Upload
naomi-booker
View
234
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Stages of pharmaceutical manufacturing
API
Excipients
PrimaryPackaging
SecondaryPackaging
API FinishedProduct
Starting Materials(Chemicals)
Drug product manufacture
Dosage Form
Wetgranulation
milling
blending
Fluid Bed Dryer
lubrication
tabletingcoating
imprintingProcess combines the drug and excipients into the dosage form
ExcipientsAPI
crystallization
filtration
oven drying
Dry granulation/ milling
Directcompression
Solid dosage processing• Dosage forms
Quality factors
• Excipients• Particle properties• Processing routes• Unit operations
Size reduction (milling) Blending Dry granulation (roll compaction) Wet granulation Drying Tablet compaction Coating
Solid dosage forms
• Oral Tablets
• Lozenges• Chewable tablets• Effervescent tablets• Multi-layer tablets• Modified release
Capsules• Hard gelatin• Soft gelatin
Powders
• Inhaled Aerosol
• Metered dose inhalers• Dry powder inhalers
Singh, Naini (2002), Dosage Forms: Non-Parenteral, Encyclopedia of Pharmaceutical Technology
Quality factors for solid dosage forms
Functional quality factors
-Disintegrates to desired size quickly-The constituent particle size of the dosage form should dissolve and be absorbed in the GI tract at a pre-determined rate
Physical quality factors
-Must not break up on processing, packaging, transportation, dispensing or handling-Surface of tablet or capsule must be free of defects-Must be stable under anticipated environmental conditions-Have the same weight and composition for each tablet or capsule
Sensorial quality factors
-Easy and pleasant to swallow
Fung and Ng (2003), AIChE Journal, 49(5), 1193-1215
Models at different scales
Scale Subject Problems
Enterprise Business process Sourcing, contract manufacturing, capacity planning
Plant Process synthesis, simulation, development
Generation of process alternatives, process optimization
Equipment Equipment selection, performance, sizing, costing
Mixing, classification, granulation, milling
Continuum Flow and handling of powders Granular flow
Particle Particle attributes: composition, size distribution, density, strength, shape
Interparticle forces, breakage
Molecule Enantiomers and polymorphs, material properties
Polymorph prediction, prediction of physical and chemical properties
Ng (2002), Powder Technology, 126, 205-210
Product and process functions
• Product function
Product property: Content uniformity, dissolution, flowability, dust formation
Particle Properties: Particle size, particle shape, surface characteristics
• Process function
Process parameters: Type of unit operation, operational parameters
Product property = F(particle properties, formulation)
Particle properties = F(process parameters, raw material/intermediate properties)
Particle properties
Potential Impact Processing Behavior
Product Quality Factors
Property Flow Blending Wetting Drying Mechanical Dissolution Stability
Particle Size X X X X X X X
Surface Area X X X X X X X
Particle Shape X
Surface Energy X X X
Bulk Density X X X
Pore Size X X X
Internal Friction X X
Wall Friction X X
Hygroscopicity X X X
Hlinak et al, Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation, 1 (2006)
Product property = F(particle properties, formulation)
Mean particle size and flowability
Bodhmage, A. (2006). Correlation between physical properties and flowability indicators for fine powders. MS Thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan.
Size distributions for various powders
Bodhmage, A. (2006). Correlation between physical properties and flowability indicators for fine powders. MS Thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan.
Powder flow and tablet weight variations
Hancock, Bruno (2007). Dosage Form Specific Tests. Short course on Material Properties, Purdue University.
Excipients
• To aid in the processing of the drug delivery system during its manufacture;
• To protect, support, or enhance stability, bioavailability or patient acceptability;
• To assist in product identification;• To enhance any other attribute of the overall safety, effectiveness,
or delivery of the drug during storage or use.
Excipients are substances, other than the active drug substance, or finished dosage form, that have been appropriately evaluated for safety and are included in drug delivery systems:
USP, General Information Chapter <1078>, Good Manufacturing Practices for Bulk Pharmaceutical Excipients
Excipient functions
Component Function Examples
Fillers Increase size and weight of final dosage form
Microcrystalline cellulose, sucrose
Binders Promote particle aggregation Pregelatinized starch, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose
Disintegrants Promote break down of aggregates Sodium starch glycolate
Flow Aids Reduce interaction between particles Talc
Lubricants Reduce interactions between particles and surfaces of processing equipment
Magnesium stearate
Surfactants Promotes wetting Sodium lauryl sulfate, Polysorbate
Modified Release Agents
Influences the release of active Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose, Surelease,
Hlinak (2005)
Most popular excipients• Magnesium stearate (lubricant)• Lactose (compression aid)• Microcrystalline cellulose
(compression aid)• Starch (corn) (compression aid)• Silicon dioxide (glidant)• Stearic acid (lubricant)• Sodium starch glycollate (disintegrant)• Gelatin (binder)• Talc (film coating adjuvant, glidant)• Sucrose (sweetener, coating)• Calcium stearate (lubricant)
• Povidone (binder)• Pre-gelatinized starch (binder)• Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (film
coating, binder)• OPA products (film coats and dyes)• Crosscarmelose sodium (disintegrant)• Hydroxypropylcellulose (binder, film
coating)• Ethylcellulose (enteric coating)• Dibasic calcium phosphate
(compression aid)• Crospovidone (disintegrant)• Shellac and Glaze (coating agent)
International pharmaceutical excipients council of the americas, http://www.ipecamericas.org/public/faqs.html
Processing routes
Fill die
Coating, Packaging etc..
