Upload
hilel-stanley
View
23
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Introduction to Recovery. Presenters. Ron Campbell University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Emergency Management Coordinator 24 years of experience in emergency management including more than a dozen disaster events including Hurricane Irene at UNC-CH Peter Drenan Dewberry, Vice President - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Ron Campbell• University of North Carolina Chapel Hill,
Emergency Management Coordinator• 24 years of experience in emergency
management including more than a dozen disaster events including Hurricane Irene at UNC-CH
Peter Drenan• Dewberry, Vice President• 32 years of experience including 10 years with
FEMA’s Public Assistance program and 10+ years as architect at University of Virginia
Recent Experience What is Public Assistance Common Challenges Tools and Tips Recovery Program
Snow Storms Hurricane Irene Tornados Floods
Pre-disaster plan focused on mitigation• Minimize disruptions and closings• Protect research • Control insurance rates • Reduce damage to facilities
4 Phases:•Phase 1 - Organize Resources•Phase 2 – Hazard Identification & Risk
Assessment•Phase 3 – Developing The Mitigation Plan•Phase 4 – Adoption & Implementation
Disaster Resistant UniversitiesDisaster Resistant Universities
Post-disaster Federal financial assistance
What does it cover: •Debris removal•Emergency protective measures•Repair, replacement, or restoration•Mitigation of damaged facilities
75% Federal, 25% State/Local
MONEY $$$$$
Benefits:• Maximum reimbursement• Expeditious project approval• Maximize time and resources
Consequences:• Minimal reimbursement• Delays in project approval• Diminished credibility• Appeals• Audits• De-obligation of funding
Why YOU Need to Understand the ProgramWhy YOU Need to Understand the Program
Major storm hit a small university All 43 buildings flooded for weeks
• Classes were closed
• Students sent home
Administration’s stated goal was to open next semester for all students
Emergency Financing required to develop temporary teaching and research facilities
What are the issues and considerations for getting the work done and getting FEMA reimbursements?
A Real ExampleA Real Example
Project Accounting Unsupported Costs Duplication of Benefits Excessive Equipment Charges Unrelated Project Charges Excessive Labor and Fringe Benefits Charges Poor Contracting Practices Unapplied Credits
Criteria: Federal regulations (44 CFR 13.20 and 206.205) require each subgrantee to: • maintain a system that accounts for FEMA
funds on a project-by-project basis.• The system must disclose the financial results
for all FEMA-funded activities accurately, currently, and completely.
Examples:• Collecting or tracking the information well after
the incident• Notes were maintained by hand
Criteria: Federal regulations (OMB Circular A-87 and 44 CFR 13.20) require that costs claimed under federal programs be adequately supported by source documentation such as cancelled checks, payrolls, contracts, etc.
Examples:• Invoices do not provide detailed dates that
coincided with the storm.• Records for vehicle use does not match up with the
payroll records.• Records for vehicle use cannot be verified with
event related calls.• Receipts do not have an employees name
associated with it.
Criteria: Government laws and regulations (Stafford Act and 44 CFR 206.191) prohibit duplication of benefits.
Examples:• Insurance claim not submitted for a project
covered by insurance.• Reimbursement from another source was not
disclosed on the Project Worksheet.
Criteria: According to OMB Circular A-87, grants must be reduced by credits that offset or reduce expenses allocable to federal awards.
Examples:• Jurisdiction received proceeds from the sale
of scrap material related to the FEMA project but did not apply them.
• Jurisdiction received two credit discounts for early payments to a contractor that were not applied.
Criteria: Federal regulations (44 CFR 206.228) require that subgrantees use the FEMA schedule of equipment rates or their local rates, whichever are lower.
Example:• Claiming the FEMA equipment rate rather
than the lesser local rate.
Criteria: According to OMB Circular A-87, charges to federal grants must be necessary and reasonable to fulfill the objective of the grant program.
Examples:• Unrelated charges were included in a claim.• Funding received was not applied to the
correct project.
Criteria: According to OMB Circular A-87, allowable costs must be consistent with policies, regulations, and procedures that apply uniformly to both federal awards and other activities of the governmental unit. According to 44 CFR 206.228, straight or regular-time salaries and benefits of permanent employees engaged in emergency service work are not eligible for FEMA assistance.
Example:• Fringe benefit rates are applied differently to
overtime compared to regular time.• Regular time is almost always not eligible.
Criteria. According to federal regulations (44 CFR 13.36), a subgrantee must comply with specific procurement standards.
Examples:• Jurisdiction did not document the basis or
method for the contract selection.• Jurisdiction entered into a contract which
included an overhead and profit allowance of 25% of actual costs.
Xavier received $75.4 Million for damages 40 ‘large’ and 57 ‘small’ grant
authorizations Inspector General audit done in June 2010 At that time, $35 million had been
disbursed Final IG Recommendation:
• Disallow $75.4 million
Xavier University of Louisiana
Xavier University of Louisiana
#1- Disallow $25,648,720 due to unsupported costs
#2 – Disallow $49,409,570 due to ineligible contract costs
#3 – Disallow $281,430 due to ineligible insurance costs
#4 – Disallow $12,291 due to ineligible facilities
#5 – Finalize insurance review and allocate proceeds to repairs
#6 – Implement controls on time restrictions & extensions
Xavier University of Louisiana
Xavier University of Louisiana
Standard Systems• Documentation• Checks and balances• Use it everyday
Project Worksheet• How to fill them out
How to Think During an Event
Documentation is key!
Policies should require departments and personnel to: • maintain a system that accounts for
university funds on a project-by-project basis.
• The system must disclose the financial results for all university-funded activities accurately, currently, and completely
• Costs being claimed must be adequately supported by source documentation such as cancelled checks, payrolls, contracts, etc.
Duplication of Benefits Excessive Equipment Charges Excessive Labor and Fringe Benefits Poor Contracting Practices Unapplied Credits
The more you use it the easier it will be!
Basic Project Information
Damage Description and Dimensions
Scope of Work
Special Considerations
Cost
Describe the damage description and dimensions
Describe the cause of the damage Describe the pre-disaster condition Quantify the disaster related
damage Describe how you fixed the damage,
scope of work
Necessary vs. Unnecessary Justifiable vs. Unjustifiable Normal Policies/Process vs. Not
Normal
Next steps:•Review systems•Adjust/Develop systems•Establish/adjust processes and policies
•Train staff
Common Challenges Can be Navigated
Documentation, Documentation, Documentation!