Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
JUNE 7, 2019
INVESTMENT GRADE AUDIT SUMMARY REPORT
JENKINTOWN
SCHOOL DISTRICT in support of Act 77/39 Guaranteed Energy Savings Agreement (GESA)
Reynolds Energy Services, Inc.
3300 North 3rd St.
Harrisburg, PA 17110
717.238.5737
www.ReynoldsSolutions.com
Jenkintown School District Page 1
June 7, 2019 IGA Summary – REV FINAL
Investment Grade Audit Summary
Table of Contents
Project Summary
• Overview
• Utility Analysis
• Scope of Work Summary
• Savings Summary
• Financial Summary
Schedules (exhibits to be included with the GESA)
A Scope of Work
B Project Costs and Cash Flow Analysis
C Guaranteed Energy Savings
D Compensation to Reynolds
E Baseline Energy Consumption
F Baseline and Adjustments; Measurement and Verification Methodologies
G Construction and Installation Schedule
H Systems Start-Up and Commissioning
I Standards of Comfort – Set Points
J Maintenance Responsibilities
Jenkintown School District Page 2
June 7, 2019 IGA Summary – REV FINAL
Investment Grade Audit Summary
Overview
Reynolds Energy Services (RES) has completed the Investment Grade Audit (IGA) for Jenkintown School
District (JSD). During this process, RES has analyzed the overall potential for energy and cost savings;
developed detailed scopes of work; estimated pricing and savings estimates; and has compiled the
financial analysis. This document summarizes the utility analysis, scope of work and project financial
analysis for the project.
The goal of this project is to achieve a reduction in purchased energy and utilize the associated cost savings
to pay down the cost of the planned improvements. Initial auditing indicated that the two separate
existing HVAC control systems appear to not be effectively scheduling building systems, nor providing
efficient space temperature control. The major source of energy savings will be achieved through the
installation of a new building automation system (BAS), as well as commissioning and installing associated
sensors to be able to optimize the operation of the building HVAC systems.
This project will be implemented under a guaranteed energy savings agreement (GESA) with a guaranteed
fixed price for construction and implementation. The following pages include a summary of the key
information about this project, including the utility basis for savings, a summary of the scope of work, the
expected annual energy and cost savings produced from project implementation, and the financial
justification for the project.
Utility Analysis
The following tables and figures illustrate the total baseline energy use and cost of Jenkintown School
District. This baseline represents the projected energy use and costs without implementing any energy
saving measures. This becomes the baseline or starting point for savings estimates and financial analysis.
Reynolds did a building square footage analysis and is using approximately 150,000 sqft for benchmarking
and evaluation purposes.
The starting point for the energy audit was to assess the current annual energy usage for the building. To
begin this process we examined and analyzed 24 months (June 2017 through May 2019) of utility bills. The
table below contains the annual utility summary for the site.
TABLE: Annual Utility Summary by Building
Costs used in the analysis are indicative of utility information provided by Jenkintown SD. PECO provides
distribution services for both natural gas and electricity. The electric commodity charges are provided
through Direct Energy. The natural gas commodity charges are provided through UGI Energy Services.
Electric rates were derived to be $0.069/kWh and $7.10/kW. A combined natural gas rate of $0.70/CCF was
derived from both accounts provided. Water billing is provided through Aqua Pennsylvania, Inc. and their
rates start at $10 per kGal. for the first 10 kGal., then are tiered at $8.875 for the next 23 kGal., and $7.288 for
the remaining kGal. Reynolds did not pursue any water savings as a part of this GESA; therefore, the rates
were not used in the savings analysis.
Building Name kWh Peak kW $ ccf $ kgal $ $ $/sf-yr
Jenkintown SD Bui lding 1,682,907 431 151,251$ 69,281 48,843$ 1,061 8,879$ 208,973$ 1.39$
Electric Water/SewerFuels TOTAL
Jenkintown School District Page 3
June 7, 2019 IGA Summary – REV FINAL
Investment Grade Audit Summary
Energy Benchmarking Analysis
The next step is to analyze how and where the energy is being used in the building by evaluating its energy
use intensity (EUI). The EUI of the building is compared to average or expected use of peer buildings in
similar climate conditions as well as to other Pennsylvania school buildings in our database. Additionally,
we evaluate the building against proven results from Reynolds projects. The following table summarizes
the energy and cost indices for the Jenkintown SD building as compared to these other indices.
