation and maintenance regimes during the Japanese beetle flight period. Plants were treated on June 13, 2006 and arranged in a randomized complete block design with ten replications (individual plant reps) in an area with historically heavy Japanese beetle populations in southeastern Spalding County. Products were applied with a CO2 powered back pack sprayer equipped with a meter jet gun. Granulars were applied with a hand held shaker. Beetle density was recorded at one week, two weeks, and one month post application. Height and average width of plants was recorded twice during the study. A final damage (% defoliation) assessment was made one month after application. All data were subjected to analysis of variance using the GLM procedure of SAS and means were separated using LSD. Results: Japanese beetle pressure was high. Within one week beetle density varied by treatment (Table 1) with Scimitar, Flagship, Tristar and DPX-E2Y45 providing significant reductions relative to the untreated control. Celero, Safari and Precise were statistically similar to the utc on that date. At two weeks post treatment all except Safari had significantly reduced beetle densities relative to the control (Table 2). Beetles had declined by the four week post evaluation (Table 3) with only the untreated plants supporting a small but significant population. Plant heights were not significantly different on either date (Tables 4 and 5). Plant widths were affected by treatment at two weeks (Table 6) but not four weeks post treatment (Table 7). Defoliation was reduced in all treatments relative to the control and was least on plants treated with Scimitar, Precise, Tristar or DPX-E2Y45. No phytotoxicity was observed. Table 1. Mean number of Japanese beetle adults per plant one week post treatment

# Product Rate per 100 gal Mean no. Beetles per plant 1 Celero 16WSG (clothianadin) 4 oz, 15.6 ab 2 DPX-E2Y45 10 oz 3.8 bc 3 Safari 20 SG (Dinotefuron) 8 oz 14.4 abc 4 Tristar 70 WSP (acetamiprid) 96 g 1.3 bc 5 Flagship 25WG (thiamethoxam) 8 oz 5.9 bc 6 Precise (acephate) 3 tsp/pot 22.4 a 7 Scimitar (lambda-cyhalothrin) 5 oz 0.4 c 8 Untreated 21.8 a

Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different, P> 0.05 Table 2. Mean number of Japanese beetle adults per plant two weeks post treatment

# Product Rate per 100 gal Mean no. Beetles per plant 1 Celero 16WSG (clothianadin) 4 oz, 16.1 bc 2 DPX-E2Y45 10 oz 6.3 cd 3 Safari 20 SG (Dinotefuron) 8 oz 21.1 ab 4 Tristar 70 WSP (acetamiprid) 96 g 5.1 d 5 Flagship 25WG (thiamethoxam) 8 oz 12.6 bcd 6 Precise (acephate) 3 tsp/pot 11.5 bcd 7 Scimitar (lambda-cyhalothrin) 5 oz 2.9 d 8 Untreated 27.1 a

Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different, P> 0.05 Table 3. Mean number of Japanese beetle adults per plant four weeks post treatment

# Product Rate per 100 gal Mean no. Beetles per plant 1 Celero 16WSG (clothianadin) 4 oz, 0 b 2 DPX-E2Y45 10 oz 0 b 3 Safari 20 SG (Dinotefuron) 8 oz 0 b 4 Tristar 70 WSP (acetamiprid) 96 g 0 b 5 Flagship 25WG (thiamethoxam) 8 oz 0 b 6 Precise (acephate) 3 tsp/pot 0 b 7 Scimitar (lambda-cyhalothrin) 5 oz 0 b 8 Untreated 0.3 a

Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different, P> 0.05 Table 4. Mean plant height two weeks post treatment

# Product Rate per 100 gal Mean height (cm) 1 Celero 16WSG (clothianadin) 4 oz, 43.3 a 2 DPX-E2Y45 10 oz 43.2 a 3 Safari 20 SG (Dinotefuron) 8 oz 42.6 a 4 Tristar 70 WSP (acetamiprid) 96 g 43.7 a 5 Flagship 25WG (thiamethoxam) 8 oz 43.7 a 6 Precise (acephate) 3 tsp/pot 43.0 a 7 Scimitar (lambda-cyhalothrin) 5 oz 43.6 a 8 Untreated 42.0 a

Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different, P> 0.05 Table 5. Mean plant height four weeks post treatment

# Product Rate per 100 gal Mean height (cm)

1 Celero 16WSG (clothianadin) 4 oz, 40.9 a 2 DPX-E2Y45 10 oz 43.1 a 3 Safari 20 SG (Dinotefuron) 8 oz 43.0 a 4 Tristar 70 WSP (acetamiprid) 96 g 42.6 a 5 Flagship 25WG (thiamethoxam) 8 oz 40.8 a 6 Precise (acephate) 3 tsp/pot 42.0 a 7 Scimitar (lambda-cyhalothrin) 5 oz 43.8 a 8 Untreated 40.2 a

Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different, P> 0.05 Table 6. Mean plant width two weeks post treatment

# Product Rate per 100 gal Mean width (cm) 1 Celero 16WSG (clothianadin) 4 oz, 59.5 bc 2 DPX-E2Y45 10 oz 61.2 abc 3 Safari 20 SG (Dinotefuron) 8 oz 62.15 abc 4 Tristar 70 WSP (acetamiprid) 96 g 60.7 abc 5 Flagship 25WG (thiamethoxam) 8 oz 63.0 ab 6 Precise (acephate) 3 tsp/pot 63.7 a 7 Scimitar (lambda-cyhalothrin) 5 oz 64.3 a 8 Untreated 58.5 c

Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different, P> 0.05 Table 7. Mean plant width four weeks post treatment

# Product Rate per 100 gal Mean width (cm) 1 Celero 16WSG (clothianadin) 4 oz, 62.4 a 2 DPX-E2Y45 10 oz 67.4 a 3 Safari 20 SG (Dinotefuron) 8 oz 65.2 a 4 Tristar 70 WSP (acetamiprid) 96 g 64.6 a 5 Flagship 25WG (thiamethoxam) 8 oz 65.7 a 6 Precise (acephate) 3 tsp/pot 67.8 a 7 Scimitar (lambda-cyhalothrin) 5 oz 63.6 a 8 Untreated 64.1 a

Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different, P> 0.05 Table 8. Mean plant damage (% defoliation) four weeks post treatment

# Product Rate per 100 gal Mean % defoliation 1 Celero 16WSG (clothianadin) 4 oz, 44.5 b 2 DPX-E2Y45 10 oz 20.5 cd 3 Safari 20 SG (Dinotefuron) 8 oz 44.5 b 4 Tristar 70 WSP (acetamiprid) 96 g 14.5 d 5 Flagship 25WG (thiamethoxam) 8 oz 29.0 c 6 Precise (acephate) 3 tsp/pot 18.5 cd 7 Scimitar (lambda-cyhalothrin) 5 oz 18.5 cd 8 Untreated 61.0 a

Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different, P> 0.05

Date Max. Temp. (°F)

Min. Temp. (°F)

Rain(in)

