IQ Gardner 1983 Multiple Intelligences Theory (MI) (Frames Of Mind: Multiple ...search.shamaa.org/PDF/Articles/TSIjre/IjreNo27Y2010/ijre... · 2018-03-02 · Learning styles: An overview

و 2010 27خايعح اإلياساخ انعشتيح انًتحذج انعذد / انًدهح انذونيح نالتحاث انتشتىيح

66

Gardner IQ

Multiple Intelligences Theory (MI) 1983

(Frames Of Mind: Multiple Intelligences)

Gardner, 1983

Learning Styles Busato, Elshouti, & Hamaker, 2000

2 انضهيى . و

Guilford, 1980

Cognitive Functions

Intellectual Styles and Learning Styles2007

(Chau, 2006; Denig, 2004 ; Dunn, Denig, & Lovelace,

2001; Nobel,2004; Silver & Perini,1997).

2007

2007

2006

2006

Integration

Conceptual

Understanding

Mazzolini, 1999

2001

فاعهيح تذسيش انعهىو وفك اننًىرج انًذيح3

1

2

3

4

Carin ,1993

4 انضهيى . و

2006

1 α≤.05

2 α≤.05

3 α≤.05

58

14291430


1 Effectiveness

199717

200354

2η

2 Multiple Intelligences Theory (MI

Howard Gardner (Frames of

Mind)1983

20062007

3 Learning Styles Theory (LS)

(Cano & Hewitt

2000, (Silver & Hanson ,

1998

6 انضهيى . و

2006

4

Integrated Teaching Model Based on Multiple Intelligences Theory and Learning Styles Theory

5 Conceptual Understanding

2002

303(Wiggins & Mctighe,1999)

Explain

Interpret

Apply

Perspective

:Empathy

Self Knowledge


6 Learning Motivation

19942425

Multiple Intelligences Theory

1995

(Armstrong , 1994; Gardner,1993 ; Haggarty, 1995)

Verbal Linguistic Intelligence

2 Logical Mathematical Intelligence

3 Visual Spatial Intelligence

4 Musical Rhythmic Intelligence

8 انضهيى . و

5 Bodily Kinesthetic Intelligence

6 Interpersonal Intelligence

7 Intrapersonal Intelligence

8 Naturalist Intelligence

2003

Profiles

Goodenough, 2000; Hodson,

19982004200120042008

2008200420062004

Learning Styles Theory

Carl Jung

Jung

McCaulley ,1990

Jung

Silver & Hanson


2006

Integrated Teaching Model Based on Multiple Intelligences Theory and Learning Styles Theory

2006

2006

1

2

3

4

5

10 انضهيى . و

Silver et al., 1997

(Denig, 2004; Dunn et al., 2001)

Chau ,

2006

2006

Conceptual Understanding

2003296

( Wiggins & Mctighe, 1998

2005

2005

2006

(Duffy & Zeidler , 1996

(Cavalcante et

al., 1997

Mazzolini, 1999


Learning Motivation

Gottfried , 1994

2004Petri & Govern, 2004 ;

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Duda & Nicholl , 1992;

Busato , 2000; Joseph , 1994 19962006

Kilinger

1990

Mc Ewan, 19992000


Quasi Experimental Design

Huck et al., 1974

33

33

1

1

2

14291430

1987


1

3

انكشف عن انزكاءاخ وأصانية انتعهى نذي انطانثاخ

(لائًح ديح انزكاءاخ وأصانية انتعهى )

تحذيذ نىع انذسس واألهذاف

يتطهة رنك اإلخاتح عن انضؤانين

تطىيش لائًح تفشص انتعهى نكم ركاء

فحض انثذائم واختياس األنشطح األكثش يالءيح نتحميك األهذاف

تحذيذ أنشطح األصهىب واالصتشاتيدياخ

تدهيز خطح تتاتعيح

(يصفىفح انذسس / خذول )

انتمىيى وفك اننًىرج انًذيح

دسس الصتخذاو أصانية -

انتعهى وانزكاءاخ انًتعذدج

يحتىي نتحميك أهذاف

يحذدج؟دسس يشكز عهً تنًيح -

أصانية أو ركاءاخ يعينح؟

: هم أنا أعًم عهً إعذاد -

دسس يشكم خزءًا ين -

يىضىع في انًنهح يضتغشق

تذسيضه طىال انعاو انذساصي

كهه؟

دسس ين أخم تعهيى هذف -

يحذد؟

دسس يعانح حاخح يعينح -

نهطانثاخ؟



4

5

6

85

3

20

.81

45

82


5011

1012

746

68

20

.95

.83-

.37.33-.81

65


Likert36

2511

5

5,25,3

15,1(Shrigly & Kaballa ,1984)