TABLE: Resource and Cost Indices By Building
As the figure below indicates, savings potential exists in both electrical usage and fuel usage when
compared to the reference indices for typical buildings.
FIGURE: Energy Indices by Building
Typically, Reynolds has achieved reductions in both of these areas through implementation of new lighting
and HVAC systems. Given the scope of this project, Reynolds combined statistical results as well as an End-
Use Analysis to derive savings. The End-Use Analysis is futher described in the following section.
COSTS
Electric Fuels Tota l Energy Water Energy
Building Name kBTU/sf-yr kBTU/sf-yr kBTU/sf-yr kgal/sf-yr $/sf-yr
Jenkintown SD Bui lding 38.3 47.6 85.9 7.1 1.33$
Reynolds Projects (K-12 PA) 24.7 35.6 60.3 - 1.13$
K-12 Reference (USDOE) 23.6 44.7 68.3 na na
RESOURCES
Jenkintown School District Page 4
June 7, 2019 IGA Summary – REV FINAL
Investment Grade Audit Summary
End-Use Analysis
With the overall usage of the facility being analyzed we look at how and where the energy is being used in
the building, this is referred to as “End Use Analysis”.
We perform an end use analysis to investigate how and where the energy is being used in the building by
using data from HVAC schedules, site observations, and hours provided during site visits. Typically RES aims
for a modeled value within 5% accuracy of the given baseline data. The following page shows a modeled
accuracy within 5% of annual values. The end use analysis is detailed in the following pages. The chart
below summarizes the results of the end use analysis and provides a breakdown of where the combined
electric and natural gas costs are being spent as a percentage of end use.
END USE UTILITY COST
The pie chart helps further validate that most of costs and savings potential lies within the HVAC
components of the facility’s utility expenditures (over 70%). The proposed BAS improvements will impact
these areas in energy usage and cost savings. The next page identifies the areas (highlighted in yellow) that
will be impacted as a result of the energy savings project.
Jenkintown School District Page 5
June 7, 2019 IGA Summary – REV FINAL
Investment Grade Audit Summary
Jenkintown School District Page 6
June 7, 2019 IGA Summary – REV FINAL
Investment Grade Audit Summary
Scope of Work Summary
The main goal of this IGA is to identify and develop a scope of work that improves operations and
maximizes savings to be leveraged toward buying down the overall project cost. At the same time, this
scope needs to meet the needs of the District, be cost effective, and fit within the project’s overall financial
constraints.
The following section summarizes the scope of work broken down by energy efficiency measure (EEM).
EEM #1 – Building Automation System Improvements
JSD has two building automation systems (BAS). A Teletrol Envoy system was installed as part of the 2006
renovation and controls nearly all the air handlers, unit ventilators, baseboard radiators, exhaust fans, etc.
Another BAS, called Ubiquity, was installed between the time the mechanical maintenance contract
switched from Peirce-Phelps to Temperature Control Services (“TCS”). It was installed to replace what have
been reported as failed controllers. Ubiquity controls the central heating & cooling plant and a few
scattered pieces of equipment throughout the building. These controls systems do not appear to be
functioning uniformly and furthermore, scheduling and implementation of controls sequences is
questionable.
Reynolds recommends installing a new BAS that fully integrates nearly all components of the installed
HVAC systems and optimizes energy usage through commissioned controlled sequences (Schedule A of
the GESA will provide full details).
The following work is not included from the base project, but is rather presented below as Alternate scope
items for further consideration:
1. Installation of new controllers for existing variable air volume (VAV) boxes. Integration included.
2. Replacement of variable frequency drives (VFDs).
3. Replacement of the Gymnasium relief fans.
4. Replacement of the electric control panel serving the Gymnasium area exhaust and
heating/ventilating fans.
5. Integration of the photovoltaic data acquisition.
6. Air-side balancing.
7. Hydronic balancing.
8. Retro-commissioning.
Alternate #1 – Install Variable Air Volume (VAV) Controllers
The administration area has antiquated controllers for the VAV boxes that are currently serving those
spaces. The ability of the existing controls to adequately achieve temperature control as well as implement
energy strategies is questionable. Reynolds recommends replacing these controls to ensure energy and
indoor environmental quality (IEQ) optimization.
Alternate #2 – Solar PV Data Acquisition
There is a photovoltaic (PV) solar array installed on the roof of ‘C’ section of the building. The monitoring
system for this PV solar array is no longer supported.