Jun 1, 2006 89.1 67.6 0.00

Jun 2, 2006 86.7 65.5 0.51

Jun 3, 2006 84.0 63.9 0.00

Jun 4, 2006 84.6 56.8 0.04

Jun 5, 2006 81.5 59.0 0.00

Jun 6, 2006 82.8 52.5 0.00

Jun 7, 2006 85.8 56.1 0.00

Jun 8, 2006 88.5 63.1 0.00

Jun 9, 2006 88.3 57.7 0.00

Jun 10, 2006 93.6 63.5 0.00

Jun 11, 2006 93.2 69.6 0.00

Jun 12, 2006 91.0 70.9 0.00

Jun 13, 2006 76.1 68.2 0.01

Jun 14, 2006 89.1 65.1 0.00

Jun 15, 2006 90.1 62.1 0.00

Jun 16, 2006 90.1 65.3 0.00

Jun 17, 2006 87.3 65.1 0.00

Jun 18, 2006 87.4 66.0 0.00

Jun 19, 2006 90.5 67.5 0.00

Jun 20, 2006 96.1 70.0 0.00

Jun 21, 2006 97.7 69.4 0.00

Jun 22, 2006 95.5 69.3 0.00

Jun 23, 2006 96.3 68.2 0.58

Jun 24, 2006 90.1 67.6 0.00

Jun 25, 2006 89.1 68.2 0.73

Jun 26, 2006 80.6 68.2 1.14

Jun 27, 2006 87.8 67.8 0.00

Jun 28, 2006 88.3 68.0 0.00

Jun 29, 2006 89.4 61.2 0.00

Jun 30, 2006 91.4 64.6 0.00

Jul 1, 2006 93.4 67.1 0.00

Jul 2, 2006 95.2 71.2 0.00

Jul 3, 2006 94.5 72.0 0.00

Jul 4, 2006 94.6 74.3 0.00

Jul 5, 2006 91.8 72.0 0.04

Jul 6, 2006 81.5 69.4 0.71

Jul 7, 2006 81.7 66.7 0.00

Jul 8, 2006 83.7 62.4 0.00

Jul 9, 2006 86.7 67.6 0.00

Jul 10, 2006 89.1 69.8 0.00

Jul 11, 2006 92.1 71.6 0.00

Jul 12, 2006 93.6 72.7 0.00

Jul 13, 2006 92.3 74.3 0.00

Jul 14, 2006 93.9 73.8 0.00

Jul 15, 2006 96.4 74.5 0.00

Jul 16, 2006 96.1 72.0 0.00

Jul 17, 2006 96.1 74.7 0.00

Jul 18, 2006 96.3 70.5 0.00

Jul 19, 2006 98.1 71.8 0.00

Jul 20, 2006 93.9 72.0 0.00

Jul 21, 2006 94.5 69.3 0.00

Jul 22, 2006 93.0 70.7 0.12

Jul 23, 2006 85.6 69.8 0.39

Jul 24, 2006 88.3 68.0 0.69

Jul 25, 2006 86.9 69.3 0.01

Jul 26, 2006 90.1 69.4 0.00

Jul 27, 2006 93.2 70.9 0.00

Jul 28, 2006 94.3 72.1 0.00

Jul 29, 2006 87.4 69.3 0.45

Jul 30, 2006 84.6 69.1 0.04

Jul 31, 2006 91.4 69.6 0.00

Aug 1, 2006 93.4 72.7 0.00

Aug 2, 2006 92.3 71.1 0.00

Aug 3, 2006 93.9 73.8 0.00

Aug 4, 2006 97.0 75.4 0.00

Aug 5, 2006 92.8 72.3 0.79

Aug 6, 2006 89.8 70.9 0.27

Aug 7, 2006 94.8 72.1 0.00

Aug 8, 2006 93.9 73.0 0.20

Aug 9, 2006 93.6 72.5 0.01

Aug 10, 2006 93.2 72.7 0.00

Aug 11, 2006 89.2 71.8 0.00

Aug 12, 2006 86.7 65.7 0.00

Aug 13, 2006 80.8 64.9 0.00

Aug 14, 2006 86.2 72.1 0.00

Aug 15, 2006 88.7 70.9 0.01

Aug 16, 2006 86.0 71.2 1.33

rep trt date h w1 w2 beetles damage1 1 1 . . . 21 .2 1 1 . . . 3 .3 1 1 . . . 15 .4 1 1 . . . 0 .5 1 1 . . . 16 .6 1 1 . . . 72 .7 1 1 . . . 0 .8 1 1 . . . 0 .9 1 1 . . . 1 .

10 1 1 . . . 28 .1 2 1 . . . 2 .2 2 1 . . . 1 .3 2 1 . . . 2 .4 2 1 . . . 2 .5 2 1 . . . 19 .6 2 1 . . . 3 .7 2 1 . . . 6 .8 2 1 . . . 2 .9 2 1 . . . 1 .

