Upload
dothuan
View
232
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Introduction to Process Analytical Technology
PAT
PhPh. D. Line Lundsberg. D. Line Lundsberg--NielsenNielsenLundsberg ConsultingLundsberg ConsultingIndustriFarmaceutForeningen, 2. marts, 2006IndustriFarmaceutForeningen, 2. marts, 2006
2Lundsberg Consulting
PAT – Process Understanding
The goal is to understand our processes enabling us fast to develop and produce smart and cost effectively high quality products
3Lundsberg Consulting
Who is strongly involved in PAT, 2006
• Sanofi Aventis (first approval)
• ~10 other approvals (not public – OTC, generic, API, biotech, DP)
• Pfizer (4 b $ savings – PAT a part of the tools)
• GSK (to save inventory 2b$)
• Abbott (Controlling the Porto Rico plants by PAT from US – saved 3 digit million $/year – save inventory 1b$/year)
• AstraZeneca (Plackstadt)
• AstraZeneca (Sødertäljecontrolled 70% by PAT)
• Ge Healthcare• Merck • Wyeth• BMS
• Lilly• Lundbeck• Baxter• Amgen• Novo Nordisk• Watson Pharmaceuticals• Xcellercx• Scherring-Plough• Johnson&Johnson• Amteck• Novartis• Sandoz• Genentech• Biogen• FDA, ICH, ISPE, ASTM,
aaps,…..
4Lundsberg Consulting
Outline
• Why PAT?• What is PAT?• Examples of applying PAT
tools
Why PAT
6Lundsberg Consulting
“The pharmaceutical industry has a little secret: Even as it invents futuristic new drugs, its manufacturing techniques lag far behind those of potato-chip and laundry-soap makers”
7Lundsberg Consulting
Doug Dean, FDA Science Board, Nov 16, 2001
Current Paradigm:
• Utilisation levels - 15% or less
• Scrap and rework - plan for 5-10%
• Time to effectiveness - takes years
• Hesitant to Innovate– Incentive?
• Manufacturing Costs: $90 Billion
Why PAT?
Ray Scherzer, FDA Science Board, Apr 2, 2002
8Lundsberg Consulting
Product focus – the traditional development concept
• Compliance – meet specifications – documentations• 3 validation batches• Trial and error• Limited sampling and analysis• Ignore variations, testing to required specifications• No changes, changes are negative• No link between input and output quality• Budgeted scraps, rework, OOS, investigations
Input Production Output
9Lundsberg Consulting
Pharmas compared to other industries
65
90
95
99
99,999
Yields (%)
25-35
20-25
4-8
4-8
1-3
Cost of Quality (% of COGS)
>99%Car, & electronics
1-4%
2-20%
20-50%
>90%
Mass Productivity (Kg Product/ Kg total ex water)
Pharma-ceuticals
Fine Chemicals
Bulk chemicals
Oil refining
Industry
10Lundsberg Consulting
Cost of manufacturing
25%
12%
30%
12%
5%16%Net Income
TaxOther Expenses
SGA
R&D
COGS
Components of Pharmaceutical Industry Costs
What is PAT
12Lundsberg Consulting
PAT- Process Analytical Technology
A Framework for Innovative Pharmaceutical Development,
Manufacturing, and Quality Assurance
FDA PAT Guide
PAT is a framework – not a set of requirements
13Lundsberg Consulting
Change Focus
Move from product focus to process focus
14Lundsberg Consulting
What is PAT, by definition
• A system for:– designing, analyzing, and controlling
manufacturing– timely measurements (i.e., during processing)– critical quality and performance attributes – raw and in-process materials– processes
• “Analytical” includes:– integrated chemical, physical, microbio-
logical, mathematical, and risk analysis
• Focus of PAT is Understanding and Controlling the manufacturing Process
15Lundsberg Consulting
Designing
Based on– Target product profile– Raw materials and intermediates and their
variability– Systematic compilation of Process
Knowledge (literature, existing, other processes and new)
– Identification of critical quality attributes CQA
– Identification of critical process parameters CPP
– Understanding the process
16Lundsberg Consulting
Analysing
• Analysis of (relevant and appropriate, not necessary on-line, but results has to be used for justification within the production process)
– Raw Materials– Process data– In-process analysis– Critical Control Points
• Prediction of– Process and product quality
17Lundsberg Consulting
Controlling
• Control strategies• Monitoring critical quality attributes and
process parameters• Process signatures• Feed-back control• Feed-forward control• Process performance
18Lundsberg Consulting
The PAT Framework will enable
• Focusing on Process Understanding• Creating an environment that facilitates
rationale science, risk, and business decisions
• Providing a flexible and less burdensome regulatory approach for well understood processes
• Only controlling critical quality and process parameters
• Managing the variability in manufacturing processes
Input Production Output
19Lundsberg Consulting
A Process is understood when
• All critical sources of variability are identified and explained
• Variability is managed by the process
• Product quality attributes can be accurately and reliable predicted
20Lundsberg Consulting
PAT production framework
On-line control of critical parameters
Feed back Process control
loop
Raw materialsProduct
Adjustment
Production processes
Monitoring of critical parameters
Adjustment
21Lundsberg Consulting
Result of the “new” way of thinking
• A focus on process understanding will reduce/remove validation burden
• No process validation - each batch process is a validation
• If anything goes wrong, we know what it is• Room for natural variation (e.g. raw material)• Reduction in OOS and failure investigations• Quality of end product can be predicted• Expected regulatory relief• Cost reduction!!!