Jenkintown School District Page 7
June 7, 2019 IGA Summary – REV FINAL
Investment Grade Audit Summary
Reynolds recommends providing a new monitoring system to be displayed on the existing dashboard
display in the main lobby. Campbell Scientific Solar 200 is recommended. This monitoring software system
will display real-time power production of the POV array and associated greenhouse gas emission
reductions. In addition, the array output will be integrated with the new BAS for monitoring and display
within the graphical user interface to be provided with the new BAS.
Alternate #3 – ES Gym Relief Fan Replacement and Electric control panel for Gym area fans.
Although the existing gymnasium relief fans are operational, these fans are old and antiquated. In
addition, there is an old an antiquated electric, relay-based control cabinet that controls numerous
exhaust/relief fans serving areas around the gymnasium (e.g. locker rooms, ticket booth etc.).
Reynolds recommends replacing the gymnasium relief fans and providing new digital controls to replace
the existing relay-based, electric controls serving exhaust/relief fans in the gymnasium area.
Alternate #4 – Hydronic Balancing
There is a relatively high confidence level that the air-side of the installed HVAC systems are balanced
(providing as designed air flow). This project includes verifying this confidence level by testing and
balancing the air side based on a 25% sampling of each category of installed HVAC unit.
Reynolds, however, does not have a high confidence level that the water side of the installed HVAC systems
have been balanced correctly. This low confidence stems from the fact that numerous balancing valves
installed in the heating hot water and chilled water piping are wide open. Based on experience, wide open
balancing valves, more often than not, indicate an incomplete water side balancing effort at a minimum
and more likely water side balancing that was never completed properly.
Reynolds recommends that water side (hydronic) balancing be completed. The primary reason for this
recommendation is that if water flow to the HVAC system units is not per each HVAC unit flow
requirements, the controls upgrades in the base project will not be able to guarantee any long term
savings potential.
Alternate #5 – Retro-commissioning
Our approach to retro-commissioning (RCx) focuses on working with the owner and the Stone House
Group to ensure the building is meeting the school district’s functional needs as efficiently as possible.
Reynolds retro-commissioning process looks at the elements of the installed HVAC systems that are not
directly related to this project. e.g., we look at issues like are the existing valves and dampers or the newly
planned to be installed valves and dampers actually capable of performing what the prescribed control
sequences are requiring. We also look at whether the HVAC unit coil and/or air fan configurations can
deliver the prescribed control sequences. We also look at whether the new sequences of operation we will
be implementing during both the heating and cooling seasons are actually working by systematically
monitoring real-time trend data and performing quarterly onsite review and implementing changes as
needed. This service is quite often over-looked as necessary, but it needs to be seriously considered.
Alternate #6 – Air Balancing
Since confidence levels are relatively high regarding HVAC units having at or near proper air flow levels, air
balancing is an alternate for consideration or a future standalone project.
Jenkintown School District Page 8
June 7, 2019 IGA Summary – REV FINAL
Investment Grade Audit Summary
Alternate #7 – Install Variable Frequency Drives (VFDs)
The air handlers serving the gym, cafeteria, library and theater area are currently operated as constant
volume units. However, occupancy and corresponding load is variable through the day. Reynolds
recommends installing VFDs on these fan motors and operating them to maintain temperature in the
spaces, with override for ventilation control and economizer operation.
Savings Summary
Implementation of this project is estimated to result in annual electricity, fossil fuel and maintenance
savings totaling $24,983.00. A breakdown of the savings is provided in the following table:
TABLE: Annual Energy and Cost Savings by Measure
The total amount of guaranteed savings can be found in Schedule C of the GESA (to be added).
Financial Summary
The following table shows the financial overview for the project in terms of estimated construction cost,
resource, and operational savings. Resource savings are the sum total of all savings associated with utilities
(e.g., electric, gas). Operational savings primarily include the maintenance costs avoided due to equipment
being replaced.