10 2 1 . . . 0 .1 3 1 . . . 3 .2 3 1 . . . 2 .3 3 1 . . . 12 .4 3 1 . . . 43 .5 3 1 . . . 0 .6 3 1 . . . 31 .7 3 1 . . . 1 .8 3 1 . . . 0 .9 3 1 . . . 0 .

10 3 1 . . . 52 .1 4 1 . . . 6 .2 4 1 . . . 0 .3 4 1 . . . 0 .4 4 1 . . . 3 .5 4 1 . . . 0 .6 4 1 . . . 2 .7 4 1 . . . 0 .8 4 1 . . . 0 .9 4 1 . . . 0 .

10 4 1 . . . 2 .1 5 1 . . . 9 .2 5 1 . . . 8 .3 5 1 . . . 3 .4 5 1 . . . 0 .5 5 1 . . . 8 .6 5 1 . . . 6 .7 5 1 . . . 2 .8 5 1 . . . 10 .9 5 1 . . . 2 .

10 5 1 . . . 11 .1 6 1 . . . 1 .

2 6 1 . . . 0 .3 6 1 . . . 3 .4 6 1 . . . 43 .5 6 1 . . . 13 .6 6 1 . . . 2 .7 6 1 . . . 10 .8 6 1 . . . 94 .9 6 1 . . . 0 .

10 6 1 . . . 58 .1 7 1 . . . 3 .2 7 1 . . . 0 .3 7 1 . . . 0 .4 7 1 . . . 0 .5 7 1 . . . 0 .6 7 1 . . . 0 .7 7 1 . . . 0 .8 7 1 . . . 0 .9 7 1 . . . 1 .

10 7 1 . . . 0 .1 8 1 . . . 3 .2 8 1 . . . 47 .3 8 1 . . . 1 .4 8 1 . . . 43 .5 8 1 . . . 8 .6 8 1 . . . 20 .7 8 1 . . . 2 .8 8 1 . . . 20 .9 8 1 . . . 42 .

10 8 1 . . . 32 .1 1 2 38 55 45 10 .2 1 2 46 66 62 10 .3 1 2 43 68 58 7 .4 1 2 45 66 64 21 .5 1 2 37 59 58 8 .6 1 2 44 60 56 10 .7 1 2 42 59 54 0 .8 1 2 42 58 50 19 .9 1 2 50 72 58 32 .

10 1 2 46 60 62 44 .1 2 2 39 63 62 3 .2 2 2 43 57 50 0 .3 2 2 36 56 54 1 .4 2 2 47 62 64 14 .5 2 2 50 66 64 18 .6 2 2 46 64 60 8 .7 2 2 44 70 63 8 .8 2 2 44 56 58 7 .9 2 2 46 66 58 2 .

10 2 2 37 66 65 2 .1 3 2 44 63 60 30 .2 3 2 45 70 60 23 .3 3 2 40 62 63 56 .

4 3 2 46 67 64 46 .5 3 2 38 54 58 3 .6 3 2 46 72 70 8 .7 3 2 45 54 56 14 .8 3 2 42 68 63 2 .9 3 2 38 55 68 5 .

10 3 2 42 60 56 24 .1 4 2 45 64 62 9 .2 4 2 42 60 62 0 .3 4 2 46 60 56 2 .4 4 2 42 60 48 4 .5 4 2 41 70 62 0 .6 4 2 44 60 58 1 .7 4 2 45 56 58 10 .8 4 2 42 60 55 4 .9 4 2 45 68 68 10 .

10 4 2 45 64 63 11 .1 5 2 43 62 65 18 .2 5 2 41 70 78 0 .3 5 2 44 66 62 1 .4 5 2 43 63 64 2 .5 5 2 54 74 68 20 .6 5 2 38 56 58 4 .7 5 2 42 60 56 10 .8 5 2 47 57 59 28 .9 5 2 43 56 57 18 .