2007

t-test

27

27

α≤.05

o.92

25

26


1

13111429

877980

20111429

ANOVA

1

0.06 1 0.06

0.04 0.843 98.06641.53

0.02 1 0.02

0.01 0.911 77.15641.21

0.06 1 0.06

0.02 0.885 183.21642.86

0.00 1 0.00

0.00 1.000 33.46640.52

0.24 1 0.24 0.63 0.432

24.79640.39

0.24 1 0.24

0.49 0.486 31.58640.49

1.23 1 1.23 0.15 0.701

527.64648.24

5.47 1 5.47

0.40 0.528 868.976413.58


1

1

2

17

3

1

α≤.05

2

20.05


2

787.64 1 787.64

239.08 *0.000 210.85643.30

280.24 1 280.24

243.97 *0.000 73.52641.15

1372.74 1 1372.74

423.37 *0.000 207.52643.24

157.64 1 157.64

174.49 *0.000 57.82640.90

78.55 1 78

197.49 *0.000 25.46640.40

142.56 1 142.56

212.33 *0.000 42.97640.67

13274.18113274.18 1366.37*0.000

621.76649.72

*α≤.05

3

30.05

16.3

7.6717.674.643.093.8553.21

9.393.558.551.550.910.91

24.85

0.73

0.96


1991

2

2

3

33 16.30 1.38

15.46 0.000* 0.79 33 9.39 2.16

33 7.67 1.11

15.62 0.000* 0.79 33 3.55 1.03

33 17.67 1.74

20.58 0.000* 0.87 33 8.55 1.86

33 4.64 0.82

13.21 0.000* 0.73 33 1.55 1.06

33 3.09 0.52

14.05 0.000* 0.76 33 0.91 0.72

33 3.85 0.94

14.57 0.000* 0.77 33 0.91 0.68

3353.212.8636.96 0.000* 0.96

33 24.853.36

*α≤.05


2003

2006

Goodenough, 2000;

Hodson, 19982004200120042008

2008200420062004

2

α≤05,0

4

4

16168.02 1 16168.02 1358.81 0.000*

761.526411.90

*α≤.05

4.05


5

33 122.27 2.63 36.86 0.000* 0.96

33 90.97 4.11

5.05

122.27

90.97

0.9696

2006

2004

Petri & Govern , 2004

Hodson,1998

3

6


6

.98*0.01

*α≤.05

6

.01

2000

2001

Busato et al. , 2000; Duda & Nicholls,

1992; Joseph, 1994;19962006


1991

2007

2004

2001

525579

2006

2006

933

1996

31119

2004

2003

28

2003


2008

2008

4187

2002100

2003

2006

2003

2006

2005

191228

2004

74199235

2007

295774

2005

299

345

1987


1990

551949

1994

1997

2006

3201223

2006

935199

2000

272398413

2004

2006

2001

10

2002

2007

2007

2004

159201


Busato, v., Prins ,F.,Elshouit , J.& Hamaker,C.(2000). Intellectual ability, learning

styles, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of

psychology students in higher education. Personality and Individual

Differences, 29, 1057-1068.

Cano, F & Hewitt, E (2000). Learning and thinking styles: An analysis of their

interrelationship and influence on academic achievement. Educational

Psychology, 20 (4), 414-430.

Carin, A. (1993). Teaching science through discovery. 7th edition. New York,

Merrill an Imprint of Macmillan Publishing Company.

Cassidy,S. (2004). Learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and

measures. Educational Psychology, 24(4), 419-444.

Cavalcante, P. et al. (1997). The effect of various kinds of lessons on conceptual

understanding in science. Research in Science and Technology, 15(2), 185-

193.

Chau, M. (2006). Connecting learning styles and multiple intelligences theories

through learning strategies: An online tutorial for library instruction. Retrieved

7Jan 2009 from http://libres.curtin.edu.au./libres16n1/index.htm.

Denig, S. (2004). Multiple intelligences and learning styles: Two complementary

dimensions. Teachers College Record, 106(1), 96-111.

Duda, J. & Nicholl, J. (1992). Dimension of achievement motivation in

schoolwork and sport. Journal of Educational Psychology, 48 (3), 290- 299.

Duffy, M., Zeidler, D. (1996, April). The effects of grouping and instructional

strategies on conceptual understanding and critical thinking skills in the

secondary biology classroom. Paper Presented at 69th Annual Meeting of

National Association for Research in Science Teaching. St. Louis, Mo.

Dunn, R., Denig, S., & Lovelace, M. (2001). Multiple intelligences and learning

styles: Two sides of the same coin or different strokes for different folks?