ELECTRIC FUELS O&M TOTAL
kWh kW $ ccf $ $ $
1 Building Automation System Improvements 176,705 - 12,193$ 9,699 6,790$ 6,000$ 24,983$
TOTAL 176,705 - 12,193$ 9,699 6,790$ 6,000$ 24,983$
EEM
Jenkintown School District
Energy Project Financial Overview
EEM # EEM Name
Jenkintown SD Building1 Building Automation System Improvements 303,972$ 18,983$ 6,000$
PROJECT TOTALS 303,972$ 18,983$ 6,000$
Alternate Scope Items
A1 Install VAV Controllers 51,630$ 569$ 660$
A2 Solar PV Data Acquisition 6,528$
A3 ES Gym Relief Fan Replacement 7,121$
A4 Hydronic Balancing 37,981$
A5 Retro-commissioning 29,673$
A6 Air Balancing 17,210$
A7 Install VFD's (5 @ 3HP & 4 @ 7.5 HP) 40,948$ 1,501$ 1,740$
Alternates Totals 191,092$ 2,070$ 2,400$
PROJECT TOTALS (w/ Alternates) 495,064$ 21,053$ 8,400$
NOTES: (1)
EEM
Construction
Cost
Annual
Resource
Savings
Annual
Operational
Savings (1)
Operational savings primarily include avoided costs of maintaining removed equipment.
Jenkintown School District Page 9
June 7, 2019 IGA Summary – REV FINAL
Investment Grade Audit Summary
Projected Cash Flow
A cash flow analysis is provided on the following page based on the current project costs and savings
estimates. The cash flow assumes a 20-year term.
JE
NK
INT
OW
N S
CH
OO
L D
IST
RIC
T
Guara
nte
ed
Ene
rgy
Savi
ng
s C
ontr
act
Fin
an
ce
d P
roje
ct
Co
st
(1):
303,9
72
$
Escala
tio
n R
ate
s b
y U
tility
& F
ue
lF
inance T
erm
(years
):20
E
lectr
ic:
3.0
%
Annualiz
ed Inte
rest
Rate
:3.7
50%
Natu
ral G
as:
3.0
%
Accru
ed C
onstr
uction Inte
rest:
(0)
$
Fuel O
il:3.0
%
Wate
r:3.0
%
Oth
er:
3.0
%
Est.
Av
oid
ed
Cap
ital C
osts
(2):
-$
Opera
tional:
3.0
%
Esti
mate
d U
tility
Re
bate
s (
3):
-$
Escala
tion R
ate
s for
Annual F
ees:
2.0
%
112,1
93
$
6,7
90
$
-
$
6,0
00
$
24,9
83
$
23,4
64
$
-$
(2
1,6
27)
$
1,8
38
$
1,8
38
$
212,5
58
$
6,9
94
$
-
$
6,1
80
$
25,7
32
$
24,1
68
$
-$
(2
,498)
$
(2
1,6
27)
$
43
$
1,8
81
$
312,9
35
$
7,2
04
$
-
$
6,3
65
$
26,5
04
$
24,8
93
$
-$
(2
,561)
$
(2
1,6
27)
$
706
$
2,5
86
$
413,3
23
$
7,4
20
$
-
$
6,5
56
$
27,2
99
$
25,6
40
$
-$
(2
,625)
$
(2
1,6
27)
$
1,3
89
$
3,9
75
$
513,7
23
$
7,6
42
$
-
$
6,7
53
$
28,1
18
$
26,4
09
$
-$
(2
,690)
$
(2
1,6
27)
$
2,0
92
$
6,0
67
$
614,1
35
$
7,8
72
$
-
$
6,9
56
$
28,9
62
$
27,2
01
$
-$
(2
,758)
$
(2
1,6
27)
$
2,8
17
$
8,8
84
$
714,5
59
$
8,1
08
$
-
$
7,1
64
$
29,8
31
$
28,0
17
$
-$
(2
,827)
$
(2
1,6
27)
$
3,5
64
$
12,4
48
$
814,9
95
$
8,3
51
$
-
$
7,3
79
$
30,7
26
$
28,8
58
$
-$
(2
,897)
$
(2
1,6
27)
$
4,3
34
$
16,7
83
$
915,4
45