10 5 2 42 67 63 25 .1 6 2 39 70 68 25 .2 6 2 42 56 64 5 .3 6 2 38 68 62 31 .4 6 2 45 60 64 12 .5 6 2 45 60 60 14 .6 6 2 40 68 60 1 .7 6 2 45 68 70 0 .8 6 2 48 68 58 17 .9 6 2 50 60 62 6 .

10 6 2 38 60 69 4 .1 7 2 40 64 59 1 .2 7 2 48 72 66 5 .3 7 2 44 68 64 0 .4 7 2 36 64 58 0 .5 7 2 44 76 72 1 .6 7 2 41 65 58 3 .7 7 2 41 56 60 2 .8 7 2 49 69 60 13 .9 7 2 50 62 66 4 .

10 7 2 43 62 65 0 .1 8 2 40 60 62 78 .2 8 2 41 58 54 7 .3 8 2 37 56 55 26 .4 8 2 46 54 68 43 .5 8 2 40 53 70 6 .

6 8 2 44 56 50 15 .7 8 2 39 60 56 6 .8 8 2 47 58 62 36 .9 8 2 46 56 60 31 .

10 8 2 40 60 62 23 .1 1 3 38 58 56 0 402 1 3 42 70 66 0 503 1 3 40 62 64 0 354 1 3 44 70 64 0 805 1 3 35 60 64 0 556 1 3 42 61 58 0 607 1 3 43 55 63 0 108 1 3 38 60 52 0 309 1 3 45 72 64 0 35

10 1 3 42 65 64 0 501 2 3 38 68 64 0 52 2 3 44 62 56 0 103 2 3 42 68 58 0 104 2 3 44 64 66 0 155 2 3 46 74 72 0 356 2 3 44 74 77 0 107 2 3 43 71 68 0 158 2 3 44 60 72 0 209 2 3 48 74 57 0 5

10 2 3 38 71 72 0 801 3 3 39 60 64 0 402 3 3 42 72 64 0 503 3 3 38 67 69 0 554 3 3 44 68 72 0 455 3 3 36 62 58 0 506 3 3 44 78 72 0 457 3 3 45 65 58 0 308 3 3 38 62 66 0 409 3 3 66 60 57 0 40

10 3 3 38 65 65 0 501 4 3 44 65 66 0 252 4 3 41 70 62 0 103 4 3 43 64 57 0 104 4 3 40 64 50 0 305 4 3 42 64 73 0 56 4 3 42 64 66 0 107 4 3 44 61 63 0 308 4 3 43 68 65 0 59 4 3 43 71 71 0 10

10 4 3 44 62 66 0 101 5 3 36 64 66 0 252 5 3 38 74 74 0 303 5 3 43 63 67 0 254 5 3 42 70 76 0 205 5 3 48 68 64 0 406 5 3 36 63 58 0 257 5 3 39 64 65 0 25

8 5 3 44 63 65 0 409 5 3 40 59 58 0 30

10 5 3 42 67 67 0 301 6 3 39 66 72 0 102 6 3 38 74 58 0 103 6 3 42 70 58 0 204 6 3 42 64 72 0 55 6 3 44 72 62 0 206 6 3 43 77 68 0 157 6 3 43 75 65 0 58 6 3 46 68 71 0 259 6 3 45 72 74 0 60

10 6 3 38 60 58 0 151 7 3 38 62 60 0 152 7 3 48 72 59 0 303 7 3 43 63 67 0 304 7 3 38 62 74 0 05 7 3 45 70 74 0 106 7 3 43 68 68 0 257 7 3 44 65 67 0 158 7 3 49 60 72 0 309 7 3 49 63 5 0 15

10 7 3 41 68 73 0 151 8 3 38 72 66 1 802 8 3 40 62 60 1 403 8 3 37 66 63 0 704 8 3 43 63 63 0 755 8 3 39 70 64 0 806 8 3 44 60 64 0 407 8 3 38 61 62 0 508 8 3 44 61 67 1 709 8 3 41 67 60 0 50

10 8 3 38 64 67 0 55

SAS analysis of 2006 IR4 Beetles The SAS System 13:22 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 1 -------------------------------------------- date=1 -------------------------------------------- The GLM Procedure Class Level Information Class Levels Values rep 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 trt 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Data for Analysis of height mw damage Number of Observations Read 80 Number of Observations Used 0 Data for Analysis of beetles Number of Observations Read 80 Number of Observations Used 80 NOTE: Variables in each group are consistent with respect to the presence or absence of missing values.