22Lundsberg Consulting
Note!
• Transfer of laboratory methods to on-, in-, or at-line methods may not necessarily be PAT
• A “PAT” technology used in the lab may not necessarily be PAT
23Lundsberg Consulting
PAT is multi functional
• Chemists• Pharmacist• Process Engineers• Quality expert• Analytical chemist• Chemometician (statistician)• Regulatory• Development• Manufacturing
24Lundsberg Consulting
PAT Tools
• Integrated Systems Approach • Risk Based Approach• Systematic approach• Related tools – LEAN, Six Sigma• Multivariate tools for design, data acquisition
and analysis• Process analyzers• Process control tools• Continuous improvement and
knowledge management tools• Real Time Release
25Lundsberg Consulting
Obstacles in implementing PAT
• Understanding ”Process Understanding”• Holistic approach• Not only a R&D, production or support issue• Organisational challenges: Has to involve
– R&D– QA– RA – Productions– Engineering– QC
• Need top management support• Change management: Changing the way we
normally work and co-operate together• The development and implementation strategy
for new products has to be reworked…
Examples
27Lundsberg Consulting
What Can Be Measured Using PATAPI/Raw Materials
• Chemical Interactions• Particle Size Distribution• Polymorphism• Reaction Rate & Endpoint• Concentration/Composition/Uniformity• Identification• Drying Rate & Endpoint• Adequacy of a Cleaning Process• Etc.
28Lundsberg Consulting
What Can Be Measured Using PATDrug Product
• Particle Size Distribution• Blending Homogeneity & Endpoint• Granulation Rate & Endpoint• Drying Rate and Endpoint• Drying Temperature & Relative Humidity• Drying Airflow Rate• Tablet Identity• Tablet Uniformity/Potency• Dissolution Rate• Tablet Weight• Tablet Thickness• Tablet Hardness• Tablet Coating Thickness & Quality• Coating solution viscosity & specific gravity• Etc.
29Lundsberg Consulting
Example 1, Solid dosage forms
• Sticking of blend to tablet punches• Creates damages tablets• Scrap!
• Why?
• Lack of process understanding• What is critical to the product and to
the process?
30Lundsberg Consulting
Tablet Sticking during Production
31Lundsberg Consulting
Vision System Theory
The Vision system takes an individual digital image of every particle of a dispersed sample then measures the size and shape from the image to produce a distribution
Glass Slide
Particles of sample
TelevisionCamera
32Lundsberg Consulting
Magnesium Stearate - Japan vs. Brazil
Japanese material has 202 % the surface area of the Brazilian material
Brazil magnesium stearate
Japan magnesium stearate
33Lundsberg Consulting
Sticking versus Dissolution Issues
• Mg stearate supplier was changed to increased surface area material, for all products following the successful work to eliminate sticking.