Teacher Librarian, 28 (3), 9-15.

Gardner,H.(1983).Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New

York, Basic Books.

Gardner,H.(1993). Multiple intelligence: The theory in practice. NewYork , Basic

Books

Gardner,H.(1999). Intelligences reframed multiple intelligences for the 21st

century. New York, Basic Books.

Goodnough, K. (2000). Exploring multiple intelligences theory in the context of

science education: An action research approach, Dis. Abs. Int. 61(6), 2164.

Goodnough ,K.(2001). Multiple intelligences theory: A framework for

personalizing science curricula. Journal of School Science and Mathematics,

101(4), 181-193.

Gottfried, A. (1994). Role of parental motivation practice in children's academic

intrinsic motivation and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86

(1), 104-113.

Goughin,G. et al. (1992, November): Distance learner, approaches to studying the

nature of deep and surface approaches reconsidered. Paper Presented at The

World Conference of International Council for Distance Education, 16 th

Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 8-13.

Guilford, J. (1980). Cognitive styles: What are they? Educational and

Psychological Measurement, 40 (3), 715-737. Haggarty, B.

http://libres.curtin.edu.au./libres16n1/index.htm


(1995): Nurturing multiple intelligences: A guide to multiple intelligence’s

theory and teaching. New York, Addison Wesley.

Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and Learning Science: Towards a personalized

approach. Philadelphia, PA., Open University Press. Retrieved in 12

January2009 from:

http://www. Multiple Intelligence: Theory and Practice in the 12 Classroom.

Huck, S. et.al. (1974). Reading statistics and research. Harper and Row,

Publishers, New York.

Jones , ch.& Richard,K.(2003). Are students' learning styles discipline specific?

Journal of Research and Practice, 27, 363-375.

Joseph, J. (1994). Influence of motivation and gender on secondary school

student's academic performance in Nigeria. Journal of Social Psycology,

134(5), 695- 711.

Lach, c. (2003). Weaving technology and multiple intelligences into science

learning. Leading With Technology, 30(6), 27-39.

Lim, c. (2001). Effects of project activities based on multiple Intelligences to

elementary school science Children’s Achievement. Journal of the Korean

Association for Research in Science Education.2 (1), 43-56.

Mazzolini, A. (1999).Testing conceptual understanding in physics using a browser-

based computer manages system. Cal-Laborite, 3, October, 1-11.

McCaulley, M. (1990). The Mayers- Briggs type indicator: A Measure for

individual and groups. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and

Development, 22, 181-195.

Noble, T. (2004). Integrating the revised Bloom's Taxonomy with multiple

intelligences: A planning tool for curriculum differentiation. Teachers College

Record, 106, (1), 193 – 211.

Petri.H.& Govern,J.(2004). Motivation: Theory, research and application.

Thomson-Wadsworth, Australia.

Searson, R. & Dunn, R. (2001). The learning style teaching model. Science and

Childern, 38 (5), 17-26.

Shewart, A.(2004). Using the theory of multiple intelligences to enhance science

education. Master degree thesis, University of Toledo.

Tippett, Ch. (2003). Demonstrating understanding in science: Connection to

learning styles. Canadian Children, 28 (1), 35-44.

Wiggines, G. & Mctighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Association for

Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria.


The Effectiveness of Teaching Science according to the Integrated

Model Based on Multiple Intelligences Theory and Learning Styles

Theory in Developing a Conceptual Understanding and Learning

Motivation among the Preparatory School Students

Malak Mohamed Al Soleem,

Princess Norah bent Abdurrahman Al-Saud- K.S.A University of

Abstract: The present study is devoted to investigate the effect of teaching science

according to integrated model based on multiple intelligences theory and learning styles

theory in developing a conceptual understanding and learning motivation among the

preparatory school students. The sample consist of (66) students from Riyadh Preparatory

Schools divided into tow groups (experimental and control), the control group studied

(subjects of properties of material) used regular method, while experimental group studied

the same subjects according to the integrated model. To verify the validity of the

hypotheses, researcher used tow tools (a conceptual understanding test and learning

motivation scale). Results showed the effectiveness of integrated model in developing

conceptual understanding and learning motivation and a positive relationship between the

conceptual understanding and learning motivation.

Keywords: teaching science; multiple intelligences; learning styles; conceptual

understanding; learning motivation; preparatory students; KSA.

Documents

IQ Gardner 1983 Multiple Intelligences Theory (MI) (Frames Of Mind: Multiple ...search.shamaa.org/PDF/Articles/TSIjre/IjreNo27Y2010/ijre... · 2018-03-02 · Learning styles: An overview