The SAS System 13:22 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 2 -------------------------------------------- date=1 -------------------------------------------- The GLM Procedure Dependent Variable: beetles Sum of Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 16 8955.30000 559.70625 2.02 0.0254 Error 63 17483.50000 277.51587 Corrected Total 79 26438.80000 R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE beetles Mean 0.338718 155.6898 16.65881 10.70000 Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F rep 9 3326.300000 369.588889 1.33 0.2390 trt 7 5629.000000 804.142857 2.90 0.0109 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F rep 9 3326.300000 369.588889 1.33 0.2390 trt 7 5629.000000 804.142857 2.90 0.0109

The SAS System 13:22 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 3 -------------------------------------------- date=1 -------------------------------------------- The GLM Procedure t Tests (LSD) for beetles NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate. Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 63 Error Mean Square 277.5159 Critical Value of t 1.99834 Least Significant Difference 14.888 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. t Grouping Mean N trt A 22.400 10 6 A A 21.800 10 8 A B A 15.600 10 1 B A B A C 14.400 10 3 B C B C 5.900 10 5 B C B C 3.800 10 2 B C B C 1.300 10 4 C C 0.400 10 7

The SAS System 13:22 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 4 -------------------------------------------- date=2 -------------------------------------------- The GLM Procedure Class Level Information Class Levels Values rep 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 trt 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Data for Analysis of damage Number of Observations Read 80 Number of Observations Used 0 Data for Analysis of height mw beetles Number of Observations Read 80 Number of Observations Used 80 NOTE: Variables in each group are consistent with respect to the presence or absence of missing values.

The SAS System 13:22 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 5 -------------------------------------------- date=2 -------------------------------------------- The GLM Procedure Dependent Variable: height Sum of Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 16 220.400000 13.775000 1.02 0.4445 Error 63 847.087500 13.445833 Corrected Total 79 1067.487500 R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE height Mean 0.206466 8.500391 3.666856 43.13750 Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F rep 9 195.6125000 21.7347222 1.62 0.1299 trt 7 24.7875000 3.5410714 0.26 0.9658 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F rep 9 195.6125000 21.7347222 1.62 0.1299 trt 7 24.7875000 3.5410714 0.26 0.9658

The SAS System 13:22 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 6 -------------------------------------------- date=2 -------------------------------------------- The GLM Procedure Dependent Variable: mw Sum of Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 16 421.112500 26.319531 1.23 0.2724 Error 63 1349.484375 21.420387 Corrected Total 79 1770.596875 R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE mw Mean 0.237836 7.508006 4.628216 61.64375 Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F rep 9 128.1906250 14.2434028 0.66 0.7371 trt 7 292.9218750 41.8459821 1.95 0.0758 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F rep 9 128.1906250 14.2434028 0.66 0.7371 trt 7 292.9218750 41.8459821 1.95 0.0758


The SAS System 13:22 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 8 -------------------------------------------- date=2 -------------------------------------------- The GLM Procedure t Tests (LSD) for height NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate. Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 63 Error Mean Square 13.44583 Critical Value of t 1.99834 Least Significant Difference 3.277 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. t Grouping Mean N trt A 43.700 10 5 A A 43.700 10 4 A A 43.600 10 7 A A 43.300 10 1 A A 43.200 10 2 A A 43.000 10 6 A A 42.600 10 3 A A 42.000 10 8