Compress Tablet
Direct Compression
DrugDiluentGlidantDisintegrant
Lubricant
Dry Granulation
Disintegrant GlidantLubricant
DrugDiluentLubricant
Mixing
Compression
Comminution
Screening
Mixing
Mixing
Wetting
Granulation
Drying
Screening
Mixing
DrugDiluent
BinderSolvent
Disintegrant GlidantLubricant
Wet Granulation
Other Routes
Fluidized bed granulationExtrusion / rotary granulation
Tablet Compression
Unit operations
• Process function
Process parameters: Type of unit operation, operational parameters
• Type of unit operation Size reduction (Milling) Blending Dry granulation (Roll compaction) Wet granulation Drying Tablet compression Coating
Particle properties = F(process parameters, feed/intermediate properties)
Unit operations
• Size reduction (milling) Advantages and disadvantages Forces in milling Milling equipment (dry milling) Media mills (wet milling) Mill selection Energy requirements
Particle size reduction
• Mixing is more uniform if ingredients are roughly the same size• Milling of wet granules can promote uniform and efficient drying• Increased surface area can improve dissolution rate and
bioavailablity• Improved content uniformity of dosage units
• Excessive heat generation can lead to degradation, change in polymorphic form
• Increase in surface energy can lead to agglomeration• May result in excessive production of fines or overly broad particle
size distribution
Benefits
Disadvantages
Forces in milling
• Shear (cutting forces)• Compression (crushing
forces)• Impact (high velocity
collision)
Griffith theory• T = Tensile stress• Y = Young’s modulus• ε = Surface energy• c = fault length
YT
c
Rumpf (1965), Chem Ing Tech, 37(3), 187-202
Milling equipment – screen mills
• Critical parameters for a conical screen mill Screen Hole Size/Shape Impeller Type Impeller Clearance Speed
• Evaluate impact on aspirin granulation Particle size reduction Milling time and energy requirements Overall milling performance
• Milling Work Index = Size reduction / Milling work• Milling Time Index = Size reduction / Milling time
Byers, Peck (1990), Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 16(11), 1761-1779
Milling equipment – screen mills
• Screen hole size has largest impact on particle size reduction, milling time and energy requirements
• Milling work index significantly lower for smaller screen hole sizes
• Impeller type has largest effect on overall milling performance
• Impeller clearance not significant at small clearances• Milling work index lower at higher mill speeds
Deflection of material away from screens
Byers, Peck (1990), Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 16(11), 1761-1779
Milling work index= Particle size reduction / Milling work
Milling equipment – impact mills
• Significant wear on surfaces
• Hammer mills Medium to coarse size reduction Peripheral speed 20-50 m/sec
• Pin mills Peripheral speed up to 200 m/sec Capable of fine grinding Can be used to mill sticky materials
Milling equipment – jet mill
• Superfine to colloid size reduction• Can be used for heat sensitive products• Different configurations
Pancake (spiral) jet mill• Fines exit from center
Loop/oval jet mill• Fines exit from top
Opposing jet mills• Particles impact each other in opposing jets
Fluidized bed jet mill• Particles are jetted towards center (low wear on equipment)
Fixed/moving target jet mills• Particles impact on surface of target (wear can be significant)
Milling equipment – stirred media mill
• Critical parameters Agitator speed Feed rate Size of beads Bead charge Density of beads Design of blades Mill chamber Residence time
Energy based analysis – ball mill
• Macroscale energy-size relationships (Chen et al., 2004) Calculate specific energy for a given size reduction Functional form derived from theoretical considerations Rittinger’s model
• Energy required for particle size reduction is proportional to the area of new surface created
Kick’s model• Energy required to break a particle is proportional to the ratio of the particle
volume before reduction to the volume after reduction
Chen et al. (2004), J Pharm Sci, 93(4), 113-132
1 1PR R
P F
m tE C
W x x
lnP FK K
P
m t xE C
W x
Energy based analysis – ball millKick’s LawHigh loadingLow frequencyRolling attrition
Rittinger’s LawLow loadingHigh frequencyImpact fragmentation