$
8,6
01
$
-
$
7,6
01
$
31,6
47
$
29,7
24
$
-$
(2
,970)
$
(2
1,6
27)
$
5,1
27
$
21,9
10
$
10
15,9
09
$
8,8
59
$
-
$
7,8
29
$
32,5
97
$
30,6
15
$
-$
(3
,044)
$
(2
1,6
27)
$
5,9
45
$
27,8
55
$
11
16,3
86
$
9,1
25
$
-
$
4,0
32
$
29,5
43
$
27,5
02
$
-$
(3
,120)
$
(2
1,6
27)
$
2,7
55
$
30,6
10
$
12
16,8
77
$
9,3
99
$
-
$
4,1
53
$
30,4
29
$
28,3
27
$
-$
(3
,198)
$
(2
1,6
27)
$
3,5
03
$
34,1
13
$
13
17,3
84
$
9,6
81
$
-
$
4,2
77
$
31,3
42
$
29,1
77
$
-$
(3
,278)
$
(2
1,6
27)
$
4,2
72
$
38,3
85
$
14
17,9
05
$
9,9
71
$
-
$
4,4
06
$
32,2
82
$
30,0
52
$
-$
(3
,360)
$
(2
1,6
27)
$
5,0
66
$
43,4
51
$
15
18,4
42
$
10,2
71
$
-$
4,5
38
$
33,2
51
$
30,9
54
$
-$
(3
,444)
$
(2
1,6
27)
$
5,8
83
$
49,3
34
$
16
18,9
96
$
10,5
79
$
-$
2,3
37
$
31,9
11
$
29,5
45
$
-$
(3
,530)
$
(2
1,6
27)
$
4,3
89
$
53,7
23
$
17
19,5
66
$
10,8
96
$
-$
2,4
07
$
32,8
69
$
30,4
32
$
-$
(3
,618)
$
(2
1,6
27)
$
5,1
87
$
58,9
10
$
18
20,1
53
$
11,2
23
$
-$
2,4
79
$
33,8
55
$
31,3
45
$
-$
(3
,709)
$
(2
1,6
27)
$
6,0
09
$
64,9
20
$
19
20,7
57
$
11,5
60
$
-$
2,5
54
$
34,8
70
$
32,2
85
$
-$
(3
,801)
$
(2
1,6
27)
$
6,8
57
$
71,7
77
$
20
21,3
80
$
11,9
06
$
-$
2,6
30
$
35,9
17
$
33,2
54
$
-$
(3
,896)
$
(2
1,6
27)
$
7,7
31
$
79,5
07
$
TO
TA
L327,6
21
$
182,4
51
$
-
$
102,5
96
$
612,6
68
$
571,8
62
$
-
$
(5
9,8
24)
$
(432,5
31)
$
79,5
07
$
NO
TE
S:
1
.
2.
Cu
mu
lati
ve
Sa
vin
gs
Fin
an
ce
d P
roje
ct C
os
t re
fle
cts
th
e g
ua
ran
tee
d fix
ed
pri
ce
of th
e s
co
pe
exe
cu
ted
un
de
r th
e G
ua
ran
tee
d E
ne
rgy
Sa
vin
gs
Ag
ree
me
nt, in
clu
din
g th
e fir
st ye
ar
of
me
as
ure
me
nt a
nd
ve
rifica
tio
n o
f s
avi
ng
s.
Avo
ide
d C
ap
ita
l S
avi
ng
s in
clu
de
s th
e a
mm
ort
ize
d a
nn
ua
l co
st o
f ca
pita
l e
qu
ipm
en
t re
pla
ce
me
nt o
r re
pa
irs
th
at w
ou
ld b
e r
ea
lize
d b
y th
e O
wn
er
with
in th
e life
tim
e o
f
the
En
erg
y P
roje
ct, b
ut w
ill in
ste
ad
be
co
mp
lete
d a
nd
fin
an
ce
d th
rou
gh
th
e E
ne
rgy
Pro
ject. S
avi
ng
s in
clu
de
th
e to
tal co
sts
fo
r a
ll d
es
ign
, b
idd
ing
, b
on
din
g,
pe
rmittin
g, e
qu
ipm
en
t a
nd
in
sta
lla
tio
n la
bo
r re
qu
ire
d to
co
mp
lete
th
e w
ork
. T
he
am
ou
nt s
ho
wn
re
pre
se
nts
th
e N
et P
res
en
t V
alu
e o
f th
e s
avi
ng
s o
ver
the
te
rm.
Op
era
tio
na
l
Co
st
Sa
vin
gs
Ne
t
Sa
vin
gs
To
tal
Co
st
Sa
vin
gs
An
nu
al
M&
V
Fe
es
Fin
an
cin
g
Pa
ym
en
t
Avo
ide
d
Ca
pit
al
Sa
vin
gs
Gu
ara
nte
ed
Sa
vin
gs
SC
HE
DU
LE
B
Ye
ar
Ele
ctr
ic
Co
st
Sa
vin
gs
Na
tura
l G
as
Co
st
Sa
vin
gs
Wa
ter
Co
st
Sa
vin
gs
Ca
sh
Flo
w A
na
lys
is