The SAS System 13:22 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 9 -------------------------------------------- date=2 -------------------------------------------- The GLM Procedure t Tests (LSD) for mw NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate. Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 63 Error Mean Square 21.42039 Critical Value of t 1.99834 Least Significant Difference 4.1362 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. t Grouping Mean N trt A 64.300 10 7 A A 63.750 10 6 A B A 63.050 10 5 B A B A C 62.150 10 3 B A C B A C 61.200 10 2 B A C B A C 60.700 10 4 B C B C 59.500 10 1 C C 58.500 10 8

The SAS System 13:22 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 10 -------------------------------------------- date=2 -------------------------------------------- The GLM Procedure t Tests (LSD) for beetles NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate. Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 63 Error Mean Square 149.7617 Critical Value of t 1.99834 Least Significant Difference 10.937 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. t Grouping Mean N trt A 27.100 10 8 A B A 21.100 10 3 B B C 16.100 10 1 B C B C D 12.600 10 5 B C D B C D 11.500 10 6 C D C D 6.300 10 2 D D 5.100 10 4 D D 2.900 10 7

The SAS System 13:22 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 11 -------------------------------------------- date=3 -------------------------------------------- The GLM Procedure Class Level Information Class Levels Values rep 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 trt 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Number of Observations Read 80 Number of Observations Used 80

The SAS System 13:22 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 12 -------------------------------------------- date=3 -------------------------------------------- The GLM Procedure Dependent Variable: height Sum of Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 16 462.850000 28.928125 1.95 0.0316 Error 63 934.950000 14.840476 Corrected Total 79 1397.800000 R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE height Mean 0.331127 9.161317 3.852334 42.05000 Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F rep 9 346.0500000 38.4500000 2.59 0.0131 trt 7 116.8000000 16.6857143 1.12 0.3594 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F rep 9 346.0500000 38.4500000 2.59 0.0131 trt 7 116.8000000 16.6857143 1.12 0.3594

The SAS System 13:22 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 13 -------------------------------------------- date=3 -------------------------------------------- The GLM Procedure Dependent Variable: mw Sum of Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 16 450.337500 28.146094 0.87 0.6057 Error 63 2040.509375 32.389038 Corrected Total 79 2490.846875 R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE mw Mean 0.180797 8.741306 5.691137 65.10625 Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F rep 9 212.3156250 23.5906250 0.73 0.6813 trt 7 238.0218750 34.0031250 1.05 0.4062 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F rep 9 212.3156250 23.5906250 0.73 0.6813 trt 7 238.0218750 34.0031250 1.05 0.4062


The SAS System 13:22 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 15 -------------------------------------------- date=3 -------------------------------------------- The GLM Procedure Dependent Variable: damage Sum of Source DF Squares Mean Square F Value Pr > F Model 16 21047.50000 1315.46875 6.07 <.0001 Error 63 13651.25000 216.68651 Corrected Total 79 34698.75000 R-Square Coeff Var Root MSE damage Mean 0.606578 46.91721 14.72028 31.37500 Source DF Type I SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F rep 9 1423.75000 158.19444 0.73 0.6798 trt 7 19623.75000 2803.39286 12.94 <.0001 Source DF Type III SS Mean Square F Value Pr > F rep 9 1423.75000 158.19444 0.73 0.6798 trt 7 19623.75000 2803.39286 12.94 <.0001

The SAS System 13:22 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 16 -------------------------------------------- date=3 -------------------------------------------- The GLM Procedure t Tests (LSD) for height NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate. Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 63 Error Mean Square 14.84048 Critical Value of t 1.99834 Least Significant Difference 3.4428 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. t Grouping Mean N trt A 43.800 10 7 A B A 43.100 10 2 B A B A 43.000 10 3 B A B A 42.600 10 4 B A B A 42.000 10 6 B A B A 40.900 10 1 B A B A 40.800 10 5 B B 40.200 10 8