1F
PR
xx
k t
exp( )p F Kx x k t
Attrition
Fragmentation
Size Reduction of α–Lactose Monohydrate in a Ball Mill
Chen et al. (2004), J Pharm Sci, 93(4), 113-132
Blending – diffusion mixing
• Critical parameters Blender load Blender speed Blending time V-Blender
Cross FlowBlender
Bin Blender
Double ConeBlender
Blending – convective mixingRibbon Blenders Orbiting Screw Blenders
Planetary Blenders
Horizontal Double Arm Blenders
Forberg Blenders
Vertical High Intensity Mixers
Horizontal High Intensity MixersDiffusion Mixers with Intensifier/Agitator
Mixing in a bin blender – axial mixing
Sudah et al. (2002), Powder Technology, 126, 191-200
Composition after 30 revolutions (10rpm, 60%fill, w/o baffle)
Mixing in a bin blender – radial mixing
Sudah et al. (2002), Powder Technology, 126, 191-200
Composition after 30 revolutions (10rpm, 60%fill, w/o baffle)
Unit operations
• Dry granulation (roll compaction) Critical parameters Johanson’s theory Feed system Impact of granulation on flow properties
• Wet granulation Monitoring liquid addition
• Drying Fluidised bed dryer
Roll compaction
• Critical parameters Roll speed and pressure Horizontal and vertical
feed speed, deaeration Roll diameter and
surface
• Advantages Improve powder flow Reduce segregation
potential No moisture addition,
drying
Johanson’s theory
Slip region
Nip region
Yu et al. (2013), Chem Eng Sci, 86, 9-18
Compressibility
Eff. angle of friction Wall angle of friction
Falzone et al. (1992), Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 18(4), 469-489
Avicel PH 101
Compressibility Mean particle size
Impact of feed and roll speed on granule properties
HH
RR
Impact of feed and roll speed on granule properties
Mean particle size
Hydrous Lactose
HH
Falzone et al. (1992), Drug Dev Ind Pharm, 18(4), 469-489
VV
R=4 R=8
Characterization of flowability
• Hausner ratio = tapped density / bulk density Excellent 1.05–1.10 Good 1.11–1.15 Fair 1.15–1.20 Passable 1.21–1.25 Poor 1.26–1.31 Very Poor 1.32–1.37 Extremely Poor 1.38–1.45
Roll compaction and flow properties
Soares et al. (2005), Dry granulation and compression of spray dried plant extracts, AAPS PharmSciTech
Before Compaction (poor)
After Compaction (excellent)
High shear wet granulation
• Advantages Improve flow Improve uniformity Increase bulk density Enhance resistance to
segregation
• Critical parameters Amount of binder Rate of addition Time of granulation Speed
Mixer Blade
Bowl
Chopper Blade
Discharge
Wet granulation – monitoring liquid addition
Jorgensen et al. (2004), J Pharm Sci, 93(9), 2232-2243
(A) 0.24 ml/g
Impeller Torque for α–Lactose Monohydrate/MCC granulation
(C) 0.47 ml/g agglomeration
(B) 0.36 ml/g nucleation
(D) 0.53 ml/g agglomerate growth
Wet granulation – monitoring liquid addition
Jorgensen et al. (2004), J Pharm Sci, 93(9), 2232-2243
(A) 0.24 ml/g (1 min)
SEM of α–Lactose Monohydrate/MCC granules
(C) 0.47 ml/g (2 min) agglomeration
(B) 0.36 ml/g (1.5 min) nucleation
(D) 0.53 ml/g (2.25 min) agglomerate growth
bar = 500 μm
Fluid bed drying
Air Flow
Inlet FilterCondensorSteamDamper
Damper Outlet Filter
Air Flow
ProductTemperature
InletTemperature
OutletTemperature
From Granulator
To Mill
Drying Zone
Filter Bag
Air Flow
RetainingScreein
Unit operations
• Tablet compaction Relative density and compaction pressure
• Coating Objectives Critical parameters
Relative density changes in manufacture of tablets
Hancock et al. (2004), Pharm Tech, April 2003, 64-80
Equivalence of tablets made with different presses
Hancock et al. (2004), Pharm Tech, April 2003, 64-80
Pan coating
• Benefits Mask taste Chemical barrier Controlled release Appearance
• Critical Parameters Air flow Spray Drum dynamics
• Rotational speed• Fill fraction
Air+Moisture
Dry Air
Rotation
Baffle
Spray Nozzle
Air Flow
Inlet FilterSteamInlet
Temperature
Inlet Air
Outlet AirOutlet Filter
OutletTemperature
References
• Theory and Practice of Industrial Pharmacy, L. Lachman et al. (eds) (1986).
• Handbook of Pharmaceutical Granulation Technology, D. M. Parikh (ed), Marcel Dekker (1997).
• Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms: Tablets, vol 2, Marcel Dekker (1990).
• Encyclopedia of Pharmaceutical Technology, Marcel Dekker (2003).
• Perry’s Chemical Engineers Handbook, 7th Ed., McGraw Hill (1997).