• New “Good” supplier material caused low and variable dissolution in a capsules product
• One PSD does not fit all– Some plants now uses one grade of material
for capsules and another grade for tablets
• Very robust processes with optimal material
34Lundsberg Consulting
Example 2, Blend homogeneity
• How to avoid segregation? • When is a blend homogenate?• What is critical for our blend process
35Lundsberg Consulting
V-blender, on-line NIR monitoring
Rodolfo J. Romañach, UPR-Mayagüez, PRPQA January 24, 2006
36Lundsberg Consulting
Bohle-blender, on-line NIR monitoring
Experimental design for on-line
measurement of powder mixing
using a diode array NIR
37Lundsberg Consulting
On-line NIR monitoring of powder mixing
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
Rotations
Con
cent
ratio
n / %
On-line results using PLS calibration
On-line concentration of API
On-line concentration of mic. cellulose
On-line concentration of Mg-stearate
Step I: Mixing of API and talcum powder
Step II: Addition of mic. cellulose and otherexcipients
Step III: Addition of Mg-stearate
38Lundsberg Consulting
Example 3, Crystallisation
• Separation of polymorphs• Crystal shape & size• PSD
39Lundsberg Consulting
Crystallisation process
NIR
40Lundsberg Consulting
Crystal forms, Raman
41Lundsberg Consulting
Identification of different polymorphs, NIR
Amorphous
Crystal form α
Crystal form β
Crystal form α and β (1:1)
III
I
I + II
II
Amorphous
Crystal form α
Crystal form β
Crystal form α and β (1:1)
III AmorphousAmorphous
Crystal form αCrystal form α
Crystal form βCrystal form β
Crystal form α and β (1:1)Crystal form α and β (1:1)
III
I
I + II
II
42Lundsberg Consulting
Crystallisation
Lasentec probeFocused beam reflectanse
Probe inserted into crystalliser
Circulating light beam bounces of particles suspended in solvent
Measures crystal diameter
43Lundsberg Consulting
Crystal size during formation
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1:16:00 1:20:48 1:25:36 1:30:24 1:35:12
Reaction Time (hrs)
Part
icle
Cou
nt s
ec-1
0-50 microns
O-10 microns
50-100 microns
> 100 microns
Seed point
44Lundsberg Consulting
Endoscope picture inside crystalliser
Possible benefits
Control of fines or agglomerates in API
Reduced need to mill
Control of particle size
45Lundsberg Consulting
Warming to lower content of fines.
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
12:28 12:57 13:26 13:55 14:24 14:52 15:21 15:500
50
100
150
200
250
#/sec, No Wt 0 10 #/sec, No Wt 10 50 #/sec, No Wt 50 100 #/sec, No Wt 100 1000
50-100
0 - 10
10- 50
100- 1000
Temp
46Lundsberg Consulting
Summary
• PAT is a science and risk based framework
• Process Understanding is the heart of PAT• PAT is a tool for managing the variability in
the various manufacturing steps• PAT is a tool for faster product development• PAT is design, analysing and controlling what
is critical• PAT is a tool for production optimisation• PAT is a tool for cost reduction• PAT is a not new but new to pharmaceutical
manufacturing!
47Lundsberg Consulting
Acknowledge
• FDA, Ali Afnan and Chris Watts• Industrial colleagues:
– Ajaz Hussain, Sandoz– Ray Scherzer, GSK– Steve Hammond, Pfizer– Zhihong Ge, Merck– Casper Leuenhagen, Novo Nordisk– Mette Bryder, H. Lundbeck A/S – Lisbeth Thierry-Carstensen, H. Lundbeck A/S – Anette Hansen, H. Lundbeck A/S– Uffe Svare, H. Lundbeck A/S– Michael Hahn, H. Lundbeck A/S– Frank Høien Lendal H. Lundbeck A/S– Gert Mølgaard, NNE
48Lundsberg Consulting
Questions?
More examples
50Lundsberg Consulting
Example 4, controlling reactions
• Conventional samples are taken at “appropriate time” and analysed in lab (take days or weeks)
• But what is happening during reaction?• What is critical to the process?• How can yields be optimised and
impurities minimised?
51Lundsberg Consulting
On-line NIR, IR or Raman
On-line control of critical parameters
Feed back Process control loop
Raw materialsProduct
Adjustment
Production processes
Monitoring of critical parameters
Adjustment
52Lundsberg Consulting
No samplingNo operator exposureAccurate end pointControl of impurities
Mid-IR to Monitor and Control Reactions
Curves generated using peak heights at 2-point baseline:Blue – starting material at 2239 cm-1Red – starting material at 930 cm-1Green – product at 1308 cm-1
53Lundsberg Consulting
Typical reaction monitoring techniques - NIR
• NIR is a strong tool for controlling end-point reaction
• Note NIR does not see every thing, e.g. not generation of impurities
Progress of reaction Reaction
complete
54Lundsberg Consulting
On-line Raman, monitoring Catalytic Hydrogenation Reaction
ReactantIntermediateProduct