The SAS System 13:22 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 17 -------------------------------------------- date=3 -------------------------------------------- The GLM Procedure t Tests (LSD) for mw NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate. Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 63 Error Mean Square 32.38904 Critical Value of t 1.99834 Least Significant Difference 5.0861 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. t Grouping Mean N trt A 67.800 10 6 A B A 67.400 10 2 B A B A 65.750 10 5 B A B A 65.200 10 3 B A B A 64.600 10 4 B A B A 64.100 10 8 B A B A 63.600 10 7 B B 62.400 10 1

The SAS System 13:22 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 18 -------------------------------------------- date=3 -------------------------------------------- The GLM Procedure t Tests (LSD) for beetles NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate. Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 63 Error Mean Square 0.029167 Critical Value of t 1.99834 Least Significant Difference 0.1526 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. t Grouping Mean N trt A 0.30000 10 8 B 0.00000 10 1 B B 0.00000 10 3 B B 0.00000 10 2 B B 0.00000 10 5 B B 0.00000 10 6 B B 0.00000 10 7 B B 0.00000 10 4

The SAS System 13:22 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 19 -------------------------------------------- date=3 -------------------------------------------- The GLM Procedure t Tests (LSD) for damage NOTE: This test controls the Type I comparisonwise error rate, not the experimentwise error rate. Alpha 0.05 Error Degrees of Freedom 63 Error Mean Square 216.6865 Critical Value of t 1.99834 Least Significant Difference 13.155 Means with the same letter are not significantly different. t Grouping Mean N trt A 61.000 10 8 B 44.500 10 1 B B 44.500 10 3 C 29.000 10 5 C D C 20.500 10 2 D C D C 18.500 10 6 D C D C 18.500 10 7 D D 14.500 10 4

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

Researcher(s) Kris Braman Trial: 2006 GA Affiliation: University of Georgia

GA PhoneNumber: Email:

ProjectTitle: Borer & Beetle Efficacy


0 Japanese Beetle TBD Celero 16WSG 66330-52 TBD

Popillia japonica TBD Clothianidin Arysta 0 Japanese Beetle TBD DPX-E2Y45 - TBD

Popillia japonica TBD DPX-E2Y45 Dupont 0 Japanese Beetle TBD Flagship 25WG 100-955 TBD

Popillia japonica TBD Thiamethoxam Syngenta 0 Japanese Beetle TBD Flagship 25WG 100-955 TBD

Popillia japonica TBD Thiamethoxam Syngenta 0 Japanese Beetle TBD Mach 2 Liquid - TBD

Popillia japonica TBD Halofenazide Dow Agrichemi 0 Japanese Beetle TBD Marathon 1%

granu 3125-452 TBD

Popillia japonica TBD Imidacloprid OHP 0 Japanese Beetle TBD Safari 20SG 33657-16-

5963 TBD

Popillia japonica TBD Dinotefuran Valent 0 Japanese Beetle TBD TriStar 30SG - TBD

Popillia japonica TBD Acetamiprid Cleary

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

Researcher(s) Kris Braman Trial: 2006 GA Affiliation: University of Georgia

GA PhoneNumber: Email:

ProjectTitle: White Grub & Root Weevil Efficacy


0 Japanese Beetle TBD Celero 16WSG 66330-52 Field Container

Popillia japonica TBD Clothianidin Arysta 0 Japanese Beetle TBD DPX-E2Y45 - Field Container

Popillia japonica TBD DPX-E2Y45 Dupont 0 Japanese Beetle TBD Safari 20SG 33657-16-5963 Field Container

Popillia japonica TBD Dinotefuran Valent 0 TBD TBD Mach 2 Granular 62719-473 TBD

TBD TBD Halofenazide Dow Agrichemi 0 TBD TBD Marathon II 3125-549 TBD

TBD TBD Imidacloprid OHP

Documents

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover ...ir4.rutgers.edu/Ornamental/OrnData/20070110o.pdf · 1 Celero 16WSG (clothianadin) 4 oz, 40.9 a 2 DPX-E2Y45 10 oz 43.1